Modification of Parkinson's disease by long-term levodopa treatment

The Added Benefit of Opicapone When Used Early in Parkinson's Disease Patients With Levodopa-Induced Motor Fluctuations: A Post-hoc Analysis of BIPARK-I and -II

Introduction: Opicapone (OPC) was efficacious in reducing OFF-time in two pivotal trials in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and end-of-dose motor fluctuations (BIPARK-I and -II). Post-hoc analyses of these trials evaluated the efficacy of OPC following pre-defined segmentation of the wide spectrum of motor fluctuations in PD.

Methods: Data from matching treatment arms in BIPARK-I and -II were combined for the placebo (PLC) and OPC 50-mg groups, and exploratory post-hoc analyses were performed to investigate the efficacy of OPC 50 mg vs. PLC in subgroups of patients who were in “earlier” vs. “later” stages of both their disease course (e.g., duration of PD <6 years vs. ≥6 years) and levodopa treatment pathway (e.g., number of daily levodopa intakes <4 vs. ≥4). Efficacy variables included changes from baseline in absolute OFF-time and total ON-time.

Results: The Full Analysis Set included 517 patients (PLC, n = 255; OPC 50 mg, n = 262). OPC 50 mg was significantly more effective than PLC in reducing OFF-time and increasing ON-time in the majority of subgroup analyses (p < 0.05). Moreover, patients in “earlier” stages of both their disease course and levodopa treatment pathway experienced numerically greater efficacy when using OPC 50 mg, in comparison with those in “later” stages.

Conclusion: OPC 50 mg was efficacious over the whole trajectory of motor fluctuation evolution in PD patients. There was also a signal for enhanced efficacy in patients who were earlier vs. later in their disease course and levodopa treatment pathway.

An update on the management of juvenile and young-onset Parkinson’s disease

Early-onset Parkinson’s disease (PD) denotes onset of the disease below the age of 40 years. Patients tend to have a slower disease progression, an increased rate of dystonia, an increased rate of dyskinesias in response to L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine and a lower rate of dementia compared with those in late-onset PD. Early-onset PD patients may experience more social and psychosocial conflict compared with late-onset patients and these factors would contribute to greater impairment of quality of life. Unemployment due to disability or early retirement may be causes for these conflicts. We have to take these factors into account whenever we institute drug therapy in early-onset PD. There is no randomized controlled study on early-onset PD; however, we may make a reasonable decision by considering the data on PD in general and clinical characteristics of early-onset patients. The management of motor and non-motor symptoms of early-onset PD patients is reviewed here.

When should levodopa therapy be initiated in patients with Parkinson's disease?

Levodopa is available in three forms: immediate-release, orally disintegrating and sustained-release tablets. Levodopa is metabolised in the gastrointestinal tract, kidney and liver by aromatic acid dopa decarboxylase using pyridoxine as a cofactor. Approximately 70-80% of the dose is eliminated in the urine. Central conversion of levodopa to dopamine likely occurs at surviving dopaminergic terminals and at serotonergic and adrenergic nerve terminals that contain decarboxylase. Dopamine is metabolised by catechol-O-methyltransferase and monoamine oxidase. The major metabolites of dopamine are homovanillic acid and dihydroxyphenylacetic acid. Levodopa remains the most efficacious pharmacological treatment for the symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Results of current levodopa trials suggest that treatment with levodopa at the onset of disease provides superior motor and functional control compared with dopamine receptor agonists. Moreover, levodopa is generally better tolerated with a lower incidence of gastrointestinal and neuropsychiatric adverse effects. The debate over the role of levodopa in the treatment of PD is fuelled by the results of in vitro studies that show generation of free radicals by levodopa and its toxic effects on cell cultures. Levodopa has also consistently been shown to produce motor fluctuations (in particular dyskinesias) sooner than has been observed in PD patients, especially younger patients, given dopamine agonists initially. However, the cumulative body of knowledge thus far does not show definitive evidence that levodopa is neurotoxic to parkinsonian patients. In older PD patients with lesser risk of motor fluctuations, levodopa may be used initially, and perhaps solely, in demented PD patients and those at higher risk of developing neuropsychiatric adverse effects. In young parkinsonian patients with mild motor dysfunction, use of levodopa may be delayed or the dosage minimised. However, because of levodopa's superior efficacy, when a rapid and sustained symptomatic improvement is required because of significant motor disability, levodopa may be used as the first-line agent regardless of age.

