DNA methylation patterns in hereditary human cancers mimic sporadic tumorigenesis

A CpG island hypermethylation profile of primary colorectal carcinomas and colon cancer cell lines

Background

Tumor cell lines are commonly used as experimental tools in cancer research, but their relevance for the in vivo situation is debated. In a series of 11 microsatellite stable (MSS) and 9 microsatellite unstable (MSI) colon cancer cell lines and primary colon carcinomas (25 MSS and 28 MSI) with known ploidy stem line and APC, KRAS, and TP53 mutation status, we analyzed the promoter methylation of the following genes: hMLH1, MGMT, p16^INK4a (CDKN2A α-transcript), p14^ARF (CDKN2A β-transcript), APC, and E-cadherin (CDH1). We compared the DNA methylation profiles of the cell lines with those of the primary tumors. Finally, we examined if the epigenetic changes were associated with known genetic markers and/or clinicopathological variables.

Results

The cell lines and primary tumors generally showed similar overall distribution and frequencies of gene methylation. Among the cell lines, 15%, 50%, 75%, 65%, 20% and 15% showed promoter methylation for hMLH1, MGMT, p16^INK4a, p14^ARF, APC, and E-cadherin, respectively, whereas 21%, 40%, 32%, 38%, 32%, and 40% of the primary tumors were methylated for the same genes. hMLH1 and p14^ARF were significantly more often methylated in MSI than in MSS primary tumors, whereas the remaining four genes showed similar methylation frequencies in the two groups. Methylation of p14^ARF, which indirectly inactivates TP53, was seen more frequently in tumors with normal TP53 than in mutated samples, but the difference was not statistically significant. Methylation of p14^ARF and p16^INK4a was often present in the same primary tumors, but association to diploidy, MSI, right-sided location and female gender was only significant for p14^ARF. E-cadherin was methylated in 14/34 tumors with altered APC further stimulating WNT signaling.

Conclusions

The present study shows that colon cancer cell lines are in general relevant in vitro models, comparable with the in vivo situation, as the cell lines display many of the same molecular alterations as do the primary carcinomas. The combined pattern of epigenetic and genetic aberrations in the primary carcinomas reveals associations between them as well as to clinicopathological variables, and may aid in the future molecular assisted classification of clinically distinct stages.

Loss of heterozygosity at BRCA2 in a ductal carcinoma in situ and three invasive breast carcinomas in a family with a germline BRCA2 mutation

We have examined a family with a germline BRCA2 mutation in three cases of invasive breast cancer and one case of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) has been demonstrated at the BRCA2 locus in all cases. This result may suggest that the germline mutation in BRCA2 is the initiating step of DCIS and support the theory that DCIS is a precursor of invasive breast carcinoma in hereditary breast cancer.

DNA methylation and breast cancer

DNA methylation and chromatin structure patterns are tightly linked components of the epigenome, which regulate gene expression programming. Two contradictory changes in DNA methylation patterns are observed in breast cancer; regional hypermethylation of specific genes and global hypomethylation. It is proposed here that independent mechanisms are responsible for these alterations in DNA methylation patterns and that these alterations deregulate two different processes in breast cancer. Regional hypermethylation is brought about by specific regional changes in chromatin structure, whereas global demethylation is caused by a general increase in demethylation activity. Hypermethylation silences growth regulatory genes resulting in uncontrolled growth whereas hypomethylation leads to activation of genes required for metastasis. DNA methylation inhibitors activate silenced tumor suppressor genes resulting in arrest of tumor growth and are now being tested as candidate anticancer drugs. Demethylation inhibitors are proposed here to be potential novel candidate antimetastatic agents, which would bring about methylation and silencing of metastatic genes. Future therapeutic application of either methylation or demethylation inhibitors in cancer therapy would require understanding of the relative role of these processes in the evolution of cancer.

Methylation profiles of thirty four promoter-CpG islands and concordant methylation behaviours of sixteen genes that may contribute to carcinogenesis of astrocytoma

Background

Astrocytoma is a common aggressive intracranial tumor and presents a formidable challenge in the clinic. Association of altered DNA methylation patterns of the promoter CpG islands with the expression profile of cancer-related genes, has been found in many human tumors. Therefore, DNA methylation status as such may serve as an epigenetic biomarker for both diagnosis and prognosis of human tumors, including astrocytoma.

Methods

We used the methylation specific PCR in conjunction with sequencing verification to establish the methylation profile of the promoter CpG island of thirty four genes in astrocytoma tissues from fifty three patients (The WHO grading:. I: 14, II: 15, III: 12 and IV: 12 cases, respectively). In addition, compatible tissues (normal tissues distant from lesion) from three non-astrocytoma patients were included as the control.

