Left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: multicentre experience with the AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug

Detection of Device-Related Thrombosis Following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Background:

Device-related thrombosis (DRT) following left atrial appendage occlusion is a rare but feared complication. The diagnostic value of cardiac compute tomography (CT) for detection of DRT is unknown. This study sought to evaluate the clinical value of cardiac CT for detection of DRT using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as the reference standard and to provide insights into the causes, natural history, and risk of DRT.

Methods:

We reviewed 301 consecutive patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, between 2010 and 2017. Of these, 248 patients had cardiac CT and TEE imaging available at 8-week follow-up; 139 had complete 12-month imaging. A blinded investigator analyzed all images. On TEE, an echo-dense mass attached to the device was defined as DRT. Cardiac CT was analyzed for presence of hypoattenuated thickening (HAT) on the device, which was subclassified as low grade or high grade. High-grade HAT was considered as definite DRT.

Results:

At 8 weeks, TEE detected 5 (2%) cases with DRT; and cardiac CT 6 (2.4%) cases with high-grade HAT. At 12 months, both TEE and cardiac CT detected 2 (1.4%) cases with DRT or high-grade HAT, respectively. Cardiac CT demonstrated low-grade HAT in 9 (3.6%) cases at 8 weeks; and 13 cases (9.4%) at 12-months. High-grade HAT/DRT was associated with thromboembolism in 2 cases, whereas low-grade HAT was not related to embolic events. Low-grade HAT resolved spontaneously over time.

Conclusions:

Cardiac CT seems equally good as TEE for detection of DRT. In addition, cardiac CT demonstrates cases with low-grade HAT, not visualized by TEE. The clinical significance hereof requires further investigation.

Device Thrombosis After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Is Related to Patient and Procedural Characteristics but Not to Duration of Postimplantation Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

BACKGROUND

Device-related thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage occlusion is a worrisome finding with little knowledge about when to expect it and how to prevent it. This study sought to investigate correlates of DRT after left atrial appendage occlusion, its time of diagnosis, and particularly, association with postimplantation dual antiplatelet therapy duration.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients (n=102) after left atrial appendage occlusion with AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug/Amulet (n=59) or WATCHMAN (n=43) were included in a prospective registry (October 2011-May 2016). Follow-up was done at 1.5, 3 to 6, and 12 months postimplantation. DRT was classified as early (at 1.5 month), late (at 3-6 month), or very late (at 12-month follow-up). Postimplantation dual antiplatelet therapy was recommended for 30 to 180 days and decided independently by attending physicians. Final analysis included 99 patients, 42 (42.4%) females, with median CHA₂DS₂-VASc of 4.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 3.0-5.0) and median HAS-BLED score of 2.0 (IQR, 1.0-3.0). DRTs were observed in 7 (7.1%) patients: 2 (28.6%) early, 2 (28.6%) late, and 3 (42.9%) very late. When compared with patients without DRT, those with DRT presented more often with a history of prior thromboembolism (5 [71.4%] versus 28 [30.4%]; P=0.04), had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (50.0 [IQR, 35.0-55.0] versus 60.0 [IQR, 55.0-66.0]; P<0.01), and had greater proportion of patients with deep device implantation (6 [85.7%] versus 36 [39.1%]; P=0.04) and with larger devices implanted (30.0 mm [IQR, 27.0-33.0] versus 25.0 mm [IQR, 24.0-28.0]; P<0.01). Postimplantation dual antiplatelet therapy duration was not different between the 2 groups (12.4 weeks [IQR, 6.0-49.7] with DRT versus 13.0 weeks [IQR, 7.3-26.0] without DRT; P=0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world series, DRT was observed early, late, and very late after left atrial appendage occlusion. It was related to patient and procedural characteristics but not to postimplantation dual antiplatelet therapy duration.

Device-Related Thrombosis After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is an alternative strategy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the incidence, predictors, and prognosis of thrombus formation on devices in patients with AF who were treated with LAA closure.

METHODS

The study retrospectively analyzed data from patients treated with 2 LAA closure devices seen in 8 centers in France from February 2012 to January 2017.

