Human immunodeficiency virus seroprevalence in community-based primary care practices, 1990-1992. A report from the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network

Community Engaged Leadership to Advance Health Equity and Build Healthier Communities

Health is a human right. Equity in health implies that ideally everyone should have a fair opportunity to attain their full health potential and, more pragmatically, that no one should be disadvantaged from achieving this potential. Addressing the multi-faceted health needs of ethnically and culturally diverse individuals in the United States is a complex issue that requires inventive strategies to reduce risk factors and buttress protective factors to promote greater well-being among individuals, families, and communities. With growing diversity concerning various ethnicities and nationalities; and with significant changes in the constellation of multiple of risk factors that can influence health outcomes, it is imperative that we delineate strategic efforts that encourage better access to primary care, focused community-based programs, multi-disciplinary clinical and translational research methodologies, and health policy advocacy initiatives that may improve individuals' longevity and quality of life.

HIV-related medical service use by rural/urban residents: a multistate perspective

OBJECTIVE

Geographic location may be related to the receipt of quality HIV health care services. Clinical outcomes and health care utilization were evaluated in rural, urban, and peri-urban patients seen at high-volume US urban-based HIV care sites.

METHODS

Zip codes for 8773 HIV patients followed in 2005 at seven HIV Research Network sites were categorized as rural (population <10,000), peri-urban (10,000-100,000), and urban (>100,000). Clinical and demographic characteristics, inpatient and outpatient (OP) utilization, AIDS-defining illness rates, receipt of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), opportunistic infection (OI) prophylaxis usage, and virologic suppression were compared among patients, using χ(2) tests for categorical variables, t-tests for means, and logistic regression for HAART utilization.

RESULTS

HIV-infected rural (n=170) and peri-urban (n=215) patients were less likely to be Black or Hispanic than urban HIV patients. Peri-urban subjects were more likely to report MSM as their HIV risk factor than rural or urban subjects. Age, gender, CD4 or HIV-RNA distribution, virologic suppression, HAART usage, or OI prophylaxis did not differ by geographic location. In multivariate analysis, rural and peri-urban patients were less likely to have four or more annual outpatient visits than urban patients. Rural patients were less likely to receive HAART if they were Black. Overall, geographic location (as defined by home zip code) did not affect receipt of HAART or OI prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

Although demographic and health care utilization differences were seen among rural, peri-urban, and urban HIV patients, most HIV outcomes and medication use were comparable across geographic areas. As with HIV care for urban-dwelling patients, areas for improvement for non-urban HIV patients include access to HAART among minorities and injection drug users.

Training family practice residents in HIV care

Although family physicians are likely to encounter patients at risk for or diagnosed with HIV, they rarely are trained in prevention and treatment techniques. From 1997 to 2000, the University of Minnesota developed and evaluated a longitudinal curriculum to train family practice residents in the prevention and comanagement of HIV disease. Five residency programs participated. The core curriculum was based on 18 teaching modules incorporated into the standard 3-year residency program and covers topics in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of HIV disease. Residents were encouraged to participate in elective rotations of HIV clinical care, service, and research, as well as attend a Sexual Attitude Reassessment Seminar. Baseline and postcurriculum attitude and knowledge surveys were performed and scores were compared before and after completion of the curriculum, as well as between the participants and a historical control group of residents who graduated in 1997. During the 3 academic years from 1997 to 2000, 214 residents participated in the study. Entering classes did not differ in baseline knowledge. Residents' knowledge about HIV disease, attitudes, confidence, and intention to treat HIV-positive patients improved (p < 0.01). The yearly number of HIV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests performed at the residency sites increased from 1145 to 1665 by the project's end. The HIV Curriculum Project provides a useful model of an interdisciplinary program for training family medicine residents in HIV/AIDS. The evaluation data provide an assessment of the curriculum itself and an important look at family practice residents' knowledge, attitudes, and performance related to HIV over time.