Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL

Chaperonins

The molecular chaperones are a diverse set of protein families required for the correct folding, transport and degradation of other proteins in vivo. There has been great progress in understanding the structure and mechanism of action of the chaperonin family, exemplified by Escherichia coli GroEL. The chaperonins are large, double-ring oligomeric proteins that act as containers for the folding of other protein subunits. Together with its co-protein GroES, GroEL binds non-native polypeptides and facilitates their refolding in an ATP-dependent manner. The action of the ATPase cycle causes the substrate-binding surface of GroEL to alternate in character between hydrophobic (binding/unfolding) and hydrophilic (release/folding). ATP binding initiates a series of dramatic conformational changes that bury the substrate-binding sites, lowering the affinity for non-native polypeptide. In the presence of ATP, GroES binds to GroEL, forming a large chamber that encapsulates substrate proteins for folding. For proteins whose folding is absolutely dependent on the full GroE system, ATP binding (but not hydrolysis) in the encapsulating ring is needed to initiate protein folding. Similarly, ATP binding, but not hydrolysis, in the opposite GroEL ring is needed to release GroES, thus opening the chamber. If the released substrate protein is still not correctly folded, it will go through another round of interaction with GroEL.

A single ring is sufficient for productive chaperonin-mediated folding in vivo

Facilitated protein folding by the double toroidal bacterial chaperonin, GroEL/GroES, proceeds by a "two-stroke engine" mechanism in which an allosteric interaction between the two rings synchronizes the reaction cycle by controlling the binding and release of cochaperonin. Using chimeric chaperonin molecules assembled by fusing equatorial and apical domains derived from GroEL and its mammalian mitochondrial homolog, Hsp60, we show that productive folding by Hsp60 and its cognate cochaperonin, Hsp10, proceeds in vitro and in vivo without the formation of a two-ring structure. This simpler "one-stroke" engine works because Hsp60 has a different mechanism for the release of its cochaperonin cap and bound target protein.

Atomic force microscopy detects changes in the interaction forces between GroEL and substrate proteins

The structure of the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL has been investigated by tapping-mode atomic force microscopy (AFM) under liquid. High-resolution images can be obtained, which show the up-right position of GroEL adsorbed on mica with the substrate-binding site on top. Because of this orientation, the interaction between GroEL and two substrate proteins, citrate synthase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a destabilizing Gly-->Ala mutation and RTEM beta-lactamase from Escherichia coli with two Cys-->Ala mutations, could be studied by force spectroscopy under different conditions. The results show that the interaction force decreases in the presence of ATP (but not of ATPgammaS) and that the force is smaller for native-like proteins than for the fully denatured ones. It also demonstrates that the interaction energy with GroEL increases with increasing molecular weight. By measuring the interaction force changes between the chaperonin and the two different substrate proteins, we could specifically detect GroEL conformational changes upon nucleotide binding.

Prefoldin, a chaperone that delivers unfolded proteins to cytosolic chaperonin

We describe the discovery of a heterohexameric chaperone protein, prefoldin, based on its ability to capture unfolded actin. Prefoldin binds specifically to cytosolic chaperonin (c-cpn) and transfers target proteins to it. Deletion of the gene encoding a prefoldin subunit in S. cerevisiae results in a phenotype similar to those found when c-cpn is mutated, namely impaired functions of the actin and tubulin-based cytoskeleton. Consistent with prefoldin having a general role in chaperonin-mediated folding, we identify homologs in archaea, which have a class II chaperonin but contain neither actin nor tubulin. We show that by directing target proteins to chaperonin, prefoldin promotes folding in an environment in which there are many competing pathways for nonnative proteins.

Asymmetry, commitment and inhibition in the GroE ATPase cycle impose alternating functions on the two GroEL rings

The ATPase cycle of GroE chaperonins has been examined by transient kinetics to dissect partial reactions in complexes where GroEL is asymmetrically loaded with nucleotides. The occupation of one heptameric ring by ADP does not inhibit the loading of the other with ATP nor does it prevent the consequent structural rearrangement to the "open" state. However, ADP binding completely inhibits ATP hydrolysis in the asymmetric complex, i.e. ATP cannot by hydrolysed when ADP is bound to the other ring. This non-competitive inhibition of the ATPase by ADP is consistent with a ring-switching, or "two-stroke", mechanism of the type: ATP:GroEL --> ADP:GroEL --> ADP:GroEL:ATP --> GroEL:ATP --> GroEL:ADP, i.e. with respect to the GroEL rings, ATP turns over in an alternating fashion. When the ATP-stabilized, "open" state is challenged with hexokinase and glucose, to quench the free ATP, the open state relaxes slowly (0.44 s-1) back to the apo (or closed) conformation. This rate, however, is three times faster than the hydrolytic step, showing that bound ATP is not committed to hydrolysis. When GroES is bound to the GroEL:ATP complex and the system is quenched in the same way, approximately half of the bound ATP undergoes hydrolysis on the chaperonin complex showing that the co-protein increases the degree of commitment. Thus, non-competitive inhibition of ATP hydrolysis, combined with the ability of the co-protein to block ligand exchange between rings has the effect of imposing a reciprocating cycle of reactions with ATP hydrolysing, and GroES binding, on each of the GroEL rings in turn. Taken together, these data imply that the dominant, productive steady state reaction in vivo is: GroEL:ATP:GroES --> GroEL:ADP:GroES --> ATP:GroEL:ADP:GroES --> ATP:GroEL:ADP --> GroES:ATP:GroEL:ADP --> GroES:ATP:GroEL for a hemi-cycle, and that significant inhibi tion of hydrolysis may arise through the formation of a dead-end ADP:GroEL:ATP:GroES complex.

