Complications associated with pedicle screws

Accuracy analysis of pedicle screw placement in posterior scoliosis surgery: comparison between conventional fluoroscopic and computer-assisted technique

STUDY DESIGN

The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was evaluated in posterior scoliosis surgeries with or without the use of computer-assisted surgical techniques.

OBJECTIVE

In this retrospective cohort study, the pedicle screw placement accuracy in posterior scoliosis surgery was compared between conventional fluoroscopic and computer-assisted surgical techniques.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There has been no study systemically analyzing the perforation pattern and comparative accuracy of pedicle screw placement in posterior scoliosis surgery.

METHODS

The 45 patients who received posterior correction surgeries were divided into 2 groups: Group C, manual control (25 patients); and Group N, navigation surgery (20 patients). The average Cobb angles were 73.7 degrees and 73.1 degrees before surgery in Group C and Group N, respectively. Using CT images, vertebral rotation, pedicle axes as measured to anteroposterior sacral axis and vertebral axis, and insertion angle error were measured. In perforation cases, the angular tendency, insertion point, and length abnormality were evaluated.

RESULTS

The perforation was observed in 11% of Group C and 1.8% in Group N. In Group C, medial perforations of left screws were demonstrated in 8 of 9 perforated screws and 55% were distributed either in L1 or T12. The perforation consistently occurred in pedicles in which those axes approached anteroposterior sacral axis within 5 degrees . The average insertion errors were 8.4 degrees and 5.0 degrees in Group C and Group N, respectively, which were significantly different (P < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The medial perforation in Group C occurred around L1, especially when pedicle axis approached anteroposterior sacral axis. This consistent tendency was considered as the limitation of fluoroscopic screw insertion in which horizontal vertebral image was not visible. The use of surgical navigation system successfully reduced the perforation rate and insertion angle errors, demonstrating the clear advantage in safe and accurate pedicle screw placement of scoliosis surgery.

Pediatric nonaccidental trauma thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation: posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screw fixation in an 8-month-old boy

STUDY DESIGN

Case report of pedicle screw fixation in an infant with nonaccidental spine trauma.

OBJECTIVE

To ensure awareness of nonaccidental pediatric spine trauma and describe a safe and effective method of treating a complex problem of thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation in an infant.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Nonaccidental pediatric spine trauma is rare, accounting for <1% of abuse. No previous cases of pedicle screw fixation have been described in a patient younger than 1 year of age. Prior treatment of this clinical entity has been treated with casts or wire-fixation.

METHODS

An 8-month-old boy had a nonaccidental (also known as child abuse) traumatic T12-L1 fracture-dislocation. This was subsequently surgically corrected with posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation with pedicle screws.

RESULTS

After surgery, the patient is doing well with no adverse effects from surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Although child abuse is a rare cause of spinal trauma, clinicians should do a full skeletal survey to ensure no other injuries are overlooked. Pedicle screw fixation can be used in infants with unstable traumatic spinal injuries, allowing earlier rehabilitation and return to normal activity level.

Diathermy testing: a novel method with electric knife stimulation to avoid nerve injuries during lumbar pedicle screw placement

✓ The purpose of this retrospective study was to demonstrate the utility of diathermy in avoiding nerve injuries due to misplacement of lumbar pedicle screws (PSs).

The authors used diathermy to assess whether a screw deviated from the pedicle by observing synchronous leg movements caused by intermittently touching an electric knife to the pedicular instrument. Diathermy was performed in 259 cases in which 1301 PSs had been placed. Leg movements were observed in 36 cases, and the sensitivity of diathermy was 85.7%, with a specificity of 99.5%. No neurological complications associated with the placement of PSs were observed after adding diathermy testing to conventional methods.

Diathermy testing may be a way to avoid nerve injuries during lumbar PS placement.

Complications of Spinal Instrumentation

Despite tremendous technical advances in spine surgery in recent decades, patients may experience residual or recurrent pain and other symptoms after such surgery. The standard history and physical examination have only limited utility for assessing the postoperative anatomy, and radiologists can play an important role in diagnosing complications and guiding postoperative care. To do so effectively, they must be familiar with the imaging features of successful and unsuccessful fusion, instrumentation fracture and loosening, complications due to faulty hardware placement, and postoperative infection. A basic knowledge of spinal biomechanics and common approaches to surgical instrumentation also may help radiologists anticipate and identify complications.

Long-term actuarial survivorship analysis of an interspinous stabilization system

In 1986, an interspinous dynamic stabilization system (the prototype of the current Wallis implant) was designed to stiffen unstable operated degenerate lumbar segments with a hard interspinous blocker to limit extension and a tension band around the spinous processes to secure the implant and limit flexion. Restoring physiological mechanical conditions to the treated level(s) while preserving some intervertebral mobility was intended to treat low-back pain related to degenerative instability without increasing stress forces in the adjacent segments. The procedure was easily reversible. If low back pain persisted or recurred, the device was removed and stability was achieved using fusion. The intermediate-term results were promising, but the long-term safety and efficacy of this dynamic interspinous stabilization device has not been previously documented. We retrospectively reviewed the hospital files of all the patients (n = 241) who had this dynamic stabilization system implanted between 1987 and 1995, contacting as many as possible to determine the actuarial survivorship of the system. In this manner, 142 of the 241 patients (58.9%) were contacted by telephone. The endpoints used for the survivorship analysis were 'any subsequent lumbar operation' and 'implant removal'. At 14 years follow-up, values of actuarial survivorship with 95% confidence interval were 75.9 +/- 8.3 and 81.3 +/- 6.8% for the endpoints 'any subsequent lumbar operation' and 'implant removal', respectively. There was no difference in survivorship of multiple-level implants with respect to single-level devices. Although the conclusions of the present study must be tempered by the 41% attrition rate, these findings support the long-term safety of this system, and possibly long-term protective action against adjacent-level degeneration by motion preservation. Outcomes at least equivalent to those of fusion were observed without the primary drawbacks of fusion.

Automatic determination of pedicle screw size, length, and trajectory from patient data

Pedicle screw insertion is an orthopaedic spinal fixation procedure involving the placement of screws through individual spine pedicles and secured in spinal vertebrae. Pedicle anatomy varies widely within and across the patient population, and many complications have been reported with the surgical technique. To reduce complications, an automated procedure was developed that utilizes patient-specific medical imaging data to predetermine optimum pedicle screw size, length, and trajectory. The procedure involves importing medical imaging scans into the software, creating uniform voxel data for algorithm simplicity, segmenting the bony anatomy of the spine and defining its boundary, and identifying the pedicle using a search algorithm. The operations are performed in two-dimensions in the coordinate system of the medical imaging data. For each image slice, the minimum pedicle width is identified, and examining all slices identifies the overall minimum pedicle width. The optimum trajectory is determined using a 3D linear least squares fit to the array of minimum pedicle width midpoints. With the optimum trajectory determined, the maximum screw size and length are determined.

Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN

A meta-analysis of the published literature was conducted specifically looking at accuracy and the postoperative methods used for the assessment of pedicle screw placement in the human spine.

OBJECTIVES

This study specifically aimed to identify postoperative methods used for pedicle screw placement assessment, including the most common method, and to report cumulative pedicle screw placement study statistics from synthesis of the published literature.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Safety concerns have driven specific interests in the accuracy and precision of pedicle screw placement. A large variation in reported accuracy may exist partly due to the lack of a standardized evaluation method and/or the lack of consensus to what, or in which range, is pedicle screw placement accuracy considered satisfactory.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was executed covering the span from 1966 until 2006, and references from identified papers were reviewed. An extensive database was constructed for synthesis of the identified studies. Subgroups and descriptive statistics were determined based on the type of population, in vivo or cadaveric, and separated based on whether the assistance of navigation was employed.

RESULTS

In total, we report on 130 studies resulting in 37,337 total pedicle screws implanted, of which 34,107 (91.3%) were identified as accurately placed for the combined in vivo and cadaveric populations. The most common assessment method identified pedicle screw violations simply as either present or absent. Overall, the median placement accuracy for the in vivo assisted navigation subgroup (95.2%) was higher than that of the subgroup without the use of navigation (90.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Navigation does indeed provide a higher accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws for most of the subgroups presented. However, an exception is found at the thoracic levels for both the in vivo and cadaveric populations, where no advantage in the use of navigation was found.

Fluoroscopic computer-assisted pedicle screw placement through a mature fusion mass: an assessment of 24 consecutive cases with independent analysis of computed tomography and clinical data

STUDY DESIGN

Observational matched cohort study with computed tomography (CT) analysis of pedicle screw placement.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the clinical accuracy of computer-assisted fluoroscopy for the placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws through a mature posterolateral fusion mass.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pedicle screw placement through an amorphous posterolateral fusion mass intuitively carries a higher risk of pedicle wall violation.

METHODS

Postoperative CT scans of 102 pedicle screws placed through a mature posterolateral fusion mass (n = 10 [T10-T12]; n = 92 [L1-S1]) were independently assessed and compared with a matched control (nonobscured anatomy) group. All screws were placed before any decompression using the FluoroNav system.

RESULTS

In the fusion mass group, overall 81.4% of screws were completely within the pedicle. Seven medial and 12 lateral pedicle breaches occurred. Relative to the total number of screws, pedicle breaches were graded II (<2 mm) in 13.5%, III (2-4 mm) in 2.9%, and IV (>4 mm) in 2.0% of screws. The number and direction of pedicle breaches were not significantly different when compared with the control group. There were no clinically significant screw misplacements in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of computer-assisted fluoroscopy is safe and effective for the placement of thoracolumbar (T10-S1) pedicle screws through a posterolateral fusion mass without performing laminoforaminotomies.

