Antianginal and antiischemic effects of ivabradine, an I(f) inhibitor, in stable angina: a randomized, double-blind, multicentered, placebo-controlled trial

Physiology and pharmacology of the cardiac pacemaker (“funny”) current

First described over a quarter of a century ago, the cardiac pacemaker "funny" (I(f)) current has been extensively characterized since, and its role in cardiac pacemaking has been thoroughly demonstrated. A similar current, termed I(h), was later described in different types of neurons, where it has a variety of functions and contributes to the control of cell excitability and plasticity. I(f) is an inward current activated by both voltage hyperpolarization and intracellular cAMP. In the heart, as well as generating spontaneous activity, f-channels mediate autonomic-dependent modulation of heart rate: beta-adrenergic stimulation accelerates, and vagal stimulation slows, cardiac rate by increasing and decreasing, respectively, the intracellular cAMP concentration and, consequently, the f-channel degree of activation. Four isoforms of hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels have been cloned more recently and shown to be the molecular correlates of native f-channels in the heart and h-channels in the brain. Individual HCN isoforms have kinetic and modulatory properties which differ quantitatively. A comparison of their biophysical properties with those of native pacemaker channels provides insight into the molecular basis of the pacemaker current properties and, together with immunolabelling and other detection techniques, gives information on the pattern of HCN isoform distribution in different tissues. Because of their relevance to cardiac pacemaker activity, f-channels are a natural target of drugs aimed at the pharmacological control of heart rate. Several agents developed for their ability to selectively reduce heart rate act by a specific inhibition of f-channel function; these substances have a potential for the treatment of diseases such as angina and heart failure. In the near future, devices based on the delivery of f-channels in situ, or of a cellular source of f-channels (biological pacemakers), will likely be developed for use in therapies for diseases of heart rhythm with the aim of replacing electronic pacemakers.

Current medical management of chronic stable angina

Severe atherosclerotic narrowing of one or more coronary arteries is responsible for myocardial ischemia and angina pectoris in most patients with stable angina. The coronary arteries of patients with stable angina also contain many more non-obstructive plaques, which are prone to rupture resulting in acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina, myocardial infarction, sudden ischemic death). Therefore, the medical management must use strategies which not only relieve symptoms and prolong angina free walking but also reduce the incidence of adverse clinical outcomes. Whether any of the approved antianginal drugs, nitrates, beta-blockers, and calcium channel blockers reduce the incidence of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with stable angina has not been studied to date. Published data shows that percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures and coronary bypass surgery are effective in relieving angina but these procedures do not reduce mortality or the incidence of myocardial infarction compared to anti-anginal drug therapy. From the available data, an initial trial of medical treatment with anti-anginal drugs and strategies to reduce adverse clinical outcomes (smoking cessation, daily aspirin, treatment of dyslipidemias and hypertension) is indicated in most patients with stable angina pectoris. The initial choice of drug will depend on the presence or absence of comorbid conditions. Patients who do not respond to medical therapy or do not wish to take anti-anginal drugs and whose life style is limited because of anginal symptoms should be offered percutaneous revascularization procedures with or without stent placement or coronary bypass surgery. New drug-coated stents hold promise but long-term data and large-scale trials assessing the continued long-term improvement in symptoms and reduction of adverse outcomes is needed before offering such devices to all patients with stable angina. Newer medical therapies such as metabolic modulators and sinus rate lowering drugs also hold promise but need further evaluation. Patients who have refractory angina despite optimal medical therapy and are not candidates for revascularization procedures may be candidates for some new techniques of enhanced external Counterpulsation, Spinal Cord Stimulation, sympathectomy or direct transmyocardial revascularization. The usefulness of these techniques, however, needs to be confirmed in large randomized trials.

Voltage-dependent calcium channels and cardiac pacemaker activity: from ionic currents to genes

The spontaneous activity of pacemaker cells in the sino-atrial node controls the heart rhythm and rate under physiological conditions. Compared to working myocardial cells, pacemaker cells express a specific array of ionic channels. The functional importance of different ionic channels in the generation and regulation of cardiac automaticity is currently subject of an extensive research effort and has long been controversial. Among families of ionic channels, Ca(2+) channels have been proposed to substantially contribute to pacemaking. Indeed, Ca(2+) channels are robustly expressed in pacemaker cells, and influence the cell beating rate. Furthermore, they are regulated by the activity of the autonomic nervous system in both a positive and negative way. In this manuscript, we will first discuss how the concept of the involvement of Ca(2+) channels in cardiac pacemaking has been proposed and then subsequently developed by the recent advent in the domain of cardiac physiology of gene-targeting techniques. Secondly, we will indicate how the specific profile of Ca(2+) channels expression in pacemaker tissue can help design drugs which selectively regulate the heart rhythm in the absence of concomitant negative inotropism. Finally, we will indicate how the new possibility to assign a specific gene activity to a given ionic channel involved in cardiac pacemaking could implement the current postgenomic research effort in the construction of the cardiac Physiome.