RESULTS

A total of 469 consecutive patients with AF underwent LAA closure (272 Watchman devices [Atritech, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts] and 197 Amplatzer devices [St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, Minnesota]). Mean follow-up was 13 ± 13 months, during which 339 (72.3%) patients underwent LAA imaging at least once. There were 98 major adverse events (26 thrombi on devices, 19 ischemic strokes, 2 transient ischemic attacks, 18 major hemorrhages, 33 deaths) recorded in 89 patients. The incidence of device-related thrombus in patients with LAA imaging was 7.2% per year. Older age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.07 per 1-year increase; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.14; p = 0.02) and history of stroke (HR: 3.68; 95% CI: 1.17 to 11.62; p = 0.03) were predictors of thrombus formation on the devices, whereas dual antiplatelet therapy (HR: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.76; p = 0.03) and oral anticoagulation at discharge (HR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.77; p = 0.02) were protective factors. Thrombus on the device (HR: 4.39; 95% CI: 1.05 to 18.43; p = 0.04) and vascular disease (HR: 5.03; 95% CI: 1.39 to 18.23; p = 0.01) were independent predictors of ischemic strokes and transient ischemic attacks during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombus formation on the device is not uncommon in patients with AF who are treated by LAA closure. Such events are strongly associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke during follow-up. (REgistry on Real-Life EXperience With Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion [RELEXAO]; NCT03279406).

Left atrial appendage closure in atrial fibrillation patients with prior major bleeding or ineligible for oral anticoagulation

Aims

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) reduces the ischaemic stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but in turn leads to an increased risk of adverse bleeding events. Alternatively, left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) using a mechanical device might overcome these bleeding complications. However, evidence regarding LAAC in patients at high bleeding risk is scarce. This study evaluates the clinical features of AF patients with previous bleeding that underwent LAAC.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study patients with previous major bleeding or a bleeding predisposition scheduled for transcatheter LAAC were included. The frequency and type of previous bleeding events and prevalence of bleeding and ischaemic stroke during follow-up were evaluated.

Results

A total of 73 patients (58% male, age 72.1 ± 7.2 years; CHA₂DS₂-VASc 4.5 [3.0–5.0]; HAS-BLED 4.0 [3.0–4.0]; 46% paroxysmal AF) were included. Previous bleeding occurred from intracranial (n = 50, 69%), gastro-intestinal (n = 13, 18%) or multiple (n = 16, 22%) foci. After OAC discontinuation due to bleeding, 19% suffered subsequent stroke. LAAC was successful in 96% of patients. During a median of almost 3 years’ follow-up recurrent major bleeding occurred in 4 patients (5.5%) despite OAC discontinuation in 93.2%. A total of 6 ischaemic strokes were observed, resulting in an annualised stroke rate of 2.9% compared to a calculated expected stroke rate of 6.7%.

Conclusions

Percutaneous LAAC may provide an alternative strategy to long-term OAC therapy in AF patients with a high bleeding risk. During follow-up, both ischaemic stroke and recurrent bleeding rates were lower than expected based on the CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED scores respectively.

Left atrial appendage patency and device-related thrombus after percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: a computed tomography study

Aims

Transoesophageal echocardiography studies have reported frequent peri-device leaks and device-related thrombi (DRT) after percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion. We assessed the prevalence, characteristics and correlates of leaks and DRT on cardiac computed tomography (CT) after LAA occlusion.

Methods and results

Consecutive patients underwent cardiac CT before LAA occlusion to assess left atrial (LA) volume, LAA shape, and landing zone diameter. Follow-up CT was performed after >3 months to assess device implantation criteria, device leaks and DRT. CT findings were related to patient and device characteristics, as well as to outcome during follow-up. One-hundred and seventeen patients (age 74 ± 9, 37% women, CHA2DS2VASc 4.4 ± 1.3, and HASBLED 3.5 ± 1.0) were implanted with Amplatzer cardiac plug (ACP)/Amulet (71%) or Watchman (29%). LAA patency was detected in 44% on arterial phase CT images and 69% on venous phase images. The most common leak location was postero-inferior. LAA patency related to LA dilatation, left ventricular ejection fraction impairment, non-chicken wing LAA shape, large landing zone diameter, incomplete device lobe thrombosis, and disc/lobe misalignment in patients with ACP/Amulet. DRT were detected in 19 (16%), most being laminated and of antero-superior location. DRT did not relate to clinical or imaging characteristics nor to implantation criteria, but to total thrombosis of device lobe. Over a mean 13 months follow-up, stroke/transient ischaemic attack occurred in eight patients, unrelated to DRT or LAA patency.

