Outcomes in suction coagulator adenoidectomy

Adverse events related to suction electrocautery devices in adenotonsillectomy: Analysis of the MAUDE database

OBJECTIVE

To identify adverse events (AEs) related to suction electrocautery use during adenotonsillectomy.

METHODS

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was searched using the terms "suction cautery," "suction electrocautery," "suction Bovie," and "suction coagulator" from January 2014 to December 2023.

RESULTS

165 AE reports were gathered from the MAUDE database medical device reports (MDRs). 36 met inclusion criteria. Patient injuries were found in 22 (61.1 %) reports and device malfunction events were found in 14 (38.9 %) reports. All patient injuries were thermal burns (N = 22, 100 %). Location of burn injuries included the lip (N = 6, 27.3 %), oral commissure (N = 5, 22.7 %), and tongue (N = 4, 18.2 %). The most common cause of an AE was inadequate device insulation (N = 7, 19.4 %).

CONCLUSION

The suction electrocautery apparatus may malfunction and cause patient burn injuries. Device failures mainly result from inadequate device insulation, coagulation problems, and detachment of device components. Surgeons must be aware of these potential complications and counsel parents and patients regarding AEs.

Efficacy of Continuous Suctioning in Adenoidectomy Haemostasis-Clinical Study

Introduction: Adenoidectomy is often the first major surgical challenge for the child's haemostatic system, and controlling intraoperative bleeding can be a challenge for the surgeon. Different methods have been used intraoperatively by surgeons in order to enhance haemostasis. The cold air effect (continuous suctioning) has been used by some surgeons during adenoidectomy; however, no documentation of its haemostatic effect has been made. Objectives: Our prospective randomised controlled study enrolled a sample of 140 children undergoing adenoidectomy, and we studied the effect of continuous suctioning on the duration of haemostasis in paediatric adenoidectomy. Materials and Methods: We evaluated the effect of using continuous suctioning during haemostasis at the end of adenoidectomy procedures, comparing variables such as total surgery time, total haemostasis time, and intraoperative blood loss, between two groups: 70 adenoidectomy procedures where no continuous suctioning was used to enhance haemostasis versus the other 70 patients where continuous suctioning was the haemostatic method employed. RESULTS: After statistical analysis of the recorded data, we found that the total duration of adenoidectomy, the duration of haemostasis in adenoidectomy, and the intraoperative blood loss were significantly lower in patients in whom cold air was used for haemostasis. Intraoperative haemostasis failure (and consequent use of electrocautery for haemostasis) was more frequent in patients in whom no suctioning was used; as for the rates of postoperative primary bleeding after adenoidectomy, they were similar in both groups of patients, regardless of the technique used for haemostasis. Conclusions: The use of continuous suctioning during adenoidectomy haemostasis significantly shortens total surgical and haemostasis time, reduces intraoperative blood loss, and reduces the incidence of haemostasis failure (with the consequent need for bipolar electrocautery haemostasis).

Use and Abuse of Electrocautery in Adenoidectomy Hemostasis

Background and objectives: Bipolar electrocautery is commonly used to control bleeding after cold-instrument pediatric adenoidectomy, but the surgeon should be aware of the possible side effects. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study is to investigate the effects of bipolar electrocautery when used for bleeding control at the end of an adenoidectomy procedure. Materials and Methods: We evaluated the effect of electrocautery on postoperative pain, velopharyngeal insufficiency symptoms, postoperative nasal obstruction, and rhinorrhea in a group of 90 children undergoing adenoidectomy in our ENT department over a period of 3 months. Results: After statistically analyzing the data, we found that the duration of postoperative pain, the duration of rhinorrhea and nasal obstruction, and the duration of painkiller administration, as well as the velopharyngeal insufficiency symptoms, were significantly longer in patients in whom electrocautery was used for hemostasis. A significantly higher incidence of posterior neck pain and halitosis (oral malodor) was noted in the patients in whom electrocautery was used for adenoidectomy hemostasis. Conclusions: Bipolar electrocautery use should be limited during pediatric adenoidectomy hemostasis because of the possible side effects: longer postoperative pain, prolonged nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea and velopharyngeal insufficiency, and halitosis. We noted some side effects that were specific to electrocautery use during adenoidectomy: posterior neck pain and oral malodor. Acknowledging the risk for these symptoms can help to alleviate the anxiety of both the parents and the patients regarding the expected postoperative outcomes.

