Morphologic changes and outcome following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair as a function of aneurysm size

Effect of vertebral compression fractures on aortic neck angulation after endovascular aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

Aortic neck angulation (ANA) prior to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and its changes after EVAR are considered important predictors of postoperative complications. We sought to assess the effects of vertebral body height loss on ANA in patients post-EVAR.

METHODS

All patients who had undergone EVAR for infrarenal aortic aneurysms in our institution between August 2010 and December 2018 were assessed. Anterior and posterior vertebral body heights were measured in all patients on preoperative, early postoperative, and follow-up computed tomography scans (T12-L5 vertebral bodies). Patients who had significant height loss in their follow-up period were designated as the Study group. These were matched to a Control group of the same size using propensity-score matching based on age, gender, and duration between follow-up scans. Aortic neck morphology indices including ANA and its changes were measured, and information related to postoperative endoleaks and aneurysm sac size were extracted in the Study and Control groups.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, 10 of 185 patients had a radiologically significant vertebral body compression fracture. There was no significant difference between the Study (n = 10) and Control groups in age (77.6 ± 6.9 vs 77.2 ± 7.5 years; P = .64), gender (seven males and three females in each group; P = 1.0), duration between postoperative scans (1830 ± 665 vs 1800 ± 670 days; P = .25), preoperative ANA (36.0° ± 15.6° vs 42.4° ± 18.6°; P = .41), and early postoperative ANA (21.9° ± 11.7° vs 20.9° ± 16.3°; P = .72). Changes in ANA in the postoperative period (7.2° ± 11.1° vs -4.7° ± 6.7°; P = .009; power = .838) were significantly higher in the Study group.

CONCLUSION

Post-EVAR vertebral body compression fractures exacerbate ANA. Awareness of this can guide both preoperative assessment and postoperative management and follow-up.

Proximal Aortic Neck Progression: Before and After Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treatment

Several risk factors including short or highly angulated proximal aortic neck have been associated with long-term outcomes after endovascular or open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. However, research data have emerged recently concerning the behavior of proximal aortic neck, and several authors have tried to evaluate this behavior after endovascular or open repair. Additionally, computed tomography angiography (CTA) remains the golden standard for detecting and observing the morphology of an AAA, both before and after treatment. Moreover, the question of whether the proximal neck’s progression independently affects postoperative morbidity and reintervention risks still remains. Therefore, this focused review aims to present all relevant data on the behavior of an AAAs neck, based on CTA imaging before and after repair, in order to produce useful conclusions for future clinical practice.

Endovascular Repair of Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Paradigm Shift?

Recent reports have documented poor long-term results following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of large abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). EVAR of small AAAs may result in improved long-term results compared to large AAAs. It is not known whether the frequency of anatomic suitability for EVAR is increased for small compared to large AAAs. This study compared the anatomic suitability of large and small AAAs for EVAR in an unselected patient population. Radiology reports for all computed tomography (CT) scans in a single hospital over a recent 3-year period were reviewed. AAAs diagnosed by contrasted CT scans with cuts >7 mm were excluded. Suitability for EVAR was determined by neck diameter, length, and angulation. In addition, iliac diameters and common iliac distal landing zone lengths were determined. Computerized 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction was used to measure neck angulation and total aortic tortuosity. One hundred ninety-one patients were found to have AAAs with adequate CT scans for evaluation. Suitability for EVAR was highest in patients with AAA diameters of 3–4 cm and declined with increasing size of the AAA. Dividing AAAs into sizes greater than or less than 5.5 cm revealed that small AAAs had significantly longer necks, less neck angulation, longer common iliac landing zones, and less total aortic tortuosity. Multivariable analysis revealed that maximal aortic diameter was the only independent predictor of suitability for EVAR (p = 0.005, odds ratio 1.67, CI 95% = 1.17 to 2.38). The odds ratio predicts that with each 1 cm increase in size, the likelihood of suitability decreased by 5.3-fold. Small AAAs have less complex anatomy with longer aortic necks, less neck angulation, and less tortuosity. The poor outcomes following the treatment of large AAAs is thought to be due to complex anatomy. EVAR of less anatomically challenging small AAAs may improve longterm outcomes.