Conclusion

LAA patency on CT is common after LAA occlusion, particularly on venous phase images. Leaks relate to LA/LAA size at baseline, and device malposition and incomplete thrombosis at follow-up. DRT is also quite common but poorly predicted by patient and device-related factors.

Antithrombotic Therapy and Device-Related Thrombosis Following Endovascular Left Atrial Appendage Closure

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to review the evidence on the use of antithrombotic therapy and risk of device-related thrombosis after left atrial appendage closure.

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is increasingly performed for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, especially those who cannot tolerate or are ineligible for oral anticoagulation.

METHODS

After device implantation for LAAC, different antithrombotic regimens with varying duration of therapy are currently used. Such selection depends on patients' risk for bleeding and physicians' choice.

RESULTS

Device-related thrombosis remains an Achilles' heel of LAAC, and the etiology remains incompletely understood. Dual-antiplatelet therapy, and direct oral anticoagulation may have similar safety and device-related thrombosis occurrence in real-world LAAC registries compared with warfarin and aspirin. Device imaging surveillance should be routinely performed to assess for device-related thrombosis, which if diagnosed should be treated aggressively, as it is associated with higher thromboembolic risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the uncertainties and therapeutic dilemma, the authors provide an in-depth discussion of the options and rationale for antithrombotic therapy post-LAAC.

Incidence, Prevention, and Management of Periprocedural Complications of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Major procedural complications related to left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are relatively infrequent but may be associated with major morbidity and mortality. LAAO operators should be knowledgeable about these potential complications. Prompt recognition and treatment are necessary to avoid rapid deterioration and dire consequences. With stringent guidelines on operator training, competency requirements, and procedural-technical refinements, LAAO can be performed safely with low complication rates. This article focuses on commonly used devices, as well as prevention, treatment, and management of complications of LAOO.

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: The Current Device Landscape and Future Perspectives

Since the first percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO), many studies have shown the safety and efficacy of this technique to prevent embolic strokes in nonvavular atrial fibrillation. The design, characteristics, and clinical data of the most frequently used devices for LAAO are reviewed, including the Amplatzer cardiac plug and Amulet (Abbott Vascular), the Watchman (Boston Scientific), and the LARIAT device (SentreHEART). Similarly, newer closer devices, such as Ultraseal (Cardia), LAmbre (Lifetech), and Coherex WaveCrest (Johnson & Johnson), are also discussed. Finally, new technologies still in the stage of preclinical study or in the initial clinical experience are also reviewed.

Anatomy and Physiologic Roles of the Left Atrial Appendage: Implications for Endocardial and Epicardial Device Closure

The left atrial appendage has been implicated as a major nidus for thrombus formation, particularly in atrial fibrillation. This discovery has prompted substantial interest in the development of left atrial appendage exclusion devices aimed at decreasing systemic thromboembolism risk. Its deceptively simple appearance belies the remarkable complexity that characterizes its anatomy and physiology. We highlight the key anatomic features and variations of the left atrial appendage as well as its relationships with surrounding structures. We also summarize crucial anatomic factors that should be taken into account by the interventional cardiologist when planning for or performing left atrial appendage exclusion procedures.

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for The Unmet Clinical Needs of Stroke Prevention in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Oral anticoagulation is the dominant strategy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, lifelong oral anticoagulation is associated with major issues including inappropriate dosing, nonadherence, and adverse effects. Therefore, efforts have been made to develop site-specific therapy aimed to occlude the left atrial appendage, the anatomical site accountable for more than 90% of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation-related ischemic strokes. This review focuses on the growing literature to put into perspective the risk-balance ratio of left atrial appendage occlusion.

