Comparison of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a with glatiramer acetate in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (the REbif vs Glatiramer Acetate in Relapsing MS Disease [REGARD] study): a multicentre, randomised, parallel, open-label trial

Disease-modifying therapies in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

CLINICAL QUESTION

What is the best current disease-modifying therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis?

RESULTS

The evidence shows that the most effective disease-modifying therapy for delaying short- to medium-term disability progression, prevention of relapses, reducing the area and activity of lesions on magnetic resonance imaging, with the least side effects, is high-dose, high-frequency subcutaneous interferon-β1a 44 μg three times per week.

IMPLEMENTATION

The pitfalls in treatment of MS can be avoided by remembering the following points: The most effective therapy to prevent or delay the appearance of permanent neurological disability with the fewest side effects should be chosen, and treatment should not be delayed.Adherence to treatment should be monitored closely, and needs comprehensive patient information and education to establish long-term adherence, which is a critical determinant of long-term outcome.The correct approach to the disease includes disease management, symptom management, and patient management. A combination of tools is necessary to ease the various symptoms, which fall into three broad categories, i.e. rehabilitation, pharmacological, and procedural.It is important to understand that no treatment modality should be used alone, unless it is in itself sufficient to remedy the particular symptom/problem.

Influence of treatment in multiple sclerosis dysability: an open, retrospective, non-randomized long-term analysis

The efficacies of immunosuppressive (IMS) and immunomodulatory (IMM) drugs for multiple sclerosis (MS) have been reported in several studies. These agents can reduce relapse rates and lesions observed by magnetic resonance imaging studies. However, the effect of these medications in disability progression over 4 years is rarely examined. OBJECTIVE: To study the disabilities associated with MS patients after a long time period and to analyze the therapeutic influence of different types of treatments in patient disease progression. METHOD: This is an open, uncontrolled, non-randomized, retrospective study of the disease progression using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score (MSSS) in 155 cases of MS, which were 76% female with a mean age of onset of 30.21±9.70. The follow-up period was 115.39±88.08 months (median 92, 3 to 447 months). These cases were submitted to the following 277 different therapeutic procedures: 62 without IMS or IMM therapy (SYT) (just corticosteroids), 53 with azathioprine (AZA), 53 interferon-β (IFNβ)-1b 250 µg (BET), 55 IFNβ-1a 22 µg (R22), 19 IFNβ-1a 30 µg (AVO), 15 IFNβ-1a 44 µg (R44), 15 glatiramer acetate (COP) 20 mg, and 5 cases with mitoxantrone (MIT). RESULTS: The median EDSS group was 2.00 (0 to 5.5, mean 1.89±1.52) at the onset of each treatment and 2.50 (0 to 9, mean 3.06±2.18) at the end. The median initial MSSS was 3.34 (0.25 to 9.50, mean 3.94±2.91) and the final medial was 3.90 (0.05 to 9.88, mean 4.02±2.78). The EDSS between initial and final score for the whole group had statistically significant progression, as well as for the sub-groups SYT, AZA, BET and R22. No statistically significance difference was found in the MSSS between initial and final scores in the whole group or treatment sub-groups. The variation between the initial and final EDSS and MSSS among the types of treatments found no statistical significance for any group. CONCLUSION: In this study series, no statistical difference was found in the long-term progression of disability among the IMS and IMM treated cases, nor in the cases treated only with corticosteroids.

Surrogate endpoints for EDSS worsening in multiple sclerosis. A meta-analytic approach

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the effects on potential surrogate endpoints, such as MRI markers and relapses, observed in trials of experimental treatments are able to predict the effects of these treatments on disability progression as defined in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) trials.

METHODS

We used a pooled analysis of all the published randomized controlled clinical trials in RRMS reporting data on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) worsening and relapses or MRI lesions or both. We extracted data on relapses, MRI lesions, and the proportion of progressing patients. A regression analysis weighted on trial size and duration was performed to study the relationship between the treatment effect observed in each trial on relapses and MRI lesions and the observed treatment effect on EDSS worsening.

RESULTS

A set of 19 randomized double-blind controlled trials in RRMS were identified, for a total of 44 arms, 25 contrasts, and 10,009 patients. A significant correlation was found between the effect of treatments on relapses and the effect of treatments on EDSS worsening: the adjusted R(2) value of the weighted regression was 0.71. The correlation between the treatment effect on MRI lesions and EDSS worsening was slightly weaker (R(2) = 0.57) but significant.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the use of commonly used surrogate markers of EDSS worsening as endpoints in multiple sclerosis clinical trials. Further research is warranted to validate surrogate endpoints at the individual level rather than at the trial level, to draw important conclusions in the management of the individual patient.

