Elective cyclosporine withdrawal after renal transplantation. A meta-analysis

Immunologic Risk Assessment and Approach to Immunosuppression Regimen in Kidney Transplantation

The outcomes of kidney transplantation show a steady improvement with an increasing number of transplantations and decreasing incidence of acute rejection episodes. Successful transplantation begins with a comprehensive immunologic risk assessment and judicious choice of therapeutic agents. In this review, we discuss the trends in transplant immunosuppression practices and outcomes in the United States. We discuss practical testing algorithms for clinical decision making in induction therapy and fine-tuning maintenance immunosuppression. We introduce assessment tools for immune monitoring after transplantation and speculate on future directions in management.

Reducing Adverse Effects of Immunosuppressive Agents in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Success in solid organ transplantation with minimal complications can now be achieved for most patients, and a remarkable rate of graft and patient survival can also be expected. However, the potential for adverse events and comorbid conditions increases with longer graft survival. Although the immunosuppressive regimen is central to the outcome of the transplant recipient and directly impacts the survival of the graft, chronic use of immunosuppressive agents is associated with metabolic disturbances such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, loss of bone density, nephrotoxicity, and diabetes, which may contribute to other comorbid conditions. In addition, changes in appearance, gingival hyperplasia, hirsutism, alopecia, and weight gain disrupt quality of life and may lead to noncompliance with the immunosuppressive regimen. New immunosuppressive medications, including mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus, basiliximab, and daclizumab, have allowed for experimentation with new regimens designed to reduce or allow discontinuation of corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors. This review highlights the impact and cost of immunosuppressive side effects and the potential for new immunosuppressive regimens to reduce this substantial clinical burden in transplantation.

Adverse Outcomes of Tacrolimus Withdrawal in Immune-Quiescent Kidney Transplant Recipients

Concerns about adverse effects of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have prompted development of protocols that minimize their use. Whereas previous CNI withdrawal trials in heterogeneous cohorts showed unacceptable rates of acute rejection (AR), we hypothesized that we could identify individuals capable of tolerating CNI withdrawal by targeting immunologically quiescent kidney transplant recipients. The Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-09 Trial was a randomized, prospective study of nonsensitized primary recipients of living donor kidney transplants. Subjects received rabbit antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Six months post-transplantation, subjects without de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), AR, or inflammation at protocol biopsy were randomized to wean off or remain on tacrolimus. The intended primary end point was the change in interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy score between implantation and 24-month protocol biopsies. Serially collected urine CXCL9 ELISA results were correlated with outcomes. The study was terminated prematurely because of unacceptable rates of AR (4 of 14) and/or de novo DSAs (5 of 14) in the tacrolimus withdrawal arm. Positive urinary CXCL9 predated clinical detection of AR by a median of 15 days. Analyses showed that >16 HLA-DQ epitope mismatches and pretransplant, peripheral blood, donor-reactive IFN-γ ELISPOT assay results correlated with development of DSAs and/or AR on tacrolimus withdrawal. Although data indicate that urinary CXCL9 monitoring, epitope mismatches, and ELISPOT assays are potentially informative, complete CNI withdrawal must be strongly discouraged in kidney transplant recipients who are receiving standard-of-care immunosuppression, including those who are deemed to be immunologically quiescent on the basis of current clinical and laboratory criteria.

Calcineurin inhibitor sparing strategies in renal transplantation, part one: Late sparing strategies

Kidney transplantation improves quality of life and reduces the risk of mortality. A majority of the success of kidney transplantation is attributable to the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), cyclosporine and tacrolimus, and their ability to reduce acute rejection rates. However, long-term graft survival rates have not improved over time, and although controversial, evidence does suggest a role of chronic CNI toxicity in this failure to improve outcomes. Consequently, there is interest in reducing or removing CNIs from immunosuppressive regimens in an attempt to improve outcomes. Several strategies exist to spare calcineurin inhibitors, including use of agents such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mycophenolate sodium (MPS), sirolimus, everolimus or belatacept to facilitate late calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal, beyond 6 mo post-transplant; or using these agents to plan early withdrawal within 6 mo; or to avoid the CNIs all together using CNI-free regimens. Although numerous reviews have been written on this topic, practice varies significantly between centers. This review organizes the data based on patient characteristics (i.e., the baseline immunosuppressive regimen) as a means to aid the practicing clinician in caring for their patients, by matching up their situation with the relevant literature. The current review, the first in a series of two, examines the potential of immunosuppressive agents to facilitate late CNI withdrawal beyond 6 mo post-transplant, and has demonstrated that the strongest evidence resides with MMF/MPS. MMF or MPS can be successfully introduced/maintained to facilitate late CNI withdrawal and improve renal function in the setting of graft deterioration, albeit with an increased risk of acute rejection and infection. Additional benefits may include improved blood pressure, lipid profile and serum glucose. Sirolimus has less data directly comparing CNI withdrawal to an active CNI-containing regimen, but modest improvement in short-term renal function is possible, with an increased risk of proteinuria, especially in the setting of baseline renal dysfunction and/or proteinuria. Renal outcomes may be improved when sirolimus is used in combination with MMF. Although data with everolimus is less robust, results appear similar to those observed with sirolimus.

Is it time to give up with calcineurin inhibitors in kidney transplantation?