Rationale and design for AMPLATZER Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder IDE randomized controlled trial (Amulet IDE Trial)

The Amulet IDE Trial is an ongoing, prospective, randomized, multi-national trial, designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the AMPLATZER Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder for stroke prevention in comparison to the WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: Non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients at high risk of stroke (CHADS2 score ≥2 or a CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥3) who are suitable candidates for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) will be fully informed and requested to participate in the trial. A total of 1878 patients at up to 150 sites worldwide will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio between the AMPLATZER Amulet device (investigational) and the Boston Scientific WATCHMAN device (control). Each patient will be followed for 5 years, with follow-up assessments at discharge, 45 days, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months and then annually. The trial has three primary endpoints: A composite of procedure-related complications, or all-cause death, or major bleeding through 12 months (safety); a composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism through 18 months (effectiveness); and effective device LAAO, defined as residual jet around the device ≤5 mm at the 45-day visit (mechanism of action). SUMMARY: The Amulet IDE Trial is the first randomized head-to-head LAAO device trial and will provide data for the AMPLATZER Amulet occluder in a population with a high risk of stroke and bleeding.

Left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke despite oral anticoagulation (resistant stroke). Results from the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug registry

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Despite the efficacy of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy, some patients continue to have a high residual risk and develop a stroke on OAC therapy (resistant stroke [RS]), and there is a lack of evidence on the management of these patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as secondary prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who have experienced a stroke/transient ischemic attack despite OAC treatment.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug multicenter registry on 1047 consecutive patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation undergoing LAAO. Patientes with previous stroke on OAC therapy as indication for LAAO were identified and compared with patients with other indications.

RESULTS

A total of 115 patients (11%) with RS were identified. The CHA₂DS₂-VASc and the HAS-BLED score were significantly higher in the RS group (respectively 5.5±1.5 vs 4.3±1.6; P <.001; 3.9±1.3 vs 3.1±1.2; P <.001). No significant differences were observed in periprocedural major safety events (7.8 vs 4.5%; P=.1). With a mean clinical follow-up of 16.2±12.2 months, the observed annual stroke/transient ischemic attack rate for the RS group was 2.6% (65% risk reduction) and the observed annual major bleeding rate was 0% (100% risk reduction).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with RS undergoing LAAO showed similar safety outcomes to patients without RS, with a significant reduction in stroke/transient ischemic attack and major bleeding events during follow-up. Adequately powered controlled trials are needed to further investigate the use of LAAO in RS patients.

Left atrial appendage occlusion in patients older than 85 years. Safety and efficacy in the EWOLUTION registry

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Elderly patients with atrial fibrillation are at greater risk of both cardioembolic events and major bleeding than younger patients. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) could be an attractive alternative for these patients, but there are limited data on outcomes with LAAO in patients ≥ 85 years old. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of LAAO in patients ≥ 85 years old.

METHODS

A total of 1025 patients included in the EWOLUTION registry who underwent LAAO were analyzed and 84 patients ≥ 85 years old were identified and compared with the younger cohort.

RESULTS

Patients ≥ 85 years old had higher estimated stroke and hemorrhagic risks than younger patients (CHA₂DS₂-VASc: 5.2±1.2 vs 4.4±1.6, P <.0001; HAS-BLED: 2.7±1.1 vs 2.3±1.2; P=.003; ≥ 85 years vs <85 years). Procedural success was high and similar in both groups (98.8% vs 98.5%; P=.99). There were no differences in 7-day device- or procedure-related adverse event rates (2.6% in ≥ 85 years vs 3.1% in <85 years; P=.80). Despite the higher baseline stroke risk, there was no difference at follow-up between the groups in the annualized stroke rate (0.8/100 patient-years in ≥ 85 years vs 1.3/100 patient-years in <85 years; P=.649).

CONCLUSIONS

LAAO in patients ≥ 85 years is safe and effective even though these patients are at high risk for embolic and hemorrhagic events. LAAO may be a reasonable alternative to oral anticoagulation in these patients.

