Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention

Reoperation for a Starr-Edwards aortic prosthetic valve 33 years after initial implantation

A 40-year-old woman admitted with heart failure had undergone aortic valve replacement with a Model 2310 Starr-Edwards valve due to aortic regurgitation 33 years previously. She had been followed up for several years, but discontinued follow-up and medication (including Warfarin) for the past 25 years. Echocardiography demonstrated marked dilatation and thickening of the left ventricle, and the peak pressure gradient of the prosthesis was measured as 87.9 mmHg. Under the diagnosis of chronic aortic valve prosthesis-patient mismatch with subsequent severe left ventricular dysfunction, the Starr-Edwards valve was explanted and replaced with a 23 mm St. Jude Medical prosthetic valve. The removed valve showed minimal cloth wear except for a small part of the strut. The postoperative echocardiography demonstrated recovering of left ventricular function. To our best knowledge, this case presents the longest duration for a surgically explanted Starr-Edwards aortic prosthetic valve in Japan.

Comparison of transprosthetic mean pressure gradients between Medtronic Hall and ATS valves in the aortic position

AIM OF THE STUDY

Several studies have shown the inferior performance of small prostheses in the narrow aortic root. However, modern low-profile mechanical prostheses have improved hemodynamic performance characteristics. By measuring the transprosthetic pressure gradient in vivo, we were able to characterize the hemodynamic features of two prostheses: the ATS Medical (ATS) and the Medtronic Hall (MH) valves.

METHODS

From October 1994 to April 2002, 113 patients received an aortic valve replacement (AVR) with either an ATS or a MH valve. The transprosthetic pressure gradients, calculated from a simplified Bernoulli equation during immediate postoperative Doppler echocardiographic examination, were compared for differently sized prostheses with respect to body surface area (BSA).

RESULTS

The mean pressure gradients and the mean BSAs were: 27.8 +/- 14.8 mm Hg and 1.50 +/- 0.10 m(2) in ATS 19 mm (n = 7), 20.4 +/- 8.5 mm Hg and 1.54 +/- 0.11 m(2) in ATS 21 mm (n = 22), 13.0 +/- 5.7 mm Hg, 1.70 +/- 0.13 m(2) in ATS 23 mm (n = 22), 10.9 +/- 3.5 mm Hg and 1.81 +/ -0.16 m(2) in ATS 25 mm (n = 19), 9.3 +/- 0.6 mm Hg and 1.72 +/- 0.17 m(2) in ATS 27 mm (n = 4), 13.5 +/- 6.5 mm Hg and 1.54 +/- 0.13 m(2) in MH 20 mm (n = 9), 10.9 +/- 4.7 mm Hg and 1.64 +/- 0.15 m(2) in MH 22 mm (n = 22), 9.3 +/- 3.1 mm Hg and 1.72 +/- 0.12 m(2) in MH 24 mm (n = 7).

CONCLUSIONS

With the exception of the ATS 19-mm valve, the variously sized prostheses have acceptable transprosthetic pressure gradient measurements. In addition, even-sized MH valves (20 and 22 mm) with a thinner sewing cuff showed better hemodynamic performances than similarly sized ATS valves.

Impact of Valve Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Left Ventricular Mass Regression Following Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

Valve prosthesis-patient mismatch is a frequent problem in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement and its main hemodynamic consequence is to generate high transvalvular gradients through normally functioning prosthetic valves. The persistence of high gradients may hinder or delay the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement.

METHODS

The aim of the study was to determine the impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on the postoperative regression of left ventricular mass. Left ventricular mass was measured by Doppler echocardiography in 109 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with a single type of bioprosthesis (Carpentier-Edwards Perimount) for pure aortic stenosis. Prosthesis-patient mismatch was defined as a projected indexed effective orifice area less than 0.90 cm2/m2. On this basis, 58/109 (53.2%) patients had prosthesis-patient mismatch.

RESULTS

There was a good correlation (r = 0.61, p < 0.001) between the postoperative mean transprosthetic gradient and the projected indexed effective orifice area. The absolute and relative left ventricular mass regression was significantly (p = 0.002 and p = 0.01, respectively) lower in patients with prosthesis-patient mismatch (-48 +/- 47 g, -17% +/- 16%) compared to those with no prosthesis-patient mismatch (-77 +/- 49 g, -24% +/- 14%). In multivariate analysis, a larger projected indexed effective orifice area, female gender and a higher preoperative left ventricular mass are independent predictors of greater left ventricular mass regression.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that in patients with pure aortic stenosis prosthesis-patient mismatch is associated with lesser regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. These findings may have important clinical implications given that prosthesis-patient mismatch is frequent in these patients.

Hemodynamic and clinical outcomes with the biocor valve in the aortic position: an 8-year experience

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze the 8-year experience, survival, prosthetic complications, and hemodynamics of patients who received the Biocor valve, a new-generation tissue valve, in the aortic position.