Evaluation of endoscopic assisted suction coagulation adenoidectomy versus traditional curettage technique

Background

Adenoidal hypertrophy is a common condition in children and can cause symptoms such as mouth breathing, nasal discharge, snoring, sleep apnea, and hyponasal speech. The curettage adenoidectomy has some disadvantages, especially the intranasal extension of the adenoid tissue that makes this technique inadequate. This study is conducted to evaluate and compare between assisted suction coagulation adenoidectomy and traditional curettage techniques.

Results

One hundred twenty-two patients with symptomatic adenoid hypertrophy such as nasal obstruction, snoring, and mouth breathing were included in our study. Patients underwent adenoidectomy either traditional curettage adenoidectomy (60 patients as group A) or endoscopic assisted suction coagulation adenoidectomy (62 patients as group B). Patients were scheduled for follow-up visits with respect to operative time, operative and postoperative complications. The mean age of groups A and B were 6.57+2.8 and 7+2.8 ranging from 3 to12 years. There was a statistically significant difference between groups as regard intraoperative blood loss, trauma, postoperative complications as neck stiffness and bad odor plus postoperative endoscopic and radiological grading after the operation.

Conclusions

Suction coagulation diathermy adenoidectomy is alternative to cold adenoidectomy with significantly fewer intraoperative complications such as blood loss and trauma of prevertebral muscle plus post-operative complications such as primary or secondary bleeding and rhinolalia aperta.

Cold versus hot adenoidectomy: A prospective, randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Adenoidectomy can be performed using the cold method (mainly adenoid curettes) or the hot method (suction diathermy). Both techniques have similar intra and postoperative outcomes. However, the long-term clinical outcome of improving sleep disorder symptoms has not been well established. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of hot method and cold method adenoidectomy one year following the surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, single-blinded study of children under age 16 years who underwent adenoidectomy during the years 2014-2017. Patients were randomized to hot or cold adenoidectomy techniques.

SETTING

A tertiary health care referral center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The final analysis included 58 children, mean age 5.9 years (range 1.2-15). The primary outcome was change in the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) scores one month and one year after surgery. The secondary outcome was complication rate.

RESULTS

Clinical and demographic parameters were similar between the patients in the hot method group (n = 30) and the cold method group (n = 28). Adenoid size and estimated bleeding were similar between the groups. At one month after surgery, PSQ score was improved by a mean + 0.31 in the hot method group compared to +0.32 in the cold method group (p = 0.54). Improvement in PSQ scores was greater following hot than cold adenoidectomy at one year after surgery (+0.31 points vs. +0.22 points, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Hot adenoidectomy is associated with better outcome than the cold technique, as reflected by PSQ scores one year after the surgery.

Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of a Novel Matrix Hemostatic Sealant in Children Undergoing Adenoidectomy

PROBLEM ADDRESSED: Floseal is a novel matrix hemostatic sealant composed of collagen-derived particles and topical bovine-derived thrombin. It is applied as a high-viscosity gel for hemostasis and has been clinically proven to control bleeding. This study is a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of Floseal sealant compared to traditional suction cautery hemostasis in children undergoing adenoidectomy.

METHODS AND MEASURES: Seventy patients (mean age 7.0 yrs, 45.7% male) with obstructive sleep apnea underwent traditional cold steel adenoidectomy with an adenoid curette and were then randomized to receive the hemostatic sealant (Floseal) or cautery to obtain hemostasis. Patients were crossed over to the other hemostatic technique if hemostasis was not achieved after more than 100 mL of blood loss or 15 minutes elapsed time. Objective data collected included time to hemostasis and blood loss during hemostasis. Visual analog scales (VAS) were used to record subjective data by the operating surgeon including bleeding following adenoid pack removal (0 = none, 3 = brisk) and ease of operation (1 = extremely easy, 6 = extremely difficult). Parents recorded diet on a journal and were contacted by phone at postoperative day 7 and questioned with regard to return to regular diet and use of narcotics.

