Radiotherapy in breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: first results of the EORTC randomised phase III trial 10853. EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group

[Ductal in situ carcinoma: is it ethical to consider the breast conserving therapy as a standard?]

The increasing incidence of DCIS during the past 20 years needs a continuous evaluation of the treatment strategies and a multidisciplinary decision process. The management of the DCIS remains a challenging issue in 2003. Mastectomy should still be considered as the reference treatment which is able to guarantee cure in almost all cases, whereas breast conserving surgery followed by radiation therapy is associated with 7-10% of local recurrence. However, the increasing knowledge of the predictive factors of the local recurrence allows to propose a conservative treatment strategy to a large amount of patients, without negative impact on their prognosis. This review presents the arguments that permit to justify the reasoned choice of the different therapeutic options according to the clinico-pathological situations.

High nuclear grade and negative estrogen receptor are significant risk factors for recurrence in DCIS

INTRODUCTION

Recommendations for adjuvant treatment of DCIS after breast conservation are controversial. We tried to identify further risk factors in a retrospective study of our own practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred and thirty-two patients treated by breast conservation between 1978 and 2001 at the Department of General Surgery, University of Vienna were analysed. Tumour size, nuclear grade, hormone receptors, p53, her-2/neu, multifocality, microinvasion and post-operative therapy (irradiation, tamoxifen or combination) were analysed for their influence on breast recurrence.

RESULTS

Overall recurrence rate was 6.1% (8/132). For patients with DCIS showing high nuclear grade or negative estrogen receptor the risk for development of ipsilateral breast recurrence is significantly higher. Newer factors like p53 and her-2/neu do not have any prognostic significance. No recurrence was observed in patients treated by post-operative irradiation and tamoxifen.

CONCLUSION

Nuclear grade remains the most significant factor for breast recurrence after DCIS. Hormone receptor status identifies a subset of patients with more favourable prognosis.

Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast

BACKGROUND

An increase in incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has been documented, and concerns regarding overly aggressive treatment have been raised. This study was designed to evaluate the use of surgery and radiation therapy in treating DCIS.

METHODS

We used the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to assess treatment of patients with DCIS with no evidence of microinvasion who were diagnosed from January 1, 1992, through December 31, 1999. We assessed the rates of mastectomy, breast reconstruction, radiation therapy after lumpectomy, and axillary dissection. Associations were analyzed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

During the study period, 25 206 patients met selection criteria. The incidence of DCIS dramatically increased with time; however, the incidence of comedo lesions did not change. The rate of mastectomy decreased from 43% in 1992 to 28% in 1999, after controlling for age, race, tumor size, comedo histology, and geographic location. However, because of the increase in the diagnosis of DCIS, the age-adjusted incidence of mastectomy for DCIS in the population did not change (7.8 per 100 000 women in 1992 and 1999). Almost half the patients undergoing lumpectomy did not undergo radiation therapy (55% in 1992 and 46% in 1999); in those with comedo histology, 33% did not undergo radiation therapy after lumpectomy, even in 1999. Overall, patients were less likely to have axillary dissection over time (34% in 1992 versus 15% in 1999), yet the rate of axillary dissection was still high (30%) in patients undergoing mastectomy in 1999. Large, statistically and clinically significant variation by geographic location was found in treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of DCIS changed in a clinically significant fashion between 1992 and 1999. Throughout this study, many patients were found to undergo aggressive surgical therapy, including mastectomy and axillary dissection, whereas others appeared to be undertreated, e.g., not receiving radiation therapy after lumpectomy, even in the presence of adverse histologic features. Variation in demographic and geographic factors indicates that at least some of these treatment differences reflect individual and institutional practice patterns that may be modifiable.

Diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a preinvasive form of breast cancer that has increased in incidence over the past 25 years, primarily as a result of mammographically detected microcalcifications. Inadequately treated DCIS carries a risk for evolving into the malignant phenotype; however, the magnitude and timeline for this risk are poorly defined. Treatment options include lumpectomy with or without breast irradiation and mastectomy. The overall survival rate is 96% to 98% with any of these strategies, but the risk of local recurrence (LR) is highest after lumpectomy alone. Breast irradiation can reduce this risk from levels in excess of 40% to 10% over a 10-year follow-up period. Approximately 50% of all LR from DCIS are invasive lesions. Therefore, the occurrence of a LR after breast-conserving therapy is a potentially greater threat to the patient with DCIS compared to the patient diagnosed with invasive cancer. In patients diagnosed with invasive cancer, the risk of micrometastatic disease is present from the time of initial diagnosis. In patients with DCIS, the expectation is that a potentially 100% cure rate should be achieved with local therapy alone. Although most DCIS cases complicated by LR will be successfully salvaged with prolonged overall survival, it is critically important to take every precaution that will minimize the risk of locally recurrent disease. Therefore, radiation therapy as an adjunct to lumpectomy is essential. A subset of patients with DCIS with low-volume low-grade disease who can be safely treated by lumpectomy alone has not yet been clearly defined. Prospective studies designed to identify this category are ongoing. Inadequate margin control is the most consistent risk factor for LR that has been reported thus far, but there is no universally accepted definition for what constitutes an optimal negative margin distance. Young age at diagnosis, high nuclear grade, and comedonecrosis are other factors that have been implicated as increasing the risk for LR. Tamoxifen can further decrease the rate of new in-breast events on the affected side and in the contralateral breast. Ongoing trials will also define the role of aromatase inhibitors as a risk-reducing strategy.

Applying the neoadjuvant paradigm to ductal carcinoma in situ

Local treatment options for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are virtually identical to those for early invasive breast cancer, despite the fact that the survival from this condition is much higher. Our ability to more appropriately tailor therapy for DCIS is hampered by a lack of understanding of the natural history of DCIS, our limited ability to predict the rate of progression to invasive cancer and the response to therapy, and the absence of tools to follow patients who have not had invasive treatments. Neoadjuvant therapy, which has been proven to be both safe and effective in tailoring treatments for invasive cancer, could be ideally suited to DCIS. However, neoadjuvant therapy requires that doctors and patients delay surgical treatment that has known benefits. In order to successfully introduce this approach into clinical practice, risk assessment and decision support tools will be needed to help physicians and patients feel comfortable that they are not being exposed to unnecessary or excessive risk. In addition, we need better imaging to track extent and progression of disease. Among the possible benefits of the neoadjuvant approach, we may discover that many lesions are responsive and some even reversible, leaving us with treatments that might be tailored to biology and with important clues for breast cancer prevention in high-risk women.

Carcinome canalaire in situ du sein

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses the results of "current clinical practice" among 882 women treated in nine French Cancer Centers from 1985 to 1995 for pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.