Clinical effects and tolerability of high-dose, high-frequency recombinant interferon beta-1a in patients with multiple sclerosis: maximizing therapy through long-term adherence

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

High-dose, high-frequency IFN beta-1a in multiple sclerosis (MS) can prevent lesion formation, decrease the frequency/severity of relapses and delay progression of disability, with a proven safety profile. Rates of non-adherence are high. There are drugs under investigation that may have greater efficacy and different safety profiles from existing therapies.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Evidence supporting the efficacy of IFN beta-1a, factors contributing to non-adherence, and strategies to combat non-adherence. It is hoped that these strategies, coupled with future advances in pharmacogenetics, might lead to better outcomes. The PubMed database was searched using the terms "multiple sclerosis" and "interferon beta-1a", for papers published between 1998 and 2010. Relevant manuscripts and pivotal papers from clinical trials were cited. Searches of abstracts from congresses were also performed to obtain recent findings.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

An overview of early pivotal trials, comparative studies with other treatments, and recent studies assessing the development of this therapy.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Long-term treatment with IFN beta-1a has benefits in MS and a good safety profile. Although adherence outside of clinical trials can be poor, injection devices, better tolerated drug formulations and education regarding treatment expectations are some of the strategies employed to help patients to adhere to treatment in the hope of improving outcomes.

Identification of targets and new developments in the treatment of multiple sclerosis--focus on cladribine

Orally available disease-modifying drugs for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) represent an unmet need for this chronic and debilitating disease. Among 5 currently investigated drugs at phase 3 clinical stage, promising efficacy data for fingolimod and oral cladribine have recently been published. However, benefits need to be weighed against the risks to define the role of these compounds within current treatment regimens. In this review, data on the efficacy of a promising compound, oral cladribine, are discussed and balanced with known and anticipated risks in a postmarketing era, and finally gives an outlook on the potential place of this drug in treatment algorithms for MS in the future.

Multiple sclerosis: a practical overview for clinicians

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the commonest disabling neurological condition to afflict young adults and therefore has a high social burden. Over several decades, there has been a considerable progress in the understanding of the disease pathogenesis as well as in the clinical management of MS patients. The emphasis in managing MS patients has shifted to multidisciplinary teams working in specialist groups. A review of the literature was conducted using MedLine to identify recent advances in MS. The current consensus is that MS is an autoimmune disease triggered by environmental agents acting in genetically susceptible people. Based on that concept, new methods of immune intervention procedures have been introduced into clinical practice. Licensed first-line disease-modifying therapies reduce the MS attack or relapse rate by a third and delaying short-term disease progression. More effective therapies have emerged; however, these are associated with increased risks. New clinical and pathological insights are making us question the aetiology and pathogenesis of MS. The recognition of pathological heterogeneity has raised the question of whether MS is a single disease entity or a syndrome. Recent evidence suggests that the pathological subtype may predict therapeutic response to specific therapies. A new novel auto-antibody has defined a subset of neuromyelitis optica or Devic's disease as being distinct from MS. This is an attractive concept that is not widely accepted. The observation that MS progresses despite immunosuppressive therapy suggests that MS may be a neurodegenerative disease with overlapping immune activation possibly in response to the release of central nervous system auto-antigens. The development of neuroprotective therapies for MS is required to prevent the devastating effects of long-term disability as a result of progressive disease.

The role of glatiramer acetate in the early treatment of multiple sclerosis

The treatment of the underlying disease process causing multiple sclerosis has continued to evolve since the initial approval of interferon-beta-1b in 1993. Current emphasis is on early treatment, including treatment after a single clinical attack (clinically isolated syndrome). The assessment of which disease modifying medication to use as initial therapy has continued to remain a combination of science and the art of medicine. Equally important are the assessment of treatment failure and the subsequent choice of medication change. This article will present scientific information, as well as information about clinical decision making, about these choices, with emphasis on the changing role of glatiramer acetate in this process.

Patient satisfaction following transition from the original to the new formulation of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis: a randomized, two-arm, open-label, Phase IIIb study

OBJECTIVE

To assess satisfaction with the serum-free formulation of subcutaneous (sc) interferon (IFN) beta-1a among patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

Patients with relapsing MS who had been receiving sc IFN beta-1a for at least 6 months, were transitioned to the new formulation, 44 mug three times weekly. Patients were randomized to preventative ibuprofen (400 mg 30-60 minutes prior to injection) or ibuprofen as needed (PRN) for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the 'flu-like' symptom (FLS) domain score of the validated Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Concern Questionnaire (MSTCQ).

