Myocardial protection by brief ischemia in noncardiac tissue

The role of adenosine in preconditioning

Preconditioning is a powerful form of (myocardial) protection that follows brief sublethal ischemia. G-protein-coupled receptors constitute the trigger for entrance to the preconditioned state. In conjunction with other receptors, various membrane adenosine receptors play an important role in the transduction of extracellular signals, leading to protection by preconditioning, lasting 1-3 hr. Adenosine A(1)- and A(3)-receptors mediate inhibition of adenylate cyclase via a guanine nucleotide binding inhibitory protein (G(i/o)). A(2)-receptors couple to a comparable stimulatory protein (G(s)). Adenosine receptors are especially abundant in the central nervous system; in lesser numbers, they are found in many tissues, including the heart. A(1)-receptors are located on cardiomyocytes and vascular smooth muscle cells, A(2)-receptors on endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells, and A(3)-receptors on ventricular myocytes. Ischemic preconditioning by endogenous adenosine takes place through A(1)- and A(3)-receptors. A(2A/B)-receptor activation results in vasodilation. The relevance of cellular mediators, such as 5'-nucleotidase, to generate adenosine for preconditioning is controversial. In contrast, the role of protein kinase C (PKC) is clearly established. Signals from different receptors converge at PKC, reaching a threshold activation of the kinase necessary to induce protection. Tyrosine and mitogen-activated protein kinases may play a role in addition to PKC. The exact products downstream responsible for the memory of preconditioning are elusive. A prime candidate for the end-effector of preconditioning is the K(ATP) channel. Preconditioning with adenosine-receptor agonists offers the possibility for treatment of coronary artery disease, but research in this field is still in its infancy.

Preconditioning the Brain and Heart: Implications for Cardiac Surgery

Despite many recent advances in emboli detection, aortic imaging, myocardial preservation, and perfusion equipment, ischemic injury to the heart and brain remains a serious complications after cardiac surgery. Hypoperfusion (particularly in the heart) and microem boli (particularly in the brain) during cardiopulmonary bypass constitute the etiology of ischemia. Although hypothermia has traditionally been the mainstay for systemic protection from transient ischemia, there has been a general trend to accept warmer heart and core temperatures during bypass, which increases the poten tial for ischemic injury to various organs. This article discusses recent advances in the understanding of myocardial and brain preconditioning and their poten tial role to provide additional protection during cardiac surgery.

Bradykinin mediates cardiac preconditioning at a distance

Preconditioning the heart by brief coronary (CAO) or mesenteric artery occlusion (MAO) can protect against damage during subsequent prolonged CAO and reperfusion. The role of bradykinin (BK) in remote cardiac preconditioning by MAO is investigated by antagonizing the BK B(2) receptor [Hoechst 140 (HOE-140)] or simulating local BK release by mesenteric intra-arterial infusion. Anesthetized male Wistar rats (n = 6-8) were treated with HOE-140 or saline before starting the preconditioning protocol, CAO, MAO, or non-preconditioned control. Infarct size related to risk area [ratio of infarct area to area at risk (IA/AR)] was determined after 3 h of reperfusion following a 60-min CAO. IA/AR was 62 +/- 5% in controls and not affected by HOE-140 (58 +/- 6%). CAO as well as MAO significantly protected the heart (IA/AR, 37 +/- 3 and 35 +/- 5%), which was prevented by HOE-140 (IA/AR, 71 +/- 6 and 65 +/- 7%, respectively). Brief intramesenteric BK infusion mimicked MAO (IA/AR, 26 +/- 3%). Pretreatment with hexamethonium could abolish this protection (IA/AR, 67 +/- 4%). These data indicate an important role for BK in remote preconditioning by MAO. Results support the hypothesis that remote preconditioning acts through sensory nerve stimulation in the ischemic organ.

"Preconditioning at a distance" in the isolated rabbit heart

OBJECTIVE

Brief myocardial ischemia evokes a cardioprotective response, referred to as "ischemic preconditioning" (IP), that limits injury caused by a subsequent prolonged ischemic insult. The myocardial IP effect can be induced by ischemia of "distant" cardiac and noncardiac tissue, implicating the involvement of an as-yet-unidentified humoral trigger. If a preconditioning hormone exists, the authors hypothesize that the IP effect should be transferable, via administration of coronary effluent, from a preconditioned donor heart to a virgin non-preconditioned acceptor heart.

