Isolation of a cDNA for HSF2: evidence for two heat shock factor genes in humans

Emerging role of heat shock proteins in biology and medicine

All cells, procaryotic and eucaryotic, respond to an elevation in temperature by increasing the synthesis of a family of proteins collectively known as heat shock proteins (HSPs). HSPs are among the most highly conserved and abundant proteins in nature. Studies on the regulation of the synthesis of HSPs have for several years shed light on the mechanisms regulating gene expression. The results from recent years, showing that HSPs play crucial roles in a wide variety of normal cellular processes, has made them an object of even broader interest, first to molecular and cellular biologists and later to specialists in various fields of medicine including oncology, immunology, infectious disease, autoimmunity, embryology, neurology and endocrinology. The aim of this review is to briefly summarize our present knowledge of the regulation of the heat shock response and the structure of the relevant gene products, HSPs. Moreover, some of the exciting associations between HSPs and various fields of medicine will be discussed.

Heat Shock Proteins in Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury: A Perspective

There is much to suggest that the induction of heat shock protein synthesis is an important response to injury and stress in the brain. The role of heat shock proteins in neurological disease has been approached from two points-of-view. First, the induction and synthesis of specific proteins after brain cell injury provide a window through which insight on the regulation of gene expression in pathological tissue can be obtained. These studies have broad implications for understanding pathophysiological mechanisms of disease. Second, putative cell protective effects of heat shock proteins in brain tissue provide insight into biochemical mechanisms of selective neuronal vulnerability. These studies have extremely important clinical implications since cell sensitivity to injury can seemingly be modified. The role of heat shock proteins in hypoxic-ischemic brain injury is discussed forthwith.

Induction of HSP70 gene expression by the antiproliferative prostaglandin PGA2: a growth-dependent response mediated by activation of heat shock transcription factor

Prostaglandins (PG) of the A series are potent inhibitors of cell proliferation. Recently, it was shown that PGA2-induced growth arrest was associated with the increased synthesis of stress proteins encoded by the HSP70 gene family. In this study, we have examined the molecular basis for this increases HSP70 expression. Northern (RNA) blot analysis and nuclear run-on assays demonstrated that induction of high levels of HSP70 mRNA results from an increase in the rate of transcription. High-level induction is specific to the HSP70 family of heat shock proteins and is rapid, reversible, dose dependent, and specific for PGs capable of growth-arresting HeLa cells. In addition, the response was found to be highly dependent on the growth state of the cells, as induction occurs in growing but not in confluent nongrowing cell populations. Induction is dependent on the activation of heat shock factor. Cycloheximide pretreatment, which inhibits the antiproliferative effects of PGA2, prevents activation of the heat shock factor and induction of HSP70 mRNA by PGA2. These results support a role for HSP70 in mediating the antiproliferative effects of PGA2.

Induction of HSP70 gene expression by the antiproliferative prostaglandin PGA2: a growth-dependent response mediated by activation of heat shock transcription factor

Prostaglandins (PG) of the A series are potent inhibitors of cell proliferation. Recently, it was shown that PGA2-induced growth arrest was associated with the increased synthesis of stress proteins encoded by the HSP70 gene family. In this study, we have examined the molecular basis for this increases HSP70 expression. Northern (RNA) blot analysis and nuclear run-on assays demonstrated that induction of high levels of HSP70 mRNA results from an increase in the rate of transcription. High-level induction is specific to the HSP70 family of heat shock proteins and is rapid, reversible, dose dependent, and specific for PGs capable of growth-arresting HeLa cells. In addition, the response was found to be highly dependent on the growth state of the cells, as induction occurs in growing but not in confluent nongrowing cell populations. Induction is dependent on the activation of heat shock factor. Cycloheximide pretreatment, which inhibits the antiproliferative effects of PGA2, prevents activation of the heat shock factor and induction of HSP70 mRNA by PGA2. These results support a role for HSP70 in mediating the antiproliferative effects of PGA2.

