1
|
Marziliano A, Miller SM, Fleisher LG, Ropka ME, Stanton AL, Wen KY, Cornelius T, Lapitan E, Diefenbach MA. Examining the impact of a multimedia intervention on decisional conflict and psychological distress among early-stage breast cancer patients: results from a nationwide RCT. Transl Behav Med 2023; 13:727-735. [PMID: 37379519 PMCID: PMC10538468 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibad037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
We conducted a nationwide, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of Healing Choices, a novel interactive education and treatment decision program rooted in the self-regulation theory framework, on decisional conflict and psychological distress at 2-month post-intervention in women with early-stage breast cancer. Patients were randomized to receive the National Cancer Institute's standard print material (control) or standard print material plus Healing Choices (the intervention). The final sample at 2-month post-intervention consisted of N = 388 participants (intervention: n = 197; control: n = 191). There were no significant differences in decisional conflict or its subscales; however, psychological distress was higher in the intervention group (16.09 ± 10.25) than in the control group (14.37 ± 8.73) at follow-up, B = 1.88, 95% CI [-0.03, 3.80], t(383) = 1.94, p = .05. Upon further examination, we found that engagement with the intervention was low-41%-prompting as-treated analyses, which showed no difference in distress between users and nonusers and a positive impact of Healing Choices on decisional conflict: decisional support subscale: users (35.36 ± 15.50) versus nonusers (39.67 ± 15.99), B = -4.31 (s.e. = 2.09), p = .04. Multiple recommendations for moving ahead stem from this work: (i) intent-to-treat analyses appeared to cause distress, cautioning against interventions that may lead to information overload; (ii) engagement with the intervention is low and future work needs to focus on increasing engagement and monitoring it throughout the study; and (iii) in studies with low engagement, as-treated analyses are critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Marziliano
- Institute of Health System Science, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Suzanne M Miller
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Linda G Fleisher
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mary E Ropka
- Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Emeritus, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Annette L Stanton
- Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry/Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kuang-Yi Wen
- Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Talea Cornelius
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emmanuel Lapitan
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael A Diefenbach
- Institute of Health System Science, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cordeiro JV. Digital Technologies and Data Science as Health Enablers: An Outline of Appealing Promises and Compelling Ethical, Legal, and Social Challenges. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:647897. [PMID: 34307394 PMCID: PMC8295525 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.647897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Digital technologies and data science have laid down the promise to revolutionize healthcare by transforming the way health and disease are analyzed and managed in the future. Digital health applications in healthcare include telemedicine, electronic health records, wearable, implantable, injectable and ingestible digital medical devices, health mobile apps as well as the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to medical and public health prognosis and decision-making. As is often the case with technological advancement, progress in digital health raises compelling ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI). This article aims to succinctly map relevant ELSI of the digital health field. The issues of patient autonomy; assessment, value attribution, and validation of health innovation; equity and trustworthiness in healthcare; professional roles and skills and data protection and security are highlighted against the backdrop of the risks of dehumanization of care, the limitations of machine learning-based decision-making and, ultimately, the future contours of human interaction in medicine and public health. The running theme to this article is the underlying tension between the promises of digital health and its many challenges, which is heightened by the contrasting pace of scientific progress and the timed responses provided by law and ethics. Digital applications can prove to be valuable allies for human skills in medicine and public health. Similarly, ethics and the law can be interpreted and perceived as more than obstacles, but also promoters of fairness, inclusiveness, creativity and innovation in health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João V Cordeiro
- Public Health Research Centre, NOVA National School of Public Health, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.,Comprehensive Health Research Center, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.,Centro Interdisciplinar de Ciências Sociais, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Navigating Ethical Practices in the Era of High Cost Hematology. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2020; 15:401-407. [PMID: 33025550 DOI: 10.1007/s11899-020-00599-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In this review article, we will highlight ethical issues faced by hematologists due to a growing constellation of expensive diagnostics and therapeutics in hematology. We outline the important issues surrounding this topic including stakeholders, cost considerations, and various ethical challenges surrounding access to care, communication about costs, and individual vs. societal responsibilities. We review available tools to navigate these ethical themes and offer potential solutions. RECENT FINDINGS We identified several gaps in the literature on the topic of ethical issues in hematology treatment and supplement by non-hematological cancer and general medical literature. We propose proactive solutions to address these problems to include cost transparency, utilization of evidence-based decision making tools, application of the four quadrant approach to ethical care, and advanced systems-based practice curriculum for physician trainees.
Collapse
|
4
|
Baird A, Kibbe B, Lesandrini J. Stakeholder bias in best practice advisories: an ethical perspective. JAMIA Open 2020; 3:142-145. [PMID: 32734150 PMCID: PMC7382625 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinicians are increasingly being asked to heed and follow the guidance provided by “best practice advisories.” Such advisories, often in the form of electronic reminders or alerts, are meant to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of evidence-based medical practice. However, we argue that best practice advisories can sometimes be infused with stakeholder bias, even if inadvertently. We specifically argue that best practice advisory biases can occur when an advisory is not oriented to benefit patients at least as much or more than other stakeholders. To address this issue, we put forth the perspective that ethical consideration of biases is especially important in best practice advisory design and revision processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Baird
- Institute of Health Administration, and Department of Computer Information Systems, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, and
| | - Bryan Kibbe
- Ethics Department, WellStar Health System, Marietta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jason Lesandrini
- Ethics Department, WellStar Health System, Marietta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|