METHODS

From May 1992 through May 2001, 257 consecutive patients (129 women and 128 men; mean age, 75 +/- 6 years; age range, 45-91 years) received 258 aortic Biocor porcine prostheses. One female patient who received 2 Biocor valves in the aortic position during 2 consecutive operations was entered twice in the statistical analysis. Twelve (4.6%) patients had previous aortic valve operations. Preoperatively, 82 (32%) patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. Associated surgical procedures included coronary artery bypass grafting in 56 (21.7%) patients, aortic annular enlargement or aortoplasty in 20 (8%) patients, and others in 8 (3%) patients. Echocardiography was performed in the majority of long-term survivors (91.6%). Follow-up included 1215 patient-years and was 100% complete, with a median time of 5 patient-years (range, 0.4-10.5 years).

RESULTS

There were 16 (6.2%) early deaths. According to a univariate analysis, New York Heart Association functional class III or IV, concomitant procedures, ejection fractions of less than 40%, and urgent operations were identified as significant perioperative risk factors. At follow-up, 75 patients died; 8-year actuarial Kaplan-Meier survival was 48% +/- 5%. At 8 years, the actuarial freedom from valve-related death was 92% +/- 2.6%, the freedom from thromboembolism was 93% +/- 2%, the freedom from anticoagulant-related hemorrhage was 95% +/- 2%, the freedom from endocarditis was 99% +/- 0.6%, the freedom from paravalvular leak was 96% +/- 1.5%, the freedom from all valve-related complications was 78% +/- 4.5%, and the freedom from structural valve deterioration was 95% +/- 3.7%. At 8 years, the actuarial freedom from structural valve deterioration was 89% +/- 10% and 95.8% +/- 4% in patients younger and older than 65 years, respectively. At 10 years, in patients older than 65 years, the actual freedom from structural valve deterioration was 97.9% +/- 2.1%, and the freedom from reoperation was 97% +/- 1.3%. New York Heart Association status was I or II in 90% of patients at the end of follow-up. The mean echocardiographic follow-up time was 4.6 +/- 2 years. By using Doppler echocardiography, the peak and mean transprosthetic gradients were determined to be 30.8 +/- 9.3 mm Hg and 16.6 +/- 5.3 mm Hg, respectively. Mean mass/volume ratio and left ventricular end-diastolic volume were 1.37 +/- 0.17 g/mL and 63.4 +/- 22.6 mL/m(2), respectively. The majority of patients showed a persistent left ventricular hypertrophy.

CONCLUSION

The Biocor is an effective bioprosthesis with a low incidence of valve-related complications comparable with that of other second-generation bioprostheses. This stented porcine prosthesis provides satisfactory results in terms of hemodynamics, valve durability, and freedom from reoperation.

Role of transvalvular gradient in outcome from valve replacement for aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND

Despite limitations the transvalvular gradient (TVG) still is commonly used in aortic stenosis when patients are referred for aortic valve replacement. We wished to ascertain if it had a role in predicting outcome from valve replacement rather than as an indicator of severity, specifically investigating if the TVG affected renal dysfunction, hospital stay, and medium-term survival after valve replacement.

METHODS

Six hundred and twenty-three consecutive patients who had aortic valve replacement were identified and 211 of these patients were isolated as first time replacement for aortic stenosis that formed the final study group, and were followed up for up to 48 months. Variables significant (p < 0.05) on univariate analysis were included in the logistic regression multivariate analysis (renal dysfunction, prolonged hospital stay) or Cox proportional hazard regression model (medium-term mortality).

RESULTS

A significant association was present between TVG and age (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated angina greater than or equal to grade 3 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS 3; p = 0.014) and having nonelective surgery (p < 0.001) to be independent predictors of renal dysfunction. Angina greater than or equal to CCS 3 (p = 0.013) was the only independent predictor of prolonged hospital stay. Independent predictors of medium-term mortality on multivariate analysis were age (p = 0.043) and having a size 19 valve prosthesis (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

The TVG is inadequate as an independent predictor of the degree of aortic stenosis and outcome from aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis. In contrast, the TVG may be a useful screening tool for detecting aortic stenosis in targeted elderly populations.

Patient‐Prosthesis Mismatch After Small‐Size Stentless Aortic Valve Replacement

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of patient-prosthesis mismatch (P-PM) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a small-size Cryolife O'Brien (CLOB) bioprosthesis and to evaluate its clinical and hemodynamic implications.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients (mean age 70.9 +/- 5.2 years, 77.8% females), receiving a labeled 21-23 mm CLOB between 1993 and 2000, were retrospectively studied. Effective orifice area (EOA) was calculated by the continuity equation and then indexed to the patient's body surface area (BSA) to obtain the indexed EOA (EOAI). Based on previous observations a mismatch was defined as EOAI <or= 0.85 cm2/m2.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (20%) at discharge, two (3.3%) at 6 months and none at late controls had an EOAI <or= 0.85 cm2/m2. At ANOVA determinants of mismatch were female sex (p < 0.001), age (p = 0.01), and patient's annulus index (PAI, p < 0.001). Patients with mismatch had higher mean gradients (MG, p = 0.01, and p < 0.001 at discharge and 6 months, respectively) and EOAI correlated with MG at discharge (r2= 0.72, p < 0.001) and 6-month (r2= 0.40, p = 0.001) studies. At 1 year no difference in MG was detected between patients with or without mismatch (p = ns) and EOAI did not correlate with MG (r2= 0.01, p = ns). Midwall fractional shortening did not differ in patients with or without mismatch (p = ns). Patients with an EOAI >or= 0.8 cm/m2 showed an earlier concentric remodeling up to 1 year; no difference was demonstrated at later studies between groups. Survival and clinical status results were not affected by an EOAI <or= 0.85 cm2/m2.

