Correlation of prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason grade in academic and community settings

Minimal adenocarcinoma in prostate needle biopsy tissue

One of the major diagnostic challenges in prostate needle biopsy interpretation is definitive establishment of a malignant diagnosis based on a minimal or limited amount of carcinoma in needle biopsy tissue. Major and minor diagnostic criteria should be used for interpretation of small foci of carcinoma. The constellation of findings and a combination of the major and minor diagnostic criteria permit a definitive diagnosis of focal adenocarcinoma. The differential diagnosis of minimal prostatic adenocarcinoma in needle biopsy tissue is broad and includes many benign lesions. The benign entities most likelty to be misdiagnosed as minimal prostatic adenocarcinoma are atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (adenosis) and atrophy. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and a descriptive diagnosis of focal glandular atypia or atypical small acinar proliferation also should be considered before diagnosing minimal adenocarcinoma. The most valuable adjunctive study for the diagnosis of minimal adenocarcinoma is immunohistochemistry using antibody 34 beta E12, reactive against basal cell-specific high-molecular-weight cytokeratins. Most cases can be diagnosed based on H&E-stained sections without this immunostain. Most minimal carcinomas in prostate needle biopsy tissue are of intermediate histologic grade, and most are indicative of pathologically significant carcinoma in the whole prostate gland.

Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3+4 versus Gleason score 4+3 tumor at radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To determine the clinical significance of Gleason score 3+4 versus 4+3 on radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

Of 2390 men who underwent radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon, 570 had Gleason score 7 tumors without lymph node metastasis, seminal vesicle invasion, or tertiary Gleason pattern 5. Patients were evaluated for biochemical recurrence (prostate-specific antigen progression) and distant metastases.

RESULTS

Eighty percent of patients had Gleason score 3+4, 20% had 4+3. The rate of established extraprostatic extension at radical prostatectomy for Gleason score 3+4 and 4+3 tumors was 38.2% and 52.7%, respectively (P = 0.008). With a mean follow-up of 4.6 years for men without progression, Gleason score 4+3 tumors had an increased risk of progression independent of stage and margin status (P <0.0001). The 5-year actuarial risk of progression was 15% and 40% for Gleason score 3+4 and 4+3 tumors, respectively. The mean time to progression was 4.4 years for Gleason score 3+4 tumors and 3.2 years for Gleason score 4+3 tumors. We stratified the patients into four prognostic groups on the basis of organ-confined status, margin status, and Gleason score (3+4 versus 4+3). The 5-year actuarial risk of progression was 10%, 35%, 45%, and 61%, with 10-year progression rates of 29%, 42%, 69%, and 84%, for the four groups. 3.9% of patients with Gleason score 3+4 and 10. 5% with Gleason score 4+3 tumors developed metastatic disease within a mean of 5.7 and 5.6 years, respectively. A Gleason score of 4+3 versus 3+4 was predictive of metastatic disease (P = 0.002) but not local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Gleason score 7 tumors are heterogeneous in their biologic behavior. The differences in prognosis for patients with Gleason scores 3+4 and 4+3 tumors at radical prostatectomy are significant. Although the assessment of the percentage of pattern 4 at radical prostatectomy is not likely to be reproducible, the distinction between Gleason score 3+4 and 4+3 should be easier for pathologists to perform.

Prognostic factors in prostate cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999

BACKGROUND

Under the auspices of the College of American Pathologists, a multidisciplinary group of clinicians, pathologists, and statisticians considered prognostic and predictive factors in prostate cancer and stratified them into categories reflecting the strength of published evidence and taking into account the expert opinions of the Prostate Working Group members.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Factors were ranked according to the previous College of American Pathologists categorical rankings: category I, factors proven to be of prognostic importance and useful in clinical patient management; category II, factors that have been extensively studied biologically and clinically but whose importance remains to be validated in statistically robust studies; and category III, all other factors not sufficiently studied to demonstrate their prognostic value. Factors in categories I and II were considered with respect to variations in methods of analysis, interpretation of findings, reporting of data, and statistical evaluation. For each factor, detailed recommendations for improvement were made. Recommendations were based on the following aims: (1) increasing uniformity and completeness of pathologic evaluation of tumor specimens, (2) enhancing the quality of data collected pertaining to existing prognostic factors, and (3) improving patient care.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Factors ranked in category I included preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level, TNM stage grouping, histologic grade as Gleason score, and surgical margin status. Category II factors included tumor volume, histologic type, and DNA ploidy. Factors in category III included perineural invasion, neuroendocrine differentiation, microvessel density, nuclear roundness, chromatin texture, other karyometric factors, proliferation markers, prostate-specific antigen derivatives, and other factors (oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, apoptosis genes, etc).

