Glycolide copolymer staple-line reinforcement reduces staple site bleeding during laparoscopic gastric bypass: a prospective randomized trial

A Single-Institution 5-Year Retrospective Analysis of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Staple-Line Reinforcement: Bioabsorbable Mesh Versus Oversewing

Background: Staple-line reinforcement has been used to decrease complications such as staple-line bleeding (SLB) and staple-line leaks (SLLs) in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG). There is little data comparing bioabsorbable mesh reinforcement (BMR) with oversewing the staple line (OSL). The aim of our study was to compare BMR with OSL in SG. Materials and Methods: This is a single-institution retrospective analysis comparing risks and benefits of BMR (group a) with those of OSL (group b) for SG staple-line reinforcement between 2015 and 2020. Results: In total, 857 patients were identified. There were 452 (52.74%) in group a and 405 (47.26%) in group b. SLB requiring transfusion occurred in 6 (1.32%) patients in group a and 6 (1.48%) patients in group b, NS (P = .848). Zero SLL was identified in either group. One-year mean direct cost of SG in group a was $7881 compared with $6677 in group b. Conclusion: This retrospective study showed that there was low risk of bleeding or leak with either technique of staple-line reinforcement and there was no significant difference in SLB or leak rate with bioabsorbable mesh versus oversewing. The use of bioabsorbable mesh was more expensive than oversewing.

The clinical effectiveness of staple line reinforcement with different matrix used in surgery

Staplers are widely used in clinics; however, complications such as bleeding and leakage remain a challenge for surgeons. To tackle this issue, buttress materials are recommended to reinforce the staple line. This Review provides a systematic summary of the characteristics and applications of the buttress materials. First, the physical and chemical properties of synthetic polymer materials and extracellular matrix used for the buttress materials are introduced, as well as their pros and cons in clinical applications. Second, we review the clinical effects of reinforcement mesh in pneumonectomy, sleeve gastrectomy, pancreatectomy, and colorectal resection. Based on the analysis of numerous research data, we believe that buttress materials play a crucial role in increasing staple line strength and reducing the probability of complications, such as bleeding and leakage. However, considering the requirements of bioactivity, degradability, and biosafety, non-crosslinked small intestinal submucosa (SIS) matrix material is the preferred candidate. It has high research and application value, but further studies are required to confirm this. The aim of this Review is to provide comprehensive guidance on the selection of materials for staple line reinforcement.

Biosynthetic Mesh Reconstruction after Abdominoperineal Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Cross Relation of Surgical Healing and Oncological Outcomes: A Multicentric Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Local wound complications are among the most relevant sequelae after an abdominoperineal resection (APR) for low rectal cancer. One of the proposed techniques to improve the postoperative recovery and to accelerate the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy is the mesh reinforcement of the perineal wound. The aim of the current study is to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes after APR performed with a biosynthetic mesh reconstruction versus the conventional procedure.

METHODS

From 2015 to 2020, in two tertiary centres, the surgical outcomes, the wound events (i.e., surgical site infections, wound dehiscence and the complete healing time) and the oncological outcomes (i.e., time length to start adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, an over 8-week delay in chemotherapy and the recurrence rate) were retrospectively analysed in patients undergoing APR reinforced with biosynthetic mesh (Group A) and conventional APR (Group B). Results Sixty-one patients were treated with APR (25 in Group A and 36 in Group B). Patients in Group A presented lower time for: healing (16 versus 24 days, p = 0.015), inferior perineal wound dehiscence rates (one versus nine cases, p = 0.033), an earlier adjuvant therapy start (26 versus 70 days, p = 0.003) and a lower recurrence rate (16.6% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.152).

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, the use of a biosynthetic mesh for the neo-perineum reconstruction after a Miles' procedure has resulted in safe, reproducible results affected by limited complications, guarantying a rapid start of the adjuvant therapy with clear benefits in oncological outcomes. Further randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-up are needed to validate these results.

Is staple line reinforcement still needed on contemporary staplers? A benchtop analysis

BACKGROUND

Staple line reinforcement (SLR) is commonly used in bariatric surgeries to reduce leaks and bleeds. With the evolution of staplers, the need for buttressing with the latest surgical stapling technology is in question. The efficacy of GORE® SEAMGUARD® (G-SLR) to improve staple line strength based on an established measure of burst pressure was evaluated. A benchtop test on synthetic tissue evaluated the pressure required for staple line leak across surgical staplers with and without G-SLR.

METHODS

Staple lines on a consistent thickness synthetic bowel were pressurized to the point of failure (burst pressure) among Ethicon®, Intuitive®, and Medtronic® surgical staplers with and without G-SLR. Burst pressure and leak location (through the staple line [TTSL] or through the staple [TTS], on the anvil or cartridge side) were recorded. Visual confirmation of a leak concluded each test.

RESULTS

The pooled mean burst pressure for G-SLR was greater (p < 0.05) by 0.494 pounds/square inch compared with no reinforcement with no meaningful differences among staplers. Leak failures were primarily TTS (91.7%) and equally distributed between reinforcement groups with more leak failures on the cartridge side with G-SLR and on the anvil side for non-SLR group. Leaks occurred across the length of staple lines with no discernable pattern.

CONCLUSION

Employing a buttressing material strengthens the staple line, as measured by burst pressure, and may reduce the risk for staple line failure. This benchtop study of G-SLR with three commonly used surgical staplers demonstrated a significant increase in burst pressures among the studied stapling devices.

Tranexamic acid effects in postoperative bleeding outcomes in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a controlled study

PURPOSE

To demonstrate through a controlled study whether the use of tranexamic acid in bariatric surgeries is effective for bleeding control.

METHODS

Prospective, comparative, and double-blind study performed with patients from 18 to 65 years old submitted to bariatric surgery. The selected patients received venous tranexamic acid (TXA) during the induction of anesthesia or not (CG). The anesthesia and thromboprophylaxis protocols were similar among the groups. For statistical analysis, the χ2 and analysis of variance tests were performed at a significance level of p < 0.05, using the statistical program SPSS 21.0®.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were included in the study, 31 in the control group and 30 in the TXA group (GTXA). In the intraoperative period, the bleeding volume was greater in the CG than in the GTXA. In the postoperative period, the tranexamic acid group had a higher value hematocrit, absence of surgical reoperations due to bleeding complications, and shorter hospitalization time than the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of tranexamic acid was effective in reducing bleeding rates and of hospital stay length, in addition to demonstrating the clinical safety of its use, for not having been associated with any thromboembolic events.

Early Bleeding After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management - a 21-Year Experience

Purpose

Morbidity and mortality associated with bariatric surgery are considered low. The aim of this study is to assess the incidence, clinical presentation, risk factors, and management of early postoperative bleeding (POB) after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric by-pass (RYGB).

