Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel (NSABP) protocol B-18

Disease-free and overall survival after pathologic complete disease remission of cytologically proven inflammatory breast carcinoma axillary lymph node metastases after primary systemic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Breast carcinoma axillary lymph node (ALN) pathologic complete response (pCR) after primary chemotherapy is associated with significantly higher recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. The purpose of the current study was to determine long-term outcome in patients achieving a pCR of cytologically proven inflammatory breast carcinoma ALN metastases after primary chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with cytologically documented ALN metastases from inflammatory breast carcinoma were treated in three prospective primary chemotherapy trials. After surgery, patients were subdivided into those patients with and those patients without residual ALN carcinoma. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of 175 patients treated, 61 had cytologically confirmed ALN metastases. Fourteen patients (23%) achieved a pCR of the ALNs after primary chemotherapy. The 5-year OS and RFS rates were found to be improved in those patients achieving a pCR of the ALNs (82.5% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 62.8-100%] and 78.6% [95%CI, 59.8-100%], respectively, vs. 37.1% [95%CI, 25.4-54.2%] and 25.4% [95%CI, 15.5-41.5%], respectively) (P = 0.01 [for OS] and P = 0.001 [for RFS]). Combination anthracycline and taxane-based primary chemotherapy resulted in significantly more patients achieving an ALN pCR (45% vs. 16%; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

pCR of ALN metastases is associated with an excellent prognosis in patients with inflammatory breast carcinoma. The rates of ALN pCR are nearly 50% in patients with inflammatory breast carcinoma who are treated with anthracyclines and weekly paclitaxel before surgery. However, those patients with residual ALN disease at the time of surgery greatly require the introduction of novel therapeutic strategies.

Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after primary chemotherapy in relation to hormone receptor status and other factors

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether hormonal receptor (HR) status can influence the prognostic significance of pathologic complete response (pCR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 1,731 patients with stage I to III noninflammatory breast cancer treated between 1988 and 2005 with primary chemotherapy (PC). Ninety-one percent of patients received anthracycline-based PC, and 66% received additional taxane therapy. pCR was defined as no evidence of invasive tumor in the breast and axillary lymph nodes.

RESULTS

Median age was 49 years (range, 19 to 83 years). Sixty-seven percent of patients (n = 1,163) had HR-positive tumors. A pCR was observed in 225 (13%) of 1,731 patients; pCR rates were 24% in HR-negative tumors and 8% in HR-positive tumors (P < .001). A significant survival benefit for patients who achieved pCR compared with no pCR was observed regardless of HR status. In the HR-positive group, 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 96.4% v 84.5% (P = .04) and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 91.1% v 65.3% (P < .0001) for patients with and without pCR, respectively. For the HR-negative group, 5-year OS rates were 83.9% v 67.4% (P = .003) and 5-year PFS rates were 83.4% v 50.0% (P < .0001) for patients with and without pCR, respectively. After adjustment for adjuvant hormonal treatment, HR status, clinical stage, and nuclear grade, patients who achieved a pCR had 0.36 times the risk of death.

CONCLUSION

pCR is associated with better outcome regardless of HR status in breast cancer patients who receive PC.

Tratamiento neoadyuvante del cáncer de mama operable

Preoperative or neoadjuvant systemic treatment refers to either the first postdiagnosis systemic treatment that a patient receives or indicates that additional subsequent therapy is intended. Randomized controlled clinical trials have shown that preoperative systemic treatment offers the same disease free survival and overall survival benefits as does adjuvant systemic treatment. Neoadjuvant therapy has been found to increase the breast-conserving surgery rate. This therapy also allows to evaluate the primary tumor response to chemotherapy. Additionally, on the basis of the biologic characteristics of a tumor and differences in the response to systemic treatment, primary systemic treatment should be regarded as a tool that can be used to individualize systemic treatment for patients with breast cancer. However, some issues remain to be resolved, such as the markers that should be assessed before this therapy, as well as the optimal surgical and radiotherapy treatment.

Outcome after pathologic complete eradication of cytologically proven breast cancer axillary node metastases following primary chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Pathologic complete remission (pCR) of primary breast tumors after primary chemotherapy (PCT) is associated with higher relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. The purpose of this study was to determine long-term outcome in patients achieving pCR of cytologically proven axillary lymph node (ALN) metastases.

METHODS

Patients with cytologically documented ALN metastases were treated in five prospective PCT trials. After surgery, patients were subdivided into those with and without residual ALN carcinoma. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of 925 patients treated, 403 patients had cytologically confirmed ALN metastases. Eighty-nine patients (22%) achieved ALN pCR after PCT. Compared with the group without ALN pCR, 5-year OS and RFS were improved in patients achieving ALN pCR (93% [95% CI, 87.5 to 98.5] and 87% [95% CI, 79.7 to 94.3] v 72% [95% CI, 66.5 to 77.5] and 60% [95% CI, 54.1 to 65.9], respectively; P < .0001). Residual primary tumor did not affect outcome of those with ALN pCR. Combination anthracycline/taxane-based PCT resulted in significantly more ALN pCRs, although outcome after ALN pCR was not improved by taxanes. We constructed a nomogram demonstrating that patients who do not benefit from neoadjuvant anthracyclines are unlikely to benefit from subsequent taxanes.

CONCLUSION

ALN pCR is associated with an excellent prognosis, even with a residual primary tumor, pointing to biologic differences between primary and metastatic cells. ALN pCR represents an early surrogate marker of long-term outcome. Response to initial PCT has important potential as a guide to subsequent therapy.

Apoptosis induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

AIM

To evaluate the relationship between apoptosis induced by chemotherapy and clinical response in breast cancer.

