Report of the first International Liver Transplantation Society expert panel consensus conference on liver transplantation and hepatitis C

Management of hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation

Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been associated with progression to cirrhosis in approximately 20% of patients, 5 years postoperatively. Accelerated decompensation has also been noted when compared with cirrhosis in non-transplant patients. Different treatment strategies are available for recurrent HCV infection post-OLT, but efforts are hindered by the modest response rates, poor tolerability and the risk of rejection as well as graft loss. Anti-HCV immunoglobulin therapy to prevent graft infection with HCV has no established role at present but studies are ongoing. Treatment prior to transplantation in patients with decompensated cirrhosis has been evaluated but the results are too preliminary to make firm recommendations. Prophylactic interferon-based antiviral therapy in the early postoperative period to prevent graft infection was shown to have low response rates and high rates of adverse effects. Treatment of established recurrent HCV infection with combination peginterferon (pegylated interferon) and ribavirin is associated with 10-59% sustained virological response and the predictive value of a positive early virological response has been validated in the post-transplant setting. Improvement in inflammatory activity after viral eradication is well established, but fibrosis regression or stabilisation is less predictable and factors such as rejection and biliary complications may still contribute to graft loss. Most studies have initiated therapy at least 6 months postoperatively in order to optimise patient tolerance and enable the addition of ribavirin. The use of adjuvant agents to treat drug-induced neutropenia and anaemia in this population is evolving and becoming a crucial part of therapy. Determination of optimal doses of both pegylated interferon and ribavirin, and guidance on when to stop treatment, as well as improving tolerability are important steps in achieving higher response rates and minimising drug toxicity.

Rapidly progressive recurrent hepatitis C virus infection starting 9 days after liver transplantation

Early histological recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation (LT) has a negative impact on patient and graft survival. We report a case of histological recurrence of HCV occurring in the second week after LT. A 75-year-old woman with chronic HCV and hepatocellular carcinoma underwent LT with an organ from a 75-year-old HCV-negative deceased donor. After an uneventful early postoperative period, an increase in the transaminases was observed, and on postoperative day 9 day, the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was 673 IU/mL and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 300 IU/mL, with normal alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin. Analysis of liver biopsy samples showed diffuse necroinflammatory changes with acidophilic bodies and concomitant mild acute cellular rejection. Subsequently there was a further increase in the transaminases, and on postoperative day 13, the AST rose to 445 IU/mL and ALT to 992 IU/mL. Repeat biopsy was performed, and analysis of the samples revealed lymphocytic portal inflammation with lymphoid aggregates and mild interface hepatitis, parenchymal necrosis, activation of sinusoidal lining cells, and mild steatosis. The biopsy sample was characteristic for HCV recurrence. The HCV RNA level was 84,000,000 copies/mL, and markers for other viral causes were not present. The patient became jaundiced and her course progressively worsened. She died on day 87 after transplantation. To our knowledge, this is the earliest reported case of histological recurrence of HCV after LT. It illustrates the importance of older donor and recipient age in the same patient as cofactors for early HCV recurrence and poor outcome.

Viral load 1 week after liver transplantation, donor age and rejections correlate with the outcome of recurrent hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Early identification of patients at a higher risk of rapidly progressive recurrent hepatitis post liver transplantation (LT) could help to tailor antiviral therapy.

METHODS

We studied the correlation between early post-LT viral load and the histological and clinical outcomes of 49 consecutive patients (34 males, median age 55 years) in whom viraemia was monitored at days 0, 1, 7, 30, 180 and 365 after LT.

RESULTS

Hepatitis C recurred at histology in 38 of 42 (90.5%) patients. Early viral load after LT was higher in patients with rapidly progressive hepatitis C recurrence (day 7 median HCV-RNA levels: 5.84 vs 4.93 Log(10) IU/ml, P=0.003). Day 7 HCV-RNA levels >/=2.5 x 10(5) IU/ml, donor age >60 years and rejection episodes were independently associated with progression to cirrhosis within one year post-LT [P=0.018, odds ratio (OR) 27.59; P=0.043, OR 13.85 and P=0.048, OR 9.95, respectively]. Day 7 viraemia and rejection episodes were independently associated with 5-years survival. Day 7 viraemia, in combination with acute hepatitis and/or donor age, showed 80% sensitivity, 94% specificity and 90.5% diagnostic accuracy to identify severe recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Early post-LT HCV-RNA correlates with the severity of hepatitis C recurrence and in combination with donor age (>60 years) and rejections, identifies patients with a high risk of severe recurrence and candidates of cost-effective pre-emptive antiviral therapy.

Liver transplantation: an update 2007

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent attention in liver transplantation has focused on equity in organ allocation and management of posttransplant complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Adoption of the model for end-stage liver disease for liver allocation has been successful in implementing a system based on medical urgency rather than waiting time. Refinements are being studied in improving the prediction of mortality and improving transplant benefit by balancing pretransplant mortality and posttransplant survival. Emerging literature is examining expansion of the current criteria for transplantation of hepatocellular carcinoma and the role of neoadjuvant therapy. Chronic renal dysfunction after liver transplantation is a source of considerable morbidity. Nephron-sparing immunosuppression regimens are emerging with encouraging results. Hepatitis C virus infection is difficult to differentiate histologically from rejection, although newer markers are being developed. Antiviral and immunosuppressive strategies for reducing the severity of hepatitis C virus recurrence are discussed. Alcohol relapse is common after liver transplant in alcoholic liver disease patients and can lead to worse outcomes.

SUMMARY

Organ allocation tends to evolve under the model for end-stage liver disease with a focus on maximizing transplant benefit. Hepatitis C virus, hepatocellular carcinoma, chronic renal dysfunction and alcohol relapse are major challenges, and continued research in these areas will undoubtedly lead to better outcomes for transplant recipients.

Management of hepatitis C virus in the transplant patient

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a leading cause of chronic hepatitis, with 170 to 190 million people infected worldwide. The treatment of choice for patients who have HCV-related cirrhosis with or without hepatocellular carcinoma is liver transplantation. Virologic recurrence is constant after transplantation and results in chronic hepatitis in the vast majority. HCV infection now can be cured in a substantial proportion of liver transplant recipients. This review highlights the available strategies to improve outcome, including modification of factors that affect disease progression and the efficacy of antiviral therapy.