METHOD

Median age was 53 years (range 21-87); 177 (20%) patients underwent mastectomy (M), 190 (22%) conservative surgery alone (CS) and 515 (58%) conservative surgery with radiotherapy (CS + RT).

RESULTS

The crude 7-year local relapse (LR) rates were 2%, 31% and 13% among the M, CS and CS+RT subgroups (p<0.0001). All four LR after M were invasive as well as 31 (52%) out of 59 and 40 (61%) out of 66 in the CS and CS+RT groups. Distant metastases occurred in 1%, 3% and 1% of the three treatment groups. No LR factors were found in the M group. Among women treated with CS, the 7-year LR rates were 36%, 31% and 30% among women aged 40 or less, 41 to 60 and 61 or more (NS). For women treated by CS+RT, the LR rates in these age subgroups were 33%, 13% and 8%, respectively (p<0.0001). Patients with negative, positive or uncertain margins had 7-year LR rates of 26%, 56% and 29% respectively if treated with CS (p=0.02) and 11%, 23% and 9% if treated with CS+RT (p=0.0008). RT reduced LR rates by 65% in all histological subgroups, but more particularly in comedocarcinoma and mixed cribriform/papillary subgroups. The 7-year rate of contralateral breast cancer was 7%, identical in all subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Mastectomy remains the safest treatment for women with DCIS, with a 98% 7-year control rate. After conservative surgery, RT reduces very significantly LR rates, according to the NSABP B-17 and EORTC 10853 randomized trial results. The RT benefit is present in all clinical/histological subgroups, but its magnitude varies. Young age (<40 years) and incomplete excision are the most important LR risk factors.

Ductal carcinoma in situ: USC/Van Nuys Prognostic Index and the impact of margin status

As our knowledge of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) continues to evolve, treatment decision-making has become increasingly complex and controversial for both patients and physicians. Treatment options include mastectomy, and breast conservation with or without radiation therapy. Data produced from the randomized clinical trials for DCIS has provided the basis for important treatment recommendations, but are not without limitations. In this article, we review our prospectively collected database consisting of 1036 patients with DCIS treated at the Van Nuys Breast Center and the USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center. We review the use of the USC/Van Nuys Prognostic Index, a clinical algorithm designed to assist physicians in selection of appropriate treatments, and examine the impact of margin status as a sole predictor of local recurrence.

Local and national trends over a decade in the surgical treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ

BACKGROUND

Ductal cancer in situ (DCIS) is an increasingly frequent diagnosis in breast cancer, and management continues to challenge surgeons and oncologists. The purpose of our study was to examine local and national rates of breast conservation surgery and breast reconstruction surgery and to explore patient and surgeon factors associated with the procedures.

METHODS

Review of the 1,342 patients in our institutional breast cancer database yielded 211 patients with DCIS. The sample of 211 patients was compared with a national (Nationwide Inpatient Sample [NIS]) database. Patient and surgeon factors associated with the use of breast conservative surgery (BCS) and breast reconstruction (BR) postmastectomy were identified.

RESULTS

At our institution, the use of BCS steadily increased over ten years. Younger women with nonpalpable tumors, nonprivate insurance, and younger surgeons were more likely to have BCS. In 28 patients, breast reconstruction was performed: younger Caucasian women with private insurance and younger surgeons were more likely to undergo reconstruction. NIS data revealed that BCS was performed in 20% but that BCS did not increase over the 12-year period.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a steady increase in the use of BCS for DCIS at our institution, but a consistent, and much lower, use nationally. To increase breast conservation and reconstruction for DCIS, educational efforts should especially be directed toward elderly women and elderly surgeons.

Ductal carcinoma in situ: surgery and radiotherapy

As a consequence of mammographic breast screening programmes, ductal carcinoma in situ is diagnosed with increasing frequency. There are widely disparate philosophies concerning diagnosis, classification and treatment. This review discusses the management of DCIS in light of the new data from randomised trials.

Optimal management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents a breast lesion that is diagnosed with increasing frequency, mainly due to the wide use of screening mammography. Today, DCIS comprises 15-25% of all breast cancers detected at population screening programs. Consequently, the concepts of properly managing such patients assume a greater importance in everyday practice. Mammographically detected microcalcifications are the most common presentation of DCIS. Despite recent technological advances (including Stereotactic-guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy), mammographically guided wire biopsy remains the "gold-standard" for obtaining a histological diagnosis in patients with non-palpable, mammographically detected DCIS. Management options include mastectomy, local excision combined with radiation therapy, and local excision alone. Given that DCIS is a heterogeneous group of lesions rather than a single entity, and because patients have a wide variety of personal needs that must be addressed during treatment selection, it is obvious that no single approach will be appropriate for all forms of DCIS or for all patients. Careful patient selection is of key importance in order to achieve the best results in the management of the individual patient with DCIS. Axillary lymph node dissection is unnecessary in the treatment of pure DCIS, but it is indicated when microinvasion is present. In these cases, sentinel lymph node biopsy may be an excellent alternative. In the NSABP B-24 trial, tamoxifen reduced both the invasive and non-invasive breast cancer events in either breast by 37%. Nearly all patients who develop a non-invasive recurrence following breast-sparing surgery are cured with mastectomy, and approximately 75% of those with an invasive recurrence are salvaged. Selected patients initially treated by lumpectomy alone may also undergo breast-conservation therapy at the time of relapse according to the same strict guidelines of tumor margin clearance required for the primary lesion; radiation therapy should be given following local excision. The use of systemic therapy in patients with invasive recurrence should be based on standard criteria for invasive breast cancer.

The risk of a contralateral breast cancer among women diagnosed with ductal and lobular breast carcinoma in situ: data from the Connecticut Tumor Registry

BACKGROUND

Women diagnosed with breast carcinoma in situ are at increased risk for developing a contralateral breast cancer. The magnitude of this risk and the relationship between this risk and age, time since diagnosis, histologic subtype, and treatment for the first breast cancer is continuing to be defined.

METHODS

The risk of developing a contralateral breast cancer is examined among 4198 women diagnosed with breast carcinoma in situ and reported to the Connecticut Tumor Registry (CTR) between January 1, 1975 and March 14, 1998 using Kaplan-Meier estimation. A Cox proportional hazards model is used to assess the effect of surgical treatment, radiation therapy, age at diagnosis, race, histology, marital status, anatomic location within the breast, and time since diagnosis upon this risk.

