Variability in transfusion practice for coronary artery bypass surgery persists despite national consensus guidelines: a 24-institution study. Institutions of the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group

Lowering the hemoglobin threshold for transfusion in coronary artery bypass procedures: effect on patient outcome

BACKGROUND

There is controversy regarding the application of transfusion triggers in cardiac surgery. The goal of this study was to determine if lowering the hemoglobin threshold for red cell (RBC) transfusion to 8 g per dL after coronary artery bypass graft surgery would reduce blood use without adversely affecting patient outcome.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Consecutive patients (n = 428) undergoing elective primary coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomly assigned to two groups: study patients (n = 212) received RBC transfusions in the postoperative period if the Hb level was < 8 g per dL or if predetermined clinical conditions required RBC support, and control patients (n = 216) were treated according to individual physician's orders (hemoglobin levels < 9 g/dL as the institutional guideline). Multiple demographic, procedure-related, transfusion, laboratory, and outcome data were analyzed. Questionnaires were administered for patient self-assessment of fatigue and anemia.

RESULTS

Preoperative and operative clinical characteristics, as well as the intraoperative transfusion rate, were similar for both groups. There was a significant difference between the postoperative RBC transfusion rates in study (0.9 +/- 1.5 RBC units) and control (1.4 +/- 1.8 RBC units) groups (p = 0.005). There was no difference in clinical outcome, including morbidity and mortality rates, in the two groups; group scores for self-assessment of fatigue and anemia were also similar.

CONCLUSIONS

A lower Hb threshold of 8 g per dL does not adversely affect patient outcome. Moreover, RBC resources can be saved without increased risk to the patient.

Safety and efficacy of shed mediastinal blood transfusion after cardiac surgery: a multicenter observational study. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficacy and safety of shed mediastinal blood (SMB) transfusion in preventing allogenic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion.

DESIGN

An observational clinical study.

SETTING

Twelve US academic medical centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Six hundred seventeen patients undergoing elective primary coronary artery bypass grafting.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were administered SMB transfusion or not, according to institutional and individual practice, without random assignment.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The independent effect of SMB transfusion on postoperative RBC transfusion was examined by multivariable modeling. Potential complications of SMB transfusion, such as bleeding and infection, were examined. Three hundred twelve of the study patients (51%) received postoperative SMB transfusion (mean volume, 554 +/- 359 mL). Patients transfused with SMB had significantly lower volumes of RBC transfusion than those not receiving SMB (0.86 +/- 1.50 v 1.08 +/- 1.65 units; p < 0.05). However, multivariable analysis showed that SMB transfusion was not predictive of postoperative RBC transfusion. Demographic factors (older age, female sex), institution, and postoperative events (greater chest tube drainage, lower hemoglobin level on arrival to the intensive care unit, and use of inotropes) were significant predictors of RBC transfusion. The volume of chest tube drainage on the operative day (707 +/- 392 v 673 +/- 460 mL; p = 0.30), reoperation for hemorrhage (3.1% v2.5%; p = 0.68), and overall frequency of infection (5.8% v 6.6%; p = 0.81) were similar between patients receiving and not receiving SMB, respectively. However, in patients who did not receive allogenic RBC transfusion, there was a significantly greater frequency of wound infection in the SMB group (3.6% v0%; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that SMB is ineffective as a blood conservation method and may be associated with a greater frequency of wound infection.

