The effect of finasteride on the risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Finasteride Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study Group

Benign prostatic hyperplasia: current clinical practice

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common benign adenoma in men, affecting nearly all of them. BPH represents a clinically significant cause of bladder outflow obstruction in up to 40% of men. The growing frequency of diagnosis is due to increasing life expectancy and a trend toward seeking medical advice at earlier stages of the disease. The last decade has witnessed a significant shift in emphasis in the management of BPH, with medical therapies and, to a lesser extent, minimally invasive therapies becoming the predominant active therapy choices. The development of effective therapies such as alpha-adrenergic blockers and 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors and the possibility of their combined use represent the most significant advance in the treatment of BPH.

The different reduction rate of prostate-specific antigen in dutasteride and finasteride

Purpose

To compare and analyze the therapeutic effects and changes in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level with treatment with finasteride or dutasteride for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) for 1 year.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively investigated patients who suffered from BPH for 1 year between January 2005 and December 2008. For treatment groups, we divided the patients into two groups: one was treated with alfuzosin and finasteride and the other was treated with alfuzosin and dutasteride. At the beginning of treatment, the patients underwent transrectal ultrasonography and measurement of urine flow rate, residual urine volume, PSA, and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Patients with diseases affecting urinary function were excluded. We not only analyzed the data at the time of initial treatment, but also after 1 year of treatment. A total of 219 patients were able to be evaluated for 1 year.

Results

Both finasteride and dutasteride reduced PSA and prostate volume significantly. The comparison between groups showed a more significant reduction of PSA (p=0.020) and prostate volume (p=0.052) in the dutasteride group. Other parameters did not differ significantly between the groups.

Conclusions

5-α Reductase inhibitors for BPH treatment reduced PSA and prostate volume significantly when the patients were treated for 1 year. Administration of dutasteride is considered to be more effective in reducing PSA and prostate volume. Therefore, dutasteride should not be considered equivalent to finasteride in the reduction rate of PSA. The intensity of dutasteride must be reevaluated in comparison with finasteride.

Prostate biopsy in patients with long-term use of indwelling bladder catheter: what is the rationale?

OBJECTIVE

Acute urinary retention (AUR) is expected to occur in 2% to 39% men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. To date, no study has elucidated the effect of long-term use of indwelling bladder catheter on serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and on the incidence of prostate cancer (CaP). The aim of the present study is to analyze the incidence of CaP in patients with long-term use of indwelling bladder catheter and determine some practice patterns on this issue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study comprised a retrospective analysis of data from 1,651 patients who had undergone transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy from July 2004 to June 2009. Among these patients, 198 (12%) were using an indwelling bladder catheter during the biopsy for at least 1 month. The incidence of CaP was recorded according to total PSA levels. Other variables such patient age, free/total PSA rate, PSA density, prostate volume, and duration of catheter use was also analyzed. Men with a digital rectal examination suspicious for cancer were not considered for analysis.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 71 years (37 to 89 years). Overall, 25% of patients presented a CaP diagnosis. CaP incidence according to the PSA levels was 0%, 18.9%, 24.5%, and 40.6% for patients with PSA ≤4.0, 4.1-10.0, 10.1-20.0, and >20.0 ng/ml, respectively. When prostate volume was analyzed together, we demonstrated that only 1 (2.4%) patient with PSA below 10.0 ng/ml and prostate volume >60 g had CaP. Median total PSA, PSA density, and prostate volume were statistically different between patients with and without CaP.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate biopsy should not be indicated for all patients with diagnosis of BPH and AUR who present an elevated PSA level. Patients with PSA below 10.0 ng/ml, and prostate volume >60 g should only undergo biopsy in selected cases. Patients with PSA >20.0 ng/ml and a prostate volume ≤60 g are at higher risk of CaP diagnosis.

Finasteride for benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), a non-malignant enlargement of the prostate in aging men, can cause bothersome urinary symptoms (intermittency, weak stream, straining, urgency, frequency, incomplete emptying). Finasteride, a five-alpha reductase inhibitor (5ARI), blocks the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone, reduces prostate size, and is commonly used to treat symptoms associated with BPH.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical effectiveness and harms of finasteride versus placebo and active controls in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Library (which includes CDSR (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects), HTA (Heath Technology Assessments), and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and which includes EMBASE and MEDLINE), LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information) and Google Scholar for randomized, controlled trials (RCTs). We also handsearched systematic reviews, references, and clinical-practice guidelines.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials in the English language with placebo and/or active arms with a duration of at least 6 months.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

JT extracted the data, which included patient characteristics, outcomes, and harms. Our primary outcome was change in a validated, urinary symptom-scale score, such as the AUA/IPSS. A clinically meaningful change was defined as 4 points. We also categorized outcomes by trial lengths of ≤ 1 year (short term) and > 1 year (long term).