Antithrombotic treatment for secondary prevention of stroke and other thromboembolic events in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack and non-valvular atrial fibrillation: A European Stroke Organisation guideline

Patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and non-valvular atrial fibrillation have a high risk of recurrent stroke and other vascular events. The aim of this guideline is to provide recommendations on antithrombotic medication for secondary prevention of stroke and other vascular outcomes in these patients. The working group identified questions and outcomes, graded evidence, and developed recommendations according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach and the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) standard operating procedure for guidelines. The guideline was reviewed and approved by the ESO guideline board and the ESO executive committee. In patients with atrial fibrillation and previous stroke or transient ischemic attack, oral anticoagulants reduce the risk of recurrence over antiplatelets or no antithrombotic treatment. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are preferred over vitamin K antagonists because they have a lower risk of major bleeding and death. Recommendations are weak regarding timing of treatment, (re-)starting oral anticoagulants in patients with previous intracerebral haemorrhage, and treatment in specific patient subgroups of those of older age, with cognitive impairment, renal failure or small vessel disease, because of a lack of strong evidence. In conclusion, for patients with atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are the preferred treatment for secondary prevention of recurrent stroke or thromboembolism. Further research is required to determine the best timing for initiating oral anticoagulants after an acute ischemic stroke, whether or not oral anticoagulants should be (re)started in patients with a history of intracerebral haemorrhage, and the best secondary preventive treatment in specific subgroups.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation and left appendage thrombus: feasibility, safety and clinical efficacy

AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of percutaneous closure for prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study included consecutive patients with AF and LAA thrombus who underwent transcatheter occlusion in eight high-volume centres. Clinical and transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) follow-up was carried out as per each centre's protocol. Twenty-eight patients were included. The location of the LAA thrombus was distal in 100% of cases. Technical and procedural success was achieved in all patients. A cerebral protection device was used in six cases. There were no periprocedural adverse events. Follow-up was complete in all patients (total 32 patient-years). No death or thromboembolic events were reported. There was one major bleeding during follow-up. Among the 23 patients undergoing TEE, device thrombosis was present in one patient. No significant peri-device leaks were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicentre study, percutaneous closure in selected patients with distal LAA thrombus appears to be feasible and safe, and is associated with high procedural success and a favourable outcome for the prevention of AF-related thromboembolism. Special implant techniques avoiding mechanical mobilisation of the thrombotic mass and the liberal use of cerebral embolic protection devices are recommended.

Real-world survival data of device-related thrombus following left atrial appendage closure: 4-year experience from a single center

This study aimed to estimate the incidence and risk factors of device-related thrombus (DRT) following percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in real-world practices. Between February 2012 and December 2016, 319 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation underwent percutaneous LAAC using WATCHMAN, WATCHMAN Flx, Amplatzer cardiac plug, and Amulet devices. All patients underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) at a minimum of three time points; periprocedurally, at 45 days, and at 6 months. Other clinical parameters were also evaluated, and a comparison between patients with DRT and those not suffering from DRT was done. The percutaneous LAAC was successfully performed in 97.8% of the patients. DRT was detected in 14 (4.49%) patients; of the 14 patients, DRT was detected in 3 patients at acute phase, 8 patients at subacute phase, 2 patients at late phase and 1 patient at very late phase. Most of the DRT originated from the central screw of device. In 6 out of 14 patients, DRT was successfully resolved by oral anticoagulation. Higher HAS-BLED score (4.1 ± 1.2 vs. 3.5 ± 1.1, p = 0.042) was more frequent in patients with DRT. Multivariable analysis showed that residual peri-device leak may result in a predisposition to DRT (p = 0.023). The incidence of DRT after percutaneous LAAC was acceptable, as a part of the DRT was resolved with oral anticoagulation. Residual peri-device leak was associated with DRT. Optimal implantation without peri-device gap, individual antithrombotic regimens, and careful monitoring with TEE follow-up could be conducive to the prevention of DRT.

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in High Bleeding Risk Patients

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in high bleeding risk patients suffering atrial fibrillation (AF) and to analyze the different antithrombotic therapies following the intervention.

Background. Methods

This monocentric study included 68 patients with nonvalvular AF with an absolute contraindication to OAT or at high bleeding risk. Follow-up was done with a clinical visit at 3-6-12 months.