Mechanical performance of cylindrical and dual core pedicle screws in calf and human vertebrae

INTRODUCTION

Failure of pedicle screws by loosening and back out remains a significant clinical problem. Pedicle screw fixation is determined by bone mineral density, pedicle morphology and screw design. The objective of this study was to compare the holding strength of newly developed dual core pedicle screws having a cylindrical design in terms of outer diameter and two cylindrical inner core regions connected by a conical transition with conventional cylindrical pedicle screws.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty bovine lumbar vertebrae and 40 human lumbar vertebrae were used. Five different screws were tested in nine experimental "settings" and ten specimens each. The screws were tested for cranial displacement and pullout strength before and after 5,000 cycles of cranio-caudal loading. The tests included a setting with fully inserted and 4 mm backed out screws. For statistical analysis the incomplete balanced block design was used.

RESULTS

Cyclic loading led to a decrease of pullout force between 24 and 31% and a 9% increase of displacement. The cylindrical screw designs were affected more than the dual core designs. The pullout force of cylindrical screws was smaller than of dual core screws. Even in a backed out condition dual core screws showed a significantly smaller displacement than cylindrical screws.

CONCLUSION

Pedicle screws with the dual core design provide good anchorage in the vertebra.

Stepwise Methodology for Plain Radiographic Assessment of Pedicle Screw Placement: A Comparison With Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a specific methodology for plain radiographic assessment of lumbar pedicle screw position.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of using orthogonal plain radiographs and a systematic method of interpretation, developed by the senior author, in assessing the placement of lumbar and lumbosacral pedicle screws.

STUDY DESIGN

This was an adult cadaver study of the accuracy of using plain radiographs or computed tomography to assess pedicle screw position. Plain radiographs were performed and compared with computed tomography (CT) scans. Gross anatomic dissections were performed to directly confirm screw position. Variables, including screw material, radiographic view, and screw dimensions, were assessed for their effect on the ability of physicians to determine pedicle screw position. Multiple readers were included in the study, including 1 spine Fellow, 3 experienced orthopedic spine surgeons, and 1 neuroradiologist.

METHODS

Five adult cadaveric spines were instrumented with titanium pedicle screws from L1 to S1. Screws were placed outside the confines of the pedicle in all 4 quadrants or within the pedicle using a Latin-Square design. Each cadaver was imaged with orthogonal radiographs and high-resolution CT scans. The spines were then reimaged after the instrumentation was replaced with stainless steel screws placed in the identical position. Finally, each spine was dissected to assess the exact position of the screws. Images were read in a blinded fashion by 1 spine fellow, 2 staff surgeons, and a staff radiologist. The results were compared with the known screw positions at dissection.

RESULTS

In total, 120 pedicle screws were placed, 44 (38%) outside the confines of the pedicle. Sensitivity, defined as the percent of the misplaced screws that were correctly identified, was similar across the 3 diagnostic tests, but markedly improved when all CT formats were considered together. Similarly, specificity, defined as the percent of screws correctly read as being placed within the pedicle, was independent of radiographic examination. Sensitivity of the radiographic technique was 70.1% and specificity was 83.0%, whereas sensitivity for CT scans was 84.7% and specificity was 89.7%. There was an observed association with anatomic level, with a consistently less accuracy in detecting screw position at L1 with plain x-ray (P=0.001). Additionally, correct position of stainless steel screws was more difficult to detect as compared with titanium (P=0.033) using either x-rays or CT. Other variables examined, such as screw length and screw diameter, did not have an effect on the ability to read the positioning.

CONCLUSIONS

CT scans, often considered the "gold standard" for clinical assessment of pedicle screw placement, have limitations when validated with gross anatomical dissection. The described systematic method for evaluating pedicle screw placement using orthogonal plain radiographs attained accuracy comparable to high-resolution CT scans.

Inserting pedicle screws in the upper thoracic spine without the use of fluoroscopy or image guidance. Is it safe?

Several studies have looked at accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement using fluoroscopy, image guidance, and anatomical landmarks. To our knowledge the upper thoracic spine (T1-T6) has not been specifically studied in the context of screw insertion and placement accuracy without the use of either image guidance or fluoroscopy. Our objective was to study the accuracy of upper thoracic screw placement without the use of fluoroscopy or image guidance, and report on implant related complications. A single surgeon inserted 60 screws in 13 consecutive non-scoliotic spine patients. These were the first 60 screws placed in the high thoracic spine in our institution. The most common diagnosis in our patient population was trauma. All screws were inserted using a modified Roy-Camille technique. Post-operative axial computed tomography (CT) images were obtained for each patient and analyzed by an independent senior radiologist for placement accuracy. Implant related complications were prospectively noted. No pedicle screw misplacement was found in 61.5% of the patients. In the remaining 38.5% of patients some misplacements were noted. Fifty-three screws out of the total 60 implanted were placed correctly within all the pedicle margins. The overall pedicle screw placement accuracy was 88.3% using our modified Roy-Camille technique. Five medial and two lateral violations were noted in the seven misplaced screws. One of the seven misplaced screws was considered to be questionable in terms of pedicle perforation. No implant related complications were noted. We found that inserting pedicle screws in the upper thoracic spine based solely on anatomical landmarks was safe with an accuracy comparable to that of published studies using image-guided navigation at the thoracic level.

Computed tomography evaluation of superior-segment facet-joint violation after pedicle instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a midline surgical approach

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the frequency of pedicle screw violation of superior nonfused facet joints adjacent to the most cephalad pedicle screws after a midline approach for lumbar fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Facet-joint violations have been evaluated in patients undergoing lumbar pedicle screw instrumentation and fusion with a Wiltse muscle-splitting approach, but not via the more common midline approach.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2003, 204 patients underwent this procedure. Computed tomography scans (within 1 year postsurgery) were evaluated independently for superior facet-joint violation. chi tests were used to examine bivariate associations of superior level facet-joint violation, patient age, construct level, diagnosis, and revision status for significance (P < or = 0.05).

RESULTS

Superior-level facet-joint violation occurred in 24% of patients and 15% of screws, twice as often on the left side (P = 0.0396) than on the right, more frequently in single than in multiple-level procedures (P < 0.0001), and most frequently with the most cephalad screws at L5 (48%). We found no significant associations between violation rates and other designated parameters.

CONCLUSION

The left side, single-level fusion, and most cephalad pedicle screws at L5 are targets for interventions to reduce pedicle violations in this procedure.

The effect of pedicle expansion on pedicle morphology and biomechanical stability in the immature porcine spine

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical study in an animal model.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of sequential dilation of the immature pedicles by dilators and to determine the biomechanical stability of screws placed in these expanded pedicles.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pedicle screws have become the implant of choice in spinal fixation. Secondary to the small vertebra sizes of pediatric patients and difficulty in finding appropriate screw sizes, they have found limited use in pediatric spine. Dilation of the pediatric pedicles may overcome the limitation secondary to discrepancy between screw sizes. However, there are no data in the literature regarding dilation capacity of pediatric pedicles to enable larger pedicle screw fixation.

METHODS

Two-month-old domestic pig vertebrae were used. The right pedicles were dilated with stainless steel dilators just before there is visual evidence of pedicle failure. The left pedicles served as a control group. The inner and outer diameters of the pedicles were measured on the CT scans before and after dilation. The pedicles were instrumented with 3.5-mm pedicle screws at the thoracic level and 4.0-mm pedicle screws at the lumbar level. The pullout strength of each pedicle was measured.

RESULTS

The dilation procedure resulted in an increase in both inner (2.59 +/- 0.75 to 3.32 +/- 0.58 mm) and outer diameters (5.43 +/- 0.95 to 6.21 +/- 0.96 mm) (P < 0.05). The inner diameters dilated more than the outer diameters (34.3% vs. 15.0%). The pullout strength of the expanded pedicles (320.1 +/- 83.9 N) was significantly lower than the nonexpanded ones (408.1 +/- 102.0 N) (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that immature pedicles can be expanded by application of serial dilators. However, dilation significantly decreases the pullout strength of the pedicle.

Bone-mounted miniature robotic guidance for pedicle screw and translaminar facet screw placement: Part I--Technical development and a test case result

OBJECTIVE

To introduce a new miniature robot (SpineAssist; MAZOR Surgical Technologies, Caesarea, Israel) that has been developed and tested as a surgical assistant for accurate percutaneous placement of pedicle screws and translaminar facet screws.

METHODS

Virtual projections in three planes-axial, lateral, and anteroposterior-are reconstructed for each vertebra from a preoperative computed tomographic (CT) scan. On a specially designed graphic user interface with proprietary software, the surgeon plans the trajectory of the screws. Intraoperative fluoroscopic x-rays with targeting devices are then matched with the CT-based virtual images, as well as the surgeon's plan. A clamp is attached to the spinous process or a minimally invasive frame (Hover-T frame; MAZOR Surgical Technologies) is mounted to the iliac crest and one spinous process. The miniature robot is then attached to the clamp and/or frame. On the basis of combined CT scan and fluoroscopic data, the robot aligns itself to the desired entry point and trajectory, as dictated by the surgeon's preoperative plan.

RESULTS

A test case in a cadaver lumbar spine was performed in which four screws and two rods were inserted, using a minimally invasive technique, combining the SpineAssist system and Hover-T frame in conjunction with the PathFinder system (Spinal Concept Inc., Austin, TX). The discrepancy between the planned and actual screw trajectories was measured by means of postprocedural CT scan. Overall, the four screws were implanted with an average deviation of 1.02 +/- 0.56 mm (range, 0-1.5 mm) from the surgeon's plan.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results confirm the system's accuracy and support its use in minimally invasive spine surgery applications.

Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement for Upper and Middle Thoracic Pathologies Without Coronal Plane Spinal Deformity Using Conventional Methods

There is a growing interest in the implantation of pedicle screws into the middle and upper thoracic spine. However, usage of the technique is still under debate for these levels because the pedicles in these regions are small and exhibit a high degree of inter- and intraspecimen variability. Twenty-four consecutive patients treated for upper and middle thoracic pathologies by pedicle screw instrumentation under biplanar or uniplanar fluoroscopy were evaluated retrospectively. The rate of screw misplacement on postoperative computerized tomography and complications caused by misplaced screws were determined. In 24 cases, a total of 113 upper-middle thoracic pedicle screws were inserted. Fifty-one of them were inserted between T2 and T5 with guidance of biplanar fluoroscopy, and 62 were inserted between T6 and T8 with uniplanar fluoroscopy. The rate of misplacement was 20.3% for 113 screws (27.4% for T2 to T5 screws, and 14.5% for 62 T6 to T8 screws). Four screws were incorrectly inserted which could have clinical significance (3.5%), and 1 of them required revision. The difference between the upper and middle thoracic screws was not statistically significant (P=0.089). Screw insertion with laminectomy did not cause significant difference in both upper and middle thoracic regions. Only 2 complications were seen because of screw insertion. Pedicle screw insertion with guidance of fluoroscopy may be a reliable and safe method for upper and middle thoracic pathologies.

Imaging of the postoperative spine

Spinal instrumentation techniques have expanded dramatically during the past several decades, but the search for the perfect operative approach and fixation system continues. Fixation devices are designed for the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral segments using anterior, posterior, transverse, videoarthroscopic, and combined approaches. In most cases, bone grafting also is performed, because instrument failure occurs if solid bony fusion is not achieved. Radiologists must understand the operative and instrumentation options. Knowledge of expected results, appearance of graft material, and different forms of instrumentation is critical for evaluating position of implants and potential complications associated with operative approaches and spinal fixation devices.

The safety of fluoroscopically-assisted thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation for spine trauma

BACKGROUND

Pedicle screw fixation is considered biomechanically superior to other stabilization constructs. However, the potential for severe complications have discouraged its use in the thoracic spine. Our goal is to determine the incidence of major perioperative complications following the placement of thoracic pedicle screws using anatomic landmarks and intraoperative fluoroscopy in patients with spine fractures.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 245 consecutive patients with spine fractures requiring pedicle screw fixation between T1 and T10 at a regional Level I trauma center between 1995 and 2001. Database and medical record review were used to identify the incidence of major perioperative complications. A major complication was defined as a potentially life-threatening vascular injury, neurologic deterioration, pneumothorax or hemothorax, and tracheoesophageal injury. Patients were monitored for these complications from the time of surgery until discharge.

RESULTS

In all, 1,533 pedicle screws were placed between T1 and T10 in 245 patients. No patient sustained a major complication related to screw placement. Three patients (1.2%) required a secondary procedure for prophylactic revision of four (0.26%) malpositioned screws.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the safety of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine using preoperative imaging evaluation, standard posterior element landmarks and intraoperative fluoroscopy.

Intraoperative adverse events and related postoperative complications in spine surgery: implications for enhancing patient safety founded on evidence-based protocols

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the incidence and clinical consequence of intraoperative adverse events from a wide variety of spinal surgical procedures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In this study, adverse events were defined as any unexpected or undesirable event(s) occurring as a result of spinal surgery. A complication was defined as a disease or disorder, which, as a consequence of a surgical procedure, will negatively affect the outcome of the patient. We hypothesized that most adverse events would not result in complications that would be normally flagged through traditional practice audit approaches. By defining the incidence and types of adverse events seen in a spine surgical practice, we hope to develop preventative approaches to enhance patient safety.

METHODS

All postoperative clinical sequelae (i.e., complications) were prospectively identified, classified as to type, and graded (0 [none] to IV [death]) in 700 consecutive patients who underwent spine surgery (excluding > 300-day surgery microdiscectomies) at a university center from January 2002 to June 2003. To confirm data accuracy and assess the clinical sequelae of any adverse events, the medical records of these 700 patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of intraoperative adverse events was 14% (98/700). A total of 23 adverse events led to postoperative clinical sequelae for an overall intraoperative complication incidence of 3.2% (23/700). Specific adverse events included dural tears (n = 58), spinal instrumentation-related events (n = 12), blood loss exceeding 5000 mL (n = 10), anesthesia/medical (n = 4), suspected or actual vertebral artery injury (n = 3), approach-related events (n = 3), esophageal/pharyngeal injury (n = 2), and miscellaneous (n = 6).

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse events can frequently occur (14%) during spinal surgery, however, the majority (76.5%) are not associated with complications. Improved patient safety can only be maximized by independent practice audit and the development of prospective methods to record adverse event data so that enhanced, evidence-based, clinical protocols can be developed.

Efficacy of Translaminar Facet Screw Fixation in Circumferential Interbody Fusions As Compared to Pedicle Screw Fixation

OBJECTIVES

Posterior lumbar fixation with translaminar facet screws is a minimally invasive technique with good success rates. Long-term follow-ups show reduced reoperation rates, a decrease in pain scores, and few complications compared with pedicle screw fixation devices. The purpose of this study was to compare the reoperation rate of translaminar facet screw fixation with that of pedicle screw fixation in 360 degrees anterior and posterior fusions for incapacitating low back pain due to lumbar disc degeneration unresponsive to at least 6 months of aggressive nonoperative treatment.

METHODS

One hundred five patients underwent a combined circumferential lumbar fusion with posterior fixation for discogenic pain by one surgeon between August 1993 and February 2003. Seventeen patients were excluded from the study owing to their preoperative etiology for fusion or a prior instrumented posterior fusion. A retrospective chart review was done on all 88 remaining patients. Patients were followed in the office, by phone, or by mail to obtain functional outcome measures. Any subsequent operations by this surgeon or another were recorded. The comparison focused on the rate of reoperation on the region of posterior lumbar fixation.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients have had at least a 2-year follow-up. Twenty-four patients had a posterior fusion with pedicle screws, and 43 had translaminar facet screw fixation. Nine patients of the pedicle screw population (37.5%) had a reoperation to remove their instrumentation. Two patients of the translaminar facet screw population (4.7%) had reoperations on their lumbar spine. There was a significant association between posterior instrumentation type and reoperation (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The success of translaminar facet screws in circumferential fusions is justified.

A biomechanical comparison of sacral pedicle screw salvage techniques

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical cadaver study.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of our study was to compare the pullout strength of standard, expandable, and cement-augmented pedicle screws.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Salvage procedures are needed to restore the stability of lumbosacral arthrodesis when pedicle screw fixation in the sacrum fails.

METHODS

Thirteen pairs of sacral (S1) pedicles were implanted initially with 7-mm tapped monoaxial stainless steel pedicle screws (Moss Miami, Depuy Spine, Raynham, MA) inserted under fluoroscopy with bicortical purchase. The screws were distracted axially at a rate of 6 mm/min to measure pullout strength. One pedicle of each pair was assigned randomly to be revised with an expandable pedicle screw (omega-21 Spinal Fixation System, EBI Medical Systems, Parsippany, NJ); the contralateral pedicle was revised with a screw augmented with polymethylmethacrylate (Simplex P, Howmedica, Mahwah, NJ). The screws then were retested as before to measure pullout strength.

RESULTS

Expandable screws (391 +/- 28 N) and polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screws (599 +/- 28 N) exhibited significantly greater pullout strength than their respective initial standard pedicle screws (145 +/- 28 N and 156 +/- 28 N).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that expandable pedicle screws may provide sufficient fixation, but these results need clinical verification.

Miniature robotic guidance for spine surgery — introduction of a novel system and analysis of challenges encountered during the clinical development phase at two spine centres

BACKGROUND

Instrumented spinal fusion surgery is increasingly performed. Breaching of the pedicle occurs in 3-55% of screws; clinically significant screw misplacements occur in 0-7% of all transpedicular screw placements. Several techniques have reduced this incidence but none gained popularity due to cost as well as staff issues. Surgical robots offer distinct added value in accuracy and minimal invasiveness. The aim of this study is to introduce the SpineAssist--a novel spine surgery miniature robot, to discuss the various reasons that had prevented full success with its use, to identify patients related, technical related, and surgeon related issues, and to offer ways to avoid them.

METHODS

The SpineAssist miniature robotic system is presented, including a short description of the system, its mode of action and a short summary of the surgical procedure.15 patients had undergone lumbar fusion procedures using the robotic system as part of clinical trials in two Israeli spine centres. A group of 9 procedures was identified within this prospective cohort. This group represents a wide array of technical challenges and human errors which were encountered during the clinical development phase of the SpineAssist. These 9 cases were conducted in two different sites by different surgical teams, over a period of 9 months, with an average interval of 7 weeks between consecutive cases. The cases were analysed for patient, system, surgeon and technical issues causing the difficulty. Conclusions were drawn as to how to avoid these hurdles in the future.

