Expanding criteria for resectability of colorectal liver metastases

The results of surgery for colorectal hepatic metastases following expansion of the indications in 2005

AIM

Safety and survival were investigated in patients treated according to expanded surgical indications for colorectal hepatic metastases.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent resection of colorectal hepatic metastases at Zhongshan Hospital from 2000 to 2010 was conducted. The patients were divided into two groups based on a change in the surgical indications introduced in 2005. Patients in Group I underwent hepatic surgery between 2000 and 2004 and those in Group II between 2005 and 2010. The clinicopathological data and survival rates of both groups were analysed.

RESULTS

There were 530 patients who underwent hepatic surgery between 2000 and 2010. After the expansion of surgical indications, the rate of surgical resection rose from 25.1 to 35.1% (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in perioperative mortality (2.2% vs 0.9%) or morbidity (20.9% vs 29.8%). Recurrence occurred in 27.5% and 36.7% in Groups I and II, respectively, and 5-year overall survival was 43% and 49%, respectively (not significant).

CONCLUSION

Expanding the indications for surgical resection of hepatic metastases increased the resection rate but had no significant effect on survival.

Outcome after repeat resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Although advances in multimodal treatment have led to prolongation of survival in patients after resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CRC-LM), most patients develop recurrence, which is often confined to the liver. Repeat hepatic resection (RHR) may prolong survival or even provide cure in selected patients. We evaluated the perioperative and long-term outcomes after RHR for CRC-LM in a single institution series.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Since 1999, 92 repeat hepatic resections (63% wedge/segmental, 37% hemihepatectomy or greater) for recurrent CRC-LM were performed in 80 patients. Median interval from initial liver resection to first RHR was 1.25 years. Any kind of chemotherapy (CTx) had been given in 88% before RHR. Neoadjuvant CTx was given in 38%.

RESULTS

Hepatic margin-negative resection was achieved in 79%. Mortality was 3.8%. Overall complication rates were 53%, including infection (17%), operative re-intervention (12%), and hepatic failure (5.4%). Overall 5-year survival after first RHR was 50.3%. Univariately, primary tumor stage, the extent of liver resection, postoperative complications, and the overall resection margin correlated with survival. By multivariate analysis, primary T stage, size of metastasis, and overall R0 resection influenced survival. Survival was not independently influenced by hepatic resection margins or (neoadjuvant) CTx.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat hepatic resection for recurrent CRC-LM can be performed with low mortality and acceptable morbidity. Survival after repeat hepatic resection in this selected group of patients is encouraging and comparable to results after first liver resections.

Limiting factors for liver regeneration after a major hepatic resection for colorectal cancer metastases

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy before resection of colorectal metastases in the liver is extensively used and has been shown to induce histopathological changes in the liver parenchyma, although little is known about the effect of chemotherapy on liver regeneration. The aim of this study was to determine if pre-operative chemotherapy influences the regenerated liver volume after a major liver resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 74 patients subjected to a major liver resection for colorectal metastases. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they had been treated with chemotherapy less than 3 months before surgery or not. Liver volumes were measured before and 1 year after resection.

RESULTS

Pre-operative chemotherapy reduced volumetric liver regeneration (83 ± 2% versus 91 ± 2%; P = 0.007) as compared with patients without chemotherapy. There was a linear correlation between regenerated volume and time interval between the end of chemotherapy to resection (P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases negatively affects volume regeneration after a partial hepatectomy. The time interval between chemotherapy and surgery determines the impact of these affects.

Do patients' outcomes suffer when surgical fellows are involved in hepatic resection?

INTRODUCTION

Hepatectomy is an advanced technique learned during surgical fellowship. Outcomes have not been described for hepatectomies involving fellows.

METHODS

We analyzed hepatectomies from the 2005-2011 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. We compared cases with a fellow (FELLOW group) and those without a fellow (ATTENDING group).

RESULTS

FELLOW cases (n = 1,562; 54%) included more major hepatectomies and more metastasectomies (P < .002). Mortality was 3.2% versus 2.7% (P = .5) and morbidity was 30.7% vs 26.2% (P = .008) for FELLOW versus ATTENDING cases. On multivariate analysis, mortality was similar, but morbidity was greater in FELLOW cases (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.4; P = .03), with increased superficial surgical site infections (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.2-2.4; P = .001). There were no differences in rates of sepsis, cardiac, pulmonary, or thromboembolic complications. Compared with ATTENDING cases, FELLOW cases during the first half of training, carried greater morbidity (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8; P = .006); however, this difference disappears by the second half of the academic year.

CONCLUSION

Hepatectomy involving a fellow may be associated with an increased risk of surgical site infections. FELLOW cases were more complex. Mortality, cardiac, pulmonary, and other serious morbidities were similar. Despite slightly greater rates of surgical site infections, training in hepatic surgery maintains excellent patient outcomes.

Right and extended-right hepatectomies for unilobar colorectal metastases: impact of portal vein embolization on long-term outcome and liver recurrence

BACKGROUND

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is an effective procedure to increase the future remnant liver (FRL) before major hepatectomy. A controversial issue is that PVE may stimulate tumor growth and can be associated with poor prognosis after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of PVE on long-term survival following major hepatectomy for CRLM.

METHODS

Between 1998 and 2010, 100 right and extended-right hepatectomies for unilobar, right-sided CRLM were performed. Of the group, 20 patients underwent preoperative PVE (group A). The control patients (group B; 20 patients) were selected by matching with the group A patients.

RESULTS

It was found that 25 patients (25/40; 62.5%) had developed tumor recurrence. The rate of global recurrence was not significantly different in groups A and B (65% vs 60%, respectively; P = .744). The specific overall intrahepatic recurrence rate was 42.5% (17 of 40 patients) and was not significantly different in groups A and B (45% vs 40%, respectively; P = .749). The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were similar in groups A and B (42.9% and 33.6% vs 42.1% and 27.7%, respectively). The 5-year specific liver-disease-free survival was 45.3% in group A and 53.5% in group B (P = .572). On multivariate analysis of all 100 hepatectomies, R1 resection (P = .013) was found to be the only independent predictor of liver-disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that PVE did not affect overall survival and specific liver-disease-free survival in patients undergoing right or right-extended hepatectomy for unilobar, right-sided CRLM.

Designing liver resections and pushing the envelope with resections for hepatic colorectal metastases

Current concepts in the management of hepatic metastases have changed dramatically over the past two decades. Multidisciplinary therapies including chemotherapy, surgery, and regional therapy have alone and in combination significantly improved the survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Conditions that were previously considered hopeless and treated merely for palliation can now be approached with curative intent. In this paper, we review the surgical treatment for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) and describe a paradigm-shift in the management of complex heretofore-considered unresectable CRLM. Utilizing advanced multidisciplinary treatment strategies has improved the prognosis of patients with stage IV colorectal cancer to the point where we may question whether CRLM are now a chronic disease.