Results

Successful LAAO was achieved in 67/68 patients. At discharge, 32/68 patients were on dual antiplatelet therapy (APT), 34/68 were without any antithrombotic therapy or with a single antiplatelet drug, and 2/68 were on anticoagulant therapy. At three-month follow-up visit, 73.6% of the patients did not receive dual APT, of whom 14.7% had no thrombotic therapy and 58.9% were on single antiplatelet therapy. During a follow-up of 1.4 ± 0.9 years, 3/62 patients had late adverse effects (2 device-related thrombus without clinical consequences and 1 extracranial bleeding). The device-related thrombosis was not related to the antithrombotic therapy.

Conclusions

LAAO is feasible and safe and prevents stroke in patients with AF with contraindication to oral anticoagulant therapy. After LAAO, single antiplatelet therapy seems to be a safe alternative to dual antiplatelet therapy, especially in patients at high bleeding risk. No benefit has been observed with dual APT.

Comparison of three left atrial appendage occlusion devices for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a single-centre seven-year experience with WATCHMAN, AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug/Amulet, LAmbre: Comparison of three LAAO devices for stroke prevention

AIMS

We aimed to compare long-term "real-world" outcomes of three left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices for stroke prevention in a Chinese population with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients who underwent LAAO from June 2009 to October 2016 at a university-affiliated hospital were retrospectively analysed. In-hospital and major adverse events (MAE) including mortality, stroke and major bleeding rates were compared by LAAO device. One hundred and sixty-one (161) patients (mean age 71.4±8.2 years; 67.7% male) with mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of 4.1±1.6 and HAS-BLED score of 2.9±1.1 underwent 162 LAAO procedures, of which 47.5% (n=77), 41.4% (n=67) and 11.1% (n=18) were AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug (ACP)/Amulet, WATCHMAN and LAmbre, respectively. The procedural success rate was 97.5% (158/162). The in-hospital adverse event rate was 7.4% (12/162) and comparable among devices (p=NS). Mean follow-up duration was 28.3±24.4 months (373 patient-years). There were no significant differences in long-term MAE rates among devices (p=NS). Observed annual ischaemic stroke (1.1% vs. 5.1%, p<0.001) and major bleeding rates (2.7% vs. 4.5%, p=NS) were lower compared with the predicted rates, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The WATCHMAN, ACP/Amulet and LAmbre LAAO devices demonstrated similar long-term safety and efficacy in prevention of ischaemic stroke and major bleeding in patients with NVAF.

Dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: single center experience with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative to anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients at high bleeding risk. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is generally recommended in the months following the procedure to prevent thrombotic complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DAPT after LAAO in a single-centre population of high bleeding risk patients.

METHODS

All patients who received DAPT after LAAO using the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug at Jessa Hospital (Hasselt, BE) between February 2011 and October 2016 were included. Patient characteristics, procedural outcome and clinical events (bleeding, stroke and adverse events) were prospectively followed. Changes in antithrombotic and/or anticoagulant regimens were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients (77 ± 7 years, 51% male, CHA₂DS₂-VASc 5(3-6), Hypertension, Abnormal Renal/Liver Function, Stroke, Bleeding History or Predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/Alcohol Concomitantly (HAS-BLED) 3(3-4)) were included. An initial strategy of one month DAPT (n = 2) was changed to six months DAPT (n = 37) after one thrombotic complication (device thrombosis) at 4.5 months. Post-procedural DAPT duration was 6.1 ± 3.7 months, after which aspirin monotherapy (62%), no antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy (15%) or a tailored antithrombotic regimen was maintained. At mean follow-up of 21 ± 13 months, seven patients had died (18%), no strokes had occurred (0%) and nine bleedings of which four were major (10%). All major bleedings occurred within the first six months after the procedure during DAPT.

CONCLUSION

Antithrombotic therapy after percutaneous LAAO is needed to prevent thrombotic complications, yet these impose bleeding complications in this high-risk population. Further efforts are needed to define the optimal duration of DAPT, aimed at reducing bleeding complications while maintaining a low thrombosis rate.