RESULTS

Of the 117 patients enrolled, 109 (93.2%) completed the study. Neither group's MSTCQ FLS score showed a clinically meaningful change from baseline to week 4: mean +/- SD changes were -1.1 +/- 4.4 in the preventative ibuprofen group and 0.8 +/- 3.6 in the ibuprofen PRN group. MSTCQ injection system satisfaction and global side-effect scores were unchanged; total and injection-site reaction scores improved moderately in both groups between baseline and week 4.

CONCLUSIONS

Results showed continued or increased levels of satisfaction with the new formulation of sc IFN beta-1a. FLS occurring with the new formulation were generally mild and seldom sufficiently bothersome to require ibuprofen treatment.

Glatiramer acetate for multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

This is an updated Cochrane review of the previous version published (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004 , Issue 1 . Art. No.: CD004678. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004678)Previous studies have shown that glatiramer acetate (Copaxone (R)), a synthetic amino acid polymer is effective in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE), and improve the outcome of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

OBJECTIVES

To verify the clinical efficacy of glatiramer acetate in the treatment of MS patients with relapsing remitting (RR) and progressive (P) course.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane MS Group Trials Register (26 March 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2009), MEDLINE (PubMed) (January 1966 to 26 March 2009), EMBASE (January 1988 to 26 March 2009) and hand searching of symposia reports (1990-2009).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing glatiramer acetate and placebo in patients with definite MS, whatever the administration schedule and disease course, were eligible for this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both patients with RR and P MS were analysed. Study protocols were comparable across trials. No major flaws were found in methodological quality. However, efficacy of blinding should be balanced against side effects, including injection-site reactions.

MAIN RESULTS

Among 409 retrieved references, we identified 16 RCTs; six of them, published between 1987 and 2007, met the selection criteria and were included in this review. Five hundred and forty RR patients and 1049 PMS contributed to the analysis. In RR MS, a decrease in the mean EDSS score (-0.33 and -0.45), was found respectively at 2 years and 35 months without any significant effect on sustained disease progression. The reduction of mean number of relapse was evident at 1 year (-0.35 ) 2 years (-0.51 ) and 35 months (-0.64), but significant studies ' heterogeneity was found. The number of hospitalisations and steroid courses were significantly reduced. No benefit was shown in P MS patients. No major toxicity was found. The most common systemic adverse event was a transient and self-limiting patterned reaction of flushing, chest tightness, sweating, palpitations, anxiety. Local injection-site reactions were observed in up to a half of patients treated with glatiramer acetate, thus making a blind assessment of outcomes questionable.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Glatiramer acetate did show a partial efficacy in RR MS in term of relapse -related clinical outcomes, without any significant effect on clinical progression of disease measured as sustained disability. The drug is not effective in progressive MS patients.

Update on the treatment options for multiple sclerosis

Recent progress in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) is remarkable, and the introduction of new therapies is yielding improvements in the management of MS. Furthermore, clinical trials with many different types of agents, especially selected monoclonal antibodies, have been undertaken or are ongoing, and some of the agents involved will probably be available as treatments for MS in the near future. Although these new and promising agents include targeted immunotherapies, some of them have limitations such as associated severe adverse events and the development of neutralizing antibodies. With regard to risk-benefit ratios, pharmacogenetics could shed light on inherited differences in drug metabolism and response, which would make individualized therapy possible in MS. Here, we review the recent progress in current therapeutic strategies for MS, and the potential options for future MS treatment.

Risks vs benefits of glatiramer acetate: a changing perspective as new therapies emerge for multiple sclerosis