METHODS

Apoptosis index (AI), mutant p53 and Bcl-2 protein expression were evaluated in 44 breast tumour samples from patients submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Objective response (OR) to primary chemotherapy was observed in 37 patients (84%) and no response (NR) in seven. AI was measured by the rate of apoptotic cells identified using morphological criteria. p53 and Bcl-2 protein expression were evaluated using an immunoperoxidase staining technique.

RESULTS

The median AI change observed between pre-chemotherapy AI and post-chemotherapy AI was 0.84 in the OR group and 0.01 in the NR group, (rho = 0.4; p = 0.006). There was no change in Bcl-2 protein expression following chemotherapy. In the OR group, p53 protein expression was positive in 41.6% of patients before and in 22.2% after chemotherapy (difference = 16.6%; p = 0.03). No change was detected in the NR group.

CONCLUSION

A positive correlation was found between the increase in AI and clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

A case of mucinous carcinoma of the breast that demonstrated a good pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy despite a poor clinical response

A 30-year-old woman presented with a right breast tumor. Mucinous carcinoma was diagnosed by core needle biopsy (T2: 5 cm N1 M0). Despite receiving a neoadjuvant anthracycline and taxane regimen, the patient demonstrated no clinical response (NC). Based on the patient's strong preference, we performed breast-conserving surgery. On histological examination, we observed widespread mucus and a few viable malignant cells, a Grade 2 therapeutic response. Neither optimal management procedures nor guidelines for chemotherapy for primary mucinous carcinoma of the breast have been established. It is a reasonable assumption, however, that discordance between the clinical response and therapeutic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may occur in cases of mucinous carcinoma.

Histopathologic and Metabolic Criteria for Assessment of Treatment Response in Breast Cancer

Increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer necessitates methods for evaluation of therapeutic response. Histopathology provides accurate assessment of treatment efficacy but only approximately 20% of breast cancer patients achieve complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, methods that predict therapeutic effectiveness could help individualize treatment and avoid ineffective chemotherapies. Metabolic imaging using positron emission tomography (PET) and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) seems to provide early response assessment in vivo. Change in FDG uptake after chemotherapy initiation correlates with histopathologic response after completion. PET response assessment criteria and imaging protocols need to be developed and validated. This article compares complementary approaches for assessment of treatment response, namely histologic features of the tumor on the microscopic level versus in vivo metabolic changes on a macroscopic level.

Predictive Value of Biologic Parameters for Primary Chemotherapy in Operable Breast Cancer

Primary chemotherapy represents an ideal model to evaluate the relationships between treatments and the prognostic and predictive parameters provided by the new technologies. First- and second-generation trials have shown that primary chemotherapy significantly improves the rate of breast conservation without increasing the risk of ipsilateral recurrence and while assuring survival rates comparable with those achieved with postoperative chemotherapy. Moreover, patients who exhibited a pathologic complete response (pCR) showed better progression-free survival and overall survival. The third-generation trials were aimed at improving the percentage of pCR, identifying and validating gene and protein biomarkers of chemotherapy sensitivity, and better defining the individual risk of relapse. Several parameters, such as index of proliferation and apoptosis, expression of proteins (eg, p53 and Bcl-2), and hormone receptor and epidermal growth factor family receptors, have been related to response to primary chemotherapy. Negative hormone receptors and greater proliferative activity seem to be the only parameters more consistently associated with greater chemotherapy sensitivity. However, the strength of this association is not sufficient to differentiate patients at different degrees of risk and does not allow for an individualized therapeutic choice. Newer technologies offer the possibility of evaluating thousands of genes and identifying clusters of gene expression associated with significantly different risks of relapse and patterns of sensitivity/resistance to specific drugs. The primary chemotherapy model is the ideal clinical setting in which to validate the relationship between tumor molecular profiling and treatment outcomes and to design tailored therapies based on observed effects on individual tumors.

How do we measure a residual tumor size in histopathology (the gold standard) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

Accurate reporting of the residual tumor size by pathologists after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an important component of a breast cancer. Recent literature reported comparisons regarding the accuracy of clinical and radiological residual tumor size findings using the histopathology as a "gold standard". However, the histopathological methods of measuring the residual tumor size are not standardized. Most pathologists use the tumor size measured by the gross examination. We collected 32 patient samples and compared the residual tumor size by gross and microscopic pathologic examinations. Using microscopic tumor size as the gold standard, our study showed gross tumor size is overestimated in 25%, underestimated in 56% and correlated to the final microscopic tumor size in 19% of the cases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Determining accurate residual tumor size to estimate pathologic response to chemotherapy is essential. We attempted to provide guidelines for pathology reporting post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast cancers.

Pathological complete response rates comparing 3 versus 6 cycles of epidoxorubicin and docetaxel in the neoadjuvant setting of patients with stage II and III breast cancer

We conducted a prospective randomized study to compare the results of 3 cycles of epidoxorubicin/docetaxel to 6 cycles of epidoxorubicin/docetaxel prior to surgery in breast cancer patients with clinical stages II and III. Forty-five patients eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive either 3 (group 1) or 6 (group 2) cycles of epidoxorubicin/docetaxel prior to surgery. Chemotherapy consisted of epidoxorubicin 75 mg/m and docetaxel 75 mg/m on day 1 in 3-week cycles. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate; secondary endpoints were the rates of breast-conserving surgery and the axillary lymph node status in both groups. A pCR occurred in 10% (two of 20) in Group 1 and in 36% (nine of 25) in Group 2, which was statistically significant (p=0.045). Breast-conserving surgery could be performed in 70% (14 of 20) in Group 1 and in 76% (19 of 25) in Group 2 (p=0.065). Axillary lymph node status was negative in 45% (nine of 20) in Group 1 and 52% (13 of 25) in Group 2 (p=0.86). We conclude that 6 cycles of pre-operative epidoxorubicin/docetaxel versus 3 cycles of pre-operative epidoxorubicin/docetaxel significantly increases the pCR rates for breast cancer patients.