METHODS

Isolated buffer-perfused rabbit hearts were assigned to one of four treatment groups in a donor/acceptor sequence. Donor hearts underwent either three IP cycles or a matched period of uninterrupted perfusion (control donors). Coronary perfusate collected from IP and control donor hearts was reoxygenated and transfused to virgin acceptor hearts. All hearts then underwent 30 minutes of global ischemia followed by 30 minutes of reperfusion. Left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) (the authors' index of cardioprotection) was monitored throughout the protocol by a left ventricular (LV) balloon.

RESULTS

In donor controls, LVDP assessed at 30 minutes post-reflow was restored to only 49 +/- 5% of baseline values. Recovery of LV function was significantly enhanced in both IP donor hearts (69 +/- 4%*) and IP acceptor hearts (70 +/- 6%*) vs donor controls (*p < 0.05), while, in acceptor controls, intermediate values of LVDP (62 +/- 7%) were obtained.

CONCLUSION

The IP effect can be transferred between rabbit hearts, suggesting the presence of a humoral trigger signal for distant preconditioning. Isolating this hormone may have therapeutic and diagnostic implications in the management of acute myocardial ischemia.

Does remote organ ischaemia trigger cardiac preconditioning during coronary artery surgery?

The aim of this study is to provide biochemical evidence of the occurrence of cardiac preconditioning via remote organ ischaemia on the patients undergoing coronary artery surgery. Eight male patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Blood samples were collected via coronary perfusion catheter immediately before cardiopulmonary bypass (point 0), prior to declamping aorta (point 1) and 5 min after declamping the aorta (point 2) to determine creatinine phosphokinase (CPK), CPK-MB and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels in the control group. A tourniquet wrapped around the right upper extremity of the patient was inflated and deflated twice to perform 3 min of ischaemia separated with 2 min of reperfusion in the preconditioning group. Blood samples were withdrawn as described for the control group. Only LDH levels at point 2 were found to be significantly higher than the control group's. These data implied that preconditioning appeared to protect myocardium by enhancing anaerobic glycolysis.

Rabbit heart can be "preconditioned" via transfer of coronary effluent

Brief myocardial ischemia not only evokes a local cardioprotective or "preconditioning" effect but also can render remote myocardium resistant to sustained ischemia. We propose the following hypotheses: remote protection is initiated by a humoral trigger; brief ischemia-reperfusion will result in release of the humoral trigger (possibly adenosine and/or norepinephrine) into the coronary effluent; and transfer of this effluent to a virgin acceptor heart will elicit cardioprotection. To test these concepts, effluent was collected during normal perfusion from donor-control hearts and during preconditioning ischemia-reperfusion from donor-preconditioned (PC) hearts. After reoxygenation occurred and aliquots for measurement of adenosine and norepinephrine content were harvested, effluent was transfused to acceptor-control and acceptor-PC hearts. All hearts then underwent 40 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion, and infarct size was delineated by tetrazolium staining. Mean infarct size was smaller in both donor- and acceptor-PC groups (9% of left ventricle) than in donor- and acceptor-control groups (36% and 34%; P < 0.01). Protection in acceptor-PC hearts could not, however, be attributed to adenosine or norepinephrine. Thus preconditioning-induced cardioprotection can be transferred between rabbit hearts by transfusion of coronary effluent. Although adenosine and norepinephrine are apparently not responsible, these results suggest that remote protection is initiated by a humoral mechanism.

Ischemic preconditioning may be transferable via whole blood transfusion: preliminary evidence

This research was designed to test the hypothesis that ischemic preconditioning can be transferred between animals via whole blood transfusion. Preconditioning at a distance refers to the reduction in myocardial infarct size seen when coronary artery occlusion is preceded by brief ischemic episodes of noncardiac tissue. Isolation of the trigger signal responsible for this effect may be useful in the diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary occlusive syndromes. Rabbits were paired by crossmatching blood samples prior to experimentation. Crossmatched pairs were placed into either preconditioned (P) or control sets. Rabbits in the preconditioned sets were further divided into donor (PD) and acceptor (PA) animals. PD animals underwent five episodes of circumflex and renal artery occlusion followed by reperfusion. Before and after each preconditioning episode, a whole blood exchange was performed between PD and PA animals. Alternatively, control rabbits underwent the same surgical procedures and time-sequenced transfusion without preconditioning. All animals then underwent prolonged circumflex occlusion (60 minutes) followed by reperfusion (30 minutes). The area of myocardium at risk (R) was determined by isotope-labeled microsphere injection. Infarct size (I) was determined by NBT staining. The percent infarct within the risk area (I/R) was then compared. The I/R was significantly lower in the PA (14.0% +/- 12.2) and PD (14.3% +/- 11.2) groups as compared with controls (61% +/- 20. 6). There was no significant difference between the tPA and TPD groups. In conclusion, the ischemic preconditioning effect can be transferred to nonpreconditioned animals via whole blood transfusion, suggesting a humoral mechanism for preconditioning at a distance.

