Combined chemoradiotherapy regimens of paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II locally advanced multi-modality protocol

Combined modality therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the U.S. among both men and women. Approximately 45% of patients present with stage III disease. A proportion of these patients is amenable to surgical resection; however, the majority are "unresectable." For patients with unresectable stage IIIA/B disease, thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) was considered the standard of care until the late 1980s despite a very poor 5-year survival rate. Several clinical trials demonstrated that the combination of chemotherapy and TRT was superior to TRT alone. Based on these data, combined modality therapy became the standard of care for patients with good performance status. Recent trials have shown that concurrent chemoradiotherapy offers a significant survival advantage over sequential chemoradiotherapy. Despite a substantial number of clinical trials, important questions on the optimal treatment paradigm remain. The most effective chemotherapy combination, the use of induction or consolidation chemotherapy in addition to the concurrent portion of therapy, and the optimal dose of chemotherapy with concurrent TRT have yet to be determined. The optimal total dose, fractionation, acceleration, treatment volume, and tumor targeting remain questions related to the TRT portion of therapy. Although significant progress has been made, the majority of patients experience locoregional or distant progression of their disease and die within 5 years of diagnosis. Thus, continued development and participation in clinical trials is crucial to further improvements in the treatment of patients with stage III disease.

Concurrent end-phase boost high-dose radiation therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with or without cisplatin chemotherapy

The aim of this study was to audit the results of a high-dose, combined-modality prospective protocol for non-small-cell lung cancer in terms of survival, disease-specific survival and toxicity. One hundred and twenty-one patients with non-small-cell lung cancer were treated with a concurrent, end-phase, boost, high-dose radiotherapy protocol with 65 Gy in 35 fractions for more than 5 weeks. Sixty-six patients received radiotherapy alone (group 1), 29 received concurrent chemoradiation (group 2) and 26 received neoadjuvant and concurrent chemotherapy (group 3). Thirty-four patients had stage I disease, six had stage II and 81 had stage III. Overall median survival was 23 months: 75% at 1 year and 23% at 5 years. Median survivals for patients with stage I and stages II and III disease were 43 and 19 months, respectively. For stages II and III patients by groups 1-3, median survivals were 18, 25 and 18 months, respectively, and 2-year survivals were 36, 52 and 38%, respectively. Toxicity was acceptable. Overall, 9% had symptomatic pneumonitis and 7% had grades 3 and 4 oesophagitis. For those who had the mediastinum included in the volume, grade > or = 3 oesophagitis occurred in 0, 11 and 22% (n = 110, P = 0.001), respectively, for treatment groups 1-3. Overall treatment-related mortality was 3%, consisting of two septic deaths, one pneumonitis and possibly one late cardiac event, all occurring in patients who had chemotherapy (7% of 55 patients). Treatment-related mortality declined over the study period. Accelerated radiotherapy was well tolerated, with only moderate increased acute toxicity when combined with concurrent platinum chemotherapy. Toxicity was enhanced by induction chemotherapy. Overall survival outcomes were excellent for this condition. Continued use of this radiotherapy schedule is recommended as the platform for assessment of other chemotherapy schedules.

[Treatment of localised lung cancer]

This paper focuses on stage I, II and IIIA non-small cell lung cancer treatable with local treatment. It addresses five questions raised by strategies combining local treatments with chemotherapy. Even if chemotherapy increases resectability of stage III disease, the chemotherapy-surgery combination has not been demonstrated to increase survival compared to the standard chemo-radiation treatment. The results of the study by Van Meerbeeck do not support this hypothesis. Does surgery, added to chemo-radiotherapy, improve the outcome in stage IIIAN2 disease? This was the question addressed by the study by K. Albain. There is probably not clear cut answer. However, the trimodality strategy might be interesting in patients undergoing a lobectomy and might have a negative impact when a pneumonectomy has been performed. In patients with a non resectable/inoperable cancer treated with standard chemoradiation, the concomitant strategy has been shown to be superior to sequential treatment. However, due to acute toxicity, it should be delivered to selected patients, who still need to be better defined. The chemotherapy-surgery combination is becoming standard (in stage II disease) and most cooperative groups will probably stand in favour of it in 2006. The best respective timing for chemotherapy and surgery is still debated. There are many advantages in favour of preoperative chemotherapy, including better feasibility and the higher proportion of patients who can benefit. However, there is no statistically reliable demonstration of such superiority.