Management of small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms - a review

The approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) larger than 55 mm is well defined due to the risk of rupture being higher than 10% per year, and a 30-day perioperative mortality rate between 2.5% and 5%. However, the approach for small asymptomatic AAAs is less well defined.There are different definitions given to describe a small AAA. The one the authors accepted and applied is "a localized, permanent and irreversible dilation of the aorta of at least 50% in relation to the normal adjacent infrarenal or suprarenal aorta, with a maximum diameter between 30-55 mm".The investigators of the largest study on small AAAs (United Kingdom Small Aneurysm Trial [UK-SAT]) concluded, in brief, that ultrasound monitoring is the most appropriate solution because the results do not support a policy of surgical restoration for AAAs with a diameter of between 40 mm and 55 mm.The aim of the present review article is to highlight several challenges that could change the limits or create a more flexible deciding factor in the management of AAAs. There are multiple factors that influence surgical decision-making, and the limit on aneurysm diameter that indicates surgery should depend on the patient's age, life expectancy, general status, associated diseases, diameter in relation to body mass, risk factors, sex, anxiety and compliance during the follow-up period. Monitoring is an acceptable alternative for AAAs between 40 mm and 55 mm, and is probably the best solution for high-risk patients. Surgery is the most reasonable solution for patients who are at moderate risk, have a significant life expectancy, are less than 70 to 75 years of age, and/or have aortic aneurysms larger than 50 mm.

Aortic length changes during abdominal aortic aneurysm formation, expansion and stabilisation in a rat model

BACKGROUND

Determinants of extracellular matrix (ECM) destruction/reconstruction balance influencing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter may impact length.

OBJECTIVE

Document aortic lengthening, its correlation to diameter, and determine how treatments that impact diameter also affect length.

METHODS

Three hundred and fifty-five diameter and length measurements were performed in 308 rats during AAA formation, expansion and stabilisation in guinea pig aortas xenografted in rats. Impact of modulation of ECM destructive/reconstructive balance by endovascular Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell (VSMCs) seeding, TIMP-1, PAI-1 and TGF-beta1 overexpression on length has been assessed.

RESULTS

Length increased in correlation with diameter during formation (correlation coefficient (cc): 0.584, P<0.0001) and expansion (cc: 0.352, P=0.0055) of AAAs. Overexpression of TIMP-1 and PAI-1 decreased lengthening (P=0.02 and 0.014, respectively) demonstrating that elongation is driven by matrix metalloproteinases and their activation by the plasmin pathway. Overexpression of TGF-beta1 controlled length in formed AAAs (17.3 ± 9.6 vs. 5.9 ± 7.4mm, P=0.022), but not VSMC seeding, although both therapies efficiently prevented further diameter increase. Length and diameter correlation was lost after biotherapies.

CONCLUSION

Length increases in correlation with diameter during AAA formation and expansion, as a consequence of ECM injury driven by MMPs activated by the plasmin pathway. Correlation between length and diameter increases is not universally preserved.

Outcome after endografting in small and large abdominal aortic aneurysms: a metanalysis

AIM

To compare the results of endovascular repair (EVAR) in large and small (diameter < 5.5cm) abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify studies comparing the outcomes after EVAR of large and small aneurysms. Outcomes considered were: risk of death (perioperative, all cause, aneurysm-related), ruptures, and complications (conversion, reintervention). Weighted pooled estimates of outcomes in patients with small versus large aneurysms were calculated. The inverse variance method was used (random-effect model). Subgroup analyses by a follow-up longer or shorter than 24 months were performed.

RESULTS

Five studies, with published and unpublished data, totallying 7,735 patients, were included. Overall, the weighted pooled estimates were: OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.51-0.90 for operative mortality, OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.86 for all cause mortality, OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.87 for aneurysm-related mortality and OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.79 for rupture in favour of small AAA group. Pooled estimates were not influenced by follow-up length. Conversion and reintervention rates were not significantly lower for small AAA.