Results

Seventeen genes (ABL, APC, APAF1, BRCA1, CSPG2, DAPK1, hMLH1, LKB1, PTEN, p14^ARF, p15^INK4b, p27^KIP1, p57^KIP2, RASSF1C, RB1, SURVIVIN, and VHL) displayed a uniformly unmethylated pattern in all the astrocytoma and non-astrocytoma tissues examined. However, the MAGEA1 gene that was inactivated and hypermethylated in non-astrocytoma tissues, was partially demethylated in 24.5% of the astrocytoma tissues (co-existence of the hypermethylated and demethylated alleles). Of the astrocytoma associated hypermethylated genes, the methylation pattern of the CDH13, cyclin a1, DBCCR1, EPO, MYOD1, and p16^INK4a genes changed in no more than 5.66% (3/53) of astrocytoma tissues compared to non-astrocytoma controls, while the RASSF1A, p73, AR, MGMT, CDH1, OCT6,, MT1A, WT1, and IRF7 genes were more frequently hypermethylated in 69.8%, 47.2%, 41.5%, 35.8%, 32%, 30.2%, 30.2%, 30.2% and 26.4% of astrocytoma tissues, respectively. Demethylation mediated inducible expression of the CDH13, MAGEA1, MGMT, p73 and RASSF1A genes was established in an astrocytoma cell line (U251), demonstrating that expression of these genes is likely regulated by DNA methylation. AR gene hypermethylation was found exclusively in female patients (22/27, 81%, 0/26, 0%, P < 0.001), while the IRF7 gene hypermethylation preferentially occurred in the male counterparts (11/26, 42.3% to 3/27, 11%, P < 0.05). Applying the mathematic method "the Discovery of Association Rules", we have identified groups consisting of up to three genes that more likely display the altered methylation patterns in concert in astrocytoma.

Conclusions

Of the thirty four genes examined, sixteen genes exhibited astrocytoma associated changes in the methylation profile. In addition to the possible pathological significance, the established concordant methylation profiles of the subsets consisting of two to three target genes may provide useful clues to the development of the useful prognostic as well as diagnostic assays for astrocytoma.

Multigene methylation analysis of gastrointestinal tumors: TPEF emerges as a frequent tumor-specific aberrantly methylated marker that can be detected in peripheral blood

BACKGROUND

Gene promoter methylation is a mechanism for tumor suppressor gene silencing and inactivation. The development of highly sensitive methods for revealing aberrant cancer-associated DNA methylation allows the identification of tumor markers not only in tumor samples, but also in body fluid, an approach that can be useful in the early detection of neoplasms.

METHODS

We analyzed the methylation status at 16 loci in tumor samples of the gastrointestinal tract and in early or pre-neoplastic lesions of the colon.

RESULTS

Tumor samples revealed that methylation at the transmembrane protein containing epidermal growth factor and follistatin domains (TPEF) locus had the best ratio of discrimination between tumor samples versus normal tissues (83 versus 0%). Its combination with hypermethylated in cancer 1 (HIC1), death-associated protein kinase (DAPK) and O-6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), allowed the detection of aberrant methylation in 98% of colorectal carcinomas and 100% of gastric carcinomas. The same alterations were also detected in colon adenomas and tissues surrounding the adenomas, indicating that hypermethylation at these loci occurred early in tumor progression. Analysis of DNA from peripheral blood revealed that TPEF methylation was detectable in colorectal tumor patients and patients with early or pre-neoplastic lesions, but not in healthy volunteers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results identify TPEF as a tumor marker that could be useful in the follow-up of gastrointestinal cancer patients or the screening of individuals at risk of developing gastrointestinal neoplasms.

Methylation profiling of twenty four genes and the concordant methylation behaviours of nineteen genes that may contribute to hepatocellular carcinogenesis

To determine the possible role of the epigenetic mechanisms in carcinogenesis of the hepatocellular carcinoma, we methylation-profiled the promoter CpG islands of twenty four genes both in HCC tumors and the neighboring non-cancerous tissues of twenty eight patients using the methylation-specific PCR (MSP) method in conjunction with the DNA sequencing. In comparison with the normal liver tissues from the healthy donors, it was found that while remained unmethylated the ABL, CAV, EPO, GATA3, LKB1, NEP, NFL, NIS and p27KIP1 genes, varying extents of the HCC specific hypermethylation were found associated with the ABO, AR, CSPG2, cyclin a1, DBCCR1, GALR2, IRF7, MGMT, MT1A, MYOD1, OCT6, p57KIP2, p73, WT1 genes, and demethylation with the MAGEA1 gene, respectively. Judged by whether the hypermethylated occurred in HCC more frequently than in their neighboring normal tissues, the hypermethylation status of the AR, DBCCR1, IRF7, OCT6, and p73 genes was considered as the event specific to the late stage, while that the rest that lacked such a distinguished contrast, as the event specific to the early stage of HCC carcinogenesis. Among all the clinical pathological parameters tested for the association with, the hypermethylation of the cyclin a1 gene was more prevalent in the non-cirrhosis group (P=0.021) while the hypermethylated p16INK4a gene was more common in the cirrhosis group (P=0.017). The concordant methylation behaviors of nineteen genes, including the four previously studied and their association with cirrhosis has been evaluated by the best subgroup selection method. The data presented in this report would enable us to shape our understanding of the mechanisms for the HCC specific loss of the epigenetic stability of the genome, as well as the strategy of developing the novel robust methylation based diagnostic and prognostic tools.

