Herpes simplex keratitis in a developing country. Natural history and treatment of epithelial ulcers in Tunisia

The immunobiology of corneal HSV-1 infection and herpetic stromal keratitis

SUMMARYHuman alphaherpesvirus 1 (HSV-1) is a highly successful neurotropic pathogen that primarily infects the epithelial cells lining the orofacial mucosa. After primary lytic replication in the oral, ocular, and nasal mucosal epithelial cells, HSV-1 establishes life-long latency in neurons within the trigeminal ganglion. Patients with compromised immune systems experience frequent reactivation of HSV-1 from latency, leading to virus entry in the sensory neurons, followed by anterograde transport and lytic replication at the innervated mucosal epithelial surface. Although recurrent infection of the corneal mucosal surface is rare, it can result in a chronic immuno-inflammatory condition called herpetic stromal keratitis (HSK). HSK leads to gradual vision loss and can cause permanent blindness in severe untreated cases. Currently, there is no cure or successful vaccine to prevent latent or recurrent HSV-1 infections, posing a significant clinical challenge to managing HSK and preventing vision loss. The conventional clinical management of HSK primarily relies on anti-virals to suppress HSV-1 replication, anti-inflammatory drugs (such as corticosteroids) to provide symptomatic relief from pain and inflammation, and surgical interventions in more severe cases to replace damaged cornea. However, each clinical treatment strategy has limitations, such as local and systemic drug toxicities and the emergence of anti-viral-resistant HSV-1 strains. In this review, we summarize the factors and immune cells involved in HSK pathogenesis and highlight alternate therapeutic strategies for successful clinical management of HSK. We also discuss the therapeutic potential of immunoregulatory cytokines and immunometabolism modulators as promising HSK therapies against emerging anti-viral-resistant HSV-1 strains.

Herpes simplex virus keratitis: electronic medical records driven big data analytics report from a tertiary eye institute of South India

OBJECTIVE

To describe the demographics and clinical profile of Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) Keratitis in patients presenting to a multi-tier ophthalmology hospital network in South India.

METHODS

We have reviewed the medical records of all patients having a clinical diagnosis of any form of HSV keratitis, seen between May 2012 and August 2020 across the L V Prasad Eye Institute network. All the further analyses of the groups were performed using the keywords used for making the diagnosis of HSV keratitis and the data were collected from the electronic medical record system.

RESULTS

There were a total of 8308 (N = 8897 eyes) patients. Male: female ratio was 5368 (64.61%):2940 (35.39%). Unilateral involvement was in 7719 (92.91%) patients. The most common age group affected was between the third to fifth decades of life with 1544 (18.58%). 3708 (1.68%) eyes had mild visual impairment (< 20/70) while the rest of them had moderate to severe visual impairment as observed mainly (p ≤ 0.01) in Necrotizing stromal keratitis. 7314 (82.21%) eyes had normal intraocular pressure (10-21 mm Hg) while raised most commonly in keratouveitis (P ≤ 0.01). Epithelial Keratitis, Immune Stromal Keratitis, Endotheliitis, Neurotrophic keratopathy and Keratouveitis were observed in 1875 (17.22%) eyes, 5430 (61.03%) eyes, in 129(1.45%) eyes, 1188 (13.35%) eyes, 148 (1.66%) eyes and 256 (2.88%) eyes respectively.

CONCLUSION

Based on our institute-based data, the most common type of HSV keratitis is Immune stromal keratitis followed by epithelial keratitis. Although not representative of the general population, this data provide useful insights related to HSV keratitis from India.