Liver transplantation for HCV cirrhosis: improved survival in recent years and increased severity of recurrent disease in female recipients: results of a long term retrospective study

In recent years, a worsening outcome of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive recipients and a faster progression of recurrent disease to overt cirrhosis has been reported. Our aims were to 1) assess patient survival and development of severe recurrent disease (Ishak fibrosis score > 3) in different transplant years; and 2) model the effects of pre- and post-liver transplantation (LT) variables on the severity of recurrent disease. A multicenter retrospective analysis was conducted on 502 consecutive HCV-positive transplant recipients between January 1990 and December 2002. Protocol liver biopsies were obtained at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 yr post-LT in almost 90% of the patients. All 502 patients were included in the overall survival analysis, while only the 354 patients with a follow-up longer than 1 yr were considered for the analysis of predictors of disease progression. The overall Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 78.7%, 66.3%, and 58.6%, at 12, 60, and 120 months, respectively, and a trend for a better patient survival over the years emerged from all 3 centers. The cumulative probability of developing HCV-related recurrent severe fibrosis (Ishak score 4-6) in the cohort of 354 patients who survived at least 1 yr remained unchanged over the years. Multivariate analysis indicated that older donors (P = 0.0001) and female gender of recipient (P = 0.02) were the 2 major risk factors for the development of severe recurrent disease, while the adoption of antilymphocytic preparations was associated with a less aggressive course (P = 0.03). Two of these prognostic factors, donor age and recipient gender, are easily available before LT and their combination showed an important synergy, such that a female recipient not only had a much higher probability of severe recurrent disease than a male recipient but her risk increased with the increasing age of the donor, reaching almost 100% when the age of the donor was 60 or older. In conclusion, a trend for a better patient survival was observed in more recent years but the cumulative probability of developing severe recurrent disease remained unchanged. The combination of a female recipient receiving an older graft emerged as a strong risk factor for a severe recurrence.

Therapeutic management of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Recurrent hepatitis C ranges from minimal damage to cirrhosis developing in a few months or years in a substantial proportion of transplant recipients. Different virus, host and donor factors are involved in the pathogenesis of recurrence, but many are poorly understood. Therapeutic strategies can be utilized in the pre-, peri- or posttransplantation setting. Antiviral therapy using interferon and ribavirin and modifying immunosuppression are the main strategies to prevent progression disease. The efficacy of interferon and ribavirin is limited and side effects, reduction/withdrawal are frequent. Current sustained virological response rates are approximately 28%. An optimal immunosuppression regimen has not been established. The choice of calcineurin inhibitors has not clearly been shown to affect histological hepatitis C virus (HCV) but higher cumulative exposure to corticosteroids to treat acute rejection is associated with more severe recurrence. The manner in which the doses of immunosuppression are modified has more influence on HCV recurrence than the use of a specific drug per se. Debate about the influence of immunosuppressive regimens on HCV recurrence is ongoing. Potential antifibrotic therapy and new agents targeting HCV infection and replication are emerging and are anticipated to be added to our armentarium in battling recurrent HCV post-LT.

Sustained virological response to antiviral therapy reduces mortality in HCV reinfection after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

HCV infection recurs almost in all HCV-positive patients receiving liver transplantation and carries a poor prognosis. Aim of this study was to analyze efficacy and effect on survival of antiviral therapy in this clinical setting.

METHODS

Pegylated-interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin were administered at a dose of 1 microg/kg of bwt weekly and 600-800 mg/day. Planned duration of treatment was 24 or 48 weeks according to HCV genotype. Patients who failed to respond at week 24 were considered as non-responders.

RESULTS

61 patients were enrolled. According to intention-to-treat analysis, 44 (72%) patients were considered as treatment failure (31 non-responders, 4 relapsers, 9 dropout). Sustained virological response was achieved in 17 cases (28%). Genotype 2, higher doses of antivirals and absence of histological cirrhosis were predictors of sustained virological response. In the follow up, patients with sustained virological response had a significantly lower mortality compared to patients with treatment failure (chi2=6.9; P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Response rate to antiviral therapy in HCV reinfection after liver transplantation is higher if a full dose of antiviral drugs is administered and if treatment starts before histological cirrhosis has developed. Sustained virological response improves patient survival.

Factors influencing the progression of fibrosis in patients with recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation under antiviral therapy: a retrospective analysis of 939 liver biopsies in a single center

Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation (LT) is a major problem, since up to 30% of patients develop cirrhosis only 5 years after LT in the absence of antiviral therapy. The aim of this study was to examine the rate of progression of fibrosis and its associated risk factors in patients submitted to an early antiviral treatment post-LT. Included in the study were 105 patients submitted to LT between September 1990 and December 2004, 70 of whom were treated with interferon and/or ribavirin. A total of 939 liver biopsies were studied. The median fibrosis stage was 0.8 after 1 year post-LT, 1.1 after 3 years, 1.3 after 5 years, and 1.5 after 10 years. LT recipients with fibrosis >2 (13% at 10 years) had a significantly reduced survival rate (63% vs. 87% at 10 years, P = 0.03). Univariate analysis disclosed that recipient male gender, antiviral therapy before LT, LT after 1998, induction immunosuppressive regimen including tacrolimus, induction immunosuppressive regimen including mycophenolate (or without azathioprine), and short duration of prednisolone (<12 months) were significantly associated with progression of fibrosis. In a multivariate analysis, recipient male gender (P = 0.04), antiviral treatment before LT (P = 0.001), and initial immunosuppressive regimen without azathioprine (P = 0.03) were associated with progression of fibrosis. In conclusion, our study has documented that fibrosis progression is not linear over time and that occurrence of severe fibrosis is related to previously described factors related to immunosuppressive regimen or donor age and also to a past history of pre-LT antiviral therapy.

Peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin in patients with hepatitis C virus and decompensated cirrhosis: a controlled study

BACKGROUND/AIM

To evaluate long-term outcomes in decompensated HCV-related cirrhotic patients treated with antiviral therapy.

METHODS

Of 129 eligible patients, 66 received peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin for 24 weeks, and 63 were controls. Survival and recurrence of liver failure events after therapy were main outcomes.

RESULTS

Therapy was tolerated by 27 patients, dose reduced in 26 for toxicity, and discontinued in 13 for intolerance. End-of-therapy and sustained virological response (SVR) rates were 82.6% and 43.5% for HCV 2/3 patients, and 30.2% and 7.0% for HCV 1/4 patients. During therapy, odds ratios for severe infections or deaths due to infection were 2.95 (95% C.I. 0.93-9.3) and 1.97 (95% C.I. 0.40-9.51) in treated patients as compared with controls. During a follow-up of 30 months off-therapy, decompensated events occurred in 52, 33, and 3 of controls, non-responders, and SVR patients. Odds ratios for ascites, encephalopathy, and oesophageal bleeding in treated patients significantly decreased as compared with controls. Annualized incidence of death was 2.34, 1.91, and 0 per 1000 patient-years, respectively, in controls, non-responders, and SVR patients. Survival curves showed early separation of SVR patients from both non-responders and controls at approximately 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In decompensated cirrhotics, HCV clearance by therapy is life-saving and reduces disease progression.