Circulating methylated DNA

Early detection of cancer would facilitate better management of patients, because survival is greatly affected by stage of presentation. Circulating nucleic acids represent a biomarker that might be used in the early detection of cancer. In addition, such biomarkers could potentially be used to follow the progression of patients with cancer. DNA methylation of the promoter region CpG islands of genes represents one such nucleic acid-based marker, and possesses some advantages over other approaches. These include the stability of DNA as a molecule, the ability to detect such changes using simple polymerase chain reaction-based approaches, and the potential for methylated DNA to be preferentially present in nucleosomes in plasma or serum. These factors are presented and their impact on the detection of methylated DNA circulating in the bloodstream is demonstrated.

Nonrandom distribution of aberrant promoter methylation of cancer-related genes in sporadic breast tumors

PURPOSE

In an effort to additionally determine the global patterns of CpG island hypermethylation in sporadic breast cancer, we searched for aberrant promoter methylation at 10 gene loci in 54 primary breast cancer and 10 breast benign lesions.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Genomic DNA sodium bisulfate converted from benign and malignant tissues was used as template in methyl-specific PCR for BRCA1, p16, ESR1, GSTP1, TRbeta1, RARbeta2, HIC1, APC, CCND2, and CDH1 genes.

RESULTS

The majority of the breast cancer (85%) showed aberrant methylation in at least 1 of the loci tested with half of them displaying 3 or more methylated genes. The highest frequency of aberrant promoter methylation was found for HIC1 (48%) followed by ESR1 (46%), and CDH1 (39%). Similar methylation frequencies were detected for breast benign lesions with the exception of the CDH1 gene (P = 0.02). The analysis of methylation distribution indicates a statistically significant association between methylation of the ESR1 promoter, and methylation at CDH1, TRbeta1, GSTP1, and CCND2 loci (P < 0.03). Methylated status of the BRCA1 promoter was inversely correlated with methylation at the RARbeta2 locus (P < 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest a nonrandom distribution for promoter hypermethylation in sporadic breast cancer, with tumor subsets characterized by aberrant methylation of specific cancer-related genes. These breast cancer subgroups may represent separate biological entities with potential differences in sensitivity to therapy, occurrence of metastasis, and overall prognosis.

Altered expression of adhesion molecules and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in silica-induced rat lung carcinogenesis

Loss of the epithelial phenotype and disruption of adhesion molecules is a hallmark in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) reported in several types of cancer. Most of the studies about the relevance of adhesion and junction molecules in lung cancer have been performed using established tumors or in vitro models. The sequential molecular events leading to EMT during lung cancer progression are still not well understood. We have used a rat model for multistep lung carcinogenesis to study the status of adherens and tight junction proteins and mesenchymal markers during EMT. After silica-induced chronic inflammation, rats sequentially develop epithelial hyperplasia, preneoplastic lesions, and tumors such as adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas. In comparison with normal and hyperplastic bronchiolar epithelium and with hyperplastic alveolar type II cells, the expression levels of E-cadherin, alpha-catenin and beta-catenin were significantly reduced in adenomatoid preneoplastic lesions and in late tumors. The loss of E-cadherin in tumors was associated with its promoter hypermethylation. alpha- and beta-catenin dysregulation lead to cytoplasmic accumulation in some carcinomas. No nuclear beta-catenin localization was found at any stage of any preneoplastic or neoplastic lesion. Zonula occludens protein-1 was markedly decreased in 66% of adenocarcinomas and in 100% squamous cell carcinomas. The mesenchymal-associated proteins N-cadherin and vimentin were analyzed as markers for EMT. N-cadherin was de novo expressed in 32% of adenocarcinomas and 33% of squamous cell carcinomas. Vimentin-positive tumor cells were found in 35% of adenocarcinomas and 88% of squamous cell carcinomas. Mesenchymal markers were absent in precursor lesions, both hyperplastic and adenomatoid. The present results show that silica-induced rat lung carcinogenesis is a good model to study EMT in vivo, and also provide in vivo evidence suggesting that the changes in cell-cell adhesion molecules are an early event in lung carcinogenesis, while EMT occurs at a later stage.

Epigenetic alterations in head and neck cancer: prevalence, clinical significance, and implications

Head and neck cancers are a group of malignancies with diverse biologic behaviors and a strong, well-established association with tobacco and alcohol use. Although the hunt for genetic alterations in head and neck cancer has continued in the past two decades, with unequivocal proof of a genetic role in multistage head and neck carcinogenesis, epigenetic alteration in association with promoter CpG island hypermethylation has emerged in the past few years as one of the most active areas of cancer research. It is now firmly believed that, in cancer cells, promoter CpG island hypermethylation (epigenetic alteration) represents a bona fide alternative mechanism, as opposed to genetic factors, such as gene mutations and deletion, in the inactivation of many tumor-suppressor genes. It is also realized that epigenetic and genetic factors often work together, affecting multiple cellular pathways, such as cell-cycle regulation, DNA repair, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and cell-to-cell adhesion, during the process of tumor growth and progression.