RESULTS

The cumulative 5- and 10-year probabilities of being diagnosed with a contralateral breast cancer among women initially diagnosed with a ductal breast carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were 4.3% (95% confidence interval, 3.6-5.0%) and 6.8% (95% confidence interval, 5.5-8.2%), respectively. These risks are 3.35 times greater than those for women without a history of breast cancer but are similar to those for women diagnosed with non-metastatic invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast. The cumulative 5- and 10-year probabilities of being diagnosed with a contralateral breast cancer among women initially diagnosed with a lobular breast carcinoma in situ (LCIS) were 11.9% (95% confidence interval, 9.5-14.3%) and 13.9% (95% confidence interval, 11.0-16.8%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Women diagnosed with LCIS were 2.6 (95% confidence interval, 2.0-3.4%) times more likely than women with DCIS to be diagnosed with a contralateral breast cancer within the first six months of the first breast primary. The risk of developing a contralateral breast cancer more than 6 months after the initial breast cancer was independent of surgical or radiation therapy, time since diagnosis, age at diagnosis, histology, race, marital status, or anatomic location of the cancer within the breast.

The University of Southern California/Van Nuys prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

BACKGROUND

The original Van Nuys prognostic index (VNPI) was introduced in 1996 as an aid to the complex treatment decision-making process for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. This update adds patient age to the previous predictors of local recurrence in breast preservation patients.

METHODS

A prospective database consisting of 706 conservatively patients with DCIS was examined using multivariate analysis. Four independent predictors of local recurrence (tumor size, margin width, pathologic classification, and age) were used to derive a new formula for the University of Southern California (USC)/VNPI.

RESULTS

In all, 706 patients with pure DCIS were treated with breast preservation. There was no statistical difference in the 12-year local recurrence-free survival in patients with USC/VNPI scores of 4, 5, or 6, regardless of whether or not radiation therapy was used (P = not significant). Patients with USC/VNPI scores of 7, 8, or 9 received a statistically significant average 12% to 15% local recurrence-free survival benefit when treated with radiation therapy (P = 0.03). Patients with scores of 10, 11, or 12, although showing the greatest absolute benefit from radiation therapy, experienced local recurrence rates of almost 50% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Ductal carcinoma in situ patients with USC/VNPI scores of 4, 5 or 6 can be considered for treatment with excision only. Patients with intermediate scores (7, 8, or 9) should be considered for treatment with radiation therapy or be reexcised if margin width is less than 10 mm and cosmetically feasible. Patients with USC/VNPI scores of 10, 11, or 12 exhibit extremely high local recurrence rates, regardless of irradiation, and should be considered for mastectomy, generally with immediate reconstruction or reexcision if technically possible.

The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: problems associated with management of pre-invasive lesions

The treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) involves adequate surgical excision with adjuvant radiotherapy where appropriate. An inadequate excision margin and young age are independent risk factors for local recurrence. Routine surgery to axillary lymph nodes is not recommended in pure DCIS. In localised DCIS, adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended on the basis of tumour size, margin width and pathological subtypes. The role of adjuvant tamoxifen as systemic therapy is controversial. The treatment of atypical ductal/lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ involves surgical excision to exclude coexisting DCIS or invasive disease.

Ductal carcinoma in situ

DCIS is a heterogeneous disease whose natural history is poorly defined. Screening mammography has increased the detection rate of DCIS, but we remain unable to identify cases of DCIS that will not progress to invasive carcinoma during an individual's lifetime. Genomics holds great promise in this regard, but prospective studies with long-term follow-up will be needed before concluding that a subset of DCIS is clinically insignificant. The varying intensity of treatment options for DCIS, ranging from mastectomy to excision, RT, and tamoxifen to excision alone, reflects the uncertainty about the natural history of DCIS as well as differing physician values regarding the impact of local recurrence. The extent of DCIS within the breast is the major determinant of whether the patient is a candidate for a breast-conserving approach, and contraindications to the use of breast conservation treatment and to the use of irradiation have been defined. The clinical decision-making process in DCIS would benefit greatly from improvements in our ability to convey information about the long-term risks and benefits of therapy, as well as the tradeoffs in health-related quality of life, to patients, and to incorporate their preferences into the decision-making process.

Biological response to hormonal manipulation in oestrogen receptor positive ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Adjuvant antioestrogen therapy with tamoxifen is recommended for all women following breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to reduce local recurrence, despite 50% of lesions being oestrogen receptor (OR) negative. We have investigated the response to hormone manipulation in DCIS by studying changes in epithelial proliferation and progesterone receptor (PR) expression as surrogate molecular markers of treatment effects in DCIS of known OR status. Women were identified who had undergone diagnostic core biopsy followed by surgery for DCIS 14-41 days later. Ki67 (a measure of epithelial cell proliferation) and PR expression were determined by immunohistochemistry on paired paraffin sections of the core biopsy and operative specimens for each patient, with OR and HER-2 measured on the operative specimen. Women were divided into three groups according to whether they had changed hormone therapy (stopped hormone replacement therapy (HRT), group 1), continued taking HRT (group 2) or were not taking HRT (group 3) between core biopsy and surgery. In OR-positive (but not in OR-negative) DCIS after oestrogen withdrawal (group 1), a fall in the mean cell proliferation (P&<0.01) was observed. A fall in PR expression between core biopsy and surgery was also seen in this group (P=0.02). No change in either mean cell proliferation or PR expression was seen in the other two groups in OR-positive or -negative DCIS. The fall in proliferation and PR expression occurred regardless of HER-2 status. In conclusion, a biological response to hormone manipulation is only seen in OR-positive DCIS tumours. Any clinical value of antioestrogen therapy is likely to be restricted to this group.

Risk of second primary cancer in the contralateral breast in women treated for early-stage breast cancer: a population-based study

PURPOSE

To study the potential risk factors, including radiotherapy (RT) for contralateral breast cancer (CBC), in patients treated for early-stage breast cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1973-1996) was used to study the incidence of CBC after breast cancer. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of CBC, with adjustment for confounders, including age, race, histologic subtype, and use of RT. Information on the use of hormonal therapy and chemotherapy was not available in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