Single-dose radiosurgical treatment for hepatic metastases--therapeutic outcome of 138 treated lesions from a single institution

BACKGROUND

Local ablative therapies such as stereotactically guided single-dose radiotherapy or helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (tomotherapy) with high single-doses are successfully applied in many centers in patients with liver metastasis not suitable for surgical resection. This study presents results from more than 10 years of clinical experience and evaluates long-term outcome and efficacy of this therapeutic approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1997 to 2009 a total of 138 intrahepatic tumors of 90 patients were irradiated with single doses of 17 to 30 Gy (median dose 24 Gy). Median age of the patients was 64 years (range 31-89 years). Most frequent underlying tumor histologies were colorectal adenocarcinoma (70 lesions) and breast cancer (27 lesions). In 35 treatment sessions multiple targets were simultaneously irradiated (up to four lesions at once). Local progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after treatment were investigated using uni- and multiple survival regression models.

RESULTS

Median overall survival of all patients was 24.3 months. Local PFS was 87%, 70% and 59% after 6, 12 and 18 months, respectively. Median time to local progression was 25.5 months. Patients with a single lesion and no further metastases at time of RT had a favorable median PFS of 43.1 months according to the Kaplan-Meier estimator. The type of tumor showed a statistical significant influence on local PFS, with a better prognosis for breast cancer histology than for colorectal carcinoma in uni- and multiple regression analysis (p = 0.05). Multiple regression analysis revealed no influence of planning target volume (PTV), patient age and radiation dose on local PFS. Treatment was well tolerated with no severe adverse events.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms safety of SBRT in liver lesions, with 6- and 12 months local control of 87% and 70%. The dataset represents the clinical situation in a large oncology setting, with many competing treatment options and heterogeneous patient characteristics.

Electronic beam steering used with a toroidal HIFU transducer substantially increases the coagulated volume

Treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound is well established but requires extended treatment time. A device composed of 256 elements arranged on a toroidal transducer was developed to increase the coagulated volume. When all the elements are working in phase for 40 s, a volume of 6-8 cm(3) can be ablated. However, the mechanical juxtaposition of single lesions is still necessary for treating one tumor with a diameter of 2 cm. The objective of this study was to combine this toroidal transducer geometry with electronic beam steering to ablate tumors with adequate normal tissue margins and without any mechanical displacement of the high-intensity focused ultrasound device. In vitro tests demonstrated that the coagulated volume obtained from 130 s of total exposure has an average diameter of 41.4 ± 4.0 mm and an average length of 53.3 ± 6.1 mm. This single lesion can be used to treat various size of metastasis, located at depths in the liver ranging 5-45 mm.

Randomized controlled trial of cetuximab plus chemotherapy for patients with KRAS wild-type unresectable colorectal liver-limited metastases

PURPOSE

To assess the effects of cetuximab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLMs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After resection of their primary tumors, patients with KRAS wild-type synchronous nonresectable liver-limited metastases from colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy (FOLFIRI [fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan] or mFOLFOX6 [modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin]) plus cetuximab (arm A) or chemotherapy alone (arm B). The primary end point was the rate of patients converted to resection for liver metastases. Secondary end points included tumor response and survival.

RESULTS

The intent-to-treat population comprised 138 patients; 70 patients were randomly assigned to arm A and 68 to arm B. After a median of 25.0 months of follow-up, the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate and median survival time (MST) for all patients were 30% and 24.4 months, respectively. The R0 resection rates for liver metastases were 25.7% (18 of 70 patients) in arm A and 7.4% (five of 68 patients) in arm B, which were significantly different (P < .01). Patients in arm A had improved objective response rates (57.1% v 29.4%; P < .01), increased 3-year OS rate (41% v 18%; P = .013) and prolonged MST (30.9 v 21.0 months; P = .013) compared with those in arm B. In addition, in arm A, patients who had resection of liver metastases had a significantly improved MST (46.4 v 25.7 months; P < .01) compared with those who did not undergo surgery.

CONCLUSION

For patients with initially unresectable KRAS wild-type CLMs, cetuximab combined with chemotherapy improved the resectability of liver metastases and improved response rates and survival compared with chemotherapy alone.

Optimizing the role of FDG PET-CT for potentially operable metastatic colorectal cancer

Recent treatment advances now allow a realistic chance of cure in selected patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Accurate pre-treatment staging is crucial to ensure appropriate management by identification of patients with more advanced disease who will not benefit from surgery. (18)Fluorine 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) has a firmly established role in staging, restaging, and recurrence detection of a range of tumors. This article will review the role of PET-CT in patients with CRC with a particular emphasis on optimizing the technique in patients with potentially operable metastatic disease.

Clinical update: colon, rectal, and anal cancers

OBJECTIVES

To present an updated review of the incidence, risk factors, staging, diagnosis, and treatment of colon, rectal, and anal cancers, as well as nursing care associated with managing patients diagnosed with these malignancies.

DATA SOURCES

Published research reports, epidemiologic data, published patient management guidelines, and institution-based clinical tools.

CONCLUSION

While significant advances in the management of colon, rectal, and anal cancers in the past decade have extended patient survival, there remain some unanswered questions. Further clinical and molecular research will help individualize patient care, refining current therapeutic strategies and treatment decision-making aids while minimizing symptoms of disease and treatment.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses need to be familiar with risk factors, disease course, and current and emerging therapies to assist patients with treatment decision-making, and to anticipate and intervene in managing disease and treatment-induced problems. Early identification and management of distressing symptoms can help to avoid life-threatening effects and promote patient adherence to prescribed therapies; timely patient/family education may minimize anxiety and promote self-management.

A risk model to predict 90-day mortality among patients undergoing hepatic resection

BACKGROUND

Reliable criteria to predict mortality after hepatectomy remain poorly defined. We sought to identify factors associated with 90-day mortality, as well as validate the "50-50" and peak bilirubin of >7 mg/dL prediction rules for mortality after liver resection. In addition, we propose a novel integer-based score for 90-day mortality using a large cohort of patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Data from 2,056 patients who underwent liver resection at 2 major hepatobiliary centers between 1990 and 2011 were identified. Perioperative laboratory data, as well as surgical and postoperative details, were analyzed to identify factors associated with liver-related 90-day death.

RESULTS

Indications for liver resection included colorectal metastasis (39%), hepatocellular carcinoma (19%), benign mass (17%), or noncolorectal metastasis (14%). Most patients had normal underlying liver parenchyma (71%) and resection involved ≥3 segments (36%). Overall morbidity and mortality were 19% and 2%, respectively. Only 1 patient fulfilled the 50-50 criteria; this patient survived and was discharged on day 8. Twenty patients had a peak bilirubin concentration >7 mg/dL and 5 died within 90 days; the sensitivity and specificity of the >7-mg/dL rule were 25% and 99.3%, respectively, but overall accuracy was poor (area under the curve 0.574). Factors associated with 90-day mortality included international normalized ratio (odds ratio = 11.87), bilirubin (odds ratio = 1.16), and serum creatinine (odds ratio = 1.87) on postoperative day 3, as well as grade of postoperative complications (odds ratio = 5.08; all p < 0.05). Integer values were assigned to each factor to develop a model that predicted 90-day mortality (area under the curve 0.89). A score of ≥11 points had a sensitivity and specificity of 83.3% and 98.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 50-50 and bilirubin >7-mg/dL rules were not accurate in predicting 90-day mortality. Rather, a composite integer-based risk score based on postoperative day 3 international normalized ratio, bilirubin, creatinine, and complication grade more accurately predicted 90-day mortality after hepatectomy.