RESULTS

In six cases the system operated smoothly, resulting in accurate screws placement according to the pre-operative plan, this was confirmed by a post-operative CT scan. Technical and surgical challenges which are associated with the system early development stage were encountered during 9 procedures. On the technical side, the following phenomena were evident: 1) failure of the software to automatically achieve satisfying CT-to-fluoro image registration and 2) failure of the hospital's peripheral equipment/logistics preventing registration. On the clinical side of things, the following issues were encountered: 1) failure to avoid excessive pressure on the guiding arm caused by surrounding soft tissues, leading to a shift in the entry point and trajectory of the tool guide. 2) a surgeon applying too much force on the tool guide at the tip of the robotic arm, causing deviation from plan. 3) pre-operative plan out of the reach of the robot arm and 4) attachment of the clamp to the spinous process in a suboptimal orientation.

CONCLUSIONS

It is expected that following a steep learning curve in the range of 5-10 cases, recommended to take place within 2-3 weeks time, the surgical team will gain sufficient experience in operating the SpineAssist miniature robotic device in order to achieve excellent surgical results. The system may be used for wide range of applications including but not limited to pedicle screws, trans-facet and trans-laminar screws, biopsy needles, vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty tools and more. The preoperative plan has to be logical, intraoperative fluoro images taken with care, gentle surgical technique must be kept - maintaining the integrity of the posterior elements, and avoiding pressure between the robot arms and the soft tissues. During the clinical development phase discussed in this study, both teams used an early version of the system. Based on the results of this study several significant software and hardware improvements have already been implemented. It is our hope that describing and analysing our findings will help in planning and preparing for the clinical utilization of the SpineAssist system in future sites and will shorten their learning curve. By the time this article is published wider clinical experience will have been gathered and we expect to soon follow up with an analysis of clinical utilization of this system in a larger study group.

A functional classification of spinal instrumentation

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spinal instrumentation systems have evolved far beyond the original Harrington design, with increasing complexity and capabilities. This review attempts to de-emphasize the "product names," as systems are often generically and inappropriately referred to as "Harrington rods," by introducing a functional classification for current systems.

PURPOSE

The aim of this paper is to review the intended design purpose of current spinal instrumentation systems for more accurate interpretations of radiographs and complications.

STUDY DESIGN

The principles involved in each type of instrumentation system are described, followed by the characteristic components and the normal appearance radiographically, with examples of complications, which should be recognized.

METHODS

The historical contribution of specific systems in the developing art of internal fixation of the spine is provided as a background to understand the biomechanical forces imparted by spinal hardware. Recognizing the functional intent of spinal constructs will enhance descriptions of those images.

RESULTS

Spinal instrumentation has been categorized into five functional types: Distraction and compression, segmental stabilization, coupled or derotation systems, translational or pedicle screw systems, and anterior instrumentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of radiographs from a functional viewpoint can enhance the descriptive interpretation and specifically allow assessment of the success or of the presence of complications, which are crucial to the analysis of instrumentation effectiveness.

A preliminary study of reliability of impedance measurement to detect iatrogenic initial pedicle perforation (in the porcine model)

Accidental perforation of the vertebral pedicle wall is a well-known complication associated with standard approach of pedicle screw insertion. Depending on detection criteria, more than 20% of screws are reported misplaced. Serious clinical consequences, from dysesthesia to paraplegia, although not common, may result from these misplaced screws. Many techniques have been described to address this issue such as somatosensory evoked potentials, electromyography, surgical navigation, etc. Each of these techniques presents advantages and drawbacks, none is simple and ergonomic. A new drilling tool was evaluated which allows for instant detection of pedicle perforation by emission of variable beeps. This new device is based on two original principles: the device is integrated in the drilling or screwing tool, the technology allows real-time detection of perforation through two independent parameters, impedance variation and evoked muscular contractions. A preliminary animal study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of this system based upon electrical conductivity. A total of 168 manual pedicle drillings followed by insertion of implants were performed in 11 young porcine lumbar and thoracic spines. The presence or absence of perforation detection, which defines the reliability of the device, was correlated with necropsic examination of the spines. Using this protocol the device demonstrated 100% positive predictive value, 96% negative predictive value, 100% specificity, and 97% sensitivity. Of 168 drillings there were three (1.79%) false-negatives, leading to a minor effraction, cranially in the intervertebral disks, nine (5.36%) screw threads breaching the vertebral cortex when inserting screws, although preparation of the holes did not indicate any perforation, 34 (36%) breaches detected by the instrument and not detected by the surgeon. These results confirm that the impedance variation detection capability of this device offers a simple and effective means to detect perforation in vertebral pedicle, prior to insertion of pedicle screws. Due to the porcine nerve root anatomy, it was not possible to evaluate the added benefit of cross-linking impedance and EMG detection. A future clinical study may further explore the subject of current study.

Correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using thoracic pedicle screw fixation versus hook constructs

This retrospective study was undertaken to determine the effectiveness and cost of thoracic pedicle screws versus laminar and pedicle hooks in patients undergoing surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Immediate preoperative and 6-week postoperative radiographs were examined in 25 consecutive cases of children with AIS who were divided into two groups, those with thoracic pedicle screw constructs and those with thoracic hook constructs. Endpoints collected included radiographic measures, complications, surgical time, implant cost, and quality-of-life measures. Ten children underwent spinal fusion using thoracic pedicle screw fixation and 15 underwent thoracic constructs composed of hooks. Similar sex and age distribution were noted in both groups, and among the 20 girls and 5 boys the average age was 14.5. The mean preoperative Cobb angle was 53.5 degrees for the screw group and 52.5 degrees for the hook group. Correction averaged 70.2% for the screw group and 68.1% for the hook group. There were no significant differences between the two patient groups in terms of percentage of or absolute curve change after surgery. The apical vertebral translation, end vertebral tilt angle, and coronal balance did not differ significantly between the two patient groups. Comparison of operative time and quality of life revealed no significant differences. Screw constructs were significantly more expensive than hook constructs. The correction obtained from thoracic pedicle screw fixation is comparable to traditional hook constructs in AIS. Surgery using either construct effectively corrects AIS.

Evaluation of pedicle screw placement in the deformed spine using intraoperative plain radiographs: a comparison with computerized tomography

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an accurate and reliable method to detect malpositioned pedicle screws during thoracic and lumbar spinal deformity operations using intraoperative plain radiographs.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The reliability of pedicle screw assessment using plain radiographs is more difficult during scoliosis operations compared to nondeformed spine operations. Methodology is necessary to document and improve the accuracy of interpretation of intraoperative plain radiographs for deformity surgeries.

METHODS

A total of 789 pedicle screws, including 632 thoracic and 157 lumbar, inserted from T1 to L4 in 49 patients with spinal deformity with postoperative computerized tomography (CT) data were investigated. According to the diagnoses, the number of screws placed was 683 for scoliosis in 43 patients and 106 for kyphosis in 6 patients. The position of the pedicle screw inserted was graded with CT as an acceptable screw (n = 724) versus violated screw (n = 65), defined as the central axis of the inserted pedicle screw out of the outer cortex of the pedicle wall. There were 3 plain radiographic criteria used to judge the accuracy of screw position after minor screw tip position adjustment according to the relative length of the screws in the lateral radiograph: (1) violation of the harmonious segmental change of the tips of the inserted screws with reference to vertebral rotation using the posterior upper spinolaminar junction in the posteroanterior (PA) radiograph (medial or lateral out); (2) no crossing of the medial pedicle wall by the tip of the pedicle screw inserted with reference to the vertebral rotation using the posterior upper spinolaminar junction in the PA radiograph (lateral out); and (3) violation of the imaginary midline of the vertebral body using the posterior upper spinolaminar junction in the PA radiograph by the position of the tip of the inserted pedicle screw (medial out).

RESULTS

Comparative analysis of these pedicle screws using postoperative CT and intraoperative plain radiographs confirmed 65 violated pedicle screws, including 15 medial violations and 50 lateral violations. Of 15 pedicle screws with medial wall violation, 13 showed a loss of harmonious segmental change in the screw tips and violation of the imaginary midline of the vertebral body (sensitivity 0.87, specificity 0.97, and accuracy 0.98). One case showed only a loss of harmonious change in the screw tip, and the other one case did not show any significant plain radiograph findings. Of the 50 pedicle screws with lateral wall violation, 47 cases showed a loss of harmonious segmental change in the screw tips and no crossing of medial pedicle wall by the pedicle screw inserted (sensitivity 0.94, specificity 0.90, and accuracy 0.96). Two cases did not show any significant plain radiograph findings, and the other one case showed only violation of the harmonious segmental change in the screw tips.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative plain radiographs alone using 3 radiographic criteria were very sensitive to detect lateral wall pedicle screw violations, specific for assessing for medial wall violations, and highly accurate for both. This result confirms the ability of careful intraoperative plain radiographic assessment after pedicle screw insertion to detect malpositioned screws, to allow for possible revision during the index operation.

In vitro, biomechanical comparison of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anteriorly placed, low-profile lumbar plate and posteriorly placed pedicle screws or translaminar screws

STUDY DESIGN

An in vitro biomechanical comparison of anteriorly placed lumbar plates, pedicle screws, and translaminar screws in the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) setting.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether an anteriorly placed lumbar plate reduces the flexibility in terms of neutral zone and range of motion of a simulated ALIF, and to compare this reduction in flexibility to that provided by posteriorly placed pedicle screws and translaminar screws.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pedicular and translaminar facet fixation add stability and increase fusion rates, compared with ALIF alone. An anteriorly placed lumbar plate has been introduced to provide stability without the need for a secondary approach. However, this plate has not been evaluated biomechanically.

METHODS

Seven intact, cadaveric lumbar motion segments were tested to +/- 7.5 Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion. Specimens were retested after ALIF, and after subsequent instrumentation with pedicle screws, translaminar screws, and anterior lumbar plates. The range of motion and neutral zone were measured from resulting flexibility curves.