CONCLUSIONS

After AVR with CLOB mismatch occurred early postoperatively in a small number of patients without clinical repercussions. EOAI, significantly increasing over time, was adequate to BSA in all patients at late controls.

Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves

BACKGROUND

We examined factors associated with persistent or recurrent congestive heart failure after aortic valve replacement.

METHODS

Patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with contemporary prostheses (n = 1563) were followed up with annual clinical assessment and echocardiography. The effect of demographic, comorbid, and valve-related variables on the composite outcome of New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms or congestive heart failure death after surgery was evaluated with stratified log-rank tests, Cox proportional hazard models, and logistic regression. Factors associated with all-cause death were also examined. Prediction models were bootstrapped 1000 times.

RESULTS

Total follow-up was 6768 patient-years (mean, 4.3 +/- 3.3 years; range, 60 days to 17.1 years). Freedom from congestive heart failure or congestive heart failure death was 98.6% +/- 0.3%, 88.6% +/- 1.0%, 73.9% +/- 2.3%, and 45.2% +/- 8.5% at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Age, preoperative New York Heart Association class, left ventricular grade, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, smoking, and redo status predicted congestive heart failure after surgery (all P <.05). Larger prosthesis size and effective orifice area, both absolute and indexed for body surface area, were independently associated with freedom from congestive heart failure. Increased transprosthesis gradients were predicted by prosthesis-patient mismatch and were associated with congestive heart failure after surgery. Mismatch defined as an effective orifice area/body surface area of 0.80 cm(2)/m(2) or less was a significant predictor of congestive heart failure events after surgery, but mismatch defined as an effective orifice area/body surface area of 0.85 cm(2)/m(2) or less was not. Small prosthesis size and mismatch were not significantly associated with all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

These analyses identify independent predictors of congestive heart failure symptoms and congestive heart failure death late after aortic valve replacement and indicate that prosthesis size has a significant effect on this cardiac end point, but not on overall survival after aortic valve replacement.

Are mechanical valves with enhanced inner diameter advantageous in the small sized aortic annulus?

BACKGROUND

Mechanical bileaflet valves with enhanced inner diameter may offer superior hemodynamic properties in patients with a small aortic annulus. The aim of this clinical study was to compare these valves with standard bileaflet prostheses in vivo.

METHODS

Mechanical aortic valve replacement for combined stenosis and regurgitation was performed in 47 patients with standard CarboMedics prostheses (CM: 21 mm, 23 mm, 25 mm) and two types of diameter enhanced St. Jude Medical prostheses (SJM-AHPJ: 21 mm, 23 mm, 25 mm; SJM-Regent: 21 mm, 23 mm). Transvalvular mean gradients (TVG) were assessed intraoperatively by means of transesophageal echocardiography (TVG(TEE)) and simultaneous direct pressure monitoring of the left ventricle and the ascending aorta (TVG(CATH)), as well as early (3 months) and late (9 months) postoperatively by means of transthoracic echocardiography (TVG(TTE)). Left ventricular muscle mass was assessed preoperatively, early, and late postoperatively to evaluate remodeling capacity.

RESULTS

In all valve types and sizes, both TVG assessments exhibited consistent findings. Small-sized conventional valves of 21 mm showed a marked initial TVG. In contrast, both valve types with enhanced inner diameter exhibited significantly lower TVG comparable with those achieved with larger valves (TVG(CATH) CM 21 mm, 15.6 +/- 3.9 mm Hg; SJM-AHPJ 21 mm, 11.9 +/- 1.6 mm Hg; SJM-Regent 21 mm, 9.9 +/- 1.1 mm Hg; CM 23 mm, 7.8 +/- 0.8 mm Hg; SJM-AHPJ 23 mm, 7.7 +/- 1.4 mm Hg; SJM-Regent 23 mm, 9.5 +/- 1.8 mm Hg). During the postoperative course TVG remained constant in all valve types and sizes. Left ventricular muscle mass, however, diminished markedly in all valves without exhibiting significant differences between size matched valve types.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a small aortic annulus, who require a 21-mm valve, diameter-enhanced prostheses provide lower transvalvular gradients than conventional valves. However, in the intermediate clinical course, appropriate left ventricular remodeling occurred in all patients independent of the size and the type of the valve.

Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to quantify the relationship between prosthesis size adjusted for patient size (prosthesis-patient size) and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement.

METHODS

Data from nine representative sources on 13,258 aortic valve replacements provided 69,780 patient-years of follow-up (mean 5.3 +/- 4.7 years), with reliable survival estimates to 15 years. Prostheses included 5757 stented porcine xenografts, 3198 stented bovine pericardial xenografts, 3583 mechanical valves, and 720 allografts. Manufacturers' labeled prosthesis size was 19 mm or smaller in 1109 patients. Expressions of prosthesis-patient size assessed were indexed internal prosthesis orifice area (in centimeters squared per square meter of body surface area) and standardized internal prosthesis orifice size (Z, the number of SDs from mean normal native aortic valve size). Multivariable hazard domain analysis with balancing score and risk factor adjustment quantified the association of prosthesis-patient size with survival.