Recurrent hepatitis C post-transplantation: where are we now and where do we go from here? A report from the Canadian transplant hepatology workshop

Approximately 400 liver transplants are performed in Canada every year and close to 6000 per year in the United States. Forty per cent to 45% of all liver transplants are performed for patients with underlying hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease. These patients have a different natural history, new complication risks and different treatment efficacy than nontransplant HCV patients. Every effort must be made to identify those patients at highest risk for progressive liver disease post-transplant. Recurrent HCV is an Achilles' heel to transplant hepatology. The true natural history of this disease is only starting to unravel and many questions remain unanswered on the optimal management of these patients after liver transplantation. The present report summarizes the literature and ongoing research needs that are specific to HCV-related liver transplantation.

Immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors with respect to the outcome of HCV recurrence after liver transplantation: results of a meta-analysis

A controversy exists over whether the outcome of a hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infection-related liver transplant differs based on the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) used. We have performed a systematic review and a subsequent meta-analysis evaluating tacrolimus (Tac)-based vs. cyclosporine A-based immunosuppression in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients. Searches were conducted to locate randomized controlled trials comparing Tac vs. cyclosporine A. Data on HCV liver transplant recipients were obtained, independently of whether the study was specifically designed for patients with this disease or not. A fixed effects model was used for statistical pooling of the relative risks (RR) for the different outcomes. A total of 5 articles (366 patients) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Statistically significant differences between Tac-based vs. cyclosporine A-based therapies were not found for mortality (P = 0.11; RR = 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-1.08), graft survival (P = 0.37; RR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.61-1.21), biopsy-proven acute rejection (P = 0.65; RR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.61-1.36), corticoresistant acute rejection (P = 0.26; RR = 2.25; 95% CI, 0.55-9.29), and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (P = 0.92; RR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.41-2.26). In 1 study, no differences were detected regarding severe fibrosis at 1 yr. In conclusion, patient and graft survivals in HCV-positive liver transplant patients are similar independently of the CNI selected as basic immunosuppressant. Unfortunately, data on the severity of recurrence and effect on viremia are scarce. Well-designed randomized prospective studies are needed to determine whether there are differences between the 2 CNIs regarding these specific variables.

Rejection under alpha interferon therapy in liver transplant recipients

Interferon alpha (IFN) is the corner stone drug for the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C (HCV) in liver transplant (LT) recipients. One of its serious potential adverse effects is acute and chronic rejection. The aim of this study was to review our experience using IFN-based therapy, in order to examine the incidence and the risk factors for rejection, and the outcome of patients who developed rejection. Between September 1990 and December 2004, 70 LT recipients were treated. Patients started antiviral treatment 16 (1-137) months after LT. Histological follow-up was available in all patients according to protocol biopsies. Rejection was diagnosed and graded according to Banff classification. Twenty-one percent of patients developed acute rejection (5 mild, 9 moderate and 1 severe) during IFN-based therapy. Patients were treated for 8 (1-15) months prior to rejection. Previous history of acute rejection before IFN therapy and treatment with pegylated-IFN was significantly associated with rejection (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02, respectively). The rejection was successfully treated in 87% of patients. No chronic rejection or graft losses were observed. Acute rejection under IFN-based therapy often occurs in LT recipients, but early diagnosis with protocol biopsies and early treatment can lead to a favorable outcome.

Clinical and histological efficacy of pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant is controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical and histological efficacy of pegylated interferon alpha 2b (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin therapy of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation (LT). We prospectively included 47 liver transplant patients with: 1) a positive test for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-ribonucleic acid (RNA) in serum; 2) alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >45 UI/mL; and 3) a liver biopsy showing chronic hepatitis without rejection in the previous 2 months. Patients received PEG-IFN (1.5 microg/kg/week) and ribavirin (800-1,000 mg/day) for 12 months. Follow-up was based on biochemical (ALT), virological (RNA-HCV), and histological (liver biopsy) examinations. Follow-up lasted a minimum of 6 months after the end of antiviral therapy. Sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 23% of the patients. A total of 33 (70%) patients had normalized ALT levels at the end of therapy. Inflammatory portal and lobular score declined significantly in patients with SVR (P < 0.05) but not in nonresponder patients. Fibrosis did not change significantly in either group. SVR was significantly associated with low gamma-glutamyltransferase GGT (P = 0.04) and HCV-RNA levels (P = 0.03), a virological response at 12 weeks (P = 0.002) and patient's compliance (P = 0.04). Ten (21%) patients were withdrawn prematurely due to adverse effects. In conclusion, Therapy with PEG-IFN and ribavirin achieved SVR and a significant histological improvement in 23% of liver transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C. Toxicity is an important drawback of this therapy.

Antiviral therapy for hepatitis C in the setting of liver transplantation

Hepatitis C viremia after liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV) liver disease is universal. Progressive HCV disease after transplantation is the leading cause of death, graft failure, and retransplantation. Whether to treat, with which agents, and timing of therapy are unanswered questions. Timing options include pretransplantation, prophylactic, post-transplantation preemptive, and post-transplantation recurrence-based therapy. The latter is most commonly utilized. There are little data for each of these, much less comparisons. Pegylated interferon-alpha has supplanted standard interferon-alpha due to increased efficacy and is generally used in combination with ribavirin (RBV). Efficacy is less than in nontransplant settings due to immunosuppression, an increased prevalence of genotype 1 HCV, patient comorbidities, and decreased functional status. Administration of HCV therapy to cirrhotic patients prior to transplantation may eradicate or suppress HCV and prevent or reduce severity of recurrence. Sustained virological response (SVR) as high as 50% was attained in genotypes 2 or 3 HCV. Comparison of preemptive and histology-based post-transplantation HCV therapy should be done, and more data will be available on pretransplantation therapy. Post-transplant patients are less tolerant of therapy, particularly RBV. SVR, the primary goal of therapy, likely halts disease progression, but only 20% to 30% of treated patients achieve SVR. Preemptive therapy early after transplantation may have advantages due to the potential to delay or blunt severity of graft infection and recurrent hepatitis. In post-transplant therapy, RBV toxicity is attenuated in relation to decreased renal function, and side effects of interferon are more prominent. An ongoing trial will assess preemptive therapy with treatment after histologic recurrence. Novel anti-HCV therapies such as protease and polymerase inhibitors are emerging. These must be tested with urgency in the transplant setting. Retransplantation for progressive HCV disease is more controversial due to poor outcomes, graft shortage, and disease recurrence.