INCIDENCE OF HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS KERATITIS AND OTHER OCULAR DISEASE: GLOBAL REVIEW AND ESTIMATES

Purpose: We aimed to review available data on the incidence of herpes simplex virus (HSV) keratitis and other HSV ocular disease and to estimate the global burden of HSV ocular disease. Methods: We searched Medline and Embase databases to October 2020 for studies reporting on the incidence of HSV ocular disease. Study quality was evaluated using a four-point checklist. Pooled estimates were applied to 2016 population data to estimate global HSV ocular disease burden. Numbers with uniocular vision impairment (any visual acuity <6/12) were estimated by applying published risks to case numbers. Results: Fourteen studies had incidence data; seven met our quality criteria. In 2016, an estimated 1.7 (95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.0–3.0) million people had HSV keratitis, based on a pooled incidence of 24.0 (95% CI 14.0–41.0; N = 2; I² = 97.7%) per 100,000 person-years. The majority had epithelial keratitis (pooled incidence 16.1 per 100,000; 95% CI 11.6–22.3; N = 3; I² = 92.6%). Available studies were few and limited to the USA and Europe. Data were even more limited for HSV uveitis and retinitis, although these conditions may collectively contribute a further >0.1 million cases. Based on global incidence, some 230,000 people may have newly acquired uniocular vision impairment associated with HSV keratitis in 2016. Conclusion: Over 1.8 million people may have herpetic eye disease annually. Preventing HSV infection could therefore have an important impact on eye health. Herpetic eye disease burden is likely to have been underestimated, as many settings outside of the USA and Europe have higher HSV-1 prevalence and poorer access to treatment.

Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis

BACKGROUND

Eye disease due to herpes simplex virus (HSV) commonly presents as epithelial keratitis which, though usually self-limiting, may persist or progress without treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the relative effectiveness of antiviral agents, interferon, and corneal debridement in the treatment of HSV epithelial keratitis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (2014, Issue 12), PubMed (January 1946 to 31 December 2014), EMBASE (January 1980 to 31 December 2014), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS) (January 1982 to 31 December 2014), System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe (OpenGrey) (January 1995 to 31 December 2014), BIOSIS (January 1926 to 5 May 2014), Scopus (January 1966 to 31 December 2014), Japan Science and Technology Institute (J-Global) (January 1975 to 31 December 2014), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) (January 1979 to 31 December 2014), British Library's Electronic Table of Contents (Zetoc) (January 1993 to 7 May 2014). We looked for trials listed on the the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov), the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en), Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (www.fda.gov/), National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (www.

EVIDENCE

nhs.uk) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) (www.ema.europa.eu/ema/) as of 31 December 2014. There were no language or date restrictions in the search for trials. We also culled literature digests and conference proceedings as of 15 April 2014. There were no language or date restrictions in the search for trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of HSV dendritic or geographic epithelial keratitis were included that reported the proportion of eyes healed at one week, two weeks, or both after enrolment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We tabulated data on study characteristics, risk of bias, and outcomes and used direct comparisons to estimate a risk ratio (RR) and, when feasible, a hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed by an inconsistency index. A multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis consolidated direct and indirect comparisons of relative healing at 14 days.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred thirty-seven studies involving 8333 eyes met the inclusion criteria. Placebo-controlled studies were heterogeneous in comparison with idoxuridine (RR 1.74; 95% CI 1.03 to 2.91) and few in number for vidarabine (RR 1.81; 95% CI 1.09 to 3.01), interferon (RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.64), and debridement. Vidarabine (RR 1.13; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.25), trifluridine (RR 1.30; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.43), acyclovir (RR 1.23; 95% CI 1.14 to 1.34), and brivudine (RR 1.34; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.51) were more effective than idoxuridine. Trifluridine (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.32) and acyclovir (RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.19) were more effective than vidarabine. No significant differences in healing emerged among trifluridine, acyclovir, brivudine, and foscarnet although few studies compared brivudine or foscarnet with other antivirals. Any potential advantage of ganciclovir compared to acyclovir was mitigated by study heterogeneity and possible publication bias. Only one study evaluated the joint use of two topical antivirals. In a limited number of studies, oral acyclovir (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.07) or the combination of oral acyclovir with a topical antiviral (RR 1.36; 95% CI 0.68 to 2.74) appeared as effective as a single topical antiviral agent. Compared to topical antiviral monotherapy, the combination of an antiviral with either interferon or debridement had inconsistent effects on expediting healing and improving outcome.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Placebo-controlled studies of HSV epithelial keratitis are limited to superseded interventions. Trifluridine and acyclovir are more effective than idoxuridine or vidarabine and similar in therapeutic effectiveness. Brivudine and foscarnet do not substantially differ in effectiveness from trifluridine or acyclovir. Ganciclovir is at least as effective as acyclovir. The addition of interferon to a nucleoside antiviral agent and the combination of debridement with antiviral treatment need to be further assessed to substantiate any possible advantage in healing.

Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis

BACKGROUND

Eye disease due to herpes simplex virus (HSV) commonly presents as epithelial keratitis.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the relative effectiveness of antiviral agents, interferon, and corneal débridement in the treatment of acute HSV epithelial keratitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 4), MEDLINE (January 1950 to October 2010), EMBASE (January 1980 to October 2010), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) (January 1982 to October 2010), Zetoc (British Library's Electronic Table of Contents), System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe (openSIGLE), Biosciences Information Service (BIOSIS), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov), Japan Information Center of Science and Technology (JICST-EPlus), and China Academic Journals database (CAJ) via China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) with citations confirmed using China/Asia On Demand (COAD). There were no language or date restrictions in the search for trials. All databases except CNKI and COAD were last searched on 27 October 2010, CNKI and COAD were searched on 1 April 2010. We also searched literature digests, conference proceedings and reference lists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Of 152 eligible studies,106 comparative treatment trials involving 5872 eyes with dendritic or geographic epithelial keratitis were analysed for corneal healing over two weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Interventions were compared at 14 days after trial enrolment by calculating a risk ratio (RR) that was adjusted with indirect RR, assessed by an inconsistency index (I(2) ) and supplemented by a seven-day RR and a hazard ratio (HR).

MAIN RESULTS

Idoxuridine, though uncertainly better in healing outcome than control because of few trials with 14-day follow up, allowed earlier corneal re-epithelialisation. Vidarabine resulted in a significantly better outcome than placebo in one trial (RR 1.96; 95% CI 1.10 to 3.49). Compared to idoxuridine, in combined direct and indirect analyses, vidarabine (RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.19), trifluridine (RR 1.31; 95% CI 1.20 to 1.42), acyclovir (RR 1.23; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.31), brivudine (RR 1.38; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.61), and ganciclovir (RR 1.40; 95% CI 1.25 to 1.57) were significantly more effective. Trifluridine (RR 1.12; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.21) and acyclovir (RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.19) appeared more effective than vidarabine. No significant differences were found in comparisons between acyclovir, trifluridine and brivudine. The comparison of ganciclovir to acyclovir was limited by heterogeneity and possible publication bias. The joint use of two topical antivirals (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.12) and the use of oral acyclovir alone (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.07) or combined with a topical antiviral (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.17) appeared as effective as topical antiviral therapy. Compared to antiviral monotherapy, the combination of an antiviral with interferon (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.07) or with débridement (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.14) did not yield significantly better outcomes but may have accelerated healing. The corneal epithelial healing outcome was improved when antiviral therapy was added to débridement (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.42).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Trifluridine and acyclovir are more effective than idoxuridine or vidarabine, and similar in therapeutic effectiveness. Brivudine and ganciclovir are at least as effective as acyclovir. While not improving outcome, the combination of interferon and an antiviral agent may speed healing. The effectiveness of corneal epithelial débridement is improved by an antiviral agent.

Keratitis in children as seen in a tertiary hospital in Africa

BACKGROUND

Blindness studies have shown that keratitis complicated by the use of traditional eye medications is a major factor of childhood blindness in developing countries. Most cases of such keratitis were presumably due to nutritional causes or bacterial infection. The patterns of outcome that are seen in hospitals may be different.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical types of keratitis seen in children at a tertiary hospital and compare with other reports.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted using the records of children who presented with keratitis to the eye unit of the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria, over a three-year period from January 2003 to December 2005. Information obtained were the demographic data, the etiological type of keratitis and visual outcome of management.