RESULTS

Mean (+/- standard deviation) flexion-extension range of motion for intact segments (9.9 degrees +/- 3.1 degrees ) was significantly reduced to 7.7 degrees +/- 1.8 degrees after ALIF (P = 0.02), and was further reduced to 3.0 degrees +/- 0.9 degrees with lumbar plates (P < 0.001), 1.5 degrees +/- 0.6 degrees with pedicle screws (P < 0.001), and 0.9 degrees +/- 0.4 degrees with translaminar screws (P < 0.001). All 3 devices also reduced flexion-extension neutral zone and torsion neutral zone and range of motion, compared with ALIF alone (P < 0.05). Lumbar plates did not decrease lateral bending range of motion or neutral zone (P > 0.05), whereas pedicle and translaminar screws did (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although not as rigid as pedicle or translaminar screws, anterior lumbar plating does add significant stability to an ALIF and may provide a valuable, single-approach alternative to supplemental posterior fixation.

Surgical treatment for the painful motion segment: matching technology with the indications: posterior lumbar fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A convenience literature-based review of the different techniques of posterior lumbar fusion.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the history, specific techniques, and outcomes of different methods of posterior lumbar fusion. The specific methods that were described include 1) uninstrumented posterior, posterolateral, and facet fusion, and 2) instrumented fusion using pedicle screws or facet screws.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are various posterior fusion techniques available for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine conditions. Each individual technique has specific technical demands, indications, advantages, and disadvantages which should be taken into consideration when performing these procedures.

METHODS

The published scientific literature on the different methods of posterior lumbar fusion was reviewed. The history, indications, advantages, disadvantages, and clinical and radiographic outcomes were described based on the literature search.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

Posterior fusion techniques have been and will continue to be among the most commonly performed procedures in lumbar spine surgery. The different methods of fusion are well defined, as are the possible complications and outcomes. They are effective techniques when performed on appropriately selected patients by a surgeon knowledgeable in the techniques and indications. Further studies are needed regarding promising but relatively unproven developments such as minimally invasive surgery and the use of osteoinductive agents.

Accuracy of computerized frameless stereotactic image-guided pedicle screw placement into previously fused lumbar spines

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart and radiographic review of 122 pedicle screws placed with computerized stereotactic image-guidance into posterolateral fusion masses.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the accuracy rate of computerized stereotactic image-guided pedicle screw placement in previously fused lumbar spines.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Placement of pedicle screws into a previously fused lumbar spine is challenging. The normal anatomic landmarks used to determine the starting point and trajectory of the screws have either been removed or are obscured by the fusion mass. Computerized frameless stereotaxis provides precise intraoperative real time multiplanar image-guidance and may be valuable in this clinical situation.

METHODS

Computerized frameless stereotactic image-guidance was used to place pedicle screws into 78 consecutive patients with prior lumbar spine fusions. Postoperative computed tomography was available on 35 patients (231 screws). One hundred and twenty-two screws were placed into fusion masses. Pedicle cortical perforations were characterized by the direction (medial, inferior, lateral, or superior) and magnitude (in 2-mm increments) of perforation.

RESULTS

Five (4.1%) of the 122 pedicle screws placed into previously fused levels were found to have unintentional cortical violations. There were 1 superior (<2 mm), 1 medial (<2 mm), and 3 lateral perforations (<2, 4, and 6 mm). None of these perforations led to clinically apparent radicular pain or weakness. No pedicle screws required revision for malpositioning.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy rate of stereotactic image-guided pedicle screw placement into previously fused lumbar spine levels is 96%. Computerized stereotactic image-guidance may have particular application in situations in which posterior element anatomy is altered, such as in the presence of a prior fusion mass.

Clinical analysis of percutaneous facet screw fixation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion

Object. The authors performed a retrospective study to evaluate the results of percutaneous facet screw fixation (PFSF) after anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in comparison with the gold standard, post-ALIF pedicle screw fixation (PSF).

Methods. Of 84 patients treated for degenerative spondylolisthesis or degenerative disc disease at the authors' institution, 44 underwent PFSF (Group 1) and 40 underwent PSF (Group 2 [control population]) after ALIF. Function was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scoring system, and outcome was measured using the Macnab criteria. At 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery, dynamic lateral (flexion—extension) radiography and computerized tomography scanning were conducted to evaluate the osseous union status. After a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, analysis showed no intergroup statistical difference in terms of ODI score and Macnab outcome criteria (p > 0.05).

Excellent or good outcome was obtained in 40 (90.9%) of the 44 patients in Group 1 and 37 (92.5%) of the 40 patients in the control Group 2 (p > 0.05). No patient required a blood transfusion in either group. At 24 months after surgery fusion rates were 95.8% in Group 1 and 97.5% in Group 2.

Conclusions. The results of PFSF following ALIF appear to be clinically equivalent to those achieved after PSF, and the procedure represents a safe and minimally invasive modality with which to achieve solid fusion in the lumbar spine.

The effect of pedicle screw placement with or without application of compression across the neurocentral cartilage on the morphology of the spinal canal and pedicle in immature pigs

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental study.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of pedicle screw insertion on spinal canal and pedicle morphology in immature pigs, and, if transpedicular fixation has an effect, to document whether this occurs because of the inhabitance of the screw inside the growth plate (neurocentral cartilage [NCC]) or because of compression applied across the NCC.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Transpedicular fixation has been less commonly applied to the pediatric population, especially because of the risk of damage to the NCC.

METHODS

Twelve newborn pigs (4-6 weeks of age) were operated on. Left sided pedicles from L1-L5 were studied, while right sides served as controls. Pigs were randomly assigned into 3 groups: (1) pedicles were probed only; (2) screws were inserted; and (3) after screw insertion, a washer and a nut were engaged at the pedicle entry point so that gradual compression across the NCC was achieved. After 4 months, spiral computerized tomography was used to measure the pedicle lengths and size of the halves of the spinal canal.

RESULTS

In group 1, the operated hemi-canal area was not statistically different from the nonoperated side (P = 0.159). Pedicle screw insertion either with (P = 0.007) or without (P = 0.005) compression resulted in smaller hemi-canal area and shorter pedicles at the operated side, respectively (P = 0.008, P = 0.021). Approximately 4% to 9% shortening of the pedicle lengths and 20% to 26% narrowing of the hemi-canal areas on the instrumented side occurred with transpedicular instrumentation (groups 2, 3).

CONCLUSION

Even without compression, pedicle screws passing through the NCC in immature pigs disturb spinal canal growth significantly. Clinical relevance for young children should be studied further.

Biomechanical evaluation of an expansive pedicle screw in calf vertebrae

The main objective of the present study is to evaluate biomechanically a newly designed expansive pedicle screw (EPS) using fresh pedicles from calf lumber vertebrae in comparison with conventional pedicle screws, (CDH) CD Horizon, Universal Spine System pedicle screw (USS) and Tenor (Sofamor Denek). Pull-out and turning-back tests were performed on these pedicle screws to compare their holding strength. Additionally, revision tests were undertaken to evaluate the mechanical properties of EPS as a "rescue" revision screw. A fatigue simulation test using a perpendicular load up to 1,500,000 cycles was also carried out. The results showed that the turning back torque (Tmax) and pull-out force (Fmax) of EPS screws were significantly greater than those of USS, Tenor and CDH screws (6.5x40 mm). In revision tests, the Fmax of both types of EPS screws (6.5x40 mm; 7.0x40 mm) were significantly greater than that of CDH, USS, and Tenor screws (P<0.05). Furthermore, no screws were broken or bent at the end of fatigue tests. The findings from the current study suggest that expansive pedicle screws can significantly improve the bone purchase and the pull-out strength compared to USS, Tenor and CDH screws of similar dimensions before and after a failure simulation.

Clinical accuracy of fluoroscopic computer-assisted pedicle screw fixation: a CT analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort study with computerized tomography (CT) analysis of in vivo pedicle screw placement.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical accuracy of computer-assisted fluoroscopy for the placement of thoracic and lumbosacral (LS) pedicle screws.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Computer-assisted fluoroscopy is an adjunct for the placement of pedicle screws.

METHODS

Postoperative CT of 360 titanium pedicle screws (281 LS [L1-S1]; 79 thoracic [T2-T12]) were independently assessed. All screws were placed using the FluoroNav system (Medtronic Surgical Navigation Technologies, Louisville, CO). The relative position of the screw to the pedicle was graded as follows: A = completely in; B = <2 mm breach; C = 2-4 mm breach; and D = >4 mm breach. If an osseous breach occurred, the direction of the breach was further classified.

RESULTS

Eight-five percent of screws were completely contained within the pedicle. Fifty-five-pedicle breaches (25 medial; 30 lateral) occurred. Pedicle breaches were graded B in 13.1% (47 breaches), C in 1.9% (7), and D in 0.3% (1) of screws. Pedicle breach was significantly higher in the thoracic compared to the LS spine, 31.6% (25/79) and 10.6% (30/281), respectively (P < 0.0001). In the thoracic spine, 72% of pedicle breaches were lateral. In 49% of breaches, the screw diameter was larger than the pedicle diameter. None of the pedicle breaches were associated with neurologic or other clinical sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical pedicle breach rate in this study is comparable to those reported using conventional techniques with or without fluoroscopic assistance. FluoroNav appears to be a safe adjunct for the placement of thoracic and LS pedicle screws.