An understanding of the risks, benefits, and relative value of glatiramer acetate (GA) in multiple sclerosis (MS) has been evolving based on recently completed head-to-head studies: REGARD (REbif vs Glatiramer Acetate in Relapsing MS Disease); BEYOND (Betaseron Efficacy Yielding Outcomes of a New Dose); and BECOME (BEtaseron vs COpaxone in Multiple Sclerosis with Triple-Dose Gadolinium and 3-Tesla MRI Endpoints). Outcomes in the primary endpoints of these trials showed no significant differences between GA and high-dose beta-interferons (IFNβs). Results of the PreCISe (Early GA Treatment in Delaying Conversion to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis [CDMS] in Subjects Presenting With a Clinically Isolated Syndrome [CIS]) trial led to the US Food and Drug Administration approval of GA in patients with a CIS. Furthermore, the ongoing follow-up study to the original pivotal GA trial, now extending beyond 15 years, continues to support the safety of GA. Currently, GA and IFNβs are no longer the only immunomodulators available for MS. Introduction of the monoclonal antibody, natalizumab (Tysabri^®; Biogen Idec, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA) provides an alternative immunomodulator for MS and has changed the therapeutic landscape dramatically. However, the rare but serious cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy that have occurred with natalizumab have raised concerns among clinicians and patients about using this agent and some of the emerging agents. The potential risks and benefits of the emerging therapies (cladribine, alemtuzumab, rituximab, fingolimod, laquinimod, teriflunomide, and dimethyl fumarate) based on phase II/III trials, as well as their use for indications other than MS, will be presented. This review provides available data on GA, natalizumab, and the emerging agents to support new developments in our understanding of GA and how its long-standing role as a first-line therapy in MS will evolve within the increasingly complex MS therapeutic landscape.

A new window in multiple sclerosis pathology: non-conventional quantitative magnetic resonance imaging outcomes

Recent findings suggest that neuronal pathology occurs early in the course of multiple sclerosis and seems to be responsible for accumulation of disability. Nonetheless, the nervous system has an intrinsic potential for repair and compensation in the neuronal component. Disease-modifying drugs such as glatiramer acetate interfere with, and down-regulate, inflammatory pathology and slow neurodegeneration. Moreover, certain regulatory cytokines and neurotrophic factors have the capacity to promote neuronal and axonal repair. Given the importance of neuronal injury in multiple sclerosis and the potential of certain treatments for neuronal repair, it is important to possess adequate and sensitive tools to visualise the pathology in the neuronal compartment. The most promising tools to measure neuronal and axonal damage in multiple sclerosis, as well as neuroprotection and repair, are whole brain volume change for quantification of general brain atrophy, and T1 hypointensity (black holes) and magnetisation transfer ratio for measuring evolution of lesion damage. Other promising techniques, such as diffusion tensor imaging-based fibre tracking and magnetic resonance spectroscopy may allow detailed analyses, but these are still in the experimental stage and are not available for routine clinical practice. Further paraclinical measurements such as optical coherence tomography for the evaluation of the anterior visual pathway may have potential as objective surrogate markers for neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis.

Effect of immunomodulatory medication on regional gray matter loss in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis--a longitudinal MRI study

Prevention of global gray matter (GM) volume changes in multiple sclerosis (MS) are an objective in clinical trials, but the effect of immunomodulatory medication on regional GM atrophy progression is unclear. MRIs from 86 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) followed up for 24 months were analyzed using voxel-based morphometry. An analysis of covariance model (cluster threshold, corrected p<0.05) was used to compare GM volumes between baseline and follow-up while stratified by immunomodulatory medication (IM): Interferone INF-beta-1a (n=34), INF-beta-1b (n=16), glatiramer acetate (GA) (n=15), and no-immunomodulatory treatment (n=21). In the INF-beta-1a/1b group (n=50), significant GM volume reductions were observed during follow-up in fronto-temporal, cingulate and cerebellar cortical brain regions, without significant differences between the INF-beta-1a and INF-beta-1b patients. In the GA group and in unmedicated patients, no significant regional GM volume reductions were observed. In contrast to GA, INF-beta-1a/1b treatment was associated with GM volume reductions in hippocampal/parahippocampal and anterior cingulate cortex. This is the first longitudinal study investigating the effects of IMs on GM in RRMS. Results suggest differences in the dynamics of regional GM volume atrophy in differentially treated or untreated RRMS patients.

Current therapeutic recommendations in multiple sclerosis

Recent clinical studies in multiple sclerosis have provided new data on glatiramer acetate, interferon-beta preparations and natalizumab, which will have important implications for optimising patient care. Once a diagnosis has been made with confidence, early initiation of immunotherapy is warranted because of the presence of continuous inflammatory disease activity. Approval for therapy in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome has been granted to several first-line treatments, and most recently to glatiramer acetate. The utility of systematic frequent MRI monitoring of disease activity and response to therapy is not yet clearly established. Treatment efficacy after initiating therapy at the first demyelinating episode has to be followed carefully and re-evaluated whenever necessary. The occurrence of further relapses, confirmed disability progression or MRI evidence of persistent or aggravated disease activity would be regarded as evidence for an inadequate treatment response. However, limitations of clinical scores in faithfully reflecting disease activity at all times, as well as uncertainties about the discriminatory capacity of surrogate measures such as MRI, need to be clarified before clear-cut recommendations on treatment failure can be advocated. Escalation therapy is reserved for patients presenting with 'aggressive disease', which can be operationally defined as the occurrence of two severe relapses within twelve months, together with either MRI evidence for persistent disease activity or a two-point progression of disability on the EDSS.