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) represent today a cornerstone for the maintenance immunosuppressive treatment in solid organ transplantation. Nevertheless, several attempts have been made either to minimize their dosage or to avoid CNIs at all because these drugs have the severe side effect of chronic nephrotoxicity. This issue represents a frontier for renal transplantation. The principal problem is to understanding whether the poor outcome over the long-term may be ascribed to CNIs nephrotoxicity or to the inability of these drugs to control the acute and chronic rejection B cells mediated. The authors analyze extensively all the international trials attempting to withdraw, minimize or avoid the use of CNIs. Few trials undertaken in low risk patients with an early conversion from CNIs to proliferation signal inhibitors were successful, but the vast majority of trials failed to improve CNIs side effects. To date the use of a new drug, a co-stimulation blocker, seems promising in avoiding CNIs with similar efficacy, better glomerular filtration rate and an improved metabolic profile. Moreover the use of this drug is not associated with the development of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies. This point has a particular relevance, because the failure of CNIs to realize good outcomes in renal transplantation has recently ascribed to their inability to control the acute and chronic rejections B-cell mediated. This paper analyzes all the recent studies that have been done on this issue that represents the real frontier that should be overcome to realize better results over the long-term after transplantation.

Meta-analysis of calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimens in kidney transplantation

Calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing strategies in kidney transplantation may spare patients the adverse effects of these drugs, but the efficacy of these strategies is unknown. Here, we conduct a meta-analysis to assess outcomes associated with reducing calcineurin inhibitor exposure from the time of transplantation. We search Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2010 that compared de novo calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimens to calcineurin-inhibitor-based regimens. In this analysis, we include 56 studies comprising data from 11337 renal transplant recipients. Use of the contemporary agents belatacept or tofacitinib, in combination with mycophenolate, decreased the odds of overall graft failure (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.39-0.96; P = 0.03). Similarly, minimization of calcineurin inhibitors in combination with various induction and adjunctive agents reduces the odds of graft failure (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.58-0.92; P = 0.009). Conversely, the use of inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), in combination with mycophenolate, increases the odds of graft failure (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.08-1.90; P = 0.01). Calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing strategies are associated with less delayed graft function (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.80-0.98; P = 0.02), improved graft function, and less new-onset diabetes. The more contemporary protocols did not seem to increase rates of acute rejection. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that reducing exposure to calcineurin inhibitors immediately after kidney transplantation may improve clinical outcomes.

Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials

BACKGROUND

Randomised trials use the play of chance to assign participants to comparison groups. The unpredictability of the process, if not subverted, should prevent systematic differences between comparison groups (selection bias). Differences due to chance will still occur and these are minimised by randomising a sufficiently large number of people.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of randomisation and concealment of allocation on the results of healthcare studies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Methodology Register, MEDLINE, SciSearch and reference lists up to September 2009. In addition, we screened articles citing included studies (ISI Science Citation Index) and papers related to included studies (PubMed).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible study designs were cohorts of studies, systematic reviews or meta-analyses of healthcare interventions that compared random allocation versus non-random allocation or adequate versus inadequate/unclear concealment of allocation in randomised trials. Outcomes of interest were the magnitude and direction of estimates of effect and imbalances in prognostic factors.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We retrieved and assessed studies that appeared to meet the inclusion criteria independently. At least two review authors independently appraised methodological quality and extracted information. We prepared tabular summaries of the results for each comparison and assessed the results across studies qualitatively to identify common trends or discrepancies.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 18 studies (systematic reviews or meta-analyses) met our inclusion criteria. Ten compared random allocation versus non-random allocation and nine compared adequate versus inadequate or unclear concealment of allocation within controlled trials. All studies were at high risk of bias.For the comparison of randomised versus non-randomised studies, four comparisons yielded inconclusive results (differed between outcomes or different modes of analysis); three comparisons showed similar results for random and non-random allocation; two comparisons had larger estimates of effect in non-randomised studies than in randomised trials; and two comparisons had larger estimates of effect in randomised than in non-randomised studies.Five studies found larger estimates of effect in trials with inadequate concealment of allocation than in trials with adequate concealment. The four other studies did not find statistically significant differences.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of randomised and non-randomised studies sometimes differed. In some instances non-randomised studies yielded larger estimates of effect and in other instances randomised trials yielded larger estimates of effect. The results of controlled trials with adequate and inadequate/unclear concealment of allocation sometimes differed. When differences occurred, most often trials with inadequate or unclear allocation concealment yielded larger estimates of effects relative to controlled trials with adequate allocation concealment. However, it is not generally possible to predict the magnitude, or even the direction, of possible selection biases and consequent distortions of treatment effects from studies with non-random allocation or controlled trials with inadequate or unclear allocation concealment.

Minimizing immunosuppression, an alternative approach to reducing side effects: objectives and interim result

Exceptionally low acute rejection rates and excellent graft survival can be achieved with cyclosporine and tacrolimus (CNI)-based immunosuppressive protocols that incorporate antiproliferative immunosuppressants and corticosteroids. However, despite short-term success, long-term attrition of graft function and side effects of immunosuppressive agents continue to be significant problems, leaving clinicians looking for possible interventions. CNI nephrotoxicity is but one of numerous factors that may contribute to long-term damage in transplant kidneys. Metabolic, cosmetic, and neuropsychiatric complications of steroids affect quality of life after transplantation. Newer immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus (Rapa) have raised the possibility of withdrawing or avoiding CNIs or steroids altogether. In this report we review studies that address either CNI or steroid minimization strategies and discuss their risks versus benefits. Given the accumulated experience to date, in our opinion the use of CNIs and steroids as part of immunosuppressive regimens remains the proven standard of care for renal transplant patients. The long-term safety and efficacy of CNI and steroid minimization strategies needs to be further validated in controlled clinical trials with adequate long-term follow-up.