Chemically induced DNA hypomethylation in breast carcinoma cells detected by the amplification of intermethylated sites

Introduction

Compromised patterns of gene expression result in genomic instability, altered patterns of gene expression and tumour formation. Specifically, aberrant DNA hypermethylation in gene promoter regions leads to gene silencing, whereas global hypomethylation events can result in chromosomal instability and oncogene activation. Potential links exist between environmental agents and DNA methylation, but the destabilizing effects of environmental exposures on the DNA methylation machinery are not understood within the context of breast cancer aetiology.

Methods

We assessed genome-wide changes in methylation patterns using a unique methylation profiling technique called amplification of intermethylated sites (AIMS). This method generates easily readable fingerprints that represent the investigated cell line's methylation profile, based on the differential cleavage of DNA with methylation-specific isoschisomeric restriction endonucleases.

Results

We validated this approach by demonstrating both unique and reoccurring sites of genomic hypomethylation in four breast carcinoma cell lines treated with the cytosine analogue 5-azacytidine. Comparison of treated with control samples revealed individual bands that exhibited methylation changes, and these bands were excized and cloned, and the precise genomic location individually identified. In most cases, these regions of hypomethylation coincided with susceptible target regions previously associated with chromosome breakage, rearrangement and gene amplification. Similarly, we observed that acute benzopyrene exposure is associated with altered methylation patterns in these cell lines.

Conclusion

These results reinforce the link between environmental exposures, DNA methylation and breast cancer, and support a role for AIMS as a rapid, affordable screening method to identify environmentally induced DNA methylation changes that occur in tumourigenesis.

SLIT2 promoter methylation analysis in neuroblastoma, Wilms' tumour and renal cell carcinoma

The 3p21.3 RASSF1A tumour suppressor gene (TSG) provides a paradigm for TSGs inactivated by promoter methylation rather than somatic mutations. Recently, we identified frequent promoter methylation without somatic mutations of SLIT2 in lung and breast cancers, suggesting similarities between SLIT2 and RASSF1A TSGs. Epigenetic inactivation of RASSF1A was first described in lung and breast cancers and subsequently in a wide range of human cancers including neuroblastoma, Wilms' tumour and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). These findings prompted us to investigate SLIT2 methylation in these three human cancers. We analysed 49 neuroblastomas (NBs), 37 Wilms' tumours and 48 RCC, and detected SLIT2 promoter methylation in 29% of NB, 38% of Wilms' tumours and 25% of RCC. Previously, we had demonstrated frequent RASSF1A methylation in the same tumour series and frequent CASP8 methylation in the NB and Wilms' tumour samples. However, there was no significant association between SLIT2 promoter methylation and RASSF1A or CASP8 methylation in NB and RCC. In Wilms' tumour, there was a trend for a negative association between RASSF1A and SLIT2 methylation, although this did not reach statistical significance. No associations were detected between SLIT2 promoter methylation and specific clinicopathological features in the tumours analysed. These findings implicate SLIT2 promoter methylation in the pathogenesis of both paediatric and adult cancers and suggest that further investigations of SLIT2 in other tumour types should be pursued. However, epigenetic inactivation of SLIT2 is less frequent than RASSF1A in the tumour types analysed.

Cancer epigenetics: DNA methylation and chromatin alterations in human cancer

Aberrations in the DNA methylation patterns are nowadays recognized as a hallmark of human cancer. One of the most characteristic changes is the hypermethylation of CpG islands of tumor suppressor genes associated with their transcriptional silencing. The target genes are distributed in all cellular pathways (apoptosis, DNA repair, cell cycle, cell adherence, etc.). They are "classical" tumor suppressor genes with associated familial cancers (BRCA1, hMLH1, p16INK4a, VHL, etc.) and putative new tumor suppressor genes which loss may contribute to the transformed phenotype (MGMT, p14ARF, GSTP1, RARB2, etc.). A tumor-type specific profile of CpG island hypermethylation exist in human cancer that allows the use of these aberrantly hypermethylated loci as biomarkers of the malignant disease. The eruption of new technologies for the careful study of the DNA methylation patterns, and their genetic partners in accomplishing gene silencing, it may also provide us with new drugs for the epigenetic treatment of human tumors.

Profiling aberrant DNA methylation in hematologic neoplasms: a view from the tip of the iceberg

Cancer is also an epigenetic disease. The main epigenetic modification in humans is DNA methylation. Transformed cells undergo a dramatic change in their DNA methylation patterns: certain CpG islands located in the promoter regions of tumor-suppressor genes become hypermethylated and the contiguous gene rests silenced and this phenomenon occurs in an overall genomic environment of DNA hypomethylation. The profile of CpG island hypermethylation in hematologic malignancies is an epigenetic signature unique for each subtype of leukemia or lymphoma. Although the most widely studied genes are the cell-cycle inhibitors p15INK4b and p16INK4a (specially in AML and ALL), the list of methylation-repressed genes in these neoplasms is expanding very rapidly, including MGMT, RARB2, CRBP1, SOCS-1, CDH1, DAPK1, and others. A necessary cross-talk between genetic alterations and DNA methylation exists: certain chromosomal translocations may induce hypermethylation, such as the PML-RARa, or attract methylation, such as BCR-ABL, but DNA hypomethylation can be the culprit behind the genesis of certain abnormal recombination events. From a translational standpoint, hypermethylation can be used as a marker of recurrent disease or progression, for example, in MDS, or response to chemotherapy, such as MGMT methylation in B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Furthermore, promising studies using DNA demethylating agents and histone deacetylase inhibitors are underway to awake these dormant tumor-suppressor genes for a better treatment of the patient with a hematologic malignancy.