Ischemic preconditioning may be transferable via whole blood transfusion: preliminary evidence

This research was designed to test the hypothesis that ischemic preconditioning can be transferred between animals via whole blood transfusion. Preconditioning at a distance refers to the reduction in myocardial infarct size seen when coronary artery occlusion is preceded by brief ischemic episodes of noncardiac tissue. Isolation of the trigger signal responsible for this effect may be useful in the diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary occlusive syndromes. Rabbits were paired by crossmatching blood samples prior to experimentation. Crossmatched pairs were placed into either preconditioned (P) or control sets. Rabbits in the preconditioned sets were further divided into donor (PD) and acceptor (PA) animals. PD animals underwent five episodes of circumflex and renal artery occlusion followed by reperfusion. Before and after each preconditioning episode, a whole blood exchange was performed between PD and PA animals. Alternatively, control rabbits underwent the same surgical procedures and time-sequenced transfusion without preconditioning. All animals then underwent prolonged circumflex occlusion (60 minutes) followed by reperfusion (30 minutes). The area of myocardium at risk (R) was determined by isotope-labeled microsphere injection. Infarct size (I) was determined by NBT staining. The percent infarct within the risk area (I/R) was then compared. The I/R was significantly lower in the PA (14.0% +/- 12.2) and PD (14.3% +/- 11.2) groups as compared with controls (61% +/- 20. 6). There was no significant difference between the tPA and TPD groups. In conclusion, the ischemic preconditioning effect can be transferred to nonpreconditioned animals via whole blood transfusion, suggesting a humoral mechanism for preconditioning at a distance.

Clinical effects of ischemic preconditioning

A variety of experimental studies have confirmed that preconditioning the myocardium by brief periods of ischemia represents a powerful cardioprotective effect resulting in a reduction of infarct size. After 15 years of research in the experimental laboratory, some evidence shows the existence of preconditioning in human patients with coronary artery disease: repeated balloon inflations before coronary angioplasty induce preconditioning-like effects; moreover, some studies demonstrate better clinical outcome in patients with angina before acute myocardial infarction, resembling a preconditioning effect. So far, a few drugs have been identified as potential mediators of preconditioning, e.g., adenosine, adenosine receptor agonists, and adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channel openers. Before coronary angioplasty and heart surgery, these preconditioning mimetics might be used to protect myocardial tissue by means of preconditioning. Further research is required before preconditioning mimetics could be used for therapy in patients with chronic myocardial ischemia. Possible antipreconditioning effects of several drugs, e.g., sulfonylurea drugs have to be considered in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease.

New insights into cardioprotection by ischemic preconditioning and other forms of stress

Ischemic preconditioning has not only received wide attention in heart research, but has also been a topic of extensive studies involving other organs. In several of these studies, it has been shown that in spite of differences in the endpoints used to assess protection, the same mediators as in myocardial ischemic preconditioning may be involved. However, several of the putative mediators do not require ischemia to become activated. This has guided us and others to investigate whether the myocardium can also be protected by brief ischemia in other organs and whether other non-pharmacological forms of stress, which do not produce ischemia but are capable of activating these potential mediators, are also cardioprotective.

Ischemia-reperfusion protects the rat small intestine against subsequent injury

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that multiple sublethal insults are commonly associated with the development of multiple organ failure (MOF). The gut is considered to be pivotal in the pathogenesis of MOF. This study investigated the effects of repeated ischemia-reperfusion of the rat small intestine.

METHODS

Groups of rats underwent 30 min of superior mesenteric artery occlusion or sham operation followed by 24 h of reperfusion. They then received an additional 30 min of superior mesenteric artery occlusion and 2 h of reperfusion or sham operation. Small intestine was examined for mucosal injury, neutrophil infiltration, goblet cell number, and generation of the eicosanoids, prostaglandin E2, and leukotriene B4. Activation of neutrophils was assessed in systemic venous blood.

RESULTS

Animals subjected to two insults of ischemia-reperfusion demonstrated significantly less mucosal injury than animals undergoing one episode of ischemia and 2 h of reperfusion, despite increased neutrophil infiltration, leukotriene B4, and activated systemic neutrophils. Goblet cell number was elevated in animals 24 h after the first ischemia-reperfusion insult and remained enhanced after the second episode of ischemia-reperfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial episode of ischemia-reperfusion caused an adaptive response associated with cytoarchitectural preservation following the subsequent insult. Increased mucus production was associated with mucosal protection. Nevertheless, repeated ischemia-reperfusion potentiated the local inflammatory response and the systemic activation of neutrophils.