CONCLUSIONS

EVAR in small versus large AAA might be associated with lower operative mortality, aneurysm-related mortality and aneurysm rupture. Better evidence is needed to support these suggestions.

Surveillance of small aortic aneurysms does not alter anatomic suitability for endovascular repair

OBJECTIVE

Small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs; 4-5.4 cm) are more likely to be suitable for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) than large aortic aneurysms (>5.5 cm). The purpose of this study was to determine whether small AAA growth is associated with the development of morphologic characteristics that decrease eligibility for EVAR.

METHODS

We studied 54 patients who underwent 2 or more computed tomography scans with 3-dimensional reconstruction during surveillance of small AAAs. Morphologic aortic aneurysm features and changes were measured according to Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards. Suitability for EVAR was determined by neck anatomy (diameter, length, and angulations), iliac artery morphology, and total aortic aneurysm angulation and tortuosity.

RESULTS

The median age of the study cohort was 73 years (interquartile range [IQR], 65-77 years). The median follow-up period was 24 months (IQR, 15-36 months). The median small AAA diameter increased from 44.5 mm (IQR, 41-48 mm) to 48.9 mm (IQR, 45.7-52.0 mm). The median aortic neck diameter increased from 23.0 to 24.0 mm (P = .002), whereas median neck length decreased from 26.5 to 20.0 mm (P = .001). Aortic aneurysm median tortuosity index increased from 1.09 to 1.11 (P = .05). No significant changes in iliac artery morphology occurred. Overall, the anatomic suitability for endovascular repair did not significantly change during the study period (74% vs 69%; McNemar test; P = .25).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in aortic morphology are frequently associated with small AAA growth at mid-term follow-up, but such changes are minor and do not affect overall anatomic suitability for EVAR. These data reveal that continued surveillance of small AAAs does not threaten the window of opportunity for EVAR.

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Alters Renal Artery Movement: A Preliminary Evaluation Using Dynamic CTA

PURPOSE

To observe the natural renal artery motion during cardiac cycles in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and how the implantation of stent-grafts may distort this movement.

METHODS

Data on 29 renal arteries from 15 male patients (mean age 72.6 years, range 66-83) treated with Talent or Excluder stent-grafts were acquired using an electrocardiographically (ECG)-gated dynamic 64-slice CT scanner. ECG-triggered retrospective reconstructions were made at 8 equidistant time points over the R-R cardiac cycle. The gated datasets were reconstructed perpendicular to the center flow lumen of each renal artery at 1.2 and 2.4 cm from the renal ostium. Center of mass displacement was determined per cardiac cycle for pre- and post-EVAR renal arteries and compared.

RESULTS

Normal renal artery motion in AAA patients was impressive, with up to 3-mm movement both near and distant from the aorta (mean 2.0+/-0.6 mm, range 1.1-3.0). EVAR inhibited proximal renal motion, resulting in a 31% decrease in maximal movement (mean 1.4+/-0.7 mm, range 0.7-2.0; p < or = 0.05). Distal renal artery motion was unaffected by EVAR, with motion similar to the pre-EVAR state.

CONCLUSION

ECG-gated dynamic CTA is feasible on a 64-slice scanner with a standard radiation dose and can detect potentially serious consequences of EVAR. EVAR alters renal artery motion by limiting proximal motion while leaving distal motion unaffected.