Diagnosis of localized prostate cancer: 10 years of progress

Advances in the diagnosis of early stage disease, and particularly the introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, have had a dramatic effect on the presentation and clinical management of prostate cancer during the past ten years. As a result, there have been significant epidemiological changes in countries where early diagnosis is recommended. The importance of PSA testing for the diagnosis of localized prostate cancer has become well established in clinical practice and this is reflected by improved outcomes from definitive treatment. The contribution of PSA-related parameters and molecular forms of PSA both to cancer detection and prediction of pathological stage continue to be explored. Concerns about the reliability of the standard sextant biopsy technique for cancer detection relate to the need for re-biopsy in a growing number of patients with negative biopsies and an increasing proportion of patients with low volume, multifocal disease. In men with cancer, additional prognostic information can be derived from biopsy findings, with important therapeutic implications. This relates also to the need for reliable markers indicating pathological stage and risk of progression. The opportunities for the prevention of prostate cancer have grown with improved understanding of its biology and the genetic basis of the early steps associated with malignant transformation. In the future, the need for therapeutic intervention is likely to be most influenced by successful prevention strategies.

Needle biopsy of recurrent adenocarcinoma of the prostate after radical prostatectomy

The objective of this study was to evaluate needle biopsy of recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. We evaluated 37 cases of recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy that were diagnosed by needle biopsy between March 1984 and July 1998. Fifteen were from consultations in which contributors were uncertain of the diagnosis, and 22 were from men who had come to The Johns Hopkins Hospital for treatment. The median interval from radical prostatectomy to biopsy showing recurrent tumor was 40 months. There was no correlation between the interval to recurrence and either pathologic features of the biopsy and radical prostatectomy or various clinical features. The mean extent of adenocarcinoma in the biopsies was 3.2 mm (range, 0.1 to 18 mm; median, 2 mm). The length of recurrent cancer on biopsy correlated with an abnormal rectal examination (P = .001). The mean Gleason score for the recurrent tumors was 6.5, which correlated with the grade of the radical prostatectomy cancer (P = .005). The cancers often lacked overt histologic features of malignancy. Benign prostatic acini were seen in five cases (14%), usually separate from the cancer. In 5 (33%) of the consultation cases, we would not have been able to diagnose cancer if not for the fact that atypical prostate glands should not be present after radical prostatectomy. In well-sampled radical prostatectomies, margins were almost always positive, as was extraprostatic extension. In cases with less sampling, there was a higher incidence of organ-confined disease and margin-negative disease implying suboptimal processing of the radical prostatectomy. After radical prostatectomy, recurrent cancer on needle biopsies may be focal and difficult to diagnose and must be assessed differently than in patients who have not had surgery.

3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) for high grade prostate cancer: a multi-institutional review

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results of 3DCRT and the effect of higher than traditional doses in patients with high grade prostate cancer, we compiled data from three institutions and analyzed the outcome of this relatively uncommon subset of prostate cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The 180 patients with Gleason score 8- 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostrate were treated with 3DCRT at the Univer sity of Michigan Health System, University of California-San Francisco, or Fox Chase Cancer. Eligible patients had T1-T4 NO or NX MO adenocarci noma with a pretreatment PSA. Pretreatment characteristics included: me dian age 72 years, 60.6% Gleason score 8 tumors, 57.6% T1-T2, and median pretreatment PSA 17.1 ng/ml (range 0.3-257.1). The total dose received was <70 Gy in 30%, 70-75 Gy in 37%, and >75 Gy in 33%, 27% received adju vant or neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. The median follow-up was 3.0 years for all patients and 16% of patients were followed up for at least 5 years.