Materials and Methods

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients who underwent RYGB in 2 expert bariatric centers between January 1999 and April 2020, with a common bariatric surgeon.

Results

A total of 2639 patients underwent RYGB and were included in the study. POB occurred in 72 patients (2.7%). Intraluminal bleeding (ILB) was present in 52 (72%) patients and extra-luminal bleeding (ELB) in 20 (28%) patients. POB took place within the first 3 postoperative days in 79% of patients. The most frequent symptom was tachycardia (63%). Abdominal pain was more regularly seen with ILB, compared to ELB (50% vs. 20%, respectively, p = 0.02). Male sex was an independent risk factor of POB on multivariate analysis (p < 0.01). LOS was significantly longer in patients who developed POB (8.3 vs. 3.8 days, p < 0.01). Management was conservative for most cases (68%). Eighteen patients with ILB (35%) and 5 patients with ELB (25%) required reoperation. One patient died from multiorgan failure after staple-line dehiscence of the excluded stomach (mortality 0.04%).

Conclusion

The incidence of POB is low, yet it is the most frequent postoperative complication after RYGB. Most POB can be managed conservatively while surgical treatment is required for patients with hemodynamic instability or signs of intestinal obstruction due to an intraluminal clot.

Graphical abstract

Early Postoperative Bleeding After Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass: a Single Center Analysis

PURPOSE

Early postoperative bleeding is a common complication after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and is associated with significant morbidity. We aimed to identify predictors of early postoperative bleeding after LRYGB and characterize hemorrhagic events and 30-day postoperative outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study regarding all patients submitted to LRYGB in 2019 at a high-volume obesity center. Early postoperative bleeding was defined as any clinically significant evidence of hemorrhage in the early postoperative period. Demographic, preoperative, and intraoperative factors were evaluated for associations with postoperative bleeding. Postoperative outcomes were compared between patients with and without hemorrhage.

RESULTS

Of 340 patients submitted to LRYGB, 14 (4.1%) had early postoperative bleeding. Patients with bleeding had an increased preoperative left hepatic lobe diameter (8.4 vs. 7.3 cm, p = 0.048). Prior cholecystectomy (28.6 vs. 14.5%) and previous bariatric surgery (35.7 vs. 23.9%) tended to be more prevalent among these patients. Bleeding occurred at a median time of 31.2 [IQR 19.7-38.5] h. Thirteen patients presented with intraluminal bleeding and one with extraluminal bleeding. Melena was the most common symptom. All hemorrhages were clinically diagnosed, and 92.9% were managed conservatively. Postoperative bleeding was associated with longer hospital stay (3.5 vs. 2.0 days), higher reintervention (7.1 vs. 0%), and readmission (14.3 vs. 0%), all p < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Bleeding was the most frequent early complication after LRYGB. Patients with hepatomegaly and prior surgeries may have technically challenging LRYGB and should be carefully assessed. Perioperative strategies should be encouraged in high-risk patients to prevent bleeding.

Sleeve Gastrectomy Performed with Single Staple Height and Bioabsorbable Reinforcement in a Single Surgeon > 2500 Consecutive Case Series: Is Smart Technology Necessary?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is shown to have durable and sustained weight reduction outcomes and improvement in comorbid conditions in patients with severe clinical obesity. Discussions regarding "proper" staple height for various gastric locations continue. We propose a standard approach of consistent use of single staple load height and bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement during the LSG to reduce variability.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 2556 consecutive cases of adult patients who underwent LSG evaluated perioperative complications, postoperative leaks or bleeding, and average weight and body mass index (BMI) change and excess weight loss (EWL) at 6, 12, and 24 months. The same green staple load (2.0 mm) and staple line reinforcement were used in all cases for all staple firings, regardless of patient size or gastric location.

RESULTS

Patients were a mean age of 42 years, 87.3% were female, and the mean preoperative weight was 134.2 kg and BMI was 48.2 kg/m². No staple line leak was detected. Three bleeding events occurred but did not require readmission or rehospitalization. Mean EWL and BMI, respectively, were 49.0% and 35.5 kg/m² at 6 months, 69.8% and 29.6 kg/m² at 12 months, and 70.0% and 29.5 kg/m² at 24 months.

CONCLUSION

In this case series of 2556 consecutive LSG performed by a single surgeon, clinically meaningful EWL and decreased BMI were achieved. Streamlining the LSG procedure by utilizing the same staple height and a bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement proved safe with minimal complications.

A Novel, Easy-to-Use Staple Line Reinforcement for Surgical Staplers

Background

Staple line reinforcement (SLR) is a popular tool used by surgeons to increase staple line strength and improve peri-operative hemostasis. However, currently marketed buttress materials require special attention in attachment to the staple anvil and cartridge and may come loose during typical maneuvering of stapling procedures. We have evaluated a new SLR that has an attachment material that affixes buttress across the entire anvil and cartridge face to prevent slipping, twisting, sliding and/or bunching.

Methods

In benchtop and preclinical testing, the new buttress material (ECHELON ENDOPATH™ Staple Line Reinforcement) was compared to a commercially available SLR for physical characteristics, including strength, absorption, security on the anvil and cartridge during stapler manipulation, impact on the tissue healing response and tissue abrasion. The two SLR’s were also compared to a staple line without buttress for hemostasis.

Results

The new SLR was 180% stronger initially and maintained a greater strength for up to 14 days of exposure to an in vitro solution (p≤0.001), even though it was lighter and exhibited a faster rate of degradation. The new buttress material maintained complete adherence to the anvil and cartridge throughout tissue manipulation, whereas the commercial product lost substantial coverage in 72% of samples. Both SLR’s provided superior hemostasis to the non-buttress control, with minimal impact on tissue healing or abrasion.

Conclusion

Because the new buttress material comes with attachment material affixed across the entire anvil and cartridge face of the stapler and maintains coverage during manipulations, it should be much easier to use. The physical characteristics of the new SLR were as good as or better than current product that requires the buttress to be applied to the cartridge and anvil. In addition, the new SLR is similar in hemostasis to standard products and superior to stapling without the use of buttress. Further research is needed to determine whether these preclinical benefits carry over into a clinical setting.

Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review

Background

Staple-line leaks following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) remain a concerning complication. Staple-line buttressing is largely adopted as an acceptable reinforcement but data regarding leaks have been equivocal. This study compared staple-line leaks in five reinforcement options during LSG: no reinforcement (NO-SLR), oversewing (suture), nonabsorbable bovine pericardial strips (BPS), tissue sealant or fibrin glue (Seal), or absorbable polymer membrane (APM).