Current Endocardial Approaches for Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Collapse

Left atrial appendage occlusion using LAmbre Amulet and Watchman in atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has been suggested as an alternative to anticoagulation in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). The present study aimed to compare a LAmbre LAA occluder system [Lifetech Scientific (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd., Shenzhen, China] with the most investigated Amulet (St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) and Watchman (Boston Scientific, Plymouth, MN, USA) devices in terms of peri-procedural and short-term outcomes.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study.

RESULTS

Overall, 140 patients (50 female, mean age 76.2±8.4 years) were consecutively enrolled. Mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.8±1.5, and mean HAS-BLED score was 3.9±1.1. Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the three groups (LAmbre, n=30; Amulet, n=74; Watchman, n=36); the LAmbre group had significantly more patients with complicated LAA morphology (p=0.006). The implant success rate was 100% in LAmbre, 99% in Amulet, and 100% in Watchman group (p=0.638). The number of device repositions was not significantly different between groups (0.7±1.1 in LAmbre, 1.0±2.0 in Amulet, and 1.4±1.8 in Watchman group, p=0.345). Fluoroscopic and procedural times were similar between groups. Major peri-procedural adverse events did not differ between groups (0% vs. 0% vs. 2.8%, p=0.233). Six months' follow-up showed good device stability and patients' clinical condition in all groups.

CONCLUSION

LAmbre, Amulet, and Watchman exhibit remarkable implant success rate, low risk of peri-procedural adverse events, and good clinical outcomes.

Peridevice Leak After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Impact

BACKGROUND

Limited studies reported the rate and clinical impact of peridevice leaks (PDL) after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC).

METHODS

All consecutive patients with a nonvalvular atrial fibrillation admitted for LAAC between November 2011 and October 2016 were prospectively enrolled. The follow-up included clinical, transesophageal echocardiography, and/or cardiac computed tomography angiogram (CCTA). PDL was defined by the presence of contrast within the left atrial appendage on CCTA, and Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) included stroke, device-related thrombosis, and cardiovascular death.

RESULTS

Overall, 77 patients (mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc score = 4.4 ± 1.5 and mean HAS-BLED = 3.4 ± 1.1) were implanted using Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (n = 24), Amulet (n = 37), or Watchman devices (n = 16). Indications were stroke recurrence despite adequate oral anticoagulation (OAC, n = 6) or contraindication to long-term OAC (n = 71). From 3-month to 12-month CCTA follow-up, the PDL rate decreased from 68.5% to 56.7% (P = 0.02), without any difference between the various devices. Patients with PDL were more often in permanent atrial fibrillation, and had a larger landing zone diameter, a lower ratio of device compression, and a more frequent off-axis position of the device. A device compression ratio < 10% was the only parameter associated with PDL occurrence. During follow-up (median 236 days) the MACE rate was 9.1%, with no statistically significant difference between patients with vs without PDL (12% vs 4.3%, P = 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

The PDL rate detected by CCTA after LAAC was high, especially in cases with a low device compression ratio (< 10%), but decreased over time. The incidence of MACE was quantitatively greater with PDL, but the difference was not statistically significant. Larger studies are needed to determine the clinical importance of PDL.

[Left atrial appendage occlusion in elderly]

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative option to oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. According to French regulations, this procedure is currently reserved for patients with formal contraindications to VKA and direct thrombin inhibitors. LAAO procedures reduce ischemic and stroke risks compared to no treatment and also reduce bleeding events compared to VKA therapy in eligible patients. The peri-procedural complications risk has been reported to be limited in the different series published so far. Although elderly patients (>75 years) have either higher ischemic and bleeding risk than younger subjects, they hardly benefit from optimal anticoagulation. Thus, these subjects might greatly benefit from LAAO. Published studies reported excellent feasibility and efficiency of LAAO procedure in elderly patients. Yet there is a trend towards a higher incidence of peri-procedural complications (including tamponade), long-term safety is excellent and comparable to what is observed in patients<75 years. Therefore, interventional percutaneous LAAO is an attractive strategy in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation that should be incorporated in a multidisciplinary management.