RESULTS

The 5-year freedom from PSA failure was 62.5% for all patients and 79.3% in T1-T2 patients. Univariate analysis revealed that T-stage (T1-T2 vs. T3-T4), pretreatment PSA, and RT dose predicted for freedom from PSA failure. A 5-year overall survival for all patients was 67.3%. Only RT dose was predictive of 5-year overall survival on univariate analysis. Because a significant association was seen between T-stage and RT dose, the Cox proportional hazards model was performed separately for T1-T2 and T3-T4 tumors. None of the prognostic factors reached statistical significance for overall survival or freedom from PSA failure in T3-T4 patients or for overall survival in T1-T2 patients. Lower RT dose and higher pretreatment PSA predicted for PSA failure on multivariate analysis in T1-T2 patients.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study from three institutions with experience in dose escalation suggests a dose effect for PSA control above 70 Gy in patients with T1-T2 high grade prostate cancer. These results are superior to surgery and emphasize the need for dose escalation in treating Gleason 8-10 prostate cancer.

Race and cause specific survival with prostate cancer: influence of clinical stage, Gleason score, age and treatment

PURPOSE

We assess the influence of race on stage stratified cause specific survival of men with prostate cancer, and Gleason score, age at diagnosis and treatment on potential racial differences in survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 524 black and 396 white men were diagnosed with prostate cancer at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center between January 1982 and December 1992. Clinical stage was determined by retrospective review of the medical records and Gleason score of biopsy material as assigned by a single uropathologist. Of 611 patients who died the cause of death was determined by retrospective or prospective review of hospital records in 493 and by review of the death certificates in 102. In 16 cases the cause of death was indeterminate. Median potential followup was 112 months (range 60 to 182) and median period of observation was 61 months (range 1 to 182).

RESULTS

Cause specific survival with stage T1b-2 cancer was lower in 231 black than in 264 white men of all ages (p = 0.02) and lower in 110 black than in 170 white men younger than in 70 years at diagnosis (p = 0.04). Gleason 7 to 10 cancer, which was associated with a less favorable cause specific survival compared to Gleason 2 to 6 cancer (p <0.0001), was more common in black than in white men with stage T1b-2 cancer of all ages (p = 0.01) and younger than 70 years at diagnosis (p = 0.04). No or unknown treatment status, which was associated with a less favorable cause specific survival compared to treatment (p = 0.05), was more common in black than in white men with stage T1b-2 cancer of all ages (p = 0.0005) but not significantly different when stratified by age. In men of all ages racial differences in cause specific survival were not significant when adjusted for age and Gleason score (p = 0.14) or age, Gleason score and treatment status (p = 0.17). In men younger than 70 years racial differences in cause specific survival were not significant when adjusted for age and Gleason score (p = 0.22). There were no significant racial differences in overall or age stratified all cause survival of men with stage T1b-2 cancer. There were no significant differences in overall or age stratified cause specific or all cause survival of 112 black and 58 white men with stage T3-4 cancer, or 181 and 74, respectively, with metastatic cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that local stage prostate cancer is more lethal in black than in white men and the difference is most pronounced in men younger than 70 years. The survival disadvantage of black men with local stage cancer is due in part to a propensity for development of less differentiated and more aggressive malignancies.

Can ploidy of prostate carcinoma diagnosed on needle biopsy predict radical prostatectomy stage and grade?

PURPOSE

Deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy correlates with the biological behavior of prostate carcinoma. However, the usefulness of ploidy on needle biopsies that show prostate cancer has not been established to our knowledge.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively determined ploidy on needle biopsies of 159 men with prostate carcinoma treated surgically at Johns Hopkins Hospital. Ploidy was determined by image analysis of Feulgen stained slides. Needle ploidy and Gleason score were compared as prognostic tools in the prediction of grade and stage of subsequent prostatectomy.

