352
|
Marner L, Nysom K, Sehested A, Borgwardt L, Mathiasen R, Henriksen OM, Lundemann M, Munck Af Rosenschöld P, Thomsen C, Bøgeskov L, Skjøth-Rasmussen J, Juhler M, Kruse A, Broholm H, Scheie D, Lauritsen T, Forman JL, Wehner PS, Højgaard L, Law I. Early Postoperative 18F-FET PET/MRI for Pediatric Brain and Spinal Cord Tumors. J Nucl Med 2019; 60:1053-1058. [PMID: 30683767 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.220293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Complete resection is the treatment of choice for most pediatric brain tumors, but early postoperative MRI for detection of residual tumor may be misleading because of MRI signal changes caused by the operation. PET imaging with amino acid tracers in adults increases the diagnostic accuracy for brain tumors, but the literature in pediatric neurooncology is limited. A hybrid PET/MRI system is highly beneficial in children, reducing the number of scanning procedures, and this is to our knowledge the first larger study using PET/MRI in pediatric neurooncology. We evaluated if additional postoperative 18F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET in children and adolescents would improve diagnostic accuracy for the detection of residual tumor as compared with MRI alone and would assist clinical management. Methods: Twenty-two patients (7 male; mean age, 9.5 y; range, 0-19 y) were included prospectively and consecutively in the study and had 27 early postoperative 18F-FET PET exams performed preferentially in a hybrid PET/MRI system (NCT03402425). Results: Using follow-up (93%) or reoperation (7%) as the reference standard, PET combined with MRI discriminated tumor from treatment effects with a lesion-based sensitivity/specificity/accuracy (95% confidence intervals) of 0.73 (0.50-1.00)/1.00 (0.74-1.00)/0.87 (0.73-1.00) compared with MRI alone: 0.80 (0.57-1.00)/0.75 (0.53-0.94)/0.77 (0.65-0.90); that is, the specificity for PET/MRI was 1.00 as compared with 0.75 for MRI alone (P = 0.13). In 11 of 27 cases (41%), results from the 18F-FET PET scans added relevant clinical information, including one scan that directly influenced clinical management because an additional residual tumor site was identified. 18F-FET uptake in reactive changes was frequent (52%), but correct interpretation was possible in all cases. Conclusion: The high specificity for detecting residual tumor suggests that supplementary 18F-FET PET is relevant in cases where reoperation for residual tumor is considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisbeth Marner
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Karsten Nysom
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Astrid Sehested
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Lise Borgwardt
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - René Mathiasen
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Otto Mølby Henriksen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Michael Lundemann
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | | | - Carsten Thomsen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.,Department of Radiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Lars Bøgeskov
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | | | - Marianne Juhler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Anders Kruse
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Helle Broholm
- Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - David Scheie
- Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Torsten Lauritsen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Julie Lyng Forman
- Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; and
| | - Peder Skov Wehner
- Hans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Liselotte Højgaard
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|