RESULTS: Compared to patients in the cautery group (n = 35), Floseal patients (n = 35) had significantly shorter times to hemostasis (0.6 ± 1.3 minutes vs 9.5 ± 5.4 minutes (mean ± SD), P < 0.001), less blood loss (2.5 ± 9.2 mL vs 29.4 ± 27.1 mL, P < 0.001), less subjective bleeding (0.0 ± 0.6 vs 2.0 ± 0.7, (median 4-point VAS ± SD), P < 0.001), and subjectively easier operations (2.6 ± 1.0 vs 5.2 ± 1.0 (mean 6-point VAS ± SD), P < 0.001). Furthermore, Floseal patients returned to regular diet earlier (2.7 ± 0.7 vs 4.1 ± 0.5 days (mean ± SD), P < 0.001) and had less use of narcotics at 7 days postoperatively (40% vs 69%, P < 0.05). Lastly, three patients in the cautery group were crossed over to the Floseal group, but no Floseal subjects were crossed over to the cautery group. The retail cost of Floseal is $85. Operating room costs are estimated at $12/minute. Reducing the operative length by 8.9 minutes on average produces a cost savings of $106.80 per operation. There were no complications in either experimental group including postoperative hemorrhage, hospitalization, blood transfusion, or aspiration.

CONCLUSIONS: Floseal matrix hemostatic sealant is a safe, efficacious, easy, and cost-effective technique for obtaining hemostasis in children undergoing adenoidectomy. Limitations of the study include the fact that it is nonblinded, which does allow for some bias in the subjective data recorded. However, utilizing 4 different operating surgeons, 3 of whom were not affiliated with the study, minimized this.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY: This study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of a novel hemostatic sealant in children undergoing adenoidectomy. Floseal matrix hemostatic sealant can be used as a first-line hemostatic agent, and it is a good tool in the armamentarium of otolaryngologists who encounter significant bleeding following adenoidectomy.

Comparison of Transoral/Transnasal Endoscopic-Guided Adenoidectomy with Endoscopic Nasopharyngeal Inspection at the End of Curettage Adenoidectomy

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of transoral or transnasal endoscopic-guided adenoidectomy compared with endoscopic nasopharyngeal inspection at the end of curettage adenoidectomy. A prospective case series of patients who had adenoidectomy. A total of 27 girls and 34 boys (age range 2.5-18 years) in whom adenoidectomy with or without tonsillectomy procedure was planned were included in the study. The cases were divided into three groups. Group 1 Transoral endoscopic-guided adenoidectomy performed patients. Group 2 Transnasal endoscopic-guided adenoidectomy performed patients. Group 3 Transnasal endoscopic nasopharyngeal exploration performed at the end of the conventional curettage adenoidectomy. The study was completed on 61 children. Mean age and sex frequency were not significant different between the groups. Mean operative time were 11.6 ± 2.9, 15.6 ± 4.4 and 9.7 ± 2 min, respectively (p > 0.05). On the other hand, significant differences were observed in operative time between group 1 and group 2 (p < 0.05), and between group 2 and group 3 (p < 0.05). Transnasal endoscopic examination at the end of curettage adenoidectomy is an appropriate method to assess the residual adenoid tissue after conventional curettage adenoidectomy. Also, operative time of this method is shorter than transoral or transnasal endoscopic-guided adenoidectomy. We recommend transnasal endoscopic inspection in all patients after conventional curettage adenoidectomy.

Suction diathermy adenoidectomy performed in the district general hospital

BACKGROUND

Adenoidectomy is often carried out in children for conditions such as nasal obstruction, otitis media with effusion, and obstructive sleep apnoea. Traditionally, it is performed as a blind procedure with a St Clair Thomson curette. An acceptable alternative technique is suction diathermy adenoidectomy. This study aimed to ensure that the complication rate of this latter technique was within published rates and national guidelines.

METHOD

A retrospective case note review was conducted, and information regarding surgery, indications and complications was collected.

RESULTS

Post-operative haemorrhage was recorded for 2 of 121 patients (at days 10 and 11 post-operatively): 1 returned to the operating theatre and the other was managed conservatively. Two patients were diagnosed with infection post-operatively and managed with oral antibiotics. A further four patients re-presented with pain; in all cases, this was recorded as secondary to tonsillar fossa infection, rather than being pain related to adenoidectomy.