Thromboelastography-guided transfusion algorithm reduces transfusions in complex cardiac surgery

Transfusion therapy after cardiac surgery is empirically guided, partly due to a lack of specific point-of-care hemostasis monitors. In a randomized, blinded, prospective trial, we studied cardiac surgical patients at moderate to high risk of transfusion. Patients were randomly assigned to either a thromboelastography (TEG)-guided transfusion algorithm (n = 53) or routine transfusion therapy (n = 52) for intervention after cardiopulmonary bypass. Coagulation tests, TEG variables, mediastinal tube drainage, and transfusions were compared at multiple time points. There were no demographic or hemostatic test result differences between groups, and all patients were given prophylactic antifibrinolytic therapy. Intraoperative transfusion rates did not differ, but there were significantly fewer postoperative and total transfusions in the TEG group. The proportion of patients receiving fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) was 4 of 53 in the TEG group compared with 16 of 52 in the control group (P < 0.002). Patients receiving platelets were 7 of 53 in the TEG group compared with 15 of 52 in the control group (P < 0.05). Patients in the TEG group also received less volume of FFP (36 +/- 142 vs 217 +/- 463 mL; P < 0.04). Mediastinal tube drainage was not statistically different 6, 12, or 24 h postoperatively. Point-of-care coagulation monitoring using TEG resulted in fewer transfusions in the postoperative period. We conclude that the reduction in transfusions may have been due to improved hemostasis in these patients who had earlier and specific identification of the hemostasis abnormality and thus received more appropriate intraoperative transfusion therapy. These data support the use of TEG in an algorithm to guide transfusion therapy in complex cardiac surgery.

IMPLICATIONS

Transfusion of allogeneic blood products is common during complex cardiac surgical procedures. In a prospective, randomized trial, we compared a transfusion algorithm using point-of-care coagulation testing with routine laboratory testing, and found the algorithm to be effective in reducing transfusion requirements.

Thromboelastography-guided transfusion algorithm reduces transfusions in complex cardiac surgery

Transfusion therapy after cardiac surgery is empirically guided, partly due to a lack of specific point-of-care hemostasis monitors. In a randomized, blinded, prospective trial, we studied cardiac surgical patients at moderate to high risk of transfusion. Patients were randomly assigned to either a thromboelastography (TEG)-guided transfusion algorithm (n = 53) or routine transfusion therapy (n = 52) for intervention after cardiopulmonary bypass. Coagulation tests, TEG variables, mediastinal tube drainage, and transfusions were compared at multiple time points. There were no demographic or hemostatic test result differences between groups, and all patients were given prophylactic antifibrinolytic therapy. Intraoperative transfusion rates did not differ, but there were significantly fewer postoperative and total transfusions in the TEG group. The proportion of patients receiving fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) was 4 of 53 in the TEG group compared with 16 of 52 in the control group (P < 0.002). Patients receiving platelets were 7 of 53 in the TEG group compared with 15 of 52 in the control group (P < 0.05). Patients in the TEG group also received less volume of FFP (36 +/- 142 vs 217 +/- 463 mL; P < 0.04). Mediastinal tube drainage was not statistically different 6, 12, or 24 h postoperatively. Point-of-care coagulation monitoring using TEG resulted in fewer transfusions in the postoperative period. We conclude that the reduction in transfusions may have been due to improved hemostasis in these patients who had earlier and specific identification of the hemostasis abnormality and thus received more appropriate intraoperative transfusion therapy. These data support the use of TEG in an algorithm to guide transfusion therapy in complex cardiac surgery.

IMPLICATIONS

Transfusion of allogeneic blood products is common during complex cardiac surgical procedures. In a prospective, randomized trial, we compared a transfusion algorithm using point-of-care coagulation testing with routine laboratory testing, and found the algorithm to be effective in reducing transfusion requirements.

Hematocrit value on intensive care unit entry influences the frequency of Q-wave myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass grafting. The Institutions of the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia (McSPI) Research Group

OBJECTIVES

No data exist regarding "the best" hematocrit value after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Transfusion practice varies, because neither an optimal hematocrit value nor a uniform transfusion trigger criterion has been determined.

METHODS

To investigate the optimal hematocrit value, we studied 2202 patients undergoing coronary bypass. The hematocrit value on entry into the intensive care unit (IHCT) was categorized into three groups: high (> or = 34%), medium (25% to 33%), and low (< or = 24%). Characteristics and adverse events (outcomes) were compared, and the effect of IHCT on the risk of myocardial infarction was determined by logistic regression.