Induction cisplatin-gemcitabine-paclitaxel plus concurrent radiotherapy and gemcitabine in the multimodality treatment of unresectable stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate feasibility and safety of induction three-drugs combination chemotherapy and concurrent radio-chemotherapy in stage IIIB NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage IIIB NSCLC were treated with three courses of induction chemotherapy, cisplatin 50 mg/m(2), paclitaxel 125 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1,8 of every 21 day cycle. Patients without distant progressive disease were then treated with radiotherapy and concurrent weekly gemcitabine (250 mg/m(2)). Toxicity and response of radio-chemotherapy treatment have been assessed.

RESULTS

Between Jan 01 and Nov 02, 46 patients were enrolled. Grade 3+ hematological and non-hematological toxicity during the induction phase were 41.3% and 13.1%, respectively. In 38 patients a Clinical Response or Stable Disease was recorded and these patients underwent to concurrent radio-chemotherapy. Grade 3+ hematological and non-hematological toxicities were 8.2% in this group. Further response was observed in 66% of patients. Overall median survival time was 17.8 months, with a 3-year survival rates of 23%.

CONCLUSION

Three-drugs induction chemotherapy and concurrent radio-chemotherapy with weekly gemcitabine in locally advanced stage IIIB NSCLC is feasible and safe.

Simultaneous Chemoradiotherapy Compared With Radiotherapy Alone After Induction Chemotherapy in Inoperable Stage IIIA or IIIB Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Study CTRT99/97 by the Bronchial Carcinoma Therapy Group

Purpose

The aim of this study was to examine whether, after preceding induction chemotherapy, simultaneous chemoradiotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone.

Patients and Methods

Patients with non–small-cell lung cancer in inoperable stage IIIA or IIIB received induction chemotherapy with two cycles of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the curve 6 every 3 weeks. Patients without progression at restaging after induction chemotherapy were randomly assigned to radiotherapy (60 Gy) or chemoradiotherapy (paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 weekly). The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points were time to progression, response, and toxicity.

Results

Three hundred three patients entered the study, and 276 completed induction chemotherapy. Two hundred fourteen patients were randomly assigned (radiotherapy alone: n = 113; simultaneous chemoradiotherapy: n = 101). Median follow-up time of all randomly assigned patients was 13.6 months (interquartile range [IQR], 6.4 to 29.0 months), and median follow-up time of the subgroup of censored patients (n = 52) was 37.4 months (IQR, 5.9 to 57.0 months; maximum, 76.1 months). Toxicities during the induction phase were mild. During radiotherapy, overall toxicity rates were not significantly different between the two arms. Median survival times in the radiotherapy group and chemoradiotherapy group were 14.1 months (95% CI, 11.8 to 16.3 months) and 18.7 months (95% CI, 14.1 to 23.3 months; difference not statistically significant, P = .091). Median time to progression significantly favored simultaneous chemoradiotherapy (11.5 months; 95% CI, 8.3 to 14.7 months) versus radiotherapy alone (6.3 months; 95% CI, 5.0 to 7.6 months; P < .001, log-rank test).

Conclusion

Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy with weekly paclitaxel is feasible. Response, time to progression, and survival favor chemoradiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone.

Is trimodality approach better then bimodality in stage IIIA, N2 positive non-small cell lung cancer?

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery is currently being investigated for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study reports efficacy, toxicity and feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy (CCRT) in stage IIIA, N2 positive NSCLC.

METHODS

From March 2001 to February 2004, 52 patients with histologically confirmed stage IIIA, N2 positive NSCLC were registered. Patients received preoperative CCRT that consisted of weekly paclitaxel plus platinum chemotherapy and concurrent radiotherapy followed by surgery.

RESULTS

Overall response rate was 76.9% (95% CI, 64-88%). The major grade 3-4 toxicities were radiation esophagitis (15.4%) and neutropenia (11.5%), and treatment-related mortality rate was 1.9%. Forty-two of 52 patients (80.8%) subsequently underwent surgical resection and 35 of 52 patients (67.3%) underwent complete resection. Among them, pathological complete response was obtained in 4.8%. Pathological downstaging rate to N0-1 and stage 0-II at surgery were 69.0% and 66.7%, respectively. The perioperative major morbidity rate was 23.8% and perioperative mortality was 2.4%. At a median follow-up of 33.9 months (range: 16.4-49.9), the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 16.5 months (95% CI, 6.2-26.8) and 25.6 months (95% CI, 14.6-36.6), respectively. Multivariate analyses identified that patients achieved mediastinal nodal clearance (downstage to pathological N0 or N1) after CCRT (p=0.02) and age at diagnosis<60 years (p=0.01) showed significantly improved survival.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant CCRT showed a high overall response rate with tolerable toxicity profile. Downstaging after CCRT may increase the rate of complete tumor resection and result in survival benefit in stage IIIA, N2 positive NSCLC patients.