RESULTS

Prosthesis-patient size down to at least 1.1 cm(2)/m(2) or -3 Z did not adversely affect intermediate- or long-term survival (P >.2). However, 30-day mortality increased 1% to 2% when indexed orifice area fell below 1.2 cm(2)/m(2) (P =.002) or standardized orifice size fell below -2.5 Z (P =.0003). The increased early risk affected fewer than 1% of patients receiving bioprostheses but about 25% of those receiving mechanical devices.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic prosthesis-patient size down to 1.1 cm(2)/m(2) or -3 Z did not reduce intermediate- or long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. However, patient-prosthesis size under 1.2 cm(2)/m(2) or -2.5 Z was associated with a 1% to 2% increase in 30-day mortality. Prosthesis-patient sizes this small or smaller were rarely implanted in patients receiving bioprostheses.

Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

The prosthesis used for aortic valve replacement (AVR) can be too small in relation to body size, thus causing valve prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) and abnormally high transvalvular pressure gradients. This study examined if there is a relation between PPM and short-term mortality after operation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The indexed valve effective orifice area (EOA) was estimated for each type and size of prosthesis being implanted in 1266 consecutive patients and used to define PPM as not clinically significant if >0.85 cm2/m2, as moderate if >0.65 cm2/m2 and <or=0.85 cm2/m2, and as severe if <or=0.65 cm2/m2; it was correlated with 30-day mortality and compared with other relevant variables. Moderate or severe PPM was present in 38% of patients. Thirty-day mortality was 4.6% (58/1266 patients) and the strongest independent predictors in multivariate analysis were left ventricular ejection fraction <40% (P=0.007), infectious endocarditis (P=0.002), emergent/salvage operation (P=0.002), cardiopulmonary bypass time >120 minutes (P=0.001), and PPM (P=0.003). Relative risk of mortality was increased 2.1-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 3.7) in patients with moderate PPM and 11.4-fold (4.4 to 29.5) in those with severe PPM. Moreover, risk of mortality for every category of PPM was higher in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction <40% as compared with >or=40% (nonsignificant PPM, 2.7 versus 1.0; moderate PPM, 7.1 versus 1.8; severe PPM, 77.1 versus 11.3).

CONCLUSIONS

PPM is a strong and independent predictor of short-term mortality among patients undergoing AVR, and its impact is related both to its degree of severity and the status of left ventricular function. In contrast to other risk factors, moderate-severe PPM can be largely avoided with the use of a prospective strategy at the time of operation.

Serial Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of small-sized sorin bicarbon prostheses

OBJECTIVE

The Sorin Bicarbon prosthesis (Sorin Biomedica, Saluggia, Italy) is a bileaflet valve with curved-profile leaflets, a rolling hinge mechanism, and a pyrolytic carbon-coated titanium alloy housing and sewing ring. Although the Sorin Bicarbon prosthesis has been implanted in greater than 80,000 patients, and reference values on the hemodynamic performance of valve prostheses are needed to avoid patient-prosthesis mismatch, few Doppler echocardiographic data are available on the prosthesis in the aortic position. The aim of this study is to provide a detailed echocardiographic evaluation of the hemodynamic performance and regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Bicarbon prosthesis.

METHODS

The study included 182 patients who received a 21-mm (n = 61) or 23-mm (n = 121) Sorin Bicarbon prosthesis for pure or prevalent aortic stenosis who underwent serial echocardiograms at 3, 6, and 12 months after aortic valve replacement.

RESULTS

Mean and peak gradients significantly decreased (P <.001) during follow-up to values of 12 +/- 3 and 22 +/- 6 mm Hg for the 21-mm prosthesis and values of 11 +/- 4 and 19 +/- 6 mm Hg for the 23-mm prosthesis at 1 year. Left ventricular mass index showed a 17% decrease to 120 +/- 27 g/m(2) in recipients of the 21-mm prosthesis (P <.001) and a 21% decrease to 123 +/- 29 g/m(2) in recipients of the 23-mm prosthesis (P <.001). A larger prosthesis size was the only predictor of a higher left ventricular mass index regression. Among recipients of the 21-mm prosthesis, body surface area of greater than 1.85 m(2) was associated with a lower regression of left ventricular mass index. The effective orifice area index was 1.00 +/- 0.11 and 1.08 +/- 0.14 cm(2)/m(2) in recipients of the 21-mm and 23-mm prostheses, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Size 21 mm and 23 mm Sorin Bicarbon prostheses show low transprosthetic gradients, with significant reduction of left ventricular mass index during the first postoperative year. The reported effective orifice areas might be useful for aortic valve replacement in patients with a small aortic annulus to avoid patient-prosthesis mismatch.