RESULT

Ninety-five patients with keratitis seen during this three-year period were children. Of these, 47 (49.5%) patients had presumed herpes simplex keratitis; 78.9% of children with herpes simplex keratitis presented with combined epithelial and stromal disease; 21 (22.1%) had keratitis that was associated with a recent measles infection and protein calorie malnutrition. Fifteen (15.8%) had keratitis associated with phlyctenular keratoconjunctivitis, eight (8.4%) patients had bacterial/fungal keratitis, while four (4.2%) had vernal ulcers. Both the right and left eyes were affected in 47.6% and 52.4% of cases, respectively. Bilateral keratitis occurred in eight of the children with measles, and six patients with herpes simplex keratitis. Fifty-nine eyes had visual acuity recorded after the keratitis healed. Of these, the visual outcome was very poor in six (20.0%) eyes with herpes simplex keratitis and eight (100%) eyes with bacterial/fungal keratitis. All eyes with suppurative keratitis associated with measles developed dense corneal scars or were perforated.

CONCLUSION

Herpes simplex keratitis was the leading cause of keratitis in children seen at this tertiary hospital, and clinical presentations do not differ from those reported in other populations. Very poor visual outcome was associated with all types of keratitis except those with herpes keratitis. Blindness studies may underrepresent the burden of herpes simplex keratitis in the location of this study.

Therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis

BACKGROUND

Many clinical trials have been performed on the acute treatment of dendritic epithelial keratitis. Surveys of ocular antiviral pharmacology and of herpes simplex virus (HSV) eye disease have evaluated different interventions, but a systematic review of all comparative clinical studies has not previously been undertaken.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to compare the effects of various therapeutic interventions for dendritic or geographic HSV epithelial keratitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials - CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) in The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2007), EMBASE (1980 to September 2007), LILACS (up to September 2007), SIGLE (1980 to September 2007), ZETOC (21 September 2007), BIOSIS (up to 2005), JICT-EPlus (up to 2005), Index Medicus (1960 to 1965), Excerpta Medica Ophthalmology (1960 to 1973), reference lists of primary reports and review articles, and conference proceedings pertaining to ocular virology.

SELECTION CRITERIA

This review included comparative clinical trials that assessed one-week or two-week healing rates of topical ophthalmic or oral antiviral agents and or physical or chemical debridement in people with active epithelial keratitis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The review author extracted data and assessed trial quality. Interventions were compared by the proportions of participants healed at seven days and at fourteen days after trial enrolment.

MAIN RESULTS

This review included data from 99 trials that randomised a total of 5363 participants. The topical application of vidarabine, trifluridine, acyclovir or ganciclovir resulted in a high proportion of participants healing within one week of treatment. Among these antiviral agents, no treatment emerged as significantly better for the therapy of dendritic epithelial keratitis. Insufficient placebo-controlled studies were available to assess debridement and other physical or physicochemical methods of treatment. Interferon monotherapy had a slight beneficial effect on dendritic epithelial keratitis but was not better than other antiviral agents. Interferon was very effective when combined with another antiviral agent such as trifluridine.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently available antiviral agents are effective and nearly equivalent. The combination of a nucleoside antiviral with either debridement or with interferon seems to speed healing. Future trials of the acute treatment of HSV epithelial keratitis must aim to achieve adequate statistical power for assessing the primary outcome of epithelial healing and should consider the effect of lesion size and other characteristics on treatment response.

Therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis

BACKGROUND

Many clinical trials have been performed on the acute treatment of dendritic epithelial keratitis. Surveys of ocular antiviral pharmacology and of herpes simplex virus (HSV) eye disease have evaluated different interventions, but a systematic review of all comparative clinical studies has not previously been undertaken.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to compare the effects of various therapeutic interventions for dendritic or geographic HSV epithelial keratitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials - CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) in The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2006, week 3), EMBASE (1980 to 2006, week 30), LILACS (up to August 2006), SIGLE (1980 to March 2005), ZETOC (1 August 2006), BIOSIS (up to 2005), JICT-EPlus (up to 2005), Index Medicus (1960 to 1965), Excerpta Medica Ophthalmology (1960 to 1973), reference lists of primary reports and review articles, and conference proceedings pertaining to ocular virology.

SELECTION CRITERIA

This review included comparative clinical trials that assessed one-week or two-week healing rates of topical ophthalmic or oral antiviral agents and or physical or chemical debridement in people with active epithelial keratitis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The review author extracted data and assessed trial quality. Interventions were compared by the proportions of participants healed at seven days and at fourteen days after trial enrolment.

