1
|
Modell SM, Schlager L, Allen CG, Marcus G. Medicaid Expansions: Probing Medicaid's Filling of the Cancer Genetic Testing and Screening Space. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:1066. [PMID: 35742117 PMCID: PMC9223044 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10061066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer is the third largest source of spending for Medicaid in the United States. A working group of the American Public Health Association Genomics Forum Policy Committee reviewed 133/149 pieces of literature addressing the impact of Medicaid expansion on cancer screening and genetic testing in underserved groups and the general population. Breast and colorectal cancer screening rates improved during very early Medicaid expansion but displayed mixed improvement thereafter. Breast cancer screening rates have remained steady for Latina Medicaid enrollees; colorectal cancer screening rates have improved for African Americans. Urban areas have benefited more than rural. State programs increasingly cover BRCA1/2 and Lynch syndrome genetic testing, though testing remains underutilized in racial and ethnic groups. While increased federal matching could incentivize more states to engage in Medicaid expansion, steps need to be taken to ensure that they have an adequate distribution of resources to increase screening and testing utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen M. Modell
- Epidemiology, Center for Public Health and Community Genomics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, M5409 SPH II, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Lisa Schlager
- Public Policy, FORCE: Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered, 16057 Tampa Palms Boulevard W, PMB #373, Tampa, FL 33647, USA;
| | - Caitlin G. Allen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 22 Westedge, Room 213, Charleston, SC 29403, USA;
| | - Gail Marcus
- Genetics and Newborn Screening Unit, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, C/O CDSA of the Cape Fear, 3311 Burnt Mill Drive, Wilmington, NC 28403, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hardy MW, Peshkin BN, Rose E, Ladd MK, Binion S, Tynan M, McBride CM, Grinzaid KA, Schwartz MD. Attitudes and interest in incorporating BRCA1/2 cancer susceptibility testing into reproductive carrier screening for Ashkenazi Jewish men and women. J Community Genet 2022; 13:281-292. [PMID: 35486291 PMCID: PMC9051789 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-022-00590-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) genes are associated with elevated cancer risks in men and women. Due to a founder effect, Ashkenazi Jewish individuals are at higher risk for carrying three specific BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. There have been recent calls for population screening in this population because many carriers do not have family histories suggestive of hereditary cancer. One approach could be to integrate optional BRCA1/2 testing into routinely offered reproductive carrier screening for recessive and X-linked disorders. However, the differing goals of these types of testing (i.e., personal health risks versus family planning) raise questions about the implications for patient education and informed consent. To this end, we aimed to determine interest, attitudes, and preferences regarding integrating such testing by electronically surveying 331 Ashkenazi Jewish participants in JScreen - a national, not-for-profit, at-home carrier screening program focused on genetic risks in Jewish communities. We found that while 41% of participants had plans to pursue BRCA1/2 testing, 93% would have opted for such testing if offered as an add-on to reproductive carrier screening. This was particularly true of those with higher perceived cancer risk and more positive attitudes toward genetic testing. With respect to preferences about delivery of this service, more than 85% of participants preferred remote (telephone, print, or web-based) genetic education rather than traditional genetic counseling. These results suggest that offering optional BRCA1/2 testing within the context of reproductive carrier screening might provide opportunities for cancer prevention without overburdening scarce genetic counseling resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie W Hardy
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Beth N Peshkin
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Esther Rose
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mary Kathleen Ladd
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Savannah Binion
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Mara Tynan
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Colleen M McBride
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Karen A Grinzaid
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Marc D Schwartz