MAIN RESULTS

Finasteride consistently improved urinary symptom scores more than placebo in trials of > 1 year duration, and significantly lowered the risk of BPH progression (acute urinary retention, risk of surgical intervention, ≥ 4 point increase in the AUASI/IPSS). In comparison to alpha-blocker monotherapy, finasteride was less effective than either doxazosin or terazosin, but equally effective compared to tamsulosin. Both doxazosin and terazosin were significantly more likely than finasteride to improve peak urine flow and nocturia, versus finasteride. Versus tamsulosin, peak urine flow and QoL improved equally well versus finasteride. However, finasteride was associated with a lower risk of surgical intervention compared to doxazosin, but not to terazosin, while finasteride and doxazosin were no different for risk of acute urinary retention. Two small trials reported no difference in urinary symptom scores between finasteride and tamsulosin. Finasteride + doxazosin and doxazosin monotherapy improved urinary symptoms equally well (≥ 4 point improvement).For finasteride, there was an increased risk of ejaculation disorder, impotence, and lowered libido, versus placebo. Versus doxazosin, finasteride had a lower risk of asthenia, dizziness, and postural hypotension, and versus terazosin, finasteride had a significant, lower risk of asthenia, dizziness, and postural hypotension.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Finasteride improves long-term urinary symptoms versus placebo, but is less effective than doxazosin. Long-term combination therapy with alpha blockers (doxazosin, terazosin) improves symptoms significantly better than finasteride monotherapy. Finasteride + doxazosin improves symptoms equally - and clinically - to doxazosin alone. In comparison to doxazosin, finasteride + doxazosin appears to improve urinary symptoms only in men with medium (25 to < 40 mL) or large prostates (≥ 40 mL), but not in men with small prostates (25 mL).Comparing short to long-term therapy, finasteride does not improve symptoms significantly better than placebo at the short term, but in the long term it does, although the magnitude of differences was very small (from < 1.0 point to 2.2 points). Doxazosin improves symptoms better than finasteride both short and long term, with the magnitude of differences ∼2.0 points and 1.0 point, respectively. Finasteride + doxazosin improves scores versus finasteride alone at both short and long term, with mean differences ∼2.0 points for both time points. Finasteride + doxazosin versus doxazosin improves scores equally for short and long term.Drug-related adverse effects for finasteride are rare; nevertheless, men taking finasteride are at increased risk for impotence, erectile dysfunction, decreased libido, and ejaculation disorder, versus placebo. Versus doxazosin, which has higher rates of dizziness, postural hypotension, and asthenia, men taking finasteride are at increased risk for impotence, erectile dysfunction, decreased libido, and ejaculation disorder. Finasteride significantly reduces asthenia, postural hypotension, and dizziness versus terazosin. Finasteride significantly lowers the risk of asthenia, dizziness, ejaculation disorder, and postural hypotension, versus finasteride + terazosin.

Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

• To review the evidence in support of the effectiveness of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

• Relevant studies were identified by performing a literature search using MEDLINE® and The Cochrane Library®. The criteria used during the search included randomized, placebo-controlled trials of treatment for LUTS secondary to BPH using the International Prostate Symptom Score as an outcome measure.

RESULTS

• Four trials that included a total of 1928 patients met the inclusion criteria. All four studies showed a statistically significant difference in the International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life and erectile function in favour of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors. • No study showed a statistically significant improvement of the maximum urinary flow. • Meta-analysis of the results was not possible because of heterogeneity across the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

• Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors used in the clinical setting can significantly improve LUTS secondary to BPH, erectile function and quality of life. Maximum urinary flow improvement is not statistically significant. • Future research should focus on pathophysiological principles and cost analysis.

The outcome of radical prostatectomy for patients with prostate cancer and acute urinary retention

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the fourth most commonly diagnosed medical condition in older men. As a consequence, acute urinary retention can occur in patients with preoperative prostate cancer. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy as a treatment modality for prostate cancer was designed to decrease operative morbidity and minimize long-term morbidity such as incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Three patients with prostate cancer coexisting with a BPH-related urinary retention managed with a clean intermittent catheterization (patient #1), and an indwelling Foley catheter (patients #2 and #3), were treated with a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. After the procedure, the patients were able to void spontaneously, with good urine flow and reasonable bladder emptying.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia

This article reviews the epidemiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), evaluation of patients with lower urinary tract symptomatology (LUTS), and management of patients with BPH and LUTS. The evaluation includes history and physical examination, laboratory testing, and specialized studies. The management includes medical and surgical options. Medical options include alpha-1-adrenergic receptor blockers, 5alpha-reductase inhibitors, and combinations of these and other medications. Surgical options include endoscopic procedures, open procedures, and laser procedures.

Botulinum neurotoxin A for benign prostatic hyperplasia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The injection of botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) into the prostate represents an alternative, minimal invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), which gained the interest of urologists during the last years, although it is not yet licensed. The purpose of this review is to summarize the mechanisms through which BoNT-A could inhibit the progression of BPH and eliminate the lower urinary tract symptoms according to the findings of animal studies. Furthermore, we review clinical studies to report the efficacy and safety of intraprostatic BoNT-A injection according to various injection protocols.

RECENT FINDINGS

The experimental studies report induced relaxation of the prostate, atrophy, and reduction in its size through inhibition of the trophic effect of the autonomic system on the prostate gland. Also, a possible mechanism of reduction in lower urinary tract symptoms might take place through inhibition of sensory afferents from the prostate to the spinal cord. Clinical studies report symptomatic relief and improvement in the measured parameters during the follow-up period, whereas local or systematic side-effects are rare.