Calcineurin Inhibitor Reduction Based on Maintenance Immunosuppression With Mycophenolate Mofetil in Renal Transplant Patients: POP Study

Since calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have been introduced, they have become the cornerstone of immunosuppression for renal transplant patients, but their cardiovascular and neurological toxicities, and primarily their renal toxicity, have brought about an increased effort to find combinations of immunosuppressants that are either CNI-free or that use minimum doses of these drugs. The weight of immunosuppression therefore lies with drugs that have a better toxicity profile. The POP observational transverse study including 213 renal transplant patients was designed to study CNI minimization strategies. The mean time of transplant evolution to the time of reduction was 9.9 +/- 11.8 months. The acute rejection rate to the start of reduction was 9.4%. Almost all the patients were undergoing treatment with CNI + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + steroids in the immediate posttransplantation period. When reduction was chosen, all patients were undergoing treatment with MMF (mean dose at the start of reduction = 1490.7 +/- 478.0 mg/d). Among the cohort, 66.7% of patients were being treated with tacrolimus (mean C0 levels 13.3 +/- 6.6 ng/mL) and 33.3% with cyclosporine (mean C0 levels 192.2 +/- 94.0 ng/mL; mean C2 levels 1097.5 +/- 457.6). The main reasons for withdrawal were nephrotoxicity (55.9% of the cases), as well as prevention of adverse effects (21.6%). The mean target CNI dose reduction was 41.4% +/- 21.45% in the tacrolimus group and 28.6 +/- 10.0% in the cyclosporine group. In conclusion, CNI toxicity, primarily renal toxicity, makes reduction of these drugs based on the use of full MMF doses an alternative to manage renal transplant patients.

Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials

BACKGROUND

Randomised trials use the play of chance to assign participants to comparison groups. The unpredictability of the process, if not subverted, should prevent systematic differences between comparison groups (selection bias), provided that a sufficient number of people are randomised.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of randomisation and concealment of allocation on the results of healthcare trials.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Methodology Register, MEDLINE, SciSearch, reference lists up to August 2000 and used personal communication.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Cohorts of trials, systematic reviews or meta-analyses of healthcare interventions that compared outcomes or prognostic factors for one of the following comparisons: randomised versus non-randomised trials, randomised trials with adequately versus inadequately concealed allocation, or high versus low quality trials where selection bias could not be separated from other sources of bias.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One of us went through all of the citations in the Cochrane Methodology Register and accumulated reference lists. Studies that appeared to meet the inclusion criteria were retrieved and assessed independently by two of the reviewers. The methodological quality of included studies was appraised and information extracted by one of us and checked by a second. Tabular summaries of the results were prepared for each comparison and the results across studies were assessed qualitatively to identify common trends or discrepancies.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 32 studies including over 3000 trials. Twenty-two studies compared randomised versus non-randomised trials, three compared adequately versus inadequately concealed allocation, and nine compared high versus low quality trials (some studies included more than one comparison). Five studies were of high methodological quality. In 15 of the 22 studies that compared randomised and non-randomised trials of the same intervention, important differences were found in the estimates of effect. Some of these differences were due to a poorer prognosis in the control groups in the non-randomised trials. The results of the other seven studies that compared randomised and non-randomised trials across different interventions are less clear. Comparisons of adequately and inadequately concealed allocation in randomised trials of the same intervention provided high quality evidence that concealment can be crucial in achieving similar treatment groups and, therefore, unbiased estimates of treatment effects. Studies with inadequate concealment tended to overestimate treatment effects. Comparisons of high and low quality trials of the same intervention have found important differences in estimates of effect, but it is not possible to determine the extent to which these differences can be attributed to randomisation or concealment of allocation. Omitting comparisons between randomised trials and non-randomised trials using historical controls did not substantially alter the results or conclusions of our review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

On average, non-randomised trials and randomised trials with inadequate concealment of allocation tend to result in larger estimates of effect than randomised trials with adequately concealed allocation. However, it is not generally possible to predict the magnitude, or even the direction, of possible selection biases and consequent distortions of treatment effects.

Long-term kidney transplant outcomes in patients receiving oil-based or microemulsion formulations of cyclosporine

In the last 20 years long-term experience with cyclosporine use in kidney transplantation has increased, allowing a more precise identification of its benefits.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 1619 kidney transplants that received cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive therapy. Patients were divided into three groups (1) oil-based cyclosporine (SIM) with trough monitoring (GI, n=617); (2) microemulsion formulation (NEO) with trough monitoring (GII, n=962); and (3) NEO with C2 monitoring (GIII, n=40). Information was obtained on transplant demography; adjunctive immunosuppressive agent; living (LD) versus cadaveric (CAD) recipients; delayed graft function; any treated acute rejection; graft function at 3, 6, and 12 months, patient and graft survival, as well as causes of graft loss and death.

RESULTS

At 15 years follow-up, patient and graft survival were 67.5% and 41.6%, being superior, among LD versus CAD recipients (patient: 78.7% vs 57.7%, P<.001; graft: 56.4% vs 30.5%, P<.001). In LD (54% vs 32%, P<.001) and CAD (69% vs 55%, P<.001) NEO reduced the incidence of AR and improved 8-year patient (LD: 81.8% vs 94.7%; CAD: 66.4 vs 79.9%, P<.01) and graft survival (LD: 58.3 vs. 80%; CAD: 40.2% vs. 59.5%, P<.01), compared to SIM. Overall 8-year graft survival was inferior among patients with increased 1-year creatinine values (< or =1.5, 1.6-2.5 and >2.5 mg/dL) level (74% vs 63.9% vs 22.4%, P<.001) or change in Cr (< or =0.1, 0.2-0.4, >0.5 mg/dL) level (73.1% vs 61.9% vs 37.2%, P<.001). In patients at the same level of graft function, those receiving NEO showed superior 8-year patient and graft survival compared with SIM.