RESULTS

A CBC was documented in 5679 (4.2%) of the 134501 localized invasive or intraductal breast cancer patients surviving at least 3 months. The 10- and 20-year actuarial rate of CBC was 6.1% and 12%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, medullary carcinoma (RR = 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.37), black race (RR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.08-1.33), and age >55 years at initial diagnosis (RR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.08-1.22) were associated with increased CBC risk. A total of 1234 (3.3%) of 37,379 patients who received RT developed CBC, and 4445 (4.6%) of 97122 patients who did not receive RT developed CBC. Overall, RT was not associated with an increased risk of CBC (RR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.97-1.10) in multivariate analysis. The CBC risk associated with RT varied substantially with the length of follow-up. During the first 5 years of follow-up, RT was not associated with an increased CBC risk (age-adjusted RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.88-1.04). For patients surviving for >5 years, RT was associated with a 14% increase in CBC risk (RR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.26). The increased CBC risk with RT was evident in patients aged <45 years (RR = 1.32, p = 0.01) and >55 years (RR = 1.15, p = 0.04) at initial diagnosis. The 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year actuarial rate of CBC was 2.9%, 6.5%, 10.2%, and 13.4%, respectively, for patients with RT; the corresponding rates were 3.0%, 6.0%, 8.9%, and 11.8% for patients without RT. The absolute increase in CBC risk associated with RT was 0.5%, 1.3%, and 1.6% in the 10-, 15-, and 20-year actuarial rate, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CBC is not uncommon after breast cancer, especially for certain subsets of patients. RT was associated with a very small increased long-term CBC risk. This minimal increase in CBC risk should not affect clinical decision-making in treatment selection for patients with localized invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ. Unnecessary radiation exposure to the contralateral breast should be avoided for all patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Radiotherapy and tamoxifen in women with completely excised ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand: randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

As a consequence of mammographic breast screening programmes, ductal carcinoma in situ is diagnosed with increasing frequency. Mastectomy for localised ductal carcinoma in situ is thought to be an over-treatment by many physicians, but there is much controversy as to whether complete local excision alone is sufficient. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of adjuvant radiotherapy and tamoxifen.

METHODS

We used a 2x2 factorial design in a randomised controlled trial. Between May, 1990, and August, 1998, 1701 patients recruited from screening programmes were randomised to both treatments in combination or singly, or to none, or to either one (eg, radiotherapy) with an elective decision to give or to withhold the other (ie, in this case tamoxifen). Patients had complete surgical excision of the lesion confirmed by specimen radiography and histology. Patients have been followed up at least once a year. Median follow-up was 52.6 (range 2.4-118.3) months. Our primary endpoint was the incidence of ipsilateral invasive disease.

FINDINGS

Ipsilateral invasive disease was not reduced by tamoxifen but recurrence of overall ductal carcinoma in situ was decreased (hazard ratio 0.68 [0.49-0.96]; p=0.03). Radiotherapy reduced the incidence of ipsilateral invasive disease (0.45 [0.24-0.85]; p=0.01) and ipsilateral ductal carcinoma in situ (0.36 [0.19-0.66]; p=0.0004), but there was no effect on the occurrence of contralateral disease. There was no evidence of interaction between radiotherapy and tamoxifen.

INTERPRETATION

Radiotherapy can be recommended for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by complete local excision; however, there is little evidence for the use of tamoxifen in these women.

Loss of expression of the putative tumor suppressor NES1 gene in biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ predicts for invasive carcinoma at definitive surgery

PURPOSE

The loss of expression of NES1, a novel putative tumor suppressor gene, is an early marker of breast tumorigenesis. NES1 is expressed in normal breast tissue and ductal hyperplasia but is absent or markedly diminished in invasive cancer. In cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), NES1 expression has been shown previously to be present in approximately 50% of specimens. This study examined the expression level of NES1 in diagnostic biopsy samples found to contain pure DCIS. These data were then correlated with the pathologic findings found at definitive local surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-nine cases with initial biopsy showing DCIS without invasive carcinoma followed by subsequent reexcision were discovered and archived. Formalin-fixed tissue specimens were obtained for analysis. Each biopsy specimen was subjected to hematoxylin-eosin staining and reviewed by two pathologists to confirm the diagnosis of pure DCIS. NES1 cDNA (1069 bp), including 238 bp of 5' and 3' untranslated region and the entire protein-coding region, was cloned into a vector. To generate the antisense and sense RNA probes, the plasmid was linearized and the transcription reaction was carried out with polymerases T7 and T3, respectively. The detection of in situ hybridization probes was performed using an mRNAlocator-Biotin Kit. Staining was characterized as negative (0/1+) or positive (2+/3+). Subsequent to an initial biopsy diagnosis of DCIS, all cases had a definitive surgical procedure. Detailed sectioning of the resultant tissue was performed and subjected to hematoxylin-eosin staining to determine the presence or absence of invasive carcinoma.

RESULTS

The initial diagnostic biopsy specimens showed that 17 of 17 high-grade, 3 of 7 intermediate-grade, and 3 of 5 low-grade DCIS specimens were negative for NES1 expression. Of the 6 cases of DCIS found to be positive for NES1 expression, none (0%) were subsequently found to have invasive carcinoma at definitive surgery. In contrast, the loss of NES1 expression in the initial diagnostic biopsy was associated with a 40% incidence of invasive carcinoma at definitive surgery. Additional stratification by nuclear grade showed invasive carcinoma in 5 (83%) of 6 NES1-negative, low- to intermediate-grade DCIS (p </=0.01) and 4 (24%) of 17 NES1-negative, high-grade DCIS (p </=0.05).

CONCLUSION

These results show that a lack of NES1 expression in DCIS identified at the diagnostic biopsy predicts for a high risk of invasive cancer in the definitive surgical specimen. The predictive value of NES1 expression appears to be particularly relevant for low- and intermediate-grade DCIS.

Conservative management of Paget disease of the breast with radiotherapy: 10- and 15-year results

BACKGROUND

At 5-year follow-up, patients with Paget disease of the breast who were treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy (RT) had excellent results. The current report provides 10- and 15-year rates of tumor control in the breast, as well as disease-free and overall survival rates following BCS and RT in a cohort of patients with Paget disease presenting without a palpable mass or mammographic density.

METHODS

Through a collaborative review of patients treated with BCS and RT from seven institutions, 38 cases of Paget disease of the breast presenting without a palpable mass or mammographic density were identified. All patients had pathologic confirmation of typical Paget cells at time of diagnosis. Thirty-six of 38 patients had a minimum follow-up greater than 12 months and constitute the study cohort. Ninety-four percent of patients underwent complete or partial excision of the nipple-areola complex and all patients received a median external beam irradiation dose of 50 Gy (range, 45-54 Gy) to the whole breast. Ninety-seven percent of patients also received a boost to the remaining nipple or tumor bed, a median total dose of 61.5 Gy (range, 50.4-70 Gy).

RESULTS

With median follow-up of 113 months (range, 18-257 months), 4 of 36 patients (11%) developed a first recurrence of disease in the treated breast only. Two of the four recurrences in the breast were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) only and two were invasive with DCIS. Two additional patients had a recurrence in the breast as a component of first failure. Actuarial local control rates for the breast as the only site of first recurrence were 91% at 5 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 80-100%) and 87% (95% CI, 75-99%) at both 10 and 15 years. Actuarial local control rates for breast recurrence, as a component of first failure, were 91% (95% CI, 80-100%), 83% (95% CI, 69-97%), and 76% (95% CI, 58-94%) at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. No clinical factors were identified as significant predictors for breast recurrence. Five-, 10- and 15-year actuarial rates for survival without disease of 97% (95% CI, 90-100%) and 5-, 10-, and 15-year actuarial rates of overall survival of 93% (95% CI, 84-100%) at 5 years and 90% (95% CI, 78-100%) at 10 and 15 years were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm excellent rates of local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival at 10 and 15 years following BCS and RT for Paget disease of the breast. This study continues to support the recommendation of local excision and definitive breast irradiation as an alternative to mastectomy in the treatment of patients with Paget disease presenting without a palpable mass or mammographic density.