Neoadjuvant docetaxel followed by adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in patients with stage III breast cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate clinical and pathologic response to neoadjuvant docetaxel therapy in patients with stage III breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-five patients were planned to receive four cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, followed by surgery, four cycles of doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (AC) every 3 weeks, radiation therapy (RT), and tamoxifen when indicated.

RESULTS

After four cycles of neoadjuvant docetaxel, the clinical response rate within the breast was 59% (95% CI 42% to 73%) and overall (breast and axilla) was 49% (95% CI 38% to 72%) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. At the time of surgery, 10% (n=4) of patients had a pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast, 27% (n=11) had a pCR within the axillary lymph nodes, and 7% (n=3) had a pCR in the breast and axilla (95% CI 2% to 21%). An additional 5% (n=2) had minimal residual invasive tumor (<5 mm). The 5-year overall survival rate was 80%. The percentage of patients with grade 3/4 neutropenia was similar during docetaxel (93%) and AC (86%), while a greater percentage of patients had febrile neutropenia during docetaxel treatment (27%) compared with AC treatment (7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant docetaxel followed by surgery, adjuvant AC, hormonal therapy where indicated, and RT is an active regimen for patients with stage III breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant vinorelbine/epirubicin (VE) versus standard adriamycin/cyclophosphamide (AC) in operable breast cancer: analysis of response and tolerability in a randomised phase III trial (TOPIC 2)

BACKGROUND

Vinorelbine is active and well tolerated against advanced breast cancer but there are no published efficacy studies in early breast cancer. We have therefore carried out a randomised phase III neoadjuvant trial in operable breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with > or =3 cm operable breast carcinoma were randomised to receive either vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and epirubicin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1, 3 weekly for six cycles (VE) or doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1, 3 weekly for six cycles (AC), prior to standard local therapy, and adjuvant endocrine therapy as appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 451 patients were randomised. Results for AC and VE, respectively, were: overall clinical response 73% and 74%, complete clinical remission 20% and 24%, pathological complete remission 12% and 12%, mastectomy rate 52% and 55%. None of these differences were significant. Dose reduction was required in 8% for AC and 20% for VE (P <0.001) (GSCF support not used). Significantly more grade 3/4 toxicity for nausea, vomiting and alopecia (despite scalp cooling) was seen for AC compared with VE but significantly less grade 3/4 thrombophlebitis and neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant VE is as effective as AC in early breast cancer and was better tolerated except for thrombophlebitis and neuropathy.

Final Results of a Phase II Trial of Preoperative TAC (Docetaxel/Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide) in Stage III Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The use of preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer has been demonstrated to result in similar disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast after preoperative chemotherapy has been shown to correlate with survival. The objective of this study was to determine the pCR rate in patients with stage III breast cancer treated with 4 cycles of TAC (docetaxel 75 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) on day 1 before surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From November 1998 through August 2001, we treated 40 patients (mean age, 47 years) with stage III breast cancer with TAC administered every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.

RESULTS

We now report follow-up at 24 months. Responses were seen in 83% of patients, with 25% experiencing a clinical complete response, of which 4 patients (10%) had pCRs. At a follow-up of 2 years, data on DFS and OS are available on 37 patients: 12 patients (38%) had disease progression, and 7 patients (21%) had died. Despite the use of prophylactic ciprofloxacin, some degree of myelosuppression was seen in all patients, with 24 patients (63%) experiencing grade 3/4 neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Based on the pCR rate seen in this trial, docetaxel given concomitantly with AC (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) for 4 cycles does not appear to be superior to 4 cycles of AC as preoperative treatment for stage III breast cancer. Based on other trials, longer durations of therapy and/or sequencing of AC and docetaxel may result in a higher pCR rate.

Pathological and Clinical Response of a Primary Chemotherapy Regimen Combining Vinorelbine, Epirubicin, and Paclitaxel as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients with Operable Breast Cancer

This phase II study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of a primary chemotherapy regimen combining vinorelbine, epirubicin, and paclitaxel (VEP protocol) in women with stage II/III operable breast cancer. Patients (n = 50) were treated with six cycles of VEP according to the following schedule: vinorelbine (Navelbine); Pierre Fabre, Boulogne, France; http://www.pierre-fabre.com) 20 mg/m2, epirubicin (Farmorubicin; Pharmacia, New York, NY; http://www.pnu.com) 35 mg/m2 given on days 1 and 8, paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY; http://www.bmsoncology.com) 175 mg/m2 given on day 9, and G-CSF 5 mg/kg/day given on days 10-20 of a 21-day cycle, followed by surgery and radiotherapy. After six cycles of VEP, the pathological response rate (pCR) in breast was confirmed in six patients (12%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3-21)) using Chevallier's classification and in nine patients (18%; 95% CI: 7.4-28.6) using Sataloff's classification. The clinical response rate was 42% (95% CI: 28.3-55.7), including 26% complete responses. Breast conservation was achieved in 68% of patients. After a median follow-up of 48 months (range, 34-62 months), 16 relapses were observed. The overall and disease-free survivals at 5 years were 54.1% (95% CI: 40.3-67.9) and 38% (95% CI: 24.1-51.9), respectively. The principal toxicities of VEP were grade 3/4 neutropenia observed in 30% of patients and grade 3 anemia observed in 12% of patients. There was no case of severe cardiac toxicity, thrombocytopenia, or any other serious adverse events. In conclusion, whereas this regimen was relatively well tolerated, it appears inferior to other regimens and its use is not recommended.