Genetic and epigenetic alterations as hallmarks of the intricate road to cancer

Despite the clonal origin of most tumors, their tremendous heterogeneity suggests that cancer progression springs from the combined forces of both genetic and epigenetic events, which produce variant clonal populations, together with the selective pressures of the microenvironment, which promote growth and, perhaps, dissemination of variants with a specific set of characteristics. Although the importance of genetic mutations in cancer has long been recognized, the role of epigenetic events has been suggested more recently. This review focuses on the genetic and epigenetic molecular mechanisms involved in cancer onset and progression, and discusses the possibility of new strategies in the development of anticancer treatments.

p16INK4A alterations are accompanied by aberrant protein immunostaining in endometrial carcinomas

PURPOSE

To date, the significance of p16INK4A tumor suppressor gene inactivation in sporadic endometrial cancer (EC) has only rarely been described. In this study, we examined the alteration type and frequency of gene alterations [point mutations, aberrant promoter methylation and loss of heterozygosity (LOH)] in 50 sporadic ECs, and correlated the genetic findings with the immunohistochemical expression of the p16INK4A protein and the classical clinicopathological features.

METHODS

Gene mutations were detected by PCR-SSCP-sequencing analysis, promoter hypermethylation by methylation-specific PCR (MSP), and LOH by PCR of the STS-marker c5.1.

RESULTS

In total, p16INK4A alterations were found in 14 of 50 (28%) sporadic ECs. In six (12%) cases, two alterations occurred simultaneously. Partial p16INK4A deletions were found in four of 50 (8%) samples. There was one missense mutation (codon 70; CCC-->GCC) and one frameshift mutation (1-bp deletion in exon 2). Only 2 of 47 (4.2%) tumors exhibited aberrant promoter methylation. An allelic loss was detected in 12 of 50 (24%) carcinomas with a higher incidence in advanced endometrial carcinomas than in early-stage uterine tumors. p16INK4A alterations were generally accompanied by gene silencing, confirmed by aberrant protein immunostaining ( r=-0.442; P=0.001). There was a significant difference in the frequency of p16INK4A alterations between early (stage I; 18%) and advanced (stages II-IV; 58%) ECs ( P=0.022). One case showed complete protein loss, but absence of genetic alterations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that p16INK4A inactivation plays a role in the tumorigenesis of the subset of sporadic ECs, particularly in cases exhibiting an aggressive clinical behavior. We demonstrate that p16INK4A methylation can act efficiently and similarly to other genetic alterations as one of the two necessary hits according to the Knudson two-hit hypothesis of tumor suppressor gene inactivation.

Predicting aberrant CpG island methylation

Epigenetic silencing associated with aberrant methylation of promoter region CpG islands is one mechanism leading to loss of tumor suppressor function in human cancer. Profiling of CpG island methylation indicates that some genes are more frequently methylated than others, and that each tumor type is associated with a unique set of methylated genes. However, little is known about why certain genes succumb to this aberrant event. To address this question, we used Restriction Landmark Genome Scanning to analyze the susceptibility of 1,749 unselected CpG islands to de novo methylation driven by overexpression of DNA cytosine-5-methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1). We found that although the overall incidence of CpG island methylation was increased in cells overexpressing DNMT1, not all loci were equally affected. The majority of CpG islands (69.9%) were resistant to de novo methylation, regardless of DNMT1 overexpression. In contrast, we identified a subset of methylation-prone CpG islands (3.8%) that were consistently hypermethylated in multiple DNMT1 overexpressing clones. Methylation-prone and methylation-resistant CpG islands were not significantly different with respect to size, C+G content, CpG frequency, chromosomal location, or promoter association. We used DNA pattern recognition and supervised learning techniques to derive a classification function based on the frequency of seven novel sequence patterns that was capable of discriminating methylation-prone from methylation-resistant CpG islands with 82% accuracy. The data indicate that CpG islands differ in their intrinsic susceptibility to de novo methylation, and suggest that the propensity for a CpG island to become aberrantly methylated can be predicted based on its sequence context.