Choice of prosthetic heart valve for adult patients

This review summarizes the major long-term (> or =10 to 15 years) patient outcomes after insertion of many Food and Drug Administration approved prosthetic heart valves (PHV). Mechanical PHV was associated with a better survival (p < 0.02) at 15 years after aortic valve replacement (AVR) than with a bioprosthesis in the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) trial. In both the DVA and the Edinburgh Heart Valve trials, bioprosthesis were associated with structural valve deterioration (SVD) (mitral valve replacement [MVR] > AVR) and, therefore, for replacement of the PHV. Thromboembolism and bleeding rate were higher with mechanical PHV. Mortality after AVR and MVR is high at 10 to 15 years because of the associated comorbid conditions and older age of patients. Outcomes with "new" good valves are similar to that with "older" good valves. Complication rates of thromboembolism, bleeding, endocarditis, and leak vary widely; the rates of these complications are not different among different mechanical PHV and among different bioprosthetic PHV. Structural valve deterioration is rare with mechanical PHV. Structural valve deterioration of bioprosthesis after MVR is higher than after AVR; after AVR, homografts and bioprosthesis have similar rates of SVD. The exact rate of SVD of the pulmonary autograft is uncertain. Valve prosthesis-patient mismatch is clinically important when it is severe and in selected patients when it is moderate. Bioprosthesis have a low rate of SVD in the older patient and, thus, are the PHV of choice for AVR in patients > or =60 to 65 years of age and for MVR in patients > or =65 to 70 years of age; in younger patients mechanical valves are the PHV of choice. In individual patients there may be exceptions to these general rules.

Does gender affect outcome of cardiac surgery in octogenarians?

The long-term results of cardiac surgery in 212 consecutive octogenarians (116 men, 96 women) were reviewed retrospectively. Preoperative functional status, Euroscore, and the incidences of hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were similar in both sexes. Women had more diabetes mellitus (45% versus 25%; p < 0.05) but less renal dysfunction (16% versus 29%; p < 0.05). Men required emergency procedures more frequently (p < 0.05). Women underwent complete revascularization more often and had more arterial grafts. Hospital mortality was similar (11.5% in women versus 12.9% in men), but women had more complications (76% versus 64%), longer convalescence (24.3 versus 18.5 days), fewer psychiatric disorders (14% versus 23%) and less heart block (9% versus 19%). Men had a slightly better outcome in terms of functional class and Euroqol score during follow-up of up to 114 months. Median survival was longer in women (3.15 versus 2.96 years) but 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates and late deaths were similar. Outcomes appear to be equitable for both sexes among octogenarians.

Quantification of haemodynamic performance of stented and stentless aortic bioprostheses and potential influence on survival

BACKGROUND

The goal of aortic valve replacement is relief of symptoms, optimisation of haemodynamics, regression of left ventricular mass and advancement of survival. The objective of this review article is to provide the evidence-to-date on the clinical performance of stented and stentless heterograft bioprostheses with regard to haemodynamics, durability and survival.

METHODS

The haemodynamic advantage of aortic valve replacement prostheses is judged on ability to minimise postoperative gradients and to optimise the normalisation of left ventricular mass and function. The most frequent cause of high postoperative gradients occurs when the effective prosthetic valve area is less than that of the normal human valve. The effective orifice area index (EOAI) of >/= 0.85 cm(2)/m(2) is considered optimal to prevent patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) at rest and exercise.

RESULTS

The stented bioprostheses contribute to obstructive non-physiological flow patterns whereas stentless bioprostheses provide laminar non-obstructive flow. The stentless bioprostheses have been shown to have larger effective orifice areas and lower gradients. Mismatch is decreased with stentless bioprostheses especially when prosthesis size is </=21 mm. Left ventricular mass (LVM) postoperatively has been shown to relate to baseline LVM index (LVMI) and PPM. The EOAI >0.8 cm(2)/m(2) provides the best long-term regression of LVM. It has been identified that a tendency for PPM in sizes 21 and 23 mm stented bioprostheses did not prevent adequate achievement of appropriate LVMI. Survival at 5 years favoured stentless over stented bioprostheses for patients <70 years, but not in patients >/= _70 years of age. The durability comparison of the stentless bioprostheses must wait until 10-15 years experience is achieved. There is preliminary evidence that uneven shear stress on the leaflet of a regurgitant stentless bioprosthesis can accelerate leaflet tears at the level of the commissures. Dilation of the aortic root and, particularly, the sinotubular junction, can cause progressive stentless valve insufficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term performance advantages or disadvantages of stentless bioprostheses compared to stented bioprostheses will require at least another 5-7 years of cumulative stentless bioprostheses experience. Surgeons can use an algorithm intraoperatively to prevent patient-prosthesis mismatch while choosing the optimal prosthesis.

Clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of small Perimount aortic valves in patients aged 75 years or older

BACKGROUND

There is the potential for iatrogenic aortic stenosis and poor quality of life when small aortic valve bioprostheses are used in elderly patients. The alternative is enlarging the aortic annulus to accommodate larger size prostheses, increasing operative mortality. It was hoped that bovine pericardial valves would improve hemodynamic performance in the smaller valve sizes.

METHODS

To determine long-term results and in vivo hemodynamic performance of small-size aortic Carpentier-Edwards bovine pericardial valves (Perimount) in elderly patients, we analyzed our follow-up and echocardiographic data from patients 75 years of age or older receiving isolated 19-mm and 21-mm Perimount valves. Ninety-four patients with a mean age of 77 +/- 2.2 years were followed for 12 years. Seventeen patients with 19-mm and 25 patients with 21-mm Perimount valves underwent transthoracic echocardiograms.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 6.3% (6 of 94). Twelve-year survival was 82.7%. Freedom from thromboembolism was 86.9% at 12 years. Two patients had anticoagulation-related bleeding. Overall New York Heart Association class decreased from 3 +/- 1 to 1.6 +/- 0.7 at the end of follow-up. Hemodynamic performances were satisfactory in both 19-mm and 21-mm Perimount valves, with low peak and mean transvalvular gradients and good effective orifice areas, orifice area indices, and performance indices.