Liver transplantation from an identical twin without immunosuppression, with early recurrence of hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus reinfection after liver transplantation is universal and more severe than in nontransplant patients. Rejection episodes and immunosuppressive agents are considered risk factors for deterioration of recurrent hepatitis C. We report 2 cases of living donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatitis C-related cirrhosis who received right-lobe grafts from an identical twin. Thanks to genetic identity, no immunosuppressive drugs were administered during or after transplantation without rejection. Hepatitis C virus RNA kinetics showed a rapid increase following transplantation and liver biopsies 1 month after transplantation showed acute lobular hepatitis in both cases. Antiviral therapy using interferon alpha and ribavirin was started immediately, and both cases showed virological and histological response. In conclusion, avoidance of immunosuppression did not delay hepatitis C recurrence following transplantation, while early antiviral therapy without risk of rejection or immunosuppression led to successful viral eradication.

Hepatitis C virus and liver transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains the most common cause of hepatic failure requiring orthotopic liver transplantation, and the disparity between the number of patients in need of liver replacement and the number of organs available continues to grow. Unfortunately, without viral eradication before transplantation, HCV recurrence is universal and is associated with poor graft and patient survival. Despite expansion of the donor pool and attempts to suppress HCV activity with various pretransplant and posttransplant antiviral therapies, many questions remain. This article reviews the literature regarding the evaluation of patients for transplantation, the antiviral therapies available in the peritransplant period, the immunosuppressive regimens, used, and the approach to patients with recurrent HCV infection.

Hepatitis C: a challenge to hepatologists and to the liver transplantation team

Hepatitis C is the main cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and the leading indication of liver transplantation. The aim of this article was to review specific epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic aspects of hepatitis C and their implication for the hepatologists belonging to liver transplantation services. These specific aspects were reviewed in the literature mainly using Medline. Data regarding the epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic aspects of hepatitis C are discussed, with emphasis on their consequences for the liver transplantation team. Hepatitis C is a challenge for hepatologists and for the liver transplantation team. The burden we observe today is the late consequence of infection that occurred in the past. Measures for early recognition of complications of liver disease are recommended. HCV treatment should always be performed before liver transplantation if possible, but if not, HCV recurrence should be recognized and treated early after transplantation.

Management and treatment of hepatitis C viral infection: recommendations from the Department of Veterans Affairs Hepatitis C Resource Center program and the National Hepatitis C Program office

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects approximately 1.3% of the general U.S. population and 5-10% of veterans who use Department of Veterans Affairs medical services. Chronic HCV is clearly linked to the development of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and end-stage liver disease requiring liver transplantation. The consequences of HCV infection constitute a significant disease burden and demonstrate the need for effective medical care. Treatment of chronic HCV is aimed at slowing disease progression, preventing complications of cirrhosis, reducing the risk of HCC, and treating extrahepatic complications of the virus. As part of a comprehensive approach to HCV management, antiviral therapy with peginterferon alfa combined with ribavirin is the current standard of care. Antiviral therapy should be provided to those individuals who meet criteria for treatment and who are at greatest risk for progressive liver disease. Many of these patients may have comorbid medical and psychiatric conditions, which may worsen while on antiviral therapy. Current antiviral regimens are associated with significant adverse effects that can lead to noncompliance, dose reduction, and treatment discontinuation. To overcome these barriers and to address these issues, it has become crucial to facilitate a multidisciplinary team who can respond to and provide HCV-specific care and treatment. Screening for HCV, preventing transmission, delaying disease progression, ensuring appropriate antiviral therapy, and managing treatment-related adverse effects can improve patient quality of life, treatment adherence, and ultimately, improve patient outcomes.

Operational tolerance in clinical liver transplantation: emerging developments

There is still little understanding of the immune events that occur in transplant patients as they develop a relationship with their graft alloantigens. Though, there is an enormous interest and motivation in inducing specific unresponsiveness to organ allografts in order to allow minimization or complete withdrawal of immunosuppression in the recipient, given that life-long immunosuppressive treatment entails a high risk of infectious and metabolic complications, malignancies, and drug-specific toxicity. Clinical tolerance is defined as stable normal graft function in the total absence of a requirement for maintenance immunosuppression. Effective clinical tolerance has been reported more frequently in liver transplant recipients than after transplantation of other organs, as the liver is an immune-privileged organ for several mechanisms, most of which still remain unclear. According to the English medical literature, cautious, carefully supervised weaning of immunosuppressive drugs in controlled trials is not unreasonable, especially when monitored by protocol biopsies. The five centers in which the weaning has been attempted have reported a similar degree of success (1 out of 4 patients) and no harm to the patient over the short-term. Though, long-term follow-up has been lacking and, at present, there are no reliable immunological parameters that enable patients who can be withdrawn from immunosuppressants without the risk of rejection to be identified. To achieve that goal, appropriate collaboration and interaction between clinicians, immunologists and other basic scientists are desirable, as well as the creation of an international, maybe intercontinental, registry for tolerant patients.

Antiviral treatment withdrawal in viremic HCV-positive liver transplant patients: impact on viral loads, allograft function and morphology

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical long-term consequences of antiviral treatment discontinuation in viremic hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

Twenty-five HCV-positive patients after liver transplantation were included in this study. After diagnosing recurrent hepatitis C, a combination therapy with interferon-alpha2b and ribavirin for a minimum of 12 months was initiated. Viremia levels and allograft function were monitored continuously. Allograft biopsies were performed yearly, analyzing grading of inflammation and staging of fibrosis.

RESULTS

HCV recurrence rate was 100%. Up to 114 months post-transplantation, sustained virological response rate was 64%. Treatment discontinuation in virological nonresponders led subsequently to a significant increase of viral loads and deterioration of allograft function (P<0.05) within 1 month. In three patients, a fibrosing cholestatic syndrome developed, resulting in one patient death. Antiviral retherapy was maintained for a mean of 33 months, leading to a significant decline of aminotransferases (P<0.05) as well as decreasing serum levels of bilirubin and HCV-RNA within 6 months. In addition, development of severe allograft fibrosis was prevented despite persistent viral loads.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that antiviral treatment withdrawal carries the risk of severe disease progression in persistently viremic HCV-positive liver transplant patients.