A new look at levodopa based on the ELLDOPA study

Levodopa has been the gold standard for Parkinson's disease (PD) therapy since it was successfully introduced in 1967. But in the years since then, after recognizing that levodopa often leads to the motor complications of wearing-off and dyskinesias, there have been debates among clinicians as to when levodopa therapy should be started. Delaying therapy was advocated for the purpose of delaying the development of these motor complications. This became more popular as the dopamine agonists became available. Although less potent than levodopa in ameliorating the symptoms of PD, they were much less likely to produce the unwanted motor complications, even though they had their own adverse effects. When it was recognized that dopamine, itself, might be a factor leading to the death of dopaminergic neurons through its contributing to the formation of oxyradicals, a new concern arose, namely that levodopa, through its conversion to brain dopamine, might add to the existing oxidative stress and possibly enhance neurodegeneration of dopaminergic neurons. Though widely debated and without definite evidence, this possibility was sufficient to make some clinicians have further reason to delay the start of levodopa therapy. The ELLDOPA study was created to test this hypothesis. The clinical component of the study failed to find an enhancement of PD symptoms after levodopa was withdrawn following 40 weeks of levodopa therapy. Rather, the clinical results indicated that the symptoms had progressed much less than placebo, and in a dose-response manner. This suggests that levodopa may actually have neuroprotective properties. The uncertainty that a 2-week withdrawal of levodopa may not have entirely eliminated its symptomatic benefit and the discordant results of the neuroimaging component of the ELLDOPA study have created even more uncertainty that levodopa is neuroprotective. A survey of neurologists who treat PD patients showed that the vast majority of these clinicians do not believe levodopa is neuroprotective, and they remain concerned about the drug's likelihood of inducing motor complications. Thus, the ELLDOPA study failed to change the treating pattern of PD, and the clinicians require more convincing evidence of either neuroprotection or neurotoxicity of levodopa before they would alter their treatment approach.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Changes During the First Four Years of Levodopa Treatment in Parkinson’s Disease

The purpose of this analysis is to describe how levodopa pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters change over the first 4 years of long-term levodopa treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease. Twenty previously untreated Parkinsonian patients were admitted to the general clinical research center (GCRC) for 4 days at the beginning of long-term levodopa therapy and 6, 12, 24 and 48 months later. On each GCRC admission, patients received a 2 hr IV infusion of levodopa on day 1 and day 4 with no oral levodopa between the infusions. After the first GCRC admission patients were treated with oral levodopa dosed for optimal control of Parkinsonism. Motor function was measured by finger tapping rate. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model incorporating 3 effect compartments was used to fit the individual plasma levodopa concentrations and tapping rates. Motor function before the first levodopa infusion (E0(1)) improved over the first 20 months and subsequently returned to the initial baseline at the start of the study. A similar pattern was seen in motor function before the second infusion (E0(2)) after the 3 days levodopa withdrawal, with a decline predicted to fall below the initial baseline at the start of the study by 6 years. Eight patients showed an increase in maximum tapping rate with levodopa (E(max)) approaching a steady state after 16 months. Ten patients showed an increase in E(max) with a peak at 31 months. One patient showed a linear decrease and another patient did not change over the 48 months. Longitudinal progress models were used to describe the time course of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters over 4 years. Peak treatment benefit, defined as the difference between E(max) and E0(1) or E0(2) (D(max)1 or D(max)2), increased with time particularly after the 3-day levodopa withdrawal. Deterioration of pre-dose motor function (E0) as disease progresses coupled with a greater amplitude of response due to levodopa (D(max)) could be a key factor contributing to motor fluctuations associated with long-term levodopa treatment.