Genetic and epigenetic alterations in tumor progression in a dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma

In this case of a dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma, we searched for genetic or epigenetic alterations in both components of the tumor, the low grade chondroblastic component, and the high grade osteosacomatouscomponent. To date, only little is known about aberrant patterns of DNA methylation in chondrosarcomas. Microdissection was used as a valuable method for clearly separating the tissues. We examined CpG island methylation of 8 tumor suppressor genes and candidate tumor suppressor genes, which are involved in different pathways: cell cycle (p21WAF1, p16INK4, p14ARF), apoptosis (DAPK, FHIT), DNA repair (hMLH1), and cell adherence (E-Cadherin). We found p16INK4 and E-cadherin promotor methylation in the low grade chondroid compartment of the dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. P16INK4, FHIT, and E-cadherin were methylated in the highly malignant osteosarcomatous compartment of the tumor. Earlier investigations of this chondrosarcoma showed p53 mutation and p53-LOH in the anaplastic component. As shown in this case, it was accompanied by Rb-LOH. Early methylation of p16IK4 and E-cadherin in the chondroid compartment could point to the monoclonal origin of demonstrated dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. Further alterations, as shown in p53, Rb and FHIT, are responsible for the "switch" to a high grade anaplastic sarcoma.

Capillary electrophoresis-based method to quantitate DNA-protein interactions

A novel, rapid and simple capillary electrophoretic mobility shift assay (CEMSA) with laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) has been developed for the quantitative study of protein-DNA interactions. This method is particularly useful for the study of basic proteins, the most common of the DNA-interacting proteins. To avoid protein stickiness to the capillary walls we have introduced the use of neutral polyacrylamide that requires the use of reverse polarity. Under these conditions, excellent separation of DNA and protein-DNA complexes was obtained without the requirement of a gel matrix, thereby allowing the easy and reliable quantification of protein-DNA affinities. Analysis of the affinities of histones H2B and H4 for a synthetic oligo have been used to demonstrate the reproducibility and accuracy of this method. We have observed that H4 has a higher affinity for DNA than H2B, with half saturation fractions lying in the micromolar range.

Relevance of DNA methylation in the management of cancer

Many genetic and environmental factors contribute to development of cancer, but DNA methylation may provide a link between these influences. Genome stability and normal gene expression are largely maintained by a fixed and predetermined pattern of DNA methylation. In cancer, this idealistic scenario is disrupted by an interesting phenomenon: the hypermethylation of regulatory regions called CpG islands in some tumour suppressor genes--eg, BRCA1, hMLH1, p16INK4a, APC, VHL--which causes their inactivation. Development of new techniques that couple bisulphite modification with PCR has enabled these alterations to be studied in all types of biological fluids and archived tissues. Potentially, there are four types of translational studies that can be used to investigate the aberrant pattern of DNA methylation in cancer. First, CpG island hypermethylation can be used as a marker to identify cancer cells from biological samples, eg, serum and urine. This technique is highly sensitive and informative because profiles of tumour-suppressor-gene inactivation are specific to particular cancers. Second, single and combined genes that are inactivated by promoter hypermethylation, such as p16INK4a and DAPK, can be used as prognostic factors. Third, products of genes that are silenced by DNA methylation can be used as biomarkers of response to chemotherapy or hormone therapy--eg, the DNA repair O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and the oestrogen receptor. Finally, dormant tumour suppressor genes can be reactivated by DNA demethylating drugs, with the aim of reversing the neoplastic phenotype. These are new avenues worth exploring in the fight against cancer.

Concomitant expression of p16INK4a and p14ARF in primary breast cancer and analysis of inactivation mechanisms

The INK4a/ARF locus encodes two tumour suppressor proteins, p16INK4a and p14ARF, which act in the two main cell-cycle control pathways, p16-Rb and p14-p53 respectively. The present study examined the mRNA expression of these genes by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and the inactivation mechanisms that alter these levels, in 100 primary breast carcinomas. Furthermore, the interdependence of these mechanisms was examined, since it has been reported that p14ARF is altered in most tumours in concordance with p16INK4a. The results show that promoter hypermethylation, tested by methylation-specific PCR (MSP), was the major mechanism of inactivation of these genes and was present in 31 (31%) and 50 (50%) of the tumours that showed decreased p16INK4a and p14ARF expression, respectively. Hemizygous deletion was the second cause of down-regulation. Homozygous deletion was rare and mutation was absent. In most tumours overexpressing p16INK4a or p14ARF, no detectable inactivation mechanisms were observed. Finally, the results indicate that these proteins are often co-altered in primary breast tumours and that p16INK4a and p14ARF had non-independent behaviour, since they were silenced or overexpressed concomitantly with a significant correlation (p < 0.05).

Hypomethylation: one side of a larger picture

Hypomethylation signifies one end of a spectrum of DNA methylation states. In most cases hypomethylation refers to a relative state that represents a change from the "normal" methylation level. Hypomethylation, when approached from a topographical perspective, has been used to describe either overall decreases in the methylation status of the entire genome (global hypomethylation) or more localized relative demethylation of specific subsets of the genome, such as the promoter regions of protooncogenes or normally highly methylated repetitive sequences. Global hypomethylation accompanied by gene-specific hypermethylation is observed in at least two important settings: cancer and aging. Global hypomethylation is generally reflective of decreased methylation in CpGs dispersed throughout repetitive sequences as well as the bodies of genes. Hypomethylation of repetitive and parasitic DNA sequences correlates with a number of adverse outcomes. For example, decreased methylation of repetitive sequences in the satellite DNA of the pericentric region of chromosomes is associated with increased chromosomal rearrangements, a hallmark of cancer. Decreased methylation of proviral sequences can lead to reactivation and increased infectivity. However, hypomethylation in cancer can also affect the CpGs in the promoters of specific genes-namely, protooncogenes-leading to their overexpression and resulting in the functional outcome of increased cell proliferation. Thus, hypomethylation, in a variety of settings in which it represents a deviation from "normal," appears to correlate with progression to cancer and offers potential mechanisms to explain the carcinogenic process.

