Triple therapy in treatment-experienced patients with HCV-cirrhosis in a multicentre cohort of the French Early Access Programme (ANRS CO20-CUPIC) - NCT01514890

Managing HIV/hepatitis C co-infection in the era of direct acting antivirals

Morbidity and mortality from co-morbid hepatitis C (HCV) infection in HIV co-infected patients are increasing; hence, the management of hepatitis co-infection in HIV is now one of the most important clinical challenges. Therefore, the development of direct acting antivirals (DAAs) for treatment of HCV has been eagerly awaited to hopefully improve HCV treatment outcome in co-infected individuals. Indeed, the availability of the first HCV protease inhibitors (PI) boceprevir and telaprevir for HCV genotype 1 patients has changed the gold standard of treating hepatitis C allowing for substantially improved HCV cure rates under triple HCV-PI/pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy. Moreover, numerous other new DAAs are currently being studied in co-infected patient populations, also exploring shorter treatment durations and interferon-free treatment approaches promising much easier and better tolerated treatment regimens in the near future. Nevertheless, numerous challenges remain, including choice of patients to treat, potential for drug-drug interactions and overlapping toxicities between HIV and HCV therapy. The dramatically improved rates of HCV cure under new triple therapy, however, warrant evaluation of these new treatment options for all co-infected patients.

Telaprevir-based triple therapy for chronic hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis: a prospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

Antiviral treatment is recommended for chronic hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis to reduce and prevent cirrhosis-related complications.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of telaprevir (TVR)-based triple therapy for patients with advanced fibrosis in a clinical practice setting.

METHODS

This prospective, multicentre study consisted of 102 patients with advanced fibrosis (METAVIR score F3-4) who were infected with HCV genotype 1b. All received 12 weeks of TVR in combination with 24 weeks of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) α2b and ribavirin (RBV).

RESULTS

The sustained virological response (SVR) rate was 69.6% (71 of 102). Notably, for treatment-naïve and prior relapse patients the SVR rate was over 80%. Previous treatment response, interleukin 28B polymorphism (rs8099917) and rapid virological response (undetectable HCV RNA at week 4) were independently associated with SVR. To achieve SVR, an adequate dosage of PEG-IFNα2b (≥1.2 μg/kg/week) and RBV (≥7.5 mg/kg/day) is preferable; however, the mean weight-adjusted TVR dosage had little impact on treatment outcome. Although severe blood cytopaenia and a dermatological disorder were frequently found, the rate of discontinuation due to adverse effects was 12.7%. The inosine triphosphatase CC allele (rs1127354) was independently associated with the development of severe anaemia, and lower serum albumin level (<35 g/L) was associated with the occurrence of infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The great gain in the SVR rate by telaprevir-based triple therapy offsets the problems with adverse effects; thus, it should be considered as a potent treatment protocol for patients with advanced fibrosis, especially for those with treatment-naïve and prior relapse.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of telaprevir in chronic hepatitis C patients receiving telaprevir-based triple therapy is useful for predicting virological response

OBJECTIVES

This prospective, pharmacokinetic study was done to investigate the impact of telaprevir plasma trough concentration (Ctrough) in the early stage of treatment on the response to telaprevir-based triple therapy for chronic hepatitis C patients.

METHODS

Participants were 70 chronic hepatitis C patients infected with genotype 1. All patients received 12 week triple therapy that included telaprevir (2250 mg/day), pegylated interferon-α2b (pegylated-IFNα2b) (60-150 μg/week) and ribavirin (600-1000 mg/day) followed by a 12 week dual therapy that included pegylated-IFNα2b and ribavirin. Plasma telaprevir Ctrough was determined by a validated assay using HPLC at days 3, 7 and 14. The study was registered as a clinical trial on the University Hospital Medical Information Network (ID 000009656).

RESULTS

The rates of undetectable hepatitis C virus RNA at week 4 [rapid virological response (RVR)] and at 24 weeks after therapy [sustained virological response (SVR)] were 71.4% and 82.9%, respectively. Of the patients with RVR, 90% achieved SVR. The mean telaprevir Ctrough levels at days 3, 7 and 14 of SVR patients (2.748, 2.733 and 2.999 μg/mL, respectively) were significantly higher than those of non-SVR patients (1.616, 1.788 and 2.314 μg/mL, respectively) (all P < 0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis of possible predictors of SVR extracted higher telaprevir Ctrough at day 3 (OR 1.012 by 0.001 μg/mL, P < 0.0001) and interleukin 28B (rs8099917) TT allele (OR 6.16 versus non-TT alleles, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic drug monitoring of telaprevir in the early stage of treatment is useful in clinical practice for predicting the virological response of patients receiving telaprevir-based triple therapy.

The pharmacokinetic evaluation of boceprevir for treatment of hepatitis C virus

INTRODUCTION

Boceprevir is an NS3/NS4A serine protease inhibitor that was approved for use in Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 patients by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in May 2011. The approval of this protease inhibitor marked a major paradigm shift in the treatment of HCV, as it was one of the first of many new small molecules specifically designed and approved for HCV.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, the authors summarize boceprevir's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. In addition, they review Phase II and III trials of boceprevir as well as its clinical efficacy, dosing and safety.