[Selection and pharmacological characterisation of Procoralan, a selective inhibitor of the pacemaker If current]

The screening of a series of benzocycloalkane derivatives led to the selection of Procoralan (ivabradine), the first selective inhibitor of the depolarizing If (funny) current of the sinus node, for the treament of myocardial ischaemia. In vitro, this compound reduces the spontaneous beating rate of isolated right rat atria and the firing rate of the action potential of rabbit sinus node preparations. This effect is explained by a reduction in the diastolic depolarisation slope of the action potential and underlies a selective inhibition of the pacemaker If current. In vivo, it induces a selective reduction in heart rate both at rest and during exercise. It preserves myocardial contractility, atrioventricular conduction and ventricular repolarisation duration. Ivabradine exerts a similar anti-ischaemic activity in exercise-induced myocardial ischaemia in pigs to that of a beta-blocker and, furthermore, it limits to a greater extent ischaemic myocardial contractile dysfunction.

Development of cardiovascular drugs

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for assuring that drugs, devices, and biologicals available in the U.S. are effective and acceptably safe for their intended uses. Both law and regulation define the procedures to be followed by the FDA in judging the effectiveness and safety of therapies. The FDA comprises a cadre of highly skilled public servants who receive and evaluate all data collected by the manufacturer during therapy, not just the portion that reaches publication. To assist in reaching final conclusions about approvability, the FDA can empanel legally constituted advisory committees and external consultants when the need is perceived for additional specific scientific/technical expertise and substantial experience in clinical practice. Evidentiary standards for marketing approval of drugs, biologicals, and devices generally require direct demonstration of clinical benefit, rather than inferences drawn from "surrogate" pharmacologic/device-mediated effects, sufficient exposure to enable a reasonable assessment of countervailing risk, consideration of specific design elements in the pivotal clinical trials (including prespecified hypotheses [implicitly incorporated in "primary end points"], rigorous plans for statistical analyses, and so on), and assessment of persistence of effectiveness and associated stability of safety over time. Finally, sufficient information must be available so that practitioners can receive written instructions for use (the label) adequate to support the likelihood that recipients of the therapy will receive the expected benefits within the envelope of the stated risks. This article will discuss and expand on these issues, with examples.

Current and future treatment strategies for refractory angina

Patients with refractory angina are not candidates for revascularization and have both class III or IV angina and objective evidence of ischemia despite optimal medical therapy. An estimated 300,000 to 900,000 patients in the United States have refractory angina, and 25,000 to 75,000 new cases are diagnosed each year. This review focuses on treatment strategies for refractory angina and includes the mechanism of action and clinical trial data for each strategy. The pharmacological agents that have been used are ranolazine, ivabradine, nicorandil, L-arginine, testosterone, and estrogen; currently, only L-arginine, testosterone, and estrogen are approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Results with the noninvasive treatments of enhanced external counterpulsation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation are provided. Invasive treatment strategies including spinal cord stimulation, transmyocardial revascularization, percutaneous myocardial revascularization, and gene therapy are also reviewed.

Fréquence cardiaque et ischémie myocardique expérimentale

Every increase in heart rate represents a poor prognostic factor in cardiology, and multiple arguments have now led to the belief that reducing heart rate is a major therapeutic challenge. A comparison of the pharmacological effects of If current inhibitors such as zatebradine, and more recently ivabradine (Procoralan) and beta-blockers, have demonstrated experimentally that reductions in heart rate and myocardial contractile force contribute equally to the reduction in myocardial oxygen consumption in the normal heart. Conversely, at a similar level of reduction in heart rate, the lack of a concomitant negative inotropic effect with ivabradine affords longer diastolic perfusion times than beta-blockers. In other words, a negative inotropic effect is deleterious when an increase in coronary blood flow is required. Hence, if the anti-ischaemic effects afforded by an If current inhibitor and a beta-blocker are roughly comparable, the former are clearly of higher benefit than beta-blockers in the treatment of myocardial dysfunction accompanying cardiac ischaemia-reperfusion, especially myocardial stunning.