SUMMARY

We should recognize that, at present, this therapy is still experimental. Although the results of the clinical studies are encouraging, the level of evidence is low. Clearly, we need large-scale, clinical, placebo-controlled, randomized studies, including long-term surveillance to document the evidence of this therapy and, eventually, to register BoNT-A for this indication.

Effects of short-term dutasteride and Serenoa repens on perioperative bleeding and microvessel density in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate

OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the effects of short term use of dutasteride and Serenoarepens before transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) on the amount of intraoperative blood loss and microvessel density (MVD) of prostatic stromal and suburethral tissues in the patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study involved 75 male patients who planned to have a TURP. The patients were randomly divided into three groups. The control group comprised 21 patients. Group 2 comprised 27 patients who used dutasteride 5 mg/day, and group 3 comprised 27 patients who used S. repens 160 mg/day for 5 weeks before the operation. The amount of intraoperative haemorrhage was calculated. Total blood loss, total blood loss/time, total blood loss/weight of resected tissue and total blood loss/weight/time were calculated for each patient and all were recorded. Sections from the prostatic stromal and suburethral tissues were examined for suburethral and prostatic MVD.

RESULTS

The total amount of intraoperative blood loss, total blood loss/time, total blood loss/weight of resected tissue, total blood loss/weight/time, serum haemoglobin level change, prostatic MVD and suburethral MVD of the groups were compared. No significant statistical differences were found between the groups for any of these variables (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Dutasteride and S. repens therapies were not superior to control in terms of the decrease in total blood loss during TURP. Moreover, MVD showed no statistical differences in the treatment groups compared with the control group.

Effect of finasteride on serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and on prostate of hamster Mesocricetus auratus (hMa)

PURPOSE

Evaluate the effects of finasteride on the serum PSA and on the prostate of hamster-Mesocricetus auratus(hMa).

METHODS

Twenty hMa male adults were split in groups control and experimental (n=10). Animals of the experimental group received 7.14ng/mL of finasteride, subcutaneously (SC) on the back three times per week, during 90 days. The finasteride dose was equivalent to 5.0mg administered to a 70kg man. At the end of the experiment the mean age for the animals in the control group was 15.2 + or - 1.13 months and for the experimental group was 17.7 + or - 0.67 months. There was a statistically significant difference between mean ages of both groups (t value=5.98; p=0.001). The animals of the control group weighted 129.0 + or - 18.8g and the experimental group weighted 145.0 + or - 15.5g, t=1.88 e p=0.0514. The serum PSA was assessed through ELISA method. Prostates of those animals were collected and processed to histology and morphometry: the diameter of the acinous glands and the acinous epithelium, apoptosis, AgNORs and cellularity were assessed in both groups.

RESULTS

Serum PSA decreased in the experimental group, 0.003ng/mL versus 0.763ng/mL, H= 7.982 e p= 0.0047. Decrease in the acinous area occurred in animals that received finasteride, 238.000 + or - 24.600 microm(2) versus 398.600 + or - 55.320 microm(2); t= 2.653; p= 0.0122. A remarkable decrease in the area of the acinous epithelium occurred in the animals that received finasteride, 111.900 + or -12.820 microm(2) versus 160.400 + or - 18.430 microm(2) t= 2.162; p= 0.0361. AgNORs were less expressed in finasteride treated animals, 2.846 + or - 0.877 versus 3.68 + or - 1.07 argyrophilic clusters for microm(2), p= < 0.0001. Apoptosis was more intense in the experimental group, 53.62 + or - 1.389 than in controls, 14.76 + or - 2.137, p= 0.0408. However, there was no statistical difference in the cellularity between both groups, 74.75 + or - 5.5 cells, in controls versus 65.07 + or - 13.24, in treated animals, p=0.5105.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of finasteride decreased serum PSA and several histological parameters of the Hamster's prostate, such as lumen area, acinous and epithelium area, and AgNORs expression. Finasteride increased apoptosis in the prostate acinous cells although no significant difference in the cellularity could be found between the two groups of animals under study.

Tamsulosin versus terazosin for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review

The effectiveness and safety of tamsulosin and terazosin for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) was evaluated by literature review. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Chinese biomedicine literature database (CBM), reference lists of reports, and reviews were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or quasi-RCTs of tamsulosin versus terazosin in BPH. Twelve studies involving 2,816 men were included. Outcomes included international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL), maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)), average urinary flow rate (Q(ave)), residual volume, prostate volume, and adverse effect (dizziness, severe hypotension, dry mouth). Relative risk was calculated for dichotomous data. Sensitivity analyses assessed the influence of baseline symptom severity. We found that tamsulosin is better than terazosin when assessed by IPSS (weighted mean difference (WMD)=-1.24 95% CI [- 1.98, -0.51], there was no significant difference between the two groups in QOL (WMD=0.04 95% CI [-0.16, 0.24]), Qmax (WMD=-0.38 95% CI [-1.18, 0.41]), Q(ave) (WMD=-0.39 95% CI [- 0.84, 0.06]), residual volume (WMD=-4.32 95% CI [-10.96, 2.33]), and prostate volume (WMD=-0.28 95% CI [- 3.37, 2.81]). Fewer patients receiving tamsulosin experienced dizziness (relative risk (RR) -0.38 95% CI [0.30, 0.48]), severe hypotension (RR=0.16 95% CI [0.04, 0.68]), and dry mouth (RR=0.14 95% CI [0.03, 0.77]), compared with patients receiving terazosin. Many of the high quality RCTs showed beneficial effects of tamsulosin in terms of improving IPSS. However, whether tamsulosin proves more efficacious than terazosin in long term therapy requires confirmation by additional large sample, high quality trials.