Accuracy and efficacy of thoracic pedicle screws in curves more than 90 degrees

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of large-magnitude thoracic curves (> or =90 degrees ) treated with pedicle screw constructs.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the results of pedicle screw constructs for thoracic curves > or = 90 degrees in terms of sagittal and coronal correction/efficacy, as well as accuracy and safety of thoracic pedicle screw placement.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Thoracic pedicle screw constructs continue to become increasingly more common; however, the debate continues about the safety and efficacy of these constructs because of their perceived increased risk of neurologic injury and the increased cost of spinal instrumentation.

METHODS

Since 1998, all patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, or adult progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, a thoracic curve > or = 90 degrees and a minimum 2-year follow-up who were treated with pedicle screw constructs were included in this study. Standing anteroposterior (or posteroanterior), lateral and bending preoperative radiographs, and anteroposterior (or posteroanterior) and lateral postoperative radiographs were evaluated for curve magnitude, flexibility, and postoperative correction to assess the efficacy of these constructs in the immediate postoperative period and at latest follow-up. Postoperative CT scans were evaluated for screw accuracy using established 2-mm increments (intrapedicular, 0-2 mm breach, 2-4 mm breach, > 4 mm breach). Preoperative plans were also reviewed to evaluate the ability to place a pedicle screw at each planned level in these large-magnitude curves.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with thoracic curves > or = 90 degrees and an average follow-up of 3.3 years (range, 2.0-5.2 years) were included in the study. All patients underwent a posterior spinal fusion with a pedicle screw only construct. The average preoperative main thoracic curve measured 100.2 degrees (range, 90 degrees -133 degrees ), with an average side-bender of 71.6 degrees (29% flexibility). The average postoperative main thoracic curve was 32.3 degrees (68% correction). A total of 352 thoracic screws were placed in the 20 cases (17.6 screws/case). Screw accuracy (either intrapedicular or <2 mm breach) was 96.3% (339 of 352 screws) by postoperative CT scanning. Ten screws were considered to have a breach between 2 and 4 mm (3 medial, 7 lateral), while three screws were > 4 mm (2 medial, 1 lateral). The two medial screws were the only placed screws that were removed (0.57%). Overall, 94% of planned screws (352 of 374 screws) were placed according to the preoperative plan. There were no incidences of screw or instrumentation failure. Of note, there was a temporary decrease in motor-evoked potentials during curve correction in 2 cases; however, there were no identifiable neurologic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic pedicle screw constructs can be safely used for large-magnitude curves. Curve correction (68%) is powerful for these curves, which are stiff and difficult to manage. Correction should be performed carefully with consideration given to convex compression for cases with concomitant hyperkyphosis for these "at risk" spinal cords. Screw accuracy (96.3%) was excellent in this review. The authors found that screws can consistently be placed according to the preoperative plan even in these large-magnitude curves.

Tratamento da instabilidade lombar com parafusos pediculares

A instabilidade lombar é uma doença freqüente na prática clínica. Vários autores preconizam o uso de parafusos pediculares para fixação da artrodese posterior, demonstrando melhores resultados do que a estabilização in situ. OBJETIVO: Avaliar o resultado funcional e radiográfico dos pacientes que procuraram o Grupo de Coluna da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo portadores de instabilidade lombar submetidos ao tratamento cirúrgico pela artrodese vertebral por via posterior utilizando-se fixação metálica representada por parafusos pediculares. MÉTODOS: Foram coletados dados dos prontuários médicos do Serviço de Arquivos Médicos (S.A.M.E) da Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo e avaliação por meio de radiografias simples nas incidências frente, perfil e oblíquas para estudos de imagem além da avaliação funcional pré e pós-operatória, com seguimento mínimo de dois anos. RESULTADOS: Durante o período de Novembro de 1995 à Junho de 2000 avaliamos dez pacientes portadores de instabilidade lombar degenerativa (48%), cinco pacientes com espondilolistese ístmica (23%) e seis com estenose lombar degenerativa (29%). Quanto à avaliação funcional, obtivemos 76% de resultados excelentes e bons. As complicações verificadas foram infecção superficial, pseudartrose e posicionamento inadequado dos parafusos (19%). CONCLUSÕES: Os autores concluem que este método de fixação é eficaz, apresentando fusão da artrodese em 95% dos pacientes.

Occupational gonadal and embryo/fetal doses from fluoroscopically assisted surgical treatments of spinal disorders

STUDY DESIGN

Simulation of lumbar spine fluoroscopy used during surgical treatments of spinal disorders on a humanoid phantom and monitoring of the scattered radiation levels.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the potential of adverse effects to progeny due to the preconceptual and embryo/fetal exposure to ionizing radiation resulting from the parental occupational exposure to scattered radiation from lumbar fluoroscopy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are no available data on embryo/fetal doses resulting from maternal occupational exposure in the orthopedic theater. Besides, studies on staff gonadal doses from fluoroscopically assisted spine surgery are scarce and their results are not generally applicable.

METHODS

Lumbar spine anterior-posterior and lateral fluoroscopy were performed on an anthropomorphic phantom. Scattered radiation within the orthopedic theater was recorded at the staff genitals and waist level. Gonadal, abdominal surface, and embryo/fetal doses normalized to the dose-area-product specific to each projection were calculated.

RESULTS

If the annual dose limits of occupational exposure are continuously exhausted for 10 years, the resulting radiogenic risk of congenital malformation in infants born to the orthopedic theater staff will be at least two orders of magnitude lower than the corresponding spontaneous probability. The occupational exposure of the pregnant mother bears a negligible contribution to the risk of hereditary effect on the newborn's progeny compared with the natural incidence rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiogenic genetic and embryo/fetal risks resulting from occupational exposure due to fluoroscopically assisted surgical treatments of spinal disorders are well within tolerance levels provided that rigorous confinement to all pertinent occupational dose constraints is established.

Posterior augmentation of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive fixation versus pedicle screws in vitro

STUDY DESIGN

An in vitro biomechanical comparison of four posterior fixation techniques in the setting of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the initial stability, in terms of range of motion and neutral zone, provided by pedicle screws, facet screws, translaminar facet screws, and H-graft plus interspinous cables in the presence of an anteriorly placed femoral ring allograft.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pedicular fixation has been used to increase ALIF fusion rates but has also been linked with increased morbidity. Alternative posterior fixation options are available, but comprehensive biomechanical comparisons of these techniques do not exist. METHODS.: Twelve cadaveric lumbar motion segments were loaded to 5 Nm in unconstrained flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion. Specimens were tested intact, after ALIF, and after applying pedicle screws, translaminar screws, facet screws, and H-graft plus cables. The resulting neutral zones and ranges of motion were measured.

RESULTS

The mean (+/-SEM) range of motion for each construct in flexion-extension was as follows: intact: 6.39 degrees (+/-0.47 degrees); ALIF alone: 3.31 degrees (+/-0.22 degrees); (ALIF+) pedicle screws: 0.6 degrees (+/-0.06 degrees); facet screws: 0.75 degrees (+/-0.12 degrees); translaminar screws: 0.61 degrees (+/-0.09 degrees); and H-graft: 1.74 degrees (+/-0.26 degrees). Pedicle, translaminar facet, and facet screws significantly decreased range of motion and neutral zone compared to ALIF alone in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion (all at P < 0.04, except translaminar screws in torsion neutral zone where P = 0.09). H-graft decreasedflexion-extension range of motion and neutral zone only (P < 0.01) and resulted in a significantly greater neutral zone than pedicle and facet screws in torsion and lateral bending neutral zones (P < 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In the ALIF setting, facet screw and translaminar screw techniques, which may be associated with less morbidity than pedicle screws clinically, provided initial posterior stabilization similar to pedicular fixation in this in vitro study.

Treatment of fixed thoracolumbar kyphosis in immature achondroplastic patient: posterior column resection combined with segmental pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion

A 13-year-old male achondroplastic dwarf with fixed thoracolumbar kyphosis was treated by segmental pedicle screw fixation, posterolateral fusion combined with one stage two level posterior column resection. Preoperative and postoperative kyphosis angles were 97 and 32 degrees, respectively. Combination of segmental pedicle instrumentation with posterior column resection is a treatment option even in immature achondroplastic patients.

Complications per et postopératoires immédiates des arthrodèses lombaires et lombosacrées

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Incidence of complications following lumbar or lumbosacral fusion is still an imprecise notion. The aim of this prospective observational study was to determine the frequency of intraoperative and early postoperative complications after this procedure and to analyze favoring factors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-one orthopedic units participated in this study which included 872 patients who underwent lumbar or lumbosacral fusion procedures involving the sector limited by L1 and S1. A minimum of 6 months follow-up was required for inclusion. Four types of complications were studied: general complications, infection, neurological and meningeal complications, mechanical problems. The following preoperative and intraoperative parameters were recorded: epidemiological and morphological data, history of lumbar spine surgery, comorbid conditions, indication for surgery, and technical aspects of the fusion. Two types of analysis were performed. The first was a descriptive analysis designed to determined the overall incidence of complications and the incidence of each type of complication. A multivariate analysis was then performed in order to determine factors influencing occurrence of complications.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 13 months, mean age of the cohort was 51 +/- 15.5 years. Prior lumbar surgery was noted in 12% of the patients. A decompression procedure was associated in 40% of the patients due to lumbar stenosis. Posterolateral arthrodesis was used in 71% of the patients and 91% were instrumented. Most of the fusions were short, involving one or two levels. One or more intraoperative or early postoperative complications were observed in 200 patients (23%). The incidences of the four types of complications expressed in percent of the total cohort were 9.7%, 5.6%, 8.6%, and 3.6% for general, infectious, neurological and meningeal, and mechanical complications respectively. Three factors exhibited a significant correlation with occurrence of complications, irrespective of the type: excess weight, presence of several comorbid conditions, and extent of the zone of fusion.

