Freud's physician-assisted death

The adult suicide-prone patient: a review of the medical literature and implications for oral and maxillofacial surgeons

PURPOSE

Suicide is the 11th most common cause of death among American adults. Some individuals who commit suicide may have been treated by oral and maxillofacial surgeons in the days preceding the event. Because suicide often is preventable, in this report we review methods that are useful in identifying individuals at risk of imminent suicide and give suggestions for obtaining interventional assistance.

METHODS

A Medline search using the key terms "suicide," "adult," and "oral surgery" was conducted. Articles selected were published in peer-reviewed journals.

RESULTS

Individuals who have told their surgeon they have no further reason to live, have developed a suicide plan, have secured a lethal device, and have previously made such an attempt are at extreme risk and require immediate intervention. Additional risk factors include being white, aged older than 45 years, and unemployed; living alone, with poor social supports; having a current mental illness or history of mental illness, including substance abuse; and having a family history of suicide. Specialty-specific patients at highest risk are those treated for oral cancer and cosmetic issues and those with adverse surgical outcomes. With regard to assessment of these individuals, the modified SAD PERSONS acronym can assist surgeons in documenting the presence of major risk factors associated with adult suicide and in facilitating communication with emergency personnel.

CONCLUSIONS

Suicide is a potentially preventable public health problem. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons can be key in elucidating clinically significant suicide potential in their patients and referring them for timely intervention.

Psychiatric evaluation of death-hastening requests. Lessons from dialysis discontinuation

The authors aim to facilitate the psychiatric evaluation of death-hastening decisions, such as cessation of life-support treatment or physician-assisted suicide, by deriving principles for evaluating patients from a literature review and a recently completed prospective study on dialysis discontinuation conducted by consultation psychiatrists. Factors are delineated and suggestions are provided for the evaluation of requests to accelerate dying. Included are the authors' method for determining major depression in the context of terminal illness and their "vector analysis" in assessing patient requests to stop dialysis. As our society heatedly examines the care provided to the terminally ill, psychiatry also needs to reconsider whether actions that foreshorten life can be normative and permissible. Familiarity with competency, psychiatric diagnosis, and ease in communication and negotiation between patient, family, and staff are resources that psychiatrists can bring to these complicated assessments. Challenging areas include diagnosing depression, establishing the adequacy of palliative care, and appreciating issues related to personality features, family dynamics, and ethnic differences.