Current and future disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis

The development of disease-modifying therapies (DMT) in multiple sclerosis (MS) has rapidly evolved over the last few years and continues to do so. Prior to the United States Food and Drug Administration approval of the immunomodulatory agent, interferon-beta1b in 1993, no other drug had been shown to alter the course of the disease in a controlled study of MS. At present, there are five licenced disease-modifying agents in MS - interferon-beta1b, interferon-beta1a, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab and mitoxantrone. All have shown significant therapeutic efficacy in large controlled trials. However, current therapies are only partially effective and are not free from adverse effects. Moreover, available DMTs are overwhelmingly biased in favour of those with relapsing-remitting disease. Effective treatment for progressive MS is severely limited, with only interferon-beta1b and mitoxantrone having licenced use in secondary progressive, but not primary progressive disease. Monoclonal antibodies, such as natalizumab selectively target immune pathways involved in the pathogenic process of MS. Alemtuzumab, daclizumab and rituximab are other notable monoclonal antibodies currently undergoing phase II and III trials in MS. Alemtuzumab has so far shown promising therapeutic benefit in relapsing disease, although immunological adverse effects have been a problem. Oral therapies have the benefit of improved tolerability and patient compliance compared with current parenteral treatments. Cladribine and fingolimod (FTY720) have shown encouraging results in their phase III clinical trials. It is also worth noting the evidence for starting DMT in patients with clinically isolated syndrome, whereby early treatment has shown to delay the onset of clinically definite MS in separate phase III studies.

PRISMS: the story of a pivotal clinical trial series in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The PRISMS (Prevention of Relapses and disability by Interferon beta-1a Subcutaneously in Multiple Sclerosis) study was initiated in 1994, at which time there were few disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis (MS). The PRISMS series of studies has since provided up to 8 years of clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), safety, and immunogenicity data on the use of subcutaneous (sc) interferon (IFN) beta-1a in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. This review is the first collation of all these data in one article, with a look ahead to the next generation of studies involving the new formulation of sc IFN beta-1a.

METHODS

Published efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity data, in terms of prospectively defined endpoints and later post hoc analyses, from years 1-8 of the PRISMS series are summarized and collated for the first time. Some of the studies of sc IFN beta-1a that evolved from the PRISMS studies are also discussed.

FINDINGS

In the 2-year, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, IFN beta-1a (22 or 44 mcg three times weekly [tiw]) was associated with significantly lower relapse rates, disability progression, and MRI burden of disease compared with placebo (p <or= 0.05). Subsequently, in the 2-year extension, patients previously receiving placebo were re-randomized to active treatment, and a further 2 years of open-label treatment confirmed good long-term safety and therapeutic efficacy. Follow-up visits at years 7 or 8 (68.2% of initial population) demonstrated a continued benefit for patients originally randomized to the 44-mcg dose compared with those receiving the 22-mcg dose or whose treatment had been delayed by 2 years. Neutralizing antibodies were more common in patients receiving the 22-mcg dose and attenuated treatment efficacy during years 1-4.

CONCLUSION

Class I and long-term data from PRISMS support the use of sc IFN beta-1a tiw as a first-line treatment for MS, as evidenced by sustained efficacy rates, acceptable safety profiles, and high patient retention rates.

Kv1.3 potassium channels as a therapeutic target in multiple sclerosis

We discuss the potential use of inhibitors of Kv1.3 potassium channels in T lymphocytes as therapeutics for multiple sclerosis. Current treatment strategies target the immune system in a non-selective manner. The resulting general immunosuppression, toxic side-effects and increased risk of opportunistic infections create the need for more selective therapeutics. Autoreactive effector-memory T (T(EM)) cells, considered to be major mediators of autoimmunity, express large numbers of Kv1.3 channels. Selective blockers of Kv1.3 inhibit calcium signaling, cytokine production and proliferation of T(EM) cells in vitro, and T(EM) cell-motility in vivo. Kv1.3 blockers ameliorate disease in animal models of multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, type 1 diabetes mellitus and contact dermatitis without compromising the protective immune response to acute infections. Kv1.3 blockers have a good safety profile in rodents and primates.

