Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using extended right lobe grafts

Right lobe living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The shortage of livers for transplantation has prompted transplant centers to seek alternatives to conventional cadaveric liver transplantation. Left lateral segmentectomy from living donors has proven to be a safe operation for the donor with excellent results in the pediatric population. Left lobectomy, conceived to supply more tissue, still provides insufficient liver mass for an average size adult patient. Right lobectomy could supply a graft of adequate size.

METHODS

Donors were considered only after recipients were listed according to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) criteria. Donor evaluation included liver biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging, and celiac and mesenteric angiography. The donor operation consisted of a right lobectomy uniformly performed throughout the series as described herein.

RESULTS

Twenty-five right lobe living donor liver transplants were performed between adults, with no significant complications in donors. Recipient and graft survival was 88%, with three recipient deaths secondary to uncontrolled sepsis in patients at high risk for liver transplant; all three had functioning grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

Right lobe living donor liver transplantation poses challenges that require a meticulous surgical technique to minimize morbidity in the recipient. Right lobectomies for living donation can be performed safely with minimal risk to both donor and recipient although providing adequate liver mass for an average size adult patient.

Auxiliary partial orthotopic living donor liver transplantation as an aid for small-for-size grafts in larger recipients

BACKGROUND

In countries where living donors are the only source of liver grafts, restrictions on graft size are a serious obstacle for the expansion of indications for adult recipients. To overcome this problem, auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplants (APOLT*) was performed on the basis of the concept that the residual native liver would support the graft function until the graft had grown enough to function by itself.

METHODS

APOLT as an aid for small-for-size (SFS) grafts was reviewed retrospectively to evaluate its feasibility. Between April 1995 and March 1998, 20 recipients underwent APOLT, which was indicated because of a SFS graft in 15 of them. The indication was based on the estimated graft/recipient's body weight ratio (GRWR). If the ratio was <0.8%, APOLT was performed. The other 5 patients had a graft with a GRWR >0.8% and underwent APOLT on the basis of the residual native liver supporting the graft function temporarily, 4 for supplementation of the defective enzyme in metabolic liver diseases and one for leaving the potential of the regeneration of the native liver in fulminant hepatic failure. The recipients who underwent APOLT because of a SFS graft were categorized as the SFS group, and the others were the second group.

RESULTS

In the SFS group, the age of the recipients ranged from 13 to 48 (median 23). The original indications of this group were fulminant hepatic failure in 2 recipients, acute deterioration of chronic liver diseases in 3, Wilson's disease in 2, biliary atresia in 4, primary biliary cirrhosis in 3, and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) in one. The actual GRWR ranged from 0.45 to 0.72 (median 0.55). The graft was implanted after resection of the left lateral segment of the native liver. Except in the first two patients, the portal vein to the residual native liver was completely transected so that all of the portal blood drained into the graft liver. This procedure was successful in 9 patients. The cause of death in the other 6 was mainly infection. The mortality rate among the recipients with signs of advanced liver failure, such as massive ascites or hepatic coma, was higher, even though APOLT was used to support the SFS graft. In the second group, in the other five recipients who underwent APOLT for other indications, one recipient with fulminant hepatic failure died of sepsis caused by the dehiscence of bilio-enteric anastomosis.

CONCLUSIONS

APOLT as an aid for a SFS graft is technically viable. This procedure can thus expand the indication of living donor liver transplants for adult recipients when the native liver retains some functional capability to support the grafted liver during the immediate postoperative period.