Stress-induced oligomerization and chromosomal relocalization of heat-shock factor

The induction of heat-shock transcription factor (HSF) binding to DNA is accomplished by a heat-induced oligomerization. The transition to the induced state is accompanied by a chromosomal redistribution of HSF to the heat-shock puff sites. Over 150 additional chromosomal sites also accumulate HSF, including developmental loci that are repressed during heat shock. These findings suggest an unforeseen role for HSF as a repressor of normal gene activity during heat stress.

Cloning and characterization of two mouse heat shock factors with distinct inducible and constitutive DNA-binding ability

We have cloned two distinct mouse heat shock transcription factor genes, mHSF1 and mHSF2. The mHSF1 and mHSF2 open reading frames are similar in size, containing 503 and 517 amino acids, respectively. Although mHSF1 and mHSF2 are quite divergent overall (only 38% identity), they display extensive homology in the DNA-binding and oligomerization domains that are conserved in the heat shock factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Kluyveromyces lactis, Drosophila, tomato, and human. The ability of these two mouse heat shock factors to bind to the heat shock element (HSE) is regulated by heat. mHSF1 is expressed in an in vitro translation system in an inactive form that is activated to DNA binding by incubation at temperatures greater than 41 degrees C, the same temperatures that activate heat shock factor DNA binding and the stress response in mouse cells in vivo. mHSF2, on the other hand, is expressed in a form that binds DNA constitutively but loses DNA binding by incubation at greater than 41 degrees C. Both mHSF1 and mHSF2 are encoded by single-copy genes, and neither is transcriptionally regulated by heat shock. However, there is a striking difference in the levels of mHSF1 mRNA in different tissues of the mouse.

Molecular cloning and expression of a human heat shock factor, HSF1

Human cells respond to heat stress by inducing the binding of a preexisting transcriptional activator (heat shock factor, HSF) to DNA. We have isolated recombinant DNA clones for a human HSF (HSF1) by screening cDNA libraries with a human cDNA fragment. The human HSF1 probe was produced by the PCR with primers deduced from conserved amino acids in the Drosophila and yeast HSF sequences. The human HSF1 mRNA is constitutively expressed in HeLa cells under nonshock conditions and encodes a protein with four conserved leucine zipper motifs. Like its counterpart in Drosophila, human HSF1 produced in Escherichia coli in the absence of heat shock is active as a DNA binding transcription factor, suggesting that the intrinsic activity of HSF is under negative control in human cells. Surprisingly, an independently isolated human HSF clone, HSF2, is related to but significantly different from HSF1 [Schuetz, T. J., Gallo, G. J., Sheldon, L., Tempst, P. & Kingston, R. E. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 6911-6915].

Facilitated binding of GAL4 and heat shock factor to nucleosomal templates: differential function of DNA-binding domains

Regulatory factors must contend with chromatin structure to function. Although nucleosome structure and position on promoters can be important in determining factor access, the intrinsic ability of factors to bind to nucleosomal DNA might also play an essential regulatory role. We have used templates where nucleosomes were either randomly positioned or rotationally phased to demonstrate that two transcription factors, heat shock factor (HSF) and GAL4, differ significantly in their ability to bind to nucleosomes. GAL4 was able to bind to nucleosomal templates. Surprisingly, in contrast to its behavior on naked DNA, GAL4 bound better to multiple GAL4 sites than to a single GAL4 site on these templates. HSF alone was not able to bind to nucleosomal templates. HSF was able to bind to nucleosomal templates, however, when the TATA-binding factor TFIID was present. Consequently, binding to nucleosomal templates could be facilitated by adjacent binding of the same protein in the case of GAL4 but required binding of a second protein in the case of HSF. Taken together, these data demonstrate that regulatory factors differ in their inherent ability to bind to nucleosomal templates. These differences are likely to be important to the function of these factors in vivo.