Pill burden, adherence, hyperphosphatemia, and quality of life in maintenance dialysis patients

Pharmacotherapy of end-stage renal disease

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

The incidence and prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) continues to grow worldwide. ESRD causes significant morbidity and mortality and has enormous financial and personal costs.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Major electronic databases (including the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched from 1989 to September 2009 to summarize current pharmacotherapy of ESRD-associated complications in adults receiving maintenance dialysis (hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis). Current guidelines for the treatment of ESRD (e.g., NKF-K/DOQI, KDIGO, and the ERA-EDTA's European Renal Best Practice Guidelines) were included.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Commonly used pharmacological treatment strategies for chronic arterial hypertension, anemia, iron management, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and for disturbances of bone and mineral metabolism, including hyperphosphatemia and secondary hyperparathyroidism in ESRD, are presented. In addition, the reader will learn that nonadherence to oral medication in ESRD can contribute significantly to excess morbidity and mortality of the dialysis population.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Improvements in pharmacotherapy of ESRD may be at least in part counteracted by continuously increasing age and comorbid disease of the dialysis population. Individualized and tailor-made pharmacological management of the ESRD patient remains a challenge for the future.

Health-related quality of life outcomes in chronic kidney disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) endure compromised health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Although the link between HRQOL and increased mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is well documented, less is known about the relationship between CKD and HRQOL. This article reviews the recent evidence on HRQOL, its correlates and proposed intervention strategies to improve HRQOL in CKD.

RECENT FINDINGS

A growing body of literature indicates that various comorbid conditions related to CKD play a substantial role in impaired HRQOL in CKD. Hypertension, both a cause and complication of CKD, negatively affects HRQOL due to associated comorbidities, side effects from antihypertensive medications and awareness of the diagnosis. Anemia has been associated with HRQOL, but concerns about the safety of erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) have led to more conservative anemia treatment. Frailty, symptom burden and depression are also major contributory factors to HRQOL in CKD.

SUMMARY

Certain determinants of HRQOL in CKD, namely anemia and depression, are treatable. Early identification and correction may improve overall well being of patients. Clinical trials are required to demonstrate whether treatment interventions benefit HRQOL in this high-risk population. Furthermore, whether integration of HRQOL assessment into routine clinical practice will improve HRQOL outcomes remains to be determined.

Barriers to adult hemodialysis patients' self-management of oral medications

Hemodialysis patients use a variety of oral medications on a daily basis to control their kidney disease and comorbid illnesses. Under the new paradigm of kidney disease care for dialysis units outlined in the 2008 US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Conditions for Coverage, there has been a formal shift in the role of the hemodialysis patient from a passive participant in care planning to a fully collaborative member of the interdisciplinary team. In the chronic disease care field, the focus from patient compliance or patient adherence to patient self-management complements this paradigm shift in dialysis care. In this narrative review, we discuss key barriers to adult hemodialysis patient self-management of oral medications that include pill burden, demographic and socioeconomic variables, psychosocial factors, health literacy, patient satisfaction, and health beliefs. We further examine these barriers in the context of the 2008 Medicare Conditions for Coverage. To promote hemodialysis patients' self-management of oral medication regimens, additional research and behavioral interventions are needed to help hemodialysis patients overcome obstacles that impede their ability to effectively manage chronic illness and improve health outcomes.

KDOQI US commentary on the 2009 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of CKD-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD)

This commentary provides a US perspective on the 2009 KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD). KDIGO is an independent international organization with the primary mission of the promotion, coordination, collaboration, and integration of initiatives to develop and implement clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with kidney disease. The National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI), recognizing that international guidelines need to be adapted for each country, convened a group of experts to comment on the application and implementation of the KDIGO guideline for patients with CKD in the United States. This commentary puts the KDIGO guideline into the context of the supporting evidence and the setting of care delivered in the United States and summarizes important differences between prior KDOQI guidelines and the newer KDIGO guideline. It also considers the potential impact of a new bundled payment system for dialysis clinics. The KDIGO guideline addresses the evaluation and treatment of abnormalities of CKD-MBD in adults and children with CKD stages 3-5 on long-term dialysis therapy or with a kidney transplant. Tests considered are those that relate to laboratory, bone, and cardiovascular abnormality detection and monitoring. Treatments considered are interventions to treat hyperphosphatemia, hyperparathyroidism, and bone disease in patients with CKD stages 3-5D and 1-5T. Limitations of the evidence are discussed. The lack of definitive clinical outcome trials explains why most recommendations are not of level 1 but of level 2 strength, which means weak or discretionary recommendations. Suggestions for future research highlight priority areas.