Surgical management of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: a multicenter international analysis

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to investigate the surgical management and outcomes of patients with primary colorectal cancer (CRC) and synchronous liver metastasis (sCRLM).

STUDY DESIGN

Using a multi-institutional database, we identified 1,004 patients treated for sCRLM between 1982 and 2011. Clinicopathologic and outcomes data were evaluated with uni- and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

A simultaneous CRC and liver operation was performed in 329 (33%) patients; 675 (67%) underwent a staged approach ("classic" staged approach, n = 647; liver-first strategy, n = 28). Patients managed with the liver-first approach had more hepatic lesions and were more likely to have bilateral disease than those in the other 2 groups (p < 0.05). The use of staged operative strategies increased over the time of the study from 58% to 75% (p < 0.001). Liver-directed therapy included hepatectomy (90%) or combined resection + ablation (10%). A major resection (>3 segments) was more common with a staged approach (39% vs 24%; p < 0.001). Overall, 509 patients (50%) received chemotherapy in either the preoperative (22%) or adjuvant (28%) settings, with 11% of patients having both. There were 197 patients (20%) who had a complication in the postoperative period, with no difference in morbidity between staged and simultaneous groups or major vs minor hepatectomies (p > 0.05). Ninety-day postoperative mortality was 3.0%, with no difference between simultaneous and staged approaches (p = 0.94). The overall median and 5-year survivals were 50.9 months and 44%, respectively; long-term survival was the same regardless of the operative approach (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous and staged resections for sCRLM can be performed with comparable morbidity, mortality, and long-term oncologic outcomes.

Defining resectability of colorectal liver metastases: how and why?

SUMMARY Treatment outcome in metastatic colorectal carcinoma has improved because of advancements in medical therapy and increased use of liver resections. In primary nonresectable disease, prognosis improves when a secondary resection is performed after successful downsizing by neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Which patient groups may profit from a secondary liver resection and which neoadjuvant systemic therapy has the optimal chance of conversion to resectability has not been defined because various patient groups were selected in different studies and there is a lack of consensus on resectability. This invalidates cross-study comparisons of resection rates and survival rates. Prospective trials in which secondary resection rate is a predefined end point are needed and will allow more insight into this topic.

Chance of cure following liver resection for initially unresectable colorectal metastases: analysis of actual 5-year survival

BACKGROUND

Survival with long-term follow-up following liver resection for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) downsized by chemotherapy has rarely been reported. The aim of this study was to determine the chance of cure following liver resection for initially unresectable CRLM.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and December 2009, 61 patients underwent hepatectomy for unresectable liver-only CRLM downsized after chemotherapy. Cure was defined as a recurrence-free interval of at least 5 years after primary hepatectomy.

RESULTS

Resectability of CRLM was achieved after a mean number of 11 courses, and 42.6 % of patients underwent liver resection after ≥10 courses. Postoperative mortality was nil, and morbidity rate was 19.7 %. The 5- and 10-year actuarial overall survival rates were 42.6 and 16.0 %. Of 30 patients with a follow-up ≥5 years, 11 were alive, yielding a 5-year actual overall survival rate of 36.7 %, and 7 (23.3 %) were considered cured because they are alive without recurrence. On multivariate analysis, response to chemotherapy was the only independent predictor of both overall and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Cure can be achieved in about 23 % of patients resected for initially unresectable CRLM downsized by chemotherapy. Liver resection can be safely performed in selected patients even after multiple courses of chemotherapy.

The role of biological agents in the resection of colorectal liver metastases

Surgically resecting liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CLMs) offers the only potentially curative option. Chemotherapy-induced downsizing of CLMs increases the proportion of patients with resectable metastases. Several recent studies have reported that adding a biological agent such as cetuximab, panitumumab or bevacizumab to chemotherapy could further increase response and resectability rates. This overview discusses the reported resection rates for biological agents combined with chemotherapy and the difficulties of cross-trial comparisons, the pre-, peri- and postoperative roles of biological agents, particularly with regards to comparisons of surgical complications, and ongoing clinical trials in which the resectability of CLMs is a predefined end point. Currently, targeted therapies combined with chemotherapy probably increase the resection rate of CLMs, although this has been shown in only one phase III randomised study and it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the relative efficacy and safety of the different available biological agents in terms of converting unresectable CLMs to resectable lesions. Available data for each of them are discussed. More data from phase III trials are expected to confirm the utility of the different biological agents in converting patients with unresectable CLMs to a resectable status.

Impact of complications on long-term survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases

Background

Postoperative complications may have an adverse effect not only on short-term but also long-term outcome among patients having surgery for cancer. A retrospective series of patients who had surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) was used to assess this association.

Methods

Patients who had surgery with curative intent for CLM from 2000 to 2009 were included. The impact of postoperative complications, patient characteristics, disease stage and treatment on long-term survival was analysed using multivariable Cox regression models.

Results

A total of 251 patients were included. The median age was 58 (interquartile range 51–68) years and there were 87 women (34·7 per cent). A minor or major postoperative complication developed in 41 and 14 patients respectively, and five patients (2·0 per cent) died after surgery. The 5-year recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival rates were 19·5 and 41·9 per cent respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that postoperative complications independently predicted shorter RFS (hazard ratio (HR) 2·36, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·56 to 3·58) and overall survival (HR 2·34, 1·46 to 3·74). Other independent predictors of shorter RFS and overall survival included lymph node metastasis, concomitant extrahepatic disease, a serum carcinoembryonic antigen level of at least 100 ng/dl, and the use of radiofrequency ablation (RFS only). The severity of complications also correlated with RFS (P = 0·006) and overall survival (P = 0·001).

Conclusion

Postoperative complications were independently associated with decreased long-term survival after surgery for CLM with curative intent. The prevention and management of postoperative adverse events may be important oncologically.

Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for peritoneal metastases combined with curative treatment of colorectal liver metastases: Systematic review of all literature and meta-analysis of observational studies

OBJECTIVE

Assess the overall outcome in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients that present with a combination of peritoneal metastases (PM) and liver metastases (CRLM) after curative resection and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the current literature.

METHODS

A systematic literature search according to the PRISMA guidelines was conducted using the PubMed database of the U.S. National library of Medicine using the keywords: colorectal cancer, liver metastasis, extra-hepatic, peritoneal metastases, peritoneal carcinomatosis, cytoreductive surgery (CRS), HIPEC and combinations hereof. Papers focussing on CRS and HIPEC for PM combined with curative treatment of CRLM were included, provided sufficient information on survival outcomes could be extracted. Duplicate publications were excluded. Meta-analysis was performed using the method described by Tierney et al.