[Morphological response to therapy of breast carcinoma]

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been extended to earlier stages of breast carcinoma in order to increase the rate of breast conservation by downstaging. Tumour regression can be observed in up to 80% of the cases and the chemosensitivity of the individual tumour can be studied in vivo. Moreover therapy induced regression has been established as an independent prognostic parameter. Characteristic effects of chemotherapy include reduction in cell number, fibrosis, vacuolization of cytoplasm and increased nuclear pleomorphism. Grading, typing and immunohistochemical properties of the carcinomas remain unchanged in the majority of cases. Predictive for the chemosensitivity of tumours are a high nuclear grade, overexpression of Her-2-neu, lack of estrogen receptor expression and lymph node metastases.

Oestrogen receptor status, pathological complete response and prognosis in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer

The aim of this study was to ascertain if oestrogen receptor (ER) status predicts for pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer, and the effects of pCR on survival. Using a single-institution database, 435 patients were identified, who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer and were eligible for the analysis. Patients whose tumours were ER negative were more likely to achieve a pCR than patients who were ER positive (21.6 vs 8.1%, P<0.001). Owing to a strong correlation between ER status and grade, these variables were not shown to be independent predictors of pCR. Overall survival (OS) was better in those patients who achieved a pCR compared to those who did not (5-year OS 91 vs 73%; P=0.02). This was still the case when only patients with ER-negative tumours were examined (5-year OS 90 vs 52%, P=0.005), but not in the subset of patients with ER-positive tumours (5-year OS 93 vs 79%; P=0.3). Therefore, patients with ER-negative tumours were found to be more likely to achieve a pCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy than those with ER-positive tumours, and pathological response did not have prognostic significance in patients with ER-positive tumours.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer was originally used in locally advanced inoperable disease in order to achieve surgical resection. It was then extended to operable breast cancer with a view to downstaging tumours to facilitate breast-conserving surgery. Increasingly, it is being considered as a treatment for earlier-stage disease.

METHODS

A Medline literature search was performed to identify articles relating to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer published in the English language between 1960 and 2004. Secondary references were obtained from key articles. Search words included 'neoadjuvant chemotherapy', 'breast cancer', 'tumour biology', 'tumour markers' and 'sentinel lymph node biopsy'.

RESULTS

Long-term results from randomized studies have shown no difference in disease-free or overall survival between neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. The main benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is its ability to downstage large tumours with a view to treatment by breast-conserving surgery, although there is a non-significant increase in the local recurrence rate. Initial results of neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials using newer agents such as taxanes have demonstrated a greater pathological complete response. Whether this will translate into better long-term survival remains to be seen.

[Association of taxanes and radiotherapy: preclinical and clinical studies]

Taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) stabilized microtubules against depolymerization, and inhibit their function. Their radiosensitizing properties have been discovered more than 10 years ago; they synchronized tumor cells in G2/M phase, the most radiosensitive portion of the cell cycle. Other radiosensitizing mechanisms have been also discussed, as reoxygenation, promotion of radio-apoptosis and antiangiogenic cooperation. Many phase I and II studies have been performed, essentially in bronchus and head and neck carcinomas. In lung cancer, paclitaxel was delivered weekly at a dose of 60 mg/m2. Many studies combined cisplatin or carboplatin with paclitaxel, demonstrating that this combination is feasible and efficient. Only one phase III trial was reported; after two cycles of chemotherapy for inoperable lung cancers, radiotherapy was delivered, with or without paclitaxel radiosensitization: a benefit in disease-free survival was observed for the combination arm. In head and neck carcinomas, conomitant association of cisplatin, paclitaxel and radiation was feasible and showed promising results. Clinical trials with docetaxel are in progress.

Radiotherapy for invasive breast cancer in North America and Europe: Results of a survey

PURPOSE

To document and explain the current radiotherapeutic management of invasive breast cancer in North America and Europe. We also identified a number of areas of agreement, as well as controversy, toward which additional clinical research should be directed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An original survey questionnaire was developed to assess radiation oncologists' self-reported management of breast cancer. The questionnaire was administered to physician members of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. We present the results of the comparative analysis of 702 responses from North America and 435 responses from Europe.

RESULTS

Several areas of national and international controversy were identified, including the selection of appropriate candidates for postmastectomy radiation therapy (RT) and the appropriate management of the regional lymph nodes after mastectomy, as well as after lumpectomy. Only 40.7% and 36.1% of respondents would use postmastectomy RT in patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes in North America and Europe, respectively. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was offered more frequently by North American than European respondents (p <0.0001) and more frequently by academic than nonacademic respondents in North America (p < 0.05). The average radiation fraction size was larger in Europe than in North America (p < 0.01). European respondents offered RT to the internal mammary chain more often than did the North American respondents (p < 0.001). North American respondents were more likely to offer RT to the supraclavicular fossa (p < 0.001) and axilla (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Marked differences were found in physician opinions regarding the management of breast cancer, with statistically significant international differences in patterns of care. This survey highlighted areas of controversy, providing support for international randomized trials to optimize the RT management of invasive breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Results in Alterations in Preoperative Tumor Marker Status

Neoadjuvant therapy followed by breast-conserving surgery has become an acceptable option for patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Although a distinct survival benefit has not been demonstrated using this approach, several questions have been raised following such therapy including its effects on receptor status and tumor markers. The current study retrospectively reviews estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2-neu status in 55 consecutive patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Preoperative and postoperative tumor markers were available for 43 of the 55 patients (78%). The pathologic complete tumor response rate (pCR) for this group was 19 per cent (8/43). Of those patients who did not achieve a pCR (n = 35), a change in tumor markers was seen in 25.7 per cent (9/35) of patients. When compared to a control group not undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, a significantly higher percent change in marker expression was noted in the neoadjuvant group (25.7% vs 5.9%, P = 0.046). ER, PR, and HER2-neu status remain important prognostic indicators for breast cancer. Tumor markers are useful in planning adjuvant therapy regimens. In this review, nearly 19 per cent of patients achieved a pCR. In patients not achieving a pCR, one in four patients had at least one change in tumor marker status. This study demonstrates the importance of establishing receptor and marker status prior to neoadjuvant therapy, as many patients will achieve a pCR and make tumor analysis impossible. Postoperative marker studies should be performed given the possibility of a change in status. The clinical relevance of this data will require further long-term follow-up. Until such data becomes available, caution should be considered when basing adjuvant therapy regimens on preoperative tumor marker studies alone.