CONCLUSIONS

Perimount aortic valve in the small aortic annulus has yielded excellent long-term results and hemodynamic performances. Perimount is a very satisfactory option in elderly patients. Implantation of a Perimount bioprosthesis avoids enlargement of the small aortic annulus, reducing mortality and morbidity associated with this procedure.

Hemodynamics and early clinical performance of the St. Jude Medical Regent mechanical aortic valve

BACKGROUND

The St. Jude Medical Regent valve is the next-generation bileaflet aortic prosthesis, modified from the currently marketed St. Jude Medical mechanical valve to achieve a larger geometric orifice without changing the existing design of the pivot mechanism or blood-contact surface areas. The present study reports the hemodynamic and early clinical results of an ongoing multicenter trial investigating the performance of the Regent valve.

METHODS

Between July 1998 and July 2001, 361 patients at 17 centers in North America and Europe underwent implantation of a Regent mechanical aortic valve prosthesis. Clinical status was prospectively recorded, and echocardiography with Doppler was performed at discharge and at 2 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after operation.

RESULTS

Follow-up to date is 300 patient-years (average, 0.8 +/- 0.7 years per patient; range, 0.0 to 2.7 years). There were low rates of clinical adverse events. Mean gradient at 6 months was 9.7 +/- 5.3 mm Hg, 7.6 +/- 5.2 mm Hg, 6.3 +/- 3.7 mm Hg, 5.8 +/- 3.4 mm Hg, and 4.0 +/- 2.6 mm Hg, respectively, for 19-mm, 21-mm, 23-mm, 25-mm, and 27-mm valves; effective orifice area was 1.6 +/- 0.4 cm2, 2.0 +/- 0.7 cm2, 2.2 +/- 0.9 cm2, 2.5 +/- 0.9 cm2, and 3.6 +/- 1.3 cm2, respectively. Indexed effective orifice area was equal to or greater than 1.0 cm2/m2 for all valve sizes. Left ventricular mass index decreased significantly between early postoperative (165.9 +/- 57.1 g/m2) and 6-month follow-up (137.9 +/- 41.0 g/m2; delta = -28.0 +/- 49.1 g/m2; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The St. Jude Medical Regent aortic valve has excellent hemodynamics and early clinical results, with rapid and significant left ventricular mass regression. Long-term clinical assessment is ongoing.

Nineteen-millimeter prosthetic aortic valves allow normalization of left ventricular mass in elderly women

BACKGROUND

Implantation of small aortic valve prostheses has been reported to be associated with impaired left ventricular (LV) mass regression and incomplete resolution of symptoms although these data have been generated largely with male patients. Therefore we sought to determine the clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of female patients who received a 19-mm aortic valve.

METHODS

Between May 1995 and December 2000, 38 female patients (average age 73 years, range 42 to 89) underwent isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR; n = 22) or AVR plus coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG; n = 16) with a 19-mm aortic prosthesis. The average New York Heart Association (NYHA) class was 3.08 and of the 26 patients who had angina, 47.2% were in CCS class III or IV. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was done an average of 33.4 months (8 to 72) after surgery.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 10.5%. Overall survival at an average of 33 months was 71.1%. The average NYHA class was 1.52 +/- 0.34 postoperatively (p < 0.001 versus preoperative) and 95% had no anginal symptoms or were in Canadian Cardiovascular Society class I. The LV mass index showed significant regression (114 +/- 11 g/m2 to 89 +/- 9 g/m2, p = 0.001) despite an effective orifice area index (EOAI) of 0.64 +/- 0.09 cm2/m2.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a very small EOAI, elderly female patients with 19-mm prosthetic aortic valves can experience a satisfactory improvement in symptoms and normalization of LV mass. This finding suggests that small prosthetic aortic valves continue to have an application in contemporary cardiac surgical practice. The current perception of patient-prosthesis mismatch may need to be reconsidered for select populations.

A comparison of the in vivo performance of the 19-mm St. Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus and 21-mm standard valve

BACKGROUND

In the present study we analyzed the in vivo performance of the 19-mm St. Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus aortic prosthesis (19HP), evaluated the midterm performance of 19HP in the aortic position, and compared the implantability and hemodynamic characteristics of this valve with those of the 21-mm standard St. Jude Medical valve (21SD) in adult patients with aortic stenosis and a narrowed aortic annulus.

METHODS

From February 1994 to December 1999, 60 patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement with either the 19HP (n = 31) or the 21SD (n = 29) were studied. Comparison between the two models included analysis of early and late mortality and morbidity. Pre- and postoperative echocardiography was performed in all patients to evaluate and compare the hemodynamic performance of both prosthetic valves. The postoperative serum lactic dehydrogenase activity was measured in both groups of patients as an indicator of hemolysis.