Parkinson's Disease: Initial Treatment with Levodopa or Dopamine Agonists

The question of whether to use levodopa (LD) or dopamine agonists as initial therapy in Parkinson's disease has been a controversy for nearly 20 years. There are several issues relating to this treatment regimen that may effect ones decision. Review of them results in the following conclusions: LD does not cause the onset of motor fluctuations and dyskinesia; it probably relates to disease progression. Tolerance does not develop with long-term LD therapy. LD is not toxic. LD decreases mortality in Parkinson's disease. Motor fluctuations can occur with dopamine-agonist monotherapy, but the actual frequency is as yet unknown. Dopamine agonists are not neuroprotective. Clinical trials have indicated that LD remains the most potent symptomatic therapeutic agent available. Dopamine agonists do provide some symptomatic relief when used alone in early Parkinson's disease. Standard preparations of LD have the same effect on early disease as controlled release preparations. Dopamine agonists cause less dyskinesia and fluctuations. These conclusions indicate that both drugs are effective symptomatic agents with their own positive and negative aspects. There is no incorrect choice. It is reasonable to start young onset patients (younger than 50 years of age) with an agonist, because they seem to be more prone to develop motor fluctuations and dyskinesia. However, if employment is in jeopardy then LD may be needed. Because agonists cause more hallucinations, freezing, and somnolence, problems of particular relevance to the elderly (older than 70 years), then LD would be the best agent for older onset patients. In general, but particularly for those falling in between these age groups, treatment should be individualized. In this time of cost effectiveness, LD remains the least expensive of these agents.

Levodopa or dopamine agonists, or deprenyl as initial treatment for Parkinson's disease. A randomized multicenter study

Objectives: levodopa improves the quality of life in parkinsonian patients, however long term response is compromised by the emergence of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias in previously untreated patients assigned to receive levodopa, a dopamine agonist or deprenyl.Thirty-five neurological departments in Italian hospitals participated in this randomized open trial. Patients with Parkinson's disease, who required the initiation of an effective antiparkinsonian treatment, were randomly assigned to receive levodopa, dopamine agonists or deprenyl. The end-points were motor dyskinesias and motor fluctuations occurring in a median follow-up period of about 3years.After a median follow-up of 34months, motor fluctuations and dyskinesias were less frequent in patients assigned to a dopamine agonist or deprenyl than in patients assigned to levodopa (relative risk [RR] 0.5, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.3-0.8, and RR=0.6, 95% CI 0.3-0.9, respectively), but dopamine agonists were less effective and less well tolerated than levodopa. The lower frequency of motor fluctuations in patients assigned to deprenyl was no longer statistically significant when prognostic predictors were considered in a multivariable analysis. Long-term mortality did not differ in the three arms of the study. Dopamine agonists and deprenyl can be considered as an alternative to levodopa for starting treatment in Parkinson's disease patients. However, on clinical grounds, only small advantages are expected over the traditional therapy initiation with levodopa.

Induction of apoptosis in catecholaminergic PC12 cells by L-DOPA. Implications for the treatment of Parkinson's disease

The hypothesis that L-DOPA therapy in Parkinson's disease may augment neuronal damage and thus accelerate the progression of the disease remains controversial. In this study, we demonstrate that L-DOPA induces death of catecholaminergic cells in vitro via an active program of apoptosis. Treatment of PC12 cells with clinically applicable concentrations of L-DOPA (25-100 microM) induced cell death via a mechanism which exhibited morphological and biochemical characteristics of apoptosis, including chromatin condensation, membrane blebbing, and internucleosomal DNA fragmentation. L-DOPA-induced apoptosis was cell and drug-type specific. Toxicity is an intrinsic property of the drug molecule since it was not suppressed by inhibiting conversion of L-DOPA to dopamine. However, L-DOPA toxicity was inhibited by antioxidants, suggesting that activation of apoptosis is mediated by oxygen radicals. Our finding that L-DOPA-induced cell death in vitro occurs via apoptosis explains the lack of evidence supporting its toxicity in vivo, since apoptotic neurons are rapidly phagocytosed in vivo without causing damage to surrounding tissue. Furthermore, since apoptosis is an active cellular program which can be modulated, we suggest clinical approaches for decreasing L-DOPA toxicity, thus preventing acceleration of neuronal damage in Parkinson's disease.