CONCLUSION

Compared to SIM, NEO reduced the incidence of acute rejection and produced superior long-term patient and graft survival.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Ciclosporin Withdrawal in Renal Transplant Recipients

Ciclosporin is associated with significant toxicity, including nephrotoxicity, and with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Many attempts have been made to wean patients from ciclosporin. Before the availability of new immunosuppressive drugs, the acute rejection rate observed after ciclosporin withdrawal did not permit the widespread use of withdrawal regimens even though meta-analysis did not show that they adversely affected patient or graft survival. Nevertheless, maintenance therapy with azathioprine and corticosteroids has not become routine practice. The introduction of mycophenolate mofetil and subsequently sirolimus has increased the number of clinical studies of the effects of ciclosporin withdrawal. In stable patients, this withdrawal is associated with a small but significant increase in the incidence of acute rejection episodes. Declining renal function and other forms of ciclosporin-related toxicity have improved. However, this improvement was also observed when ciclosporin was only reduced (and not withdrawn), which did not increase the risk of acute rejection. More precise definition of the patients who could benefit from ciclosporin-withdrawal may help to optimise the immunosuppressive regimen in this setting. In patients with chronic allograft deterioration, ciclosporin withdrawal together with mycophenolate mofetil introduction has been shown to improve renal function significantly in many small studies, and a large prospective randomised study. For the time being, ciclosporin withdrawal is a good therapeutic option for patients with declining renal function and signs of chronic ciclosporin nephrotoxicity on renal biopsy. Finally, recent preliminary studies have reported the results of complete avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors after renal transplantation. These results are promising as regards the incidence of acute rejection, renal function and safety, but need confirmation in larger trials with a longer follow-up. Nevertheless, it has become clear that the concept of an immunosuppressive regimen with little or no nephrotoxicity after renal transplantation is more and more important and plays a crucial part in tailoring immunosuppression to the needs of specific patient populations.

Use of sirolimus to facilitate cyclosporine avoidance or steroid withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients

Sirolimus is a non-nephrotoxic cell-cycle progression antagonist that has proven to be highly effective in preventing renal allograft rejection when used in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. On the basis of its immunosuppressive potency alone, sirolimus has emerged as an agent with the potential for facilitating the elimination of calcineurin inhibitors or corticosteroids from the maintenance regimens administered to kidney transplant recipients. The results of three randomized trials suggest that use of sirolimus as a substitute for cyclosporine in patients receiving steroids and either azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil results in comparable rates of acute rejection and better renal function than in patients maintained on cyclosporine. Preliminary results from uncontrolled trials indicate that use of sirolimus in combination with either cyclosporine or tacrolimus allows withdrawal of steroid therapy with low rates of subsequent acute rejection compared to historical controls. Larger, controlled studies with longer durations of follow-up are warranted to verify the favorable results of these early experiences with the use of sirolimus as a calcineurin inhibitor or steroid-sparing agent.

Optimizing the long-term outcome of renal transplants: opportunities created by sirolimus

This review focuses upon the sirolimus-based cyclosporine elimination studies and the light they shed on choice of the best long-term immunosuppressive strategy for managing the balance between prevention of loss of grafts from antigen specific immune responses or from chronic nephrotoxicity. The underlying strategy of both cyclosporine elimination studies was to treat patients with a uniform therapy for the first 3 months and then wean off the cyclosporine therapy in one cohort. The Phase II study was conducted in 246 recipients in 17 centers in the USA and Europe. Thus 97 patients were treated with full-dose cyclosporine, fixed-dose sirolimus and corticosteroids, and 100 patients received reduced-dose cyclosporine and trough concentration controlled sirolimus with corticosteroids until 3 months when the dose of cyclosporine was tapered progressively. The phase III study was undertaken in 525 patients in 57 centers in Australia, Canada and Europe with randomization for cyclosporine elimination undertaken at 3 months and implemented over the next 4-6 weeks. The primary outcome of renal function was better in the elimination arms of both studies and, in the phase III study, continued to improve for up to 2 years. Both studies demonstrated better renal function, equivalent patient and graft survival and no difference in acute rejection rates. These studies have shown that one of the successful strategies for improving the longer term graft survival rates includes the continuous use of sirolimus and steroids, without calcineurin inhibitors.

Renal transplantation: can we reduce calcineurin inhibitor/stop steroids? Evidence based on protocol biopsy findings

How to combine antirejection drugs and which is the optimal dose of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors beyond the first year after kidney transplantation to maintain adequate immunosuppression without major side effects are far from clear. Kidney transplant patients on steroid, cyclosporine (CsA), and azathioprine were randomized to per-protocol biopsy (n = 30) or no-biopsy (n = 29) 1 to 2 yr posttransplant. Steroid or CsA were discontinued or reduced on the basis of biopsy to establish effects on drug-related complications, acute rejection, and graft function over 3 yr of follow-up. Serum creatinine, GFR (plasma clearance of iohexol), RPF (renal clearance of p-aminohippurate), CsA pharmacokinetics, and adverse events were monitored yearly. At the end, patients underwent a second biopsy. Per-protocol biopsy histology revealed no lesions (n = 5, steroid withdrawal), CsA nephropathy (n = 13, CsA discontinuation/reduction), or chronic rejection (n = 12, standard therapy). Reducing the drug regimen led to overall fewer side effects related to immunosuppression as compared with standard therapy or no-biopsy. Steroids were safely stopped with no acute rejection or graft loss. Complete CsA discontinuation was associated with acute rejection in the first four patients. Lowering CsA to low target CsA trough (30 to 70 ng/ml) never led to acute rejection or major renal function deterioration. Biopsy patients on conventional regimen had no acute rejection, one graft loss, no significant change in GFR, and significant RPF decline. No-biopsy controls: no acute rejection, one graft loss, significant decline of GFR and RPF. By serial biopsy analysis, severe lesions did not develop in patients with steroid discontinuation in contrast to patients on standard therapy over follow-up. CsA reduction did not adversely affect histology. Per-protocol biopsy more than 1 yr after kidney transplantation is a safe procedure to guide change of drug regimen and to lower the risk of major side effects.

