Abstract
Severe impairment of the analogue of mental representation is not compensated for by putative language-based cognitive processes in non-dysphasic brain-damaged patients. This undermines the hypothesis of an independent role for language in the generation of thought. Against this view it may be contended that there seems to be no obvious way in which analogical mental representation can decide between alternative syntactical structures available for the expression of thought. We performed a visual imagery experiment in which we asked 40 subjects to imagine visual scenes representing the meanings of simple utterances presented to them. The subjects then had to indicate the relative position, in each visual image, of two objects mentioned in each utterance. Series of utterances were presented differing syntactically (active or passive phrase) and semantically (specifying in different ways the spatial and temporal relations between the objects mentioned). The results of this mental imagery experiment indirectly support the hypothesis that syntactical structures can be represented in a nonlinguistic analogue medium.
Collapse