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair versus Open Aneurysm Repair: Comparison of Treatment Outcome and Procedure-Related Reintervention Rate

We conducted a retrospective study to compare treatment outcome and procedure-related reintervention rates of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with those of open repair. Clinical and radiological data of patients treated at the Rijnstate Hospital (Arnhem, The Netherlands) for nonsymptomatic aortic abdominal aneurysm during October 1998-January 2004 were reviewed and analyzed for demographic data, aneurysm specifics, comorbid condition status, and perioperative outcome. There were 99 patients treated with EVAR and 116 patients treated with open repair. Significant differences in age were seen between treatment groups, patients under the age of 80 being more likely to have open repair (p < 0.004). The EVAR group consisted of significantly fewer women (p < 0.029). Of seven comorbid conditions, four reached significant differences between treatment groups; patients with ischemic heart disease (p < 0.044), heart failure (p < 0.006), renal failure (p < 0.033), or peripheral arterial disease (p < 0.006) were more likely to have EVAR. Comparison of aneurysm anatomy showed no difference in size between EVAR (mean 57.7 mm, 95% CI 55.9-59.5 mm) and open repair (mean 60.1 mm, 95% CI 57.9-62.3 mm). Significant differences were seen in aneurysm neck length and diameter. Operative outcome showed differences in length of hospital stay (median, EVAR 7 vs. open repair 11 days), 30-day mortality (p < 0.048), postoperative hematoma (p < 0.001), and postoperative pulmonary infections (p < 0.001), all in favor of EVAR. Follow-up of the EVAR group showed a decrease (mean 10 mm, 95% CI 7-14 mm) of aneurysm diameter in 15% of cases during follow-up (mean 18 months, range 1-66). Despite higher age and more comorbidity of patients undergoing EVAR, 30-day mortality, postoperative pulmonary infection rate, and length of hospital stay were lower than for those undergoing open repair. Both EVAR and open repair can be performed on a subset of patients with low mortality, complication, and reintervention rates.

Systematic review of recent evidence for the safety and efficacy of elective endovascular repair in the management of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm

Background

Conventional management of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is by open repair and is associated with a mortality rate of 2–6 per cent. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an alternative technique first introduced in 1991. A systematic review was undertaken of the evidence for the safety and efficacy of elective EVAR in the management of asymptomatic infrarenal AAA.

Methods

Thirteen electronic bibliographical databases were searched, covering biomedical, health-related, science and social science literature. Outcomes were assessed with respect to efficacy (successful deployment, technical success, conversion rates and secondary intervention rates) and safety (30-day mortality rate, procedure morbidity rates and technical issues—endoleaks, graft thrombosis, stenosis and migration).

Results

Of 606 reports identified, 61 met the inclusion criteria (three randomized and 15 non-randomized controlled trials, and 43 uncontrolled studies). There were 29 059 participants in total; 19 804 underwent EVAR. Deployment was successful in 97·6 per cent of cases. Technical success (complete aneurysm exclusion) was 81·9 per cent at discharge and 88·8 per cent at 30 days. Secondary intervention to treat endoleak or maintain graft patency was required in 16·2 per cent of patients. Mean stay in the intensive care unit and mean hospital stay were significantly shorter following EVAR. The 30-day mortality rate for EVAR was 1·6 per cent (randomized controlled trials) and 2·0 per cent in nonrandomized trials and case series. Technical complications comprised stent migration (4·0 per cent), graft limb thrombosis (3·9 per cent), endoleak (type I, 6·8 per cent; type II, 10·3 per cent; type III, 4·2 per cent) and access artery injury (4·8 per cent).

Discussion

EVAR is technically effective and safe, with lower short-term morbidity and mortality rates than open surgery. However, there is a need for extended follow-up as the long-term success of EVAR in preventing aneurysm-related deaths is not yet known.

What is the significance of endoleaks and endotension

Endovascular repair has been used over a decade as a treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm, and has become a widely accepted treatment method with a low rate of perioperative complications. Endoleak, perigraft blood flow outside endograft but within aneurysmsac, has been intensively studied during the last 10 years of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVR). The natural history of aneurysms with endoleak and the true clinical significance of various types of endoleaks remains unclear. Type I/III endoleak has been found to be associated with aneurysm rupture, while the risk of rupture of aneurysms with type II endoleak and endotension appears very small. In endotension, the aneurysm sac remains pressurized, even if there is no evidence of an endoleak. Currently,it is accepted that type I/III endoleaks should be corrected, preferably by endovascular means, due to the risk of rupture. If endovascular repair is not possible, then open conversion should be considered. The risk of conversion should be weighed against the risk of aneurysm rupture. Treatment of type II endoleaks and endotension is more controversial. In those with aneurysm enlargement,secondary interventions are often performed.