Chemotherapy is more effective in patients with breast cancer not expressing steroid hormone receptors: a study of preoperative treatment

PURPOSE

The purpose of this research was to identify factors predicting response to preoperative chemotherapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In a large volume laboratory using standard immunohistochemical methods, we reviewed the pretreatment biopsies and histologic specimens at final surgery of 399 patients with large or locally advanced breast cancer (cT2-T4, N0-2, M0) who were treated with preoperative chemotherapy. The incidence of pathological complete remission and the incidence of node-negative status at final surgery were assessed with respect to initial pathological and clinical findings. Menopausal status, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status [absent (0% of the cells positive) versus expressed], clinical tumor size, histologic grade, Ki-67, Her-2/neu expression, and type and route of chemotherapy were considered.

RESULTS

High rates of pathological complete remission were associated with absence of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor expression (P < 0.0001), and grade 3 (P = 0.001). Significant predictors of node-negative status at surgery were absence of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor expression (P < 0.0001), clinical tumor size <5 cm (P < 0.001), and use of infusional regimens (P = 0.003). The chance of obtaining pathological complete remission or node-negative status for patients with endocrine nonresponsive tumors compared with those having some estrogen receptor or progesterone receptor expression was 4.22 (95% confidence interval, 2.20-8.09, 33.3% versus 7.5%) and 3.47 (95% confidence interval, 2.09-5.76, 42.9% versus 21.7%), respectively. Despite the significantly higher incidence of pathological complete remission and node-negative status achieved by preoperative chemotherapy for patients with estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor absent disease, the disease-free survival was significantly worse for this cohort compared with the low/positive expression cohort (4-year disease-free survival %: 41% versus 74%; hazard ratio 3.22; 95% confidence interval, 2.28-4.54; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Response to preoperative chemotherapy is significantly higher for patients with endocrine nonresponsive tumors. New chemotherapy regimens or combinations should be explored in this cohort of patients with poor outcome. For patients with endocrine responsive disease, the role of preoperative endocrine therapies should be studied.

Combined use of MRI and PET to monitor response and assess residual disease for locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the hypothesis that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) are complementary and valuable in monitoring response and assessing residual disease of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We sought to determine if the combination of the two modalities was more accurate than either alone and could provide better guidance in patient management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen lesions in 15 women with LABC were evaluated with MRI, PET, and clinical breast examination (CBE) before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The pre- and posttherapy maximal tumor sizes on MRI and CBE and standard uptake values (SUVs) on PET served as the measurements for clinical response classification and residual disease assessment. Pathologic assessment provided the reference for macroscopic and microscopic pathologic tumor response and residual disease.

RESULTS

PET correctly predicted lack of pathologic response in five of six cases (83%); CBE predicted correctly in one of six (17%) cases, and MRI predicted correctly in zero of six cases. When PET predicted response, MRI defined the extent of macroscopic pathologic residual disease accurately in 9 of 10 cases (90%). When posttherapy MRI showed complete response (CR) in eight cases, macroscopic pathologic complete response (mCR) was observed in all eight cases (100%).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that combined use of MRI and PET is complementary and offers advantages over CBE. PET was more accurate in predicting pathologic nonresponse. Complete response by MRI correlated well with macroscopic pathologic complete response.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Use in Patient Management

Breast cancer is a significant health problem worldwide and is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in women. Preoperative chemotherapy has become the standard of care for patients with locally advanced disease and is being used more frequently in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Sentinel lymph node biopsy has shown great promise in the surgical management of breast cancer patients, but its use following preoperative chemotherapy is yet to be determined. Eleven studies have been published with respect to the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ten studies showed favourable results, with the ability to identify a sentinel lymph node in 84% to 98% of cases, and reported false negative rates ranging from 0% to 20%. The accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy following preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer ranges from 88% to 100%, with higher rates when specific techniques and inclusion criteria are applied. The published literature supports the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy for assessment of the axilla in patients with clinically node-negative disease following preoperative chemotherapy.

Decreased identification rate of sentinel lymph node after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

We prospectively studied the feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy by comparing the identification rate and the false-negative rate (FNR) with the results obtained from the patients without chemotherapy. From October 2001 to March 2003, a total of 284 consecutive patients who underwent SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) at the Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center were enrolled. Of the 284 patients, 54 underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to operation. The sentinel lymph node (SLN) was mapped by radioactive colloid alone or in combination with blue dye. All SLNs were evaluated by 2 mm serial sections after hematoxylin-eosin staining. The overall SLN identification rate was 91.9% (261/284): 72.2% (39/54) of the patients after chemotherapy and 96.5% (222/230) of the patients without chemotherapy. These results suggest that preoperative chemotherapy significantly affects lymphatic mapping ( p< 0.001). Among the patients with chemotherapy, there were 3 false negatives in 39 successfully mapped tumors, yielding an FNR of 11.1% (3/27), a negative prediction value (NPV) of 80.0% (12/15), and an accuracy of 92.3% (36/39). There were 10 false negatives among 222 successfully detected patients without chemotherapy, yielding an FNR of 9.9% (10/101), an NPV of 92.4% (121/131), and an accuracy of 95.5% (212/222). These results were not statistically different when compared ( p > 0.05). Although the SLN identification rate significantly decreased after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, SLNB could accurately predict axillary status. Thus SLNB can be an alternative to ALND even after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cases of successful identification of the SLN.