RESULTS

After screening and full-text assessment of 39 papers, six articles were included containing data on combined PM and CRLM in patients treated with curative resection of both sites and HIPEC or early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC). Three articles provided enough statistical information for meta-analysis. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) was extracted from survival curves and was 1.24 (CI 0.96-1.60). A comparison was made with patients presenting with isolated PM undergoing CRS and HIPEC and with patients with disseminated disease undergoing (modern) systemic chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of randomized controlled studies, we found in this systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with a combination of colorectal metastases in the liver as well as in the peritoneum show a trend towards a lower overall survival after curative resection and HIPEC, when compared to patients with isolated peritoneal metastases after CRS and HIPEC (pooled HR1.24, CI 0.96-1.60). However, patients with metastatic CRC show a tendency towards increased median overall survival after CRS and HIPEC combined with resection of liver metastases when compared to treatment with modern systemic chemotherapy.

Surgical results after downstaging of initially marginal or non-resectable liver metastases

Surgery remains the best curative treatment for resectable patients with colorectal liver metastases. In patients initially considered unresectable, both refinements in surgical technique using portal vein occlusion or two-step resections and increased efficiency of chemotherapy regimen with the adjunction of antiangiogenics now allow secondary resection. Recent evidence suggests almost identical long-term survival in case of secondary downstaged lesions advocating an aggressive approach. However, these data lie on disparate and nonconsensual criteria for unresectability, which often do not gather technical and oncologic components together. Furthermore, both impaired general status and damaged underlying parenchyma as a consequence of prolonged chemotherapy to achieve resectability as well as the technical challenge required to perform adequate carcinologic resection could increase the operative risk in such patients. In our experience, a subgroup of slow chemo-responding initially unresectable patients who required preoperative liver volume modulation after ≥ 12 cycles of chemotherapy to achieve sufficient response experienced dramatically high operative risk which jeopardized postoperative chemotherapy and subsequently put these patients at increased risk of recurrence. Whether all patients preoperatively amenable to surgery using intensive chemotherapy and complex surgical strategy actually benefit from such an aggressive approach is a matter of ongoing debate, which needs a reappraisal.

Surgical options for initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases

Although the frontiers of liver resection for colorectal liver metastases have broadened in recent decades, approximately 75% of these patients present with unresectable metastases at the time of their diagnosis. In the past, these patients underwent only palliative treatment, without the chance of a cure. In the previous two decades, several therapeutic strategies have been developed that render resectable those metastases that were initially unresectable, thus offering the chance of long-term survival and even a cure to these patients. The oncosurgical modalities that are available include liver resection following portal vein ligation/embolization, “two-stage” liver resection, one-stage ultrasonically guided liver resection, hepatectomy following conversion chemotherapy, and liver resection combined with thermal ablation. Moreover, in recent years, certain authors have recommended the revisiting of the concept of liver transplantation in highly selected patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases and favorable prognostic factors. By employing such therapies, the number of patients with colorectal liver metastases who undergo a potentially curative treatment could increase to 40%. The safety profile of these approaches is acceptable (morbidity rates as high as 45%, mortality rates of less than 5%). Furthermore, the 5-year survival rates (approximately 30%) are significantly increased over those that were achieved with palliative treatment.

Resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer: where we are now and where do we go from here?

SUMMARY Liver metastases from colorectal cancer represent a peculiar clinical scenario in everyday practice, since treatment should achieve long-term survival or even a cure in selected patients. Presentation may vary between single cases, ranging from easily resectable lesions to more advanced metastatic spreading for which surgery can only be considered after major tumor shrinkage. For resectable liver metastases, surgery remains the essential step in the curative approach to the disease, even though different ablative procedures may be considered as valuable alternatives in certain subsets. Postoperative or perioperative chemotherapy may further improve long-term outcome, even though treatment benefits and harms related to liver toxicity should be carefully balanced in each patient. A comprehensive multidisciplinary assessment of patient- and tumor-related features remains the key to complement the clinical aspects with the biological characterization in the framework of a personalized therapeutic approach.

Effect of metabolic syndrome on perioperative outcomes after liver surgery: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) analysis

BACKGROUND

The problem of obesity has risen to epidemic levels in the United States. A subset of patients with obesity will have metabolic syndrome. We sought to examine the impact of metabolic syndrome on the risk of morbidity and mortality among a large cohort of patients who underwent hepatic resection.

METHODS

Patients included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) dataset who underwent hepatic resection between January 2005 and December 2008 were identified. Data on clinical characteristics, comorbidities, operative details, as well as postoperative complications and mortality were collected and analyzed. Patients with BMI >30 kg/m(2) who also had hypertension and diabetes were defined as having metabolic syndrome.

RESULTS

A total of 3,973 patients who underwent a liver resection were identified. Overall mean body mass index was 28 kg/m(2); 31.7% patients were obese (>30 kg/m(2)). Of the patients who were obese, 256 (20%) had metabolic syndrome. Patients with metabolic syndrome were less likely to have had a major hepatectomy (≥hemi-hepatectomy, 36% vs 43%; P = .01) but had a greater mean number of red blood cell transfusions (1.6 vs 1; P = .02). The incidence of postoperative complications after hepatectomy was 23%. Patients with metabolic syndrome had a greater risk for reintubation (odds ratio [OR] 1.9; P = .02), >48 hours ventilator dependence (OR 2.0; P = .003), myocardial infarction (OR 5.5; P = .01) and superficial surgical-site infections (OR 1.7; P = .02) compared with nonmetabolic patients. Overall postoperative mortality was 3%. Metabolic syndrome was associated with an increased risk of postoperative death (OR 2.7; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

The presence of metabolic syndrome was associated with a greater risk of perioperative complications. In addition, patients with metabolic syndrome had greater than a 2-fold increased risk of death after hepatic resection.

Survival of patients operated for colorectal liver metastases and concomitant extra-hepatic disease: external validation of a prognostic model

BACKGROUND

The presence of extra-hepatic disease (EHD) is no longer an absolute contraindication to surgery in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Recently, a novel prognostic model predicting overall survival in such patients was proposed using five risk factors (EHD other than isolated lung metastases, CEA ≥10 ng/ml, >5 liver metastases, right colon as the primary CRC location, and diagnosis of EHD concomitant to CRLM recurrence). A bi-institutional database was used to perform an external validation of this model.

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients operated for CRLM and EHD between 1982 and 2011 in two institutions was analyzed. The proposed prognostic model was validated in this cohort using Cox proportional hazards models and the concordance index (c).

RESULTS

Of the five proposed risk factors, only EHD other than isolated lung metastases was found to independently predict overall survival [Hazards Ratio (HR) = 2.10 (95% CI: 1.01-4.40)]. Although, the number of risk factors was marginally associated with overall survival in univariate analysis (P = 0.049), the performance of the proposed prognostic model was poor when applied to our cohort (c = 0.64).

CONCLUSION

The examined prognostic model of survival in patients with CRLM and EHD had poor performance. Further research is warranted to delineate the subset of patients who will benefit from surgery.

