Smoller BR, Flynn TC. Immunohistochemical examination of lichen nitidus suggests that it is not a localized papular variant of lichen planus.
J Am Acad Dermatol 1992;
27:232-6. [PMID:
1430362 DOI:
10.1016/0190-9622(92)70176-g]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Lichen nitidus is believed, by some, to be a variant of lichen planus, and by others to be a distinct entity.
OBJECTIVE
We examined five cases of lichen nitidus with immunohistochemical reagents designed to characterize the dermal inflammatory infiltrate in an attempt to resolve the uncertainty.
METHODS
We stained formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections with the following antibodies: L26, A6, KP1, BerH2, OPD4, and HECA-452.
RESULTS
The inflammatory infiltrate was 90% A6+, with few L26+ cells. In contrast to lichen planus, KP1+ macrophages were seen and fewer of the lymphocytes demonstrated HECA-452. Fifty percent to 80% of lymphocytes were OPD4 positive, similar to that usually seen in lichen planus. Rare Ki-1+ cells were seen in one case.
CONCLUSION
We believe that the pattern of a mixed cellular infiltrate characterized by macrophages and a helper T cell response with few HECA-452+ cells is somewhat different from the pattern seen in lichen planus, wherein almost all of the cells are CD4+/HECA-452+ lymphocytes. This suggests a different immunologic pathogenesis.
Collapse