Cost effectiveness of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors for the prevention of prostate cancer in multiple patient populations

BACKGROUND

Although 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) have demonstrated that they reduce the risk of prostate cancer (PCa), they have not demonstrated cost effectiveness in the patient populations in which they have been examined.

OBJECTIVE

A decision-analytic model was created to explore economic benefits from a third-party payer perspective of the use of 5ARIs in preventing PCa in men with different risk factors for developing the disease.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to simulate a cohort of men annually through health states (e.g. healthy male, benign prostatic hyperplasia [BPH], PCa, PCa recurrence) over a man's lifetime. Men with risk factors were treated with a 5ARI and compared with patients given no chemoprevention. Men from the general population were examined along with higher-risk men who had been referred to a PCa centre. Baseline risk was estimated via published risk data, risk factor analyses and risk equations. Clinical efficacy, morality, costs and utilities were obtained from published literature. Outcomes of the model included number of prostate cancers, incremental costs, incremental QALYs, incremental cost per QALY and number needed to treat. Along with sensitivity and scenario analyses, a validation of outcomes was performed. All costs were valued in $US, year 2009 values. Costs were discounted at 3% per annum.

RESULTS

Men receiving 5ARIs benefited through a reduction in the number of PCas. Assuming a cost-effectiveness threshold of $US50 000 per QALY, chemoprevention with 5ARIs was cost effective ($US37 900 per QALY) in men from the general population who were aged 50 years with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and who were aged 50 years with PCa family history and elevated PSA ($US31 065 per QALY). Chemoprevention with 5ARIs was not cost effective in men aged 50 years with no additional risk factors, men aged 50 years with abnormal digital rectal examinations (DREs), and men aged 50 years with a family history ($US86 511, $US85 577 and $US84 950 per QALY, respectively). In higher-risk men, chemoprevention could be expected to be cost effective ($US18 490 to $US11 816 per QALY, depending on risk scenario). Results were sensitive to changes in utilities, assumed PCa risk reduction with 5ARIs, and patient age.

CONCLUSION

When considering common risk factors associated with PCa, prevention with 5ARIs is expected to be cost effective in 50-year-old men with elevated PSA. As a man's risk increases, the cost effectiveness of 5ARI chemoprevention improves.

Current status of 5alpha-reductase inhibitors in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms and BPH

PURPOSE

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a progressive disease that is commonly associated with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and might result in complications, such as acute urinary retention and BPH-related surgery. Therefore, the goals of therapy for BPH are not only to improve LUTS in terms of symptoms and urinary flow, but also to identify those patients at a risk of unfavorable disease progression and to optimize their management. This article reviews the current status of therapy with 5alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs), namely fiasteride and dutasteride, for men with LUTS and BPH.

METHOD

Data from key randomized controlled trials (Oxford level 1b) on the use of 5ARIs are analyzed.

RESULTS

The efficacy of 5ARIs either as monotherapy or in combination with alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists in the management of LUTS and the impact of monotherapy and combined therapy on BPH progression are discussed. Further promises, including the withdrawal of the alpha-blocker from the combined medical treatment and the potential clinical implications from the use of 5ARIs for prostate cancer chemoprevention in patients receiving 5ARIs for symptomatic BPH are highlighted.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence shows that 5ARIs are effective in treating LUTS and preventing disease progression and represent a recommended option in treatment guidelines for men who have moderate to severe LUTS and enlarged prostates.

Drug treatment of urological symptoms: estimating the magnitude of unmet need in a community-based sample

OBJECTIVE

To examine, in a community-based sample, the use of prescription drugs for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH), overactive bladder, erectile dysfunction, urinary incontinence, and painful bladder syndrome; and to determine whether the use of recommended medications varied by sociodemographics, symptom severity, access to care, and other factors.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In a cross-sectional analysis of data obtained from 5503 men and women residents participating in the Boston Area Community Health Survey of Boston, MA, urological symptoms were ascertained by in-person interviews conducted during 2002-2005, using validated symptom scales. Medication use in the past 4 weeks was captured using a combination of drug-inventory methods and self-report.

RESULTS

Compared to the prevalence of symptoms, the prevalence of use of medications for urological conditions was very low among men and women. The highest prevalence of use was among men with moderate-to-severe LUTS/BPH symptoms, where 9.6% used recommended drugs. Use of medications did not vary consistently by race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status, but was often associated with symptom severity. More frequent and more recent use of medical care was also associated with greater use of urological medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a small proportion of community-dwelling men and women with urological symptoms are receiving recommended effective drug treatments for urological conditions. While not all persons are candidates for drug treatment, our results suggest that there is a substantial unmet need in the general population.