Scoring system predictive of survival for patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver tumors

Background

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment option for liver tumors. This study evaluated outcomes after SBRT to identify prognostic variables and to develop a novel scoring system predictive of survival.

Methods

The medical records of 52 patients with a total of 85 liver lesions treated with SBRT from 2003 to 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-four patients had 1 lesion; 27 had 2 or more. Thirteen lesions were primary tumors; 72 were metastases. Fiducials were placed in all patients prior to SBRT. The median prescribed dose was 30 Gy (range, 16 – 50 Gy) in a median of 3 fractions (range, 1–5).

Results

With median follow-up of 11.3 months, median overall survival (OS) was 12.5 months, and 1 year OS was 50.8%. In 42 patients with radiographic follow up, 1 year local control was 74.8%. On univariate analysis, number of lesions (p = 0.0243) and active extralesional disease (p < 0.0001) were predictive of OS; Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) approached statistical significance (p = 0.0606). A scoring system for predicting survival was developed by allocating 1 point for each of the three following factors: active extralesional disease, 2 or more lesions, and KPS ≤ 80%. Score was associated with OS (p < 0.0001). For scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3, median survival intervals were 34, 12.5, 7.6, and 2.8 months, respectively.

Conclusions

SBRT offers a safe and feasible treatment option for liver tumors. A prognostic scoring system based on the number of liver lesions, activity of extralesional disease, and KPS predicts survival following SBRT and can be used as a guide for prospective validation and ultimately for treatment decision-making.

Combined portal vein embolization and preoperative chemotherapy prior to liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases

OBJECTIVE

Compare perioperative course and long-term mortality after liver resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases between patients who had preoperative treatment with portal vein embolization (PVE) and chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone.

METHODS

Among patients undergoing liver resection for CRC metastases following preoperative chemotherapy treatment, 17 patients who had received preoperative PVE (group A) were compared with 17 matched controls who had no PVE (group B). Perioperative course and long-term mortality were compared between groups A and B and between group A and the entire group of 75 cases with preoperative chemotherapy (group C).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics for the matched groups A and B were similar. Group C included less major resections. Median intraoperative bleeding was 1600 ml in group A, 1200 ml in group B, and 1000 ml in group C (p < 0.05 vs. group A). Median postoperative stay was comparable in all groups (8-9 days). Operation time was 542 min in group A and 464 min in group B (p < 0.01). Mortality after 30 days and 1, 2, and 5 years was similar in all groups.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative outcome and long-term survival did not differ when comparing liver resection for CRC liver metastases preceded by PVE and chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone, except for the operation time. The study supports the safety of this "aggressive" combination approach in patients in need of tumor "downstaging" by chemotherapy and PVE to increase the remnant liver volume.

Risk of morbidity and mortality following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery

INTRODUCTION

Hepatic, pancreatic, and complex biliary (HPB) surgery can be associated with major morbidity and significant mortality. For the past 5 years, the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) has gathered robust data on patients undergoing HPB surgery. We sought to use the ACS-NSQIP data to determine which preoperative variables were predictive of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing HPB surgery.

METHODS

Data collected from ACS-NSQIP on patients undergoing hepatic, pancreatic, or complex biliary surgery between 2005 and 2009 were analyzed (n = 13,558). Diagnoses and surgical procedures were categorized into 10 and eight groups, respectively. Seventeen preoperative clinical variables were assessed for prediction of 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to develop a risk model.

RESULTS

Of the 13,558 patients who underwent an HPB procedure, 7,321 (54%) had pancreatic, 4,881 (36%) hepatic, and 1,356 (10%) biliary surgery. Overall, 70.3% of patients had a cancer diagnosis. Post-operative complications occurred in 3,850 patients for an overall morbidity of 28.4%. Serious complications occurred in 2,522 (18.6%) patients; 366 patients died for an overall peri-operative mortality of 2.7%. Peri-operative outcome was associated with diagnosis and type of procedure. Hepatic trisectionectomy (5.8%) and total pancreatectomy (5.4%) had the highest 30-day mortality. Of the preoperative variables examined, age >74, dyspnea with moderate exertion, steroid use, prior cardiac procedure, ascites, and pre-operative sepsis were associated with morbidity and mortality (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

While overall morbidity and mortality for HPB surgery are low, peri-operative outcomes are heterogeneous and depend on diagnosis, procedure type, and key clinical factors. By combining these factors, an ACS-NSQIP "HPB Risk Calculator" may be developed in the future to help better risk-stratify patients being considered for complex HPB surgery.

What is the potential role of hepatic arterial infusion chemo-therapy in the current armamentorium against colorectal cancer

The management of colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases is a common clinical problem. If patients can undergo resection of liver metastases, long-term survival can be achieved. Converting a patient from unresectable to resectable, however, remains a major challenge. The majority of patients who undergo liver resection for colorectal metastases recur; therefore, adjuvant treatment following resection should be considered. Emerging literature suggests that hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) can be combined with systemic chemotherapy. Both therapies can be given at nearly full doses, thus improving resectability and outcomes for patients with colorectal liver metastases. HAI plus systemic can also be a useful option for adjuvant treatment after hepatic resection.

Preoperative imaging for hepatic resection of colorectal cancer metastasis

Despite recent advances in chemotherapeutic agents, the prognosis for metastatic colon cancer remains poor. Over the past two decades, hepatic metastasectomy has emerged as a promising technique for improving survival in patients with metastatic colon cancer and in some cases providing long-term cure. To maximize safety and efficacy of metastasectomy, appropriate pre-operative imaging is needed. Advancements in computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) have led to improved detection of occult lesions and better definition of surgical anatomy. While CT, PET and MRI have a comparable sensitivity for detection of large liver metastases, MRI excels at detection of subcentimeter liver metastases compared to CT and FDG-PET, especially with the combination of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and hepatocyte-specific contrast agents. CT may be useful as a screening modality or in preoperative planning such as volumetric estimation of the remnant liver size or in defining preoperative arterial anatomy for hepatic artery infusion pump placement. While technologic advancements have led to unprecedented image quality and clarity, this does not replace the need for a dedicated, competent radiologist with experience in hepatic imaging.

Thermal tumor ablation therapy for colorectal cancer hepatic metastasis

Surgical resection for colorectal hepatic metastases (CRHM) is the preferred treatment for suitable candidates, and the only potentially curative modality. However, due to various limitations, the majority of patients with CRHM are not candidates for liver resection. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in the role of thermal tumor ablation (TTA) as a component of combined resection-ablation strategies, staged hepatic resections, or as standalone adjunct treatment for patients with CRHM. Thus, ablative approaches have expanded the group of patients with CRHM that may benefit from liver-directed treatment strategies.

Different metastatic pattern according to the KRAS mutational status and site-specific discordance of KRAS status in patients with colorectal cancer

Background

We evaluated the association between a KRAS mutational status and various clinicopathologic features including the metastatic pattern in patients with metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer (MRCRC). The concordance rates of the KRAS status between primary tumor sites and paired metastatic organs were also analyzed.