[Management of hepatitis C virus infection in liver transplantation]

Because of graft reinfection and recurrence of the primary disease in the graft, patients who undergo transplantation due to cirrhosis caused by chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have a poorer long-term prognosis than non-HCV-infected transplant recipients. Apart from antiviral therapy, which can occasionally eradicate HCV infection before transplantation, there are no effective measures to prevent graft reinfection. Pre-transplantation antiviral therapy, however, is of limited applicability with currently available drugs. After liver transplantation, 2 options can be used to prevent graft loss due to HCV progression: early treatment in the first 4-6 weeks when there is still no evidence of histological injury and treatment of established HCV infection. Early antiviral therapy is limited not only by its scarce applicability but also by poor tolerability and limited effectiveness (sustained virological response in approximately 20-30% of patients). Treatment of established HCV infection, especially in patients with evidence of disease progression in biopsy, is the most cost-effective alternative with an efficacy of around 35-45% when pegylated interferon combined with ribavirin is used. Adverse effects, such as cytopenia and even induction of rejection, are the main limitation and lead to premature withdrawal in 30% of patients.

Treating hepatitis C infection in liver transplant recipients

Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a growing problem worldwide, with up to 300 million individuals infected, and those with chronic infection are at risk for cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. HCV infection is the most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States and Europe. Unfortunately, although transplantation is effective for treating decompensated cirrhosis and limited hepatocellular carcinoma associated with hepatitis C, HCV reinfection is virtually the rule among transplant recipients. Reinfection of the graft is associated with more rapidly progressive disease, with a median time to cirrhosis of 8 to 10 yr. Unfortunately, treatment of chronic HCV in liver transplant recipients is suboptimal. Combination therapy with interferon (pegylated and nonpegylated forms) plus ribavirin appears to provide maximum benefits. Drug therapy is usually administered for recurrent disease. No prophylactic therapy is available. Preemptive regimens offer no distinctive advantages over treatments begun for recurrent disease. Overall, treatment is poorly tolerated, with frequent need for dose reductions, especially from cytopenias, and drug discontinuations in up to 50% of patients. Optimizing drug doses is important in maximizing sustained virological response rates. Future therapies may include ribavirin alternatives with lower rates of anemia, alternative interferons with lower rates of cytopenias, and new antiviral drugs that can be used alone or in combination with either interferon or ribavirin to enhance sustained virological response rates and improve tolerability. Liver Transpl 12:1192-1204, 2006. (c) 2006 AASLD.

Reduced priority MELD score for hepatocellular carcinoma does not adversely impact candidate survival awaiting liver transplantation

The liver organ allocation policy of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) is based on the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). The policy provides additional priority for candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are awaiting deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). However, this priority was reduced on February 27, 2003 to a MELD of 20 for stage T1 and of 24 for stage T2 HCC. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of reduced priority on HCC candidate survival while on the waiting list. The UNOS database was reviewed for all HCC candidates listed after February 27, 2002, The HCC candidates were grouped into two time periods: MELD 1 (listed between February 27, 2002, and February 26, 2003) and MELD 2 (listed between February 27, 2003 and February 26, 2004). For the two time periods, the national DDLT incidence rates for HCC patients were 1.44 versus 1.53 DDLT per person-year (p = NS) and the waiting times were similar for the two periods (138.0 +/- 196.8 vs. 129.0 +/- 133.8 days; p = NS). Furthermore, the 3-, 6- and 12-month candidate, patient survival and dropout rates were also similar nationally. Regional differences in rates of DDLT for HCC were observed during both MELD periods. Consequently, the reduced MELD score for stage T1 and T2 HCC candidates awaiting DDLT has not had an impact nationally either on their survival on the waiting list or on their ability to obtain a liver transplant within a reasonable time frame. However, regional variations point to the need for reform in how organs are allocated for HCC at the regional level.

Efficacy, predictors of response, and potential risks associated with antiviral therapy in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C

There are unresolved issues regarding sustained virological response (SVR), tolerance and risk of rejection following antiviral therapy in liver transplantation (LT). The aim of our study was to determine efficacy, rejection risk and factors associated with SVR. HCV-infected LT patients with at least 6 months of follow-up following end-of-therapy (EOT) received combination therapy of ribavirin (Rbvr) + standard (n = 31)/pegIFN (n = 36) between 1999 and 2004 (95% genotype 1). An EOT and SVR was obtained in 46% and 33%, respectively. Type of antiviral therapy, use of erythropoietin, compliance, and early virologic response (EVR) were predictive of SVR, but only the latter remained in the multivariate analysis. Premature discontinuation, not impacted by the use of erythropoietin or GCSF, occurred in 40% patients. None of the variables predicted rejection (acute n = 2, chronic n = 4). A SVR occurred in 3/4 patients with chronic rejection. In conclusion, the efficacy of pegIFN-Rbvr is similar to the non-transplant population. An EVR at 3 months is useful to predict lack of response. The type of calcineurin inhibitor and history of prior non-response to IFN before LT do not influence the outcome of therapy. Severe rejection may lead to graft loss, a complication difficult to predict.

Histological recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: Outcome and role of retransplantation

Impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence on long-term outcome after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is highly variable, and the role of retransplantation is still debated. From 1996 to 2003, 131 OLT with histologically proven HCV recurrence and 6 months of follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. One and 5-yr overall survivals were 90.7 and 81.3%, respectively. The mean time of HCV recurrence was 10.1 +/- 6.2 months in patients whose donor's age was less than 70 yr old, and 6.6 +/- 4.7 in patients whose donor's age was more than 70 (P < 0.01). The mean time between OLT and HCV recurrence was 10.7 +/- 8.2 months among patients still alive, and 5 +/- 4.2 among the 20 who died (P = 0.02). In 16 (12.2%) patients, retransplantation was required for severe HCV recurrence; 5 are still alive and 11 (68.7%) died. The mean survival time was 16.2 +/- 6 months if re-OLT was performed within 12 months from first OLT, and it was 45.9 +/- 10 months if re-OLT was performed later (P < 0.01). In conclusion, donors older than 70 yr are at high risk of early HCV recurrence; expectancy of life is significantly reduced in case of histologically proven recurrence within 6 months. Outcome is quite dismal in patients with early HCV recurrence requiring retransplantation within 1 yr of first OLT.

Liver transplantation: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent attention in liver transplantation has focused on equity in organ allocation and management of post-transplant complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Adoption of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) for liver allocation has been successful in implementing a system based on medical urgency rather than waiting time. Refinements are being studied in reducing geographic disparities and improving transplant benefit by balancing pre-transplant mortality and post-transplant survival. With hepatocellular carcinoma becoming a bigger proportion of liver transplants since MELD, emerging literature is examining expansion of the current criteria for transplantation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatitis C virus infection is associated with worse patient and graft survival post-transplantation than other liver diseases. The optimal timing and delivery of current antiviral therapy and immunosuppressive strategies in reducing the severity of hepatitis C virus recurrence post-transplantation are discussed. Chronic renal dysfunction after liver transplantation is a source of considerable morbidity. Nephron-sparing immunosuppression regimens are emerging with encouraging results.