CONCLUSION

Given the rare but serious potential complications, the authors support National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidance, which recommends that only surgeons with specific training perform this technique. By using the standard procedures for clinical governance, it is possible to ensure safe practice of even little-used techniques.

A Comparison of Revision Adenoidectomy Rates Based on Techniques

Objective

No studies are available specifically comparing revision rates between suction coagulator and microdebrider-performed adenoidectomies. Our objective was to compare revision adenoidectomy rates between these instrument groups.

Study Design

Historical cohort study.

Setting

Patients included in this study had surgery at the Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital in Chicago, Illinois, from June 2007 through December 2011.

Subjects and Methods

The patients were divided into 2 groups based on technique of adenoidectomy used at the time of initial surgery and the regrowth rate analyzed.

Results

During the 4.5-year study period, the microdebrider was used in 4071 adenoidectomies, and 3328 cases were performed with suction coagulation. There was a revision rate of 0.84% (34 patients) for the microdebrider group. The rate was 1.50% (50 patients) for suction coagulation. This difference was found to be statistically significant on univariate analysis. The suction coagulator group had a younger mean age at initial surgery and a higher incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease. No difference in revision rates between the 2 groups was noted on multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Symptomatic regrowth of adenoid tissue occurs infrequently. Both suction coagulation and microdebrider methods are commonly used when performing adenoidectomies due to more consistent ease of use in removal of tissue. The incidence of regrowth likely relates to variables other than the technique used, as there was no difference in the regrowth rate between the 2 groups.

Suction cautery adenoidectomy (SCA): is the additional cost justified?

OBJECTIVES

Adenoidectomy is one of the oldest and most frequent ENT procedures. This study aimed to compare adenoidectomy using suction-cautery adenoidectomy (SCA) to curettage with respect to operative time, postoperative complications, and cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

The data for this retrospective case control study were retrieved from the Medical Records Department at one of the few medical centers that perform this technique in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The data for each case included the following: patient demographic features, type of procedure, time of operation, occurrence of any postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and cost of the procedure. To minimize the sources of variance in our data, all adenoidectomies were performed by the same consultant otolaryngologist, using either SCA or curettage.

RESULT

Of the 86 patients who underwent adenoidectomy in this study, SCA was performed in half of them (43) and curettage in the other half. The two groups were well matched with no significant group differences in either age or gender (p=0.2 and p=0.19, respectively). There was a significant reduction in operative time (p<0.001) in the SCA group. There were no cases of postoperative hemorrhage after SCA, but there was one case of hemorrhage in the curette group that required a 2nd surgery to control the bleeding. Regarding cost, there were additional profits of more than 700,000 SR (US$180,000) each month with SCA as compared to curettage.

CONCLUSIONS

The suction cautery technique was superior at reducing operative time, increasing cost-effectiveness and decreasing the risk of postoperative complications. Therefore, we suggest suction cautery as the most appropriate method for adenoidectomy.

Avoiding airway obstruction after pediatric adenotonsillectomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of a protocol designed to prevent post-adenotonsillectomy airway obstruction in small children with obstructive sleep apnea.

DESIGN

Computerized retrospective review of single surgeon case series.

SETTING

Tertiary children's medical center.

METHODS

Children with sleep study proven obstructive sleep apnea or children under the age of 3 years with clinically suspected obstructive sleep apnea were treated according to a protocol that included: (1) rapid bloodless tonsillectomy; (2) repeated release of the tonsillar retractor; (3) avoidance of uvular edema; (4) routine intra-operative intranasal oxymetazoline, and placement of nasal airway; (5) extended recovery room observation. Primary outcome measures were (1) avoidance of unexpected intensive care unit admission; (2) post-extubation pulmonary edema; (3) aspiration pneumonia.

RESULTS

During the period March 2004-August 2007, 864 children underwent adenotonsillectomy by a single surgeon-604 for the indication of obstructive sleep apnea or adenotonsillar hypertrophy with obstruction. Two hundred and ten were under the age of 3 years or had sleep study proven obstructive sleep apnea. There were two unexpected admissions to the pediatric intensive care unit for persistent upper airway obstruction-none required intubation. No child developed post-obstructive pulmonary edema. Three children were treated for infiltrates consistent with aspiration pneumonitis.