RESULTS

High IHCT (> or = 34%) was associated with an increased rate of myocardial infarction (8.3% vs 5.5% vs 3.6%; p < or = 0.03, high, medium vs low) and with more severe left ventricular dysfunction (11.7% vs 7.4% and 5.7%; p=0.006, high, medium vs low). Mortality rate increased with higher IHCT when all the high-risk subgroups were combined (8.6% vs 4.5% vs 3.2%; p < 0.001, high, medium vs low). By multivariate analysis, IHCT remained the most significant predictor of adverse outcomes (relative risk high vs low 2.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.04 to 4.76). No characteristic, event, medication, or transfusion therapy confounded the relationship between IHCT and outcome.

CONCLUSION

High IHCT is associated with a higher rate of myocardial infarction and is an independent predictor of infarction. On the basis of the risk of myocardial infarction, there is no rationale for transfusion to an arbitrary level after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Tranexamic acid and aprotinin reduce postoperative bleeding and transfusions during primary coronary revascularization

We evaluated the blood conservation effects of tranexamic acid (TA) or aprotinin administered before and during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of 150 adult patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Patients received either TA (2 g) or large-dose aprotinin (7 million KIU). Thirty additional untreated patients otherwise managed in a similar fashion were included from a recently completed study for comparison of outcomes. Demographic, medical, surgical, laboratory, mediastinal chest tube drainage (MCTD), transfusion, and outcome data were collected. Allogeneic blood product administration was tightly controlled. The demographic, medical, and surgical characteristics did not significantly differ between the two therapy groups. The median postoperative MCTD loss in the TA group did not significantly differ from that in the aprotinin-treated group (708 vs 600 mL). The percentage of patients that received no allogeneic blood products was 25% for the TA group and 27% for the aprotinin group (P = not significant). The median number of allogeneic blood products administered to the TA group (0 U) did not significantly differ from that administered to the aprotinin group (0 U). The percentage of patients with excessive MCTD (>1000 mL/24 h) did not significantly differ between groups (19% and 17%, respectively). In comparison, the control group had a significantly greater (P < 0.05) median MCTD (1020 mL), median allogeneic blood product exposure (4.5 U), and incidence of excessive MCTD (66%) and transfusion therapy (66%). These data help to support the use of pharmacologic methods to improve clinically relevant indicators of blood conservation for primary CPB procedures. Furthermore, the data show that TA is equivalent to aprotinin for blood conservation in patients at risk of excessive post-CPB bleeding and transfusion therapy.

IMPLICATIONS

In a randomized, blind trial, we evaluated the effects of tranexamic acid or aprotinin on blood conservation after primary cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Both drugs were equally effective in reducing blood loss, the incidence of transfusion, and the amount of blood products transfused compared with placebon.

Future directions in utilization review: the role of transfusion algorithms

Transfusion practice guidelines and retrospective utilization review have been ineffective in curtailing the inappropriate use of blood and blood products, particularly in cardiac surgical patients. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are at increased risk for excessive perioperative blood loss requiring transfusion of blood products. Recent evaluations have focused on the use of point-of-care coagulation assays for patient-specific therapy. Blood component administration in patients with excessive post-CPB bleeding is generally empiric, in part related to the times required to perform of laboratory-based tests. Methods are now available for rapid, on-site assessment of coagulation assays to allow appropriate, targeted therapy for acquired hemostatic abnormalities. Recent studies indicate that a rapid evaluation of thrombocytopenia and coagulation factor deficiencies, coupled with transfusion algorithms, can facilitate the optimal administration of transfusion-based therapy in patients who exhibit excessive bleeding after CPB. The use of point-of-care assays and transfusion algorithms may provide an effective concurrent method of utilization review of blood products in the surgical setting.