SUMMARY

Organ allocation tends to evolve under MELD with a focus on reducing geographic disparities and maximizing transplant benefit. Hepatitis C virus, hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic renal dysfunction are a major challenge and continued research in these areas will undoubtedly lead to better outcomes for transplant recipients.

Management of hepatitis C in the setting of liver transplantation

Each year, 5000 to 6000 liver transplantations are performed in the United States, 40% of which are for hepatitis C-related end-stage liver disease. Infection of liver allograft is universal and is associated with an accelerated rate of disease progression. Unfortunately, antiviral therapy after transplantation is less effective and often is beset with complications. This article reviews antiviral therapies and the factors that may influence the response in patients who have HCV infection both immediately before and after liver transplantation.

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatitis C-related cirrhosis: no difference in histological recurrence when compared to deceased donor liver transplantation recipients

The question of possible earlier and more aggressive recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) remains unanswered. To address this issue we retrospectively reviewed virological, histological, and clinical data in 67 patients (52 DDLT and 15 LDLT) who underwent liver transplant for their HCV-related cirrhosis since April 2001. Our data indicate that there is no statistical difference between LDLT and DDLT groups in mean age, Child-Turcotte-Pugh score, model for end-stage liver disease score, and gender distribution. The mean follow-up was 749 +/- 371 days in LDLT and 692 +/- 347 days in DDLT. The predominant genotype in the LDLT and DDLT are genotype 1 (LDLT, 91%; DDLT, 70%). All patients with histologically confirmed recurrent HCV had detectable HCV-RNA in serum. The histological recurrence rate of hepatitis C was 58% at 4 months, 90% at 1 year, and 100% at 2 years in LDLT patients vs. 71% at 4 months, 94% at 1 year, and 95% at 2 years in DDLT patients (not significant) Comparison of the activity of inflammation and fibrosis score at all time points failed to show a statistical difference. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed similar patient and graft survival rates between the 2 groups. Our data indicate that histological recurrence of HCV is an early event and virtually universal 2 years' posttransplantation, regardless of modality of donor procurement.

Significant improvement in the outcome of HCV-infected transplant recipients by avoiding rapid steroid tapering and potent induction immunosuppression

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

Recurrent HCV-cirrhosis occurs in a substantial proportion of transplant recipients, with higher rates reported in patients who had recently received a transplant. Over-immunosuppression has been implicated in this more unfavorable outcome. To determine whether the implementation of specific measures aimed at reducing or avoiding negative predictive variables is associated with an improvement in the outcome of recurrent hepatitis C.

METHODS

Comparative study between a cohort of patients who had recently received a transplant (2001-2004) and a historical group of HCV-infected patients transplanted before the implementation of two simple measures (1999-2000): (i) use of dual initial immunosuppression (steroids + cyclosporine neoral or tacrolimus); (ii) slow steroid tapering (>6 months). Yearly biopsies were performed in these recipients, and only those with at least one protocol biopsy and those with cholestatic hepatitis (regardless of follow-up) were included in the study. End-point: rate of HCV-related severe disease (defined as bridging fibrosis, cirrhosis or fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis) within the first year post-transplantation.

RESULTS

Severe disease was significantly lower in this cohort compared to the historical group (26/90, 29% vs 25/52, 48%; p=0.02). While other factors remained unchanged between the two cohorts, the proportion of patients on triple-quadruple regimes and the number of boluses of methyl-prednisolone were lower and the duration of prednisone therapy longer in more patients who had recently received a transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

Improving the outcome of recurrent hepatitis C may be achieved by reducing overall immunosuppression and avoiding abrupt variations in immunosuppression.

Complete weaning off immunosuppression in HCV liver transplant recipients is feasible and favourably impacts on the progression of disease recurrence

BACKGROUND/AIMS

HCV-related disease recurrence progresses rapidly after liver transplantation. We hypothesised that withdrawal of immunosuppression might favourably impact on disease progression.

METHODS

Weaning off immunosuppression was attempted in 34 HCV-RNA positive patients (mean age 62+/-6.4 years) transplanted 63.5+/-20.1 months earlier, under cyclosporine A monotherapy. Patients were followed for 3 years including yearly protocol liver biopsies. Primary endpoints were feasibility of weaning off immunosuppression and its impact on disease progression. Secondary endpoint was to identify predictors of an immunosuppression-free state and fibrosis progression.

RESULTS

Complete and permanent immunosuppression withdrawal was achieved in 8 patients (23.4%), whereas 14 (41.2%) developed rejection within eight months despite an initial response and 12 (35.2%) rejected during tapering. After a mean follow-up 45.5+/-5.8 months weaned patients showed stabilisation/improvement of histological fibrosis (P<0.01), lower necro-inflammation (P<0.02) and improved liver function (P<0.05) compared to weaning-intolerants. Multiple logistic regression identified low blood cyclosporine A trough levels during the first post-transplant week (P=0.004) and initial steroid-free immunosuppression (P<0.008) as independent predictors of sustained weaning. Achievement of immunosoppression freedom (P=0.02) and baseline staging score (P<0.0001) were independently associated with stabilisation/improvement of histological fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstitution of immune-competence in the host improves the natural history of HCV recurrence in the graft.

Protocol liver biopsies in long-term management of patients transplanted for hepatitis B-related liver disease

AIM: To evaluate the long-term histological outcome of patients transplanted for HBV-related liver disease and given HBIg prophylaxis indefinitely after LT.

METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients transplanted for hepatitis B were prospectively studied. HBsAg, HBV-DNA and liver function tests were evaluated in the serum 3, 6 and 12 mo after LT and then yearly. LB was obtained 6 and 12 mo after LT and yearly thereafter. Chronic hepatitis (CH) B after LT was classified as minimal, mild, moderate or severe.

RESULTS: HBV recurred in 7/42 (16.6 %) patients after 6-96 mo of follow-up. A hundred and eighty-seven LB were evaluated. Four of 7 patients with graft reinfection, all with unknown HBV DNA status before LT, developed cirrhosis at 12-36 mo of follow-up. Of the 122 LB obtained from 28 HBsAg+/HCV- recipients with no HBV recurrence after LT, all biopsies were completely normal in only 2 patients (7.1 %), minimal/non-specific changes were observed in 18 (64.2 %), and at least 1 biopsy showed CH in the remaining 8 (28.5 %). Twenty-nine LB obtained from 7 patients transplanted for HBV-HCV cirrhosis and remaining HBsAg- after LT revealed recurrent CH-C. Actuarial survival was similar in patients with HBsAg+ or HBsAg- liver diseases.