Accurate Axillary Nodal Staging Can be Achieved after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Lymph node status remains the most important prognostic indicator for breast cancer. Recent reports have established that the accuracy of assessing lymph node status is proportional to the number of nodes dissected. The accuracy of axillary staging following neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been cited as a technical concern due to limited node retrieval. The current study attempts to evaluate the ability to perform sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and formal axillary node dissection (AND) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to compare these results with non-neoadjuvant patients. One hundred sixteen consecutive patients undergoing SNB with simultaneous AND were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-two of these patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to AND. Overall success rate in performing SNB in the neoadjuvant group was 95 per cent, and no false negatives have been noted to date. The overall SNB success rate in the non-neoadjuvant group was also 95 per cent with a false negative rate of 3 per cent. After AND in each group, a mean of 21 nodes were retrieved in the neoadjuvant group and 17.9 nodes in the non-neoadjuvant group ( P = 0.018). In the neoadjuvant group, there were 19 node positive patients (42%) and 21 patients (28%) in the non-neoadjuvant group ( P = 0.16). The mean number of positive nodes per patient was also similar between the two groups (2.9 in the neoadjuvant group vs 1.67 in the non-neoadjuvant group, P = 0.10). Following neoadjuvant therapy, accurate evaluation of the axilla is feasible. In this study, the mean number of nodes is significantly different in favor of the neoadjuvant group, but there is no significant difference in the number of node positive patients identified or in the mean number of positive nodes identified per patient. SNB is technically feasible with accuracy similar to that seen in patients with no history of neoadjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy extends the use of breast-conserving therapy without sacrificing the ability to accurately stage the axilla either by use of standard axillary dissection or SNB.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

We surveyed single-center and multi-center studies pertaining to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to compare the results with those of our current study to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

From October 2001 to July 2003, 80 patients who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy underwent curative surgery and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after SLNB at the Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center. A MEDLINE search was performed using the keywords breast cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Our results showed that 42 (52.6%) of 80 patients had downstaging of the primary tumor; 9 patients (11.3%) had pathologic complete response (pCR) and 33 (41.3%) had pathologic partial response (pPR). 26 patients (32.5%) showed complete axillary clearance after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Among them, 5 patients (6.3%) revealed pCR of both the primary tumor and axillary metastasis. SLNB was successful in 61 of 80 patients (76.3%) and there were 3 false negatives, yielding a false negative rate (FNR) of 7.3% (3/41), a negation prediction value (NPV) of 87.0%(20/23), and an accuracy of 95.1% (58/61). Thirteen out of 16 studies retrieved by to MEDLINE pertaining SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy concluded its feasibility and accuracy with a identification rate of 82%-100% and a FNR of 17-100%.

CONCLUSION

Most studies, including ours, concluded that SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate and could be an alternative to ALND.

Pathologic Changes in Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Implications for the Assessment of Response

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (also known as preoperative or primary chemotherapy) is the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced breast cancer. One of the main advantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is that it allows for assessment of pathologic response to treatment. Clinical and radiologic evaluations of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy are based on change in tumor size, and the correlation with pathologic response is often inaccurate. Pathologic evaluation of tumor size remains the gold standard for evaluation of residual tumor after chemotherapy. Chemotherapy-induced histomorphologic change is commonly observed in posttreatment resection specimens and can contribute to the less-than-perfect correlation between the clinical assessment of tumor size and the pathologic measurement. Therefore, accurate histologic mapping to the macroscopic and radiologic appearance of the tumor bed is necessary. Cytopathologic changes are also common in residual cancer cells after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and have uncertain clinical relevance. There is a role for the development of new histologic approaches to augment the pathologic and clinical assessment and provide information on the differential response, particularly for tumors in which less than pathologic complete response is achieved.

Proliferation markers predictive of the pathological response and disease outcome of patients with breast carcinomas treated by anthracycline-based preoperative chemotherapy

The cell proliferation rate has been correlated to the response of breast carcinomas to preoperative chemotherapy (CT) and to disease outcome. However, this parameter is not yet used to select which tumours should be treated with preoperative CT. Furthermore, there is no consensus in the method used to evaluate cell proliferation. In poor prognosis breast carcinomas (PPBCs) treated by intensive preoperative CT, we compared the predictive value of S phase fraction (SPF), mitotic index (MI) and Ki67. We also evaluated the prognostic significance of the variation of the MI after CT. A series of 55 T2-T4N0N1M0 breast carcinomas were treated with 4 cycles of cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and doxorubicin. SPF was determined by flow cytometry on pre-therapeutic needle aspiration products. MI and Ki67 were evaluated on pre-therapeutic biopsy samples and on the tumours after CT. Fifteen patients (27%) had a pathological complete response (pCR), whereas 40 (73%) had residual disease. All three proliferative markers were found to have predictive value, but this value was higher for MI than for SPF (P = 0.04) and Ki67 (P = 0.03): the rate of pCR was 50% in cases with MI > 17/3.3 mm2, but was only 7% in cases with MI under this threshold (P = 0.0003). A significant decrease of MI (mean 10.97) was observed after CT (P = 0.001). Furthermore, we observed that even for patients with residual tumour, the variation of MI after CT was a prognostic parameter and overall survival. The sequential analysis of MI in breast cancers treated by preoperative CT thus provides a surrogate for predicting long-term outcome.