Methods

This systematic review study of articles published between 2012 and 2016 regarding LSG leak rates aligned with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Variables of interest included leak rates, bleeding, and complications in addition to surgical and population parameters. An independent Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the number of patients with and without leaks for the different reinforcement options.

Results

Of the 1633 articles identified, 148 met inclusion criteria and represented 40,653 patients. Differences in age (older in APM; p = 0.001), starting body mass index (lower in Suture; p = 0.008), and distance from pylorus (closer in BPS; p = 0.04) were observed between groups, but mean bougie size was equivalent. The overall leak rate of 1.5% (607 leaks) ranged from 0.7% for APM (significantly lower than all groups; p ≤ 0.007 for next lowest leak rate) to 2.7% (BPS).

Conclusions

This systematic review of staple-line leaks following LSG demonstrated a significantly lower rate using APM staple-line reinforcement as compared to oversewing, use of sealants, BPS reinforcement, or no reinforcement. Variation in surgical technique may also contribute to leak rates.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-019-06782-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Postoperative bleeding after laparoscopic Roux en Y gastric bypass: predictors and consequences

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a common, safe and effective bariatric procedure. Bleeding is a significant source of postoperative morbidity. We aimed to determine the incidence, outcomes, and predictors of postoperative bleeding after LRYGB.

METHODS

LRYGB patients included in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) 2015 dataset were identified. Preoperative and intraoperative factors were tested for associations with bleeding using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Outcomes of length of stay, in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, discharge disposition, and 30-day complications among patients with and without clinically significant postoperative bleeding were compared using multivariable regression.

RESULTS

In the 43,280 LRYGB patients included in this analysis, postoperative bleeding occurred in 652 (1.51%) patients. Of these, 165 (25.3%) underwent a re-operation and 97 (14.9%) underwent an unplanned endoscopy for 'bleeding'. Postoperative bleeding was associated with a longer median postoperative length of stay (4 vs. 2 days), higher in-hospital mortality (1.23 vs. 0.04%), higher 30-day mortality (1.38 vs. 0.15%), discharge to an extended-care facility (3.88 vs. 0.6%), and higher rates of major complications (all P < 0.05). Independent predictors of postoperative bleeding included; a history of renal insufficiency (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.43-4.52), preoperative therapeutic anticoagulation (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.69-3.53), and revisional surgery (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.06-1.97). Intraoperative associated factors included conversions (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.42-7.97), and drain placement (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.18-1.67). Robotic approaches resulted in independently lower postoperative bleeding rates (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative bleeding occurs in 1.5% of patients undergoing a LRYGB and is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality. We have identified patient and operative factors that are independently associated with postoperative bleeding.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy has a Lower Risk of Postoperative Bleeding Than Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Measures to reduce postoperative bleeding (POB) after bariatric surgery is skewed toward laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). We use 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) to characterize the differences in bleeding rates between LSG and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses (LRYGB). Propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regressions tested for independent differences in POB rates. A total of 168,093 patients from 742 centers were identified in the data set. After selection 36,925 patients with LRYGB and 20,020 patients with LSG were included in the analysis. A total of 710 (1.25%) patient suffered a POB. The independent odds of POB were 38% lower for patients having LSG compared with those having LRYGB (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval=0.51-0.76). This difference is more pronounced with intraoperative securing of the staple line. Appropriate measures to reduce POB after each type of bariatric procedure is warranted.

Randomized controlled trial of monopolar cautery versus clips for staple line bleeding control in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Bleeding from the staple line is a rare but serious problem following bariatric surgery. Staple line bleeding control (SLBC) can be achieved in different ways such as the application of sutures, clips, glue or buttressing materials over the staple line. Cauterization alone is generally not preferred due to concerns about debilitating the staple line.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the clip and monopolar cauterization methods for SLBC in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

SETTING

University hospital.

METHODS

A total of 70 morbidly obese patients were randomized into two groups. Patients with previous upper gastrointestinal surgery, re-do procedures and open surgeries were excluded. Their demographic characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 489 SLBC interventions (274 clips and 215 cauterizations) were performed after 280 stapling applications. SLBC intervention number and location, additional trocar requirement, blood loss and operation time were not different between the groups. In the clip group, two patients required monopolar cauterization when clipping failed. No intraabdominal bleeding or gastrointestinal leakage was seen in any group. Postoperative gastrointestinal hemorrhage was seen in three patients, two in the clip group and one in the cautery group. There was no difference between the groups in terms of postoperative pain score, abdominal drainage amount, hemoglobin level alteration, morbidity or length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

In laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, monopolar cauterization for SLBC can be used instead of clipping. It appears that monopolar cautery is a safe and effective approach for SLBC in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

A Narrative of Intraoperative Staple Line Leaks and Bleeds During Bariatric Surgery

The primary objective of this review was to assess the incidence of intraoperative staple line leaks and bleeds during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE™, and Biosis from January 2010 to November 2014, plus secondary citations extending to 2008, identified 16 relevant articles. For LSG, the incidence of intraoperative leaks and bleeds was as high as 3.93 and 4.07 %, respectively. For LRYGB, leaks occurred in up to 8.26 % and bleeds in 3.45 % of cases. Stapler misfire was commonly cited as a cause. Widespread, precautionary use of staple line reinforcement (SLR), lack of standardized testing, and underreporting suggest the incidence may be underestimated. Published studies were insufficient to address the economic impact of bleeds and leaks or interventions, but development of improved stapler designs that obviate the need for SLR may reduce costs and improve outcomes.

Buttressing of the EEA stapler during gastrojejunal anastomosis decreases rate of bleeding-related complications for laparoscopic gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for severe obesity. Newer surgical techniques and equipment have improved safety standards surrounding bariatric surgery. In particular, buttressing of the staple line in sleeve gastrectomy has decreased rates of clinically significant postoperative bleeding. The present study investigates the effectiveness of buttressing the circular stapled anastomosis during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB).

SETTING

Academic, accredited hospital.

METHODS

A total of 253 patients undergoing LRYGB at a single academic institution were included in this retrospective study between 2014 and 2015. Buttressing material was used in 125 of these cases. Demographic information was collected from both groups preoperatively. Surgical characteristics were also obtained analyzed using unpaired t or χ² tests.

