251
|
Mantripragada KC, Hamid F, Shafqat H, Olszewski AJ. Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Gallbladder Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016; 109:djw202. [PMID: 27707843 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djw202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2016] [Accepted: 07/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Management of resected gallbladder cancer relies on single-arm trials and retrospective observations. Our objective was to evaluate adjuvant therapy in a nationwide data set using causal inference methods to address sources of bias. Methods We studied patients with T2-3 or node-positive, nonmetastatic gallbladder cancer, resected with grossly negative margins and reported to the National Cancer Data Base between 2004 and 2011. We defined adjuvant therapy as any chemotherapy within 90 days of surgery, and upfront concurrent chemoradiation as radiation within 14 days of first chemotherapy. After adjusting for missing data and guarantee-time bias, and using propensity score analysis to minimize indication bias, we compared overall survival of patients receiving adjuvant therapies with untreated case subjects. Results Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 28.8% of 4775 patients, and upfront chemoradiation to 13.5%. Treatment was less frequent among patients who were older, patients with comorbidities, and among white Hispanic women. T3 or node-positive disease, microscopically positive margins, or extended resection increased the likelihood of adjuvant therapy. Overall survival at three years was 39.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 38.4% to 41.4%) and was unaffected by adjuvant therapy after adjusting for multiple confounders (hazard ratio = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.92 to 1.10). Patients with T3 or node-positive tumors treated with upfront adjuvant chemoradiation had a modest early survival advantage (absolute difference at two years = 6.8%, 95% CI = 1.1% to 12.6%), but survival curves converged after five years of follow-up. Conclusions The curative potential of current adjuvant therapy in gallbladder cancer is questionable, justifying placebo-controlled investigation of novel chemotherapy combinations or alternative approaches. Chemoradiation may provide a short-term benefit in locally advanced tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalyan C Mantripragada
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.,Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Fatima Hamid
- Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.,Department of Medicine, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Pawtucket, RI, USA
| | - Hammad Shafqat
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Pawtucket, RI, USA
| | - Adam J Olszewski
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.,Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
252
|
Go SI, Kim YS, Hwang IG, Kim EY, Oh SY, Ji JH, Song HN, Park SH, Park JO, Kang JH. Is There a Role for Adjuvant Therapy in R0 Resected Gallbladder Cancer?: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Cancer Res Treat 2016; 48:1274-1285. [PMID: 26875193 PMCID: PMC5080804 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2015.502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2015] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to assess the role of adjuvant therapy in stage I-III gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients who have undergone R0 resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinical data were collected on 441 consecutive patients who underwent R0 resection for stage I-III GBC. Eligible patients were classified into adjuvant therapy and surveillance only groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) between the two groups was performed, adjusting clinical factors. RESULTS In total, 84 and 279 patients treated with adjuvant therapy and followed up with surveillance only, respectively, were included in the analysis. Before PSM, the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was lower in the adjuvant therapy group than in the surveillance only group (50.8% vs. 74.8%, p < 0.001), although there was no statistically significant difference in the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (66.2% vs. 79.5%, p=0.089). After the PSM, baseline characteristics became comparable and there were no differences in the 5-year RFS (50.8% vs. 64.8%, p=0.319) and OS (66.2% vs. 70.4%, p=0.703) rates between the two groups. CONCLUSION The results suggest that fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant therapy is not indicated in stage I-III GBC patients who have undergone R0 resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Se-Il Go
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Young Saing Kim
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| | - In Gyu Hwang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Young Kim
- Department of Radiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| | - Sung Yong Oh
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Jun Ho Ji
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea
| | - Haa-Na Song
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se Hoon Park
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Oh Park
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Hun Kang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
253
|