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Review and Critical Appraisal

The authors review the current status of percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation with the goal to prevent ischemic stroke and systemic embolism and to reduce oral anticoagulation associated bleeding. While we cover the historical and also surgical background, and all tested devices, the main focus rests on the single currently U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved LAA occluder, the WATCHMAN device, and its approval process. The authors also give a critical appraisal beyond the review of mere facts, trying to put the current data into perspective.

Intracardiac echography for left atrial appendage closure: A step-by-step tutorial

OBJECTIVES

We sought to provide a practical educational tool for the utilization of intracardiac echography (ICE) in the left atrium for the percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA).

BACKGROUND

Although transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the gold-standard imaging technique for LAA closure, ICE is stepping in to support noncoronary cardiology interventions by improving workflow and case turnover and may be more adequate for frail patients with significant and multiple comorbidities.

METHODS

This article discusses the utility of ICE for LAA closure, its advantages compared to TEE, contraindications to TEE use and offers an extensive illustration of the main steps of the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ICE in the left atrium allows a feasible guidance of all steps of the percutaneous closure of LAA.

Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion With the Amulet Device

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is increasingly used for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation who are considered unsuitable for a lifelong oral anticoagulant regimen. Recently, a single-centre study reported device-related thrombus formation in 16.7% of patients treated with the second-generation Amulet device (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA), presenting a potential major safety concern. As "real-world" data on device-related thrombus formation following LAAO with the Amulet occluder are scarce, we aimed to evaluate this outcome in a retrospective registry.

METHODS

Clinical and tranosesophageal echocardiography data after LAAO with the Amulet in consecutive patients from three centres were collated.

RESULTS

Among 38 patients (mean age 75.8 years), mean (standard deviation) CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.4 (1.2) and 3.4 (0.9), respectively. All patients underwent successful device placement without procedure-related adverse events. The antithrombotic regimen at discharge consisted of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in 27 patients (71.1%), single antiplatelet therapy in 10 patients (26.3%), and no antithrombotic therapy in one patient (2.6%). Device-related thrombus was observed in one patient (2.6%) despite DAPT regimen. The outcome of this patient was uncomplicated after adjustment of oral anticoagulant therapy. No patients presented with a thromboembolic event following LAAO during a mean (standard deviation) follow-up of 15 (5) months.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, device-related thrombus formation with the second-generation Amulet device was rare and occurred at a rate similar to that of the previous device. Importantly, no patient experienced a device-related thromboembolic event during follow-up. Larger real-life studies are required to confirm the safety profile of this increasingly used device.

Day-case percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion-Safety and efficacy

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion performed as a day case procedure.

BACKGROUND

LAA occlusion has been shown to be safe and effective for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. It has not been shown if the procedure can safely be performed on a day-case basis.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was made of 117 LAA occlusion procedures in a single large teaching hospital in the UK. Procedural success, procedural complications, length of stay, and readmission data were examined.

RESULTS

Successful deployment of a device was possible in all but one patient (whose appendage was too large). Major in-hospital complications occurred in 1.7% of patients (both femoral vascular). Same-day discharge was made in 66% of patients overall. Since January 2016, only 3 of 59 patients (5%) have remained in hospital overnight following LAAO. Echocardiography 2-4 hr postprocedure was undertaken prior to discharge. One patient was readmitted within 7 days but this readmission would not have been prevented by overnight stay.

CONCLUSIONS

LAA occlusion can be safely performed as a day case procedure with acceptable complication rates and no increment of complications related to the lack of routine overnight stay.

The cessation of oral anticoagulation following left atrial appendage surgery

Atrial fibrillation is associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke, and oral anticoagulation is the mainstay of preventative treatment. Scenarios arise where the risks of treatment with oral anticoagulation may outweigh the benefits, most commonly when there is an elevated risk of bleeding. Studies of percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage have strongly implicated this structure in the etiology of stroke in atrial fibrillation, and provide some rationale for the discontinuation of oral anticoagulation following percutaneous closure device implantation. A common clinical concern is the safety of cessation of oral anticoagulation after surgical closure of the left atrial appendage in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation. Here, we review the evidence guiding this management decision and draw comparison with data on percutaneous closure.