RESULTS

Patients in both buttressing and nonbuttressing groups were on average 46 years old and predominantly female (79.2% versus 74.2% female, respectively), with a body mass index of approximately 48 kg/m². Postoperative weight loss did not significantly differ between groups at any time point (buttressing versus nonbuttressing percentage of excess weight loss: 39.5% versus 41.5% at 3 mo, P = .3860; 56.4% versus 56.7% at 6 mo, P = .9341). There were no significant differences for operating time, length of stay, readmissions, or reoperations. Complications due to strictures were found to be lower for the buttressing group (0% buttressing versus 2.3% nonbuttressing, P = .0851). Specific rates of bleeding-related complications were significantly lower for the group in which buttressing was used (0% buttressing versus 3.1% nonbuttressing, P = .0463).

CONCLUSION

Buttressing of the gastrojejunal anastomosis during LRYGB significantly reduces bleeding-related complications and increases tolerability of the procedure.

Meta-analysis of hand-sewn versus mechanical gastrojejunal anastomosis during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is one of the most performed bariatric procedures in treating morbid obesity. There is no consensus on which technique used for gastrojejunal anastomosis is optimal. The meta-analysis aimed to solve the issue by comparing hand-sewn with mechanical gastrojejunostomy during LRYGB for morbid obesity.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Google Scholar and Research Gate were searched (from inception to April 2016). Primary outcome was operation time. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications (anastomotic leak, stricture, bleeding, marginal ulcer and wound infection), percent excess weight loss during one-year follow-up, reoperation, and postoperative hospital stay. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes.

RESULTS

Twelve trials were included comprising 13,626 patients (3309 hand-sewn vs. 6791 circular vs. 3526 linear). There was no difference in operation time when hand-sewn anastomosis was compared with mechanical gastrojejunostomy (MD, -6.00; 95% confidence interval (CI), -34.85 to 22.85; P = 0.68), circular stapled anastomosis (MD, -5.24; 95% CI, -32.71 to 22.24; P = 0.71) or linear stapled anastomosis (MD, - 3.75; 95% CI, -64.81 to 57.31; P = 0.90). Hand-sewn anastomosis had significantly lower incidence rate of postoperative bleeding (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.31-0.74; P = 0.001) and wound infection (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.08-0.45; P = 0.0002) than circular stapled anastomosis; there were no significant differences in the other secondary outcome. And there were no significant differences in all the comparable outcomes between hand-sewn anastomosis and linear stapled anastomosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis revealed no significant differences between mechanical and hand-sewn anastomosis except for greater incidence rates of postoperative bleeding and wound infection with the use of circular staplers. Besides, more trials with adequate power are required and a cost analysis also worth trying. REGISTRATION NO.

IN PROSPERO

CRD42015020025.

Clinical Benefit of Gastric Staple Line Reinforcement (SLR) in Gastrointestinal Surgery: a Meta-analysis

Background

The objective of this study was to assess whether the use of staple line reinforcement (SLR) reduces staple line complications (SLC). Mechanical staple lines are essential for gastrointestinal surgery such as bariatric surgery. However, SLC, such as bleeding and leakage, still occur. The purposes of this study were to provide quantitative evidence on the relative efficacy of gastric SLR and to compare the rates of effectiveness of three commonly used methods.

Methods

A search of the medical literature in English language journals identified studies from Jan 1, 2000, to Dec 31, 2013, using the following reinforcement types: (1) no reinforcement, (2) oversewing, (3) a biocompatible glycolide copolymer, and (4) bovine pericardium after gastric bypasses and sleeve gastrectomies. Types of reinforcement were compared using a random-effects model.

Results

This meta-analysis reviewed 16,967 articles, extracting data on 56,309 patients concerning leak and 41,864 patients concerning bleeding. Over 40 % of patients had no reinforcement, resulting in the highest leak rate (2.75 %) and bleed rate (3.45 %). Overall, reinforcing with bovine pericardium had the lowest leak (1.28 %) and bleed (1.23 %) rates. Suture oversewing was better than no reinforcement but not as effective as bovine pericardium for leak (2.45 %) and bleed (2.69 %) rates. Buttressing with a biocompatible glycolide copolymer resulted in the second highest leak rate (2.61 %) and a bleed rate of 2.48 % but had significantly lower bleed rates than no reinforcement.

Conclusions

SLR provided superior results for patients compared to no reinforcement for reducing SLC. Buttressing with bovine pericardium resulted in the most favorable outcomes. The effectiveness of different methods used to reinforce the staple line in gastric surgery does not appear to be equal.

Buttressing the staple line: a randomized comparison between staple-line reinforcement versus no reinforcement during sleeve gastrectomy

Bariatric surgery is recommended for Indian patients with body mass index (BMI) >32.5 kg/m² with at least one comorbidity and >37.5 kg/m² without a comorbidity. In laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, bleeding and leakage from the staple line are common post-operative events. Peri-Strips Dry® with Veritas® (PSD-V) is used in staple-line reinforcement. This was a single-investigator, multicenter, randomized study of 100 patients undergoing standard sleeve gastrectomy with a 34 or 36 French bougie. Patients were randomized 1:1 to PSD-V or control groups; no buttress material was used in the control group. The primary objective was to assess complication rates (any staple-line bleed or leak from the intra-operative visit through day 30) associated with sleeve gastrectomy. Surgical time (from first incision to closure of last incision) and the number of clips and/or sutures used to control bleeding were also assessed. Fewer staple-line bleeds were observed in the PSD-V group than the control group (23/51 [45.1 %] vs 39/49 [79.6 %] patients; p = 0.0005), and the bleeding was of a lower severity (p = 0.0002). No staple-line leaks were observed. Surgical time was shorter in patients who received PSD-V (58.8 vs 72.8 min; p = 0.0153), and fewer patients required hemostatic clips and/or sutures (10/51 [19.6 %] vs 33/49 [67.3 %] patients; p < 0.0001). Fewer patients in the PSD-V than the control group experienced adverse events (2/51 [3.9 %] vs 5/49 [10.2 %] patients). The use of PSD-V reduced the incidence and severity of staple-line bleeding and was associated with a reduction in surgical time compared with no staple-line reinforcement.

Staple line/anastomotic reinforcement and other adjuncts: do they make a difference?

Since the development of the stapled intestinal anastomosis, efforts have been aimed at reducing complications and standardizing methods. The main complications associated with stapled anastomoses include bleeding, device failure, and anastomotic failure (leaks and strictures). These complications are associated with increased cost of care, increase in cancer recurrence, decreased overall survival, poor quality of life, and in some cases the need for further procedures including a diverting ostomy. Reducing these complications therefore has important implications. To this end, techniques to reduce the incidence of anastomotic complications have been the focus of many investigators. In this review, we summarize the current staple line reinforcement technology as well as other adjunctive measures, and specifically discuss the role of biologic materials in this realm.