Association of polymorphisms in CYP19A1 and CYP3A4 genes with lower urinary tract symptoms, prostate volume, uroflow and PSA in a population-based sample

PURPOSE

The known importance of testosterone for the development of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) prompted us to test the hypothesis whether polymorphisms of two genes (CYP19A1 and CYP3A4) involved in testosterone metabolism are associated with clinical BPH-parameters.

METHODS

A random sample of the population-based Herne lower urinary tract symptoms cohort was analysed. All these men underwent a detailed urological work-up. Two polymorphisms in the CYP19A1 gene [rs700518 in exon 4 (A57G); rs10046 at the 3'UTR(C268T)] and one in the 3'UTR of CYP3A4 [rs2740574 (A392G)] were determined by TaqMan assay from genomic DNA of peripheral blood. These polymorphisms were correlated to clinical and laboratory BPH-parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 392 men (65.4 ± 7.0 years; 52-79 years) were analysed. Mean International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS; 7.5), Q (max) (15.4 ml/s), prostate volume (31 ml) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) (1.8 ng/ml) indicated a typical elderly population. Both polymorphisms in the CYP19A1 gene were not correlated to age, IPSS, Q (max), prostate volume and post-void residual volume. Serum PSA was higher in men carrying the heterozygous rs10046 genotype (2.0 ± 0.1 ng/ml) than in those with the CC-genotype (1.7 ± 0.2 ng/ml, P = 0.012). Men carrying one a mutated allele of the CYP3A4 gene had smaller prostates (27.0 ± 2.0 vs. 32 ± 0.8 ml, P = 0.02) and lower PSA levels (1.6 ± 0.3 vs. 1.9 ± 0.1 ng/ml).

CONCLUSIONS

The inconsistent associations observed herein and for other gene polymorphisms warrant further studies. In general, the data regarding the association of gene polymorphism to BPH-parameters suggest that this disease is caused by multiple rather than a single genetic variant. A rigorous patient selection based on anatomo-pathological and hormonal profile may possible reduce the number of confounders for future studies thus enabling a more detailed assessment of the association between genetic factors and BPH-parameters.

The effects of lovastatin on conventional medical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms with finasteride

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether or not statins have any impact on the progression of components of benign prostatic hyperplasia (lower urinary tract symptoms severity, prostate volume and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) when combined with other agents inhibiting growth of prostate cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a preliminary, clinical study. Eligible patients were aged > 50 yrs, with International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) between 9 and 19, total prostate volume (TPV) >40 mL, and serum PSA > 1.5 ng/mL. Patients were divided in two groups: those with and those without lipidemia. After selection, eligible BPH patients with lipidemia (n = 18) were prescribed lovastatin 80 mg daily and finasteride 5 mg daily, while eligible patients without lipidemia (n = 15) were prescribed only finasteride 5 mg daily. IPSS, TPV and serum PSA were evaluated at end point (4 months).

RESULTS

There was no difference between the two groups on the primary end point of mean change from baseline in IPSS (p = 0.69), TPV (p = 0.90) and PSA (p = 0.16) after 4 months of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term lovastatin treatment does not seem to have any effect on IPSS, TPV and PSA in men with prostatic enlargement due to presumed BPH.

Therapeutic options in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Current theraputic options for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are reviewed. Therapeutic options for mild lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), as defined by the American Urological Association, are generally treated medically. Moderate to severe LUTS can be treated medically or with surgical therapy. Current medical and surgical treatments for LUTS secondary to BPH are reviewed and evolving treatments are explored.

Impact of delaying 5-alpha reductase inhibitor therapy in men on alpha-blocker therapy to treat BPH: assessment of acute urinary retention and prostate-related surgery

OBJECTIVE

Pharmacologic treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) commonly includes alpha-blockers (ABs) and 5alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs). Many clinicians use ABs for rapid symptom control and 5ARIs to modify long-term disease progression. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical impact of delayed 5ARI therapy in patients treated with AB for lower urinary tract symptoms.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Using two nationally representative databases, two retrospective analyses were conducted including patients aged > or =50 years treated for BPH between 2000 and 2007. Clinical outcomes for those using add-on 5ARI therapy early (within 30 days of initiating AB) and late (>30 days after initiating AB) were compared. Likelihood of clinical progression, defined as the presence of acute urinary retention (AUR) and prostate surgery, was assessed over 1 year after AB initiation, and modeled as a function of the treatment cohorts and the following baseline covariates: AUR, BPH stage, Charlson Comorbidity Index, age, and number of unique diagnosis codes, unique non-BPH-related classes of prescriptions filled, and specialty care.

RESULTS

Of 6896 men included in the analyses, approximately 60% initiated 5ARI therapy within 30 days of AB therapy (the early cohort). Patients in the early cohort were less likely to have clinical progression. Each 30-day delay in starting 5ARIs resulted in an increased likelihood of overall clinical progression (average 21.1%), AUR (average 18.6%), and prostate-related surgery (average 26.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that delaying 5ARI therapy in men with BPH increases the risk of AUR and prostate surgery.

LIMITATIONS

Confounding factors, such as symptom severity and prostate volume, may have influenced the findings of the study.

