Current Updates in Rectal Infusion of Fluids and Medications

Purpose of Review

Rectal infusion is a feasible alternative for the immediate administration of medication and fluids when intravenous access is delayed, contraindicated, or unnecessary. Advances in medical device technology have made rectal infusion more practical and easier for medical care providers, and more comfortable for patients. This paper briefly reviews the history of therapeutic rectal infusion, including recent improvements in technology and the existing evidence for the use of this technique.

Recent Findings

While ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous (PIV) access techniques and other alternatives to landmark-based PIV catheter insertion have recently improved the ability of providers to overcome challenges related to difficult vascular access (DVA), these challenges are increasingly affecting patient outcomes, emergency department throughput, and the cost of medical care. In recent years, waves of parenteral drug, fluid, and supply shortages have affected hospitals. Concurrently, advances in rectal infusion technology have made rectal infusion easier, more comfortable, and more cost-effective than many parenteral options.

Summary

The infusion of resuscitative fluids and medications via the rectal route has previously fallen out of favor due to concurrent improvements in IV access devices. However, this technique demonstrates the potential for a reemergence considering the current challenges facing healthcare providers and systems. Improvements in rectal infusion devices, coupled with an aging population, increased incidence of DVA, shortages in parenteral drugs, fluids, supplies and skilled staff, and the need for care improvements in the post-acute setting have contributed to a greater need for easy, safe and effective alternatives to IV infusion.

Metoclopramide nasal spray for management of symptoms of acute and recurrent diabetic gastroparesis in adults

Introduction: Gastroparesis (GP) is characterized by delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. About 75% of GP patients are females. Diabetes and idiopathic are the two commonest etiologies of GP. Up to two-thirds of the GP patients do not have significant symptom responses to medical therapies, and there is a paucity of available oral prokinetic agents with only one medication approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this indication. The oral and parenteral formulations of metoclopramide were FDA approved in 1979 to treat symptoms of acute and recurrent diabetic GP. Now, more than 40 years later, a nasal preparation of metoclopramide (Gimoti^TM) was approved in June 2020 for the same indication.Areas covered: PubMed search using the keywords 'nasal metoclopramide' and 'diabetic gastroparesis.' This article aims to provide a concise review of the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of nasal metoclopramide.Expert opinion: The nasal formulation can be systemically absorbed without relying on the passage through a poorly emptying stomach, thus assuring the delivery of a therapeutic dose of metoclopramide, even during episodes of vomiting. Hence, metoclopramide nasal spray has the potential to be used during an acute flare, potentially avoiding hospitalizations.

Diabetic Gastroparesis

This review covers the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and management of diabetic gastroparesis, and more broadly diabetic gastroenteropathy, which encompasses all the gastrointestinal manifestations of diabetes mellitus. Up to 50% of patients with type 1 and type 2 DM and suboptimal glycemic control have delayed gastric emptying (GE), which can be documented with scintigraphy, 13C breath tests, or a wireless motility capsule; the remainder have normal or rapid GE. Many patients with delayed GE are asymptomatic; others have dyspepsia (i.e., mild to moderate indigestion, with or without a mild delay in GE) or gastroparesis, which is a syndrome characterized by moderate to severe upper gastrointestinal symptoms and delayed GE that suggest, but are not accompanied by, gastric outlet obstruction. Gastroparesis can markedly impair quality of life, and up to 50% of patients have significant anxiety and/or depression. Often the distinction between dyspepsia and gastroparesis is based on clinical judgement rather than established criteria. Hyperglycemia, autonomic neuropathy, and enteric neuromuscular inflammation and injury are implicated in the pathogenesis of delayed GE. Alternatively, there are limited data to suggest that delayed GE may affect glycemic control. The management of diabetic gastroparesis is guided by the severity of symptoms, the magnitude of delayed GE, and the nutritional status. Initial options include dietary modifications, supplemental oral nutrition, and antiemetic and prokinetic medications. Patients with more severe symptoms may require a venting gastrostomy or jejunostomy and/or gastric electrical stimulation. Promising newer therapeutic approaches include ghrelin receptor agonists and selective 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor agonists.