CONCLUSION

Most cases of post-extubation pulmonary edema and pneumonia can be avoided in young children and those with mild-to-moderate obstructive sleep apnea following a protocol that anticipates and avoids precipitating causes of upper airway obstruction.

Electrocautery adenoidectomy outcomes: A meta-analysis

Objective: Review the published literature regarding clinical outcomes of suction electrocautery adenoidectomy (ECA) in pediatric patients.

Data Source: The MEDLINE database was systematically reviewed for articles reporting on the use of ECA.

Review Methods: Each study was independently reviewed by each investigator. Inclusion criteria included English language, sample size greater than five, and presentation of extractable data regarding outcomes with ECA. Random-effects modeling was used to estimate summary outcomes.

Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The mean sample size was 276 patients with a grand mean age of 6.0 years. Random-effects modeling of intraoperative hemorrhage (4.1 cc vs 24.0 cc, 95 percent CI of difference = 16.5–23.1, P < 0.001) and operative time (10.0 minutes vs 18.4 minutes, 95 percent CI of difference = 0.82–2.90, P < 0.001) favored ECA vs curette adenoidectomy. Subjective success was reported in 95.0 percent (95% CI = 92.7%-97.3%, P < 0.001) of ECA patients with a grand mean of 5.8 months of follow-up. Adenoid regrowth was evaluated objectively (endoscopy or x ray) in only 116 of 2132 patients (5.4%), with an observed regrowth rate of 2.8 percent that (95% CI = 0%-5.5%, P = 0.052).

Conclusions: The preponderance of available evidence favors ECA vs curette adenoidectomy in terms of decreased intraoperative hemorrhage and operative time. Long-term outcome data for ECA are scarce but suggest a low regrowth and complication rate.

Gold Laser Versus Curettage Adenoidectomy: Incidence of Complications and Otorrhea After Concurrent Pressure-Equalization Tube Placement

OBJECTIVES

To measure the incidence of postoperative complications and otorrhea in patients undergoing Gold laser or curettage adenoidectomy with pressure-equalization (PE) tube placement.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective study of 100 patients, ages 8 to 48 months, undergoing Gold laser (n = 50) or curettage adenoidectomy (n = 50) and PE tube placement in a pediatric outpatient setting.

METHODS

Pediatric patients with chronic otitis media with effusion and adenoid hypertrophy after failure of medical management were included in the study. Adenoid size and middle ear status were recorded at surgery. The total adenoidectomy procedure time was recorded. All patients were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, and 4 months postoperatively. The incidence of nasal complications and otorrhea was recorded.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in age, race, sex, adenoid size, or middle ear status between groups. The laser group had a shorter procedure time (P = .001) and a lower incidence of otorrhea (P = .024). There was no difference in nasal complications between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The Gold laser adenoidectomy technique can be safely performed with PE tube placement and may offer advantages over the traditional curettage adenoidectomy technique.

Prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled study to compare two methods of performing adenoidectomy

OBJECTIVE

To compare adenoidectomy using suction-diathermy ablation to curettage adenoidectomy with respect to operative time and adenoid regrowth at 6 months after surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, single-blind, study to compare two methods of performing adenoidectomy. A group of 100 children, undergoing adenoidectomy alone or in combination with tonsillectomy, were randomized into two groups and underwent either suction diathermy or curettage adenoidectomy by a single surgeon.

SETTING

A tertiary care Paediatric Hospital.

METHOD

Indication for surgery, adenoidal size, duration of surgery and complications were recorded and compared. Six-month follow-up was conducted and adenoidal size and symptom status were recorded and compared. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel.