Phase II Trial of Sequential Chemotherapy Followed by Chemoradiation, Surgery, and Postoperative Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Stage IIIA/IIIB Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer remains a challenge. Although the benefit of combined chemoradiation has been established, the optimal chemotherapy regimen, timing of full-dose chemotherapy, and how best to combine chemotherapy with radiation to maximize systemic and radiosensitizing effects remain unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with pathologically confirmed stage IIIA/IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer were included in a phase II trial of sequential carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by chemoradiation, surgery, and postoperative gemcitabine. Twenty-five patients (86%) completed the concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy phase and were eligible for surgery. At restaging, 7 patients (21%) showed disease progression. Seventeen patients (59%) went on to surgery. Few were able to tolerate full postoperative chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The 1-year overall survival rate was 61%, with a 2-year survival rate of 56%. Median overall survival was 25.2 months. Seven of the patients are alive and without recurrence at the time of this writing. Our median follow-up time was 22.2 months. Reversible grade 3/4 toxicities were fairly common, experienced in 45% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Our results with this combined modality approach are comparable with those of previous, similar studies. Postoperative chemotherapy after initial combined modality therapy is often not feasible, reinforcing the value of initial systemic therapy. Long-term results are still suboptimal and await studies adding targeted therapies to our usual chemotherapy/radiation approaches.

High-dose radiation employing external beam radiotherapy and high-dose rate brachytherapy with and without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation for prostate cancer patients with intermediate- and high-risk features

The role of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (NAD) in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving high-dose radiotherapy (RT) remains unstudied. To evaluate the effect of a course of NAD, we reviewed the experiences of three institutions treating these patients with combined RT and high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR). Of 1260 prostate cancer patients with high-risk features (pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > or =10, Gleason Score (GS) > or =7, or T stage > or =T2b), 560 received no NAD (n=308) or NAD for < or =6 months (n=252). Median dose to the prostate from RT and HDR was 42 and 23 Gy, respectively. Average total biologic equivalent prostate dose was >100 Gy (alpha/beta=1.2). Median follow-up was 4.3 years. Pretreatment characteristics were similar on chi(2) tables for all 560 patients treated with or without NAD including pretreatment PSA (P=0.11), GS (P=0.4), and clinical T stage (P=0.2). Outcomes worsened for patients receiving NAD (5-year distant metastasis (DM) 10 vs 5% (P=0.04); cause-specific survival (CSS), 93 vs 98% (P=0.005)). Higher 5-year DM rates and lower CSS occurred in NAD patients with a GS between 8 and 10 (n=112 (P=0.03, P=0.02)), pretreatment PSA> or =15 (n=136 (P=0.03, P=0.008)), and palpable disease > or =T2a (n=434 (P=0.04, P=0.02)). The only two significant risk factors for DM on Cox multivariate analysis were GS (P=0.003, HR 2.8) and NAD (P=0.03, HR 2.7). AD given before definitive high-dose RT did not benefit prostate cancer patients with intermediate- and high-risk features. We favor the use of concurrent/adjuvant AD over prolonged NAD for prostate cancer patients for whom AD is clinically indicated.

Chemoradiation paradigm for the treatment of lung cancer

For the treatment of locoregional advanced stage III non-small-cell lung cancer, when chemotherapy is added sequentially to radiotherapy it acts systemically and is aimed at reducing distant metastases. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation, however, is intended to enhance the locoregional efficacy of this modality. Combined effects of these modalities are based on their different toxicity profiles, leading to a reduced toxicity : efficacy ratio of the combination. Controlled trials investigating this additive approach indicate that concurrent application of chemotherapy and radiotherapy results in a small but significant benefit for locoregional control, which translates into a small but measurable survival benefit. This benefit is most evident when looking at 3-year or 5-year overall survival rates, when it is of clinical significance. The use of single-agent cisplatin has already demonstrated major radiosensitizing effects whereas the radiosensitizing properties of concurrent application of the single-agent carboplatin have not been observed in controlled trials. Newer drugs such as vinorelbine, the taxanes and gemcitabine might enhance this effect, although no improvement has been observed in randomized controlled trials comparing such regimens with single-agent cisplatin. New 'targeted' agents might synergize with ionizing irradiation and provide an interesting rationale concerning combined modality therapy, but this hypothesis awaits prospective clinical evidence from randomized controlled trials.