Dover LL, Oster RA, McDonald AM, DuBay DA, Wang TN, Jacob R. Impact of adjuvant chemoradiation on survival in patients with resectable cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2016; 18:843-850. [PMID: 27542590 PMCID: PMC5061024 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2016] [Revised: 07/06/2016] [Accepted: 07/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ideal adjuvant therapy for resected cholangiocarcinoma remains controversial. National guidelines stratify recommendations based on margin status, though few studies are currently available for reference. METHODS Data was abstracted on all patients with definitive resections of cholangiocarcinoma at our institution between 2000 and 2013. Adjuvant chemoradiation consisted of 45 Gy delivered to elective nodal regions and 50.4-54 Gy to the surgical bed with concurrent fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. Subgroup analyses were performed delineated by margin status. RESULTS Curative resection was performed on 95 patients followed by adjuvant chemoradiation in 23/95 (24%) and observation in 72/95 (76%) with a median follow-up of 21.7 months. For those receiving adjuvant chemoradiation the median overall survival was 30.2 months compared with 26.3 months for those observed (p = 0.0695). In a multivariable model controlling for other prognostic factors, adjuvant chemoradiation was associated with improved disease-free survival (HR 0.50, p = 0.03) and overall survival (HR 0.37, p = 0.004). In multivariable models stratified by margin status, adjuvant chemoradiation was associated with improved overall survival following both margin-negative (HR 0.34, p = 0.035) and margin-positive (HR 0.15, p = 0.003) resections. CONCLUSIONS Overall survival was improved with adjuvant chemoradiation following either margin-negative or margin-positive resections, which is not currently reflected in national guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura L Dover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | - Robert A Oster
- Department of Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Andrew M McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Derek A DuBay
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Thomas N Wang
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Rojymon Jacob
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
254
|
Papa A, Caruso D, Strudel M, Tomao S, Tomao F. Update on Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibition for ovarian cancer treatment. J Transl Med 2016; 14:267. [PMID: 27634150 PMCID: PMC5024442 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-016-1027-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2016] [Accepted: 09/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite standard treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), that involves cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy, and initial high response rates to these, up to 80 % of patients experience relapses with a median progression-free survival of 12-18 months. There remains an urgent need for novel targeted therapies to improve clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer. Of the many targeted therapies currently under evaluation, the most promising strategies developed thus far are antiangiogenic agents and Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Particularly, PARP inhibitors are active in cells that have impaired repair of DNA by the homologous recombination (HR) pathway. Cells with mutated breast related cancer antigens (BRCA) function have HR deficiency, which is also present in a significant proportion of non-BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer ("BRCAness" ovarian cancer). The prevalence of germline BRCA mutations in EOC has historically been estimated to be around 10-15 %. However, recent reports suggest that this may be a gross underestimate, especially in women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). The emergence of the DNA repair pathway as a rational target in various cancers led to the development of the PARP inhibitors. The concept of tumor-selective synthetic lethality heralded the beginning of an eventful decade, culminating in the approval by regulatory authorities both in Europe as a maintenance therapy and in the United States treatment for advanced recurrent disease of the first oral PARP inhibitor, olaparib, for the treatment of BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer patients. Other PARP inhibitors are clearly effective in this disease and, within the next years, the results of ongoing randomized trials will clarify their respective roles. CONCLUSION This review will discuss the different PARP inhibitors in development and the potential use of this class of agents in the future. Moreover, combination strategies involving PARP inhibitors are likely to receive increasing attention. The utility of PARP inhibitors combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy is of doubtful value, because of enhanced toxicity of this combination; while, more promising strategies include the combination with antiangiogenic agents, or with inhibitors of the P13K/AKT pathway and new generation of immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anselmo Papa
- Oncology Unit, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Latina, Italy
| | - Davide Caruso
- Oncology Unit, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Latina, Italy
| | - Martina Strudel
- Oncology Unit, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Latina, Italy
| | - Silverio Tomao
- Oncology Unit, Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Latina, Italy
| | - Federica Tomao
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Policlinico “Umberto I”, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
255
|
Abstract
In this review, the authors present an updated description of gallbladder cancer in 2 sections based on presentation: disease that presents incidentally following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and malignancy that is suspected preoperatively. Elements pertaining to technical aspects of surgical resection provide the critical focus of this review and are discussed in the context of evidence-based literature on gallbladder cancer today.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Motaz Qadan