Open randomized trial comparing early withdrawal of either cyclosporine or mycophenolate mofetil in stable renal transplant recipients initially treated with a triple drug regimen

Cyclosporine (CsA) is the current primary immunosuppressant for the prevention of renal allograft rejection. Its chronic use is associated with various adverse effects like hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and nephrotoxicity, which in turn may contribute to chronic allograft nephropathy and cardiovascular mortality. This study compares a CsA-free maintenance regimen of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids with CsA and corticosteroids after early conversion from triple drug therapy. Eighty-four renal transplant recipients who had stable graft function on triple drug therapy with MMF, CsA, and steroids were randomly assigned to be withdrawn from either CsA (n = 44) or MMF (n = 40) at 3 mo posttransplantation. Kidney function at 1 yr was the primary endpoint. Secondary parameters of efficacy were patient and graft survival, incidence of acute rejection episodes, BP, and lipids. At study entry, the alternative treatment groups were similar with respect to demographics, renal function, dosage of CsA, BP, and concomitant medication. Both the creatinine clearance (71.7 versus 60.9 ml/min) and calculated GFR (73.2 versus 61.9 ml/min) were significantly better in MMF-treated patients at 1 yr. Conversion to MMF was associated with a decline of systolic and diastolic BP (128/76 versus 139/82 mmHg) and with a more favorable lipid profile. There was no difference in patient survival (100%) and graft survival (97.7% versus 100%). Acute rejection episodes occurred more frequently after withdrawal of CsA (11.3% versus 5.0%), but the difference was NS. Early tapering of CsA can safely be accomplished in renal transplant recipients who are stable on a triple drug regimen with MMF, thereby resulting in improved renal function, a more favorable lipid profile, and beneficial effects on posttransplant hypertension.

Reducing adverse effects of immunosuppressive agents in kidney transplant recipients

Success in solid organ transplantation with minimal complications can now be achieved for most patients, and a remarkable rate of graft and patient survival can also be expected. However, the potential for adverse events and comorbid conditions increases with longer graft survival. Although the immunosuppressive regimen is central to the outcome of the transplant recipient and directly impacts the survival of the graft, chronic use of immunosuppressive agents is associated with metabolic disturbances such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, loss of bone density, nephrotoxicity, and diabetes, which may contribute to other comorbid conditions. In addition, changes in appearance, gingival hyperplasia, hirsutism, alopecia, and weight gain disrupt quality of life and may lead to noncompliance with the immunosuppressive regimen. New immunosuppressive medications, including mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus, basiliximab, and daclizumab, have allowed for experimentation with new regimens designed to reduce or allow discontinuation of corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors. This review highlights the impact and cost of immunosuppressive side effects and the potential for new immunosuppressive regimens to reduce this substantial clinical burden in transplantation.

Outcome of cadaveric renal transplant patients treated for 10 years with cyclosporine: is chronic allograft nephropathy the major cause of late graft loss?

BACKGROUND

The introduction of cyclosporine (CsA) has improved the short-term outcome of renal transplantation, but its effect on the long-term survival is not well known.

METHODS

We analyzed 128 cadaveric first renal transplant recipients with CsA and prednisone as basal immunosuppression followed for at least 10 years, and we have compared them with a group of 185 historical patients treated with azathioprine (Aza) and prednisone.

RESULTS

The 1-year graft survival was 83% in the CsA-treated patients and 68% in the Aza-treated patients (P<0.025), and the differences were significant for 3 years. Acute rejection accounted for the 10.9% of losses in CsA-treated patients and for 23.8% of losses in Aza-treated patients (P=0.046). Chronic allograft nephropathy was the cause of graft losses in 40.6% and 16.8% of cases (P=0.008). Patient survival at 5 years was 88% in CsA-treated patients and 79% in the Aza-treated patients (P<0.025). When analyzing the data of the 64 CsA-treated patients and the 84 Aza-treated patients with one functioning graft at 10 years, mean serum creatinine values were significantly higher in the CsA-treated patients at all time points but the increases were not significantly different. At 10 years, mean blood pressure was higher (P=0.002), and hypercholesterolemia (P=0.011) and hyperuricemia (P=0.000) were more prevalent in the CsA-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CsA resulted in a better short-time patient and graft survival that was not maintained in the long-term outcome. Chronic allograft nephropathy was the leading cause of graft loss in CsA-treated patients. Graft function was poorer in the CsA-treated patients, but its decline was similar in the two groups.