Treatment of multiple sclerosis: role of natalizumab

The results on relapse rate and disease progression of available drugs for multiple sclerosis are shown, as well as their most relevant side effects. Results from pivotal and long-term follow-up studies support the efficacy and safety of interferons and glatiramer acetate. The treatment with mitoxantrone is limited by the occurrence of infertility, cardiotoxicy and leukaemia. Efficacy and tolerability of natalizumab are undisputable, compared to other drugs. Risks related to its treatment are PML, opportunistic infections, hepatotoxicity, melanoma, and their occurrence needs to be more exactly assessed by post-marketing surveillance. The principles of induction versus escalating therapy are also discussed. The final therapeutic decision is based on the evaluation of the disease state and prognosis, based on clinical and instrumental measures, and on the safety/efficacy profile of each treatment.

Multiple sclerosis. Part 2: ophthalmic issues in MS therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This update includes topics relating to the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) for the ophthalmologist.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite investigation into numerous genetic and environmental factors, the cause of MS remains elusive. MS is a disease of the central nervous system that mainly affects young people and usually progresses over time, leading to disability in multiple areas, including mobility, cognition, affect and vision. It is likely that, as novel MS treatments are introduced, there will be a greater interest in tracking visual function and monitoring for visual complications.

SUMMARY

Current therapies in MS include interferon, glatiramer, natalizumab and mitoxantrone. Other MS treatments are imminent, and include oral medications, monoclonal antibodies and chemotherapy. Treatment of the visual symptoms in MS and the side effects of MS therapies are reviewed in this article.

Assessing cost-effectiveness in the management of multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common causes of neurological disability in young and middle-aged adults, with current prevalence rates estimated to be 30 per 100,000 populations. Women are approximately twice as susceptible as males, but males are more likely to have progressive disease. The onset of the disease normally occurs between 20 and 40 years of age, with a peak incidence during the late twenties and early thirties, resulting in many years of disability for a large proportion of patients, many of whom require wheelchairs and some nursing home or hospital care. The aim of this study is to update a previous review which considered the cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs), such as interferons and glatiramer acetate, with more up to date therapies, such as mitaxantrone hydrochloride and natalizumab in the treatment of MS. The development and availability of new agents has been accompanied by an increased optimism that treatment regimens for MS would be more effective; that the number, severity and duration of relapses would diminish; that disease progression would be delayed; and that disability accumulation would be reduced. However, doubts have been expressed about the effectiveness of these treatments, which has only served to compound the problems associated with endeavors to estimate the relative cost-effectiveness of such interventions.

Effect of glatiramer acetate on conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (PreCISe study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Glatiramer acetate, approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, reduces relapses and disease activity and burden monitored by MRI. We assessed the efficacy of early treatment with glatiramer acetate in delaying onset of clinically definite multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

In this randomised, double-blind trial, undertaken in 80 sites in 16 countries, 481 patients presenting with a clinically isolated syndrome with unifocal manifestation, and two or more T2-weighted brain lesions measuring 6 mm or more, were randomly assigned to receive either subcutaneous glatiramer acetate 20 mg per day (n=243) or placebo (n=238) for up to 36 months, unless they converted to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. The randomisation scheme used SAS-based blocks stratified by centre, and patients and all personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was time to clinically definite multiple sclerosis, based on a second clinical attack. Analysis was by intention to treat. A preplanned interim analysis was done for data accumulated from 81% of the 3-year study exposure. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00666224.

FINDINGS

All randomly assigned participants were analysed for the primary outcome. Glatiramer acetate reduced the risk of developing clinically definite multiple sclerosis by 45% compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.40-0.77; p=0.0005). The time for 25% of patients to convert to clinically definite disease was prolonged by 115%, from 336 days for placebo to 722 days for glatiramer acetate. The most common adverse events in the glatiramer acetate group were injection-site reactions (135 [56%] glatiramer acetate vs 56 [24%] placebo) and immediate post-injection reactions (47 [19%] vs 12 [5%]).

INTERPRETATION

Early treatment with glatiramer acetate is efficacious in delaying conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndrome and brain lesions detected by MRI.

FUNDING

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Israel.

The present efficacy of multiple sclerosis therapeutics: Is the new 66% just the old 33%?

A challenge for the clinician treating patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is to determine the most effective treatment while weighing the benefits and risks. Results of the phase 2 and phase 3 studies on natalizumab were received with great interest, in part due to the "improved" risk reduction for relapse rate, disease progression, and MRI metrics observed in comparison to results in trials of beta-interferon and glatiramer acetate. However, comparison across trials is invalid, in large part due to differences in the study populations. The increased efficacy observed in more recent trials has also been attributed to a fundamental change in subjects with MS enrolled in recent trials compared with the prior decade. In this article, we debate the relative efficacy of natalizumab vs the older injectable therapies.