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
256
|
Valle JW, Borbath I, Khan SA, Huguet F, Gruenberger T, Arnold D. Biliary cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2016; 27:v28-v37. [PMID: 27664259 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 478] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J W Valle
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - I Borbath
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - S A Khan
- Hepatology and Gastroenterology Section, Department of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - F Huguet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tenon Hospital, APHP, University Paris VI, Paris, France
| | - T Gruenberger
- 1st Department of Surgery, Rudolfstiftung Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - D Arnold
- Instituto CUF de Oncologia (I.C.O.), Lisbon, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
257
|
Brunner TB, Seufferlein T. Radiation therapy in cholangiocellular carcinomas. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 30:593-602. [PMID: 27644907 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Accepted: 08/17/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma can arise in all parts of the biliary tract and this has implications for therapy. Surgery is the mainstay of therapy however local relapse is a major problem. Therefore, adjuvant treatment with chemoradiotherapy was tested in trials. The SWOG-S0809 trial regimen of chemoradiotherapy which was tested in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and in gallbladder cancer can currently be regarded as highest level of evidence for this indication. In contrast to adjuvant therapy where only conventionally fractionated radiotherapy plays a role, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) today has become a powerful alternative to chemoradiotherapy for definitive treatment due to the ability to administer higher doses of radiotherapy to improve local control. Sequential combinations with chemotherapy are also frequently employed. Nevertheless, in general cholangiocarcinoma is an orphan disease and future clinical trials will have to improve the available level of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas B Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Thomas Seufferlein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, D-89081, Ulm, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
258
|
Cidon EU. Resectable Cholangiocarcinoma: Reviewing the Role of Adjuvant Strategies. Clin Med Insights Oncol 2016; 10:43-48. [PMID: 27199577 PMCID: PMC4869598 DOI: 10.4137/cmo.s32821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2016] [Revised: 04/13/2016] [Accepted: 04/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma is a very heterogeneous and rare group of neoplasms originating from the perihilar, intra-, or extrahepatic bile duct epithelium. It represents only 3% of gastrointestinal cancers, although their incidence is increasing as its mortality increases. Surgical resection is the only potentially curative option, but unfortunately the resectability rate is low. Overall, these malignancies have got a very poor prognosis with a five-year survival rate of 5-10%. Although the five-year survival rate increases to 25-30% in the cases amenable to surgery, only 10-40% of patients present with resectable disease. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the benefit of adjuvant strategies after surgery to increase the rate of curability. This study reviewed the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable bile duct cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Una Cidon
- Oncology Department, Royal Bournemouth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
259
|
Kim Y, Amini N, Wilson A, Margonis GA, Ethun CG, Poultsides G, Tran T, Idrees K, Isom CA, Fields RC, Krasnick B, Weber SM, Salem A, Martin RCG, Scoggins C, Shen P, Mogal HD, Schmidt C, Beal E, Hatzaras I, Shenoy R, Cardona K, Maithel SK, Pawlik TM. Impact of Chemotherapy and External-Beam Radiation Therapy on Outcomes among Patients with Resected Gallbladder Cancer: A Multi-institutional Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:2998-3008. [PMID: 27169772 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5262-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of adjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) and chemoradiation therapy (cXRT) for the treatment of gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains varied. We sought to define the utilization and effect of adjuvant therapy for patients with GBC. METHODS Using a multi-institutional national database, 291 patients with GBC who underwent curative-intent resection between 2000 and 2015 were included. Patients with metastasis or an R2 margin were excluded. RESULTS Median patient age was 66.6 years. Most patients had a T2 (46.2 %) or T3 (38.6 %) lesion, and 37.8 % of patients had lymph node (LN) metastasis. A total of 186 (63.9 %) patients underwent surgery alone, 61 (21.0 %) received CTx, and 44 (15.1 %) patients received cXRT. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with worse overall survival (OS) included T3/T4 stage [hazard ratio (HR) 1.82], LN-metastasis (HR 1.84), lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.02), perineural invasion (HR 1.42), and R1 surgical margin status (HR 2.06); all P < 0.05). In contrast, receipt of CTx/cXRT was associated with improved OS (CTx, HR 0.38; cXRT, HR 0.26; P < 0.001) compared with surgery alone. Similar results were observed for disease-free survival (DFS) (CTx, HR 0.61; cXRT, HR 0.43; P < 0.05). Of note, only patients with high-risk features, such as AJCC T3/T4 stage (HR 0.41), LN metastasis (HR 0.45), and R1 disease (HR 0.21) (all P < 0.05) derived an OS benefit from CTx/cXRT. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant CTx/cXRT was utilized in 36 % of patients undergoing curative-intent resection for GBC. After adjusted analyses, CTx/cXRT were independently associated with improved long-term outcomes, but the benefit was isolated to only patients with high-risk characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuhree Kim