Alpha blockers prior to removal of a catheter for acute urinary retention in adult men

BACKGROUND

Acute urinary retention is a urological emergency in men and requires urgent catheterisation. Any intervention which aims at increasing the rate of a successful trial without a catheter following an acute urinary retention episode would be considered potentially beneficial. Alpha blockers relax prostatic smooth muscle cells thereby decreasing the resistance to urinary flow and by doing so improve urinary symptoms.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of alpha blockers on successful resumption of micturition following removal of a urethral urinary catheter after an episode of acute urinary retention in men.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register (11 February 2009) and the reference lists of relevant articles. No language or other restrictions were imposed on the searches.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised and quasi-randomised clinical trials of alpha blockers for trial without a urethral catheter following an episode of acute urinary retention in men were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both review authors independently examined all the citations and abstracts derived from the search strategy. Any disagreement about trial selection and inclusion was resolved by discussion. A third independent judgement was sought where disagreement persisted. Both review authors extracted independently, cross-checked and processed the data as described in the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook (Higgins 2008).

MAIN RESULTS

Five randomised clinical trials were eligible for inclusion in this review. All five trials compared alpha blockers versus placebo. In four trials alpha blockers were used between 24 to 72 hours (in one study up to a maximum of eight days) before trial without a catheter (TWOC); in one trial alpha blockers were used for eight days prior to trial without a catheter. Four trials tested alfuzosin and one trial tested tamsulosin. Four trials favoured alpha blockers and one trial favoured placebo. Overall rates of successful TWOC tended to favour alpha blockers over placebo. This was statistically significant (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.64) irrespective of the alpha blocker used (alfuzosin: RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.56; tamsulosin: RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.97).With regard to causing fewer vasodilatation-related side effects (for example hypotension, dizziness), two studies favoured placebo and one favoured alpha blockers. Overall side effects were low for both placebo and alpha blockers. Failure rates were high and mainly caused by the need for re-catheterisation rather than vasodilatation-related side effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The limited available evidence suggests that alpha blockers increase success rates of TWOC. Alpha blocker side effects are low and comparable to placebo. It is uncertain whether alpha blockers reduce the risk of recurrent urinary retention and need for prostate surgery. The cost effectiveness and recommended duration of alpha blocker treatment after successful TWOC remains unknown. There are a lack of internationally agreed outcome measures for what constitutes successful TWOC. This makes meta-analysis difficult. More randomised clinical trials are needed to address these issues.

Effect of the dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor, dutasteride, on serum testosterone and body mass index in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of dutasteride on serum testosterone level and body mass index (BMI) in men who received medical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 120 patients with BPH were randomized to three treatment groups: tamsulosin 0.2 mg/day (alpha-blocker group), dutasteride 0.5 mg/day (dutasteride group), or tamsulosin 0.2 mg plus dutasteride 0.5 mg/day (combination group) for 1 year. For all patients the BMI and serum testosterone levels were checked at baseline and after 1 year of treatment.

RESULTS

Among the evaluable 107 patients, the dutasteride (33) and combination groups (37) had significantly greater increases in serum testosterone level (16.3% and 15%, respectively) than the alpha-blocker group (37; 0.3%) after 1 year of treatment (both P < 0.001). When analysed by baseline serum testosterone tertile, the increases in serum testosterone level among the dutasteride and combination group were greatest in the lowest tertile. For BMI, the dutasteride and combination group had mean decreases of 0.17 and 0.20 kg/m(2), respectively, at 1 year, whereas the alpha-blocker group had a mean increase of 0.04 kg/m(2). The decreases in BMI for the dutasteride and combination group were statistically significant only in the lowest tertile (P = 0.048 and 0.010, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that dutasteride treatment in men with BPH led to a significant increase in serum testosterone level and a significant decrease in BMI among those with relatively lower baseline serum testosterone levels.

Differences in initial benign prostatic hyperplasia management between primary care physicians and urologists

PURPOSE

The introduction of efficacious pharmacotherapies has effectively transformed benign prostatic hyperplasia into a chronic disease that requires ongoing medical care. With this transformation primary care physicians have become more involved in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The impact of the increasing role of the primary care physician on the use of benign prostatic hyperplasia related health services remains unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using medical claims from a nonprofit managed care organization. Between 1997 and 2005 we identified incident cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia and the provider responsible for the initial care. We fitted logistic regression models to measure the association between subject receipt of an evaluative process and the treating physician specialty. Furthermore, we examined differences between primary care physicians and urologists with respect to the use of medical therapy.

RESULTS

Less than a third of incident cases received initial care from a urologist. Use of office based procedures and urodynamic tests was exclusive to urology. Urologists performed urinalysis testing and transrectal ultrasonography more frequently than primary care physicians (p <0.001). The odds of having a laboratory study doubled with treatment by a urologist (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.51-2.74). Men seen by a urologist were also more likely to be prescribed a benign prostatic hyperplasia medication (p <0.001). Among those who received medical therapy, prescription of selective alpha-adrenergic blockers, 5alpha-reductase inhibitors and combination therapy was higher among urologists (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

On average, urologists had a higher intensity practice style for benign prostatic hyperplasia than primary care physicians. Further studies are needed to determine how these practice style differences relate to patient clinical outcomes.