Integrated bioabsorbable tissue reinforcement in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Division of the stomach in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy may be performed using bare stapler cartridges or cartridges fitted with tissue reinforcement strips, with or without oversewing. Many tissue reinforcement strips are after-market add-on products that must be fitted onto a stapler during surgery. A retrospective review was conducted of 85 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using a novel integrated bioabsorbable polymer buttress pre-mounted on a single-use loading unit stapler. Mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 41.7 ± 5.2 kg/m(2). Morbidity and short-term outcomes were documented. Mean follow-up was 8.1 ± 3.6 months (range, 1.0-16.2 months). There were no mortalities or staple line leaks noted in this series with short-term follow up. The major complication rate (grade III and above) was 7.1% and included: reoperation for staple line bleeding (2.4%, n = 2), gastric sleeve stenosis requiring balloon dilation (2.4%, n = 2), choledocholithiasis 2 weeks after surgery (1.2%, n = 1), and reoperation without abnormality for suspected perioperative obstruction (1.2%, n = 1). Mean percent excess BMI loss at 3 (44.6 ± 11.3), 6 (57.9 ± 17.2), and 12 months (72.4 ± 27.5) was comparable to other published series. The use of an integrated absorbable synthetic polymer for stapled tissue reinforcement in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy appears to be feasible and safe, and yields results consistent with other published techniques.

Is bariatric surgery safe in patients who refuse blood transfusion?

BACKGROUND

A small, but significant, number of patients undergoing bariatric surgery refuse blood transfusion for religious or other personal reasons. Jehovah's Witnesses number more than 1 million members in the United States alone. The reported rates of hemorrhage vary from .5% to 4% after bariatric surgery, with transfusion required in one half of these cases. Pharmacologic prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism could further increase the perioperative bleeding risk. Our objective was to report the perioperative outcomes of bariatric surgery who refuse blood transfusion at a bariatric center of excellence, private practice in the United States.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who refused blood transfusion when undergoing bariatric surgery during a 10-year period was conducted. Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database by the bloodless surgery program at Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital. Data were collected on demographics, co-morbidities, laboratory values, medication use, blood loss, and 30-day complications.

RESULTS

Thirty-five bloodless surgery patients underwent bariatric surgery from 2000 to 2009. Of these 35 patients, 21 underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and 14 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Before 2006, only pneumatic compression devices were applied for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (n = 6). Subsequently, combination venous thromboembolism prophylaxis was performed with fondaparinux sodium 2.5 mg for RYGB or enoxaparin 40 mg for LAGB (n = 29). One RYGB patient developed postoperative hemorrhage requiring reoperation. No venous thromboembolisms or deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery can be performed in patients who refuse blood transfusion with acceptable postoperative morbidity. Larger studies are necessary to confirm the safety of this approach and to examine the effect of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in this patient group.

Comparison of Staple-Line Leakage and Hemorrhage in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy with or Without Seamguard

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been recognized as a primary procedure for the surgical management of morbid obesity. Staple-line leaks and hemorrhage are two associated complications. Staple-line buttressing materials have been suggested to decrease these complications. When used during LSG, few published papers exist that compare the incidence of leak or hemorrhage to that of nonreinforced staple-lines. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of leak and hemorrhage in patients who did and did not receive reinforcement with Seamguard (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ). This is a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing LSG. All patients met National Institutes of Health criteria and each had an extensive preoperative evaluation. Data was collected from inpatient and outpatient medical records. Fifty-nine patients received reinforcement and 80 patients did not. There was no significant difference in mean body mass index, age, or gender make-up between the two groups. The overall incidence of leak was 3.60 per cent. The incidence was 3.39 per cent in patients who received reinforcement and 3.75 per cent in those who did not. This was not statistically significant. There was no incidence of staple-line hemorrhage in either group. There is no conclusive evidence that Seamguard reduces staple-line leakage or hemorrhage. Studies involving a larger number of patients are necessary before recommending staple-line reinforcement.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: our first 100 patients

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy appears to be a safe, reproducible method to manage morbidly obese patients.

Background:

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is becoming a popular procedure for the morbidly obese patient. Its utilization as a standalone procedure has good results with weight loss in short- and midterm reports. The aim of this study was to assess our technique and whether it warranted any modifications in the early postoperative period.

Methods:

Our first 100 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Data analysis was conducted at 3 and 6 months to assess the percentage of excess body weight loss and comorbidity status change.

Results:

The percentage of excess body weight loss at the 3- and 6-month marks was 34.2% and 49.1%, respectively. Comorbidities were also improved at the 3- and 6-month marks. Hypertension resolved in 38%, hyperlipidemia resolved in 19%, and diabetes in 46%. Complication rate during the first 6 months was 10%. Major complications included 2 patients with postoperative bleeding, 2 patients with acute renal failure from dehydration, and 1 postoperative bleeding patient who developed a gastric fistula. No surgical reintervention was required for any complication.

Conclusion:

Our technique is a safe method that is easily reproducible and does not require any modification. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is an excellent surgical option with a low complication rate.

Prospective comparative study of the efficacy of staple-line reinforcement in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Staple-line reinforcement has been used with promising results in laparoscopic gastric bypass in order to reduce leakage, increase staple-line integrity, and diminish staple-site bleeding. The purpose of this study was to determine if staple-line reinforcement with bovine pericardial strips reduces surgical complications of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

METHODS

This is a prospective comparative study of all patients who underwent LSG by a standard operative team in an 18-month period. Patients were enrolled in group A if they received staple-line reinforcement and in group B when not. The staple line was reinforced with bovine pericardium strips [Peri-Strips Dry (PSD)].

RESULTS

In total, 187 patients, with a median preoperative BMI of 45.3 kg/m(2) (range = 35.1-72.7), underwent LSG. Ninety-six patients were enrolled in group A and 91 in group B; the two groups were comparable in their various characteristics. Morbidity rate representing grade III-IV surgical complications reached 7.4% and mortality rate was 0.5%. Reinforcement with PSD significantly reduced the occurrence of bleeding from the staple line and intra-abdominal collections (P = 0.012 and 0.026). The leak rate was not significantly reduced in group A. Patients in group A required fewer days of hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Reinforcement of the staple line in LSG resulted in significantly fewer surgical complications compared to standard stapling of the gastric tube. The additional cost due to the reinforcement of the staple line may be counterbalanced by the reduction in the length of hospitalization.

Effect of surgical techniques on clinical outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass--results from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative

BACKGROUND

The techniques used with laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGB) and their association with patient outcomes remain largely unexplored.

METHODS

We analyzed the data from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative, which maintains a state-wide prospective clinical registry of bariatric surgery patients. Participating surgeons were surveyed regarding their use of specific techniques during LGB. The survey data were linked with the registry data from patients undergoing LGB from June 2006 to January 2010. The gastrojejunostomy technique and the use of staple-line reinforcement were evaluated for their effects on patient outcomes.