Change in tumor cellularity of breast carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a variable in the pathologic assessment of response

BACKGROUND

Complete pathologic response of breast carcinoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a well defined outcome that correlates with prolonged survival. Categorization of incomplete response depends on accurate measurement of residual tumor size but is complicated by the variable histopathologic changes that occur within the tumor bed. In the current study, the authors investigated the contribution of assessing tumor cellularity in the pathologic evaluation of response to chemotherapy.

METHODS

The slides from diagnostic core needle biopsy and the subsequent matched resection specimens were examined in 240 patients with breast carcinoma: 120 "treated" patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 120 "control" patients who received primary surgical management within a few weeks of diagnosis. Clinical response and residual tumor size were evaluated in 108 treated patients who completed a clinical trial with paclitaxel and then received combined 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. Tumor cellularity was assessed from hematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue sections as the percentage of tumor area that contained invasive carcinoma.

RESULTS

After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor cellularity decreased from a median of 40% in core needle biopsy to 10% in resection specimens (P<0.01; Wilcoxon signed rank test). The cellularity of core needle biopsy (median, 30%) tended to underestimate the cellularity of resection specimens (median, 40%) in the control group (P<0.01). Changes in cellularity varied within each clinical response category, particularly partial response and minor response. The greatest reduction was observed in the cellularity of residual primary tumors that measured < or =1 cm (pathologic T1a [pT1a] and pT1b tumors), but changes in cellularity varied in the pT1, pT2, and pT3 residual tumor categories. The shape of the distribution of tumor size, expressed as the greatest dimension in cm, was similar in the control group and the treatment group (excluding complete pathologic response); however, when residual tumor size and cellularity were combined, the distribution of pathologic response shifted left (toward complete response) with a steep decline, suggesting that many tumors had a large reduction in cellularity but little change in the tumor size.

CONCLUSIONS

Cellularity of the tumor mass was reduced significantly by neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the change varied widely in different categories of clinical response. Although residual tumors measuring < or =1 cm in greatest dimension had the most reduction in tumor cellularity, there was broad variability for all residual tumor groups (pT1-pT3). The frequency distribution of residual tumor size was altered markedly by the inclusion of tumor cellularity, indicating that the product of pathologic size and tumor cellularity may provide more accurate pathologic response information than tumor size alone.

Preoperative evaluation of prognosis in breast cancer patients by [(18)F]2-Deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography

PURPOSE

[18F]2-Deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) was applied to breast cancer patients for the purpose of preoperative evaluation of patient prognosis with more accuracy than conventional TNM staging.

METHODS

FDG-PET was performed preoperatively in 81 patients with breast cancer, and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of tumors as well as the focal accumulation of FDG in the axillary region (PET-N status) were investigated in their association with patient prognosis.

RESULTS

The SUVmax high group (n=40) showed a significantly (P=0.011) poorer prognosis than the SUVmax low group (n=41) (5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates; 75.0% vs 95.1%). FDG-PET was more accurate in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node status than physical examination, i.e., diagnostic accuracy was 80% and 70% for FDG-PET and physical examination, respectively. The combination of high SUVmax and positive PET-N (+) was shown to be a highly significant risk factor being independent of the clinical T and N factors, i.e., patients with high SUVmax and positive PET-N (+) showed a significantly (P<0.001) poorer prognosis than the other patients (5-year DFS rates; 44.4% vs 96.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that FDG-PET is useful in the preoperative evaluation of prognosis in breast cancer patients with more accuracy than conventional TNM staging. It is expected that the indication of neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be decided more precisely by the preoperative evaluation of patient prognosis with FDG-PET due to a possible elimination of overtreatment for those who have good prognosis and, thus, need not to be treated with chemotherapy.

Radiation-induced Histopathologic Changes of the Breast

The increasingly frequent use of radiation therapy (RT) and systemic chemotherapy (CT) in the treatment of breast carcinoma requires surgical pathologists and cytologists to be familiar with the variable histologic changes initiated by these agents. Both treatment modalities can cause severe epithelial abnormalities, which are difficult to distinguish from carcinoma. The progression or regression of these histologic abnormalities in nonneoplastic breast tissue have not been extensively evaluated. Our study used 120 post-RT biopsy or mastectomy specimens from 117 patients (3 had bilateral carcinoma treated with RT) yielding 120 specimens. The interval from post-RT to biopsy or mastectomy ranged from 1 to 229 months with 25 of the specimens obtained 1 to 12 months after cessation of RT and 95 more than a year post-RT. Twenty-seven specimens were from >6 years after RT. The histologic features of pretreatment and posttreatment specimens were graded (0-3) blindly for each histologic feature to include stromal vascular and fibroblastic changes and epithelial cell changes of the terminal duct lobular unit and extralobular ducts as well as terminal duct lobular unit fibrosis/atrophy. The changes between the pre- and post-RT grades were all statistically significant (P < 0.05) using multiple nonparametric statistical methods and the parametric Student t test. The specimens obtained within the first year post-RT were compared with those from >1 year post-RT, >3 years post-RT, and >6 years post-RT. None of the histologic features evaluated showed significant changes over the various time intervals regardless of the statistical method used. The absence of regression of the radiation-induced histologic changes over time mandates the surgical pathologist be alert to the possibility of RT or CT even without that therapeutic history.

Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project

BACKGROUND

The current report represents a 12-year clinicopathologic update of an earlier 5-year analysis of 180 patients with lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) who were treated with local excision and subsequent surveillance only.

METHODS

Nineteen pathologic characteristics of LCIS were assessed as potential predictors of invasive and noninvasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and contralateral breast tumor recurrence (CBTR) as well as mortality.