Heart Rate Reduction: A Potential Target for the Treatment of Myocardial Ischaemia

Because most of myocardial perfusion takes place during diastole, reducing the heart rate is likely to have anti-ischaemic effects. The present paper reviews the role of heart rate in relation to coronary artery disease outcome, as well as ways to reduce heart rate in the clinical setting. Nonpharmacological intervention, and particularly exercise training, has a definite effect on both heart rate reduction and the prevention of myocardial ischaemia. The protective role of beta-blockers after acute myocardial infarction is amply documented; their anti-ischaemic efficacy appears to be attributable to their effect on heart rate, but also to their role in cardiac inotropism. Recently, the If (funny) current inhibitor ivabradine, which has a potent heart rate reduction effect without any haemodynamic effect has demonstrated anti-ischaemic efficacy in a randomised trial versus placebo, as well as in trials where it showed an effect similar to that of the conventional anti-ischaemic agents amlodipine and atenolol. In addition, such an agent, which does not influence myocardial contractility, might be particularly valuable in the setting of myocardial stunning or acute left ventricular failure at the acute stage of myocardial infarction. However, only future studies will determine whether isolated heart rate reduction will have the same protective efficacy as that of beta-blocking agents in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction.

Pulse pressure, heart rate, and drug treatment of hypertension

Peak-systolic blood pressure (SBP) and end-diastolic blood pressure (DBP) have been considered the exclusive mechanical factors predicting cardiovascular (CV) risk in populations of normotensive and hypertensive subjects. The purpose of this review is to show that in addition to SBP and DBP, other hemodynamic indices that have particular relevance for coronary complications and originate from pulse pressure (PP) should be taken into account, namely brachial PP and, potentially, heart rate (HR). In normotensive and hypertensive populations, increased PP is an independent predictor for myocardial infarction, more powerful than SBP, even in hypertensive subjects under successful antihypertensive drug therapy. Increased HR is an additional CV risk factor, acting particularly through the presence of an enhanced PP x HR product. Such findings, observed during a period in which standard antihypertensive agents are known to reduce SBP and PP to a much lesser extent than DBP, require the development of intervention trials using drugs acting specifically on SBP, PP, and arterial stiffness.

I(f) channel inhibitor ivabradine lowers heart rate in mice with enhanced sympathoadrenergic activities

1. Ivabradine selectively reduces heart rate (HR) by inhibiting the cardiac pacemaker I(f) current, thus prolonging the duration of spontaneous depolarization in the sinus node. The activity of ivabradine under conditions of enhanced sympathoadrenergic activity has been addressed by investigating the effects of repeated oral administration in mice with sympathoadrenergic activation due to either stress, cardiac-restricted overexpression of beta(2)-adrenergic receptors (beta(2)AR), or beta-agonist administration. HR and left ventricular fractional shortening (FS) were determined by echocardiography. 2. Initial experiments showed that the conscious restrained state was associated with stress-mediated sympathetic activation, while sympathetic withdrawal occurred under anaesthetized conditions. In wild-type mice, ivabradine reduced HR under both conscious and anaesthetized states, with a similar degree in absolute reduction under both states. FS was unchanged by the treatment. 3. Ivabradine was similarly effective in reducing HR in the beta(2)AR transgenic mice. Further, ivabradine at 10 mg kg(-1) day(-1) reduced the maximal HR increase in response to the beta-agonist isoproterenol, without modifying the response of contractile parameters. 4. These data indicate that oral administration of ivabradine in mice reduces HR while ventricular performance is maintained. This specific HR-reducing action of ivabradine is well preserved under conditions that are associated with significant activation of the sympathoadrenergic system.