Impact of cyclosporine withdrawal on living related renal transplants: a single-center experience

High treatment costs force the discontinuation of cyclosporine (CSA) in a vast majority of renal transplant recipients in India. The impact of CSA withdrawal among 108 living related renal transplant recipients 12.54 +/- 4.2 months after transplantation was studied retrospectively. In 83 patients, CSA was withdrawn over a 12-week period (group I). Azathioprine dosage was increased to 2 to 2.5 mg/kg/d, and prednisolone, to 30 mg/d 2 weeks and 1 week before starting CSA withdrawal, respectively. In the other 25 patients, CSA had to be withdrawn faster (mean, 28.52 +/- 14.18 days; group II). Twenty-nine rejection episodes (26.9%) were noted in 22 patients (20.4%; 19% in group I and 52% in group II; P: = 0.008). Fifteen group-I patients (18%) and 11 group-II patients (44%) died or lost their grafts (P: = 0.017). There was no difference in age, donor source, HLA matches, pretransplantation cross-match positivity, delayed graft function, immunosuppressive drug doses, rejection episodes, or prewithdrawal serum creatinine levels between the patients who did or did not develop acute rejection after CSA withdrawal. On follow-up, 10 patients (50%) died or returned to dialysis among the rejection group compared with 16 patients (18%) in the nonrejection group (P: = 0.007). The mean creatinine level at last follow-up was greater in the rejection group (3.97 +/- 2.54 versus 1.65 +/- 1.1 mg/dL; P: < 0.001). CSA withdrawal because of economic constraints carries a significant risk for acute rejection and death and/or graft loss in Indian living donor renal transplant recipients, even after 12 months.

Conversion to rapamycin immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients: report of an initial experience

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of RAPA conversion in patients undergoing cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (Tac) toxicity.

METHODS

Twenty renal transplant recipients were switched to fixed dose rapamycin (RAPA) (5 mg/day) 0 to 204 months posttransplant. Drug monitoring was not initially used to adjust doses. The indications for switch were chronic CsA or Tac nephrotoxicity (12), acute CsA or Tac toxicity (3), severe facial dysmorphism (2), posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in remission (2), and hepatotoxicity in 1. Follow-up is 7 to 24 months.

RESULTS

In the 12 patients switched because of chronic nephrotoxicity there was a significant decrease in serum creatinine [233+/-34 to 210+/-56 micromol/liter (P<0.05) at 6 months]. Facial dysmorphism improved in two patients. No relapse of PTLD was observed. Five patients developed pneumonia (two Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, one infectious mononucleosis with polyclonal PTLD lung infiltrate) and two had bronchiolitis obliterans. There were no deaths. RAPA was discontinued in four patients, because of pneumonia in two, PTLD in one, and oral aphtous ulcers in one. RAPA levels were high (>15 ng/ml) in 7 of 13 (54%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

RAPA conversion provides adequate immunosuppression to enable CsA withdrawal. However, when converting patients to RAPA drug levels should be monitored to avoid over-immunosuppression and adequate antiviral and Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia prophylaxis should be given.

A meta-analysis of immunosuppression withdrawal trials in renal transplantation

Since the publication of previous meta-analyses of cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone withdrawal in renal transplant recipients, several additional randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up have been reported. Currently, in nine prednisone withdrawal trials (n = 1461), the proportion of patients with acute rejection was increased by 0.14 (95% confidence interval = 0.10 to 0. 17, P < 0.001). In nine prednisone withdrawal trials (n = 1899), the relative risk (RR; RR = 1.0 indicates no risk) of graft failure after withdrawal was also increased (RR = 1.40; range, 1.09 to 1.70, P = 0.012). There was no evidence of between-study heterogeneity for either acute rejection or graft failure in the prednisone withdrawal trials by a chi(2) test (P > 0.05). In 10 CsA withdrawal trials (n = 1049), the proportion of patients with acute rejection was increased by 0.11 (0.07 to 0.15, P < 0.001). In 12 trials (n = 1151), the RR of graft failure after CsA withdrawal was 1.06 (95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.29, P = 0.646), but a chi(2) test indicated that there was study heterogeneity. However, there was no evidence of heterogeneity in the six studies (n = 632) with at least 4.0 yr (5.8 +/- 1.7) of follow-up (RR = 0.92; range, 0.64 to 1.20, P = 0.569) or in the seven trials (n = 962) published in peer-reviewed journals (RR = 0.95; range, 0.70 to 1.20 P = 0.682). Finally, in three trials (n = 259) that compared CsA and prednisone withdrawal, there was a nonsignificant trend for less graft failure with CsA withdrawal (RR = 0.63; range, 0.08 to 1.16, P = 0.190). Thus, unlike prednisone withdrawal, CsA withdrawal in select patients seems to impart little risk of long-term graft failure.

Excellent long-term graft survival in low risk, primary renal allografts treated with prednisolone-avoidance immunosuppression