RESULTS

Of the 159 cases 98 (62%) were diploid, 16 (10%) tetraploid and 45 (28%) aneuploid. Of the diploid, tetraploid and aneuploid tumors 69, 50 and 44%, respectively, proved to be organ confined. Tetraploid and aneuploid tumors were grouped for the remaining analysis. Needle ploidy correlated significantly with pathological stage (p = 0.003). However, needle Gleason score correlated even more strongly (p <0.001), and on multivariate analysis ploidy was not further predictive of pathological stage once Gleason score was considered. Needle ploidy and Gleason score were predictive of prostatectomy Gleason score (6 or less versus 7 or greater), and on multivariate analysis ploidy was an independently significant predictor of this parameter (p = 0.04). In 13 cases (8%) there was an important grading discrepancy, in which needle ploidy would have accurately predicted prostatectomy grade. However, in 33 cases (21%) needle and prostatectomy Gleason scores were congruent, and needle ploidy did not accurately predict prostatectomy Gleason score.

CONCLUSIONS

With accurate needle Gleason grading, ploidy is not helpful in predicting prostatectomy findings. However, ploidy correlates with prostatectomy stage and grade, and may be useful if accurate Gleason grading is a concern.

Diagnosis of prostate cancer in needle biopsies after radiation therapy

Interpretation of postirradiation needle biopsies is a major diagnostic challenge for the pathologist because of substantial radiation-induced changes in benign and malignant prostatic tissue. Reports that have systematically evaluated the histopathologic findings in postirradiation needle biopsies are limited. In this study, we evaluated 46 histologic features in 29 postirradiation needle biopsy specimens from 29 patients. All patients had recurrent cancer on needle biopsies after external beam radiation, and all subsequently underwent salvage radical prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Patient age ranged from 57 to 78 years (mean, 61 years). The interval from radiation therapy to biopsy ranged from 1.0 to 17 years (mean, 3.9 years). Histologic features that were helpful in the diagnosis of cancer after radiation therapy included infiltrative growth, perineural invasion, intraluminal crystalloids, blue mucin secretions, the absence of corpora amylacea, and the presence of coexistent high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Benign glands usually showed nuclear enlargement (86%) and prominent nucleoli (50%), and therefore, these cytologic features alone were not reliable for the diagnosis of cancer after irradiation. Postirradiation needle biopsies underestimated the prostatectomy Gleason grade in 35% of cases and overestimated it in 14% of cases; these results were similar to published reports from patients not receiving radiation therapy. There was a major discrepancy in degree of radiation effect between radical prostatectomy and biopsies. Moderate or severe radiation effect on cancer was present in 48% of needle biopsy specimens, whereas 94% of radical prostatectomy specimens had no or minimal radiation effect on cancer when the areas with the least amount of radiation effect were chosen for quantification. These findings indicate that quantification of radiation effect in needle biopsy specimens was inaccurate and potentially misleading. Conversely, Gleason grade in postirradiation needle biopsy specimens appeared to provide useful predictive information and should be reported.

Histopathologic effects of three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy on benign and malignant prostate tissues