CONCLUSION: Though protocol biopsies may enable the detection of graft dysfunction at an early stage, the risk of progression and the clinical significance of these findings remains to be determined.

Pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) is often treated with interferon and ribavirin combination therapy but results have been disappointing. Given the promising results reported with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for hepatitis C, this combination is now preferred for the treatment of recurrent HCV. This article reports a transplantation program's experience with antiviral therapy treatment for liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV.

METHODS

Between October 2002 and June 2004, patients with recurrent HCV were screened to determine if they were eligible for treatment. Liver function tests, HCVRNA, and liver biopsies were done on all patients prior to treatment. HCVRNA was repeated at 3 months, end of treatment (EOT), and 6 months after EOT for patients HCVRNA-negative at EOT. Patients were prospectively followed up after starting weekly pegylated interferon alfa-2a 180 mcg/wk and ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/d (Roche, Nutley, NJ, United States) with folic acid 1 mg/d.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were eligible for treatment with a median age of 49.2 years. Twenty-one patients have completed treatment, 6 remain on treatment, and 5 were intolerant. In an intention-to-treat analysis, sustained HCVRNA eradication occurred in at least 40.6% of patients. Side effects led to treatment withdrawal in 5 patients (15.6%).

CONCLUSION

Pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin appear promising for the treatment of recurrent HCV. Side effects were an infrequent cause of treatment discontinuation, unlike previous combinations of interferon-based therapy. Randomized, prospective trials incorporating serial liver biopsies with appropriate quality of life analyses are required to manage this silent epidemic.

Management of Recurrent Hepatitis C in Liver Transplant Recipients

Recurrent HCV infection is universal in liver transplant recipients who are viremic pretransplant. The rate of histologic disease progression after transplantation is more rapid, and the risk of cirrhosis by 5 to 10 years is about 30%. Several donor, recipient, and viral factors have been associated with worse post-transplant outcomes in recipients with recurrent hepatitis C. Whether or not HCV-infected recipients of live donor grafts have worse out-comes compared with deceased donor graft recipients is controversial. To maximize the long-term survival of recipients with HCV infection, eradication of infection is the ultimate goal. Treatment of recurrent HCV after liver transplantation can be undertaken at several different time points: (1) prophylactically, at the time of transplantation; (2) pre-emptively, in the early post-transplant period; and (3) after established recurrent histologic disease is present. Prophylactic therapy for HCV infection has no established role at present, but studies are ongoing. Preemptive therapy using IFN and RBV has resulted in variable SVR rates (9%-43%) and is generally poorly tolerated, especially if the patient has advanced liver disease pretransplantation. Treatment of established recurrent HCV disease with combination PEGIFN and RBV is associated with a SVR in about 30% to 35% of patients overall but is limited by high rates of dose reduction or drug discontinuation. In conclusion, successful HCV eradication in the post-transplant setting is difficult with current treatment options, but it is possible. Determination of the optimal doses of antiviral drugs in transplant patients and improvements in drug tolerability may be important first steps in achieving enhanced response rates. There is a need for new drugs in this population that have greater efficacy and a better safety profile.

Management of hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients

Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease is the leading cause of graft loss in liver transplant recipients with pre-transplant HCV infection. While natural history is variable, median time to recurrent cirrhosis is less than a decade. Factors contributing to risk of recurrence and rate of fibrosis progression are only partially known. Older donor age, treatment of acute rejection, cytomegalovirus infection and high pre-transplant viral load are most consistently linked with worse outcomes. Whether these factors can be modified to positively impact on HCV disease progression is unknown. The main therapeutic approach for patients with recurrent HCV disease has been the treatment with interferon and ribavirin (RBV) once recurrent disease is documented or progressive. Efficacy is lower than in nontransplant patients and tolerability, especially of RBV, is a major limitation. Stable or improved fibrosis scores are seen in the majority of sustained responders. Optimal dose, duration and timing of treatment have not been determined. Alternative strategies under study include pre-transplant treatment of decompensated cirrhotics, preemptive antiviral therapy started within weeks of transplantation and prophylactic therapy using HCV antibodies. Ongoing studies may establish a future role for alternative treatment approaches. Additionally, limited overall efficacy of interferon-based therapy in the transplant setting highlights the urgent need for new drug therapies.

HLA-DRB1 donor-recipient mismatch affects the outcome of hepatitis C disease recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

This study extends our previously reported observations that various immunological factors are associated with the occurrence of histologically proven recurrent hepatitis C. The two specific issues investigated were to confirm the associations of MHC alleles and donor/recipient mismatch with the occurrence of recurrent hepatitis C in an independent cohort of newly transplanted patients and to look for immunologic and nonimmunologic variables affecting the severity of the recurrent disease.

METHODS

Two separate cohorts of consecutive patients were studied: a look-back cohort (LC) of 120 patients and a cohort for studying the disease progression (CSDP) of 190 patients. Protocol liver biopsies were obtained at least 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 years after liver transplantation (LT).

RESULTS

A fully mismatched donor/recipient pair at the DRB1 locus was confirmed to be associated with both the recurrence of histologic hepatitis in the LC (59% vs 23%, P = .0002) and its progression beyond stage 3 in the CSPD (71.4% vs 39.3%, P = .0003). Relevant immunologic and nonimmunologic variables were included into a multivariate Cox proportional model and three variables, namely, donor age, full HLA-DRB1 donor-recipient mismatch, and HLA B14, resulted in independent risk factors for the development of severe fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that DRB1 donor-recipient mismatch affects both the occurrence and progression of recurrent hepatitis C disease. This information is clinically relevant as it may help to better allocate organs and to recognize patients at risk for progression so that specific interventions can be implemented.

Management of hepatitis C-infected liver transplant recipients at large North American centres: changes in recent years

Large (>or=45 transplants per year) North American liver transplant centres were surveyed regarding management of hepatitis C virus (HCV). A total of 25/41 (59%) and 28/48 (58%) of centres responded to the surveys in 1998 and 2003, respectively, with 17 centres participating in both surveys. HCV was the most common indication for transplantation. Use of protocol liver biopsies was higher in 2003 and 60% used them to monitor HCV disease. Fewer centres reported modifying primary immunosuppression (IMS) for HCV-positive (vs. non-HCV) patients in 2003 (26%) vs. 1998 (56%). IMS was most frequently tacrolimus-based, but mycophenolate mofetil use increased in 2003 (52% vs. 23% in 1998). In both years, approximately 40% treated allograft rejection differently in HCV-positive recipients, with less use of OKT3 in 2003. Combination anti-HCV therapy for 12 months or more was the treatment of choice and growth factor use was common (68%). HCV-positive recipients were considered candidates for retransplantation but HCV-specific criteria were used in decision-making. Practice of centres changed over time with an increase in HCV transplantation and use of protocol liver biopsies, and a trend towards lesser modification of IMS in HCV-positive recipients. We conclude that there is considerable variability in the management of HCV among transplant programs and over time.