RESULTS

During the study period, 9904 patients underwent LGB. A total of 44 surgeons (86%) completed the survey. When performing gastrojejunostomy, most surgeons used a circular stapler (CS) technique (66%), followed by the hand-sewn (HS) (18%) and linear stapler (LS) (16%). Also, 48% of surgeons reported using staple-line buttressing when creating the gastric pouch. The rate of anastomotic leak at the gastrojejunostomy was not affected by the surgical technique (CS .6%, LS .3%, HS .6%, P = .38). However, the CS technique was associated with a greater rate of postoperative hemorrhage (CS 2.9%, LS 1.2%, HS 1.6%, P <.0001) and wound infection (CS 4.7%, LS 1.6%, HS .6%, P <.0001). The use of staple-line reinforcement was associated with a lower rate of postoperative hemorrhage (1.9% versus 2.7%, P = .012).

CONCLUSION

With LGB, the use of the CS technique was associated with greater rates of postoperative hemorrhage and wound infection than the use of the LS or HS technique. Furthermore, the use of staple-line reinforcement was associated with a reduction in the rates of postoperative hemorrhage.

Clinical results using bioabsorbable staple-line reinforcement for circular stapler in colorectal surgery: a multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Anastomotic leakage is a serious postoperative complication of open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery, very often associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Despite proper patient selection and surgical technique, anastomotic leakage cannot be avoided. The use of a synthetic, bioabsorbable staple-line reinforcement material for the circular stapler may help reduce its prevalence.

METHODS

From May to December of 2006, 14 doctors, from 18 hospitals in the United States, performed 117 laparoscopic and open colorectal procedures, in which circular bioabsorbable Seamguard (CBSG; W.L. Gore and Associates, Elkton, MD) was used.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients underwent laparoscopic surgery (70.0%) and 34 open surgery (30%). The procedures included low anterior resection in 49 patients (42%), sigmoidectomy in 46 patients (39.5%), left hemicolectomy in 12 patients (10%), and total colectomy in 10 patients (8.5%). Sixty-four patients had benign disease and 36% malignant disease. Intraoperative anastomotic leakage tests identified 4 patients with leakage (3.4%). All 4 patients had a very low anastomosis (1, 3, 4, and 6 cm, respectively, from the anal verge). Two of the leaks resolved without further intervention. A fecal diversion procedure was performed in the other 2 patients, including 1 patient with rectal bleeding, requiring a transfusion. No clinical complications related to use of CBSG were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of Seamguard in colorectal open and laparoscopic surgery may result in a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage.

Gastrointestinal bleeding after gastric bypass surgery: nuisance or catastrophe?

BACKGROUND

Bleeding in the early postoperative period after gastric bypass surgery is a rare complication reported in 1-4% of cases. In most cases, the bleeding will be self-limited, resolving after discontinuation of anticoagulation for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis. Occasionally, however, bleeding can be problematic, resulting in significant postoperative morbidity or even mortality. The purpose of the present study was to review cases of early postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding after gastric bypass to identify possible risk factors and examine outcomes.

METHODS

A prospective weight loss surgery patient database was reviewed to examine the cases occurring from January 2005 to July 2008. Patients with early postoperative bleeding were identified. The demographics and co-morbidities were compared between those with and without postoperative bleeding. The outcomes of interest included the transfusion requirement, postoperative morbidity, need for reoperation, length of hospital stay, intensive care unit admission, and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 776 patients had undergone gastric bypass during the study period. Of these, 26 (3.3%) were identified with early postoperative bleeding. No significant differences were found in the demographics between the patients with early postoperative bleed and those without. Of the patients with early postoperative bleeding, the most common presenting sign or symptom was tachycardia (46%) followed by melena (32%) and hematemesis (18%). The transfusion requirement range was 0-11 U (average 3.2 U/patient). Of the 26 patients, 4 (15%) required intensive care unit admission and 8 (31%) required reoperation. Four gastrointestinal leaks, one stomal ulceration, and one gastrogastric fistula were identified in the early postoperative bleeding group. One patient (3.8%) in the early postoperative bleeding group died. Compared with nonbleeding patients, those with early postoperative bleeding had a significantly longer hospital stay (4.8 versus 3, P <.0001) and greater mortality rate (7.1% versus .9%, P <.01).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative bleeding is a significant complication after gastric bypass surgery. Although in many cases, the bleeding will be self-limited, it can result in additional notable complications. In the present study, postoperative bleeding contributed to significantly longer hospital stays and resulted in 1 death. A patient with bleeding after gastric bypass should raise due concern, with attention to the potential attendant complications.

Effect of circular staple line buttressing material on gastrojejunostomy failure in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

To determine the effect of bovine pericardium strip (BPS) reinforcement of the circular stapler on the gastrojejunostomy leak rates and staple line failure after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) at a university hospital in the United States. Gastrojejunostomy leak after LRYGB is a devastating complication. Various techniques, including buttressing the gastrojejunostomy staple line with biomaterial, have been used in an effort to minimize leaks.

METHODS

A total of 350 consecutive patients underwent LRYGB without staple line buttressing. After this initial experience, BPS reinforcement of the gastrojejunostomy was conducted in 81 consecutive patients. BPS reinforcement was not used for the final 69 consecutive patients in this 500 patient series. Circular staple line failures (intraoperative immediate and complete failure of the anastomosis) and leaks were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

Three leaks (and no intraoperative staple line failures) occurred in 419 patients without BPS buttressing, all in the first 100 cases of our experience, and 3 leaks and an anastomotic staple line failure occurred in the 81 patients with BPS buttressing (.7% versus 4.9%, P = .02). The body mass index and other potential leak risk factors did not differ between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, buttressing of the circular staple line with BPS during LRYGB was associated with an increased staple line adverse event rate. BPS buttressing of the gastrointestinal circular staple lines should be used with caution.

A comparison of gastrojejunal anastomoses with or without buttressing in a porcine model

INTRODUCTION

The addition of staple-line reinforcements on circular anastomoses has not been well studied. We histologically and mechanically analyzed circular- stapled anastomoses with and without bioabsorbable staple-line reinforcement (SeamGuard, W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) in a porcine model.

METHODS

Gastrojejunal anastomoses were constructed using a #25 EEA Proximate ILS (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) mechanical stapling device with and without Bioabsorbable SeamGuard (BSG). Gastrojejunal anastomoses were resected acutely and at 1 week, and burst-pressure testing and histological analysis were performed. Standardized grading systems for inflammation, collagen deposition, vascularity, and serosal inflammation were used to compare the two anastomosis types.