RESULTS

The mean body surface area was 1.46 +/- 0.16 m2 in the 19HP group and 1.49 +/- 0.13 m2 in the 21SD group (p = 0.1577). Other than female dominance in the 19HP group, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of preoperative variables (age, preoperative pressure gradients, and New York Heart Association functional class). The average postoperative peak pressure gradient was 23.3 +/- 10.5 mm Hg in the 19HP group and 27.9 +/- 9.9 mm Hg in the 21SD group (p = 0.0666). There was no hospital death in either group. Six-year follow-up was completed in both groups of patients. Late death occurred in 1 patient in the 19HP group (1.09% per patient-year). Actuarial survival at 6 years was 92.3% +/- 7.4% in the 19HP group, and 100% in the 21SD group (p = 0.33). The linearized complication rate was 1.09% per patient-year and 1.02% per patient-year for thromboembolism, and 1.09% per patient-year and 1.02% per patient-year for anticoagulant-related hemorrhage in the 19HP group and the 21SD group, respectively. Freedom from all complications at 6 years did not show any significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.54). Although left ventricular mass indices decreased significantly after aortic valve replacement in both groups (19HP group, p = 0.0002; 21SD group, p = 0.0006), there were no significant differences in the two indices between the groups after aortic valve replacement (p = 0.999). There was no significant difference in the lactic dehydrogenase level between the two groups (p = 0.4915).

CONCLUSIONS

In vivo hemodynamic performance of the 19HP valve as well as the early and intermediate clinical outcome up to 6 years was satisfactory and corresponded closely to that of the 21SD valve in adult patients. The 19-mm Hemodynamic Plus model can be recommended in patients with a measured 19-mm annulus and this valve will minimize the need for the aortic annular enlargement procedure.

Routine enlargement of the small aortic root: a preventive strategy to minimize mismatch

BACKGROUND

We routinely use aortic root enlargement (ARE) as part of one strategy to avoid prosthesis-patient mismatch in patients with relatively small aortic roots who are undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 657 consecutive stented AVR patients at a single institution between 1995 to 2001. Of these, 114 (17%) patients underwent ARE. Root enlargement was selectively performed in patients at risk for prosthesis-patient mismatch, defined as calculated projected indexed effective orifice area (iEOA) less than 0.85 cm2/m2. This involved extension of the aortotomy between the left and noncoronary cusps, valve implantation, and Dacron patch closure of the aorta, thus permitting replacement with a valve size appropriate to body surface area.

RESULTS

The mean age of ARE patients was 72.5 +/- 11.0 years, with 32% aged 80 years or more. Of the patients, 61% were female and 27% had undergone previous cardiac operations. Combined procedures included coronary bypass in 57 patients and mitral repair or replacement in 24. The prevalence of mismatch was less than 3%. The ARE required an average of 19 minutes of additional aortic clamp time. The 30-day mortality was 0.9%. Logistic regression showed perfusion time to be the only independent predictor of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that ARE can be performed readily and with minimal added risk relative to standard AVR. We also present a preventive strategy to minimize mismatch predicted at time of operation from the reference value of effective orifice area for a given prosthesis and the patient's size. This includes use of ARE to enhance the potential benefit of AVR.

Regression of left ventricular mass one year after aortic valve replacement for pure severe aortic stenosis

The aim of the study was to quantify a 1-year change in left ventricular (LV) mass index (MI) and systolic LV function in 30 patients with pure severe aortic stenosis by means of serial 3-dimensional (3-D) echocardiography. To assess the completeness of LVMI regression after 1 year, we compared the postoperative mass of patients with mass values of 30 normotensive control subjects without a history of cardiac disease. Ejection fraction increased from 64 +/- 14% before surgery to 69 +/- 8% at follow-up (p = 0.067), and functional class improved from 2.9 +/- 0.5 to 1.4 +/- 0.5 (p <0.05), with improvement in each patient. During the same period, LVMI regressed by 23.4% (p <0.001). Postoperative LVMI was related to preoperative LVMI (r = 0.82; p <0.001) and baseline ejection fraction (r = -0.5; p = 0.009). LVMI regressed into the normal range in 64% of patients at follow-up. Patients achieving normal mass values did not differ with respect to patient gender, valve type, or valve size. Patients with reduced preoperative LV function had larger volumes (p <0.01), larger mass values (p <0.01), and a trend toward more mass regression (p = 0.062) than patients with normal preoperative function. Although ejection fraction improved after 1 year in all of these patients (p <0.03), they were less likely to achieve normal mass values at follow-up (p = 0.01). Regression of LVMI in patients with pure aortic stenosis is a positive event that occurs in each patient and that is associated with improvement in functional status. LVMI regressed into the normal range in most patients with normal preoperative function. Preoperative LV function, but not patient gender, valve type, or size, was related to normalization of LVMI at follow-up in this selected study population.

[Prosthetic valve thrombosis: which is the most appropriate initial therapy?]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate what is the best initial therapy for patients with obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis.

METHODS

Data from 47 patients diagnosed with prosthetic valve thrombosis in two tertiary hospitals during an 8-years period were analyzed.