Liver transplantation

The growing disparity between available organs for liver transplantation and the number of waiting recipients has prompted significant debate over organ allocation and distribution. In light of this debate, recipient selection and prediction of factors relating to outcome have become increasingly important. Current immunosuppressive regimens provide excellent short-and long-term survival for patients and grafts. Increasingly, efforts are being made to decrease or withdraw immunosuppression late after transplantation to minimize long-term side effects. Viral disease, particularly cytomegalovirus infection, results in significant morbidity and mortality in patients. However, strategies for targeting high-risk patients with prophylactic antiviral therapy have been successful in reducing the incidence of cytomegalovirus disease. Recurrent viral hepatitis following liver transplantation may limit long-term graft success. Lamivudine appears to limit recurrent infection with hepatitis B virus in a significant number of patients who develop this condition following liver transplantation and may represent a cost savings over hepatitis B immunoglobulin. Although the overall survival of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection after orthotopic liver transplantation is excellent, significant morbidity and mortality occur in the subset of patients with severe recurrent disease. Interferon may delay the onset of disease in patients infected with hepatitis C virus following orthotopic liver transplantation, and investigation continues into antiviral therapy in this group of patients.

[Orthotopic liver transplantation from a living adult donor to an adult using the right hepatic lobe]

STUDY AIM

In children, living donor liver transplantation has been shown to be efficient in treating end-stage liver diseases when the left lateral segment is harvested. In adults, more liver mass is needed to provide adequate hepatic function. The aim of this study is to report 2 successful cases of living donor liver transplantation using a right hepatic lobe from adult.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 2 sons, the right hepatic lobe was harvested without the middle hepatic vein for transplantation in their fathers who were suffering from end-stage liver cirrhosis. Hepatectomy was done without vascular inflow occlusion after dissection of vascular and biliary structures, itself strictly restricted to the right side. In recipients, the graft was implanted orthotopically with preservation of the native inferior vena cava and after temporary porto-caval shunt.

RESULTS

The duration of donors procedures was 7 h and 11 h 45 min; intra-operative transfusions comprised of 700 mL from cell-saver in the first case, and 1300 mL plus 1 autologous red blood cell unit in the second case. Graft weights were 770 g and 1100 g. None of the donors experienced liver failure and both were able to leave the hospital 9 days after the operation. In recipients, initial graft function was excellent in the first case and correct in the second case, despite the necessity to redo intra-operatively the hepatic vein anastomosis secondary to a twisting. Patients were discharged 20 and 40 days respectively following transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Adult living donor liver transplantation using a right hepatic lobe is efficient and safe. This option could contribute to reducing the mortality of patients on the waiting list.

Impact of graft size mismatching on graft prognosis in liver transplantation from living donors

BACKGROUND

Although living donor liver transplantation for small pediatric patients is increasingly accepted, its expansion to older/larger patients is still in question because of the lack of sufficient information on the impact of graft size mismatching.

METHODS

A total of 276 cases of living donor liver transplantation, excluding ABO-incompatible, auxiliary, or secondary transplants, were reviewed from graft size matching. Forty-three cases were highly urgent cases receiving intensive care preoperatively. Cases were categorized into five groups by graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR): extra-small-for-size (XS; GRWR<0.8%, 17 elective and 4 urgent cases), small (S; 0.8< or =GRWR< 1.0%, 21 and 7), medium (M; 1.0< or =GRWR<3.0%, 119 and 19), large (L; 3.0< or =GRWR<5.0%, 67 and 10), and extra-large (XL; GRWR> or =5.0%, 9 and 3).

RESULTS

Smaller-for-size grafts were associated not only with larger and older recipients, but also with rather older donors. Posttransplant bilirubin clearance was delayed and aspartate aminotransferase corrected by relative graft size was higher in XS and S. Posttransplant hemorrhage and intestinal perforation were more frequent in XS and S, and vascular complications and acute rejection were more frequent in larger-for-size grafts. Consequently, graft survival in XS (cumulative 58% and actuarial 42% at 1 year) and S (76% and 74%) was significantly lower compared with that in M (93% and 92%) in elective cases. Graft survival in L (83% and 82%) and XL (75% and 71%) did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of small-for-size grafts (less than 1% of recipient body weight) leads to lower graft survival, probably through enhanced parenchymal cell injury and reduced metabolic and synthetic capacity. Although large-for-size grafts are associated with some anatomical and immunological disadvantages, the negative impact is less pronounced.