Corticosteroid-Free Strategies in Liver Transplantation

Corticosteroid avoidance is feasible and may be desirable in liver transplantation. Approximately 50% of liver transplant recipients who use calcineurin inhibitors and azathioprine do not need corticosteroids. The availability of newer agents, such as mycophenolate mofetil and antibody therapy, has increased the percentage of patients who do not need to use corticosteroids to about 75%. The feasibility of corticosteroid-free immunosuppression has been established by controlled trials demonstrating non-inferiority with respect to patterns of rejection as well as patient and graft survival. However, the evidence available to date does not unequivocally establish the benefits of corticosteroid-free immunosuppression, although some advantage has been established relating to post-transplant diabetes mellitus, cytomegalovirus infection and growth patterns in children. The effect of corticosteroid-free immunosuppression in hepatitis C liver transplant recipients is yet to be resolved.

Management of HCV infection and liver transplantation

A major challenge facing liver transplant recipients and their physicians is recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection following otherwise technically successful liver transplantation. Recurrent infection leads to diminished graft and patient survival. Although a number or predictors of severe recurrence have been identified, no definitive strategy has been developed to prevent recurrence. Generally the tempo of hepatitis C recurrence is gauged by serial liver biopsies with the decision to intervene with antiviral therapy based on local philosophy and expertise. Treating hepatitis C in this population has a number of major challenges including diminished patient tolerance for side-effects as well as managing the patient's immunesuppression. However sustained viral responses are possible with the potential to reduce the impact of recurrent hepatitis on the graft. However recurrent hepatitis C virus infection will remain the most frequent form of recurrent disease in liver transplant programs for the foreseeable future.

Antiviral therapy of HCV in the cirrhotic and transplant candidate

Despite the improved efficacy of peginterferons, the rate of sustained virologic response is suboptimal in cirrhotic patients, relative to non-cirrhotic patients. However, the treatment of patients with compensated cirrhosis has recently been encouraged by expert panels. Interferon-based therapy may provide additional benefit by reducing the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients as suggested in preliminary studies. Results of two ongoing prospective studies are awaited to answer the important question of the effectiveness of suppressive interferon therapy, even in the absence of sustained virologic response. Given the importance of recurrent HCV following liver transplantation, attention has been directed toward the antiviral treatment of patients with advanced liver disease. This approach needs to be pursued with caution given the potential morbidity of the therapy. Recently, a low accelerating dosage regimen has provided excellent results and is the subject of additional inquiry.

Malignancy after transplantation

As newer immunosuppressive regimens have steadily reduced the incidence of acute rejection and have extended the life expectancy of allograft recipients, posttransplant malignancy has become an important cause of mortality. In fact, it is expected that cancer will surpass cardiovascular complications as the leading cause of death in transplant patients within the next 2 decades. An understanding of the underlying pathobiology and how to minimize cancer risks in transplant recipients are essential. The etiology of posttransplant malignancy is believed to be multifactorial and likely involves impaired immunosurveillance of neoplastic cells as well as depressed antiviral immune activity with a number of common posttransplant malignancies being viral-related. Although calcineurin inhibitors and azathioprine have been linked with posttransplant malignancies, newer agents such as mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus have not and indeed may have antitumor properties. Long-term data are needed to determine if the use of these agents will ultimately lower the mortality due to malignancy for transplant recipients.

Recurrent hepatitis C after retransplantation: factors affecting graft and patient outcome

Retransplantation (re-LT) of patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) carries significant morbidity and mortality, negatively impacting on an already scarce donor allograft pool. In this study, we investigated the outcome of allografts and patients after re-LT due to recurrent HCV. Between 1989 and 2002, 47 patients were retransplanted at our institution due to HCV-related graft failure. Clinical HCV recurrence after re-LT was diagnosed when patients had acute liver enzyme elevation correlated with histological recurrence. The independent influence of these variables on survival was tested using Cox regression model. Chi-squared tests were used to examine the influence of individual demographic and pre/perioperative variables on recurrence. Thirty-one (66%) patients died after re-LT (median 2.2 months). Donor age >60, clinical HCV recurrence, and graft failure due to cirrhosis were significant risk factors for mortality (risk ratios of 3.6, 3.3, and 2.4, respectively). Pre-LT MELD score was lower among survivors (22+/- 5 vs. 27+/- 8). Following re-LT, 38 patients had at least one biopsy due to acute liver dysfunction; 19 of them (50%) had recurrence within the first 3 months. High-dose solumedrol was correlated with early recurrence. No association was found between time of recurrence after the first LT and time of recurrence after re-LT. In conclusion, patients with cirrhosis due to recurrent HCV undergoing re-LT have an extremely high mortality rate; older allografts should be avoided in retransplanting these patients. The timing of clinical recurrence after initial liver transplantation is not predictive of the timing of recurrence after re-LT. Patients experiencing early graft failure due to accelerated forms of HCV should not be denied re-LT with the expectation that a similar disease course will occur after re-LT.

Orthotopic liver transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients: outcome of 7 patients from the Bonn cohort

The outcome and clinical features of 7 HIV-positive patients who were liver transplanted at Bonn University in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) between 1997 and 2004, analyzed by retrospective chart review, are reported. Reasons for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) were end-stage liver disease due to chronic hepatitis C (n = 4) or hepatitis B (n = 1) or acute liver failure due to fulminant hepatitis B (n = 2). Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine A and prednisone. HAART was reinitiated 1 month after transplantation, and immunosuppression was carefully adapted to account for drug-drug interactions between cyclosporine A and protease inihibitors. Prednisone was withdrawn 5 months (median) after OLT when immunosuppression had been reliably established in the presence of HAART. One patient died 95 days after OLT due intrathoracic hemorrhage, whereas 6 patients were alive at a median of 24 months. A single episode of acute rejection was observed. The spectrum of postoperative complications was no different from HIV-negative patients apart from Kaposi's sarcoma and multicentric Castleman's disease in a single patient. Recurrent hepatitis B infection was efficiently prevented, whereas hepatitis C reinfection occurred in all 4 patients who had preexisting hepatitis C. Earlier reports on fatal courses of recurrent hepatitis C infection, high rates of organ rejection, and HAART-related liver toxicity were not observed in our patients. In conclusion, even though preliminary, our data suggest that outcomes after liver transplantation of HIV-infected patients can be improved.