MAIN RESULTS

This review included data from 98 trials that randomised a total of 5211 participants. Compared to idoxuridine, the topical application of vidarabine, trifluridine, or acyclovir resulted in a significantly greater proportion of participants healing within one week of treatment. Among these latter three antiviral agents, no treatment emerged as significantly better for the therapy of dendritic epithelial keratitis. Insufficient placebo-controlled studies were available to assess debridement and other physical or physicochemical methods of treatment. Interferon monotherapy had a slight beneficial effect on dendritic epithelial keratitis but was not better than other antiviral agents. Interferon was very effective when combined with another antiviral agent such as trifluridine.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently available antiviral agents are effective and nearly equivalent. The combination of a nucleoside antiviral with either debridement or with interferon seems to speed healing. Future trials of the acute treatment of HSV epithelial keratitis must aim to achieve adequate statistical power for assessing the primary outcome of epithelial healing and should consider the effect of lesion size and other characteristics on treatment response.

Efficacy of polyclonal antibodies for treatment of ocular herpes simplex infection

PURPOSE

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) can cause corneal infections in humans and lead to permanent scarring, loss of vision, and blindness. Current treatment of epithelial HSV keratitis consists of using antiviral DNA analogs. In this study, we used in vitro and in vivo models to evaluate the efficacy of six polyclonal antibodies to HSV recombinant surface glycoprotein D in treating ocular epithelial HSV.

METHODS

Confluent cultures of African Green monkey kidney fibroblasts (Vero cells) and normal 3-to 5-lb female New Zealand White rabbits were infected with HSV type 1, strain RE. In vitro virucidal and antiviral assays were performed, and the best of the compounds was chosen for the in vivo stage. Animals were carefully monitored until day 5 after HSV-1 inoculation, then arbitrarily divided into groups receiving, for 14 days, varying doses of: polyclonal antibodies four times a day, polyclonal antibodies three times a day, trifluorothymidine (current treatment of choice and the positive control) nine times a day, or 0.9% physiologic saline nine times a day. The animals were followed up in a masked fashion and carefully monitored for severity and resolution of the HSV infection by biomicroscopy (slit lamp) examination and viral cultures using standardized plaque assays.

RESULTS

All six of the compounds tested were effective in vitro, but one compound in particular, SP-510-50, was superior. It was used for the in vivo testing and showed antiviral efficacy in a dose-dependent manner, and at dosing four times a day, it was of comparable efficacy to trifluorothymidine (nine times a day).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that polyclonal antibodies to glycoprotein D appear to be effective antiviral agents in vitro and in vivo in a rabbit model of HSV-1 keratitis and show promise as a new antiviral treatment for ophthalmic use.

Advances in diagnosis and management of herpetic uveitis

Herpetic eye disease is common and is frequently associated with intraocular inflammation or uveitis. Despite recent advances in measuring anti-herpes virus antibodies and viral DNA in ocular fluids, diagnosis remains largely clinical. The two more common syndromes include anterior uveitis, often associated with keratitis, and the acute retinal necrosis (ARN) syndrome. Treatment is complex and requires careful monitoring to provide the appropriate balance of antiviral medication and corticosteroids. Long-term prophylaxis with oral antiviral agents may be required in selected patients to help prevent the vision-compromising complications associated with recurrences.

Virus infections of the eye

In reviewing the clinical features, diagnostic evaluations and therapies of the most common ocular viral infections we attempt to whet your appetite for attacking the numerous challenges in diagnosis and treatment of viral eye disease. The herpes viruses, HSV, VZV and CMV are the cause of significant ocular morbidity. HSV most commonly affects the cornea producing keratitis that can be recurrent and may lead to corneal clouding and neovascularisation. Manifestations can be purely infectious or immunological and treatment options must be tailored to the underlying pathophysiology. Herpes zoster ophthalmicus, caused by VZV infection of the first branch of the trigeminal nerve, produces a characteristic rash and can progress to keratitis and uveitis. HSV and VZV can cause retinitis in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals. There has been a significant increase in the incidence of CMV retinitis since the beginning of the AIDS epidemic. We review the numerous new treatments, diagnostic tests and treatment strategies which have been developed in response to this potentially blinding retinal infection. Adenovirus produces an epidemic conjunctivitis and epidemic keratoconjunctivitis which are severe and extremely contagious conjunctival infections. HIV, molluscum contagiosum, EBV and rubeola also cause ocular diseases which are described.Copyright 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Herpes simplex keratitis in renal transplant patients

