Mechanical Power and Development of Ventilator-induced Lung Injury

Open lung approach ventilation abolishes the negative effects of respiratory rate in experimental lung injury

BACKGROUND

We recently reported that a high respiratory rate was associated with less inflammation than a low respiratory rate, but caused more pulmonary edema in a model of ARDS when an ARDSNet ventilatory strategy was used. We hypothesized that an open lung approach (OLA) strategy would neutralize the independent effects of respiratory rate on lung inflammation and edema. This hypothesis was tested in an ARDS model using two clinically relevant respiratory rates during OLA strategy.

METHODS

Twelve piglets were subjected to an experimental model of ARDS and randomized into two groups: LRR (20 breaths/min) and HRR (40 breaths/min). They were mechanically ventilated for 6 h according to an OLA strategy. We assessed respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, and extravascular lung water (EVLW). At the end of the experiment, wet/dry ratio, regional histology, and cytokines were evaluated.

RESULTS

After the ARDS model was established, Cdyn,rs decreased from 21 ± 3.3 to 9.0 ± 1.8 ml/cmH2 O (P < 0.0001). After the lung recruitment maneuver, Cdyn,rs increased to the pre-injury value. During OLA ventilation, no differences in respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, or EVLW were observed between groups. Wet/dry ratio and histological scores were not different between groups. Cytokine quantification was similar and showed a homogeneous distribution throughout the lung in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to previous findings with the ARDSNet strategy, respiratory rate did not influence lung inflammatory response or pulmonary edema during OLA ventilation in experimental ARDS. This indicates that changing the respiratory rate when OLA ventilation is used will not exacerbate lung injury.

Associations between ventilator settings during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory hypoxemia and outcome in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a pooled individual patient data analysis : Mechanical ventilation during ECMO

Purpose

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a rescue therapy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The aim of this study was to evaluate associations between ventilatory settings during ECMO for refractory hypoxemia and outcome in ARDS patients.

Methods

In this individual patient data meta-analysis of observational studies in adult ARDS patients receiving ECMO for refractory hypoxemia, a time-dependent frailty model was used to determine which ventilator settings in the first 3 days of ECMO had an independent association with in-hospital mortality.

Results

Nine studies including 545 patients were included. Initiation of ECMO was accompanied by significant decreases in tidal volume size, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), plateau pressure, and driving pressure (plateau pressure − PEEP) levels, and respiratory rate and minute ventilation, and resulted in higher PaO₂/FiO₂, higher arterial pH and lower PaCO₂ levels. Higher age, male gender and lower body mass index were independently associated with mortality. Driving pressure was the only ventilatory parameter during ECMO that showed an independent association with in-hospital mortality [adjusted HR, 1.06 (95 % CI, 1.03–1.10)].

Conclusion

In this series of ARDS patients receiving ECMO for refractory hypoxemia, driving pressure during ECMO was the only ventilator setting that showed an independent association with in-hospital mortality.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4507-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Airway driving pressure and lung stress in ARDS patients

Background

Lung-protective ventilation strategy suggests the use of low tidal volume, depending on ideal body weight, and adequate levels of PEEP. However, reducing tidal volume according to ideal body weight does not always prevent overstress and overstrain. On the contrary, titrating mechanical ventilation on airway driving pressure, computed as airway pressure changes from PEEP to end-inspiratory plateau pressure, equivalent to the ratio between the tidal volume and compliance of respiratory system, should better reflect lung injury. However, possible changes in chest wall elastance could affect the reliability of airway driving pressure. The aim of this study was to evaluate if airway driving pressure could accurately predict lung stress (the pressure generated into the lung due to PEEP and tidal volume).

Methods

One hundred and fifty ARDS patients were enrolled. At 5 and 15 cmH₂O of PEEP, lung stress, driving pressure, lung and chest wall elastance were measured.

Results

The applied tidal volume (mL/kg of ideal body weight) was not related to lung gas volume (r² = 0.0005 p = 0.772). Patients were divided according to an airway driving pressure lower and equal/higher than 15 cmH₂O (the lower and higher airway driving pressure groups). At both PEEP levels, the higher airway driving pressure group had a significantly higher lung stress, respiratory system and lung elastance compared to the lower airway driving pressure group. Airway driving pressure was significantly related to lung stress (r² = 0.581 p < 0.0001 and r² = 0.353 p < 0.0001 at 5 and 15 cmH₂O of PEEP). For a lung stress of 24 and 26 cmH₂O, the optimal cutoff value for the airway driving pressure were 15.0 cmH₂O (ROC AUC 0.85, 95 % CI = 0.782–0.922); and 16.7 (ROC AUC 0.84, 95 % CI = 0.742–0.936).

Conclusions

Airway driving pressure can detect lung overstress with an acceptable accuracy. However, further studies are needed to establish if these limits could be used for ventilator settings.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1446-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

How ARDS should be treated

The Berlin definition criteria applied at positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cm H2O reasonably predict lung edema and recruitabilty. To maintain viable gas exchange, the mechanical ventilation becomes progressively more risky going from mild to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Tidal volume, driving pressure, flow, and respiratory rate have been identified as causes of ventilation-induced lung injury. Taken together, they represent the mechanical power applied to the lung parenchyma. In an inhomogeneous lung, stress risers locally increase the applied mechanical power. Increasing lung homogeneity by PEEP and prone position decreases the harm of mechanical ventilation, particularly in severe ARDS.