Methods

The KRAS mutational status in codons 12, 13, and 61 from formalin-fixed sections of both primary tumors and related metastases was determined by sequencing analysis. One hundred forty-three Korean patients with MRCRC with available tissues (resection or biopsy) from both primary tumors and related metastatic sites were consecutively enrolled.

Results

The KRAS mutation rate was 52.4% (75/143) when considering both the primary and metastatic sites. When the relationship between the KRAS status and initial metastatic sites at the time of diagnosis of MRCRC was analyzed, lung metastasis was more frequent as the initial metastatic site in patients with the KRAS mutation than in patients without the KRAS mutation (45.3% vs. 22.1%; P = 0.003). However, liver (37.3% vs. 70.6%; P < 0.001) or distant lymph node metastases (6.7% vs. 19.1%; P = 0.025) were less frequent as the initial metastatic organ in patients with the KRAS mutation than in patients without the KRAS mutation. The discordance rate of KRAS mutational status between primary and paired metastatic sites other than the lung was 12.3% (13/106). Compared with primary tumor sites, the KRAS discordance rate was significantly higher in matched lung metastases [32.4% (12/37)] than in other matched metastatic organs (P = 0.005).

Conclusions

Organs initially involved by distant metastasis were different according to the KRAS mutational status in MRCRC patients. The concordance rate (87.7%) of the KRAS mutation status at metastatic sites other than the lung was generally high compared with primary tumor sites; however, lung metastasis had a high rate of KRAS discordance (32.4%).

Comparison of radiofrequency ablation and resection for hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been mostly used as a therapeutic alternative to hepatic resection for treating liver metastasis of colorectal cancer. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether there were differences in outcome between RFA and surgical resection in the treatment of colorectal cancer with liver metastases.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 53 patients who underwent only hepatic resection or only RFA for colorectal liver metastases. Twenty-five patients who underwent hepatic resection were compared with 28 patients who underwent RFA for synchronous or metachronous liver metastases.

RESULTS

The median CEA level at the time of diagnosis of liver metastases was significantly higher in the resection group (14.2 ng/mL vs. 2.8 ng/mL, p=0.002). The median size of main liver metastases was significantly larger in the resection group (4.0 cm vs. 2.05 cm, p=0.002). There was no difference in the percentage of patients experiencing major complication (one patient in each group). The marginal recurrence rate was significantly higher in the RFA group (p=0.004). Disease-free and overall survival were longer in the resection group (p=0.008 and 0.017, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only the type of treatment was a factor associated with disease-free and overall survival (p=0.004 and 0.007, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the high marginal recurrence rate, RFA shows an inferior outcome in comparison with surgical resection. Therefore, RFA should be considered for only selected patients with unresectable (by any means) disease or with high operative risk.

Resection margin with anatomic or nonanatomic hepatectomy for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

When hepatectomy is used as a primary treatment for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRCLM), the balance between surgical curability and functional preservation of the remnant liver is of great importance.

METHODS

A total of 108 patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for CRCLM were retrospectively analyzed with respect to tumor extent, operative method, and prognosis, including recurrence.

RESULTS

The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates (OS) for all patients were 90.5%, 77.8%, 63.2%, and 51.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level after hepatectomy (<36 or ≥36 mAU/mL) and presence of recurrence as independent prognostic factors of OS (P = 0.0458 and 0.0249, respectively), and tumor depth of colorectal cancer (<se (a2) vs. ≥se (a2)) and serum CA 19-9 level after hepatectomy as the significant factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.0025 and 0.00138, respectively). Neither resection margin nor type of hepatectomy (anatomic or nonanatomic) for CRCLM was a significant prognostic factor for OS or DFS or CRCLM recurrence, including intrahepatic recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In CRCLM, we believe that nonanatomic hepatectomy with narrow margin is indicated, and optimal treatment would include functional preservation of as much of the remnant liver as possible.

Serum metabolomic profile as a means to distinguish stage of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Presently, colorectal cancer (CRC) is staged preoperatively by radiographic tests, and postoperatively by pathological evaluation of available surgical specimens. However, present staging methods do not accurately identify occult metastases. This has a direct effect on clinical management. Early identification of metastases isolated to the liver may enable surgical resection, whereas more disseminated disease may be best treated with palliative chemotherapy.

METHODS

Sera from 103 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma treated at the same tertiary cancer center were analyzed by proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy and gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS). Metabolic profiling was done using both supervised pattern recognition and orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (O-PLS-DA) of the most significant metabolites, which enables comparison of the whole sample spectrum between groups. The metabolomic profiles generated from each platform were compared between the following groups: locoregional CRC (N = 42); liver-only metastases (N = 45); and extrahepatic metastases (N = 25).

RESULTS

The serum metabolomic profile associated with locoregional CRC was distinct from that associated with liver-only metastases, based on 1H NMR spectroscopy (P = 5.10 × 10-7) and GC-MS (P = 1.79 × 10-7). Similarly, the serum metabolomic profile differed significantly between patients with liver-only metastases and with extrahepatic metastases. The change in metabolomic profile was most markedly demonstrated on GC-MS (P = 4.75 × 10-5).

CONCLUSIONS

In CRC, the serum metabolomic profile changes markedly with metastasis, and site of disease also appears to affect the pattern of circulating metabolites. This novel observation may have clinical utility in enhancing staging accuracy and selecting patients for surgical or medical management. Additional studies are required to determine the sensitivity of this approach to detect subtle or occult metastatic disease.

Impact of preoperative targeted therapy on postoperative complications after resection of colorectal liver metastases

PURPOSE

The impact of chemotherapy (CTx) on morbidity after liver resection for colorectal metastases (CRC-LM) has been increasingly investigated during recent years. Biologic agents like bevacizumab (BEV) or cetuximab (CET) are now added as "targeted therapy" (TT), also in neoadjuvant settings. Initial series could demonstrate the safety of those regimens in liver resection but data are still scarce. We evaluated the impact of CTx with BEV or CET (CTx + TT) on perioperative morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-seven patients who underwent liver resections for CRC-LM after chemotherapy before surgery since 1999 were included. One hundred eighty-five patients (78%) had preoperative CTx regimen without biologic agents (fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, or irinotecan-based) and 52 (22%) had CTx + TT (39 BEV, 11 CET, 2 CET/BEV). After preoperative CTx + TT, a time interval of at least 4-6 weeks and a residual liver volume of >35% before surgery were required.

RESULTS

Hemihepatectomy or more was performed in about half of the patients. The median amount of intraoperatively transfused blood was 0 ml in both groups (p = 0.34). Overall mortality was 1.7% and slightly elevated in patients with CTx + TT (3.8% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.17). Any complication occurred in (CTx + TT vs. CTx) 52% and 46%, respectively (p = 0.47). The rates of liver failure (9.6% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.98), infectious complications such as wound infection (19% vs. 16%, p = 0.62) and abdominal abscess (8% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.71), as well as the rate of relaparotomies (11.5% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.29) showed no significant differences between the groups with TT or without. In multivariate analyses, neither type nor duration of CTx nor the time interval between CTx and surgery showed any influence on complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm the safety of targeted therapy before liver resection for CRC-LM. This effect may in part be due to our treatment policy (time interval to resection and residual liver volume) after intensive preoperative CTx.