250 microg or 500 microg interferon beta-1b versus 20 mg glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a prospective, randomised, multicentre study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the Betaferon Efficacy Yielding Outcomes of a New Dose (BEYOND) trial was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 250 microg or 500 microg interferon beta-1b with glatiramer acetate for treating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

Between November, 2003, and June, 2005, 2447 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis were screened and 2244 patients were enrolled in this prospective, multicentre, randomised trial. Patients were randomly assigned 2:2:1 by block randomisation with regional stratification to receive one of two doses of interferon beta-1b (250 microg or 500 microg) subcutaneously every other day or 20 mg glatiramer acetate subcutaneously every day. The primary outcome was relapse risk, defined as new or recurrent neurological symptoms separated by at least 30 days from the preceding event and that lasted at least 24 h. Secondary outcomes were progression on the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and change in T1-hypointense lesion volume. Clinical outcomes were assessed quarterly for 2.0-3.5 years; MRI was done at screening and annually thereafter. Analysis was by per protocol. This study is registered, number NCT00099502.

FINDINGS

We found no differences in relapse risk, EDSS progression, T1-hypointense lesion volume, or normalised brain volume among treatment groups. Flu-like symptoms were more common in patients treated with interferon beta-1b (p<0.0001), whereas injection-site reactions were more common in patients treated with glatiramer acetate (p=0.0005). Patient attrition rates were 17% (153 of 888) on 250 microg interferon beta-1b, 26% (227 of 887) on 500 microg interferon beta-1b, and 21% (93 of 445) for glatiramer acetate.

INTERPRETATION

500 microg interferon beta-1b was not more effective than the standard 250 microg dose, and both doses had similar clinical effects to glatiramer acetate. Although interferon beta-1b and glatiramer acetate had different adverse event profiles, the overall tolerability to both drugs was similar.

FUNDING

Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.

Benefits of glatiramer acetate in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is a chronic, progressive disorder marked by repeated exacerbations that lead to increases in neurological disability. Glatiramer acetate and the IFN-betas are recommended as first-line agents for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis owing to their potential to reduce frequency and severity of relapses, decrease development of new brain lesions and delay permanent disability. After three decades of study, the preponderance of the evidence suggests that the efficacy of glatiramer acetate is similar to the IFN-betas and new data collected in more naturalistic settings suggest that it may provide improved quality of life, increased productivity and cost-effectiveness. This article will review this evidence including data from very recent head-to-head clinical trials and pharmacoeconomic analyses of cost-effectiveness.

Improving compliance with interferon-beta therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease affecting young adults (with a peak of onset between the ages of 20 and 40 years). In 80-90% of cases, it is characterized by an early relapsing-remitting (RR) inflammatory phase, followed by a secondary progressive course in which disability progressively accumulates. Interferon-beta (IFNbeta) therapies represent the first-line treatment of RRMS. There are three IFNbeta formulations currently licensed for RRMS. Two are formulations of INFbeta-1a, one administered at a dosage of 30 mug intramuscularly weekly (Avonex(R)) and the other administered at a dosage of 22 or 44 microg subcutaneously (SC) three times a week (Rebif(R) 22 and 44). The third is a formulation of IFNbeta-1b, administered at a dosage of 250 microg SC every other day (Betaseron(R)). These treatments reduce the frequency of acute relapses and, to a lesser extent, disability progression. However, when starting an IFNbeta therapy, a treatment discontinuation rate ranging from 14% to 44% has to be expected. In a sizable proportion of patients, treatment suspension is caused by the occurrence of adverse effects (most commonly a flu-like syndrome and injection site reactions) and/or poor compliance. Individualized patient education and support are critical to improve adherence to therapy in the long term. Approaches aimed at reducing the proportion of subjects interrupting IFNbeta encompass both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, and may involve several professional figures, such as the neurologist, the psychologist, the pharmacist, the physical and speech therapist, and the nurse. Recently, the development of new IFNbeta formulations, with reduced immunogenic potential, has offered an additional approach to improving patient adherence. Biferonex(R) is a pH neutral and human serum albumin-free IFNbeta-1a. A phase III, 2-year study of the product involving patients with RRMS has been conducted, but the results were not considered conclusive enough to allow approval in Europe. Rebif(R) New Formulation (RNF) is a formulation of INFbeta-1a that is not produced using fetal bovine serum and that does not have human serum albumin as an excipient. The formulation has been approved in Europe and an application for approval has been filed in the US. On the basis of the final analysis of a phase III trial, RNF showed higher tolerability, particularly in terms of injection site reactions, compared with the older formulation. Further studies assessing its usefulness as an alternative therapy for patients who are intolerant of other IFNbeta formulations are required.