Renal ischemia/reperfusion remotely improves myocardial energy metabolism during myocardial ischemia via adenosine receptors in rabbits: effects of "remote preconditioning"

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the changes in myocardial energy metabolism during myocardial ischemia after "remote preconditioning" and investigated the involvement of adenosine receptors in the mechanisms of this effect.

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have indicated that a brief period of ischemia and reperfusion (ischemic preconditioning, PC) in a remote organ reduces myocardial infarct size (IS) protecting against subsequent sustained myocardial ischemia. However, the mechanisms of "remote PC" remain unclear. We assessed myocardial energy metabolism during sustained myocardial ischemia and reperfusion after renal PC (RPC), in comparison with that after myocardial PC (MPC) in open-chest rabbits. It has been established that adenosine receptors are involved in the mechanisms of MPC.

METHODS

Rabbits that had been anesthetized with halothane were divided into six groups. The control (CNT) group underwent 40-min coronary occlusion followed by 120 min reperfusion. Before the procedure, the MPC group underwent an additional protocol of 5 min coronary artery occlusion and 20 min reperfusion, and the RPC group received a 10 min episode of renal artery occlusion and 20 min reperfusion. In additional experimental groups, 8 sulfophenyl-theophylline (SPT, 10 mg/kg), an adenosine receptor inhibitor, was intravenously injected before the 40 min myocardial ischemia (SPT, MPC + SPT and RPC + SPT groups, respectively). Myocardial levels of phosphocreatine (PCr), ATP and intracellular pH (pHi) were measured by 31P-NMR spectroscopy.

RESULTS

RPC and MPC delayed the decreases in ATP levels, preserved pHi during 40-min myocardial ischemia and resulted in better recovery of ATP and PCr during 120 min reperfusion compared with the controls. SPT abolished the improvement in myocardial energy metabolism and the reduction in myocardial IS caused by MPC or RPC. Myocardial IS in the CNT (n = 8), MPC (n = 9), RPC (n = 9), SPT (n = 6), MPC + SPT (n = 8) and RPC + SPT (n = 8) groups averaged 42.8+/-3.5%, 18.2+/-1.8%*, 19.6+/-1.3%*, 44.9+/-5.0%, 35.6+/-2.7% and 34.8+/-3.6% of the area at risk (*p < 0.05 vs. CNT), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PC in a remote organ, similar to MPC, improved myocardial energy metabolism during ischemia and reperfusion and reduced IS in vivo by an adenosine-dependent mechanism in rabbits.

Renal ischemia preconditions myocardium: role of adenosine receptors and ATP-sensitive potassium channels

Brief renal ischemia-reperfusion is reported to precondition the myocardium; however, the underlying mechanisms are unknown. This phenomenon was, therefore, investigated using an in vivo rabbit model of acute myocardial infarction. Characterization of the mechanisms involved was performed using the nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist 8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline (8-SPT) and the ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channel blocker sodium 5-hydroxydecanoate (5-HD). Pentobarbital-anesthetized rabbits underwent a left thoracotomy and pericardiotomy. A laparotomy was then performed to expose the left renal artery. Animals were either preconditioned with a 10-min occlusion of the renal artery followed by 10 min of reperfusion or underwent a 20-min sham period of anesthesia. Subsequently, the left coronary artery was then occluded for 30 min and reperfused for 2 h. Infarct-to-risk ratio was limited from 32.7 +/- 4.0% (n = 12) in controls to 17.8 +/- 3.0% (n = 9; P = 0.002) in preconditioned hearts. Protection was abolished by 7.5 mg/kg iv 8-SPT (36.7 +/- 3.7%; n = 6) or 5 mg/kg iv 5-HD (33.1 +/- 4. 4%; n = 6) administered before preconditioning. 8-SPT (40.0 +/- 4. 4%; n = 6) or 5-HD (40.5 +/- 4.2%; n = 6) did not affect infarct-to-risk ratio in sham controls. Thus activation of both adenosine receptors and KATP channels appears to be involved in acute renal preconditioning of the myocardium.