RESULTS

The involved prostheses were in mitral position in 34 cases (2 biological valves), in aortic position in 12, and in double mitral and aortic position in one. The thrombosis was not obstructive in 12 patients. In the remaining 35 patients, the prosthetic obstruction was treated by heparin (n = 2), thrombolysis (n = 19), or direct surgery (n = 14). There was no mortality in the thrombolytic group, although 6 patients needed surgery before discharge because of an abnormal prosthetic residual gradient (n = 5) or a persisting abnormal disc valve motion (n = 1). Five out of 14 patients of direct surgery died, 2 before the planned operation could be performed. Thus, mortality rate, in an intention to treat analysis, was very favourable to thrombolytic therapy (p = 0.008); and this, despite the higher index of clinical severity (on a scale from 0 to 4) was superior in this group of thrombolyzed patients: 3.3 0.6 vs. 2.1 0.9 in those who underwent surgery; p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of mortality rate, thrombolysis is a better alternative than direct surgery to fight against obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis. Even if the result is suboptimal, it allows the performance of surgery in better clinical conditions and, thus, with minor risk.

Time course of left ventricular remodeling after stentless aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Stentless aortic valves are associated with a significant decrease in left ventricular hypertrophy. This study examined the time course and factors affecting left ventricular mass regression (LVMR) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with Cryolife O'Brien (CLOB) (Cryolife International, Atlanta, Ga) stentless valves.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2000, 130 consecutive patients underwent AVR with CLOB. Mean age was 71.3 +/- 6.3 years. Sixty-four (49.2%) were male. Mean body surface area (BSA) was 1.7 +/- 0.2 m(2). Mean valve size implanted was 23.6 +/- 2.0 mm. All patients were monitored with serial echocardiograms; the first study was performed preoperatively, and subsequent controls were at 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 years, respectively. Left ventricular mass was calculated by the Devereux formula and indexed by BSA.

RESULTS

Analysis of variance showed a significant reduction in the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) over time (P < .001). Most LVMRs occurred within the first 6 months, and after 1 year LVMI had decreased by 37.5% with further, but not statistically significant, reductions at later examinations. We found that baseline BSA > 1.75 m(2), male sex, arterial blood pressure > or = 150 mm Hg, left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 35%, New York Heart Association functional class > or = III, non-sinus rhythm, and prevalent aortic incompetence to be factors influencing LVMR. LVMR was not related to postoperative effective orifice area < or = 0.85 cm/m(2) and prosthetic size.

CONCLUSIONS

AVR with a CLOB valve is followed by a significant LVMR that occurs soon after surgery. It is influenced by several patient-related factors: most of them can be predicted preoperatively.

Hemodynamic performance of the 21-mm Sorin Bicarbon mechanical aortic prostheses using dobutamine Doppler echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Small-sized mechanical aortic prostheses are commonly associated with generation of high transvalvular gradients, particularly in patients with large body surface area, and can result in patient-prosthesis mismatch. This study evaluates the hemodynamic performance of 21-mm Sorin Bicarbon bileaflet mechanical prostheses using dobutamine stress echocardiography.

METHODS

Fourteen patients (7 women; mean age, 63+/-8 years) who had undergone aortic valve replacement with a 21-mm Sorin Bicarbon bileaflet mechanical prosthesis 32.4+/-5.1 months previously were studied. After a resting Doppler echocardiogram, a dobutamine infusion was started at a rate of 5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) and increased to 30 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) at 15-minute intervals. Pulsed- and continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic studies were performed at rest and at the end of each increment of dobutamine. Both peak and mean velocity and pressure gradient across the prostheses were measured, and effective orifice area, discharge coefficient, and performance index were calculated.

RESULTS

Dobutamine stress increased heart rate and cardiac output by 83% and 81%, respectively (both p < 0.0001), and mean transvalvular gradient increased from 15.6+/-5.5 mm Hg at rest to 35.4+/-11.9 mm Hg at maximum stress (p < 0.0001). Although the indexed effective orifice area was significantly lower in patients with a larger body surface area, this was not associated with any significant pressure gradient. The performance index of this valve was unchanged throughout the study. Regression analyses demonstrated that the mean transvalvular gradient at maximum stress was independent of all variables except resting gradient (p = 0.05). Body surface area had no association with the changes in cardiac output, transvalvular gradient at maximum stress, and effective orifice area.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that the 21-mm Sorin Bicarbon bileaflet mechanical prosthesis offers an excellent hemodynamic performance with full utilization of its available orifice when implanted in the aortic position. The lack of significant transvalvular gradient in patients with a larger body surface area suggests that patient-prosthesis mismatch is highly unlikely when this prosthesis is used.

Patient-prosthesis mismatch can be predicted at the time of operation

BACKGROUND

Patient-prosthesis mismatch is a frequent cause of high postoperative gradients in normally functioning prostheses. The objective of this study was to determine whether mismatch can be predicted at the time of operation.

METHODS

Indices used to predict mismatch were valve size, indexed internal geometric area, and projected indexed effective orifice area (EOA) calculated at the time of operation, and results were compared with indexed EOA and mean gradients measured by Doppler echocardiography after operation in 396 patients.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of these indices to detect mismatch, defined as a postoperative indexed EOA of 0.85 cm2/m2 or less, were respectively: 35% and 84% for valve size, 46% and 85% for indexed internal geometric area, and 73% and 80% for projected indexed EOA. Projected indexed EOA also correlated best with resting (r = 0.67) and exercise (r = 0.77) postoperative gradients.

CONCLUSIONS

The projected indexed EOA calculated at the time of operation accurately predicts mismatch as well as resting and exercise postoperative gradients, whereas valve size and indexed internal geometric area cannot be used for this purpose.