RESULTS

Acute burst pressures were significantly higher with BSG than with staples alone (1.37 versus 0.39 psi, p=0.0075). Burst pressures at 1 week were significantly lower with BSG than with staples alone (2.24 versus 3.86 psi, p=0.0353); however, both readings were above normal physiologic intestinal pressures. There was no statistical difference in inflammation (13.4 versus 15.6, p=0.073), width of mucosa (3.2 mm versus 3.2 mm, p=0.974), adhesion formation (0 versus 0.5, p=0.575), number of blood vessels (0.5 versus 1.0, p=0.056), or serosal inflammation (2.0 versus 1.0, p=0.27) between the stapled anastomoses and those buttressed with BSG. Stapled-only anastomoses had statistically more collagen (2.0 versus 1.0, p=0.005) than the anastomoses supported with BSG.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of BSG as a staple-line reinforcement acutely improves the burst strength of a circular anastomosis but not at 1 week. At 1 week, a decrease in collagen content with the BSG-buttressed stapled anastomosis was the only difference in the histologic parameters studied with no difference in vascularity, adhesions, or inflammation. The long-term effect of BSG on anastomotic strength or scarring is yet to be determined. The clinical implications may include decreased stricture formation and also decreased strength at anastomoses.

Reinforcement does not necessarily reduce the rate of staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy. A review of the literature and clinical experiences

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is an accepted bariatric procedure, with an advantaged by a low complication rate. A feared complication is stapler line leak. Buttressing materials have been suggested as a means of reducing staple line leak rates. We analyzed the leak rates from published series to help in demonstrating a potential cause.

METHODS

The study was institutional review board (IRB) approved retrospectively. A Medline search using the key words sleeve gastrectomy and bariatric surgery obtained 54 articles. Attention was restricted to 11 articles written in English that listed numbers of gastrectomy procedures and leaks. Poisson regression assessed the possibility that patients who received buttressing materials had a reduced rate of leaks.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were evaluated from Greece (15) and the United States (20); two patients developed staple line leaks that appeared to be related to problems associated with buttressing materials. Eleven prior studies and the present series yielded 1,589 procedures, 15 (0.94%) of which were complicated by leaks. The leak rate for patients who were known to have received reinforcement of some sort was 1.45 (95% confidence interval 0.41-3.43) times that for other patients. To detect a difference between 1% and 0.5% as statistically significant in 80% of cases, with a two tailed test and alpha set at 0.05, would require 9,346 procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no reason to believe, at this point, that reduction in leak rates occur because reinforcement is used. Because the leak rate is small, the routine reinforcement of the staple line after sleeve gastrectomy is questionable at best, although a decrease in hemorrhage has been reported.

Early experience with intraluminal reinforcement of stapled gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

The use of extraluminal staple-line buttressing material during laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass has shown the potential to reduce staple-line leak and bleeding. We herein present our early experience with intraluminal reinforcement of linear-cutting stapled gastrojejunal anastomosis with the use of bioabsorbable glycolide copolymer staple-line reinforcement.

METHODS

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was performed in 80 consecutive non-randomized morbidly obese patients. Gastrojejunal anastomosis was performed using a linear-cutting stapler without staple-line reinforcement in 40 patients (group A), while in the other 40 patients (group B), gastrojejunostomy was performed using a linear cutting stapler with intraluminal reinforcement material (bioabsorbable glycolide copolymer). Demographic data were collected. The rate of gastrojejunal anastomotic leak, bleeding, and stricture was determined.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant reduction in bleeding complications between the two groups (15% bleeding in group A vs. no bleeding in group B, P value=0.0255). Stricture rate was higher in-group A (10% group A vs. 2.5% in group B); however, the difference was not statistically significant (P value=0.2007). None of our patients developed a gastrojejunal leak.

CONCLUSION

Intraluminal reinforcement of gastrojejunal anastomosis during laparoscopic gastric bypass is safe and feasible. The use of intraluminal bioabsorbable glycolide copolymer staple-line reinforcement significantly reduces the incidence of gastrojejunal bleeding.

Comparison of permanent and nonpermanent staple line buttressing materials for linear gastric staple lines during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Several publications have suggested that staple line buttressing might decrease staple line bleeding, increase burst pressure, and decrease the likelihood of acute failure resulting in leak. Currently, permanent and nonpermanent options are available. However, concern has been raised about the permanent buttress material and its potential for delayed strip expulsion. This study analyzed our experience with 3 different buttressing materials for creating the gastric division during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

METHODS

From July 5, 2001 to May 30, 2007, 1451 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass with buttressing material used for the stapled creation of the gastric pouch. Peristrips Dry (PSDs), permanent bovine pericardial strips, were used in 926 cases from July 5, 2001 to October 11, 2005. Seamguards, a synthetic bioabsorbable product, were used in 145 cases from November 2, 2004 to July 18, 2006, and PSD Veritas, remodelable, nonpermanent bovine pericardial strips, were placed in 380 patients from October 11, 2005 to May 30, 2007. All products were applied to the 60-mm-long, 3.5-mm cartridges of the EndoGIA II stapler. The ease of use, operative complications, visual bleeding, and postoperative leaks were recorded.

RESULTS

The patient characteristics were comparable for all groups. All products were easy to load on the stapler, and no operative complications related to the use of the buttress materials occurred. The incidence and severity of staple line bleeding was not specifically calculated but was visually noted to be minimal in all cases. Of the 3 groups, 4 contained leaks occurred in the Seamguards group, and all were successfully managed nonoperatively. No acute leaks were discovered in the PSD or PSD Veritas groups. This difference was statistically significant (p <.001).

CONCLUSION

Neither the PSDs or PSD Veritas group exhibited staple line complications. However, 4 leaks occurred in the patients who had Seamguards incorporated into their gastric pouch linear staple lines.

Bioabsorbable glycolide copolymer staple-line reinforcement decreases internal hernia rate after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Internal hernias (IHs) can occur after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP), perhaps because of a lack of adhesion formation at the cut edges of the mesentery and a cutting through of sutures with a decrease in fat from weight loss. In patients undergoing reoperation after LRYGBP, we observed that bioabsorbable glycolide copolymer staple-line reinforcement (SLR) placed to mitigate staple-line bleeding had evoked adhesiogenesis and tissue fusion at the mesentery edges; therefore, we investigated whether use of this material decreases post-LRYGBP IH rates.