We reviewed 137 prostate sextant needle biopsies from 137 patients obtained at a median of 35.7 months after three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy (3DCRT). Thirty-one patients (23%) received 3 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) before 3DCRT. We also retrospectively reviewed and assigned a combined Gleason score to the pre-3DCRT needle biopsies (97 patients) or transurethral resection of the prostate gland (1 patient). High-molecular-weight cytokeratin (34betaE12) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) immunohistochemistry was performed in select cases. After 3DCRT, histopathologic changes in benign prostate gland consisted of glandular atrophy, cytologic atypia, and basal cell prominence. The benign glands showed intensely positive reactions with antibodies to high-molecular-weight cytokeratin (34betaE12) and negative to weakly positive reactions to PSA. Paneth cell-like change was seen in 44 (32%) of the biopsies, mucinous metaplasia in 29 (21%), luminal blue-tinged mucinous secretions in 14 (10%), and squamous metaplasia in 8 (6%). The changes in benign prostate tissues were similar between patients treated with ADT and 3DCRT and those treated with 3DCRT alone. After 3DCRT, we recognized two histologic patterns of prostate cancer: (1) prostate cancer showing radiation therapy (RT)-related changes characterized by PSA-positive/34betaE12-negative poorly formed glands or individual cells with abundant clear to finely granular cytoplasm, and (2) prostate cancer showing no apparent RT effect. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) was seen in 12 post-3DCRT biopsies (8.8%). The use of neoadjuvant ADT had a significant impact on the results of post-RT biopsy. Of the 31 patients treated with neoadjuvant ADT and 3DCRT, 3 (10%) had post-3DCRT biopsies showing prostate cancer without RT effect compared to 44 of 106 men (41%) treated with 3DCRT alone (p = 0.004). Compared to the Gleason score pre-RT, the Gleason score of cancers showing no RT effect was the same in 25 patients (71%), +/-1 point in 8 patients (23%), and +2 points in 2 patients (6%). The mean combined Gleason score post-RT was slightly, although significantly, higher than that pre-RT (7.29 +/- 0.71 versus 7.00 +/- 0.59, p = 0.01). Serum PSA at the time of post-3DCRT biopsy correlated with biopsy results. Prostate cancer without therapy effect was seen in only one of 43 patients (2%) with a serum PSA level < or = 1 ng/ml compared to 46 of 94 patients (49%) with a PSA level > 1 ng/ml (p = 0.0001). After 3DCRT, benign prostate glands show profound histopathologic changes and may be confused with prostate cancer. The effects of 3DCRT on prostate cancer are variable, with some cases showing profound therapy-related changes and others showing no apparent therapy effect.

Significance of small foci of Gleason score 7 or greater prostate cancer on needle biopsy

OBJECTIVES

With increased screening for prostate cancer, we have noted a greater number of patients with small foci of Gleason score 7 or greater prostate cancer on needle biopsy. The significance of these findings is unknown.

METHODS

We studied 57 men with small foci of Gleason score 7 or greater on needle biopsy. Tumor length was less than 1.5 mm in all but 2 cases. In those 2 cases, there were two minute (less than 0.5 mm) foci of cancer separated by 1.8 mm. The length of cancer ranged from 0.2 to 1.8 mm (mean 0.63 mm). In all cases, only one core was involved.

RESULTS

Thirty-three men underwent radical prostatectomy (RP), 14 received radiation, 8 underwent surveillance, and 2 received hormonal therapy. Men who underwent RP were younger (62 years) than those who had radiotherapy (69.1 years), who were younger than those who underwent surveillance (74.5 years). The mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for men undergoing RP was 8.0 ng/mL (range 1.4 to 22). Preoperative serum PSA values did not predict organ-confined status. Needle biopsy grades were as follows: 3 + 4 = 7 (n = 30); 4 + 3 = 7 (n = 17); 4 + 4 = 8 (n = 7); 5 + 4 = 9 (n = 1); and 5 + 5 = 10 (n = 2). We were able to review slides in 27 of the RP specimens, of which 24 were well sampled. Of these 24 cases, 33% had positive margins and 33% were not organ confined; the median tumor volume was 0.5 cc (mean 1.04). No difference in RP tumor volume was found between tumors with needle biopsy Gleason primary grade 3 and those with 4 or greater. The percentage of Gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy weakly correlated with the percentage of Gleason pattern 4 in the RP specimen (P = 0.04). However, the percentage of Gleason pattern 4 only in the RP specimen, but not in the biopsy, correlated with whether the tumor was organ confined.

CONCLUSIONS

The likelihood of having organ-confined disease with small foci of Gleason score 7 or greater on needle biopsy appears to be equivalent to that calculated from the Partin Tables for greater amounts of Gleason score 6 cancer on needle biopsy. In men who are considering RP, small foci of Gleason score 7 or greater adenocarcinoma on needle biopsy should not necessarily be considered an adverse finding.

Treatment changes in prostatic hyperplasia and cancer, including androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy

Substantial and characteristic changes occur in the microscopic appearance and immunophenotype of the hyperplastic prostate and adenocarcinoma following androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy. These changes are rarely seen in untreated cancer, and in the authors' opinion, the combinations of features following therapy are sufficiently distinctive to warrant recognition. Pathologists must be aware of these distinct changes because of the reliance placed on nuclear and nucleolar size in the identification of prostate cancer, particularly in small specimens and lymph node metastases.