CONCLUSION

This study enabled a precise assessment of the incidence of complications subsequent to lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: 23%. The incidence of serious complications requiring a reoperation was 14.7%. This finding, together with the factors found to influence occurrence of these complications should be kept in mind when determining indications for lumbar or lumbosacral fusion.

Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe?

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of a free hand technique of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine at a single institution over a 10-year experience.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Thoracic pedicle screw fixation techniques are still controversial for thoracic deformities because of possible complications including neurologic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three hundred ninety-four consecutive patients who underwent posterior stabilization utilizing 3204 transpedicular thoracic screws by 2 surgeons from 1992 to 2002 were analyzed. The mean age was 27 + 10 years (range 5 + 3-87 + 0 years) at the time of surgery. Etiologic diagnoses were: scoliosis in 273, kyphosis in 53, other spinal disease in 68. Pedicle screws were inserted using a free hand technique similar to that used in the lumbar spine in which anatomic landmarks and specific entry sites were used to guide the surgeon. A 2-mm tip pedicle probe was carefully advanced free hand down the pedicle into the body. Careful palpation of all bony borders (floor and four pedicle walls) was performed before and after tapping. Next, the screw was placed, followed by neurophysiologic (screw stimulation with rectus abdominus muscle recording) and radiographic (anteroposterior and lateral) confirmation. An independent spine surgeon using medical records and roentgenograms taken during treatment and follow-up reviewed all the patients.

RESULTS

The number of the screws inserted at each level were as follows (total n = 3204): T1, n = 13; T2, n = 60; T3, n = 192; T4, n = 275; T5, n = 279; T6, n = 240; T7, n = 230; T8, n = 253; T9, n = 259; T10, n = 341; T11, n = 488; T12, n = 572. Five hundred seventy-seven screws inserted into the deformed thoracic spine were randomly evaluated by thoracic computed tomography scan to assess for screw position. Thirty-six screws (6.2%) were inserted with moderate cortical perforation, which meant the central line of the pedicle screw was out of the outer cortex of the pedicle wall and included 10 screws (1.7%) that violated the medial wall. There were no screws (out of the entire study group of 3204) with any neurologic, vascular, or visceral complications with up to 10 years follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The free hand technique of thoracic pedicle screw placement performed in a step-wise, consistent, and compulsive manner is an accurate, reliable, and safe method of insertion to treat a variety of spinal disorders, including spinal deformity.

The effects from lumbar nerve root transection in rats on spinal somatosensory and motor-evoked potentials

STUDY DESIGN

Spinal somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs), elicited by mixed nerve and dermatomal stimulation, and compound evoked muscle potentials (CMAPs), elicited by lower thoracic interspinous space stimulation, were recorded in rats that underwent single nerve root transection.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate and compare the effects of single nerve root transection using various electrophysiological models and to define a monitoring strategy that can easily and accurately predict compromise caused by a single lumbosacral nerve root injury.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Neuromonitoring is an important and effective preventive measure against neurologic complications during spinal surgery, but monitoring the lumbosacral nerve roots is not well established.

METHODS

Rats received (Group I) a sham operation or had the (Group II) left L4, (Group III) L5, or (Group IV) L6 nerve root transected. SSEP were recorded at the thoracolumbar junction following stimulation of the sciatic nerve (M-SSEP) and the L5 dermatome (D-SSEP). CMAP was recorded at the intrinsic muscles of the foot by electrical stimulation in the lower thoracic spinal cord. Potentials recorded before and after a single nerve root transection were compared and correlated with clinical status by walking-track analysis 1 week later.

RESULTS

Relative amplitudes in Group II were 54.1% (M-SSEP), 84.6% (D-SSEP), and 85.5% (CMAP); 25.2% (M-SSEP), 66.5% (D-SSEP), and 85.8% (CMAP) in Group III; and 66.5% (M-SSEP), 95.5% (D-SSEP), and 23.2% (CMAP) in Group IV. M-SSEP is sensitive but not specific to single nerve root injury. D-SSEP and CMAP are less sensitive but more specific.

CONCLUSIONS

Injury to a single lumbosacral nerve root is diagnosed more easily with M-SSEP. With D-SSEP and CMAP, it was possible to differentiate the lesioned nerve root by stimulating the primary dermatome or recording from the innervated muscle. M-SSEP is an easy-sampling and appropriate tool for screening nerve root injury; its poor specificity may be overcome by using D-SSEP and CMAP in addition. Optimal monitoring of the lumbosacral nerve roots during lumbar spinal surgery requires the administration of M-SSEP, D-SSEP, and CMAP to provide independent verification of lumbosacral nerve root integrity and to allow detection of the occasional injuries that selectively affect either the sensory or motor system.

The influence of material and design features on the mechanical properties of transpedicular spinal fixation implants

This study describes the finding and performance of mechanical strength and corrosion testing procedures for comparative examination of multiple internal transpedicular spine fixators. Seven different implant models from five different manufacturers were compared regarding their bending strength and fatigue resistance. Because of the unacceptably high levels of time and material that they require, ISO and ASTM testing standards are not applicable to comparative testing. In addition, there is a lack of knowledge about clinically defined and proven strength-limit values. Therefore, actual standard testing procedures have been modified and extended to corrosion testing. Overall, the effort necessary to obtain reproducible comparative data has been reduced significantly. Although a reduced number of implants of each type were available for destructive testing, the results revealed fundamental differences in the tested implants between different materials and design features. During fatigue testing some of the implants showed poor corrosion properties. Because spinal fixation implants tend to be used as long-duration implants, corrosion testing as well as comparative strength testing with clinically successful implant models should be performed as preclinical evaluations.

Lumbosacral fusion using the Boucher technique in combination with a posterolateral bone graft

This study evaluates the clinical and radiological results of using the facet screw fixation technique described by Boucher in combination with a posterolateral fusion rather than a posterior fusion for symptomatic degenerative disease of the lumbosacral junction. It is a retrospective review of 38 consecutive patients with an average follow-up of 28 months. Radiologically, all patients had a solid fusion. Clinically, 23 patients (60%) had excellent results, 11 patients (29%) good results, 3 patients (8%) fair results and 1 patient (3%) had a poor result. There were no neurological complications. The findings support the view that the Boucher technique of facet joint fixation in combination with a posterolateral fusion is a safe and effective method of dealing with chronic symptoms relating to degenerative changes at the lumbosacral junction. The authors stress the importance of patient selection and attention to operative technique if the clinical results are to correlate with the results of fusion.

A 10-year follow-up evaluation of lumbar spine fusion with pedicle screw fixation

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study was conducted.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term results of lumbar spine fusion supplemented with pedicle screw fixation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine is widely used, yet there is little long-term follow-up information on the technique.

METHODS

All adult patients treated at the University of Iowa Department of Orthopedic Surgery with lumbar pedicle screw fixation between March 10, 1986 and July 1, 1991 were reviewed. All the patients initially had answered a battery of questions regarding pain and disability and had radiographs performed. At follow-up evaluation, the same and other questions regarding their status were asked, and SF-36 was used. Radiographs were reviewed for evidence of hardware complications, fusion status, deformity, and extent of degeneration around the fusion.

RESULTS

In this study, 234 patients underwent 236 pedicle screw fixation procedures. Indications for surgery were degeneration (n = 127), trauma/instability (n = 33), pseudarthrosis (n = 17), deformity (n = 16), tumor (n = 4), inflammatory process (n = 4), infection (n = 1), and unknown (n = 32). Variable screw placement (Acromed, Cleveland Ohio) fixation was used in all cases. Nonintegral locking nuts were used in 119 cases. Of the 234 patients, 31 had died, 5 had been eliminated because the chart review indicated that their reason for surgery was tumor or infection, and 92 were lost to follow-up evaluation for various reasons. Of the remaining 107 patients, 13 had incomplete data, leaving 94 patients with complete information. The SF-36 showed reports of bodily pain and physical functioning below age- and gender-adjusted means, but disability and function scores demonstrated significant improvement at the 10-year follow-up assessment. Patient-reported satisfaction was high, approximately 80%. Radiographically, at the 10-year follow-up assessment, 242 of 244 instrumented segments showed no motion, with approximately one third of these also showing evidence of definite fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

At a minimum follow-up evaluation of 10 years, lumbar fusion with pedicle screw fixation showed relatively good functional capacity, especially relative to the baseline, a low rate of radiographic failure, satisfaction of patients with their progress, a low rate of repeat surgery, and minimal surgical and hardware-related complications.

A biomechanical comparison of facet screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation: effects of short-term and long-term repetitive cycling

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical study was conducted to assess the stabilization performance of transfacet pedicle screw fixation.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the biomechanical effects of short-term and long-term cyclic loading on lumbar motion segments instrumented with either a pedicle screw or a transfacet pedicle screw construct.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Facet screw fixation is an alternative to pedicle screw fixation that permits the use of a minimally invasive strategy. It is not known whether facet screw fixation can provide stability equivalent to pedicle screw fixation during cyclical loading. Therefore, transfacet pedicle screw fixation and standard pedicle screw fixation techniques were compared biomechanically.

METHODS

Lumbar motion segments were tested under short-term and long-term cyclic loading conditions. For the short-term phase, specimens were tested intact for six cycles (to 400 N or 4 Nm) in compression, flexion, extension, lateral bending, and torsion. The specimens then were instrumented with bilateral semicircular interbody spacers and pedicle screw instrumentation or transfacet pedicle screws, and the testing sequence was repeated. For the long-term phase, 12 specimens were instrumented in a similar manner and loaded to 6 Nm of flexion bending for 180,000 cycles.