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pace LE, Tung N, Lee YS, Hamilton JG, Gabriel C, Revette A, Raja S, Jenkins C, Braswell A, Morgan K, Levin J, Block J, Domchek SM, Nathanson K, Symecko H, Spielman K, Karlan B, Kamara D, Lester J, Offit K, Garber JE, Keating NL. Challenges and Opportunities in Engaging Primary Care Providers in BRCA Testing: Results from the BFOR Study. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:1862-1869. [PMID: 34173196 PMCID: PMC9198181 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06970-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Engaging primary care providers (PCPs) in BRCA1/2 testing and results disclosure would increase testing access. The BRCA Founder OutReach (BFOR) study is a prospective study of BRCA1/2 founder mutation screening among individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent that sought to involve participants' PCPs in results disclosure. We used quantitative and qualitative methods to evaluate PCPs' perspectives, knowledge, and experience disclosing results in BFOR. METHODS Among PCPs nominated by BFOR participants to disclose BRCA1/2 results, we assessed the proportion agreeing to disclose. To examine PCP's perspectives, knowledge, and willingness to disclose results, we surveyed 501 nominated PCPs. To examine PCPs' experiences disclosing results in BFOR, we surveyed 101 PCPs and conducted 10 semi-structured interviews. RESULTS In the BFOR study overall, PCPs agreed to disclose their patient's results 40.5% of the time. Two hundred thirty-four PCPs (46.7%) responded to the initial survey. Responding PCPs were more likely to agree to disclose patients' results than non-responders (57.3% vs. 28.6%, p<0.001). Among all respondents, most felt very (19.7%) or somewhat (39.1%) qualified to share results. Among PCPs declining to disclose, insufficient knowledge was the most common reason. In multivariable logistic regression, feeling qualified was the only variable significantly associated with agreeing to disclose results (OR 6.53, 95% CI 3.31, 12.88). In post-disclosure surveys (response rate=55%), PCPs reported largely positive experiences. Interview findings suggested that although PCPs valued the study-provided educational materials, they desired better integration of results and decision support into workflows. CONCLUSION Barriers exist to incorporating BRCA1/2 testing into primary care. Most PCPs declined to disclose their patients' BFOR results, although survey respondents were motivated and had positive disclosure experiences. PCP training and integrated decision support could be beneficial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03351803), November 24, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia E Pace
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Nadine Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yeonsoo S Lee
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | | | | | | - Sahitya Raja
- Rush Medical College at Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Kelly Morgan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey Levin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeremy Block
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Katherine Nathanson
- Basser Center for BRCA, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Heather Symecko
- Basser Center for BRCA, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kelsey Spielman
- Basser Center for BRCA, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Beth Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniella Kamara
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jenny Lester
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Nancy L Keating
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The Screen Project: Guided Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer Susceptibility in Canada. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13081894. [PMID: 33920818 PMCID: PMC8071125 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
There is limited information of the outcomes of direct-to-consumer testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. The Screen Project was initiated in 2017 to offer BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic screening to all Canadians over the age of 18 who wish to know their mutation status. Patients enrolled in the study from 2017 to 2019 and were followed for one year after the receipt of a genetic test result. Study subjects registered online and were sent a saliva sample kit, which was shipped to the reference laboratory. Pre-test genetic counselling and counselling for mutation-negative subjects was optional and at the individual's discretion. There were 1269 tested individuals between March 2017 and January 2019. A total of 1157 (93%) were women and 87 (7%) were men. Sixty-six percent had a first- or second-degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer. Of the 1269 tested individuals, 30 (2.4%) had a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (20 women and 10 men). Seventy-five percent of the female mutation carriers underwent a bilateral mastectomy and/or salpingo-oophorectomy within a year of receiving a positive result. Genetic counselling was available at no cost to all participants but was requested by only 5% of the non-carriers. The study subjects expressed a high degree of satisfaction with the process.
Collapse
|
5
|
Hadar T, Mor P, Amit G, Lieberman S, Gekhtman D, Rabinovitch R, Levy-Lahad E. Presymptomatic Awareness of Germline Pathogenic BRCA Variants and Associated Outcomes in Women With Breast Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2021; 6:1460-1463. [PMID: 32644100 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tal Hadar
- Breast Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Pnina Mor
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.,Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Gefen Amit
- Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sari Lieberman
- Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - David Gekhtman
- Breast Imaging Unit, Department of Imaging, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Rachel Rabinovitch
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Ephrat Levy-Lahad
- Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.,Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ginsburg O, Ashton-Prolla P, Cantor A, Mariosa D, Brennan P. The role of genomics in global cancer prevention. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2021; 18:116-128. [PMID: 32973296 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-020-0428-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Despite improvements in the understanding of cancer causation, much remains unknown regarding the mechanisms by which genomic and non-genomic factors initiate carcinogenesis, drive cell invasion and metastasis, and enable cancer to develop. Technological advances have enabled the analysis of whole genomes, comprising thousands of tumours across populations worldwide, with the aim of identifying mutation signatures associated with particular tumour types. Large collaborative efforts have resulted in the identification and improved understanding of causal factors, and have shed light on new opportunities to prevent cancer. In this new era in cancer genomics, discoveries from studies conducted on an international scale can inform evidence-based strategies in cancer control along the cancer care continuum, from prevention to treatment. In this Review, we present the relevant history and emerging frontiers of cancer genetics and genomics from the perspective of global cancer prevention. We highlight the importance of local context in the adoption of new technologies and emergent evidence, with illustrative examples from worldwide. We emphasize the challenges in implementing important genomic findings in clinical settings with disparate resource availability and present a conceptual framework for the translation of such findings into clinical practice, and evidence-based policies in order to maximize the utility for a population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ophira Ginsburg
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
- Section for Global Health, Division of Health and Behavior, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Patricia Ashton-Prolla
- Centro de Pesquisa Experimental, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre and Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Anna Cantor
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Paul Brennan
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yadav S, Hu C, Hart SN, Boddicker N, Polley EC, Na J, Gnanaolivu R, Lee KY, Lindstrom T, Armasu S, Fitz-Gibbon P, Ghosh K, Stan DL, Pruthi S, Neal L, Sandhu N, Rhodes DJ, Klassen C, Peethambaram PP, Haddad TC, Olson JE, Hoskin TL, Goetz MP, Domchek SM, Boughey JC, Ruddy KJ, Couch FJ. Evaluation of Germline Genetic Testing Criteria in a Hospital-Based Series of Women With Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:1409-1418. [PMID: 32125938 PMCID: PMC7193748 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the sensitivity and specificity of genetic testing criteria for the detection of germline pathogenic variants in women with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Women with breast cancer enrolled in a breast cancer registry at a tertiary cancer center between 2000 and 2016 were evaluated for germline pathogenic variants in 9 breast cancer predisposition genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, NF1, PALB2, PTEN, and TP53). The performance of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) hereditary cancer testing criteria was evaluated relative to testing of all women as recommended by the American Society of Breast Surgeons. RESULTS Of 3,907 women, 1,872 (47.9%) meeting NCCN criteria were more likely to carry a pathogenic variant in 9 predisposition genes compared with women not meeting criteria (9.0% v 3.5%; P < .001). Of those not meeting criteria (n = 2,035), 14 (0.7%) had pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2. The sensitivity of NCCN criteria was 70% for 9 predisposition genes and 87% for BRCA1 and BRCA2, with a specificity of 53%. Expansion of the NCCN criteria to include all women diagnosed with breast cancer at ≤ 65 years of age achieved > 90% sensitivity for the 9 predisposition genes and > 98% sensitivity for BRCA1 and BRCA2. CONCLUSION A substantial proportion of women with breast cancer carrying germline pathogenic variants in predisposition genes do not qualify for testing by NCCN criteria. Expansion of NCCN criteria to include all women diagnosed at ≤ 65 years of age improves the sensitivity of the selection criteria without requiring testing of all women with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chunling Hu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Steven N. Hart
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Eric C. Polley
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jie Na
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Rohan Gnanaolivu
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Kun Y. Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Tricia Lindstrom
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Sebastian Armasu
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Janet E. Olson
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Tanya L. Hoskin
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Susan M. Domchek
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, and Basser Center for BRCA, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Fergus J. Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|