The expression of constitutively active isotypes of protein kinase C to investigate preconditioning

The role of protein kinase C (PKC) in ischemic preconditioning remains controversial because of difficulties with both its measurement and pharmacological manipulation. We investigated preconditioning in isolated neonatal rat cardiocytes by expressing constitutively active isotypes of PKC. Observations at differing durations of simulated ischemia suggested beta-galactosidase (beta-gal) activity reflected viability within transfected myocytes. Preconditioning with 90 min of ischemia significantly increased beta-gal activity and myocyte survival after 6 h of ischemia; an effect abolished by PKC inhibitors. After co-transfection with plasmids encoding beta-gal and either constitutively active mutants of PKC-delta, PKC-alpha, wild type PKC-delta, or empty vector, cardiocytes were subjected to 6 h of ischemia. Only PKC-delta, rendered constitutively active by a limited deletion within the pseudosubstrate domain, consistently increased resistance to simulated ischemia (beta-gal activity was 85.6 +/- 11.9% versus 53.7 +/- 6.5% (p </= 0.01) and dead myocytes 46.8 +/- 3.4% versus 68.7 +/- 2.8% (p </= 0.01)). Since transfection was apparent in only 5-12% of cells, the results suggested a protective bystander effect that was confirmed by co-culture of transfected myocytes with untransfected myocytes. In neonatal cardiocytes expression of active PKC-delta increases resistance to simulated ischemia. This observation may provide further insight into the mechanism and possible avenues for therapeutic exploitation of preconditioning.

Ischemic preconditioning: exploring the paradox

Brief transient episodes of nonlethal myocardial ischemia protect or "precondition" the heart and render the myocardium resistant to a subsequent more sustained ischemic insult. The hallmark of this phenomenon--documented in virtually all species and experimental models evaluated to date in countless laboratories worldwide--is the profound reduction in infarct size seen in preconditioned groups versus time-matched controls. Efforts to identify the cellular mechanisms responsible for this paradoxical ischemia-induced cardioprotection, to expand the definition of ischemic preconditioning beyond infarct size reduction, and, perhaps most importantly, to evaluate the efficacy of preconditioning in disease models and in the clinical setting, are all topics of intensive ongoing investigation.

Cardioprotection by local heating: improved myocardial salvage after ischemia and reperfusion

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that expression of the inducible 70-kD heat-shock protein (HSP72) by whole-body hyperthermia is associated with protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury. To develop techniques for regional elevation of heat-shock proteins that prevent extracardiac sequelae during whole-body hyperthermia, we sought to determine if local heating of the heart in vivo provides protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat.

METHODS

A thermal probe was used to locally heat rat hearts at two adjacent sites on the epicardial surface of the left ventricle. Rats were subjected to either 30 minutes of sham surgery (control; n = 10) or two local applications of the probe at 42.5 degrees to 43.5 degrees C for 15 minutes each (n = 9). After 4 hours, rats were subjected to 30 minutes of regional ischemia followed by 120 minutes of reperfusion. Hearts were removed and area at risk and infarct area were determined.

RESULTS

Localized heat stress resulted in a significant limitation of infarct size in heat-treated animals versus controls (mean +/- standard error of the mean infarct area/area at risk = 4.3% +/- 0.85 versus 19.2% +/- 3.4%; p < 0.005). Western blot experiments confirmed elevated HSP72 expression in left (heated) and right (nonheated) ventricular samples from treated animals (n = 6; left ventricular = 5.5-fold; right ventricular = 3.7-fold) compared with sham-operated controls. Controls treated with the probe at 37 degrees C (n = 4) showed no increases in HSP72.

CONCLUSIONS

Local heating of the heart is associated with elevated levels of HSP72 and improved myocardial salvage. The increase in expression of HSP72 is not limited to the heated region, but extends into nonheated regions of the heart as well. This may lead to the development of new techniques that improve methods of myocardial revascularization and heart transplantation procedures.

Does protein kinase C play a pivotal role in the mechanisms of ischemic preconditioning?

This communication reviews the evidence for the pivotal role of protein kinase C in ischemic myocardial preconditioning. It is believed that several intracellular signalling pathways via receptor-coupled phospholipase C and its "cross-talk" with phospholipase D converge to activation of protein kinase C isotypes which is followed by phosphorylation of until now (a number of) unknown target proteins which produce the protective state of ischemic preconditioning. After briefly introducing the general biochemical properties of protein kinase C, its isotypes and the limitations of the methodology used to investigate the role of protein kinase C, studies are discussed in which pharmacological inhibition and activation and (immunore) activity and/or isotypes measurements of protein kinase C isotypes were applied to assess the role of activation of protein kinase C in ischemic myocardial preconditioning. It is concluded that definitive proof for the involvement of protein kinase C in preconditioning requires future studies which must focus on the isotype(s) of protein kinase C that are activated, the duration of action, cellular translocation sites and the identity and stability (of covalently bound phosphate) of phosphorylated substrate proteins.