Five out of 430 patients (1.16%) undergoing kidney transplantation developed an atypical clinical picture of herpetic dendritic keratitis within four weeks after surgery. It was manifested by multiple dendrites, located mainly in the corneal periphery or the limbus, developing in relatively uninflamed eyes. The response to acyclovir therapy was prolonged and took at least three weeks. Additionally, subepithelial infiltrates with ultimate scarring developed in all patients. Disciform keratopathy was not found. This clinical course is ascribed to the patients' immunosuppressed state.

Blunt spatula debridement and trifluorothymidine in epithelial herpetic keratitis

31 consecutive patients with laboratory proven epithelial herpetic keratitis were included in a prospective, controlled study evaluating combined blunt spatula debridement and trifluridine therapy versus trifluridine alone. A group of 20 patients treated by the combined method was compared in sequence with a group of 11 patients treated by trifluridine alone. Epithelial healing time was significantly shorter in the combined treatment group and treatment failures were less frequent. Blunt spatula debridement was well tolerated. Our findings tend to support the concept that combined treatment of herpetic epithelial keratitis by debridement and antiviral therapy is beneficial by shortening the course of epithelial lesions.

Acyclovir and debridement in the treatment of ulcerative herpetic keratitis

We treated 25 patients with dendritic keratitis with debridement and 3% acyclovir ointment and another 25 with acyclovir alone. The patients were randomly assigned to the two treatment groups. There were only minimal adverse effects in both groups. The combination of debridement and acyclovir produced a significantly more rapid healing rate than did acyclovir alone. Factors associated with prolonged healing time were duration of symptoms (longer than one week), length of the epithelial defect (greater than 4 mm), proximity of the defect to the corneoscleral limbus (less than 2 mm), and the presence of stromal inflammation.

Herpes simplex eye infections: clinical manifestations, pathogenesis and management

Herpes infection of the eye may be acquired as the patient's first exposure to the virus (primary infection) or as involvement of a new anatomical site (the eye) in a patient with previous HSV infection. In either case, patients with herpetic eye infection risk recurrent eye disease throughout their lives. The infective lesions of the corneal epithelium (dendritic and geographic ulcers) occasionally develop into noninfective indolent or trophic ulcers, particularly under the influence of cauterizing chemicals or corticosteroids. Inflammation of the corneal stroma may accompany herpetic epithelial lesions or occur independently. Stromal keratitis probably represents the host's immune response to viral antigens filtering down from epithelial lesions or from viral replication in stromal cells. The clinical manifestations of ocular HSV infection are reviewed, pathogenesis and possible pathways of the infection are analyzed, and some practical guidelines for management and prevention are presented.

The management of ocular herpesvirus infections

The many treatment methods in current use for every known complaint only seem to aggravate the difficulty of treating ocular herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections, which are generally self-limited in the immunocompetent host. The cornea is already a somewhat immune-deficient tissue since its lack of blood vessels separates it partially from the host, and treatment with glucocorticoids, which are immunosuppressive, increases the risk of damaging complications such as scarring, prolonged morbidity, bacterial or fungal superinfection, and the occasional corenal perforation. Accepted methods of treatment of specific lesions, are discussed, as are some methods that are not yet accepted, but which seem promising. Herpes zoster may result in scarring and significant loss of vision even without the use of glucocorticoids, the disease often manifesting itself in the already compromised host. The major complication is postherpetic neuralgia. None of the available treatment methods has been fully satisfactory, and every effort should be made to prevent eye lesions in patients with early infection of the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve. Stimulation of cellular immunity by various means appears to offer some new promise for control of the disease. Management of varicella, cytomegalovirus, and infectious mononucleosis are also discussed.