Hypophosphatemic effect of niacin in patients without renal failure: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Niacin administration lowers the marked hyperphosphatemia that is characteristic of renal failure. We examined whether niacin administration also reduces serum phosphorus concentrations in patients who have dyslipidemia and are free of advanced renal disease.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We performed a post hoc data analysis of serum phosphorus concentrations that had been determined serially (at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24) among 1547 patients who had dyslipidemia and were randomly assigned in a 3:2:1 ratio to treatment with extended release niacin (ERN; 1 g/d for 4 weeks and dose advanced to 2 g/d for 20 weeks) combined with the selective prostaglandin D2 receptor subtype 1 inhibitor laropiprant (L; n = 761), ERN alone (n = 518), or placebo (n = 268).

RESULTS

Repeated measures analysis revealed that ERN-L treatment resulted in a net mean (95% confidence interval) serum phosphorus change comparing ERN-L with placebo treatment of -0.13 mmol/L (-0.15 to -0.13 mmol/L; -0.41 mg/dl [-0.46 to -0.37 mg/dl]). These results were consistent across the subgroups defined by estimated GFR of <60 or > or =60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), a serum phosphorus of >1.13 mmol/L (3.5 mg/dl) versus < or =1.13 mmol/L (3.5 mg/dl), the presence of clinical diabetes, or concomitant statin use.

CONCLUSIONS

We have provided definitive evidence that once-daily ERN-L treatment causes a sustained 0.13-mmol/L (0.4-mg/dl) reduction in serum phosphorus concentrations, approximately 10% from baseline, which is unaffected by estimated GFR ranging from 30 to > or =90 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (i.e., stages 1 through 3 chronic kidney disease).

Economic evaluation of sevelamer versus calcium-based phosphate binders in hemodialysis patients: a secondary analysis using centers for Medicare & Medicaid services data

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A secondary analysis of the Dialysis Clinical Outcomes Revisited (DCOR) trial suggested that sevelamer reduced hospitalizations relative to calcium-based phosphate binders. However, whether changed medical costs associated with reduced hospitalizations or other medical services offset the higher cost of sevelamer is unclear. This DCOR secondary analysis aimed to (1) evaluate Medicare total, inpatient, outpatient, skilled nursing facility, and other costs in sevelamer-treated versus calcium-treated patients; (2) examine Medicare costs in specific categories to determine cost drivers; and (3) estimate and incorporate sevelamer and calcium binder costs.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

DCOR trial participants were linked to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ESRD database. Medicare costs for 1895 dosed Medicare-primary-payer participants were evaluated. Phosphate binder costs were incorporated. Costs were indexed to 2001 (study base year). Sensitivity analyses were performed with randomized participants, two follow-up periods, and 2004 as index year.

RESULTS

Inflation-adjusted Medicare per member per month (PMPM) costs were lower for sevelamer-treated than for calcium-treated participants by a mean differential of $199 PMPM (mean, $5236 versus $5435; median, $4653 versus $4933), mainly because of lower inpatient costs for the sevelamer group (mean, $1461 versus $1644; median, $909 versus $1144). However, after phosphate binder costs were incorporated, costs trended lower for calcium-treated than for sevelamer-treated patients (differential -$81, 95% confidence interval -$321 to $157 PMPM, using average wholesale price; -$25, -$256 to $213 PMPM, using wholesale acquisition cost).

CONCLUSIONS

Sevelamer reduced inpatient Medicare costs compared with calcium binders. However, when binder costs were added, overall PMPM costs favored calcium-treated over sevelamer-treated participants.