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Neda Amini
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ana Wilson
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Georgios A Margonis
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Cecilia G Ethun
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - George Poultsides
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Thuy Tran
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kamran Idrees
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Chelsea A Isom
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Ryan C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Bradley Krasnick
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sharon M Weber
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Ahmed Salem
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Robert C G Martin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Charles Scoggins
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Perry Shen
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Harveshp D Mogal
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Carl Schmidt
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Eliza Beal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Rivfka Shenoy
- Department of Surgery, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Cardona
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
260
|
Burkhart RA, Laheru DA, Herman JM, Pawlik TM. Multidisciplinary management and the future of treatment in cholangiocarcinoma. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs 2016. [DOI: 10.1517/21678707.2016.1130618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
261
|
Bridgewater JA, Goodman KA, Kalyan A, Mulcahy MF. Biliary Tract Cancer: Epidemiology, Radiotherapy, and Molecular Profiling. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2016; 35:e194-e203. [PMID: 27249723 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_160831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Biliary tract cancer, or cholangiocarcinoma, arises from the biliary epithelium of the small ducts in the periphery of the liver (intrahepatic) and the main ducts of the hilum (extrahepatic), extending into the gallbladder. The incidence and epidemiology of biliary tract cancer are fluid and complex. It is shown that intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is on the rise in the Western world, and gallbladder cancer is on the decline. Radiation therapy has emerged as an important component of adjuvant therapy for resected disease and definitive therapy for locally advanced disease. The emerging sophisticated techniques of imaging tumors and conformal dose delivery are expanding the indications for radiotherapy in the management of bile duct tumors. As we understand more about the molecular pathways driving biliary tract cancers, targeted therapies are at the forefront of new therapeutic combinations. Understanding the gene expression profile and mutational burden in biliary tract cancer allows us to better discern the pathogenesis and identify promising new developmental therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Bridgewater
- From the UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- From the UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Aparna Kalyan
- From the UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Mary F Mulcahy
- From the UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
262
|
Wang J, Narang AK, Sugar EA, Luber B, Rosati LM, Hsu CC, Fuller CD, Pawlik TM, Miller RC, Czito BG, Tuli R, Crane CH, Ben-Josef E, Thomas CR, Herman JM. Evaluation of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Resected Gallbladder Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22 Suppl 3:S1100-S1106. [PMID: 26224402 PMCID: PMC9671536 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4685-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2015] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The role of adjuvant radiation for gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is uncertain. We combine the experience of six National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers to explore the impact of adjuvant radiation following oncologic resection of GBC. METHODS Patients who underwent extended surgery for GBC at Johns Hopkins, Mayo Clinic, Duke University, Oregon Health & Science University, University of Michigan, and University of Texas MD Anderson between 1985 and 2008 were reviewed. Patients with metastatic disease at surgery, gross residual disease, or missing pathologic information were excluded. RESULTS Of the 112 patients identified, 61 % received adjuvant radiation, 93 % of whom received concurrent chemotherapy. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 47.3 (range 2.2-167.7) months. Patients who received adjuvant radiation had a higher rate of advanced T-stage (57 vs. 16 %, p < 0.01), lymph node involvement (63 vs. 18 %, p < 0.01), and positive microscopic margins (37 vs. 9 %, p < 0.01) compared with patients managed with surgery alone, but overall survival (OS) was comparable between the two cohorts (5-year OS: 49.7 vs. 52.5 %, p = 0.20). Lymph node involvement had the strongest association with poor OS (p < 0.01). Adjuvant radiation was associated with decreased isolated local failure (hazard ratio 0.17, 95 % confidence interval 0.05-0.63, p = 0.01). However, 71 % of recurrences included distant failure. CONCLUSIONS Following oncologic resection for GBC, adjuvant radiation may offer improved local control compared with observation. The benefit of adjuvant radiation beyond chemotherapy alone should therefore be explored. Certainly, the high rate of distant failure highlights the need for more effective systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amol K Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Sugar
