The spinothalamic system targets motor and sensory areas in the cerebral cortex of monkeys

The pain matrix reloaded: a salience detection system for the body

Neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies have shown that nociceptive stimuli elicit responses in an extensive cortical network including somatosensory, insular and cingulate areas, as well as frontal and parietal areas. This network, often referred to as the "pain matrix", is viewed as representing the activity by which the intensity and unpleasantness of the perception elicited by a nociceptive stimulus are represented. However, recent experiments have reported (i) that pain intensity can be dissociated from the magnitude of responses in the "pain matrix", (ii) that the responses in the "pain matrix" are strongly influenced by the context within which the nociceptive stimuli appear, and (iii) that non-nociceptive stimuli can elicit cortical responses with a spatial configuration similar to that of the "pain matrix". For these reasons, we propose an alternative view of the functional significance of this cortical network, in which it reflects a system involved in detecting, orienting attention towards, and reacting to the occurrence of salient sensory events. This cortical network might represent a basic mechanism through which significant events for the body's integrity are detected, regardless of the sensory channel through which these events are conveyed. This function would involve the construction of a multimodal cortical representation of the body and nearby space. Under the assumption that this network acts as a defensive system signaling potentially damaging threats for the body, emphasis is no longer on the quality of the sensation elicited by noxious stimuli but on the action prompted by the occurrence of potential threats.

[Nociceptive system : Nociceptors, fiber types, spinal pathways, and projection areas]

In order to transform a nociceptive stimulus into a painful perception, a highly specialized chain of structural and functional elements is necessary. This system comprises nociceptors in the periphery with specific molecular properties for differential coding of noxious submodalities, ascending and descending tracts that can control the input into the dorsal horn of the spinal cord as well as supraspinal processing that regulates the integration of nociceptive information with other sensory modalities and autonomic function. In this article, structures involved in nociceptive signal processing starting from the periphery up to spinal and cerebral structures are discussed in the order of their spatio-temporal activation sequence - as far as these are known. Already from the basis of the different receptor subtypes found on the thinly or unmyelinated nerve fibers in the periphery, the predominant principle of polymodality is demonstrated. Different input to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord by different nerve fiber populations to superficial and deep layers is explained, ascending tracts as well as descending systems capable of either facilitating or inhibiting the upstream flow of nociceptive information, together with their known transmitters. Finally, thalamic relay nuclei for sensory and nociceptive signals, as well as subcortical and cortical projection targets are discussed. To complete the current view of the nociceptive system, information from molecular biology and anatomic tracing studies as well as data from functional electrophysiologic cell recordings in animals and imaging studies in humans are assembled.

Multiple somatotopic representations of heat and mechanical pain in the operculo-insular cortex: a high-resolution fMRI study

Whereas studies of somatotopic representation of touch have been useful to distinguish multiple somatosensory areas within primary (SI) and secondary (SII) somatosensory cortex regions, no such analysis exists for the representation of pain across nociceptive modalities. Here we investigated somatotopy in the operculo-insular cortex with noxious heat and pinprick stimuli in 11 healthy subjects using high-resolution (2 × 2 × 4 mm) 3T functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Heat stimuli (delivered using a laser) and pinprick stimuli (delivered using a punctate probe) were directed to the dorsum of the right hand and foot in a balanced design. Locations of the peak fMRI responses were compared between stimulation sites (hand vs. foot) and modalities (heat vs. pinprick) within four bilateral regions of interest: anterior and posterior insula and frontal and parietal operculum. Importantly, all analyses were performed on individual, non-normalized fMRI images. For heat stimuli, we found hand-foot somatotopy in the contralateral anterior and posterior insula [hand, 9 ± 10 (SD) mm anterior to foot, P < 0.05] and in the contralateral parietal operculum (SII; hand, 7 ± 10 mm lateral to foot, P < 0.05). For pinprick stimuli, we also found somatotopy in the contralateral posterior insula (hand, 9 ± 10 mm anterior to foot, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the response to heat stimulation of the hand was 11 ± 12 mm anterior to the response to pinprick stimulation of the hand in the contralateral (left) anterior insula (P < 0.05). These results indicate the existence of multiple somatotopic representations for pain within the operculo-insular region in humans, possibly reflecting its importance as a sensory-integration site that directs emotional responses and behavior appropriately depending on the body site being injured.

Operculo-insular pain (parasylvian pain): a distinct central pain syndrome

Central pain with dissociated thermoalgesic sensory loss is common in spinal and brainstem syndromes but not in cortical lesions. Out of a series of 270 patients investigated because of somatosensory abnormalities, we identified five subjects presenting with central pain and pure thermoalgesic sensory loss contralateral to cortical stroke. All of the patients had involvement of the posterior insula and inner parietal operculum. Lemniscal sensory modalities (position sense, graphaestesia, stereognosis) and somatosensory evoked potentials to non-noxious inputs were always preserved, while thermal and pain sensations were profoundly altered, and laser-evoked potentials to thermo-nocoiceptive stimuli were always abnormal. Central pain resulting from posterior parasylvian lesions appears to be a distinct entity that can be identified unambiguously on the basis of clinical, radiological and electrophysiological data. It presents with predominant or isolated deficits for pain and temperature sensations, and is paradoxically closer to pain syndromes from brainstem lesions affecting selectively the spinothalamic pathways than to those caused by focal lesions of the posterior thalamus. The term 'pseudo-thalamic' is therefore inappropriate to describe it, and we propose parasylvian or operculo-insular pain as appropriate labels. Parasylvian pain may be extremely difficult to treat; the magnitude of pain-temperature sensory disturbances may be prognostic for its development, hence the importance of early sensory assessment with quantitative methods.

From the neuromatrix to the pain matrix (and back)

Pain is a conscious experience, crucial for survival. To investigate the neural basis of pain perception in humans, a large number of investigators apply noxious stimuli to the body of volunteers while sampling brain activity using different functional neuroimaging techniques. These responses have been shown to originate from an extensive network of brain regions, which has been christened the Pain Matrix and is often considered to represent a unique cerebral signature for pain perception. As a consequence, the Pain Matrix is often used to understand the neural mechanisms of pain in health and disease. Because the interpretation of a great number of experimental studies relies on the assumption that the brain responses elicited by nociceptive stimuli reflect the activity of a cortical network that is at least partially specific for pain, it appears crucial to ascertain whether this notion is supported by unequivocal experimental evidence. Here, we will review the original concept of the "Neuromatrix" as it was initially proposed by Melzack and its subsequent transformation into a pain-specific matrix. Through a critical discussion of the evidence in favor and against this concept of pain specificity, we show that the fraction of the neuronal activity measured using currently available macroscopic functional neuroimaging techniques (e.g., EEG, MEG, fMRI, PET) in response to transient nociceptive stimulation is likely to be largely unspecific for nociception.