The biology of fear- and anxiety-related behaviors

The localization of brain sites of anxiogenic-like effects of urocortin-2

The influence of intracerebroventricullary-administered urocortin-2, a selective corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 2 (CRF(2)) agonist, on rat anxiety-like behaviour, the expression of c-Fos and CRF, and plasma corticosterone levels was examined in the present study. When applied to animals exposed to the conditioned fear-induced context, urocortin-2 enhanced a conditioned freezing fear response. Urocortin-2 also significantly decreased rat exploratory activity in the open field test. Exogenous urocortin-2 increased the conditioned fear-induced expression of c-Fos in the central amygdala (CeA), and parvocellular neurons of the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus (pPVN), and revealed the effect of conditioned fear in the medial amygdala (MeA). In the fear-conditioned animals, immunocytochemistry showed an increase in the density of CRF-related immunoreactive complexes in the lateral septum (LS), 35min after urocortin-2 administration and 10min after the conditioned fear test, compared with saline-pretreated fear-conditioned animals. These data suggest a role of urocortin-2 in the behavioural and immunocytochemical responses to stress, in which it strengthens the measures of anxiety-like responses.

Animal models of anxiety disorders in rats and mice: some conceptual issues

Animal models can certainly be useful to find out more about the biological bases of anxiety disorders and develop new, more efficient pharmacological and/or behavioral treatments. However, many of the current "models of anxiety" in animals do not deal with pathology itself, but only with extreme forms of anxiety which are still in the normal, adaptive range. These models have certainly provided a lot of information on brain and behavioral mechanisms which could be involved in the etiology and physiopathology of anxiety disorders, but are usually not satisfactory when confronted directly with clinical syndromes. Further progress in this field will probably depend on the finding of endophenotypes which can be studied in both humans and animals with common methodological approaches. The emphasis should be on individual differences in vulnerability, which have to be included in animal models. Finally, progress will also depend on refining theoretical constructs from an interdisciplinary perspective, including psychiatry, psychology, behavioral sciences, genetics, and other neurosciences.