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Brandon Luber
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lauren M Rosati
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Charles C Hsu
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- San Francisco School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Uinversity of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Richard Tuli
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Edgar Ben-Josef
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Charles R Thomas
- Uinversity of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
263
|
Adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of gall bladder carcinoma: What is the current evidence. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2015; 28:1-6. [PMID: 26265290 DOI: 10.1016/j.jnci.2015.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2015] [Revised: 07/10/2015] [Accepted: 07/11/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Gall bladder carcinoma (GBC) is considered the fifth most common one of the most aggressive gastro intestinal tract malignancies. Owing to their large incidence randomised controlled trials have hardly been conducted to look into their optimum treatment. Over the years surgical resection has been considered the only curative treatment of these tumors. However, the outcome still remains guarded. The predominant pattern of failure is loco-regional followed by systemic. Hence, local adjuvant radiation has been used by different institutes with concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy. The large retrospective series with their limitations showed improved survival in patients with regional spread or tumors infiltrating the liver when treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. In the present era with modern radiation techniques and target delineation radiation may further improve upon the impact without adding to the toxicity profile. Hence, radiation in gall bladder cancer needs a relook to optimize treatment outcome of such aggressive disease.
Collapse
|
264
|
Affiliation(s)
- Rachna T Shroff
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHouston, TX, USA,Correspondence Rachna T. Shroff, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Tel: + 1 713 792 2828. Fax: + 1 713 745 8620. E-mail:
| | - Jennifer Knox
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer CentreToronto, ON, Canada
| | - Elijah Dixon
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of CalgaryCalgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
265
|
Affiliation(s)
- Robin K Kelley
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center and The Liver Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nabeel Bardeesy
- Centers for Cancer Research and Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
| |
Collapse
|
266
|
Wang SJ, Lemieux A, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Ord CB, Walker GV, Fuller CD, Kim JS, Thomas CR. Nomogram for predicting the benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resected gallbladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:4627-32. [PMID: 22067404 PMCID: PMC3236647 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.33.8020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 155] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2010] [Accepted: 07/18/2011] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resected gallbladder cancer may improve survival for some patients, identifying which patients will benefit remains challenging because of the rarity of this disease. The specific aim of this study was to create a decision aid to help make individualized estimates of the potential survival benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with resected gallbladder cancer. METHODS Patients with resected gallbladder cancer were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) -Medicare database who were diagnosed between 1995 and 2005. Covariates included age, race, sex, stage, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Propensity score weighting was used to balance covariates between treated and untreated groups. Several types of multivariate survival regression models were constructed and compared, including Cox proportional hazards, Weibull, exponential, log-logistic, and lognormal models. Model performance was compared using the Akaike information criterion. The primary end point was overall survival with or without adjuvant chemotherapy or CRT. RESULTS A total of 1,137 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. The lognormal survival model showed the best performance. A Web browser-based nomogram was built from this model to make individualized estimates of survival. The model predicts that certain subsets of patients with at least T2 or N1 disease will gain a survival benefit from adjuvant CRT, and the magnitude of benefit for an individual patient can vary. CONCLUSION A nomogram built from a parametric survival model from the SEER-Medicare database can be used as a decision aid to predict which gallbladder patients may benefit from adjuvant CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Wang
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, 97239-3098, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|