Primary avoidance of oral corticosteroids for renal transplant recipients is uncommon. The South Australian renal transplant service used a double therapy (DT) regimen of cyclosporin and azathioprine from August 1986 to July 1996 for low risk (first graft, PRA < 50%) allografts. Oral corticosteroid, prednisolone (P), was reserved for severe rejection or two mild rejection episodes, but could be later withdrawn at the physician's discretion. This regimen is associated with more early acute rejection (Russ et al., Clin Transplant 1990: 4: 26). We have now analysed long-term patient survival (PS) and graft survival (GS) for this group. Of 448 transplants in South Australia between August 1986 and July 1996, 295 commenced DT regimen. Ninety-four (31.8%) never received P at any stage post-transplantation (group 1), 96 (32.5%) were placed on P and later weaned (group 2), and 97 (33%) remained on long-term P (group 3). Technical losses, eight (2.7%), within 30 d of transplantation, were excluded from sub-group analysis. PS for the total DT cohort at 1, 5 and 9 yr post-transplantation was 97, 88 and 74%, respectively. GS over the same time period was 88, 75 and 55%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in survival compared to other 'low risk' grafts in the rest of Australia during the same time period. Mean serum creatinine concentration (CrC) for the DT group at 3 and 6 months and 1, 3, 5 and 10 yr was not significantly different to the rest of the Australian 'low risk' grafts. In the DT cohort, there were 334 acute rejections ( < 90 d) in 206 patients (70%), but only 42 (12.5%) required anti-lymphocyte antibody therapy (OKT3 or ATG) for rejection. PS at 9 yr was not statistically significantly different between groups 1 and 2, but both groups survived better than group 3 (p < 0.0043). GS for group 1 at 1, 5 and 9 yr post-transplantation was 90, 81 and 73%, respectively; for group 2, 98, 87 and 66%, respectively; and for group 3, 84, 63 and 29%, respectively. Statistical significance was reached in group 1 versus 3 (p < 0.001) and group 2 versus 3 (p < 0.001). In summary, a DT regimen in low risk, first renal allografts gives excellent long-term patient and GS and minimises long-term P, despite a high rate of early acute rejection.

Chronic allograft nephropathy: An update

Chronic allograft nephropathy is the most prevalent cause of renal transplant failure in the first post-transplant decade, but its pathogenesis has remained elusive. Clinically, it is characterized by a slow but variable loss of function, often in combination with proteinuria and hypertension. The histopathology is also not specific, but transplant glomerulopathy and multilayering of the peritubular capillaries are highly characteristic. Several risk factors have been identified, such as advanced donor age, delayed graft function, repeated acute rejection episodes, vascular rejection episodes, and rejections that occur late after transplantation. A common feature of chronic allograft nephropathy is that it develops in grafts that have undergone previous damage, although the mechanism(s) responsible for the progressive fibrosis and tissue remodeling has not yet been defined. Hypotheses to explain chronic allograft nephropathy include the immunolymphatic theory, the cytokine excess theory, the loss of supporting architecture theory, and the premature senescence theory. The most effective option to prevent chronic allograft nephropathy is to avoid graft injury from both immune and nonimmune mechanisms.

Issues in cyclosporine drug substitution: implications for patient management

Substantial improvements in short-term and long-term outcomes for kidney transplant recipients have resulted from better use of existing immunosuppressive agents and newer treatment options. Calcineurin inhibitors (e.g., cyclosporine and tacrolimus) remain the foundation of immunosuppressive therapy. These agents are considered critical-dose drugs because of their narrow therapeutic range, variable pharmacokinetics, formulation-dependent bioavailability, and negative clinical consequences of underdosing or overdosing. With the recent introduction of a new cyclosporine formulation, concern exists that current bioequivalence guidelines for generic approval may not provide adequate assessment of the safety and efficacy of critical-dose drugs. Transplant experts at 2 recent conferences recommended more rigorous criteria for bioequivalence testing of critical-dose drugs and adoption of consistent drug substitution practices. Additional recommendations included specifying the intended formulation and instituting appropriate monitoring whenever formulations are switched. A summary of the outcomes of these conferences and practice implications for transplant coordinators is discussed.

Low-dose cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients with suboptimal renal function

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity can be identified by functional changes and chronic renal damage. CsA-associated renal fibrosis has been related to the overproduction of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1, a fibrogenic cytokine. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may allow CsA dose reduction without increasing the risk of rejection.

METHODS

We studied the impact of CsA dose reduction in association with MMF on renal function and TGF-beta1, production in 16 long-term renal allograft recipients with suspected CsA nephrotoxicity. Two grams/day of MMF were introduced, and CsA dose was reduced to reach whole-blood levels between 40 and 60 ng/ml within 1 month. CsA dose and levels, renal function parameters, and platelet-poor plasma TGF-beta1 levels were evaluated before and 6 months thereafter.

RESULTS

MMF allowed a decrease in both the mean dose of CsA (3.8+/-1.35 vs. 2.2+/-0.73 mg/kg/day; P<0.01) and CsA levels (148+/-36 vs. 53+/-19 ng/ml; P<0.001). The reduction of CsA was associated with a decrement of serum creatinine levels (210+/-46 vs. 172+/-41 micromol/L; P<0.001) and an increase in both the glomerular filtration rate (32.9+/-12 vs. 39.1+/-14 ml/min/1.73 m2; P<0.02) and renal plasma flow (195+/-79 to 218.6+/-74.02 ml/min/1.73 m2; P<0.02). There was a reduction in plasma TGF-beta1 levels (4.6+/-4.2 vs. 2.0+/-1.4 ng/ml; P=0.003) and CsA levels correlated with TGF-beta1 (r=0.536, P=0.002). No rejection episodes occurred, and an improvement in both systolic (149+/-13 vs. 137+/-12 mmHg; P<0.01) and diastolic blood pressure (89+/-14 vs. 83+/-10 mmHg; P<0.04) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

These short-term results show that MMF introduction allows a CsA dose reduction, which improves renal function, reduces TGF-beta1 production, and improves the control of hypertension, without increasing the incidence of acute rejection.

Long-term outcome of a prospective randomized trial of conversion from cyclosporine to azathioprine treatment one year after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Since the introduction of cyclosporine (CsA), 1-year renal allograft survival has improved, but concern persists about the long-term adverse effects of CsA, especially with respect to renal function and blood pressure. This randomized controlled trial was set up to establish whether withdrawal of CsA would alter long-term outcome.