RESULTS

Overall, only 26 IBTRs (14.4%) and 14 CBTRs (7.8%) were observed. Nine IBTRs (5.0% of the total cohort) and 10 CBTRs (5.6% of the total cohort) were invasive carcinomas. Eight of 9 IBTRs (88.9%) and 6 of 8 invasive CBTRs (75%) that had histologic sections available for review were of the lobular invasive type. Ninety-six percent of all IBTRs and 100% of invasive IBTRs occurred within the same site as the index LCIS. The numbers of invasive IBTRs were comparable within and after 5 years (5 invasive IBTRs vs. 4 IBTRs). Recurrences of invasive CBTR occurred later than recurrences of invasive IBTR, with 70% of invasive CBTRs recognized after 5 years compared with 44% of invasive IBTRs. It was found that Grade 2-3 LCIS was significantly predictive for invasive IBTR when combined with the number of recurrences of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) alone or with LCIS. Only 2 patients in the cohort (1.1%) succumbed to breast carcinoma; 1 patient had a prior invasive IBTR, and the other patient had an invasive CBTR. The reasons for the lower frequency of invasive recurrences and the higher proportions of the lobular invasive phenotype than noted by others are discussed along with the impact of the findings on the nomenclature, precursor nature, and treatment of LCIS.

CONCLUSIONS

LCIS is a more indolent form of in situ breast carcinoma than DCIS, with which it shares other features of its natural history, particularly very low mortality rates. There is no compelling reason to surgically treat LCIS other than conservatively. The values of other adjuvant modalities in the management of LCIS are discussed. The authors acknowledge that their findings are based on relatively few events and, even at 12 years, may be regarded as "preliminary". Nonetheless, their findings may reflect the true biologic nature of LCIS.

Preoperative systemic treatment: prediction of responsiveness

The use of predictive factors allows a more effective use of available therapies by enabling clinicians to distinguish patients likely to obtain substantial benefit from treatment from those for whom the same therapy is less likely to be effective. A most relevant aspect of clinical research is thus to develop alternative therapeutic approaches which are more efficacious for this latter group, particularly important since treatment effects are likely to be small. In the preoperative setting several predictors of response were identified. They include: diameter of the lesion (larger lesions respond less than smaller lesions), MIB-1 increased expression associated with increased response to chemotherapy, and estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) expression in the tumor typically associated with increased response to endocrine therapies. Other factors include HER-2/neu overexpression, which is a target for treatment with the humanized monoclonal antibody against its extracellular domain, is hypothesized to increase response to anthracycline combination chemotherapy and to lead to an improved response to some endocrine agents (e.g. letrozole) rather than to others. Although primary endocrine therapy demonstrated activity and low profile of side effects in selected populations of older patients, it is infrequently used. On the other hand, chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment being considered to be a more active and better documented option. Experience at the European Institute of Oncology on 399 patients with large or locally advanced breast cancer (cT2-T4, N0-2, M0) treated with primary chemotherapy, indicated that a proper selection of primary treatment should be based on tumor characteristics such as ER and PgR status. In particular, patients with tumors with no ER and PgR expression (endocrine-unresponsive disease) at the baseline core-biopsy had a significantly higher response rate to chemotherapy if compared with tumors with some ER/PgR expression. In fact, the absence of ER and PgR expression was the strongest predictors of pCR at the multivariate analysis (P<0.0001). Information on endocrine responsiveness before primary systemic therapy will lead to better tailoring of treatment modalities, thus avoiding chemotherapy in selected populations where other approaches (e.g. endocrine primary therapy) might be more useful.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma: multidisciplinary considerations of benefits and risks

BACKGROUND

The majority of patients with breast carcinoma receive chemotherapy as a component of multimodality treatment. Over the past decade, it has become increasingly more common to deliver chemotherapy first, but this has raised new questions within all disciplines of cancer management.

METHODS

The authors reviewed published studies on the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma on the practice of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, pathology, and radiology.

RESULTS

Treating breast carcinoma with neoadjuvant chemotherapy has several advantages, such as providing the earliest possible treatment against preexisting micrometastases, offering selected patients breast conservation therapy, and allowing for measurement of disease response, which can then be used to customize subsequent chemotherapy. However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy affects the practice not only of medical oncology, but also has important implications for the specialties of surgery, radiology, pathology, and radiation oncology. The current review addressed the new opportunities and challenges within the multidisciplinary care of breast carcinoma provided by neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The complexity of the issues led the authors to conclude that patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy are likely to benefit from a coordinated multidisciplinary approach to their care.

Breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive markers and relation with outcome

The aim of this study was to provide a better insight into breast cancer response to chemotherapy. Chemotherapy improves outcome in breast cancer patients. The effect of cytotoxic treatment cannot be predicted for individual patients. Therefore, the identification of tumour characteristics associated with tumour response and outcome is of great clinical interest. We studied 97 patients, who received anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumour samples were taken prior to and after chemotherapy. We quantified the response to chemotherapy clinically and pathologically and determined histological and molecular tumour characteristics. We assessed changes in the expression of Bcl-2, ER, P53 HER2 and Ki-67. Association with response and outcome was tested for all parameters. The experimental results showed 15 clinical (17%) and three (3%) pathological complete remissions. There were 18 (20%) clinical vs 29 (33%) pathological nonresponders. The expression of most markers was similar before and after chemotherapy. Only Ki-67 was significantly decreased after chemotherapy. Factors correlated with response were: large tumour size, ER negativity, high Ki-67 count and positive P53 status. Tumour response and marker expression did not predict disease-free or overall survival. In conclusion, clinical and pathological response assessments are poorly associated. Proliferation decreases significantly after chemotherapy. ER negativity and a high proliferation index are associated with better response. HER2 status does not predict response, and outcome is not related to tumour response.