Prostate. Practice parameters, pathologic staging, and handling radical prostatectomy specimens

This article addresses the handling, processing, and reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens with the goal of providing general guidelines and practical suggestions for the surgical pathologist. During the last decade, pathologists in academic and community institutions have witnessed a surge in the number of radical prostatectomy specimens evaluated in their departments. Unlike the relative familiarity most pathologists have with other major oncologic resections, radical prostatectomy specimens present an interesting and occasionally frustrating challenge with respect to gross evaluation, sampling, and reporting.

Prostate biopsy interpretation. Current concepts, 1999

Needle biopsy of the prostate has a pivotal role in the diagnosis of prostate cancer and the prediction of outcome. Strategies for sampling the prostate are being refined, which will increase the diagnostic yield. In combination with other clinical factors, the pathologic findings obtained from the biopsy specimen provide enhanced predictive accuracy for stage and individual outcome.

Can perineural invasion on prostate needle biopsy predict prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy?

PURPOSE

We evaluated the role of perineural invasion identified on prostate needle biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1993 and 1998 radical prostatectomy was performed in 319 consecutive patients. Prostate needle biopsies were reviewed in all cases. We compared perineural invasion with other preoperative parameters, including digital rectal examination, PSA and biopsy Gleason score, for the ability to predict PSA recurrence with recurrence defined as any serum PSA level greater than 0.2 ng./ml.

RESULTS

Perineural invasion was identified on 77 of 319 preoperative prostate biopsies (24%). There was PSA recurrence in 46 patients (14.4%) at a mean followup of 25.4 months (range 0.2 to 62.1). Perineural invasion statistically correlated with PSA recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed disease-free survival rates of 24 versus 64% when perineural invasion was and was not present in the prostate biopsy (p = 0.0003, log rank 12.92). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that perineural invasion (p = 0.012) and PSA (p = 0.005) were independent preoperative predictive factors of PSA recurrence. When perineural invasion was compared with postoperative parameters, including disease stage, surgical margins and seminal vesicle invasion, it was not an independent predictor because it closely correlated with tumor stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Perineural invasion on preoperative prostate needle biopsy is a strong independent predictor of PSA recurrence in patients in whom prostate cancer was treated with radical prostatectomy.

Needle biopsy DNA ploidy status predicts grade shifting in prostate cancer

DNA ploidy analysis of prostate needle biopsy specimens was performed to determine whether ploidy status could predict tumor grade shifting at radical prostatectomy. The paired needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens from 111 randomly selected men with prostate cancer were obtained from the surgical pathology files of the Albany Medical Center Hospital. The original tumor grades were assigned by a staff of 12 surgical pathologists according to the Gleason system. Tumors with original Gleason scores < or = 6 were classified as low grade, and tumors with scores of > or = 7 were considered high grade. DNA ploidy analysis was performed on the needle biopsy specimens using the CAS 200 image analyzer (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, Mountain View, CA, USA) on Feulgen stained 5-microm tissue sections. There were 88 diploid and 23 nondiploid cases. Thirty-eight of 111 (34%) of cases had grade shifting from needle biopsy to radical prostatectomy specimens. Of 89 low-grade needle biopsy cases, 28 (31%) were upgraded at radical prostatectomy. Of 22 high-grade needle biopsy cases, 10 (45%) were downgraded to low grade at radical prostatectomy. Of the 28 low-grade needle biopsy specimens that were upgraded at radical prostatectomy, 19 (68%) featured an aneuploid histogram and 9 (32%) were diploid. Nineteen of 28 (68%) of aneuploid low-grade tumors on needle biopsy became high-grade at radical prostatectomy. Nine of 10 (90%) diploid high-grade tumors at needle biopsy became low-grade at radical prostatectomy. Of the 38 cases in which ploidy and grade were incongruous, 28 (74%) had grade shifting. In a multivariate regression analysis, a high-grade Gleason score on radical prostatectomy specimens correlated significantly with needle biopsy ploidy (p = 0.0001) but not with needle biopsy grade (p = 0.15). The sensitivity of the needle biopsy grade in the detection of high-grade tumors on radical prostatectomy was 30%, and the specificity was 86%. The sensitivity of ploidy status in the prediction of high grade at radical prostatectomy was 78%, and the specificity was 96%. With a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >0.4 ng/ml as the indicator of post-radical prostatectomy disease recurrence on a subset of 106 patients, on univariate analysis, disease recurrence was predicted by needle biopsy ploidy (p = 0.001) and radical prostatectomy grade (p = 0.04) but not by needle biopsy grade (p = 0.39). On multivariate analysis, needle biopsy DNA ploidy status independently predicted disease recurrence (p = 0.002), whereas needle biopsy and prostatectomy grade did not. These results indicate that DNA ploidy analysis of needle biopsy specimens of prostate cancer predicts grade shifting, that it is a more sensitive and specific indicator of final tumor grade at radical prostatectomy than is the original needle biopsy grade, and that ploidy status independently predicts postoperative disease recurrence.