Applicability of living donor liver transplantation to high-urgency patients

BACKGROUND

Cadaveric liver donors are scarce in Hong Kong, and the application of liver transplantation to high-urgency patients is limited. We evaluated the use of grafts from living donors in this setting.

METHODS

From July 1994 to January 1998, 49 consecutive adult patients who were intensive care unit-bound because of acute or chronic liver failure were put on a high-urgency list for liver transplantation. Family members were not solicited for living donation, and the initiation and decision for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was based on the donor's voluntary intent. Assessment of the living donor, including blood tests, computed tomographic volumetry, and angiography, was performed only after informed consent was executed.

RESULTS

In 25 of 49 (51%) patients, no family member volunteered as living donor; 23 died awaiting donor organs, and 2 received a cadaveric graft. Twenty-four (49%) patients had 36 family members who volunteered as living donors. Before evaluation of living donor was completed, two patients received a cadaveric liver transplant. LDLT was not performed in nine patients because of recipient contraindications (n=4), ABO blood group incompatibility (n=3), and withdrawal of donor (n=2). Eight of these nine patients died, and one received a cadaveric liver graft. The remaining 13 (27%) patients received grafts from living donors. Four of 5 (80%) patients who underwent cadaveric liver transplantation and 11 of 13 (85%) who underwent LDLT survived. Thus, emergency transplantation from living donors increased the applicability of liver transplantation from 10% to 37%, and the survival rate after emergency LDLT (85%) was superior to that of the remaining patients (11%).

CONCLUSIONS

When cadaveric organ donation is scarce, emergency liver transplantation from living donors can be applied to high-urgency adult patients.

Liver transplantation in Asia: Problems and practice

Liver transplantation in Asia has been difficult to establish due to: a reluctance in Asians to donate organs; a lack of financial support; and the predominance of hepatitis B in the population, which effectively reduces the number of cadaveric organs. To overcome the problem of organ shortage, living-related liver transplantation for paediatric patients was rapidly established initially at Kyoto University, Japan, and then in several centres in Asia. Living-related liver transplantation was extended to adults using the left lobe in 1994 and using the right lobe in 1996. Up to May 1998, 785 liver transplantations had been performed in major centres in Asia with a patient survival rate approaching 80%. To overcome the problem of hepatitis B viral infection, lamivudine is now used peri-operatively. Lamivudine is shown to be very effective in preventing graft reinfection. Of the 15 patients who received lamivudine and liver transplantation at Queen Mary Hospital, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) disappeared in 11 patients and hepatitis B virus DNA was not detectable in any of them. Two patients had a reappearance of HBsAg after an initial loss, but their liver grafts were not affected by hepatitis. Compared with hepatitis B immunoglobulin, lamivudine is definitely cheaper and more convenient. In conclusion, even though there are major obstacles to liver transplantation in Asia, steady progress is being made. Hopefully, when the number of cadaveric grafts increases in future, an increasing number of patients can benefit.

Concomitant caudate lobe resection as an option for donor hepatectomy in adult living related liver transplantation

In this article, we describe a successful adult living related partial liver transplantation (LRLT) using the left lobe with the left-side caudate lobe (the Spiegel lobe and the left side of the paracaval portion). The size of the donor's left lobe was 29% of the recipient's standard liver volume and did not seem to meet our criteria for adult-to-adult LRLT. However, the donor had a thick left-side caudate lobe. The estimated volume of the left lobe with the left-side caudate lobe was 32%, which met our criteria for the adult recipient. The recipient's CT scan on day 87 after transplantation showed the preserved blood flow and no biliary congestion in the left-side caudate lobe, which suggests maintenance of lobe function. This procedure may be an option for adult-to-adult LRLT in which the donor has a thick left-side caudate lobe.