Heart Rate Lowering by Specific and Selective If Current Inhibition with Ivabradine

Resting heart rate is associated with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, and the mortality benefit of some cardiovascular drugs seems to be related in part to their heart rate-lowering effects. Since it is difficult to separate the benefit of heart rate lowering from other actions with currently available drugs, a 'pure' heart rate-lowering drug would be of great interest in establishing the benefit of heart rate reduction per se. Heart rate is determined by spontaneous electrical pacemaker activity in the sinoatrial node. Cardiac pacemaker cells generate the spontaneous slow diastolic depolarisation that drives the membrane voltage away from a hyperpolarised level towards the threshold level for initiating a subsequent action potential, generating rhythmic action potentials that propagate through the heart and trigger myocardial contraction. The I(f) current is an ionic current that determines the slope of the diastolic depolarisation, which in turn controls the heart beating rate. Ivabradine is the first specific heart rate-lowering agent to have completed clinical development for stable angina pectoris. Ivabradine specifically blocks cardiac pacemaker cell f-channels by entering and binding to a site in the channel pore from the intracellular side. Ivabradine is selective for the I(f) current and exerts significant inhibition of this current and heart rate reduction at concentrations that do not affect other cardiac ionic currents. This activity translates into specific heart rate reduction, which reduces myocardial oxygen demand and simultaneously improves oxygen supply, by prolonging diastole and thus allowing increased coronary flow and myocardial perfusion. Ivabradine lowers heart rate without any negative inotropic or lusitropic effect, thus preserving ventricular contractility. Ivabradine was shown to reduce resting heart rate without modifying any major electrophysiological parameters not related to heart rate. In patients with left ventricular dysfunction, ivabradine reduced resting heart rate without altering myocardial contractility. Thus, pure heart rate lowering can be achieved in the clinic as a result of specific and selective I(f) current inhibition. Two randomised clinical studies have shown that ivabradine is an effective anti-ischaemic agent that reduces heart rate and improves exercise capacity in patients with stable angina. Ivabradine was shown to be superior to placebo in improving exercise tolerance test (ETT) criteria (n = 360) and, in a 4-month, double-blind, controlled study (n = 939), ivabradine 5 and 7.5mg twice daily were shown to be at least as effective as atenolol 50 and 100mg once daily, respectively, in improving total exercise duration and other ETT criteria, and reducing the number of angina attacks. Experimental data indicate a potential role of pure heart rate lowering in other cardiovascular conditions, such as heart failure.

A Single Intravenous Dose of Ivabradine, a Novel If Inhibitor, Lowers Heart Rate but Does Not Depress Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

This randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated the effect of ivabradine, a novel heart rate-lowering agent, on echocardiographic indices of left ventricular (LV) systolic function in patients with regional (coronary artery disease) or global (cardiomyopathy) LV dysfunction. Patients were randomized on an unequal basis to receive ivabradine 0.25 mg/kg (n = 31) or placebo (n = 13) by intravenous infusion. Resting heart rate was reduced by a mean of 17.6 +/- 4.7% with ivabradine and 1.5 +/- 5.8% with placebo. The mean maximum decrease in LV ejection fraction was 0.2% with ivabradine and 1.7% with placebo. Fractional shortening and stroke volume were also fully preserved after ivabradine administration. Thus, a single intravenous dose of ivabradine produced a substantial reduction in resting heart rate without affecting LV function in patients with regional or global LV dysfunction.

Anti-Ischemic Effects of Ivabradine, a Selective Heart Rate-Reducing Agent, in Exercise-Induced Myocardial Ischemia in Pigs

The effects of ivabradine, a novel heart rate-reducing agent that inhibits the cardiac pacemaker current If, were compared with those of the beta-adrenergic blocker propranolol, in a model of exercise-induced regional myocardial ischemia in pigs. Five Yucatan micropigs were chronically instrumented to measure hemodynamics, regional myocardial contractility, and local electrograms, and a fixed stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery was induced using a clip. Each animal underwent three experiments on different days, each consisting of two treadmill exercise sessions, 4 hours apart. Ivabradine 5 mg/kg, propranolol 5 mg/kg, or vehicle was administered orally 3 hours before the second exercise session. Exercises before treatment and after vehicle produced reproducible hemodynamic changes and regional myocardial ischemia in the area perfused by the stenosed coronary artery, indicated by ST segment shift and regional contractile dysfunction. Ivabradine and propranolol were equipotent in reducing heart rate at rest and limiting tachycardia during exercise. Ivabradine, unlike propranolol, did not reduce left ventricular contractility at rest or during exercise, and did not increase atrio-ventricular conduction time. Both compounds reduced the exercise-induced ST segment shift in the ischemic region by approximately 80%, but ivabradine preserved systolic shortening to a significantly greater degree than propranolol (P < 0.05).