RESULTS

For the short-term phase, both fixation systems had significantly greater stiffness and reduced range of motion, as compared with the intact state. No differences were observed between the fixation systems except in flexion, wherein transfacet pedicle screw specimens were significantly stiffer than traditional pedicle screw specimens. For the long-term phase, the stiffness and range of motion did not significantly increase or decrease over repetitive cycling of the instrumented specimens. Furthermore, no significant difference between the fixation systems was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The stability provided by both transfacet pedicle screw fixation and traditional pedicle screw fixation was not compromised after repetitive cycling. In this model, transfacet pedicle screw fixation appears equivalent biomechanically to traditional pedicle screw fixation.

Measurements of the lumbar pedicles in the Eastern Anatolian population

Pedicle screw fixation of the spine has become one of the most stable and versatile methods of spine fixation, and knowledge of pedicle morphology is crucial for the safe application of these systems. We undertook this study because only a few reports have investigated Eastern populations. Lumbar pedicle anatomy, i.e., pedicle width (PW) and pedicle height (PH), transverse and sagittal pedicle angles (TPA, SPA), and pedicle length (PL), were assessed in the following two groups: (1) computed tomography scans of 29 normal adults, and (2) 16 dried lumbar spines obtained from the Anatomy Department. Interpedicular distance was different in each group. PW ranged from 4 mm to 14 mm. In both groups, the narrowest PH was 8.2 mm, the widest 19.7 mm. TPA ranged from 6(o) to 19(o) and increased from L1 to L5. In the sagittal plane, the pedicles angled caudally at L5. PL was longest at L1 and shortest at L5. In conclusion, pedicle dimensions and angles may show individual and structural differences. Our data were not significantly different from previous reported data. A detailed knowledge of these relationships is important for any surgery involving screw purchase via a pedicle, to prevent screw cutout and failure of fixation or neurological injury. Selection of the proper diameter of screw is an important issue for safe placement. Knowledge of the pedicle axis length is essential in choosing screw lengths but should always be checked intraoperatively with fluoroscopic control during screw insertion.

Spinal somatosensory evoked potential evaluation of acute nerve-root injury associated with pedicle-screw placement procedures: an experimental study

Pedicle screws for spinal fixation risk neural damage because of the proximity between screw and nerve root. We assessed whether spinal somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) could selectively detect pedicle-screw-related acute isolated nerve injury. Because pedicle screws are too large for a rat's spine, we inserted a K-wire close to the pedicle in 32 rats, intending not to injure the nerve root in eight (controls), and to injure the L4 or L5 root in 24. We used sciatic-nerve-elicited SSEP pre- and postinsertion. Radiologic, histologic, and postmortem observations confirmed the level and degree of root injury. Sciatic (SFI), tibial (TFI), and peroneal function indices (PFI) were calculated and correlated with changes in potential. Although not specific for injuries to different roots, amplitude reduction immediately postinsertion was significant in the experimental groups. Animals with the offending wire left in place for one hour showed a further non-significant deterioration of amplitude. Electrophysiologic changes correlated with SFI and histologic findings in all groups. SSEP monitoring provided reliable, useful diagnostic and intraoperative information about the functional integrity of single nerve-root injury. These findings are clinically relevant to acute nerve-root injury and pedicle-screw insertion. If a nerve-root irritant remains in place, a considerable neurologic deficit will occur.

Radiologic evaluation of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation following transpedicular instrumentation of the lumbar spine

STUDY DESIGN

The location of pedicle screws in relation to adjacent superior segment facet joints in 106 patients after lumbar spinal fusion was assessed using computed tomography and plain radiographs.

OBJECTIVES

To document the incidence of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation following transpedicular instrumentation in the lumbar spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Review of the literature failed to show any documented study examining this incidence.

METHODS

A total of 106 patients (212 top-level facet screws) undergoing lumbar spinal fusion surgery using transpedicular instrumentation between 1996 and 1999 were prospectively evaluated with a computed tomography scan and plain radiographs at 6 months following surgery. These were blindly and independently evaluated by a consultant radiologist and a spinal research fellow to document the incidence of superior segment facet joint violation. Calculation of the kappa coefficient and chi2 analysis were carried out.

RESULTS

The spinal research fellow noted the incidence of facet joint violation on the computed tomography scan to be present in 20% of the screws and 32% of the patients, whereas the consultant radiologist noted this to be the case in 23% and 35%, respectively. The kappa coefficient for computed tomography scan was 0.88, whereas for the plain radiographs it was 0.39. The incidence of facet joint violation was noted to be independent of the sex, level, and diagnosis. There was also an almost uniform incidence in each of the years from 1996 to 1999.

CONCLUSION

Facet joint violation occurred in just >30% of the patients and 20% of the screws in this study. This, therefore, raises the theoretical possibility of long-term deterioration in the clinical results following the use of transpedicular instrumentation.

Fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw fixation for thoracic and thoracolumbar injuries: technique and short-term complications

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of charts and fluoroscopic, radiographic, and computed tomography images for 252 screws (41 patients).

OBJECTIVES

To describe a fluoroscopically assisted technique of thoracic pedicle screw insertion and to determine the technique's safety, short-term complications, and accuracy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pedicle screw instrumentation is safe and effective for lumbar spine stabilization, but evidence of its accuracy and complications in the thoracic spine is lacking.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2000, 41 consecutive patients with unstable cervicothoracic, thoracic, and thoracolumbar spine injuries were admitted to a regional, level 1 trauma center. These patients underwent posterior spine arthrodesis and pedicle screw instrumentation placed intraoperative multiplanar fluoroscopic imaging. Pedicle screw placement accuracy was determined by review of postoperative computed tomography scans. Instrumentation failure prevalence was determined by review of fluoroscopic images, postoperative radiographs, and computed tomography scans. Neurologic, infectious, vascular, and gastrointestinal complications were determined by review of operative reports, hospital records, and clinic notes.

RESULTS

Of the 126 (50%) thoracic screws (22 patients) with postoperative computed tomography scans, 16 (12.7%) penetrated the pedicle cortex (4 [2.4%] medially and 13 [10.3%] laterally) and 7 (5.6%) penetrated the vertebral body. There were four surgical complications: one instrumentation failure (broken rod, no loss of correction), one deep infection, and two superficial infections. The infections resolved with irrigation, debridement, and intravenous antibiotics. During the 6- to 24-month follow-up period, there were no neurologic, vascular, or gastrointestinal complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervicothoracic, thoracic, and thoracolumbar spine injuries can be managed safely and effectively with thoracic pedicle screws inserted under multiplanar fluoroscopic imaging.

The treatment of unstable thoracic spine fractures with transpedicular screw instrumentation: a 3-year consecutive series

STUDY DESIGN

The treatment of unstable thoracic spine fractures remains controversial. Theoretical biomechanical advantages of transpedicular screw fixation include three-column control of vertebral segments and fixation of a vertebral segment in the absence of intact posterior elements. Additionally, pedicle screw constructs may obviate the need for neural canal dissection and potential neural element impingement by intracanal instrumentation. A 3-year consecutive series was performed to evaluate the use of transpedicular screw fixation in the treatment of unstable thoracic spine injuries.

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of transpedicular screw fixation in the upper, middle, and lower thoracic spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The use of rod/hook and rod/wiring techniques has been evaluated in the treatment of thoracic spine injuries. To date, a study evaluating the safety and efficacy of pedicle screw instrumentation in the upper, middle, and lower thoracic spine has not been reported.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with 79 individual vertebral injury levels (T2-L1) treated with transpedicular spinal stabilization and bone fusion were evaluated during a 3-year consecutive series from 1998 to 2001. Patient charts, operative reports, preoperative and postoperative radiographs, computed tomography scans, and postoperative follow-up examinations and radiographs were reviewed from the time of surgery to final follow-up assessment. Radiographic measurements included: sagittal index, Gardner segmental kyphotic deformity, and compression percentage.

RESULTS

A total of 252 pedicle screws were placed, of which 222 were placed in segments T2-L1. Clinical examination and plain radiographs were used to determine the presence of a solid fusion. Fracture healing and radiographic stabilization occurred at an average of 4.8 months after the initial operation. There were no reported cases of hardware failure, loss of reduction, or painful hardware removal. Two hundred fifty-two transpedicular screws were successfully placed without intraoperative complications. The mean preoperative sagittal index was 13.9 degrees, whereas the mean follow-up was 5.25 degrees (P < 0.001). The mean final correction of sagittal index achieved was 8.65 degrees, or a 62.2% improvement. The mean Gardner segmental kyphotic angle was 15.9 degrees, whereas the mean follow-up angle was 10.6 degrees (P < 0.0005). The mean compression percentage was 35.4, and at follow-up was 27.4 (P < 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

In carefully selected instances, pedicle screw fixation of upper, middle, and lower thoracic and upper thoracolumbar spinal injuries is a reliable and safe method of posterior spinal stabilization. Transpedicular screw fixation may offer superior three-column control in the absence of posterior element integrity and obviates the need for intracanal placement of hardware. Transpedicular instrumentation provides rigid fixation for upper, middle, and lower unstable thoracic spine injuries and produces early pain-free fusion results. These results provide evidence that with appropriate preoperative radiographic evaluation of pedicular size and orientation using computed tomography as well as radiograph assessment, transpedicular instrumentation is a safe and effective alternative in the treatment of unstable thoracic (T2-L1) spinal injuries.