Prostate-specific antigen ratio correlates with aggressiveness of histology grades of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To compare prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio to total PSA (tPSA) assay for prostate cancer diagnosis and to study the correlation of PSA ratio with histology grade of prostate cancer.

METHODS

Among 334 selected cases, 136 had benign prostate diseases and 198 had prostate cancer. All cases underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and tissue biopsies within 6 months of their tPSA measurements. All of the tPSA levels taken were between 2 and 20 microg/L. The serum tPSA and free PSA were assayed using the Abbott AxSYM immunoassay system (Abbott Laboratories; Abbott Park, IL, USA). The PSA ratios of patients with prostate cancer were compared to those with benign prostate diseases (BPD) using the Student's t test. Correlation between the histology grades and PSA ratios was calculated by Pearson test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated from sensitivities and specificity of various PSA ratios and tPSA levels.

RESULTS

We found an inverse correlation between PSA ratios and aggressiveness of histology grades (r = -0.995, p < 0.01). The higher the histology grade, the lower the PSA ratio tended to be, and the more sensitive and specific the PSA ratio was in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. No correlation was found between histology grades and tPSA levels. A PSA ratio of 0.25 diagnosed 93% of patients with Gleason score greater than 7 and 83% of all prostate cancer patients. It would have reduced unnecessary biopsies by 23% compared to the tPSA level of 4 microg/L. Sensitivity of PSA ratios was higher and specificity was lower in high tPSA level group than they were in low tPSA level group.

CONCLUSIONS

PSA ratio inversely correlates to aggressiveness of prostate cancer and has a potential to predict histology grade of prostate cancer. PSA ratio improves sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer diagnosis compared to tPSA assay.

Processing fine needle aspirates of prostate carcinomas for standard immunocytochemical studies and in situ apoptosis detection

A method is described for making permanent histological sections of prostate carcinoma material obtained by fine needle aspiration (FNA) under ecography guidance. Smears made from prostate aspirates were used for diagnosis and from the same patient remaining aspirates were expelled into fixative filled microcentrifuge tube. Aspirates were pelleted and further processed to paraffin blocks. Permanent histological sections were obtained and each section was defined as satisfactory when it contained about 200 intact tumor cells. We have used these tumor sections and immunocytochemistry (ICC) procedures to study molecular biological marker expression. The technique described here has proven to be easy to use and offered a fast, reliable and cost-effective method to obtain suitable samples for standard ICC and in situ apoptosis detection from FNA prostate carcinoma. The method should be equally suitable for outpatient use on other tumors in which FNA and ICC or in situ apoptosis detection is likely to be helpful.

Histopathologic review of prostate biopsies from patients referred to a comprehensive cancer center: correlation of pathologic findings, analysis of cost, and impact on treatment

BACKGROUND

Clinicians at the Fox Chase Cancer Center (FCCC) base prostate carcinoma treatment decisions regarding need to treat, field size, total dose, and adjuvant hormonal therapy on known prognostic factors including clinical stage, Gleason score (GS), perineural invasion (PNI), and pretreatment prostate specific antigen levels. The pathology of every patient is reviewed at FCCC to confirm a diagnosis of malignancy. The objective of this study was to define differences between pathologic reviews and their impact on treatment between outside institutions and FCCC.