Chemotherapy and target therapy as neo-adjuvant approach for initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases

Although surgery is the most effective treatment for liver metastases in colorectal cancer patients, only 15-20% of these patients are suitable for a radical surgical approach, and metastases recurrence may occur at follow up. In the last decade, the use of pre-operative chemotherapy in combination with new biological drugs has been introduced. We reviewed data of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy strategies aimed at increasing the resection rate of liver metastases in colorectal cancer patients who were initially considered unresectable.

Therapeutic potential of surgery for metastatic colorectal cancer

Evidence of the clinical benefit of surgery or metastasectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer to disease sites including the liver, lung, peritoneum, and pelvis as a potentially curative option is now available in the literature. The oncologic outcome of this treatment strategy achieves 5-year survival ranging between 20% and 50%. These survival gains have not been previously observed in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer. Treatment of potential surgical candidates requires a combined modality approach with systemic therapies to achieve macroscopic tumor removal and microscopic targeting of tumor deposits to achieve disease control. In nonsurgical candidates, systemic therapy, radiation therapy, and interventional oncology procedures may potentially facilitate sufficient disease downstaging for surgery. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the therapeutic advances in the surgical management of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: analysis of safety, feasibility, and early outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the U.S. Many patients with CRC develop hepatic metastases as the sole site of metastases. Historical treatment options were limited to resection or conventional radiation therapy. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a rational treatment approach. This study reviews our experience with SBRT for patients with liver metastases from CRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen histologically confirmed hepatic CRC metastases in 11 consecutive patients were identified between November, 2004 and June, 2009 at Georgetown University. All patients underwent CT-based treatment planning; a few also had MRI or PET/CT. All patients had fiducial markers placed under CT guidance and were treated using the CyberKnife system. Treatment response and toxicities were examined; survival and local control were evaluated.

RESULTS

Most patients were treated to a single hepatic lesion (n = 8), with a few treated to two lesions (n = 3). Median treatment volume was 99.7 cm(3), and lesions were treated to a median BED(10) of 49.7 Gy (range: 28-100.8 Gy). Median follow-up was 21 months; median survival was 16.1 months, with 2 year actuarial survival of 25.7%. One year local control was 72%. Among patients with post-treatment imaging, eight had stable disease (80%) and two had progressive disease (20%) at first follow-up. The most common grade 1-2 acute toxicities included nausea and alterations in liver function tests; there was one grade 3 toxicity (elevated bilirubin), and no grade 4-5 toxicities.

DISCUSSION

SBRT is safe and feasible for the treatment of limited hepatic metastases from CRC. Our results compare favorably with outcomes from previous studies of SBRT. Further studies are needed to better define patient eligibility, study the role of combined modality treatment, optimize treatment parameters, and characterize quality of life after treatment.

Visualisation of liver tumours using hand-held real-time strain imaging: results of animal experiments

OBJECTIVE

Surgical resection is the only curative option for colorectal hepatic metastases. Intra-operative localisation of these metastases during hepatic resection is performed by intra-operative B-mode imaging and palpation. Because liver metastases are stiffer than normal tissues, elastography may be a useful complement to B-mode imaging. This paper reports quantitative measures of the image quality attained during intra-operative real-time elastographic visualisation of liver metastasis.

METHODS

VX2 tumours were implanted in the liver of eight rabbits and were scanned in vivo. Measurements of the tumour dimensions obtained via elastography were compared with those obtained using B-mode imaging and with gross pathology.

RESULTS

Measurements of tumour diameters were similar when obtained by intra-operative elastography and pathological measurement methods (mean difference±standard deviation, 0.1±0.9 mm). The contrast between tumours and normal tissues was significantly higher (p<0.05) in elastograms (26±10 dB contrast) than in sonograms (1±1 dB contrast). Sensitivity and specificity for detecting tumours using intra-operative elastography were 100% and 88%, respectively, and positive and negative predictive values were 89% and 100%, respectively. In two cases elastograms were able to detect a tumour that was ambiguous in B-mode images.

CONCLUSION

Combined hand-held B-mode/strain imaging may provide additional information that is relevant for detection of liver metastases that may be missed by standard B-mode imaging alone, such as small and/or isoechoic tumours.

Multi-modality treatment of colorectal liver metastases

Liver metastases synchronously or metachronously occur in approximately 50% of colorectal cancer patients. Multimodality comprehensive treatment is the best therapeutic strategy for these patients. However, the optimal pattern of multimodality therapy is still controversial, and it raises several significant concerns. Liver resection is the most important treatment for colorectal liver metastases. The definition of resectability has shifted to focus on the completion of R0 resection and normal liver function maintenance. The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy still needs to be clarified. The management of either progression or complete remission during neoadjuvant chemotherapy is challenging. The optimal sequencing of surgery and chemotherapy in synchronous colorectal liver metastases patients is still unclear. Conversional chemotherapy, portal vein embolization, two-stage resection, and tumor ablation are effective approaches to improve resectability for initially unresectable patients. Several technical issues and concerns related to these methods need to be further explored. For patients with definitely unresectable liver disease, the necessity of resecting the primary tumor is still debatable, and evaluating and predicting the efficacy of targeted therapy deserve further investigation. This review discusses different patterns and important concerns of multidisciplinary treatment of colorectal liver metastases.

Current state of surgical treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer

Hepatic resection is the procedure of choice for curative treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Objectives of surgical strategy are low intraoperative blood loss, short liver ischemic times and minor postoperative morbidity and mortality. Blood loss is an independent predictor of mortality and compromises, in common with postoperative complications, long-term outcome after hepatectomy for CLM. The type of liver resection has no impact on the outcome of patients with CLM; wedge resections are not inferior to anatomical resections in terms of tumor clearance, pattern of recurrence or survival. Despite the lack of proof of survival benefit, routine lymphadenectomy has been advocated, allowing the detection of microscopic lymph node metastases and with prognostic value. In experienced hands, minimally invasive liver surgery is safe with acceptable morbidity and mortality and oncological results comparable to open hepatic surgery, but with reduced blood loss and earlier recovery. The European Colorectal Metastases Treatment Group recommended treating up front with chemotherapy for patients with both resectable and unresectable CLM. However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can induce damage to the remnant liver, dependent on the number of chemotherapy cycles. Therefore, in our opinion, preoperative chemotherapy should be reserved for patients whose CLM are marginally resectable or unresectable. A meta analysis of randomized trials dealing with perioperative chemotherapy for the treatment of resectable CLM demonstrated a benefit of systemic chemotherapy but did not answer the question of whether a neoadjuvant or adjuvant approach should be preferred. Analysis of the literature demonstrates that the results of specialized centers cannot be attained in the reality of comprehensive patient care. Reasons behind the commonly poorer results seen in cancer networks as compared with literature-based data are, on the one hand, geographical disparities in access to specialized surgical and medical care. On the other hand, a selection bias in the reports of the literature may be assumed. Studies of surgical resection for CLM derive almost exclusively from case series generally drawn from large academic centers where patient selection or surgical expertise is superior to what is found in many communities. Therefore, we may conclude that the comprehensive propagation of the standards outlined in this paper constitutes a major task in the near future to reduce the variations in survival of patients with CLM.

Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging versus contrast-enhanced 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of colorectal liver metastases

PURPOSE

: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) on a 3-T system and integrated contrast-enhanced F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CE-PET/CT) for the detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

: The approval from the institutional review board was obtained, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. We retrospectively evaluated 135 metastases in 68 patients (37 men, 31 women; mean age: 68 years; age range: 37-82 years) who underwent both EOB-MRI and CE-PET/CT. A total of 103 metastases were confirmed during surgery and 32 were confirmed by imaging findings during follow-up. The images were independently reviewed by 2 observers. The diagnostic accuracies of EOB-MRI and CE-PET/CT were determined by calculating the areas under each reader-specific receiver operating characteristic curve (Az). Patient-based lesion sensitivity and specificity were compared using the McNemar test.

RESULTS

: The mean area under the Az on EOB-MRI versus CE-PET/CT was 0.94 versus 0.81 for all lesions (P < 0.001), 0.92 versus 0.60 for lesions ≤1 cm in size (P < 0.001), and 0.88 versus 0.96 for lesions >1 cm (P = 0.098), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive value on a patient basis were 100%, 71%, 97%, and 100% for EOB-MRI and 93%, 71%, 97%, and 57% for CE-PET/CT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

: EOB-MRI using a 3-T system is more accurate than CE-PET/CT, especially for the detection of small (≤1.0 cm) lesions. Patient-based analysis revealed that EOB-MRI has a higher sensitivity and negative predictive value than CE-PET/CT.

Hepatectomy and resection of concomitant extrahepatic disease for colorectal liver metastases--a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Recent data suggest that hepatectomy for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) with concomitant extrahepatic disease (EHD) achieve encouraging survival result. The authors examine the clinical efficacy of this treatment approach through a systematic review of the published literature.

METHODS

Electronic search of the MEDLINE and PubMed databases (January 2000 to January 2011) to identify studies reporting outcomes of hepatectomy for CLM with resection of EHD was undertaken. Two reviewers independently appraised each study using a predetermined protocol. Clinical efficacy was synthesised through a narrative review with full tabulation of results of all included studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were examined. This comprised 1142 patients. The median disease-free survival was 12 (range, 4-22) months, median overall survival was 30 (range, 14-44) months and median 5-year survival rate was 19% (range, 0-42%). Median 5-year survival of patients with R0 hepatectomy with resection of EHD was 25% (range, 19-36%). Survival based on site of EHD include lung; median survival (M/S) was 41 (range, 32-46) months, porto-caval lymph node; M/S was 25 (range, 19-48) months, peritoneal metastases; M/S was 25 (range, 18-32) months.

CONCLUSION

In the era of effective systemic therapies, surgical resection of CLM and concomitant EHD in carefully selected patients may achieve survival results superior to non-surgically treated patients. This treatment strategy may be considered appropriate especially when a R0 hepatectomy and complete resection of EHD may be achieved.

External validation of a pre-operative nomogram predicting peri-operative mortality risk after liver resections for malignancy

AIM

A pre-operative nomogram using a population-based database to predict peri-operative mortality risk after liver resections for malignancy has recently been developed. The aim of the present study was to perform an external validation of the nomogram using data from a high volume institution.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2000-2004) was used initially to construct the nomogram. The dataset for external validation was obtained from a high volume centre specializing in hepatobiliary surgery. Validation was performed using calibration plots and concordance index.

RESULTS

A total of 794 patients who underwent liver resection from the years 2000-2010 at the external institute were included in the validation set with an observed mortality rate of 1.6%. The mean total points for this sample of patients was 124.9 [standard error (SE) 1.8, range 0-383] which translates to a nomogram predicted mortality rate of 1.5%, similar to the actual observed overall mortality rate. The nomogram concordance index was 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.82] and calibration plots stratified by quartiles revealed good agreement between the predicted and observed mortality rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provides an external validation of the pre-operative nomogram to predict the risk of peri-operative mortality after liver resection for malignancy.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic ultrasonography for hepatic surgery

INTRODUCTION

This study describes and evaluates a novel, robot-assisted laparoscopic ultrasonographic device for hepatic surgery. Laparoscopic liver surgery is being performed with increasing frequency. One major drawback of this approach is the limited capability of intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) using standard laparoscopic devices. Robotic surgery systems offer the opportunity to develop new tools to improve techniques in minimally invasive surgery. This study evaluates a new integrated ultrasonography (US) device with the da Vinci Surgical System for laparoscopic visualization, comparing it with conventional handheld laparoscopic IOUS for performing key tasks in hepatic surgery.

METHODS

A prototype laparoscopic IOUS instrument was developed for the da Vinci Surgical System and compared with a conventional laparoscopic US device in simulation tasks: (1) In vivo porcine hepatic visualization and probe manipulation, (2) lesion detection accuracy, and (3) biopsy precision. Usability was queried by poststudy questionnaire.

RESULTS

The robotic US proved better than conventional laparoscopic US in liver surface exploration (85% success vs 73%; P = .030) and tool manipulation (79% vs 57%; P = .028), whereas no difference was detected in lesion identification (63 vs 58; P = .41) and needle biopsy tasks (57 vs 48; P = .11). Subjects found the robotic US to facilitate better probe positioning (80%), decrease fatigue (90%), and be more useful overall (90%) on the post-task questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

We found this robot-assisted IOUS system to be practical and useful in the performance of important tasks required for hepatic surgery, outperforming free-hand laparoscopic IOUS for certain tasks, and was more subjectively usable to the surgeon. Systems such as this may expand the use of robotic surgery for complex operative procedures requiring IOUS.

The liver-first approach for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: a 5-year single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

For patients who present with synchronous colorectal carcinoma and colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), a reversed treatment sequence in which the CRLM are resected before the primary carcinoma has been proposed (liver-first approach). The aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility and outcome of this approach for synchronous CRLM.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2010, 22 patients were planned to undergo the liver-first approach. Feasibility and outcomes were prospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 22 patients planned to undergo the liver-first strategy, the approach was completed in 18 patients (81.8%). The main reason for treatment failure was disease progression. Patients who completed treatment and patients who deviated from the protocol had a similar location of the primary tumour, as well as comparable size, number and distribution of CRLM (all P > 0.05). Post-operative morbidity and mortality were 27.3% and 0% following liver resection and 44.4% and 5.6% after colorectal surgery, respectively. On an intention-to-treat-basis, overall 3-year survival was 41.1%. However, 37.5% of patients who completed the treatment had developed recurrent disease at the time of the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The liver-first approach is feasible in approximately four-fifths of patients and can be performed with peri-operative mortality and morbidity similar to the traditional treatment paradigm. Patients treated with this novel strategy derive a considerable overall-survival-benefit, although disease-recurrence-rates remain relatively high, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach.