1
|
Kuwatsuru Y, Saito AI, Usui K. Radiation Oncologists' Views on Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer in the Elderly: Comparisons between Japan and the United States. Cancer Invest 2024; 42:309-318. [PMID: 38666473 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2024.2343860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To understand perspective on breast cancer using a survey. MATERIALS & METHODS Questionnaire was distributed to 304 Japanese radiation oncologists (RadOncs) (response rate: 64.1%). Result was compared with a similar US survey. RESULTS In a scenario with an 81-year-old patient with comorbidities, while most US RadOncs chose to tell that radiation might not be necessary, 2% of Japanese chose it. In a scenario with a healthy 65-year-old breast cancer patient with lumpectomy, while most US RadOncs chose to discuss omission of radiation, 24.5% of Japanese chose it. CONCLUSIONS Differences were observed on radiotherapy for older early-stage breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiki Kuwatsuru
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Anneyuko I Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Usui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiological Technology, Juntendo University Faculty of Health Science
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chicheł A, Burchardt WM, Kluska A, Chyrek AJ. Thermally boosted interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy in high-risk early-stage breast cancer conserving therapy - large cohort long-term results. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2023; 28:661-670. [PMID: 38179295 PMCID: PMC10764043 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.97510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Early-stage high-risk breast cancer (BC) is standardly treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT), combined with systemic therapy and radiotherapy (RT) ± tumor bed boost, e.g., with interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). To improve local recurrence rate (LRR), BT radiosensitization (thermal boost, TB) with interstitial microwave hyperthermia (MWHT) may be an option. The paper aims to report a retrospective single-institutional study on 5- and 10-year local control (LC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), cosmetic outcome (CO), and late toxicity (fibrosis, fat necrosis) after thermally enhanced HDR-BT boost to the BC tumor bed. Materials and methods In 2006-2018, 557 early-stage (I-IIIA) high-risk BC patients were treated with BCT. If indicated, they were administered systemic therapy, then referred for 40.0-50.0 Gy whole breast irradiation (WBI) and 10 Gy interstitial HDR-BT boost (group A). Eligible patients had a single MWHT session preceding BT (group B). Based on present risk factors (RF), medium-risk (1-2 RF) and high-risk subgroups (≥ 3 RF) were formed. Patients were standardly checked, and control mammography (MMG) was performed yearly. Breast cosmesis (Harvard scale) and fibrosis were recorded. LC, DMFS, DFS, and OS were statistically analyzed. Results Out of 557 patients aged 57 years (26-84), 364 (63.4%) had interstitial HDR-BT boost (group A), and 193 (34.6%) were preheated with MWHT (group B). Patients in group B had a higher clinical stage and had more RFs. The median follow-up was 65.9. Estimated 5-year and 10-year LC resulted in 98.5% and 97.5%, respectively. There was no difference in LC, DMFS, DFS, and OS between groups A and B and between extracted high-risk subgroups A and B. Five- and ten-year OS probability was 95.4% and 88.0%, respectively, with no difference between groups A and B. Harvard criteria-based CO assessment revealed good/excellent cosmesis in 74.9-79.1%. Tumor bed hardening was present in 40.1-42.2%. Asymptomatic fat necrosis-related macrocalcifications were detected in 15.6%, more frequently in group B (p = 0.016). Conclusions Thermally boosted or not, HDR-BT was locally highly effective as part of combined treatment. Five- and ten-year LC, DMFS, DFS, and OS were high and equally distributed between the groups, although TB was prescribed in more advanced one with more RFs. TB did not influence CO and fibrosis. TB added to late toxicity regarding asymptomatic fat necrosis detected on MMG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Chicheł
- Brachytherapy Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Wojciech Maria Burchardt
- Brachytherapy Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
- Electroradiology Department, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - Adam Kluska
- Brachytherapy Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Artur Jan Chyrek
- Brachytherapy Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
- Electroradiology Department, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jaysing A, Lischalk JW, Sanchez A, Mendez C, May P, Solan A, Witten M, Logman Z, Haas JA. Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Adjuvant Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Outcomes of a Large Single-Institution Study. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 8:101095. [PMID: 36845620 PMCID: PMC9943783 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Advancements in breast radiation therapy offer innumerable benefits to patients and the health care system. Despite promising outcomes, clinicians remain hesitant about long-term side effects and disease control with accelerated partial breast radiation therapy (APBI). Herein, we review the long-term outcomes of patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with adjuvant stereotactic partial breast irradiation (SAPBI). Methods and Materials This retrospective study examined outcomes of patients who received diagnoses of early-stage breast cancer treated with adjuvant robotic SAPBI. All patients were eligible for standard ABPI and underwent lumpectomy, followed by fiducial placement in preparation for SAPBI. Using fiducial and respiratory tracking to maintain a precise dose distribution throughout the course of treatment, patients received 30 Gy in 5 fractions on consecutive days. Follow-up occurred at routine intervals to evaluate disease control, toxicity, and cosmesis. Toxicity and cosmesis were characterized using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 and Harvard Cosmesis Scale, respectively. Results Patients (N = 50) were a median age of 68.5 years at the time of treatment. The median tumor size was 7.2 mm, 60% had an invasive cell type, and 90% were estrogen receptor positive, progesterone receptor positive, or both. Patients (n = 49) were followed for a median of 4.68 years for disease control and 1.25 years for cosmesis and toxicity. One patient experienced local recurrence, 1 patient experienced grade 3+ late toxicity, and 44 patients demonstrated excellent cosmesis. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the largest retrospective analysis with the longest follow-up time for disease control among patients with early breast cancer treated with robotic SAPBI. With follow-up time for cosmesis and toxicity comparable to that of previous studies, results of the present cohort advance our understanding of the excellent disease control, excellent cosmesis, and limited toxicity that can be achieved by treating select patients with early-stage breast cancer with robotic SAPBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Jaysing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Long Island School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan W. Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital – Long Island, Mineola, New York
- Corresponding author: Jonathan W. Lischalk, MD
| | - Astrid Sanchez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital – Long Island, Mineola, New York
| | - Christopher Mendez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital – Long Island, Mineola, New York
| | - Phoebe May
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital – Long Island, Mineola, New York
| | - Amy Solan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital – Long Island, Mineola, New York
| | - Matthew Witten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital – Long Island, Mineola, New York
| | - Zhanna Logman
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Hospital – Long Island, Mineola, New York
| | - Jonathan A. Haas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital – Long Island, Mineola, New York
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grosman S, Scott IA. Quality of observational studies of clinical interventions: a meta-epidemiological review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22:313. [PMID: 36476329 PMCID: PMC9727931 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01797-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This meta-epidemiological study aimed to assess methodological quality of a sample of contemporary non-randomised clinical studies of clinical interventions. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study of observational studies published between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2018. Studies were identified in PubMed using search terms 'association', 'observational,' 'non-randomised' 'comparative effectiveness' within titles or abstracts. Each study was appraised against 35 quality criteria by two authors independently, with each criterion rated fully, partially or not satisfied. These quality criteria were grouped into 6 categories: justification for observational design (n = 2); minimisation of bias in study design and data collection (n = 11); use of appropriate methods to create comparable groups (n = 6); appropriate adjustment of observed effects (n = 5); validation of observed effects (n = 9); and authors interpretations (n = 2). RESULTS Of 50 unique studies, 49 (98%) were published in two US general medical journals. No study fully satisfied all applicable criteria; the mean (+/-SD) proportion of applicable criteria fully satisfied across all studies was 72% (+/- 10%). The categories of quality criteria demonstrating the lowest proportions of fully satisfied criteria were measures used to adjust observed effects (criteria 20, 23, 24) and validate observed effects (criteria 25, 27, 33). Criteria associated with ≤50% of full satisfaction across studies, where applicable, comprised: imputation methods to account for missing data (50%); justification for not performing an RCT (42%); interaction analyses in identifying independent prognostic factors potentially influencing intervention effects (42%); use of statistical correction to minimise type 1 error in multiple outcome analyses (33%); clinically significant effect sizes (30%); residual bias analyses for unmeasured or unknown confounders (14%); and falsification tests for residual confounding (8%). The proportions of fully satisfied criteria did not change over time. CONCLUSIONS Recently published observational studies fail to fully satisfy more than one in four quality criteria. Criteria that were not or only partially satisfied were identified which serve as remediable targets for researchers and journal editors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergei Grosman
- grid.412744.00000 0004 0380 2017Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Brisbane, Queensland 4102 Australia ,grid.413210.50000 0004 4669 2727Department of Medicine, Cairns Hospital, 165 The Esplanade, Cairns, Queensland 4870 Australia
| | - Ian A. Scott
- grid.412744.00000 0004 0380 2017Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Brisbane, Queensland 4102 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The History of Early Breast Cancer Treatment. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13060960. [PMID: 35741721 PMCID: PMC9222657 DOI: 10.3390/genes13060960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
“The story of cancer is the story of human ingenuity, resilience, and perseverance, but also of hubris, paternalism, and misperception” (Siddhartha Mukherjee). The present review discusses the evolution of early breast cancer (BC) treatment philosophy in the last 50 years and the shift from an emphasis on local therapy to an emphasis on systemic precision treatment options.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bioactive cationic peptides as potential agents for breast cancer treatment. Biosci Rep 2021; 41:230394. [PMID: 34874400 PMCID: PMC8655503 DOI: 10.1042/bsr20211218c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer continues to affect millions of women worldwide, and the number of new cases dramatically increases every year. The physiological causes behind the disease are still not fully understood. One in every 100 cases can occur in men, and although the frequency is lower than among women, men tend to have a worse prognosis of the disease. Various therapeutic alternatives to combat the disease are available. These depend on the type and progress of the disease, and include chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, and cancer immunotherapy. However, there are several well-reported side effects of these treatments that have a significant impact on life quality, and patients either relapse or are refractory to treatment. This makes it necessary to develop new therapeutic strategies. One promising initiative are bioactive peptides, which have emerged in recent years as a family of compounds with an enormous number of clinical applications due to their broad spectrum of activity. They are widely distributed in several organisms as part of their immune system. The antitumoral activity of these peptides lies in a nonspecific mechanism of action associated with their interaction with cancer cell membranes, inducing, through several routes, bilayer destabilization and cell death. This review provides an overview of the literature on the evaluation of cationic peptides as potential agents against breast cancer under different study phases. First, physicochemical characteristics such as the primary structure and charge are presented. Secondly, information about dosage, the experimental model used, and the mechanism of action proposed for the peptides are discussed.
Collapse
|
7
|
Intratumoral administration of astatine-211-labeled gold nanoparticle for alpha therapy. J Nanobiotechnology 2021; 19:223. [PMID: 34320997 PMCID: PMC8317303 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-021-00963-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background 211At is a high-energy α-ray emitter with a relatively short half-life and a high cytotoxicity for cancer cells. Its dispersion can be imaged using clinical scanners, and it can be produced in cyclotrons without the use of nuclear fuel material. This study investigated the biodistribution and the antitumor effect of 211At-labeled gold nanoparticles (211At-AuNP) administered intratumorally. Results AuNP with a diameter of 5, 13, 30, or 120 nm that had been modified with poly (ethylene glycol) methyl ether (mPEG) thiol and labeled with 211At (211At-AuNP-S-mPEG) were incubated with tumor cells, or intratumorally administered to C6 glioma or PANC-1 pancreatic cancers subcutaneously transplanted into rodent models. Systemic and intratumoral distributions of the particles in the rodents were then evaluated using scintigraphy and autoradiography, and the changes in tumor volumes were followed for about 40 days. 211At-AuNP-S-mPEG was cytotoxic when it was internalized by the tumor cells. After intratumoral administration, 211At-AuNP-S-mPEG became localized in the tumor and did not spread to systemic organs during a time period equivalent to 6 half-lives of 211At. Tumor growth was strongly suppressed for both C6 and PANC-1 by 211At-AuNP-S-mPEG. In the C6 glioma model, the strongest antitumor effect was observed in the group treated with 211At-AuNP-S-mPEG with a diameter of 5 nm. Conclusions The intratumoral single administration of a simple nanoparticle, 211At-AuNP-S-mPEG, was shown to suppress the growth of tumor tissue strongly in a particle size-dependent manner without radiation exposure to other organs caused by systemic spread of the radionuclide. Graphic Abstract ![]()
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12951-021-00963-9.
Collapse
|
8
|
Eldredge-Hindy H, Pan J, Rai SN, Reshko LB, Dragun A, Riley EC, McMasters KM, Ajkay N. A Phase II Trial of Once Weekly Hypofractionated Breast Irradiation for Early Stage Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:5880-5892. [PMID: 33738712 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09777-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report an interim analysis of a phase II trial of once weekly, hypofractionated breast irradiation (WH-WBI) following breast conserving surgery (BCS). METHODS Patients had stage 0-II breast cancer treated with breast BCS with negative margins. WH-WBI was 28.5 or 30Gy delivered to the whole breast using tangential beams with no elective coverage of lymph nodes. The primary endpoint was ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). Secondary endpoints were distant disease-free survival (DDFS), recurrence free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events and cosmesis. RESULTS From 2011 to 2015, 158 patients received WH-WBI. Median follow up was 4.4 years (range 0.2-8.1). Stage distribution was DCIS 22%; invasive pN0 68%; invasive pN1 10%. 80 patients received 30 Gy and 78 received 28.5 Gy with median follow up times of 5.6 and 3.7 years, respectively. There were 5 IBTR events, all in the 30 Gy group. The 5- and 7- year risks of IBRT for all patients were 2.2% (95% CI 0.6-5.8) and 6.0% (95% CI 1.1-17.2), respectively. The 7-year rates of DDFS, RFS, and OS were 96.3%, 91.5% and 89.8%, respectively. Improvement in IBTR-free time was seen in DCIS, lobular histology, low grade tumors, Her2 negative tumors and 28.5 Gy dose (all p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Disease-specific outcomes after WH-WBI are favorable and parallel those seen with conventional radiation techniques for stage 0-II breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet Eldredge-Hindy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.
| | - Jianmin Pan
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Shesh N Rai
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.,Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Leonid B Reshko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Anthony Dragun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Riley
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Kelly M McMasters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Nicolas Ajkay
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Longacre CF, Neprash HT, Shippee ND, Tuttle TM, Virnig BA. Travel, Treatment Choice, and Survival Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Analysis. WOMEN'S HEALTH REPORTS (NEW ROCHELLE, N.Y.) 2021; 2:1-10. [PMID: 33786524 PMCID: PMC7957915 DOI: 10.1089/whr.2020.0094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Background: Travel distance to care facilities may shape urban-rural cancer survival disparities by creating barriers to specific treatments. Guideline-supported treatment options for women with early stage breast cancer involves considerations of breast conservation and travel burden: Mastectomy requires travel for surgery, whereas breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) requires travel for both surgery and RT. This provides a unique opportunity to evaluate the impact of travel distance on surgical decisions and receipt of guideline-concordant treatment. Materials and Methods: We included 61,169 women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer between 2004 and 2013 from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Driving distances to the nearest radiation facility were calculated by using Google Maps. We used multivariable regression to model treatment choice as a function of distance to radiation and Cox regression to model survival. Results: Women living farthest from radiation facilities (>50 miles vs. <10 miles) were more likely to undergo mastectomy versus BCS (odds ratio [OR]: 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-1.79). Among only those who underwent BCS, women living farther from radiation facilities were less likely to receive guideline-concordant RT (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.32-2.23). These guideline-discordant women had worse overall (hazards ratio [HR]: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.42-1.57) and breast-cancer specific survival (HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.29-1.60). Conclusions: We report two breast cancer treatments with different clinical and travel implications to show the association between travel distance, treatment decisions, and receipt of guideline-concordant treatment. Differential access to guideline-concordant treatment resulting from excess travel burden among rural patients may contribute to rural-urban survival disparities among cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen F. Longacre
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Hannah T. Neprash
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nathan D. Shippee
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Todd M. Tuttle
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Beth A. Virnig
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Strnad V, Yashar C. Breast brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2020; 20:976-983. [PMID: 33353845 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Accelerated partial breast irradiation with brachytherapy is a treatment method with a very low risk profile. In fact, accelerated partial breast irradiation brachytherapy has been proven in randomized trials to have fewer late side effects than whole-breast irradiation. Notably, Grade 3 late side effects are extremely rare, and excellent to good cosmetic results are observed in well over 90% of patients. In this article, published side effects of breast brachytherapy are reviewed and appropriate management discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vratislav Strnad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Catheryn Yashar
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Joo JH, Ki Y, Jeon H, Kim DW, Jung J, Kim SS. Who are the optimal candidates for partial breast irradiation? Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2020; 17:305-311. [PMID: 33078898 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
At the 2017 St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy for Early Breast Cancer, the consensus panel recognized "partial breast irradiation as an option for women meeting the low-risk criteria put forward by the American Society for Radiation Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ASTRO/ESTRO) guideline," although acknowledging that there was less evidence for this approach. Partial breast irradiation is defined as irradiation localized to the surgical resection cavity only as opposed to the entire breast. Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) involves intensive treatment in a short time period. The methods vary, and three available APBI options are brachytherapy, external beam and intra-operative irradiation. The long-term follow-up results from two large-scale, well-designed phase III randomized clinical trials have been released. However, further discussion of the optimal treatment candidates and delivery method is needed before the clinical application of APBI as a mainstream breast conservation treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Hyeon Joo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South Korea
| | - Yongkan Ki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, South Korea
| | - Hosang Jeon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South Korea
| | - Dong Woon Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South Korea
| | - Jinhong Jung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Su Ssan Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pasalic D, Strom EA, Allen PK, Williamson TD, Poenisch F, Amos RA, Woodward WA, Stauder MC, Shaitelman SF, Smith BD, Perkins GH, Tereffe W, Hoffman KE. Proton Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: Clinical Outcomes at a Planned Interim Analysis of a Prospective Phase 2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:441-448. [PMID: 32946965 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To perform a planned interim analysis of acute (within 12 months) and late (after 12 months) toxicities and cosmetic outcomes after proton accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 100 patients with pTis or pT1-2 N0 (≤3cm) breast cancer status after segmental mastectomy were enrolled in a single-arm phase 2 study from 2010 to 2019. The clinically determined postlumpectomy target volume, including tumor bed surgical clips and operative-cavity soft-tissue changes seen on imaging plus a radial clinical expansion, was irradiated with passively scattered proton APBI (34 Gy in 10 fractions delivered twice daily with a minimum 6-hour interfraction interval). Patients were evaluated at protocol-specific time intervals for recurrence, physician reports of cosmetic outcomes and toxicities, and patient reports of cosmetic outcomes and satisfaction with the treatment or experience. RESULTS Median follow-up was 24 months (interquartile range [IQR], 12-43 months). Local control and overall survival were 100% at 12 and 24 months. There were no acute or late toxicities of grade 3 or higher; no patients experienced fat necrosis, fibrosis, infection, or breast shrinkage. Excellent or good cosmesis at 12 months was reported by 91% of patients and 94% of physicians; at the most recent follow-up, these were 94% and 87%, respectively. The most commonly reported late cosmetic effect was telangiectasis (17%). The total patient satisfaction rate for treatment and results at 12 and 24 months was 96% and 100%, respectively. Patients' mean time away from work was 5 days (IQR, 2-5 days), and the median out-of-pocket cost was $700 (IQR, $100-$1600). The mean left-sided heart dose was 2 cGy (range, 0.2-75 cGy), and the mean ipsilateral lung dose was 19 cGy (range, 0.2-164 cGy). CONCLUSIONS Proton APBI is a maturing treatment option with high local control, favorable intermediate-term cosmesis, high treatment satisfaction, low treatment burden, and exceptional heart and lung sparing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Pasalic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | - Eric A Strom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas.
| | - Pamela K Allen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | - Tyler D Williamson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | - Falk Poenisch
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard A Amos
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas; Department of Proton and Advanced Radiation Therapy Group, Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wendy A Woodward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael C Stauder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | - Simona F Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | - George H Perkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | - Welela Tereffe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | - Karen E Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
A prospective feasibility study of MammoSite accelerated partial breast irradiation for early breast Cancer. Ir J Med Sci 2020; 189:1203-1208. [PMID: 32367398 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-020-02237-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accelerated partial breast irradiation is a potential alternative to standard whole breast irradiation, following breast-conserving surgery, in the management of breast cancer. The MammoSite applicator-based technique allows for the delivery of a higher dose of radiation to the tumour bed and adjacent area, over a shorter treatment period. AIMS To investigate the long-term feasibility of the MammoSite technique in early stage breast cancer in an Irish cohort. METHODS Sixty-two patients with early stage breast cancer were enrolled in this prospective study between November 2005 and October 2012 at the University Hospital Galway. A single-entry MammoSite applicator was inserted post-operatively. A CT scan was performed to assess the balloon to skin distance, the conformance of target tissue to balloon surface and balloon symmetry. A total dose of 34 Gy was delivered over 10 fractions twice daily. RESULTS Median follow-up was 10 years. 91.9% (57/62) completed the full course of MammoSite treatment. Technical issues with the MammoSite balloon precluded three patients from completing the full course of treatment. On last follow-up, 6.4% (4/62) of patients had developed an ipsilateral breast recurrence. Half of these recurrences occurred more than 10 years after the initial breast cancer treatment. The most common toxicities observed were fibrosis (67.7%), pain (61.3%) and skin erythema (35.5%). CONCLUSION The use of the MammoSite technique, as an alternative to standard whole breast irradiation, is feasible in a typical Irish clinical setting with integrated multidisciplinary team input.
Collapse
|
14
|
Kennedy WR, Roach MC, Thomas MA, Ochoa L, Altman MB, Hernandez-Aya LF, Cyr AE, Margenthaler JA, Zoberi I. Long-Term Outcomes with 3-Dimensional Conformal External Beam Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020; 10:e128-e135. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
15
|
Jimenez RB, Hickey S, DePauw N, Yeap BY, Batin E, Gadd MA, Specht M, Isakoff SJ, Smith BL, Liao EC, Colwell AS, Ho A, Januzzi JL, Passeri J, Neilan TG, Taghian AG, Lu HM, MacDonald SM. Phase II Study of Proton Beam Radiation Therapy for Patients With Breast Cancer Requiring Regional Nodal Irradiation. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:2778-2785. [PMID: 31449469 PMCID: PMC7351324 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.02366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of proton beam radiation therapy (RT) for patients with breast cancer who require regional nodal irradiation. METHODS Patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer who required postoperative RT to the breast/chest wall and regional lymphatics and who were considered suboptimal candidates for conventional RT were eligible. The primary end point was the incidence of grade 3 or higher radiation pneumonitis (RP) or any grade 4 toxicity within 3 months of RT. Secondary end points were 5-year locoregional failure, overall survival, and acute and late toxicities per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). Strain echocardiography and cardiac biomarkers were obtained before and after RT to assess early cardiac changes. RESULTS Seventy patients completed RT between 2011 and 2016. Median follow-up was 55 months (range, 17 to 82 months). Of 69 evaluable patients, median age was 45 years (range, 24 to 70 years). Sixty-three patients (91%) had left-sided breast cancer, two had bilateral breast cancer, and five had right-sided breast cancer. Sixty-five (94%) had stage II to III breast cancer. Sixty-eight (99%) received systemic chemotherapy. Fifty (72%) underwent immediate reconstruction. Median dose to the chest wall/breast was 49.7 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) and to the internal mammary nodes, 48.8 Gy (relative biological effectiveness), which indicates comprehensive coverage. Among 62 surviving patients, the 5-year rates for locoregional failure and overall survival were 1.5% and 91%, respectively. One patient developed grade 2 RP, and none developed grade 3 RP. No grade 4 toxicities occurred. The unplanned surgical re-intervention rate at 5 years was 33%. No significant changes in echocardiography or cardiac biomarkers after RT were found. CONCLUSION Proton beam RT for breast cancer has low toxicity rates and similar rates of disease control compared with historical data of conventional RT. No early cardiac changes were observed, which paves the way for randomized studies to compare proton beam RT with standard RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alice Ho
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhao H, Williams N, Poppe M, Sarkar V, Wang B, Rassiah-Szegedi P, Huang YJ, Kokeny K, Gaffney D, Salter B. Comparison of surface guidance and target matching for image-guided accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Med Phys 2019; 46:4717-4724. [PMID: 31509632 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigate the feasibility of surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) by comparing it with in-room, fan beam kV computed tomography on rails (CTOR) imaging of the targeted region. The uniqueness of our study is that all patients have multiple daily CTOR scans to compare corresponding SGRT AlignRT (VisionRT, United Kingdom) images to. METHODS/MATERIALS Twelve patients receiving APBI were enrolled in this study. Before each treatment fraction, after patients were setup on tattoos, SGRT was performed using AlignRT, and then target matching was performance using CTOR. The average and maximum difference in shifts between SGRT and CTOR were calculated and analyzed for each patient, so as the correlation between surgical cavity size and shift difference. RESULTS Our study showed that SGRT agreed well with CTOR for patients with small surgical cavity volume changes (<10%). There were nine patients who had a ≥5 mm maximum shift difference between SGRT and CTOR along any direction, and in two patients the difference was more than 10 mm (one patient with surgical cavity change 44.3% and one patient with 27 cc cavity volume decrease). All patients, except one, had a mean shift difference < 5 mm along any direction. CONCLUSION For the patients studied here, SGRT appears to be a reasonable and potentially valuable image guidance approach for APBI for patients who experience small changes in surgical cavity volume (<10%) between CT simulation and treatment. However, there is potential for larger alignment errors (up to 11 mm) when using SGRT for patients who experience larger surgical cavity changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Zhao
- University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Ned Williams
- San Antonio Military Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Dr, Fort Sam Houston, TX, 78234, USA
| | | | | | - Brian Wang
- University of Louisville, 2301 S 3rd St, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Bill Salter
- University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Reyes SA, Williams AD, Arlow RL, De La Cruz LM, Anderson DN, Ugras S, Brooks AD, Sataloff D, Freedman G, Tchou J. Changing practice patterns of adjuvant radiation among elderly women with early stage breast cancer in the United States from 2004 to 2014. Breast J 2019; 26:353-367. [PMID: 31538703 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2018] [Revised: 01/05/2019] [Accepted: 01/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have challenged the need for routine radiation therapy (RT) in women ≥ age 70 with favorable early stage breast cancer (BC) due to modest improvement in local control and no survival benefit. We studied practice patterns in RT among elderly women in the United States. We analyzed data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) of women ≥age 70 diagnosed with T1 or T2 and N0 invasive BC treated with breast conservation surgery (BCS) between 2004 and 2014. Patients were divided into four groups: (1) no RT, (2) partial breast irradiation (PBI); (3) hypofractionation (HF); and (4) conventional whole breast RT (CWBI). Univariable and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to compare characteristics among the four RT groups. A subgroup analysis of women with favorable disease (T1N0 ER + HER2-) was also performed with similar statistical comparisons. Of the 66,126 meeting eligibility, 9,570 (14.5%) had PBI, 16,340 (24.7%) had HF, and 40,117 (60.7%) had CWBI. Only 99 patients (0.15%) had RT omitted. Omission of RT increased marginally from 0.04% in 2004 to 0.24% in 2014. MVA identified older age (OR 1.18, CI 1.08-1.28), more comorbidities (Charlson-Deyo Score of 1) (OR 3.36, CI 1.29-8.72), and no hormone therapy (OR 22.07, CI 5.79-84.07) as more likely to have RT omitted. The use of HF increased from 3.9% to 47.0%, P < .001 with a concomitant decrease in CWBI from 88% to 41%, P < .001. MVA identified older age, treatment location, and omission of chemotherapy as associated with HF. No significant differences from the larger cohort were found among the T1N0 subgroup analysis. Despite RCT evidence, omission of RT was rare in the United States, suggesting that more effective outreach methods to disseminate clinical guideline information may be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia A Reyes
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Rena Rowan Breast Center, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Austin D Williams
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Rena Rowan Breast Center, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Renee L Arlow
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Rena Rowan Breast Center, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Lucy M De La Cruz
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Rena Rowan Breast Center, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - David N Anderson
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Rena Rowan Breast Center, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Stacy Ugras
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Rena Rowan Breast Center, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Ari D Brooks
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Rena Rowan Breast Center, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Dahlia Sataloff
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Rena Rowan Breast Center, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Gary Freedman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Julia Tchou
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Rena Rowan Breast Center, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Experience in multicatheter interstitial high-dose-rate breast brachytherapy: dose-volume histogram analysis of the first results. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2019; 11:349-355. [PMID: 31523236 PMCID: PMC6737577 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2019.87024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report characteristics of our treatment scheme of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy of breast cancer and to show the first outcomes of dosimetric planning analysis based on dose-volume histogram (DVH). Material and methods Since August 2017, 25 patients diagnosed with T1N0M0 breast cancer have received a treatment in our center. There was lumpectomy and following breast HDR brachytherapy (10 fractions of 3.4 Gy) administered to each patient. A planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were recorded with DVH analysis. Results The study describes the full procedure of breast HDR brachytherapy with the lumpectomy. Twenty-five patients were treated, including 9 with cancer of the left breast and 16 of the right breast. The median age was 65 years. The first analysis of DVH data shows that the main OARs were ribs and skin. Mean value of Dmax (ribs) for all patients was 19.90 Gy (55.88% of prescribed dose) and for the skin 30.88 Gy (90.74% of prescribed dose). During the treatment, there was only one case of toxic effects, which was pigmentation on the skin due to excess of dose limit of 1.4 Gy. Therefore, the limit exceeding of 1 Gy does not give any significant toxic effects. Conclusions This study is the first stage of the dosimetric evaluation of a new method. The analysis allows treating complex localizations of the breast cancer, for example, in a close position to the skin or ribs. In order to minimize the toxic effects, it is necessary to consider patient selection, catheter administration, and dose optimization.
Collapse
|
19
|
Manyam B, Shah C, Julian T, Vicini F. Partial-Breast Irradiation: Review of Modern Trials. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-019-00326-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
20
|
Fang P, Jagsi R, He W, Lei X, Campbell EG, Giordano SH, Smith GL. Rising and Falling Trends in the Use of Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy Near the End of Life in Older Patients With Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1721-1731. [PMID: 31141431 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.02067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE End-of-life (EOL) chemotherapy has been described as the most widespread, wasteful, and unnecessary practice in oncology, with benchmarking aimed to reduce physician use of chemotherapy within 14 days of EOL. We evaluated the recent transformation of EOL chemotherapy and targeted therapy practices nationally. METHODS In patients older than 65 years of age who died as a result of breast (n = 19,887), lung (n = 79,613), colorectal (n = 29,844), or prostate (n = 17,910) cancer between 2007 and 2013, we evaluated the guideline-benchmarked measure of chemotherapy use within 14 days of EOL in SEER-Medicare. Comparison outcomes were nonbenchmarked measures of chemotherapy and targeted therapy across time points within 6 months of EOL. Cochran-Armitage test was used to evaluate temporal trends. Multilevel logistic models and intraclass correlation coefficient was used to evaluate variation in EOL chemotherapy use at the physician level. RESULTS From 2007 to 2013, chemotherapy within 14 days of EOL declined from 6.7% to 4.9% of patients (Ptrend < .001; ∆ = -1.8%). Similar declines occurred for chemotherapy within 1 month (Ptrend < .001; ∆ = -1.8%) and 2 months (Ptrend < .001; ∆ = -1.3%) of EOL. In contrast, chemotherapy within 4 to 6 months of EOL rose (Ptrend ≤ .04; ∆ = 0.7% to 1.7%), and 43.0% of all patients received chemotherapy within 6 months of EOL. Frequency of targeted therapy use across all time points within 6 months of EOL was stable to marginally rising from 2007 to 2013 (Ptrend = .09 to .82; ∆ = -0.2% to 1.8%); overall, 1.2% received targeted therapy within 14 days and 3.6% within 1 month of EOL. By 2013, 13.2% of patients received any targeted therapy within 6 months of EOL. In a multilevel model, 5.19% (intraclass correlation coefficient) of variation in 14-day EOL chemotherapy was attributed to the physician level. CONCLUSION With national benchmarking, chemotherapy within 14 days of EOL successfully declined to less than 5%, with comprehensive benchmark uptake by physicians. Results may inform current strategies to help to achieve high-value EOL oncology practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penny Fang
- 1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Weiguo He
- 1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Xiudong Lei
- 1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Grace L Smith
- 1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shah C, Vicini F. Accelerated partial breast irradiation-Redefining the treatment target for women with early stage breast cancer. Breast J 2019; 25:408-417. [PMID: 30950133 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2018] [Revised: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Following breast conserving surgery, the standard of care has been to deliver adjuvant radiation therapy directed to the whole breast (WBI) over a period of 3-7 weeks. Over the past decade, increasing data have supported the concept that treatment to the whole breast may not be required in selected patients, allowing for the emergence of partial breast irradiation (PBI). Multiple randomized trials with 5-10 years of follow-up have been published documenting the safety and efficacy associated with PBI using multiple techniques. Questions that remain to be answered include (a) what is the optimal PBI technique for each clinical scenario, (b) are there additional patients that can be effectively managed with PBI approaches, and (c) are there different techniques/dose schedules that allow for further reduction in treatment duration and/or toxicities? Partial breast irradiation represents a standard approach for appropriately selected patients. PBI provides comparable clinical outcomes to WBI while allowing for a reduction in the duration treatment and the potential for reduced toxicities. Future studies may also help to better define which patients require no radiation, PBI, hypofractionated WBI or conventional WBI, based upon patient, clinical, pathologic features as well as potentially using tumor genetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Frank Vicini
- 21st Century Oncology, Michigan Healthcare Professionals, Farmington Hills, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sambi M, Qorri B, Harless W, Szewczuk MR. Therapeutic Options for Metastatic Breast Cancer. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2019; 1152:131-172. [PMID: 31456183 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-20301-6_8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Metastatic breast cancer is the most common cancer in women after skin cancer, with a 5-year survival rate of 26%. Due to its high prevalence, it is important to develop therapies that go beyond those that just provide palliation of symptoms. Currently, there are several types of therapies available to help treat breast cancer including: hormone therapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy, with each one depending on both the location of metastases and morphological characteristics. Although technological and scientific advancements continue to pave the way for improved therapies that adopt a targeted and personalized approach, the fact remains that the outcomes of current first-line therapies have not significantly improved over the last decade. In this chapter, we review the current understanding of the pathology of metastatic breast cancer before thoroughly discussing local and systemic therapies that are administered to patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer. In addition, our review will also elaborate on the genetic profile that is characteristic of breast cancer as well as the local tumor microenvironment that shapes and promotes tumor growth and cancer progression. Lastly, we will present promising novel therapies being developed for the treatment of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manpreet Sambi
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Bessi Qorri
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Myron R Szewczuk
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Jethwa KR, Park SS, Gonuguntla K, Wick SM, Vallow LA, Deufel CL, Whitaker TJ, Furutani KM, Ruddy KJ, Corbin KS, Hieken TJ, Mutter RW. Three-Fraction Intracavitary Accelerated Partial Breast Brachytherapy: Early Provider and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Novel Regimen. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 104:75-82. [PMID: 30583041 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report early adverse events and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of 3-fraction intracavitary catheter-based partial breast brachytherapy (ICBB). MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible women ≥50 years of age with ≤2.5-cm, lymph node-negative invasive or in situ breast cancer underwent breast-conserving surgery and placement of a brachytherapy applicator. ICBB was initiated on the second weekday after surgery and prescribed to 21 Gy in 3 once-daily fractions. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0; 10-point linear analog scale assessment; the PRO version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; and the Harvard Breast Cosmesis Scale were used for provider and patient-reported assessments. RESULTS Seventy-three women were treated for invasive (79%) or in situ (21%) breast cancer. The median time to completion of surgery and radiation therapy was 6 days. After 14-months median follow-up, 2 patients (3%) had developed breast infections that resolved with oral antibiotics. There was no other treatment-associated adverse event grade ≥2. The grade 1 seroma rate at 3 months was 20%, which dropped to 8% at 12 months; no events required intervention. At 12 months, 91% of patients reported an overall quality of life score as ≥8 of 10, and patient-reported cosmesis was good or excellent in 95%. All patients are alive without relapse at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Three-fraction ICBB is associated with low rates of early provider and patient- reported adverse events and compares favorably with early outcomes of more protracted ICBB regimens, including twice-daily (3.4 Gy × 10) fractionation studied in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-39. Further investigation is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sean S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Stephanie M Wick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Laura A Vallow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | | | - Keith M Furutani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wang K, Yee C, Tam S, Drost L, Chan S, Zaki P, Rico V, Ariello K, Dasios M, Lam H, DeAngelis C, Chow E. Prevalence of pain in patients with breast cancer post-treatment: A systematic review. Breast 2018; 42:113-127. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.08.105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Revised: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
25
|
Imboden S, Knabben L, Mueller MD, Günthert AR, Lössl K. Bone in the breast? Long term toxicity 21 years after interstitial brachytherapy as a boost. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2018; 23:337-340. [PMID: 30127673 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2017] [Revised: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 06/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
An 81-year-old patient developed an exulcerous tumor in her left breast 21 years after breast cancer treatment with lumpectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy. At the time of the initial treatment 21 years ago, whole breast irradiation was performed with a prescribed dose of 48 Gy and a maximal dose of 69 Gy. In addition, the patient received a 14.7 Gy boost with multicatheter brachytherapy as partial breast irradiation. In general, fat necrosis after radiotherapy, surgery or trauma is a minor problem for patients, but can lead to diagnostic difficulties. The incidence varies: the literature indicates that it occurs in up to 34% of cases. The direct pathogenesis is not clear; it can be due to high radiation dose to the breast, dosimetric inhomogeneities or surgical complications (seromas and inflammation). The tumor in the case described here, occurring more than two decades after the primary treatment, is a rarity in this extent and is an unusual clinical, radiological, and histological finding. It provides a good example of the need for an individualized approach to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Imboden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Berne and University of Berne, 3010 Berne, Switzerland
| | - Laura Knabben
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Berne and University of Berne, 3010 Berne, Switzerland
| | - Michael D Mueller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Berne and University of Berne, 3010 Berne, Switzerland
| | - Andreas R Günthert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Kristina Lössl
- Department of Radiooncology, University Hospital of Berne and University of Berne, 3010 Berne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Is miR-144 an effective inhibitor of PTEN mRNA: a controversy in breast cancer. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2018; 54:621-628. [PMID: 30132256 DOI: 10.1007/s11626-018-0282-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the first common cancer among women worldwide. One of the major signaling pathways playing a role in the onset and progression of this disease is PI3K/Akt/mTOR, which can be inhibited by PTEN. miRNAs are small non-coding molecules that regulate the expression of their targets by inhibition or suppression, and thus, their dysregulated expression results in the development of cancer. Using various software applications predicting miRNAs and evaluating GEO microarray data, miR-144 was selected as an inhibitor of PTEN. The expression of miR-144 and PTEN was evaluated in 18 triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) clinical samples and cell lines including 4T1, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, SK-BR-3, and MCF-7 in comparison with normal cells. PTEN and miR-144 expression analysis revealed their elevated expression in MCF-7 cells. MDA-MB-468, SK-BR-3, and MDA-MB-231 cells showed decreased levels of PTEN and increased levels of miR-144. In contrast, 4T1 cells had an increased expression of PTEN and decreased expression of miR-144. In clinical samples, miR-144 was up-regulated in 22% of the cases and PTEN was down-regulated in 78% of the cases. The results showed that the expression of PTEN and miR-144 was inversely correlated in metastatic breast cancer cell lines. However, in TNBC clinical samples, there was no correlation between the expression of miR-144 and PTEN. Literature shows that there are other influencing factors affecting the expression of miRNAs. Therefore, care should be taken in interpreting the results of gene expression studies and its relation with cancer diagnosis/prognosis.
Collapse
|
27
|
Case report of a dose-volume histogram analysis of rib fracture after accelerated partial breast irradiation: interim analysis of a Japanese prospective multi-institutional feasibility study. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10:274-278. [PMID: 30038649 PMCID: PMC6052388 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.76983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
We initiated the first multi-institutional prospective study of accelerated partial breast irradiation for early breast cancer in Japan. Our early clinical results showed that the treatment methods were technically reproducible between institutions and showed excellent disease control at a median follow-up of 26 months in our previous report. At present, total 46 patients from six institutions underwent the treatment regimen from October 2009 to December 2011, and the median follow-up time was 60 months (range, 57-67 months). In 46 patients, we experienced one patient who had rib fracture as a late complication. The dose-volume histogram (DVH) result of this patient was analyzed. The D0.01cc, D0.1cc, and D1cc values of the patient were 913, 817, and 664 cGy per fraction, respectively. These values were the highest values in 46 patients. The average D0.01cc, D0.1cc, and D1cc values of the other 45 patients were 546, 500, and 419, respectively, cGy per fraction. From this result, DVH values showing high-dose irradiated volume (D0.01cc, D0.1cc, and D1cc) seem to be a good predictive factor of rib fracture for accelerated partial breast irradiation. However, further investigation is necessary because of the small number of patients investigated.
Collapse
|
28
|
van la Parra RFD, Liao K, Smith BD, Yang WT, Leung JWT, Giordano SH, Kuerer HM. Incidence and Outcome of Breast Biopsy Procedures During Follow-up After Treatment for Breast Cancer. JAMA Surg 2018; 153:559-568. [PMID: 29387884 PMCID: PMC5875371 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.5572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance No comprehensive data are available regarding the frequency of breast biopsies performed during follow-up of treatment for invasive breast cancer. Objective To determine how often patients treated for breast cancer require breast biopsies during follow-up. Design, Setting, and Participants This nationwide population-based cohort study included 41 510 patients 64 years or younger in a commercial insurance database and 80 369 patients 66 years or older in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Patients were diagnosed with incident invasive breast cancer (stages I-III) from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2011. Diagnosis and procedural codes were used to identify biopsy rates during follow-up. Data were analyzed from March 3 through October 3, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures Cumulative incidence and adjusted risk of breast biopsy and subsequent breast cancer treatment were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. All statistical tests were 2 sided. Results Among the 121 879 patients in the study population, 5- and 10-year overall incidences of breast biopsy were 14.7% and 23.4%, respectively, in the commercial insurance cohort and 11.8% and 14.9%, respectively, in the SEER-Medicare cohort. The 5-year estimated incidence of breast biopsy was higher among women treated with brachytherapy (24.0% in the commercial insurance and 25.0% in the SEER-Medicare cohorts) than among those treated with whole-breast irradiation (16.7% in the commercial insurance and 15.1% in the SEER-Medicare cohorts) and persisted after multivariate adjustment in the commercial insurance (hazard ratio [HR], 1.53; 95% CI, 1.38-1.70; P < .001) and SEER-Medicare (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.63-1.91; P < .001) cohorts. Adjuvant chemotherapy use (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.25-1.37; P < .001) and patient age (>85 vs 66-69 years; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.36-0.44; P < .001) in the SEER-Medicare cohort and endocrine therapy in the commercial insurance (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.93; P < .001) and SEER-Medicare (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.97; P = .002) cohorts were independently associated with biopsy. After unilateral mastectomy, the estimated 5-year contralateral breast biopsy rates were 10.4% and 7.7% in the commercial insurance and SEER-Medicare cohorts, respectively. Of the patients with breast biopsy, 1239 of 4158 patients (29.8%) in the commercial insurance cohort and 2258 of 9747 patients (23.2%) in the SEER-Medicare cohort underwent subsequent cancer treatment. Conclusions and Relevance These data on the need for breast biopsies during follow-up and subsequent treatments from a large cohort of women with commercial insurance and Medicare can be used in the context of therapy-planning discussions and survivorship expectations for patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel F. D. van la Parra
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kaiping Liao
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin D. Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Wei T. Yang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jessica W. T. Leung
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sharon H. Giordano
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Henry M. Kuerer
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Racial disparities in guideline-concordant cancer care and mortality in the United States. Adv Radiat Oncol 2018; 3:221-229. [PMID: 30202793 PMCID: PMC6128037 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2017] [Revised: 02/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose We identified the frequency of racial disparities in guideline-concordant cancer care for select common disease sites in the United States and the impact of guideline concordance on mortality disparities. Methods and materials Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare data, we evaluated patients age >65 years of black or non-Hispanic white race who were diagnosed with stage III breast (n = 3607), stage I (n = 14,605) or III (n = 15,609) non-small cell lung, or stage III prostate (n = 3548) cancer between 2006 and 2011. Chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy (RT) treatments were identified using claims data. Pearson χ2 was used to test the associations between race and guideline concordance on the basis of National Comprehensive Cancer Network curative treatment guidelines. Mortality risks were modeled using Cox proportional hazards. Results Black patients were less likely to receive guideline-concordant curative treatment than non-Hispanic white patients for stage III breast cancer postmastectomy RT (53% black, 61% white; P = .0014), stage I non-small cell lung cancer stereotactic radiation or surgery (61% black, 75% white; P < .0001), stage III non-small cell lung cancer chemotherapy in addition to RT or surgery (36% black, 41% white; P = .0001), and stage III prostate cancer RT or prostatectomy (82% black, 95% white; P < .0001). Disparities in guideline concordance impacted racial mortality disparities. Specifically, hazard ratios that demonstrated elevated all-cause mortality risks in black patients were lowered (and more closely approached hazard ratio of 1.00) after adjusting for guideline concordance. A similar impact for cause-specific mortality was observed. Conclusions Racial disparities in the receipt of curative cancer therapy impacted racial mortality disparities across multiple cancer sites. Benchmarking adherence to guideline-concordant care could represent an opportunity to stimulate improvements in disparities in cancer treatment and survival.
Collapse
|
30
|
Gold HT, Walter D, Tousimis E, Hayes MK. New Breast Cancer Radiotherapy Technology Confers Higher Complications and Costs Before Effectiveness Proven: A Medicare Data Analysis. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing 2018; 55:46958018759115. [PMID: 29502466 PMCID: PMC5846914 DOI: 10.1177/0046958018759115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
A new breast cancer treatment, brachytherapy-based accelerated partial breast radiotherapy (RT), was adopted before long-term effectiveness evidence, potentially increasing morbidity and costs compared with whole breast RT. The aim of this study was to estimate complication rates and RT-specific and 1-year costs for a cohort of female Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with breast cancer (N = 47 969). We analyzed 2005-2007 Medicare claims using multivariable logistic regression for complications and generalized linear models (log link, gamma distribution) for costs. Overall, 11% (n = 5296) underwent brachytherapy-based RT; 9.4% had complications. Odds of any complication were higher (odds ratio [OR]: 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49-1.76) for brachytherapy versus whole breast RT, similarly to seroma (OR: 2.85; 95% CI: 1.97-4.13), wound complication/infection (OR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.52-1.95), cellulitis (OR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.27-1.73), and necrosis (OR: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.55-2.75). Mean RT-specific and 1-year total costs for whole breast RT were $6375, and $19 917, $4886, and $4803 lower than brachytherapy ( P < .0001). Multivariable analyses indicated brachytherapy yielded 76% higher RT costs (risk ratio: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.74-1.78, P < .0001) compared with whole breast RT. Brachytherapy had higher complications and costs before long-term evidence proved its effectiveness. Policies should require treatment registries with reimbursement incentives to capture surveillance data for new technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Eleni Tousimis
- 2 MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
The American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement for accelerated partial-breast irradiation. Brachytherapy 2018; 17:154-170. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Revised: 09/11/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
32
|
Swanick CW, Lei X, Xu Y, Shen Y, Goodwin NA, Smith GL, Giordano SH, Hunt KK, Jagsi R, Shaitelman SF, Peterson SK, Smith BD. Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Older Breast Cancer Survivors: A Population-Based Survey Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 100:882-890. [PMID: 29485067 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.11.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2017] [Revised: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE For older women with breast cancer, local therapy options may include lumpectomy plus whole-breast irradiation (Lump + WBI), lumpectomy plus brachytherapy (Lump + Brachy), lumpectomy alone (Lump alone), mastectomy without radiation therapy (Mast alone), and mastectomy plus radiation therapy (Mast + RT). We surveyed a population-based cohort of older breast cancer survivors to assess the association of local therapy with long-term quality-of-life outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS We used nationally comprehensive Medicare claims to identify women aged ≥67 years in whom nonmetastatic breast cancer was diagnosed in 2009, who were treated with 1 of the 5 aforementioned treatment options, and who were still alive in 2015. From this cohort, 1650 patients (330 patients per treatment) were randomly selected. A survey that included the CanSORT (Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes Research Team) Satisfaction with Breast Cosmetic Outcome, BREAST-Q, Decisional Regret Scale, and EQ-5D-3L was mailed to potential participants. We used multivariable linear regression to assess associations between local therapy and outcomes after adjusting for patient, disease, and treatment covariates. RESULTS Among the 489 women who returned the surveys (30% response rate), the median age at diagnosis was 72 years (range, 67-87 years). The interval from diagnosis to survey completion was approximately 6 years for all patients. Compared with Lump + WBI (adjusted score, 3.40), the CanSORT cosmetic satisfaction scores were higher for Lump + Brachy (score, 3.77; P = .007) and Lump alone (score, 3.80; P = .04) and lower for Mast + RT (score, 3.01; P = .006). Similar trends were seen for BREAST-Q cosmetic satisfaction. BREAST-Q psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being and EQ-5D-3L global health status tended to be better in patients treated with less irradiation and less surgery. BREAST-Q adverse radiation effects were worse for Lump + WBI compared with Lump + Brachy. Decisional regret regarding surgery and radiation therapy did not differ across groups. Compared with patients treated with Lump + WBI, patients treated with Lump + Brachy and Lump alone reported slightly higher rates of in-breast recurrence (excess risk of 5.8% and 6.4%, respectively; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS In this nationally diverse cohort, less irradiation and less surgery were associated with better long-term quality-of-life outcomes. However, patient regret regarding surgery and radiation therapy was similar across all groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron W Swanick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, Florida
| | - Xiudong Lei
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ying Xu
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yu Shen
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Nathan A Goodwin
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Grace L Smith
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Simona F Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Susan K Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Monten C, Lievens Y. Adjuvant breast radiotherapy: How to trade-off cost and effectiveness? Radiother Oncol 2017; 126:132-138. [PMID: 29174721 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2017] [Revised: 10/30/2017] [Accepted: 11/12/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A series of health economic evaluations (HEE) has analysed the efficiency of new fractionation schedules and techniques for adjuvant breast radiotherapy. This overview assembles the available evidence and evaluates to what extent HEE-results can be compared. METHODS Based on a systematic literature review of HEEs from 1/1/2000 to 30/10/2016, all cost comparison (CC) and cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) comparing different adjuvant breast radiotherapy approaches were analysed. Costs were extracted and converted to Euro 2016 and costs per QALY were summarized in cost-effectiveness planes. RESULTS Twenty-four publications are withheld, comparing different fractionation schedules and/or irradiation techniques or evaluating the value of adding radiotherapy. Normofractionation and intensity-modulated, interstitial or intraluminal techniques are important cost-drivers. Highest reimbursements are observed in the US, but may overestimate the real cost. Hypofractionation is cost-effective compared to normofractionation, the results of partial breast irradiation are less unequivocal. Intra-operative and external beam approaches seem the most cost-effective for favourable risk groups, but whole breast irradiation is superior in terms of health effect and omission of radiotherapy in terms of costs. CONCLUSION Hypofractionation may be considered the most relevant comparator for new strategies in adjuvant breast radiotherapy, with omission of radiotherapy as an interesting alternative in the very favourable subcategories, especially for partial breast techniques. Although comparison of CC and CEA is hampered by the variability in clinical and economic settings, HEE-based evidence can guide decision-making to tailor-made strategies, allocating the optimal treatment in terms of effectiveness as well as efficiency to the right indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Monten
- Ghent University Hospital, Radiation Oncology Department, Belgium.
| | - Yolande Lievens
- Ghent University Hospital, Radiation Oncology Department, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lai P, Cai Z, Pignol JP, Lechtman E, Mashouf S, Lu Y, Winnik MA, Jaffray DA, Reilly RM. Monte Carlo simulation of radiation transport and dose deposition from locally released gold nanoparticles labeled with111In,177Lu or90Y incorporated into tissue implantable depots. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 62:8581-8599. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
35
|
Impact of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy on wound healing and cosmetic outcome in 224 women treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation using interstitial brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2017; 16:935-942. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2017] [Revised: 06/02/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
36
|
Yoden E, Nose T, Otani Y, Asahi S, Tsukiyama I, Dokiya T, Saeki T, Fukuda I, Sekine H, Shikama N, Kumazaki Y, Takahashi T, Yoshida K, Kotsuma T, Masuda N, Nakashima K, Matsumura T, Nakagawa S, Tachiiri S, Moriguchi Y, Itami J, Oguchi M. Uncertainty of cosmetic evaluation after accelerated partial breast irradiation: interim analysis of a Japanese prospective multi-institutional feasibility study. Jpn J Radiol 2017; 35:381-388. [PMID: 28474300 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-017-0640-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2016] [Accepted: 04/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We conducted a multi-institutional prospective study on accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using interstitial brachytherapy. The clinical results over a minimum follow-up period of 30 months are presented here. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-six patients with breast cancer were treated with breast-conserving surgery and postoperative APBI. After confirmation of negative surgical margins and negative lymph nodes, a high-dose-rate brachytherapy protocol of 36 Gy/6 fractions was carried out. All clinical data were prospectively collected using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ver. 3.0. RESULTS No recurrence was observed. Cumulative rates of grade 2 or higher late sequelae were 25% for fibrosis, 2% for fractures, 9% for pain, and 9% for soft tissue necrosis. Rates of excellent or good cosmetic results as assessed by the physician and patient were 93 and 89% at the 12-month follow-up and 76 and 74% at the 30-month follow-up, respectively. Large volumes of resected tissue in small breasts were associated with fibrosis of grade 2 or higher. CONCLUSION APBI in Japanese women provides satisfactory clinical results except for cosmetic outcomes. There is some difficulty with the assessment of fibrosis and cosmetic outcomes, especially in patients with small breasts. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER UMIN000001677.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eisaku Yoden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan.
| | - Takayuki Nose
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Otani
- Department of Radiology, Kaizuka City Hospital, Kaizuka, Japan
| | - Shuuji Asahi
- Department of Surgery, Aidu Chuo Hospital, Aizuwakamatsu, Japan
| | - Iwao Tsukiyama
- Department of Radiology, Aidu Chuo Hospital, Aizuwakamatsu, Japan
| | | | - Toshiaki Saeki
- Department of Breast Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Hidaka, Japan
| | - Ichirou Fukuda
- Department of Radiology, National Disaster Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Sekine
- Department of Radiology, The Jikei University Daisan Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoto Shikama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Hidaka, Japan
| | - Yu Kumazaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Hidaka, Japan
| | - Takao Takahashi
- Department of Breast Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Hidaka, Japan
| | - Ken Yoshida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka Medical Collage, Takatsuki, Japan
| | - Tadayuki Kotsuma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Norikazu Masuda
- Department of Surgery, Breast Oncology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Taisei Matsumura
- Department of Radiology, National Hospital Organization National Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Shino Nakagawa
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization National Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Seiji Tachiiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyoto City Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Jun Itami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiko Oguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, The Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Pan HY, Jiang J, Shih YCT, Smith BD. Adoption of Radiation Technology Among Privately Insured Nonelderly Patients With Cancer in the United States, 2008 to 2014: A Claims-Based Analysis. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14:1027-1033.e2. [PMID: 28408078 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2017] [Revised: 02/17/2017] [Accepted: 02/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Despite enthusiasm for advanced radiation technologies, understanding of their adoption in recent years is limited. The aim of this study was to elucidate utilization trends of conventional radiation, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), brachytherapy, proton radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using a large convenience sample of irradiated patients with cancer identified from private insurance claims in the United States. The unit of analysis was a claim corresponding to a fraction of delivered radiotherapy from 2008 to 2014. Each claim was assigned a disease site on the basis of the diagnosis code and a radiation technology on the basis of the procedure code. In 2014, conventional radiation and IMRT constituted 56% and 39% of all radiation treatment claims, respectively, while brachytherapy constituted 2%, proton radiotherapy 1%, SBRT 1%, and SRS <1%. Compared with the first quarter of 2008, the proportional contribution of conventional radiation and brachytherapy to all radiation claims each decreased by 16% in the fourth quarter of 2014. In contrast, proportional contribution increased by 32% for IMRT, 83% for proton radiotherapy, 124% for SRS, and 309% for SBRT. Prostate cancer constituted 60% of all proton claims in 2008 but declined to 37% by 2014. SBRT was used to treat a variety of disease sites, most commonly primary lung (25%), prostate (12%), secondary bone (9%), and secondary lung (9%), in 2014. In this claims-based analysis of younger patients with private insurance, conventional radiation and IMRT were the most commonly used technologies from 2008 to 2014, while SBRT showed the most robust growth over the study period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hubert Y Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jing Jiang
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ya-Chen Tina Shih
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
McGuffin M, Merino T, Keller B, Pignol JP. Who Should Bear the Cost of Convenience? A Cost-effectiveness Analysis Comparing External Beam and Brachytherapy Radiotherapy Techniques for Early Stage Breast Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2017; 29:e57-e63. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2016] [Revised: 10/27/2016] [Accepted: 11/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
39
|
Wang EH, Park HS, Rutter CE, Gross CP, Soulos PR, Yu JB, Evans SB. Association between access to accelerated partial breast irradiation and use of adjuvant radiotherapy. Cancer 2017; 123:502-511. [PMID: 27657353 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2016] [Revised: 08/16/2016] [Accepted: 09/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current study was performed to determine whether access to facilities performing accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is associated with differences in the use of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). METHODS Using the National Cancer Data Base, the authors performed a retrospective study of women aged ≥50 years who were diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer between 2004 and 2013 and treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Facilities performing APBI in ≥10% of their eligible patients within a given year were defined as APBI facilities whereas those not performing APBI were defined as non-APBI facilities. All other facilities were excluded. The authors identified independent factors associated with RT use using multivariable logistic regression with clustering in the overall sample as well as in subsets of patients with standard-risk invasive cancer, low-risk invasive cancer, and ductal carcinoma in situ. RESULTS Among 222,544 patients, 76.6% underwent BCS plus RT and 23.4% underwent BCS alone. The likelihood of RT receipt in the overall sample did not appear to differ significantly between APBI and non-APBI facilities (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.02; P = .61). Subgroup multivariable analysis demonstrated that among patients with standard-risk invasive cancer, there was no association between evaluation at an APBI facility and receipt of RT (AOR, 0.98; P = .69). However, patients with low-risk invasive cancer were found to be significantly more likely to receive RT (54.4% vs 59.5%; AOR, 1.22 [P<.001]), whereas patients with ductal carcinoma in situ were less likely to receive RT (56.9% vs 55.3%; AOR, 0.89 [P = .04]) at APBI facilities. CONCLUSIONS Patients who were eligible for observation were more likely to receive RT in APBI facilities but no difference was observed among patients with standard-risk invasive cancer who would most benefit from RT. Cancer 2017;123:502-511. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elyn H Wang
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Henry S Park
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.,Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center at Yale, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.,Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Charles E Rutter
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.,Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center at Yale, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.,Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Cary P Gross
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.,Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center at Yale, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.,Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Pamela R Soulos
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.,Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center at Yale, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - James B Yu
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.,Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center at Yale, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.,Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Suzanne B Evans
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.,Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center at Yale, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.,Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Shaitelman SF, Amendola B, Khan A, Beriwal S, Rabinovitch R, Demanes DJ, Kim LH, Cuttino L. American Brachytherapy Society Task Group Report: Long-term control and toxicity with brachytherapy for localized breast cancer. Brachytherapy 2017; 16:13-21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.04.392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2015] [Revised: 04/26/2016] [Accepted: 04/26/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
41
|
Smith BD, Jiang J, Shih YC, Giordano SH, Huo J, Jagsi R, Momoh AO, Caudle AS, Hunt KK, Shaitelman SF, Buchholz TA, Shirvani SM. Cost and Complications of Local Therapies for Early-Stage Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2017; 109:2905640. [PMID: 27678203 PMCID: PMC6075189 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djw178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2016] [Revised: 06/09/2016] [Accepted: 06/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Guideline-concordant local therapy options for early breast cancer include lumpectomy plus whole breast irradiation (Lump+WBI), lumpectomy plus brachytherapy, mastectomy alone, mastectomy plus reconstruction, and, in older women, lumpectomy alone. We performed a comparative examination of each treatment's complications and cost to assess their relative values. Methods Using the MarketScan database of younger women with private insurance and the SEER-Medicare database of older women with public insurance, we identified 105 211 women with early breast cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2011. We used diagnosis and procedural codes to identify treatment complications within 24 months of diagnosis and compared complications by treatment using two-sided logistic regression. Mean total and complication-related cost, relative to Lump+WBI, were calculated from a payer's perspective and adjusted for differences in covariables using linear regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Lump+WBI was the most commonly used treatment. Mastectomy plus reconstruction was associated with nearly twice the complication risk of Lump+WBI (Marketscan: 54.3% vs 29.6%, relative risk [RR] = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.82 to 1.91, P < .001; SEER-Medicare: 66.1% vs 37.6%, RR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.69 to 1.82, P < .001) and was also associated with higher adjusted total cost (Marketscan: $22 481 greater than Lump+WBI; SEER-Medicare: $1748 greater) and complication-related cost (Marketscan: $9017 greater; SEER-Medicare: $2092 greater). Brachytherapy had modestly higher total cost and complications than WBI. Lumpectomy alone entailed lower cost and complications in the SEER-Medicare cohort only. Conclusions Mastectomy plus reconstruction results in substantially higher complications and cost than other guideline-concordant treatment options for early breast cancer. These findings are relevant to patients evaluating their local therapy options and to value-based population health management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin D. Smith
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (BDS, SFS, TAB, SMS), Department of Surgical Oncology (BDS, ASC, KKH), Department of Health Services Research (JJ, YCTS, SHG, JH), and Department of Breast Medical Oncology (SHG), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI (RJ); Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (RJ) and Department of Plastic Survey (AOM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ (SMS)
| | - Jing Jiang
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (BDS, SFS, TAB, SMS), Department of Surgical Oncology (BDS, ASC, KKH), Department of Health Services Research (JJ, YCTS, SHG, JH), and Department of Breast Medical Oncology (SHG), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI (RJ); Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (RJ) and Department of Plastic Survey (AOM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ (SMS)
| | - Ya-ChenTina Shih
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (BDS, SFS, TAB, SMS), Department of Surgical Oncology (BDS, ASC, KKH), Department of Health Services Research (JJ, YCTS, SHG, JH), and Department of Breast Medical Oncology (SHG), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI (RJ); Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (RJ) and Department of Plastic Survey (AOM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ (SMS)
| | - Sharon H. Giordano
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (BDS, SFS, TAB, SMS), Department of Surgical Oncology (BDS, ASC, KKH), Department of Health Services Research (JJ, YCTS, SHG, JH), and Department of Breast Medical Oncology (SHG), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI (RJ); Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (RJ) and Department of Plastic Survey (AOM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ (SMS)
| | - Jinhai Huo
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (BDS, SFS, TAB, SMS), Department of Surgical Oncology (BDS, ASC, KKH), Department of Health Services Research (JJ, YCTS, SHG, JH), and Department of Breast Medical Oncology (SHG), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI (RJ); Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (RJ) and Department of Plastic Survey (AOM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ (SMS)
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (BDS, SFS, TAB, SMS), Department of Surgical Oncology (BDS, ASC, KKH), Department of Health Services Research (JJ, YCTS, SHG, JH), and Department of Breast Medical Oncology (SHG), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI (RJ); Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (RJ) and Department of Plastic Survey (AOM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ (SMS)
| | - Adeyiza O. Momoh
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (BDS, SFS, TAB, SMS), Department of Surgical Oncology (BDS, ASC, KKH), Department of Health Services Research (JJ, YCTS, SHG, JH), and Department of Breast Medical Oncology (SHG), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI (RJ); Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (RJ) and Department of Plastic Survey (AOM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ (SMS)
| | - Abigail S. Caudle
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (BDS, SFS, TAB, SMS), Department of Surgical Oncology (BDS, ASC, KKH), Department of Health Services Research (JJ, YCTS, SHG, JH), and Department of Breast Medical Oncology (SHG), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI (RJ); Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (RJ) and Department of Plastic Survey (AOM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ (SMS)
| | - Kelly K. Hunt
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (BDS, SFS, TAB, SMS), Department of Surgical Oncology (BDS, ASC, KKH), Department of Health Services Research (JJ, YCTS, SHG, JH), and Department of Breast Medical Oncology (SHG), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI (RJ); Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (RJ) and Department of Plastic Survey (AOM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ (SMS)
| | - Simona F. Shaitelman
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (BDS, SFS, TAB, SMS), Department of Surgical Oncology (BDS, ASC, KKH), Department of Health Services Research (JJ, YCTS, SHG, JH), and Department of Breast Medical Oncology (SHG), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI (RJ); Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (RJ) and Department of Plastic Survey (AOM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ (SMS)
| | - Thomas A. Buchholz
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (BDS, SFS, TAB, SMS), Department of Surgical Oncology (BDS, ASC, KKH), Department of Health Services Research (JJ, YCTS, SHG, JH), and Department of Breast Medical Oncology (SHG), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI (RJ); Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (RJ) and Department of Plastic Survey (AOM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ (SMS)
| | - Shervin M. Shirvani
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (BDS, SFS, TAB, SMS), Department of Surgical Oncology (BDS, ASC, KKH), Department of Health Services Research (JJ, YCTS, SHG, JH), and Department of Breast Medical Oncology (SHG), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI (RJ); Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (RJ) and Department of Plastic Survey (AOM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ (SMS)
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Grover S, Nurkic S, Diener-West M, Showalter SL. Survival after Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole Breast or Partial Breast Irradiation in Women with Early Stage Breast Cancer: A SEER Data-base Analysis. Breast J 2016; 23:292-298. [PMID: 27988987 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated equivalency in survival outcomes for early stage breast cancer patients treated with either mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with radiation. Recent, state-level data confirm comparable survival outcomes. Using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Research (SEER) data, we sought to evaluate survival outcomes among patients with early stage breast cancer treated with mastectomy, BCS with whole breast irradiation (BCS + WBI), or BCS with accelerated partial breast irradiation (BCS + APBI). Data on women 50 years or older diagnosed with a node negative invasive breast cancer (≤3 cm in size) between 1995 and 2009 were extracted from the SEER data base. Women treated with mastectomy alone or BCS with radiation were eligible for analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) among the treatment groups. 150,171 women fulfilled inclusion criteria. OS was significantly improved among women treated with BCS and WBI or BCS and APBI compared to mastectomy alone. Adjusted hazard ratios for death in BCS with WBI or APBI (versus mastectomy alone) were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.76) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.79), respectively. Adjusted CSS was also significantly improved in patients treated with BCS and WBI (HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.85) as compared to mastectomy. BCS with radiation (WBI or APBI) was associated with significantly improved OS and CSS, versus mastectomy alone. These results support the use of BCS with WBI or APBI (in well selected patients) for the treatment of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surbhi Grover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sommer Nurkic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Marie Diener-West
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Shayna L Showalter
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Snider JW, Mutaf Y, Nichols E, Hall A, Vadnais P, Regine WF, Feigenberg SJ. Dosimetric Improvements with a Novel Breast Stereotactic Radiotherapy Device for Delivery of Preoperative Partial-Breast Irradiation. Oncology 2016; 92:21-30. [PMID: 27898429 DOI: 10.1159/000449388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2016] [Accepted: 08/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Partial-breast irradiation (PBI) with external-beam radiotherapy has produced higher than expected rates of fair-to-poor cosmesis. Worsened outcomes have been correlated with larger volumes of breast tissue exposed to radiation. A novel breast-specific stereotactic radiotherapy (BSRT) device (BSRTD) has been developed at our institution and has shown promise in delivering highly conformal dose distributions. We compared normal tissue sparing with this device with that achieved with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)-PBI. METHODS Fifteen women previously treated with breast conservation therapy were enrolled on an institutional review board-approved protocol. Each of them underwent CT simulation in the prone position using the BSRTD-specific immobilization system. Simulated postoperative and preoperative treatment volumes were generated based on surgical bed/clip position. Blinded planners generated IMRT-PBI plans and BSRT plans for each set of volumes. These plans were compared based on clinically validated markers for cosmetic outcome and toxicity using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS The BSRT plans consistently reduced the volumes receiving each of several dose levels (Vx) to breast tissue, the chest wall, the lung, the heart, and the skin in both preoperative and postoperative settings (p < 0.05). Preoperative BSRT yielded particularly dramatic improvements. CONCLUSION The novel BSRTD has demonstrated significant dosimetric benefits over IMRT-PBI. Further investigation is currently proceeding through initial clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W Snider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Chand-Fouché ME, Lam Cham Kee D, Gautier M, Hannoun-Levi JM. Technique d’irradiation partielle du sein : radiothérapie externe et curiethérapie. Cancer Radiother 2016; 20:587-94. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.07.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2016] [Revised: 07/12/2016] [Accepted: 07/19/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
45
|
Brachytherapy-based Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Provides Equivalent 10-Year Outcomes to Whole Breast Irradiation. Am J Clin Oncol 2016; 39:468-72. [DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
46
|
Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Gold Fiducial Markers for Stereotactic Partial-Breast Irradiation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207:685-8. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.15.14771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
47
|
Harris SR. Differentiating the Causes of Spontaneous Rib Fracture After Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2016; 16:431-436. [PMID: 27498118 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2016] [Revised: 06/26/2016] [Accepted: 07/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Spontaneous rib fracture after treatment for primary breast cancer is not uncommon. Although metastatic disease accounts for about 30% of spontaneous rib fractures and should constitute the first line of diagnostic investigation, other possible contributors include primary osteoporosis or secondary osteoporosis resulting from cancer treatments. Chemotherapy-induced menopause, aromatase inhibitors, radiation therapy, and long-term bisphosphonate use can all contribute to bone fragility, including spontaneous rib fractures in the latter 3. Drawing on recent breast cancer practice guidelines as well as population-based studies of fracture risk for women with a history of breast cancer and systematic reviews, this Perspective will provide an update on recent developments in understanding how to differentiate the possible reasons for non-traumatic rib fracture in women treated for breast cancer. In addition to describing the various possible causes of spontaneous rib fracture, the recommended medical and imaging procedures for differentiating among the potential causes will be presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan R Harris
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Excellent Long-term Breast Preservation Rate After Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using a Balloon Device. Clin Breast Cancer 2016; 16:217-22. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2015] [Revised: 12/14/2015] [Accepted: 02/03/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
49
|
Complications After Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer: A Claims-Based Analysis. Ann Surg 2016; 263:219-27. [PMID: 25876011 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate complications after postmastectomy breast reconstruction, particularly in the setting of adjuvant radiotherapy. BACKGROUND Most studies of complications after breast reconstruction have been conducted at centers of excellence; relatively little is known about complication rates in irradiated patients treated in the broader community. This information is relevant for decision making in patients with breast cancer. METHODS Using the claims-based MarketScan database, we described complications in 14,894 women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer from 1998 to 2007 and who underwent immediate autologous reconstruction (n = 2637), immediate implant-based reconstruction (n = 3007), or no reconstruction within the first 2 postoperative years (n = 9250). We used a generalized estimating equation to evaluate associations between complications and radiotherapy over time. RESULTS Wound complications were diagnosed within the first 2 postoperative years in 2.3% of patients without reconstruction, 4.4% patients with implants, and 9.5% patients with autologous reconstruction (P < 0.001). Infection was diagnosed within the first 2 postoperative years in 12.7% of patients without reconstruction, 20.5% with implants, and 20.7% with autologous reconstruction (P < 0.001). A total of 5219 (35%) women received radiation. Radiation was not associated with infection in any surgical group within the first 6 months but was associated with an increased risk of infection in months 7 to 24 in all 3 groups (each P < 0.001). In months 7 to 24, radiation was associated with higher odds of implant removal in patients with implant reconstruction (odds ratio = 1.48; P < 0.001) and fat necrosis in those with autologous reconstruction (odds ratio = 1.55; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Complication risks after immediate breast reconstruction differ by approach. Radiation therapy seems to modestly increase certain risks, including infection and implant removal.
Collapse
|
50
|
Akhtari M, Teh BS. Accelerated partial breast irradiation: advances and controversies. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER 2016; 35:31. [PMID: 27013323 PMCID: PMC4807571 DOI: 10.1186/s40880-016-0095-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2015] [Accepted: 02/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
The management of localized breast cancer has changed dramatically over the past three to four decades. Breast-conserving therapy, which involved lumpectomy followed by adjuvant irradiation, is now widely considered the standard of care in women with early-stage breast cancer. Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), which involves focal irradiation of the lumpectomy cavity over a short period of time, has developed over the past two decades as an alternative to whole breast irradiation (WBI). Multiple APBI modalities have been developed including brachytherapy, external beam irradiation, and intraoperative irradiation. These new techniques have provided early-stage breast cancer patients with shorter treatment duration and more focused irradiation, delivering very high biological doses to the region at a high risk of failures over a much shorter treatment course as compared with conventional radiotherapy. However, the advantages of APBI over conventional radiotherapy are controversial, including a higher risk of complications reported in retrospective literature and shorter follow-up duration in the intraoperative APBI trials. Nevertheless, APBI presents a valuable alternative to WBI for a selected population of women with early-stage breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mani Akhtari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Weil Cornell Medical College, 6565 Fannin, Ste#DB1-077, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Houston, TX, 77555, USA
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Weil Cornell Medical College, 6565 Fannin, Ste#DB1-077, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|