Change in Aneurysm Diameter After Stent-Graft Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

PURPOSE

To compare the changes in aneurysm size following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for ruptured versus elective abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

METHODS

Aneurysm sac diameter was measured from computed tomographic (CT) scans in 14 hemodynamically stable patients (14 men; mean age 74+/-7 years, range 60 to 83) prior to emergent stent-graft repair for ruptured AAA. The aneurysm diameter change was followed postprocedurally with serial CT and the outcomes compared to 74 AAA patients (58 men; mean age 74+/-7 years, range 56 to 87) having elective EVAR in the same time period. The mean rate of sac decrease (mm/month) was calculated for each group.

RESULTS

There were 3 postoperative deaths in the ruptured AAA cohort, leaving 11 patients available for follow-up analysis (mean 16 months, range 2-49). Eight (73%) patients with ruptured AAA demonstrated significantly decreased (>5 mm) aneurysm diameters compared with 32 (43%) elective cases (p=0.07) followed a mean 20 months (range 3-51). The mean rate of sac diameter decrease was 1.50+/-1.03 mm/month in the rupture group versus 0.73+/-0.86 mm/month in the elective group (p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that ruptured AAAs treated with stent-graft experience sac regression at a higher rate compared with electively treated AAA. The reasons for these findings remain unclear.

Perirenal Fixation as an Independent Factor in Aortic Remodeling after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the influence of perirenal fixation of endovascular aortic grafts on the rate of endoleak and aortic sac remodeling. Retrospective analysis of all patients (pts.) after undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) at our institution was performed. Pre- and postoperative aortic dimensions were obtained from CT scans and angiograms. Intraoperative angiograms were reviewed and patients grouped by the proximity of the graft to the lowest renal arteries: group I: flush with the lowest renal artery; group II: < or = 5 mm distal to lowest renal artery; and group III: >5 mm distal to lowest renal artery. Of the 96 grafts placed between 2000 and 2002, 44 were AneuRx (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) and 52 were Ancure (Guidant, Menlo Park, CA) devices. There were 39 pts. in group I, 42 in group II, and 11 in group III (data on 5 pts. were not obtained). At 6 months, the mean decrease in sac diameter for all groups was 0.42 +/- 0.08 cm (1: 0.56 +/- 0.11 cm; 11: 0.38 +/- 0.11 cm; III: 0.6 +/- 0.15 cm). There was no significant difference between each group. When perirenal fixation (group I) was compared with nonperirenal fixation (groups II and III), there was a significant difference in sac shrinkage at 6 months (p < 0.05, ANOVA). Group I had shorter necks and smaller aneurysms (2.2 +/- 0.1 cm and 5.3 +/- 0.1 cm) than those of groups II and III (2.7 +/- 0.1 cm and 5.7 +/- 0.1 cm, p < 0.05, ANOVA). There was no difference in aortic neck diameter or in aortic neck diameter to graft ratio. When controlled for the variables studied (AAA diameter, length of neck, diameter of neck, diameter of neck to graft ratio, and any endoleak by 6 months), logistic regression analysis identified perirenal fixation as the only significant factor in aortic sac shrinkage of >0.4 cm by 6 months (odds ratio = 16, p < 0.01). With the same variables, a linear regression model also identified perirenal fixation as the only predictive factor in aortic shrinkage (regression coefficient = 0.46, p < 0.05). The endoleak-free survival rate with perirenal fixation was 96 +/- 5% and without it was 80 +/- 7% (Kaplan Meier, p = 0.09, log rank). Perirenal placement of endovascular grafts is associated with a trend toward fewer endoleaks, and improved aortic sac shrinkage independent of aortic neck length, AAA diameter, diameter of neck, and endoleak. Failure to achieve perirenal placement of EVAG increased the likelihood of reduced or failed aortic sac shrinkage in this series.