Value of the Van Nuys Prognostic Index in prediction of recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ after breast-conserving surgery

BACKGROUND

The Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VNPI), an algorithm based on tumour size, tumour grade, presence of necrosis and excision margin width, is claimed to predict local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The aim of this study was to examine the validity of the VNPI in a UK population.

METHODS

Clinicopathological data, including VNPI subgroups, for 237 patients who had breast-conserving operations for DCIS were examined. Multivariate data analysis was performed using a Cox regression model to examine the independence and relative importance of different variables in predicting recurrence, and to compare the data with those used in derivation of the VNPI.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 47 months. There were 37 ipsilateral local recurrences. Excision margin width (P < 0.001) and tumour grade (by Van Nuys grading (P = 0.014) or simple nuclear grading (P = 0.004)) were the only independent risk factors for local recurrence. Excision margin width had three times more power than grade in predicting local recurrence. Subgrouping data by VNPI score predicted recurrence-free survival (P < 0.001), but stratified 78 per cent of patients into a group with a moderate risk of local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Excision margin width is the most important predictor of local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS. The VNPI lacked discriminatory power for guiding further patient management.

Towards optimal management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents a spectrum of heterogenous disease that accounts for approximately one fifth of all screen-detected breast cancers and is considered as a precursor of invasive breast cancer if left untreated (35-50% risk). DCIS can be treated by total mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction, local excision (LE) plus adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or LE alone. Total mastectomy is associated with low rates of local recurrence (1.4%) and breast cancer-specific mortality (0.59%). Three recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that adjuvant RT after LE of localized DCIS significantly reduces the incidence of local recurrence. However these trials did not identify any subgroups of patients where RT could be safely omitted. Retrospective studies suggest that RT can be safely omitted after adequate LE (margin width > or =1 cm) of small (< 15 mm), non-high grade DCIS not associated with necrosis. Further RCTs are required to validate these retrospective findings, with an emphasis on standardized and meticulous tissue processing and pathological evaluation. The role of adjuvant tamoxifen in the management of DCIS continues to evolve. Formal axillary dissection is not appropriate for DCIS, however, the potential role of the sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in selected high risk cases requires further evaluation. The International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS-II) trial aims to evaluate the potential role of third generation aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive DCIS.Future research will focus on the relevance of gene expression profiling, proteomics, Laser therapy and mammary ductoscopy to the management of DCIS.

Oncoplastic techniques allow extensive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast carcinomas

OBJECTIVE

To assess the oncologic and cosmetic outcomes in women with breast carcinoma who were treated with breast-conserving therapy using oncoplastic techniques with concomitant symmetrization of the contralateral breast.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Although breast-conserving therapy is the standard form of treatment for invasive breast tumors up to 4 cm, in patients with large, ill-defined, or poorly situated tumors, cosmetic results can be poor and clear resection margins difficult to obtain. The integration of oncoplastic techniques with a concomitant contralateral symmetrization procedure is a novel surgical approach that allows wide excisions and prevents breast deformities.

METHODS

This is a prospective study of 101 patients who were operated on for breast carcinoma between July 1985 and June 1999 at the Institut Curie. The procedure was proposed for patients in whom conservative treatment was possible on oncologic grounds but where a standard lumpectomy would have led to poor cosmesis. Standard institutional treatment protocols were followed. All patients received either pre- or postoperative radiotherapy. Seventeen patients received preoperative chemotherapy to downsize their tumors. Mean follow-up was 3.8 years. Results were analyzed statistically using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

RESULTS

Mean weight of excised material on the tumor side was 222 g. The actuarial 5-year local recurrence rate was 9.4%, the overall survival rate was 95.7%, and the metastasis-free survival rate was 82.8%. Cosmesis was favorable in 82% of cases. Preoperative radiotherapy resulted in worse cosmesis than when given postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of oncoplastic techniques and concomitant symmetrization of the contralateral breast allows extensive resections for conservative treatment of breast carcinoma and results in favorable oncologic and esthetic outcomes. This approach might be useful in extending the indications for conservative therapy.

The Systemic Progression of Human Cancer: A Focus on the Individual Disseminated Cancer Cell—The Unit of Selection

The metastatic progression of solid tumors is discussed controversially. Because metastasis is usually lethal, it appears as an end point of successive cellular changes. This has led to the prevailing interpretation that genetic changes, in addition to those present in the most advanced clone of the primary tumor, are required to initiate invasion, dissemination, and growth at anatomically distant sites. It has become possible to detect and analyze single disseminated cancer cells at ectopic sites long before metastasis can be diagnosed by standard clinical techniques. Because the finding of single disseminated cancer cells correlates with the subsequent development of distant metastasis, these cells have been identified as the precursors of metastasis. Their direct molecular-genetic characterization, however, shows that dissemination occurs very early in the process of accumulation of genetic changes and suggests that metastases may seldom be derived from the dominant clone of the primary tumor. In contrast, it appears that cancer cell evolution explores a multitude of variant cells from which systemic cancer can develop independently. This review integrates data derived by different approaches into a model of systemic cancer progression.

The clinical significance of cytokeratin-positive cells in lymph nodes at the time of mastectomy from patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ

BACKGROUND

We determined the presence or absence of and clinical significance of cytokeratin-positive cells in the lymph nodes of patients who had had mastectomies for ductal carcinoma-in-situ.

METHODS

Two pathologists independently assessed the axillary lymph nodes found. All patients had either a core or open biopsy performed before the time of mastectomy. The lymph nodes were assessed with hematoxylin and eosin stain and immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin marker AE1/AE3. The slides were assessed for the presence or absence of epithelial cells. As a control, axillary lymph nodes found in prophylactic mastectomies were assessed. None of these had had a previous biopsy performed.

RESULTS

Lymph nodes from all patients demonstrated no obvious epithelial cells on hematoxylin and eosin stain. Peripheral sinuses of lymph nodes from six patients (23%) who had mastectomies for ductal carcinoma-in-situ contained a few cytokeratin-positive cells on immunohistochemistry. The lymph nodes of the control group demonstrated no cytokeratin-positive cells. The mean follow-up of patients was 5 years, and all patients were alive without recurrence at the time of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Epithelial cells may be present in the lymph nodes draining a site of recent breast biopsy in the absence of invasive carcinoma, indicating that these are an artifact of recent surgery and not of micrometastatic disease.

Breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: a 20-year experience with excision plus radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

Breast conservation therapy is a practical alternative to mastectomy for the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The role of radiation therapy after excision for DCIS has been debated, however, its value in reducing recurrence has been proven by multiple prospective randomized trials and is well accepted.

METHODS

We examined a prospective database of 260 patients treated for DCIS with excision and radiation from 1979 to 2002. Two different treatment regimens were examined for local recurrence-free survival. Patients treated with radiation therapy 4 days per week were compared with patients treated 5 days per week. The total doses were similar for both groups; boost types differed. Local recurrence as a function of other factors, including nuclear grade, comedonecrosis, and margin width was evaluated.

RESULTS

The median time to local recurrence was 61 months for patients treated 4 days per week compared with 52 months for patients treated 5 days per week (P = not significant). There was no statistical difference in the Kaplan-Meier detailing the probability of local recurrence-free survival for patients treated 4 days per week versus patients treated 5 days per week. Overall, cosmetic results between the two groups were equivalent.

CONCLUSIONS

The comparison of two different radiation treatment regimens shows no difference in local disease-free survival or cosmetic result.

Age as a predictor of outcome for women with DCIS treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation: The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience

PURPOSE

To analyze the long-term outcome of breast conservation therapy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in a single institution and to analyze the prognostic importance, if any, of young patient age.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The hospital records of 150 patients with DCIS treated with surgical excision and radiotherapy at our institution between 1980 and 1997 were retrospectively reviewed. For most of the patients, intraoperative specimen radiographs or postoperative mammograms were available for use in assessing that an adequate surgical resection had been performed. The median patient age was 53 years (range 32-81), with 13% of patients <or=40 years old.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 63 months, 12 patients had local disease recurrence. The actuarial rate of local recurrence-free survival at 5 and 10 years was 96% and 88%, respectively. Local recurrence correlated with nuclear grade (p = 0.002) but was not associated with patient age at diagnosis (<40 years vs. >or=40 years, p = 0.39). In all cases of local recurrence, patients underwent surgery with or without chemotherapy, and disease control was achieved.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrate high rates of long-term overall survival, disease-specific survival, and local control in patients with DCIS of the breast treated conservatively with segmental mastectomy and radiotherapy. On the basis of the excellent long-term local control and 100% disease-specific survival rates, we found that patient age does not affect the outcome if the margins are clear. Continued studies in young patients treated with breast conservative therapy for DCIS are needed.

Histologic classification of ductal carcinoma in situ

Prior to the current mammographic era, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) usually presented as a large mass, was classified morphologically by architecture, and treated by mastectomy. The introduction of screening mammography led to an increase in the incidence of DCIS, a decrease in the average size of DCIS, and an increased emphasis on its heterogeneous nature. Thus, a reproducible and prognostically relevant classification system for DCIS is necessary. The ultimate goal of this classification is proper selection of patients for whom lumpectomy would suffice rather than mastectomy. Features to evaluate include: extent and size of disease, adequacy of resection margins, and histology. While none of the proposed histological classification systems were endorsed at the recent Consensus Conference on the Classification of DCIS, nuclear grade was the most important feature common to most of them. Architecture was given secondary importance. By definition, DCIS is a non-invasive clonal proliferation of epithelial cells originating in the terminal duct lobular unit, which would be expected to be monomorphic; however, it is the degree of nuclear pleomorphism that is primarily used to separate DCIS into low, intermediate, and high grades. Architecturally, DCIS has been divided into the following types: comedo, solid, cribriform, micropapillary, and papillary. Different architectural patterns and grades may be present in a given particular case; however, some combinations of patterns occur more frequently than others. Interobserver studies have shown nuclear grading to be interpreted with greater consistency than architecture, and nuclear grading methods have correlated with biological and molecular marker studies.

Surgical management of ductal carcinoma in situ in Australia in 1995

BACKGROUND

In the present paper we describe the presentation and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast in women in Australia in 1995. This representative, national data set provides a historical comparator for studies examining DCIS management that follow.

METHODS

Surgeons identified by population-based cancer registries as having treated a new diagnosis of DCIS between 1 April and 30 September 1995 completed a questionnaire on the presentation and management of each case.

RESULTS

Two hundred and five surgeons supplied treatment details on 418 DCIS tumours in 415 women. Half of all tumours were detected at Breast Screen clinics and a further 25% were detected at other mammography centres. Twenty-six percent of tumours were palpable at presentation, 33% were multifocal and 55% were high grade (including comedocarcinoma). Breast conserving therapy (BCT) rather than mastectomy was utilized in 260 (62%)of cases. Tumours that were of low grade, small in size and not multifocal were more likely to be treated by BCT. Surgeons seeing six or moreDCIS cases in the 6-month period were more likely to utilize BCT. Of the conservatively treated cases, 22% were referred for a radiation oncology consultation. The most common reasons for treating DCIS with mastectomy were that the tumour was too extensive or multifocal (63%), it extended to margins of the specimen (42%), or patient concerns about recurrence (34%).

CONCLUSIONS

In 1995 the majority of DCIS was treated with breast conserving surgery alone. Surgeons treating more DCIS cases were more likely to perform conservative surgery than surgeons treating only one DCIS case in the study period.

Effects of patient selection on the applicability of results from a randomised clinical trial (EORTC 10853) investigating breast-conserving therapy for DCIS

Selection of patients for randomised clinical trials may have a large impact on the applicability of the study results to the general population presenting the same disorder. However, clinical characteristics and outcome data on non-entered patients are usually not available. The effects of patient selection for the EORTC 10853 trial investigating the role of radiotherapy in breast conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ have been studied, in an analysis of all patients treated for ductal carcinoma in situ in five participating institutes. The reasons for not entering patients were evaluated and treatment results of the randomised patients were compared to those not entered. A total of 910 patients were treated for ductal carcinoma in situ. Of these, 477 (52%) were ineligible, with the size of the lesion being the main reason for ineligibility (30% of all ductal carcinoma in situ). Of the 433 eligible patients, 278 (64%) were randomised into the trial. The main reasons for non-entry of eligible patients were either physicians' preference for one of the treatment arms (26%) or patients' refusal (9%). These percentages showed significant variation among the institutes. At 4 years follow-up, those patients not entered in the trial and treated with local excision and radiotherapy, had higher local recurrence rates than the patients randomised in the trial and treated with the same approach, (17 vs 2%, P=0.03). The patients treated with local excision alone had equal local recurrence rates (11% in both groups). Selection of patients may explain the differences in outcome of the randomised patients, and those not-entered. Thus, the results of this trial may not be applicable to all patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy: a new option for patients with primary or locally recurrent breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a new standard of care for axillary node staging in patients with primary operable breast cancer. An increasing proportion of these patients undergo breast-conserving surgery, and 10% to 15% will develop local relapse requiring reoperation. Although previous breast or axillary surgery is often considered a contraindication to SLN biopsy, few data support this position. We report our experience with SLN biopsy in the reoperative setting.