METHODS

The records of the 43 patients (3%) in whom an IH developed during a mean follow-up time of 2 years in a series of 1,704 LRYGBP procedures were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The IHs were in the Peterson's space (n = 4), the enteroenterostomy (n = 17), or the transverse mesocolon (n = 22). The IH rate was significantly higher in patients who had suture closure of the mesenteric defects at LRYGBP than in those without formal closure of the defects but in whom SLR was applied to the edges of the cut mesentery (P = 0.01). The suture-closure and SLR groups had similar demographic, operative, and follow-up characteristics. When transverse mesocolic IHs were excluded from analysis, patients given SLR remained less likely to have an IH (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Use of bioabsorbable polymer SLR may decrease the occurrence of IHs after LRYGBP. Additional studies of the effect of mesentery closure method on IH incidence after LRYGBP are warranted.

Effects of the time interval between clamping and linear stapling for resection of porcine small intestine

BACKGROUND

Although a wait of several seconds after clamping is recommended when an automatic stapler is used to achieve adequate hemostasis, this wait has not been experimentally clarified.

METHODS

To determine whether waiting is necessary between clamping and firing of a linear stapler, this study evaluated the number of staple line bleeding points and histologic changes in stapling sites of porcine small intestine (n = 46). It also assessed the ratio of dry to wet tissue weight (DW ratio) (n = 20) of porcine small intestine clamped between the prongs of a linear stapler. The sites were studied separately as follows: no wait with a four-row device (n = 12), no wait with a six-row device (n = 11), wait with a four-row device (n = 12), and wait with a six-row device (n = 11). The linear stapler was fired immediately after clamping in the no wait group and 1 min after clamping in the wait group.

RESULTS

The mean number of staple line bleeding points in 2 to 5 min with the six-row device and in 3 to 5 min with the four-row device after firing were significantly less in the wait group than in the no wait group using the same device (p < 0.05). Cross sections of staple lines showed a higher frequency of mucosal cutting in the no wait group than in the wait group for both the four-row and the six-row devices (both significant at p < 0.01). Although the mean wet tissue weights of anastomotic sites did not change in either group, the mean DW ratio was significantly less in the wait group than in the no wait group (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A 1-min interval after clamping decreases the amount of clamped tissue. Waiting may thus be necessary to reduce bleeding from stapling sites, which may be related to a decrease in mucosal cutting.

Use of bioabsorbable staple reinforcement material in gastric bypass: a prospective randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Staple line failure, although uncommon, can result in significant morbidity and, even, mortality. Staple line buttressing has been developed to improve staple line strength, decrease bleeding, and minimize the risk of leak. Many different products are currently available. However, most have not been proved in clinical trials for their clinical relevance.

METHODS

From April 2004 to March 2005, 48 morbidly obese patients who had undergone laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups according to whether polyglycolide acid and trimethylene carbonate (Seamguard) was (group 1, n = 24) or was not (group 2, n = 24) used in an investigator-initiated study. All patients underwent barium radiography at 3 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Peri- and postoperative mortality were absent. The intraoperative methylene blue test was positive in 1 patient in group 2. No conversion to laparotomy was needed. No patient required reoperation or transfusion for extraluminal bleeding, and no anastomotic leaks were detected in either group postoperatively. The mean number of clip instruments used was significantly lower in group 1 patients (2 versus 22, P <.0001, odds ratio 121.0, 95% confidence interval 12.5-1491). The operative time was significantly less in group 1 (115 +/- 30.0 min, range 85-210) compared with that in group 2 (150 +/- 51.7 min, range 90-240; P <.05). The postoperative hemoglobin level was significantly greater in group 1 (12.47 +/- 1.7 mg/dL, range 9.2-14.8) compared with that in group 2 (11.1 +/- 1.9 mg/dL, range 8.1-14.6; P <.05). Gastrogastric fistula formation was detected in 3 patients (12.5%) in group 2, with no statistically significant difference (P = .2).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study have shown that synthetic reinforcement material minimizes staple line bleeding and reduces the operative time, with no animal source contamination. No adverse events related to the resorbable buttressing material were observed.

Staple-line reinforcement with bovine pericardium in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: experimental comparative study in pigs

BACKGROUND

We studied the usefulness of Bovine Pericardial strips (BPS) as a buttress in the prevention of complications from the gastric staple-line in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

METHODS

LSG was carried out in 18 pigs. Resection of the stomach was performed with 4.8-mm/30-mm linear stapler either without (Control Group--n = 9) or with BPS (Buttress Group--n = 9). Intra- and postoperative blood losses were assessed. Leaks were evaluated with methylene blue test intra-operatively and then clinically. The animals were sacrificed 2 weeks after surgery and the abdominal cavity was evaluated for fluid collections and adhesions, and the burst pressure of the stomach was measured and histopathological study of the staple-line was performed. Student t-test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

No leaks were detected except for one small subclinical leak in the buttress group. Internal ulcers at the staple-line were seen more frequently in the Buttress group (6 vs 3, not significant). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regards to operative time (65.3 +/- 14.2 min, 69.7 +/- 12.8 min), intra-operative bleeding (9.6 +/- 2.2 ml, 8.2 +/- 1.5 ml), postoperative hemoglobin levels (11.3 +/- 1.9 g%, 11.8 +/- 2.2 g%), and burst pressure (152.6 +/- 23.5 mmHg, 161.2 +/- 15.8 mmHg) for the Control and Buttress groups respectively. More intense adhesions and inflammatory response were observed in the Buttress Group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this experimental model, the use of bovine pericardium as a staple-line buttress in LSG was easy and safe; however, it did not decrease the occurrence of complications.

Staple line reinforcement with new biomaterial increased burst strength pressure: an animal study

BACKGROUND

Most bariatric operations rely on stapler devices. Although today staplers are extremely safe, efficient, and reliable, a potential risk exists for staple line failures, leading to three complications: leaks, fistulas, and bleeding. Porcine small intestinal submucosa strip applied over the staple line suture might help prevent these problems.

METHODS

Forty animals (canine model developed at the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) underwent general anesthesia and laparotomy. One nonreinforced staple line suture and one staple line suture reinforced with Surgisis SLR was created in each animal. The burst strength pressure of the 80 staple line sutures was obtained. Suture line bleeding and the ease of use of the membrane were also noted. The data were compared (Student's t test). The dogs were euthanized after the procedure. Two surgeons with experience in stapler devices performed all procedures.

RESULTS

The mean +/- SD burst pressure was 209.26 +/- 76.41 mm Hg and 441.33 +/- 128.64 mm Hg for the stapler line without and with the biodegradable membrane, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P = .002). No in vivo suture line bleeding occurred. The biodegradable membrane was easy to use.

CONCLUSION

The biodegradable membrane was able to increase the burst strength pressure of the bowel segment staple line. It might help prevent some causes of staple line leaks.