The Role of Radiation Therapy in Thoracic Tumors

Radiation plays an important role in the treatment of thoracic tumors. During the last 10 years there have been several major advances in thoracic RT including the incorporation of concurrent chemotherapy and the application of con-formal radiation-delivery techniques (eg, stereotactic RT, three-dimensional conformal RT, and intensity-modulated RT) that allow radiation dose escalation. Radiation as a local measure remains the definitive treatment of medically inoperable or surgically unresectable disease in NSCLC and part of a multimodality regimen for locally advanced NSCLC, limited stage SCLC, esophageal cancer, thymoma, and mesothelioma.

Post-chemotherapy gross tumor volume is predictive of survival in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with combined modality therapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of clinical covariates, particularly pre-chemotherapy gross tumor volume (GTV), post-chemotherapy GTV, on overall survival in the treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed 102 patients who were enrolled on three consecutive clinical trials, which employed the treatment paradigm of two cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by thoracic radiation therapy. The pre-chemotherapy GTV, post-chemotherapy GTV, change in GTV, histology, disease stage, performance status, age, race, treatment with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone were evaluated to determine their impact on overall survival. The log10 of the GTV was used to normalize the data and thereby reduce the impact of exceptionally large values.

RESULTS

Both the log10 of the post-chemotherapy GTV and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status covariates were highly prognostic for overall survival (p = 0.006 and p = 0.008, respectively). Disease stage (at diagnosis) was also significant (p = 0.048). The log10 pre-chemotherapy GTV covariate was borderline significant (p = 0.067). The strongest prognostic model was the two-covariate model, which contained the log10 post-chemotherapy GTV and ECOG performance status covariates, (model chi2 of 18.67, with p = 0.001 for each covariate).

CONCLUSIONS

The log10 post-chemotherapy GTV has significant prognostic survival value when the strategy of induction chemotherapy is employed in the treatment on stage III NSCLC. ECOG performance status and stage were also significant prognostic factors for survival.

Phase I/II trial of biweekly docetaxel and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiation for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We conducted phase I and II studies of biweekly docetaxel and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy, followed by consolidation chemotherapy with the same drugs in patients with locally advanced, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our objectives were to define the maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the phase I study, and to determine the response rate, toxicity, and survival rate at the recommended dose (RD) in the phase II study.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC were studied. Six to eight cycles of docetaxel and cisplatin were administered at 2-week intervals. In the phase I study, patients received four dose levels: level 1, docetaxel/cisplatin=30/40 mg/m2; level 2, 35/40; level 3, 40/40; and level 4, 45/40. Radiotherapy was delivered at a rate of 2 Gy per fraction/day up to a total dose of 60 Gy over the course of 6 weeks, during the first three cycles of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

DLT comprised neutropenia at level 4 in the phase I study (n=15), and level 3 was considered the RD. In the phase II study (n=46), two patients had a complete response (4.3%) and 34 had a partial response (73.9%), for an overall response rate of 78.2% [95% CI (66.3-90.2%)]. The survival rate was 69.1% at 1 year and 39.6% at 2 years, with a median survival time of 19.1 months. Leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and radiation esophagitis were the most common toxic reactions, with Grade > or = 3 reactions occurring at rates of 77, 70, 17, and 8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Biweekly docetaxel and cisplatin with concurrent RT was active and well tolerated in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer

Chemoradiotherapy is a standard treatment for both unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer and limited-stage small cell lung cancer. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy yields a 5-year survival rate of approximately 15% for patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The state-of-the-art treatment for limited-stage small cell lung cancer is four cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin plus etoposide combined with early concurrent twice-daily thoracic irradiation and prophylactic cranial irradiation after complete remission. A 5-year survival rate of approximately 25% is expected among patients treated for limited-stage small cell lung cancer. The incorporation of new agents, including target-based drugs, is one of the most promising strategies for improving the survival of patients.