STUDY DESIGN

We examined the 3,490 consecutive SLN biopsy procedures for breast cancer performed at our institution between September 1996 and July 2001; 32 (1%) of these followed previous axillary surgery: 22 (69%) for breast recurrence after SLN biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND); 7 (22%) after a recent, failed SLN biopsy or inadequate ALND; and 3 (9%) after earlier axillary surgery for an unrelated condition.

RESULTS

SLNs were identified in 24 of 32 (75%) cases and were positive in 3 of 24 (13%). Reoperative SLN biopsy was more successful when less than 10 versus 10 or more nodes had been removed previously (87% versus 44%). Both blue dye and isotope identified the SLN in 16 of 24 successful procedures (67%). Additional, nonsentinel nodes (mean, eight nodes) were removed in 17 of 24 patients (71%) and were negative in all cases. At a median followup of 13 months, no axillary recurrences have occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperative SLN biopsy after earlier SLN biopsy or ALND is feasible in selected breast cancer patients and is more likely to succeed when fewer than 10 nodes were removed during the earlier procedure. Further study is required to better define the subset of patients in whom reoperative SLN biopsy can replace ALND.

Breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: the French Cancer Centers' experience

PURPOSE

To assess the long-term outcome for women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated in current clinical practice by conservative surgery with or without definitive breast irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We analyzed 705 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ treated between 1985 and 1995 in nine French regional cancer centers; 515 underwent conservative surgery and radiotherapy (CS+RT) and 190 CS alone. The median follow-up was 7 years.

RESULTS

The 7-year crude local recurrence (LR) rate was 12.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.4-15.8) and 32.4% (95% CI 25-39.7) for the CS+RT and CS groups, respectively (p <0.0001). The respective 10-year results were 18.2% (95% CI 13.3-23) and 43.8% (95% CI 30-57.7). A total of 125 LRs occurred, 66 and 59 in the CS+RT and CS groups, respectively. Invasive or microinvasive LRs occurred in 60.6% and 52% of the cases in the same respective groups. The median time to LR development was 55 and 41 months. Nine (1.7%) and 6 (3.1%) nodal recurrences occurred in the CS+RT and CS groups, respectively. Distant metastases occurred in 1.4% and 3% of the respective groups. Patient age and excision quality (final margin status) were both significantly associated with LR risk in the CS+RT group: the LR rate was 29%, 13%, and 8% among women aged < or =40, 41-60, and > or =61 years (p <0.001). Even in the case of complete excision, we observed a 24% rate of LR (6 of 25) in women <40 years. Patients with negative, positive, or uncertain margins had a 7-year crude LR rate of 9.7%, 25.2%, and 12.2%, respectively (p = 0.008). RT reduced the LR rate in all subgroups, especially in those with comedocarcinoma (17% vs. 59% in the CS+RT and CS groups, respectively, p <0.0001) and mixed cribriform/papillary tumors (9% vs. 31%, p <0.0001). In the multivariate Cox regression model, young age and positive margins remained significant in the CS+RT group (p = 0.00012 and p = 0.016). Finally, the relative LR risk in the CS+RT group compared with the CS group was 0.35 (95% CI 0.25-0.51, p = 0.0001). Subsequent contralateral breast cancer occurred in 7.1% and 7.5% of the patients in the CS+RT and CS groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite the absence of randomization, our results are extremely consistent with the updated National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project B17 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10853 trials. We also noted that the LR risk was very high in women <40 years and/or in the case of incomplete excision.

Radiotherapy for breast cancer: today and tomorrow

Breast conservation therapy (BCT) with lumpectomy and radiation has allowed many women to preserve their breasts and avoid disfiguring surgery. Lumpectomy and breast irradiation is a standard therapy for early breast cancer patients who desire breast conservation. However, the overall rate of mastectomy exceeds that of BCT in the United States. There have been significant advances in patient awareness of the options available for local management of early breast cancer and changes in the attitudes of physicians, including surgeons, allowing a gradual rise in the rate of BCT in the last two decades. Now, investigations are designed to define subgroups of patients with early breast cancer in whom radiation can be safely omitted. In locally advanced breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has allowed some women to have BCT after initial cytoreduction. This approach results in excellent local control when patients are carefully selected for BCT. There is renewed interest in postmastectomy radiation for early breast cancer patients with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes. In this intermediate risk group for locoregional recurrence, the addition of chest wall and regional lymphatic irradiation to adjuvant systemic therapy has potential for significant improvement in ultimate survival. This concept is novel in breast cancer, a disease that was believed to be systemic at inception and in which only systemic control was thought to impact survival. In this era of effective adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer, local control measures have become more important as local control has real potential for impacting survival.

The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

BACKGROUND

Margin width is considered the most important risk factor for local recurrence in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. The purpose of this report is to assess the predictive utility of lumpectomy specimen margin assessment for the presence and extent of residual DCIS.

METHODS

Specimens from 253 DCIS cases with lumpectomy and reexcision were studied to determine to the probability of residual DCIS on reexcision. The probability of residual tumor was evaluated with respect to tumor size, margin status, nuclear grade, presence of necrosis, patient age, and the extent of specimen processing (number of sections/volume tissue). Lesions were grouped by size: less than or equal to 2 mm, greater than 2-15 mm, greater than 15-40 mm, or greater than 40 mm. Margin width was recorded as the distance of DCIS to the closest specimen edge or, for positive margins, scored as: extensive (margin involvement in > or =8 sections or >4 low-power fields [LPFs]), moderate (5-7 sections or 2-4 LPFs), minimal (2-4 sections or 1 LPF), or focal (1 section, single focus). The amount of residual tumor was graded by maximum dimension on a semiquantitative basis.