Measurement of benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment effects on male sexual function

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the leading cause of lower urinary tract symptoms among the aging male population. Epidemiological, pathophysiological and clinical studies indicate that many of these men also suffer from declining sexual function, especially those undergoing treatment for their BPH-related urinary symptoms. Although urinary symptoms and quality of life may improve with BPH therapy, the resulting effects on sexual function vary by medical, surgical and minimally invasive approaches and have not been consistently reported. As comprehensive, validated instruments to measure male sexual function are now available for routine use in the clinical setting, urologists and primary care providers caring for patients with BPH have the opportunity to monitor both urinary and sexual function before, during and after BPH therapy. Herein, we describe the relationship between BPH and its treatments on male sexual function, the role of new measures for sexual functioning and opportunities for future work to improve the care of men suffering from both maladies.

Key targets of hormonal treatment of prostate cancer. Part 2: the androgen receptor and 5alpha-reductase

OBJECTIVE

The inhibition of 5alpha-reductase (5AR) blocks the synthesis of the most powerful intracellular androgen, dihydrotestosterone (DHT). The prostate has two 5AR isoenzymes (5AR1 and 5AR2) that change in expression and cellular location during the development of prostate cancer and tumour progression. The objective of this review is to provide an understanding of the pharmacological properties and the potential clinical benefits of 5AR inhibition.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed for data obtained from pharmacological, preclinical and clinical studies.

RESULTS

5AR1 expression increases with increasing aggressiveness and extension of malignant prostatic disease. Conversely, 5AR2 expression decreases from benign prostatic tissue to localized prostate cancer. The efficacy of 5AR2 monotherapy with finasteride alone or in combination with an androgen receptor antagonist on more final outcome measures seems to be limited. Combining an androgen receptor antagonist with a 5AR inhibitor in patients with asymptomatic, locally advanced or recurrent prostate cancer might be a reasonable first therapeutic hormonal approach. As plasma testosterone levels are maintained, beneficial effects on quality of life, potency and sexual function are expected. From studies on the dual 5AR inhibitor dutasteride, the drug produces a biochemical response in some men who progressed under androgen-deprivation therapy, and is generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving more potent suppression of intracellular DHT synthesis by 5AR inhibition is expected to provide clinical benefit to patients. Previous studies have shown that 5AR inhibition, by dutasteride in particular, halts/delays the progression of disease, and might even cause regression of disease in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Finasteride in the treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a complex and progressive disease common in aging men. While associated with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms, it may also result in additional serious complications such as refractory hematuria, acute urinary retention, and BPH-related surgery. Medical therapy has been offered as an approach to halt this progression and perhaps reverse the pathophysiology of BPH. While alpha-blockers provide rapid relief in the form of improved flow rate, their effects may not reduce the overall risk of BPH-related complications. 5α-reductase inhibitors were therefore introduced to affect the underlying disease process by inhibiting the enzyme which converts testosterone to dihydrotesterone, the primary androgen involved in normal and abnormal prostate growth. Through this inhibition, prostate size is decreased, thereby reducing the risk of acute urinary retention and BPH-related surgery while providing symptom control. These effects are most pronounced in men with enlarged prostates (>25 mL) who are at the greatest risk of disease progression. This article reviews the literature for finasteride used in the treatment of BPH and provides evidence for its efficacy, safety and tolerability, applicability for combination therapy, and considerations of its effects on prostate cancer risk.

Long-term cost analysis of treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia in Norway

OBJECTIVE

To estimate and compare the costs of dutasteride, finasteride, tamsulosin and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) from a Norwegian health service perspective.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A Markov model was developed to estimate the clinical progression that a cohort of 1000 men would undergo and the care they would receive over 4- and 15.5-year periods. Transitions between health states [BPH symptoms, improvement in symptoms, acute urinary retention (AUR), TURP, prostate cancer and death] were estimated from the published literature and knowledge of the Norwegian healthcare system. Sensitivity analyses were conducted of indirect costs, discount rates, the costs and probabilities of AUR and TURP and the probability of symptom improvement.

RESULTS

The total costs of BPH management for patients initially treated with dutasteride, finasteride, tamsulosin or TURP at 4 years were NOK 13,946 (1703 Euro), NOK 16,111 (1967 Euro), NOK 16,833 (2054 Euro) and NOK 46,309 (5655 Euro), respectively and at 15.5 years NOK 32,137 (3924 Euro), NOK 37,173 (4539 Euro), NOK 40,528 (4946 Euro) and NOK 50,471 (6164 Euro), respectively. One- and multi-way sensitivity analyses did not significantly alter the relative order of the total costs. CONCLUSIONS. Given the conservative nature of the model and the robustness of the sensitivity analysis, it is concluded that dutasteride is less costly than finasteride, TURP or tamsulosin at both 4 and 15.5 years. Therefore, considering cost containment restraints in Norway, dutasteride is an appropriate choice of therapy for patients with moderate/severe symptoms and an enlarged prostate (>30 ml).

The psychometric validation of a US English satisfaction measure for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms

Background

The purpose of the current study was to validate the US English Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM) questionnaire, which measures patient satisfaction with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) treatment and was administered to men with BPH lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) enrolled in a multi-national clinical trial.

