Morbidity outcome in early versus conventional tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized controlled trial

A coronary artery bypass "fast-track" protocol is practical and realistic in a rural environment

BACKGROUND

In this study we determine retrospectively whether assignment of all patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting to a "fast-track" protocol (FT) is practical and realistic in our rural institution.

METHODS

We compared the outcome of 266 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting who were fast-tracked in 1996 with that of 266 consecutive patients who were managed conventionally (NFT) in 1994. The surgical techniques were comparable in both groups; however, FT anesthesia used inhalational agents and short-acting narcotics. All comparisons were performed using the Student's t test or the chi 2 test.

RESULTS

Postoperatively 95% of the FT group were extubated by 24 hours compared with 0% in the NFT group (p < 0.0001). The mean intensive care unit length of stay in the FT group was 1.7 +/- 0.8 days, whereas it was 2.6 +/- 0.6 days in the NFT group (p < 0.001). The mean postoperative length of stay was 6.4 +/- 1.2 days in the FT group compared with 7.5 +/- 0.9 days in the NFT group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in 30-day morbidity/mortality. There was a substantial cost savings in the FT group.

CONCLUSIONS

The fast-track protocol can be successful without any compromise of patient care. Early discharge from the hospital, however, is not always feasible.

Early vs conventional extubation after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

OBJECTIVES

Sedation and ventilation overnight after cardiac surgery is common practice. However, early extubation may be feasible with no increase in postoperative complications. This study examines (1) if early extubation is possible in a significant number of patients, (2) if it reduces ICU stay, and (3) if this practice increases postoperative complications.

DESIGN

Prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We randomized 404 consecutive patients to early extubation (7 to 11 h postoperatively) (group A, 201 patients) or conventional extubation (between 8 and 12 AM the following day) (group B, 203 patients). Variables included type and severity of the disease, surgical risk, type of operation, operative incidences, postoperative complications, duration of mechanical ventilation, intubation and ICU stay, bleeding, reoperation, vasoactive drugs, and mortality.

RESULTS

Groups were comparable. Extubation within the preestablished time was successful in 60.2% of patients in group A and 74.4% in group B. Median ICU stay was 27 h in group A and 44 h in group B (p=0.008). Discharge from ICU within the first 24 h postoperatively was 44.3% in group A and 30.5% in group B (p=0.006). There was no significant difference in complications between groups. Successfully extubated patients in group A had more reintubation and prolonged ventilation than in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Sixty percent of our patients were extubated within 11 h of operation. (2) As a result, the length of stay in ICU was reduced and the percentage of patients discharged within 24 h was increased. (3) There was no increase in clinically important postoperative complications.

Determinants of longer duration of endotracheal intubation after adult cardiac operations

BACKGROUND

Poor pulmonary reserve is a risk factor that is used to exclude some patients from major operations. However, the value of routine spirometry in patients undergoing cardiac operations has not been widely evaluated.

METHODS

The outcomes of 586 consecutive adult patients undergoing cardiac operations were reviewed retrospectively to assess predictors of longer duration of endotracheal intubation.

RESULTS

By univariate analysis, congestive failure (p < 0.001), cardiomegaly (p = 0.002), recent myocardial infarction (p = 0.039), priority of operation (p = 0.005), previous cardiac operation (p < 0.001), and renal insufficiency (p = 0.002) increased the risk of longer endotracheal intubation. Spirometry (forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume at 1 second, the ratio of forced expiratory volume at 1 second to forced vital capacity) did not correlate with longer endotracheal intubation. Perioperative complications, such as myocardial infarction (p < 0.001), coma, reexploration for bleeding, and reduced cardiac output (p < 0.001 each), correlated with longer duration of intubation. By multiple regression, priority of operation (p = 0.03), congestive failure (p = 0.02), and previous cardiac operation (p = 0.005) among preoperative risks and bleeding, reduced cardiac output, stroke, coma, and MB fraction of creatine kinase released postoperatively (p < 0.001 each) predicted longer duration of endotracheal intubation.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative cardiac function and the occurrence of complications are more significant than preoperative pulmonary function in determining the duration of endotracheal intubation after cardiac operation. Routine spirometry is probably unnecessary for most adult cardiac patients.

Advances in anesthesia for cardiac surgery: an overview for the 1990s

Anesthetic care for patients undergoing cardiac surgery has changed dramatically in the past 10 years. Examples of such change include same-day admissions, "fast-track" protocols, selective use of pulmonary artery catheters, transesophageal echocardiography, and the introduction of new drugs such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors and antifibrinolytic agents. Under pressure from our peers and those funding health care, we are making major efforts to reduce costs and the length of hospitalization while maintaining high quality of care.

Comparison of lorazepam alone vs lorazepam, morphine, and perphenazine for cardiac premedication

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of two premedication regimens on cardiorespiratory variables, sedation, and anxiety in patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Sixty-eight patients were monitored for 1.5 hr before and 2.0 hr after premedication with lorazepam (0.03 mg.kg-1 sl), morphine (0.15 mg.kg-1 im), and perphenazine (0.05 mg.kg-1 im) [Group 1], or with lorazepam (0.03 mg.kg-1 sl) and saline (1.5 ml im) [Group 2]. All were continuously monitored with a 12-lead ECG ST monitors, respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP), digital pulse oximetry, intra-arterial blood pressure, and arterial blood gas analysis. Sedation and anxiety scores were also recorded.

RESULTS

The incidence and duration of myocardial ischaemia was low and similar in Groups 1 and 2. Patients in Group 1, but not in Group 2, had a greater number of events (P < 0.04) and duration (P < 0.02) of O2 desaturation; higher PaCO2 (P < 0.001), and more haemodynamic events (P < 0.006) after premedication when compared with baseline. There was no difference in RIP or ECG variables between the two groups. Following premedication, both groups reported reduced anxiety scores and elevated sedation scores (P < 0.01), with sedation greater in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In CABG patients, premedication with lorazepam provides adequate anxiolysis and sedation, and the addition of morphine and perphenazine results in elevated PaCO2, arterial haemoglobin desaturation, and potentially adverse haemodynamic changes.

Routine chest roentgenography on admission to intensive care unit after heart operations: is it of any value?

The need for routine immediate postoperative chest roentgenography after heart operations has recently been questioned. In this study we investigated the impact of routine postoperative chest roentgenography on treatment instituted in the cardiovascular intensive care unit immediately after heart operations done via median sternotomy. A total of 404 random patients admitted to the cardiovascular intensive care unit underwent clinical (positioning of endotracheal tube, nasogastric tube, and pulmonary artery catheter) and laboratory (oxygenation) assessment by a cardiovascular intensive care unit physician according to a strict protocol. After clinical assessment, chest roentgenography was done for all admitted patients and the findings reviewed by the same physician. Pathologic conditions noted were recorded on the study form together with any required treatment. Eighteen patients (4.5%) out of 404 required intervention because of abnormalities detected by the chest x-ray film but not predicted by the initial physical and laboratory assessment. None of the pathologic conditions detected was life threatening. We conclude that chest roentgenography done on admission to the cardiovascular intensive care unit should be done only if clinical and laboratory assessment indicate the possibility of underlying pathologic conditions that can only be confirmed or diagnosed by chest roentgenography.