A randomised controlled study comparing bromocriptine to which levodopa was later added, with levodopa alone in previously untreated patients with Parkinson's disease: a five year follow up

This pilot study was performed to compare the occurrence of long term motor complications in Parkinson's disease when the introduction of levodopa was delayed by an initial treatment with high doses of bromocriptine alone. The trial was a prospective randomised controlled study comparing 31 previously untreated patients with Parkinson's disease initially given bromocriptine alone to which levodopa was later added (group B/D) and 29 other previously untreated patients with Parkinson's disease immediately given levodopa alone (group D). The end point was the occurrence of the first motor complications (wearing off or dyskinesia). Group B/D patients received bromocriptine (52 (SEM 5) mg/day) for 2.7 years, to which levodopa was later added (471 (SEM 46) mg/day). Group D patients received a comparable dose of levodopa alone (569 (SEM 47) mg/day). Both had similar disability scores at the end of the study. Motor complications were fewer and appeared later in group B/D than in group D (56% after 4.9 (SEM 0.5) years of treatment v 90% after 2.7 (SEM 0.5) years, p < 0.01). Wearing off appeared later (p < 0.01) in group B/D (4.5 (SEM 0.6) years) than in group D (2.9 (SEM 0.6) years). Peak dose dyskinesia occurred less often in group B/D patients (three v 14 cases, p < 0.01). This study showed that a three year initial monotherapy with high doses of bromocriptine followed by addition of levodopa delayed the occurrence of long term motor complications usually found in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with levodopa alone from the beginning.

The biology and behaviour of intracerebral adrenal transplants in animals and man

The catecholamine containing chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla have recently been employed as intracerebral grafts in man and animals with lesions of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system. This review outlines the basic biology of the chromaffin cell with reference to its efficacy as a source of dopamine in the grafted state. This is followed by an evaluation of the use of these grafts in experimentally lesioned animals and in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Dyskinesia, antipsychotic-drug exposure and risk factors in a developmentally-disabled population

The relation between antipsychotic drug (APD) exposure and the prevalence of dyskinesia (DK) was examined in a large, developmentally-disabled (DD) population. Using qualitative data in a cross-sectional, retrospective design, the drug-exposed group was systematically compared with a non-drug-exposed group, controlling for age and gender. When the population was evaluated with no regard to APD-exposure, age and female gender were significant risk factors, as in many prior studies. When APD-exposure was considered, it proved to be a complex variable dependent on the recency of exposure to APD, and the outcome depended on the method of analysis: when APD-exposure was considered as a binomial variable (yes/no), the relationship between APD and DK was not significant; when APD-exposure was controlled for recency of exposure, however, a significant relationship between APD and DK was demonstrated (p less than 0.01) although the relationship accounted for less than 3% of the variance. Analysis of the relation between DK-prevalence and recency-of-APD-exposure revealed a pattern of diminished prevalence during APD use and increased prevalence during early withdrawal.

Transplant-induced recovery from 6-OHDA lesions of the nigrostriatal dopamineneurones in mice

Attempts to reconstruct the damaged nigrostriatal pathway in experimental models of Parkinson's disease have thus far been carried out in animals with neurotoxically induced dopamine deficiency. Our study established that unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesions of the nigrostriatal dopamine (DA) neurons produced a well-characterized functional asymmetry in the behaviour of the C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice. The intraperitoneal administration of methamphetamine induced ipsilateral rotation at 7-20 turns/min 1 x 10(6) syngenic DA-rich cells of embryonic ventral mesencephalon were stereotaxically transplanted in the caudate-putamen. A complete recovery of methamphetamine-induced rotational response was produced around the 60th day after the syngenic cell suspension graft. And a complete compensation of the rotational response was also brought about with the DA-rich cells from embryonic ventral mesencephalon (crown-rump length; 10-13 mm) of allogenic C3H/HeN (H-2k) mice. The FACS IV analysis revealed no H-2 (Kk and Iak) antigens before transplantation of these embryonic cells. Immunohistochemistry showed that the dopaminergic fibers had grown predominantly into the ipsilateral caudate-putamen. These results provide evidence of integration of syngenic and allogenic grafts and host tissue. And the immunological response in the transplanted brain are under investigation.

The computer and stereotactic surgery in neurological surgery

The technical aspects, current uses, and future clinical applications of stereotactic surgery and three-dimensional imaging in neurological surgery are reviewed.