RESULTS

One hundred patients participated in this study and underwent adenoidectomy alone or adenotonsillectomy. Ninety-two patients returned for follow-up and 91 patients completed the study. The two treatment groups were well matched for age and gender. The main indications for both groups were snoring, nasal obstruction and obstructive sleep apnoea. For adenoidectomy alone there was no significant difference in duration of surgery between the curette and suction diathermy groups. When performing tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy together suction diathermy took significantly longer to complete than curettage (P<0.001). Overall 96% of patients' symptoms had either improved or resolved. The post-operative comparison at 6 months showed a significant difference in the residual adenoidal size between the two groups, the suction diathermy group being generally smaller than the curettage group.

CONCLUSIONS

Suction diathermy was better at reducing the adenoidal size 6 months after surgery. Although the difference in size was statistically significant it did not seem to be of clinical significance.

How we do it: Transoral suction diathermy adenoid ablation under direct vision using a 45 degree endoscope

Keypoints * Adenoid ablation using suction diathermy is associated with a number of difficulties, mainly associated with the use of the mirror. Transoral and transnasal 0 degree endoscopes have also been utilised but again have limitations. We describe a technique that overcomes the above problems. * A prospective case series of patients undergoing suction diathermy adenoidectomy under direct vision using a transoral 45 degree endoscope connected to a monitor was conducted, performed by surgical trainees and under direct supervision of the consultant trainer (J.R.-J.). * Intra-operatively, trainees had to demonstrate to the trainer the appropriate anatomy, completed adenoid ablation, and haemostasis. * Fifty-six cases have been performed. In every case, it was possible for the trainer to monitor the trainee's technique throughout the entire procedure. No complications have been reported. * We describe a modified technique which overcomes the disadvantages previously encountered by conventional suction diathermy adenoid ablation.

Day-case adenoidectomy: outcomes are improved using suction coagulation and prophylactic anti-emetic treatment

In 2004, the Department of Health published 10 High Impact Changes across the NHS. Of these, the first was treating day surgery as the norm for elective operations, releasing up to half a million in-patient beds each year. Adenoidectomy is an operation commonly performed in children for upper respiratory tract obstruction and as part of the surgical management of otitis media with effusion. Many surgeons consider the traditional curettage adenoidectomy as an unsatisfactory operation because it is performed blind, and is associated with varying reported levels of post-operative bleeding. Concern about the risk of bleeding and the frequent occurrence of post-operative nausea and vomiting have discouraged many surgeons from adopting adenoidectomy as a day-case procedure. We have audited the management and discharge of a cohort of 72 children undergoing traditional curettage adenoidectomy. Based on the results, we have completed the audit loop, by managing a second cohort of 77 children by suction coagulation adenoidectomy. An anaesthetic protocol has been designed to reduce post-operative nausea and vomiting, and facilitate same day discharge from hospital. The rate of post-operative nausea and vomiting fell from 21 to 1.3%, and the post-operative bleeding from 9.7% to nil. Discharge on the day of operation rose from 40.3 to 100%. Our audit confirms that these measures permit safe, day-case adenoidectomy.

Pathologic evaluation of routine tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy specimens in the pediatric population: is it really necessary?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the necessity of histopathologic examination for routine tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy in terms of unexpected malignancy by evaluating a large group of pediatric patients retrospectively with review of the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients under the age of 19 who underwent tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy between January 1990 and January 2005 was carried out. The records were analyzed concerning each patient's age, sex, indication for surgery, type of surgical procedure and the result of histopathologic examination of the specimen. The patients operated for chronic or recurrent infections and obstructive hypertrophy were included in the study. Moreover, the English literature was searched in Medline for articles published between 1949 and March 2005 and the studies dealing with pathologic analysis of tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy specimens were reviewed.

RESULTS

The total number of patients was 2826. After excluding 83 patients because of insufficient data, 2743 patients with an age distribution from 1 to 18 years (mean: 7.53) were reviewed. There were 1534 males (56%) and 1209 females (44%). Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy were performed together on 1930 patients (70%) while tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy alone were performed on 287 (10%) and 526 (20%) patients, respectively. Evaluation of the pathology reports revealed no malignancies. Review of the literature identified 14 articles and 5 of them included only pediatric patients. The rate of unexpected malignancies observed in these pediatric series varied between 0 and 0.18%.

CONCLUSION

After being evaluated by an experienced otolaryngologist, pathologic evaluation of all specimens may not be necessary if a child undergoing routine tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy is not found to have certain preoperative risk factors.