METHODS

The authors reviewed 538 pathology reports of prostate biopsies performed at both outside pathology departments and FCCC on patients evaluated between January 1993 and December 1996. The outside pathology reviews represented 107 community hospitals, academic institutions, and private pathology laboratories. Patients who had received hormonal therapy, cryosurgery, or radical prostatectomy prior to prostate biopsy were excluded from analysis. Final FCCC pathology determinations were compared with pathology reports from outside institutions. Reports then were analyzed to determine whether differences in interpretation would have resulted in different treatment strategies. Differences in percentages according to institutional type were evaluated using the chi-square statistic. The cost was assessed and cost per change in treatment estimated.

RESULTS

The 538 pathology reviews identified a nearly 40% change in GS and a 13% change in > or =2 GS between the FCCC pathology review and 107 outside academic institutions. The results of this study showed that 22% of community hospitals, 10% of private laboratories, and 8% of academic institutions demonstrated at least 2 GS changes compared with the FCCC pathology review (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference observed between types of institutions in the incidence of PNI.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis provides evidence of a significant difference in the pathologic reviews of prostate biopsies conducted at FCCC and outside pathology departments. There was a nearly 40% change in GS and a 13% change in > or =2 GS between the FCCC pathology review and 107 outside institutions. The second pathology review added approximately $104 per case for a total of $55,952 to review all 538 cases. Overall, the savings in health care dollars resulting from the second pathologic review totaled $12,997. This second review of outside pathology in prostate cancer appears to be justified based on the treatment changes and on cost.

Accuracy of biopsy Gleason scores from a large uropathology laboratory: use of a diagnostic protocol to minimize observer variability

OBJECTIVES

To examine the correlation of biopsy Gleason scores with radical prostatectomy specimens from a laboratory that uses protocols designed to minimize observer variability. This protocol mandates consensus case review of all nonbenign cases.

METHODS

Between August 24, 1993 and June 26, 1997, 106 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland had their prostate cancer diagnosed and graded at one laboratory (DIANON Systems). We analyzed the Gleason scores from the biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.

RESULTS

Exact correlation existed between biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason scores for 72 (68%) cases; 103 (97%) correlated within 1 grade, all cases correlated within 2 grades; 26 (25%) biopsies were undergraded and 8 (8%) were overgraded. Positive predictive values for biopsy Gleason scores 5, 6, and 7 were 66%, 67%, and 71%, respectively. Grouped Gleason scores (well differentiated [2 to 4], moderately differentiated [5, 6], moderately to poorly differentiated [7], and poorly differentiated [8 to 10]) correlated exactly for 74 (70%) cases and within 1 group for all cases. Patient age, digital rectal examination results, total number of positive cores, and maximum percentage of tumor on biopsy did not affect correlation, but prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels did affect correlation (exact correlation 96% when the PSA level was less than 5 ng/mL; 50% when the PSA level was 11 ng/mL or greater, P <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of experience and the protocol described minimizes intra- and interobserver variability, thereby improving the predictive value of biopsy Gleason grading. Biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason scores correlate more poorly when the PSA level is high (11 ng/mL or greater) than when the PSA level is low (less than 5 ng/mL).

Minimal criteria for the diagnosis of prostate cancer on needle biopsy

Increased clinical screening of men at risk for prostate cancer, and the realization of the benefits of performing multiple biopsies per prostate, have facilitated early detection of malignancy, while presenting the pathologist with a growing array of diagnostic findings. Interpretation of these findings requires discussion of the minimal criteria required for the diagnosis of cancer on needle biopsy within a wide spectrum of related histologic findings. This spectrum includes small acinar proliferations suspicious for but not diagnostic of cancer, benign mimics of cancer, the preinvasive entity of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and various treatment effects. Clinical implications of these findings and other prognostic factors are detailed.