Epigenetic gene silencing in cancer initiation and progression

Hypermethylation of CpG islands, an epigenetic event that is not accompanied by changes in DNA sequence, represents an alternative mechanism to deletions or mutations to inactivate tumor suppressor genes. Recent evidence supports the notion that CpG island hypermethylation, by silencing key cancer-related genes, plays a major causal role in cancer. However, a long-standing issue in the field is the sequence of molecular events leading to epigenetic gene silencing. A new model has been proposed that chromatin remodeling, as a result of histone deacetylation and methylation, is the primary event in abrogating transcriptional initiation; subsequently, CpG island hypermethylation establishes a permanent state of gene silencing. Accumulating evidence indicates that CpG island hypermethylation is an early event in cancer development and, in some cases, may precede the neoplastic process. Because of their heritable nature, hypermethylated CpG islands leave 'molecular footprints' in evolving cancer cells and can be used as molecular markers to reconstruct epigenetic progression during tumorigenesis. Furthermore, hypermethylated CpG islands are proving to be useful for molecular classification of different cancer types.

Hypermethylation pathways to colorectal cancer. Implications for prevention and detection

Epigenetic changes play an important role in the development and progression of colorectal cancer. The best characterized of these changes is the promoter region methylation of CpG islands of genes that play key roles in this disease. These changes compliment and lead to genetic changes that are well established as central to colorectal cancer progression. They may also prove useful in molecular detection approaches.

Alterations of DNA methylation in hematologic malignancies

The DNA methylation profile of cancer cells is frequently characterized by global hypomethylation and simultaneous hypermethylation of selected CpG island gene promoters. In recent years, the epigenetic phenomenon of DNA promoter methylation has gained increasing recognition as an important mechanism for transcriptional inactivation of cancer related genes. Studies on both liquid and solid tumors have revealed myriad aberrant methylation events, some of which may provide important clues to the pathogenesis of these tumors. The identification of these methylation alterations and elucidation of the mechanistic events surrounding them are of prime importance, as the methylation status of cancer cells can now be manipulated in vivo with demethylating chemotherapeutics.

DNA array-based method for detection of large rearrangements in the BRCA1 gene

In most families with multiple cases of breast and ovarian cancer, the cancer appears to be associated with germline alterations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. However, somatic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in sporadic breast and ovarian tumors are rare, even though loss of heterozygosity in BRCA1 and BRCA2 loci in these tumors appears frequently. This may be attributed to mutation detection assays that detect alterations in the coding regions and splice site junctions, but that miss large gene rearrangements. To look specifically for mutations such as large gene rearrangements that span several kilobases (kb) of genomic DNA, we have developed a fluorescence DNA microarray assay. This assay rapidly and simultaneously screens for such rearrangements along the entire gene. In our screen of 15 malignant ovarian tumors, we found one sample with a novel 3-kb deletion encompassing exon 17 of BRCA1 that leads to a frameshift mutation. This deletion was not detected in the corresponding constitutive DNA. Our results indicate that, whereas somatic mutations in BRCA1 appear to be rare in ovarian cancers, the search for large gene rearrangements should be included in any BRCA1 mutational analysis. Furthermore, the method described in this report has the potential to screen clinical tumor samples for genomic rearrangements simultaneously in a large number of cancer-associated genes.

BRCA1 methylation: a significant role in tumour development?

Cancer is a multistep process resulting from an accumulation of genetic mutations leading to dysfunction of critical genes, including tumour suppressor genes. Epigenetic changes are now also recognised as an important alternative mechanism of gene inactivation. In particular, aberrant methylation of the promoter region of a gene can lead to silencing ultimately contributing to the initiation or malignant progression of tumours. BRCA1, a breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene, is a tumour suppressor gene involved in the maintenance of genome integrity. Recent evidence for BRCA1 hypermethylation corroborates the view that this epigenetic alteration may play a determinant role in tumour suppressor silencing and possibly tumorigenesis. Here, we offer a summary of the data providing evidence for BRCA1 hypermethylation in tumours, and an investigation into the associated mechanism leading to BRCA1 silencing. We also discuss the impact of BRCA1 hypermethylation, as a form of epigenetic change, versus BRCA1 genetic mutations in tumour development.