Crystal structure of the thermosome, the archaeal chaperonin and homolog of CCT

We have determined to 2.6 A resolution the crystal structure of the thermosome, the archaeal group II chaperonin from T. acidophilum. The hexadecameric homolog of the eukaryotic chaperonin CCT/TRiC shows an (alphabeta)4(alphabeta)4 subunit assembly. Domain folds are homologous to GroEL but form a novel type of inter-ring contact. The domain arrangement resembles the GroEL-GroES cis-ring. Parts of the apical domains form a lid creating a closed conformation. The lid substitutes for a GroES-like cochaperonin that is absent in the CCT/TRiC system. The central cavity has a polar surface implicated in protein folding. Binding of the transition state analog Mg-ADP-AIF3 suggests that the closed conformation corresponds to the ATP form.

The ins and outs of a molecular chaperone machine

Genetic and biochemical work has highlighted the biological importance of the GroEL/GroES (Hsp60/Hsp10; cpn60/cpn10) chaperone machine in protein folding. GroEL's donut-shaped structure has attracted the attention of structural biologists because of its elegance as well as the secrets (substrates) it can hide. The recent determination of the GroES and GroEL/GroES structures provides a glimpse of their plasticity, revealing dramatic conformational changes that point to an elaborate mechanism, coupling ATP hydrolysis to substrate release by GroEL.

Chaperonins

Molecular chaperones are essential to all living organisms. Their key role consists of mediating protein folding within the cell. Recent functional studies have provided more detailed information about the function and regulation of the chaperone network. Highlights of the past year include the crystal structure determinations of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES complex and of their isolated peptide-binding domains.

Structural aspects of GroEL function

The chaperonin GroEL and its cofactor GroES facilitate protein folding in an ATP-regulated manner. The recently solved crystal structure of the GroEL.GroES.(ADP)7 complex shows that the lining of the cavity in the polypeptide acceptor state is hydrophobic, whereas in the protein-release state it becomes hydrophilic. Other highlights of the past year include the visualization of the allosteric states of GroEL with respect to ATP using cryo-electron microscopy, and an X-ray crystallographic analysis of the interaction between the apical domain of GroEL and a peptide.

Structural and mechanistic consequences of polypeptide binding by GroEL

The remarkable ability of the chaperonin GroEL to recognise a diverse range of non-native states of proteins constitutes one of the most fascinating molecular recognition events in protein chemistry. Recent structural studies have revealed a possible model for substrate binding by GroEL and a high-resolution image of the GroEL-GroES folding machinery has provided important new insights into our understanding of the mechanism of action of this chaperonin. Studies with a variety of model substrates reveal that the binding of substrate proteins to GroEL is not just a passive event, but can result in significant changes in the structure and stability of the bound polypeptide. The potential impact of this on the mechanism of chaperonin-assisted folding is not fully understood, but provides exciting scope for further experiment.

Effects of the inter-ring communication in GroEL structural and functional asymmetry

The chaperonin GroEL consists of a double-ring structure that assists protein folding in the presence of GroES and ATP. Recent studies suggest that the 7-mer ring is the functional unit where protein folding takes place. Nevertheless, both GroEL rings are required to complete the reaction cycle through signals transmitted between the two rings. Electron microscopy, image processing, and biochemical analysis of GroEL, a single-ring mutant (SR1) and a inter-ring communication affected mutant (A126V), in the presence of ATP and adenylyl imidodiphosphate, have allowed the identification of a conformational change in the apical domains that is strictly dependent on the communication between the two GroEL rings. It is deduced from these results that the binding of nucleotide to both GroEL rings generates, as a consequence of the inter-ring communication, a functionally and structurally asymmetric particle. This asymmetric particle has a ring with a small conformational change in its apical domains and high affinity toward unfolded substrate and GroES, and the other ring has a larger conformational change in its apical domains and lower affinity toward substrate and GroES.

La cage aux fold: asymmetry in the crystal structure of GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7

The structure of the molecular chaperone GroEL from Escherichia coli in complex with GroES and seven ADP molecules has recently been reported to 3 A resolution. The structure illustrates how the cavity of GroEL is converted from a hydrophobic environment, suitable for binding unfolded polypeptides, to a much larger hydrophilic environment suitable for refolding proteins.

The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex

Chaperonins assist protein folding with the consumption of ATP. They exist as multi-subunit protein assemblies comprising rings of subunits stacked back to back. In Escherichia coli, asymmetric intermediates of GroEL are formed with the co-chaperonin GroES and nucleotides bound only to one of the seven-subunit rings (the cis ring) and not to the opposing ring (the trans ring). The structure of the GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 complex reveals how large en bloc movements of the cis ring's intermediate and apical domains enable bound GroES to stabilize a folding chamber with ADP confined to the cis ring. Elevation and twist of the apical domains double the volume of the central cavity and bury hydrophobic peptide-binding residues in the interface with GroES, as well as between GroEL subunits, leaving a hydrophilic cavity lining that is conducive to protein folding. An inward tilt of the cis equatorial domain causes an outward tilt in the trans ring that opposes the binding of a second GroES. When combined with new functional results, this negative allosteric mechanism suggests a model for an ATP-driven folding cycle that requires a double toroid.