RESULTS

Initial excision margin significantly predicted for the presence of residual tumor on reexcision. Residual tumor was found on reexcision in 85% of extensively positive, 68% of moderately positive, 46% of minimally positive, 30% of focally positive, 41% of greater than 0-1 mm, 31% of greater than 1-2 mm, and 0% of greater than 2 mm margins (P < 0.0001). On univariate analysis, margin width and lesion size of initial excision specimens significantly predicted for the presence of residual DCIS on reexcision. Age, grade, necrosis, and extent of specimen processing were not significant prognostic factors. On multivariate analysis, both initial margin width (P < 0.0001) and lesion size (P = 0.02) significantly predicted for residual DCIS. As for amount of residual tumor, margin width and initial lesion dimension both significantly predicted for medium to large residuum, whereas age 45 years or younger was of borderline significance on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, margin width and lesion size on initial excision both remained significant predictors of larger volume residual tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

The margin status of a DCIS lumpectomy specimen is the most important predictive factor for both the presence and amount of residual disease.

EORTC Radiotherapy Group: achievements and future projects. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Radiotherapy (RT) Group will celebrate 27 years of activity in 2002. During its long history, the Radiotherapy Group has conducted a large number of studies which have provided valuable information on the radiation treatment of several disease sites. Group efforts have been concentrated on dose-effect studies, optimal fractionation schemes, combinations with other treatment modalities, and new radiotherapy techniques. The EORTC RT Group was the first in Europe to develop and introduce methodologies of Quality Assurance in radiotherapy. The RT Group actively collaborates with other EORTC Groups and international organisations. Currently, several phase III studies are being conducted in collaboration with European, North American and Australian organisations. The collaboration with RTOG led to the setting up of common systems for scoring late normal tissue effects. In the years to come, the Group will keep pioneering pivotal trials in radiotherapy and radio-chemotherapy. It will also explore combinations with novel therapies in phase I trials and implement innovative translational research programmes.

The EORTC Breast Cancer Group: 40 years of research contributing to improve breast cancer management

The EORTC Breast Cancer Group (EBCG) is a multidisciplinary international group created in 1962 in conjunction with the EORTC. This group has always focused its activities on the development of new cancer treatments and strategies for all categories of breast cancer. It has been active both in drug development, as well as in the development of new radiotherapy and surgical techniques to attempt to improve cure rates and loco-regional control. Over 40 years, the EBCG has performed dozens of clinical studies including several thousands of patients. Many of these studies have contributed to the clinical knowledge on the treatment of breast cancer and have influenced the standard management of this tumour. Beside its clinical research activities, the Group has also been very active in developing guidelines for breast cancer research, promoting high standards of care in conferences, as well as in fellowships and quality assurance programmes. EBCG is a founding member of the Breast InterGroup (BIG).

Contemporary management of breast cancer

Breast cancer is a heterogenous disease with significant variations in biologic potential, ranging from small, low-grade, DCIS discovered mammographically with essentially no impact on patient survival to rapidly growing, palpable, locally advanced invasive breast cancer with clinically palpable nodal metastasis. The current challenge is to identify the clinical, pathologic, and molecular factors that determine the biologic potential of a particular breast cancer. Although size, nodal status, histologic grade, age, surgical margin, and hormone receptor status of breast cancer are the most important prognostic factors, the focus of research must be beyond these factors to other nonspecific prognostic information. Bone marrow micrometastasis may be an important factor to help predict outcome (7a) and the complement of sentinel node biopsy, bone marrow analysis, and primary tumor features may allow physicians to better select therapy. With increased understanding of the individual molecular events that control the invasive potential of a particular cancer, practitioners should be better able to predict more accurately which patients have little risk of recurrent disease or metastasis and would be best served by surgery alone versus patients who have a high risk of recurrent and metastatic disease and who should receive multimodality care.

Current surgical management of breast cancer

Breast cancer surgery continues to become more conservative. Supporting this conservatism are (1) earlier diagnosis through mammographic screening, (2) an increasing role for diagnostic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, (3) the further development of image-guided core-needle biopsy, and (4) the advent of sentinel lymph node biopsy as an alternative to conventional axillary dissection. For patients with duct carcinoma in situ, the addition of radiotherapy and tamoxifen to surgical excision reduces local recurrence but has not yet improved survival over the rate observed with excision alone. There may be low-risk subgroups of duct carcinoma in situ patients for whom conservative surgery alone is adequate treatment. For patients with invasive cancer, breast conservation remains underutilized. A small survival benefit from post-mastectomy adjuvant radiotherapy is offset by an increased incidence of cardiovascular mortality, a phenomenon which has not yet been demonstrated for radiotherapy following breast conservation. Sentinel lymph node biopsy represents a new standard of care for axillary lymph node staging in the large majority of breast cancer patients with high-risk duct carcinoma in situ and stage I-II invasive cancers. The procedure is feasible, accurate, and works best with a combination of blue dye and radioisotope mapping. After proper validation studies, patients with negative sentinel lymph nodes do not require axillary dissection. The prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node micrometastases identified by enhanced pathologic techniques remains a matter of debate. Prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer incidence and mortality among those with a high-risk family history, and mutations of BRCA1-2, but has significant adverse psychosocial sequelae for a small and unpredictable fraction of patients and should not be undertaken lightly. Prophylactic oophorectomy should be offered to all women with BRCA1-2 mutations, especially those beyond the years of childbearing.

Modern radiotherapy for modern surgeons: an update on radiation oncology

Changes in the practice of radiation oncology have been significant over the last decade and continue to develop at an exciting rate. These advances range from our understanding of the increasingly important role of radiotherapy in the adjuvant and definitive settings to huge technological progress in the areas of tumour delineation, treatment planning, delivery and verification. In many cases, benefits have resulted from the ability of modern radiotherapy to deliver high doses with great accuracy and increasing safety in a highly individualized manner. This has impacted favourably on the management of all major malignancies as discussed in this paper. A good understanding of what can be achieved with modern radiotherapy has never been more important in ensuring an effective multidisciplinary approach to cancer management.

Use of SERMs for the adjuvant therapy of early-stage breast cancer

Tamoxifen was the first in a class of drugs now commonly referred to as selective estrogen receptor modulators or SERMs. SERMs exhibit tissue-specific estrogenic agonist/antagonist activity through their ability to bind to the estrogen receptor alpha (ER) protein and interact with coregulatory proteins, thereby modulating transcription of estrogen target genes. Since its first approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1977, tamoxifen has been found to (a) lower the risk of recurrence and death for women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, irrespective of menopausal and node status or use of adjuvant chemotherapy; (b) reduce the risk of invasive breast cancer following breast conservation in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); and (c) reduce the risk of breast cancer in high-risk women. Toremifene is the only other SERM approved by the FDA for breast cancer treatment. However, it offers no clear clinical advantage over tamoxifen in the adjuvant or metastatic settings. Several other SERMs are in various phases of clinical development. In addition, strategies to combine SERMs with other endocrine therapy like ovarian suppression or aromatase inhibitors are active areas of investigations. At present, SERMs are recognized as the first targeted and relatively nontoxic medical therapy for women with high-risk or steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.