Treatment of ampicillin-resistant acute otitis media in the chinchilla

Studies in otitis media: Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh-University of Pittsburgh progress report--2004

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The present Progress Report has summarized the key otitis media clinical trials and laboratory studies conducted since 1969 by investigators at the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh-University of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, PA).

STUDY DESIGN

Review.

METHODS

Included in the discussion are the following: 1) studies of the epidemiology and risk factors; 2) anatomy and pathology of the eustachian tube-middle ear from human temporal bone histopathological specimens; 3) physiology and pathophysiology of the eustachian tube-middle ear in humans and animal models; 4) pathogenesis; 5) otitis media in special populations (e.g., patients with cleft palate, Native Americans, patients with Down syndrome); 6) microbiology; 7) diagnosis; 8) outcomes of randomized clinical trials that evaluated efficacy of nonsurgical and surgical methods of treatment and prevention; 9) studies of certain complications and sequelae (e.g., effect of middle-ear effusion on hearing, early child development, and the vestibular system; chronic suppurative otitis media). Also included are relevant summary tables and 256 references.

Efficacy of linezolid in experimental otitis media

Therapy for otitis media (OM) due to resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC of penicillin, >/=2.0 microgram/ml) is challenging. Linezolid, an oxazolidinone, represent a new class of antimicrobial agents with excellent in vitro activity against penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae; however, in vitro activity against nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHI) is limited. We evaluated its efficacy against experimental acute OM due to a multidrug-resistant S. pneumoniae isolate and two isolates of NTHI. The chinchilla model was utilized to evaluate the efficacy of linezolid against experimental infection due to S. pneumoniae or NTHI. Serum and middle ear antibiotic concentrations were determined, and sterilization of experimental OM was evaluated. Chinchillas were inoculated directly with S. pneumoniae into the superior bulla. Twenty-four hours after inoculation, all animals had positive middle ear and nasopharyngeal cultures. Animals were given linezolid at 25 mg/kg/dose twice a day (b.i.d.) by orogastric feeding tube or amoxicillin at 40 mg/kg/dose b.i.d. intramuscularly for 5 days. By day 5, all animals in the linezolid group had sterile middle ear cultures and eradication of S. pneumoniae from the nasopharynx. In the amoxicillin group, all nine animals remained middle ear and nasopharynx positive (P < 0.01). In animals inoculated with NTHI, 25 and 37.5 mg/kg b.i.d. failed to sterilize middle ear infection or eradicate colonization. Mean levels in middle ear fluid measured during experimental infection were 12.8 microgram/ml at 2 to 6 h and 4. 1 mirogram/ml at 16 to 17 h after orogastric dosing at 25 mg/kg. Linezolid achieved a high concentration in the middle ear during experimental OM. Linezolid eradicated multidrug-resistant S. pneumoniae from the middle ear and nasopharynx. Experimental infection and nasopharyngeal colonization due to NTHI persisted despite achievement of concentrations in the middle ear that were above the MIC (for NTHI).

Cefprozil treatment of persistent and recurrent acute otitis media

OBJECTIVE

We identified the pathogens causing persistent and recurrent acute otitis media (AOM) and the clinical efficacy of cefprozil as treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a noncomparative, open label multicenter trial. Children ages 6 months to 12 years with signs and symptoms of AOM and evidence of middle ear effusion, as confirmed by pneumatic otoscopy or tympanometry, underwent tympanocentesis and subsequent treatment with cefprozil (15 mg/kg given twice daily) for 10 days. Patients with recurrent otitis media or failure of previous antibiotic therapy or prophylaxis were particularly sought for the study.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-two (99%) of 265 enrolled children were considered evaluable. The median age of the study group was 1 year. Ninety-eight (37%) of the children had a history (within 30 days) of prior antibiotic use. Ninety-seven (37%) met our definition of recurrent AOM, 48 (18%) met our definition of persistent AOM and 132 (50%) children had 3 or more previous episodes of acute otitis media within 12 months before study. Eighty-two (31%) of the enrollment tympanocentesis had no growth, 150 (57%) had a single bacterial pathogen and 29 (11%) had multiple bacterial pathogens. Of the 93 Streptococcus pneumoniae pretreatment isolates, 50 (54%) were penicillin-susceptible, 12 (13%) were penicillin-intermediate resistant and 31 (33%) were penicillin-resistant. Of the 75 Haemophilus influenzae pretreatment isolates, 42 (56%) produced beta-lactamase as did 4 (27%) of the 15 Moraxella catarrhalis strains. A satisfactory clinical response by pathogen was found in 75% (70 of 93) with S. pneumoniae, 75% (56 of 75) with H. influenzae and 93% (13 of 14) with M. catarrhalis; the response with single pathogen infections was higher than those with multiple pathogens (118 of 150 (78%) and 17 of 29 (59%), respectively; P = 0.03). The response for patients with isolates of S. pneumoniae that were penicillin-susceptible, -intermediate or -resistant were 39 of 50 (78%), 11 of 12 (92%) and 21 of 31 (68%), respectively. Older children had a satisfactory clinical outcome more frequently than younger children (P < 0.001), and the response to therapy varied for persistent, recurrent and recently untreated AOM (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Persistent and recurrent AOM involves the same pathogens as recently untreated AOM but bacteria with reduced antibiotic susceptibility may be more frequently present. This noncomparative study suggests that cefprozil 30 mg/kg/day given in two divided doses for 10 days may be effective in the treatment of children with persistent and recurrent AOM.

