Testicular cancer

Incorporating non-biological factors into the TNM staging system for better prognostication and decision-making in testicular cancer

BACKGROUND

We combined county-level socioeconomic status (SES), marital status and insurance status to introduce NBF-stage, which were further incorporated into the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system to generate an integrated staging system for better prognostication and decision-making for testicular cancer patients.

METHODS

15,324 eligible patients diagnosed with primary testicular cancer between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2015 were strictly selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Independent survival predictors were determined based on Cox proportional hazards model. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves were conducted to describe the difference in predicting survival probability and the Multivariate Cox proportion hazard regression analyses were established to compare the cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) difference among NBF stages or NBF-TNM subgroups.

RESULTS

County-level SES, marital status and insurance status were independent prognostic non-biological factors (NBFs) in our study (P < 0.05). NBF-stage (combination of SES, marital status, and insurance status) was also an independent survival predictor in TC (P < 0.05). NBF1 patients had 167% increased risk of cancer-specific mortality (CSM) as compared to NBF0 patients in testicular cancer (P < 0.01). And NBF0 patients all had a better CSS as compared to NBF1 patients of the same TNM stage both in seminoma and non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of NBFs into AJCC TNM staging system in testicular cancer would potentially impact treatment decisions where treatments would not be rendered for a typically curable cancer with multi-modal therapy.

Emerging Prognostic Biomarkers in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: Looking Beyond Established Practice

Testicular germ cell tumors are unique among solid cancers. Historically, this disease was deadly if progressed beyond the stage I. The implementation of cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens has drastically changed the clinical outcome of metastatic testicular cancer. Several biomarkers were established to refine the prognosis by International Germ Cell Collaborative Group in 1997. Among these, the most significant were primary tumor site; metastatic sites, such as non-pulmonary visceral metastases; and the amplitude of serum tumor markers α-fetoprotein, β-chorionic gonadotropin, and lactate dehydrogenase. Since then, oncology has experienced discoveries of various molecular biomarkers to further refine the prognosis and treatment of malignancies. However, the ability to predict the prognosis and treatment response in germ cell tumors did not improve for many years. Clinical trials with novel targeting agents that were conducted in refractory germ cell tumor patients have proven to have negative outcomes. With the recent advances and developments, novel biomarkers emerge in the field of germ cell tumor oncology. This review article aims to summarize the current knowledge in the research of novel prognostic biomarkers in testicular germ cell tumors.