Modeling cancer in mice

The laboratory mouse is one of the most powerful tools for both gene discovery and validation in cancer genetics. Recent technological advances in engineering the mouse genome with chromosome translocations, latent alleles, and tissue-specific and temporally regulated mutations have provided more exacting models of human disease. The marriage of mouse tumor models with rapidly evolving methods to profile genetic and epigenetic alterations in tumors, and to finely map genetic modifier loci, will continue to provide insight into the key pathways leading to tumorigenesis. These discoveries hold great promise for identifying relevant drug targets for treating human cancer.

The study of aberrant methylation in cancer via restriction landmark genomic scanning

Restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS) has been used to study DNA methylation in cancer for nearly a decade. The strong bias of RLGS for assessing the methylation state of CpG islands genome wide makes this an attractive technique to study both hypo- and hypermethylation of regions of the genome likely to harbor genes. RLGS has been used successfully to identify regions of hypomethylation, candidate tumor suppressor genes, correlations between hypermethylation events and clinical factors, and quantification of hypermethylation in a multitude of malignancies. This review will examine the major uses of RLGS in the study of aberrant methylation in cancer and discuss the significance of some of the findings.

CpG island hypermethylation and tumor suppressor genes: a booming present, a brighter future

We have come a long way since the first reports of the existence of aberrant DNA methylation in human cancer. Hypermethylation of CpG islands located in the promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes is now firmly established as an important mechanism for gene inactivation. CpG island hypermethylation has been described in almost every tumor type. Many cellular pathways are inactivated by this type of epigenetic lesion: DNA repair (hMLH1, MGMT), cell cycle (p16(INK4a), p15(INK4b), p14(ARF)), apoptosis (DAPK), cell adherence (CDH1, CDH13), detoxification (GSTP1), etc em leader However, we still know little of the mechanisms of aberrant methylation and why certain genes are selected over others. Hypermethylation is not an isolated layer of epigenetic control, but is linked to the other pieces of the puzzle such as methyl-binding proteins, DNA methyltransferases and histone deacetylase, but our understanding of the degree of specificity of these epigenetic layers in the silencing of specific tumor suppressor genes remains incomplete. The explosion of user-friendly technologies has given rise to a rapidly increasing list of hypermethylated genes. Careful functional and genetic studies are necessary to determine which hypermethylation events are truly relevant for human tumorigenesis. The development of CpG island hypermethylation profiles for every form of human tumors has yielded valuable pilot clinical data in monitoring and treating cancer patients based in our knowledge of DNA methylation. Basic and translational will both be needed in the near future to fully understand the mechanisms, roles and uses of CpG island hypermethylation in human cancer. The expectations are high.

The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer

Patterns of DNA methylation and chromatin structure are profoundly altered in neoplasia and include genome-wide losses of, and regional gains in, DNA methylation. The recent explosion in our knowledge of how chromatin organization modulates gene transcription has further highlighted the importance of epigenetic mechanisms in the initiation and progression of human cancer. These epigenetic changes -- in particular, aberrant promoter hypermethylation that is associated with inappropriate gene silencing -- affect virtually every step in tumour progression. In this review, we discuss these epigenetic events and the molecular alterations that might cause them and/or underlie altered gene expression in cancer.

Loss of heterozygosity analysis at the BRCA loci in tumor samples from patients with familial breast cancer

The BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are responsible for a high proportion of familial breast cancer; germline mutations in these genes confer a lifetime risk of about 70% for developing breast cancer. Most of the described deleterious mutations are small deletions or insertions that originate a truncated protein; however, in many cases, they are amino acid changes whose significance is unknown. In these cases, there are some tests that can analyze the meaning of these variants, but most remain unclassified. The BRCA genes are tumor suppressors and it is believed that complete loss of the wild-type allele is a common mechanism of inactivation in tumors from patients carrying a germline deleterious mutation in these genes; if this is true, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis in the tumor sample could help to distinguish if a rare variant is either a deleterious mutation or a common polymorphism. In the present study, we performed LOH analysis at the BRCA loci in 47 tumors from patients who belonged to high-risk breast cancer families and were carriers of any type of alteration in these genes. Our results suggest that (i) loss of the wild-type allele is the most common mechanism of inactivation in tumors from patients who carry a deleterious mutation in any of the genes, (ii) this loss is not common when we analyze familial tumors not associated with mutations in BRCA and (iii) LOH can be used to clarify variants of unknown significance in the BRCA genes.

Altered methylation patterns in cancer cell genomes: cause or consequence?

CpG islands are associated with at least half of all cellular genes and are normally methylation-free. Dense methylation of cytosine residues within islands causes strong and heritable transcriptional silencing. Such silencing normally occurs almost solely at genes subject to genomic imprinting or to X chromosome inactivation. Aberrant methylation of CpG islands associated with tumor suppressor genes has been proposed to contribute to carcinogenesis. However, questions of mechanisms underlying the cancer changes and the precise consequences for tumorigenesis exist in the field, and must continue to be addressed before the importance of abnormalities in genomic methylation patterns in carcinogenesis can be fully understood. In this article, two workers in DNA methylation, one concentrating on cancer biology and the other on developmental biology, address recurrent questions about cancer epigenetics from different perspectives. The goal is to highlight important controversies in the field which can be productive targets of ongoing and future research.