Lessons from randomised direct comparative trials

For over a decade, four immunomodulatory therapies have been available for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. However, few direct comparative data were available to facilitate the choice of treatment. This choice has been influenced by the perception that interferon-beta preparations have greater efficacy than glatiramer acetate, due to apparently more rapid and robust reduction of gadolinium-enhancing lesions seen on magnetic resonance imaging in the pivotal trials of these agents. This situation has changed in the last year, with the outcomes of three randomised clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety of glatiramer acetate with that of a high-dose interferon-beta in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. These are the REGARD, BEYOND and BECOME trials. In the REGARD trial, 764 patients were randomised to treatment with either interferon-beta 1a sc 44 microg or glatiramer acetate for 96 weeks; no significant difference in the time to first relapse was observed. The largest of the three comparative studies, the BEYOND trial, compared treatment with interferon-beta 1b sc 500 microg, interferon-beta 1b sc 250 microg or glatiramer acetate for two years in 2,244 patients. The hazard ratio for multiple relapses was close to unity for comparisons between all groups, indicating equivalent efficacy in all three treatment arms. Relapse rates (around 0.3 relapses/year) in all these studies were much lower than anticipated and lower than those reported a decade previously in the pivotal trials of beta-interferons and glatiramer acetate. No unexpected safety issues were identified in any of these studies. The completion of these direct comparative studies has considerably enriched the clinical evidence database by contributing large numbers of patients. This provides an invaluable contribution for helping the physician make an informed choice about treatment. The results of the direct comparative studies provide evidence that glatiramer acetate and high-dose interferon-beta preparations have comparable clinical efficacy.

High-dose, high-frequency recombinant interferon beta-1a in the treatment of multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

There is at present no cure for multiple sclerosis (MS), and existing therapies are designed primarily to prevent lesion formation, decrease the rate and severity of relapses and delay the resulting disability by reducing levels of inflammation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to assess the treatment of relapsing MS with particular focus on subcutaneous (s.c.) interferon (IFN) beta-1a.

METHOD

The literature on IFN beta-1a therapy of MS was reviewed based on a PubMed search (English-language publications from 1990) including its pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy in relapsing MS as shown in placebo-controlled studies and in comparative trials, efficacy in secondary progressive MS, safety and tolerability, and the impact of neutralizing antibodies.

CONCLUSION

The literature suggests that high-dose, high-frequency s.c. IFN beta-1a offers an effective option for treating patients with relapsing MS, with proven long-term safety and tolerability, and has a favourable benefit-to-risk ratio compared with other forms of IFN beta.

Safety and immunogenicity of a new formulation of interferon beta-1a (Rebif New Formulation) in a Phase IIIb study in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: 96-week results

BACKGROUND

A new formulation of subcutaneous (s.c.) interferon-beta-1a has been developed (Rebif New Formulation, RNF), produced without fetal bovine serum and without human serum albumin as an excipient, with the aim of improving injection tolerability, and reducing immunogenicity.

OBJECTIVES

This article reports 96-week analyses of a Phase IIIb, open-label study of the safety and immunogenicity of RNF compared with historical (EVIDENCE study) and recent (REGARD study) data on the original formulation.

METHODS

Patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (McDonald criteria) and an Expanded Disability Status Scale score < 6.0 received RNF, 44 microg s.c. three times weekly.

RESULTS

The proportion of neutralizing antibody-positive (NAb+) patients (serum NAb status >or=20 neutralizing units/mL) at week 96 (last observation carried forward; primary endpoint) was 17.4% (exact 95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.0-22.5), compared with 21.4% (95% CI: 17.2-26.2) in the EVIDENCE study, and 27.3% (95% CI: 22.8-32.1) in the REGARD study. The proportion of patients NAb+ at any time during the 96 weeks was 18.9% (95% CI: 14.4-24.2), compared with 27.1% (95% CI: 22.4-32.2) and 33.7% (95% CI: 28.9-38.7), respectively. Most pre-specified categories of adverse events were reported by patients in the RNF study at a similar or lower proportion than in the EVIDENCE and REGARD studies. Injection-site reactions were experienced by fewer patients than in the EVIDENCE and REGARD studies.

CONCLUSIONS

RNF has improved overall immunogenicity and safety profiles compared with the original formulation.