Evaluation of mixtures of purified Haemophilus influenzae outer membrane proteins in protection against challenge with nontypeable H. influenzae in the chinchilla otitis media model

Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) is one of the leading causative agents of bacterial otitis media, and no vaccine has been shown to be effective against it. Three outer membrane lipoproteins of NTHi have been investigated extensively and are leading candidates for inclusion in a vaccine against this organism. Hi-PAL (P6), recombinant PCP (rPCP), and e (P4) proteins are antigenically conserved among NTHi strains and elicit bactericidal and protective antibodies. A genetic fusion of the rPCP and Hi-PAL proteins has also been reported. Mixtures of these proteins were used for active immunization experiments in the chinchilla model of otitis media. Chinchillas were immunized either with a mixture of all three lipoproteins or with the mixture of rPCP-PAL hybrid plus e protein. When these animals were challenged with a NTHi strain injected directly into the middle ears, no protection from infection or disease, as measured by otoscopy, was observed in either group. However, effusion and inflammation measured by tympanometry were significantly reduced in animals immunized with the three lipoproteins. Animals that had been immunized with either whole NTHi cells or total outer membranes and then challenged with the homologous strain were significantly protected from both infection and disease, as determined by tympanometry and otoscopy. Unlike other animals antisera, chinchilla antisera against the purified proteins had no bactericidal activity against NTHi but did fix complement on the cell surface. Thus, the chinchilla immune responses to mixtures of these lipoproteins differ from the immune responses observed in other animal species. Further evaluation of these proteins for their vaccine potential remains to be done.

Sulbactam/ampicillin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use

Sulbactam is a semisynthetic beta-lactamase inhibitor which when combined with certain beta-lactam antibacterials extends their activity against bacteria that are normally resistant to the antibiotic due to production of beta-lactamases. In combination with ampicillin it extends the antibacterial activity of ampicillin to include beta-lactamase-producing strains which are otherwise resistant, including Bacteroides fragilis, and increases the susceptibility of many sensitive strains. Sulbactam is poorly absorbed after oral administration and sulbactam/ampicillin is therefore administered parenterally, although another linked sulbactam-ampicillin compound, sultamicillin, has been developed which is well absorbed after oral administration. The basic pharmacokinetic characteristics of sulbactam after parenteral administration are similar to those of ampicillin. Multiple-dose therapy with sulbactam/ampicillin is clinically and bacteriologically effective in infections of the urinary tract, skin and soft tissue, bones and joints, respiratory tract, ears, nose and throat, as well as intra-abdominal and obstetric and gynaecological infections and septicaemia. In addition, single intramuscular doses of sulbactam/ampicillin administered with oral probenecid are therapeutically effective in gonorrhoea, including infections due to penicillinase-producing and/or ampicillin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. In the prophylaxis of infectious complications of surgery sulbactam/ampicillin is superior to placebo and appears to be similar in efficacy to several alternative antibacterial regimens. Further studies involving larger numbers of patients are needed to clarify the comparative therapeutic and prophylactic efficacy of sulbactam/ampicillin and alternative antibacterial drugs. Nonetheless, sulbactam/ampicillin improves the therapeutic and prophylactic efficacy of an antibacterial of familiar safety, and must be seen as a worthwhile advance.