EXPERT OPINION

Boceprevir is a potent protease inhibitor for the treatment of genotype 1 HCV. It has a well-tolerated side-effect profile and increases the likelihood of SVR in naïve and previously treated patients. The impending release of newer more efficacious direct-acting antivirals may limit the use of boceprevir for patients infected with HCV.

Safety of direct antiviral agents in real life

Advanced liver fibrosis is a recognized barrier to both access and response to triple therapy with protease inhibitors Boceprevir and Telaprevir, and is associated with an increased risk of severe treatment-related adverse events. While not properly addressed by registration trials enrolling highly selected populations, this nuance of protease inhibitors triple therapy for hepatitis C virus genotype 1 was highlighted by the observational study CUPIC conducted in France. The study enrolled a large number of patients, beyond the safety criteria of registration trials, thereby ending in worrisome safety profiles of protease inhibitors regimens in patients with severe liver impairment who in the past had safely, but unsuccessfully, been exposed to dual therapy with interferon and ribavirin. Indeed, protease inhibitors therapy led to alarming rates of infection and clinical decompensation, particularly in patients with reduced hepatic reserve as predicted by the low platelets and albumin levels. Ultimately antiviral therapy resulted in a death rate of up to 2% and a treatment discontinuation rate of 26%, not to mention the increased need of bone marrow stimulating factors and blood transfusions. The 16-week interim report of the HEP3002 trial expanded the access program to Telaprevir, enrolling patients with advanced fibrosis who fulfilled the safety criteria of registration trials only, and offered an unbiased evaluation of Telaprevir tolerability and safety in this most in-need population, since the rates of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events were up to 14%.

Management of anaemia and other treatment complications

Antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus infection has dramatically changed with the advent of triple therapy including telaprevir or boceprevir, which is associated with a new spectrum of adverse events. These may lead to dosage reduction and early discontinuation of therapy. An increase in the frequency and severity of anaemia was reported in clinical trials for both drugs, and skin disorders including rash and pruritus occurred more frequently with the telaprevir-based regimen. The first-line management of anaemia is ribavirin dose reductions. In cirrhotic patients, aggressive ribavirin dosage reductions, erythropoietin alpha and blood transfusions are effective in managing anaemia. Several deaths and cases of severe infections and hepatic decompensation were reported in cirrhotics treated in real-life setting. Patients with platelet count ≤ 100,000/mm(3) and serum albumin < 35 g/L should not be treated with triple therapy as it is related to a high risk of developing severe complications. The management of rashes, if well planned, does not require telaprevir discontinuation. However, approximately 5% of rashes were severe and a few cases were classified as severe cutaneous adverse reactions leading to treatment discontinuation. Successful treatment can be enhanced by a strong patient support network including a multidisciplinary team.

Optimizing DAA management in daily practice

Despite the incontestable benefits of telaprevir and boceprevir-based triple therapy in patients infected with genotype 1, the practitioner faces a number of new challenges. In daily clinical practice, a checklist approach may facilitate the management of triple therapy. Before initiation, several specific issues should be reviewed with the patient in order to optimize adherence and treatment outcome: potential drug to drug interaction, treatment duration and stopping rules, possible treatment outcomes, side effects, dose and administration with food advice, management of side effects. Because treatment failure is associated with the emergence of resistance-associated variants with reduced sensitivity to protease inhibitors, adherence is of major importance. In this setting, the role of educational nurse should be emphasized for the management of triple therapy in daily clinical practice.

Baseline MELD score predicts hepatic decompensation during antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced cirrhosis

Background and Aims

In patients with advanced liver cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection antiviral therapy with peginterferon and ribavirin is feasible in selected cases only due to potentially life-threatening side effects. However, predictive factors associated with hepatic decompensation during antiviral therapy are poorly defined.

Methods

In a retrospective cohort study, 68 patients with HCV-associated liver cirrhosis (mean MELD score 9.18±2.72) were treated with peginterferon and ribavirin. Clinical events indicating hepatic decompensation (onset of ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, hospitalization) as well as laboratory data were recorded at baseline and during a follow up period of 72 weeks after initiation of antiviral therapy. To monitor long term sequelae of end stage liver disease an extended follow up for HCC development, transplantation and death was applied (240weeks, ±SD 136weeks).

Results

Eighteen patients (26.5%) achieved a sustained virologic response. During the observational period a hepatic decompensation was observed in 36.8%. Patients with hepatic decompensation had higher MELD scores (10.84 vs. 8.23, p<0.001) and higher mean bilirubin levels (26.74 vs. 14.63 µmol/l, p<0.001), as well as lower serum albumin levels (38.2 vs. 41.1 g/l, p = 0.015), mean platelets (102.64 vs. 138.95/nl, p = 0.014) and mean leukocytes (4.02 vs. 5.68/nl, p = 0.002) at baseline as compared to those without decompensation. In the multivariate analysis the MELD score remained independently associated with hepatic decompensation (OR 1.56, 1.18–2.07; p = 0.002). When the patients were grouped according to their baseline MELD scores, hepatic decompensation occurred in 22%, 59%, and 83% of patients with MELD scores of 6–9, 10–13, and >14, respectively. Baseline MELD score was significantly associated with the risk for transplantation/death (p<0.001).

Conclusions

Our data suggest that the baseline MELD score predicts the risk of hepatic decompensation during antiviral therapy and thus contributes to decision making when antiviral therapy is discussed in HCV patients with advanced liver cirrhosis.