The blood-spinal cord barrier: morphology and clinical implications

Spinal cord markers in ALS: diagnostic and biomarker considerations

Despite considerable involvement of the spinal cord in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), current biomarker research is primarily centred on brain imaging and CSF proteomics. In clinical practice, spinal cord imaging in ALS is performed primarily to rule out alternative conditions in the diagnostic phase of the disease. Quantitative spinal cord imaging has traditionally been regarded as challenging, as it requires high spatial resolution while minimizing partial volume effects, physiological motion and susceptibility distortions. In recent years however, as acquisition and post-processing methods have been perfected, a number of exciting and promising quantitative spinal imaging and electrophysiology techniques have been developed. We performed a systematic review of the trends, methodologies, limitations and conclusions of recent spinal cord studies in ALS to explore the diagnostic and prognostic potential of spinal markers. Novel corrective techniques for quantitative spinal cord imaging are systematically reviewed. Recent findings demonstrate that imaging techniques previously used in brain imaging, such as diffusion tensor, functional and metabolic imaging can now be successfully applied to the human spinal cord. Optimized electrophysiological approaches make the non-invasive assessment of corticospinal pathways possible, and multimodal spinal techniques are likely to increase the specificity and sensitivity of proposed spinal markers. In conclusion, spinal cord imaging is an emerging area of ALS biomarker research. Novel quantitative spinal modalities have already been successfully used in ALS animal models and have the potential for development into sensitive ALS biomarkers in humans.

Neural regenerative strategies incorporating biomolecular axon guidance signals

There are currently no acceptable cures for central nervous system injuries, and damage induced large gaps in the peripheral nervous system have been challenging to bridge to restore neural functionality. Innervation by neurons is made possible by the growth cone. This dynamic structure is unique to neurons, and can directly sense physical and chemical activity in its environment, utilizing these cues to propel axons to precisely reach their targets. Guidance can occur through chemoattractive factors such as neurotrophins and netrins, chemorepulsive agents like semaphorins and slits, or contact-mediated molecules such as ephrins and those located in the extracellular matrix. The understanding of biomolecular activity during nervous system development and injury has generated new techniques and tactics for improving and restoring function to the nervous system after injury. This review will focus on the major neuronal guidance molecules and their utility in current tissue engineering and neural regenerative strategies.

Vascular disruption and the role of angiogenic proteins after spinal cord injury

Spinal cord injuries (SCI) can result in devastating paralysis, for which there is currently no robustly efficacious neuroprotective/neuroregenerative treatment. When the spinal cord is subjected to a traumatic injury, the local vasculature is disrupted and the blood–spinal cord barrier is compromised. Subsequent inflammation and ischemia may then contribute to further secondary damage, exacerbating neurological deficits. Therefore, understanding the vascular response to SCI and the molecular elements that regulate angiogenesis has considerable relevance from a therapeutic standpoint. In this paper, we review the nature of vascular damage after traumatic SCI and what is known about the role that angiogenic proteins—angiopoietin 1 (Ang1), angiopoietin 2 (Ang2) and angiogenin—may play in the subsequent response. To this, we add recent work that we have conducted in measuring these proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum after acute SCI in human patients. Intrathecal catheters were installed in 15 acute SCI patients within 48 h of injury. CSF and serum samples were collected over the following 3–5 days and analysed for Ang1, Ang2 and angiogenin protein levels using a standard ELISA technique. This represents the first description of the endogenous expression of these proteins in an acute human SCI setting.