METHODS

Adult patients who, at 1 year after renal transplantation, had a stable serum creatinine of less than 300 micromol/L and who had not had acute rejection within the last 6 months were eligible for entry. Patients were randomized either to continue on CsA (n=114) or to stop CsA and start azathioprine (Aza, n=102). All patients remained on prednisolone. Median follow-up was 93 months after transplantation (range: 52-133 months).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in actuarial 10-year patient or graft survival (Kaplan-Meier), despite an increased incidence of acute rejection within the first few months after conversion. Median serum creatinine was lower in the Aza group (Aza: 119 micromol/L; CsA. 153 micromol/L at 5 years after randomization, P=0.0002). The requirement for antihypertensive treatment was also reduced after conversion to Aza; 75% of patients required antihypertensive treatment at the start of the study, decreasing to 55% from 1 year after randomization in the Aza group and increasing to >80% in the CsA group (55% (Aza) and 84% (CsA) at 5 years after randomization, P<0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from CsA to Aza at 1 year after renal transplantation results in improvement in both blood pressure control and renal allograft function, and is not associated with significant adverse effects on long-term patient or graft survival.

Withdrawal of immunosuppression: implications for composite tissue allograft transplantation

Complete or partial withdrawal of immunosuppression is a desirable goal for physicians managing solid organ transplant recipients and has particular appeal for the management of composite tissue allograft recipients. Experience to date with steroid withdrawal or cyclosporine withdrawal in organ transplant recipients suggests that the risks of acute rejection are minimized with slow tapering of the drugs and when drug withdrawal is attempted many months or years after transplantation. Unfortunately, the full benefits of withdrawing any component of a multidrug immunosuppression regimen can probably be achieved only when the drug is withdrawn relatively early after transplantation. Thus, there is a need for improved immunologic monitoring to facilitate withdrawal of immunosuppression in any setting. Because steroid withdrawal might be particularly advantageous to the recipient of a composite tissue allograft, further experience is needed to determine the safety of steroid withdrawal with newer immunosuppressants such as tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and sirolimus.

Long-term improvement in renal function after cyclosporine reduction in renal transplant recipients with histologically proven chronic cyclosporine nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Chronic cyclosporine (CsA) nephropathy, which has been unequivocally documented in recipients of heart, heart-lung, liver, or bone marrow transplants, as well as in nontransplant situations, usually results in a progressive deterioration of renal function. In this study, we assessed the potential reversibility of chronic CsA nephropathy in renal transplant recipients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-three renal transplant patients with biopsy-proven CsA nephropathy associated with long-term CsA administration (27+/-4 months) were followed up for more than 2 years after CsA reduction (18/23 patients) or withdrawal (5/23 patients) and addition of azathioprine. Changes in effective renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate were assessed before and 2 years after CsA reduction, whereas serum creatinine, proteinuria, blood pressure, and CsA concentrations were monitored up to 5 years.

RESULTS

At 2-year follow-up, glomerular filtration rate increased from 40+/-3 to 47+/-4 (P<0.05) and effective renal plasma flow from 217+/-23 to 244+/-24 ml/min/1.73 m2 (NS). Mean arterial pressure significantly decreased from 98.7+/-2.9 to 93.1+/-2.7 mmHg (P<0.05). There was no significant change in renal vascular resistance, filtration fraction, or albumin excretion. A significant decrease in serum creatinine was also observed during the whole follow-up (73+/-6.5 months). CsA reduction was followed by only one episode of acute reversible rejection; chronic rejection developed in three patients 2 years or later after CsA reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that CsA nephropathy participates in graft dysfunction in a small group of renal transplant recipients. In addition, graft dysfunction may be reversible when CsA dosage is reduced early after diagnosis of chronic CsA nephropathy.

Effect of long-term immunosuppression in kidney-graft recipients on cancer incidence: randomised comparison of two cyclosporin regimens

BACKGROUND

Long-term administration of cyclosporin carries a risk of renal toxicity, and immunosuppressants are associated with an increased rate of malignant disorders. We undertook an open randomised study of the risks and benefits of two long-term maintenance regimens of cyclosporin in kidney-allograft recipients. The primary endpoint was graft function; secondary endpoints were survival and occurrence of cancer and rejection.

METHODS

231 recipients of a first allograft with at most one previous rejection episode were randomised 1 year after transplantation. Most were receiving cyclosporin and azathioprine. One group received cyclosporin doses adjusted to yield trough blood concentrations of 75-125 ng/mL (low-dose group); the second received doses that yielded trough concentrations of 150-250 ng/mL (normal-dose group). Analysis was by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

At 66 months' follow-up, the low-dose and normal-dose groups were similar in mean serum creatinine (182 [SD 160] vs 184 [157] micromol/L; p=0.9) and mean creatinine clearance (47.5 [25.1] vs 45.3 (22.5] mL/min; p=0.6). Nine of 116 patients in the low-dose group and one of 115 in the normal-dose group had symptoms of rejection (p<0.02). There was no difference between the low-dose and normal-dose groups in survival (95 vs 92%; p=0.7) or graft survival (89 vs 82%; p=0.17) at 6 years. 60 patients developed cancers, 37 in the normal-dose group and 23 in the low-dose group (p<0.034); 66% were skin cancers (26 vs 17; p<0.05).

INTERPRETATION

We found no evidence that halving of trough blood cyclosporin concentrations significantly changes graft function or graft survival. The low-dose regimen was associated with fewer malignant disorders but more frequent rejection. The design of long-term maintenance protocols for transplant recipients based on powerful immunosuppressant combinations should take these potential risks into account.