Methods

Patients with moderate to severe BPH symptoms completed three disease-specific measures: The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), the BPH Impact Index (BII) and the PPSM, at baseline (after completion of the placebo run-in period) and at every 13-week clinic visit thereafter for the duration of the study treatment period. The PPSM was analysed to assess its variability, reliability and validity.

Results

There were 879 patients included in the analyses, with a mean age of 66.7 years. The PPSM was found to comprise two factors – PPSM-Global and PPSM-Pain, with a Total Score ranging from 7 to 49. It demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranged from .95 to .97) and also demonstrated convergent validity through significant correlations with the IPSS (.48 to .58), IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) item (.41 to .63) and BII (.31 to .45) and known-groups validity against the IPSS, IPSS QoL item and BII.

Conclusion

Results support the use of the PPSM as a measure of satisfaction in BPH patient groups.

Development and external validation of a highly accurate nomogram for the prediction of perioperative mortality after transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia

PURPOSE

Benign prostatic hyperplasia affects 60% of men at the age of 60 years. Transurethral resection of the prostate is the gold standard of therapy. We assessed the 30-day mortality rate after transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia, identified risk factors related to 30-day mortality and developed a model that discriminates among individual 30-day mortality risk levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed development (7,362) and external validation (7,362) of a multivariable logistic regression model predicting the individual probability of 30-day mortality after transurethral resection of the prostate based on an administrative data set (Quebec Health Plan) of 14,724 patients 43 to 99 years old treated between January 1, 1989 and December 31, 2000.

RESULTS

Overall 30-day mortality occurred in 58 patients (0.4%) undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate. On univariable analyses increasing age (p <0.001) and increasing Charlson comorbidity index (p <0.001) were statistically significant predictors of 30-day mortality after transurethral resection of the prostate. Conversely annual surgical volume was not. On multivariable analyses age (p <0.001) and Charlson comorbidity index (p <0.001) reached independent predictor status. The accuracy of the age and Charlson comorbidity index based nomogram that predicts the individual probability of 30-day mortality after transurethral resection of the prostate was 83% in the external validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Age and Charlson comorbidity index are important determinants of 30-day mortality after transurethral resection of the prostate. The combination of these parameters allows an 83% accurate prediction of individual 30-day mortality risk after transurethral resection of the prostate. Despite limitations such as the need for additional external validations and possibly the need for inclusion of clinical parameters, the use of the current model is warranted for the purpose of informed consent before transurethral resection of the prostate and/or for patient counseling.

A broader role for 5ARIs in prostate disease? Existing evidence and emerging benefits

5ARIs are recommended for men who have moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Studies have confirmed the utility of combining 5ARIs with alpha-blockers; the MTOPS study showed that risk of overall clinical progression was significantly reduced after 4.5 years with combination therapy (finasteride/doxazosin) in comparison with either monotherapy, while the ongoing CombAT trial (dutasteride/tamsulosin) has for the first time shown benefit in improving symptoms for combination therapy over monotherapies within 12 months of treatment. Data also suggest roles for 5ARIs in prostate cancer. Several studies indicate that treatment with a 5ARI improves the performance of PSA testing for identifying men with prostate cancer, while the PCPT showed a significant reduction in the risk of developing prostate cancer with finasteride. However, widespread use of finasteride in this setting has been tempered by an apparent increase in high-grade disease observed in the study. The ongoing REDUCE study will provide further insight into prostate cancer prevention with 5ARIs. 5ARI-containing regimens may have utility as less aggressive treatment options for patients who only have rising PSA after definitive local therapy, and in patients with disease resistant to androgen deprivation therapy who have PSA progression. Current evidence therefore shows that 5ARIs are effective in treating LUTS/BPE and preventing disease progression, and may also have a role in the prevention of prostate cancer. The overlap between BPE and prostate cancer may allow a more unified approach to managing these conditions, with 5ARIs having a central role.

Long-term outcome of patients with a successful trial without catheter, after treatment with an alpha-adrenergic receptor blocker for acute urinary retention caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

To perform a retrospective review of long-term outcome for patients with a first episode of acute urinary retention (AUR) who could void successfully after the initial trial without catheter (TWOC) after treatment with an alpha-adrenergic receptor blocker (AR blocker).

METHODS

The records of 248 patients who presented with a first episode of AUR secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and who could void successfully after the initial TWOC following treatment with an AR blocker were reviewed during the period January 1998 to December 2001. The characteristics of the patients and the subsequent outcomes were recorded. The primary outcome assessed was failed medical treatment within the five-year follow-up period. Factors correlated with the primary outcome were also assessed.

RESULTS

For these 248 patients, the median follow-up time was 33.0 months (range 0-96 months). The percentage of patients with failed medical treatment at 6, 12, 24, and 60 months was 11.6, 14.3, 28.4, and 50.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that only a prostate size >50 ml and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level during AUR >10 ng/dl were significant predictors of subsequent requirement for surgical intervention after a successful TWOC.

CONCLUSIONS

Although AR blockers increased the success rate of TWOC, approximately half of the patients in this study still required additional intervention within five years. By using appropriate selection criteria, such as a large prostate size (>50 ml) or high serum PSA level during AUR (>10 microg/l), patients who are at greater risk of TWOC failure can be identified, and earlier surgical intervention can be offered to them.