1
|
Waltz M, Lyerly AD, Fisher JA. Exclusion of Women from Phase I Trials: Perspectives from Investigators and Research Oversight Officials. Ethics Hum Res 2023; 45:19-30. [PMID: 37988277 PMCID: PMC10759148 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
Over the past 30 years, progress has been made in increasing women's representation in clinical research. However, women continue to be underrepresented in phase I clinical trials-those trials that test the safety and tolerability of investigational drugs, often on healthy individuals. As sex-based differences in adverse drug reactions are often linked to drug dose, pivotal safety information in phase I trials is often insufficiently-and inequitably-captured for females. Yet there has been little attention to how clinical investigators and those charged with overseeing the ethical conduct of these trials perceive the barriers to women's inclusion in phase I trials. To address this gap, we report on 22 interviews with U.S. phase I investigators and institutional review board (IRB) members. Our findings indicate that although these investigators and IRB members acknowledged the importance of including women in clinical trials, they justified women's exclusion from phase I trials by citing the need to manage their reproductive potential. In particular, we identified four key themes that informants used to warrant women's exclusion from phase I trials: the structure of the drug-development system itself, fears about risks to potential fetuses, distrust of women to prevent pregnancy, and concerns about risks and burdens to institutions from resulting pregnancies. We argue that these rationales reflect structural and cultural barriers to women's inclusion in clinical research that ultimately fail to respect female research participants as persons, highlighting the need for broad-based solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Waltz
- Research scientist at the Center for Bioethics and in the Department of Social Medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Anne Drapkin Lyerly
- Professor of social medicine at the Center for Bioethics and in the Department of Social Medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Jill A Fisher
- Professor of social medicine at the Center for Bioethics and in the Department of Social Medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chang DH, Dumanski SM, Ahmed SB. Female sex-specific considerations to improve rigor and reproducibility in cardiovascular research. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2023; 324:H279-H287. [PMID: 36563011 DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00462.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women. Despite recognition of sex-specific differences in cardiovascular health, females are underrepresented across all aspects of cardiovascular research, playing a key role in reducing rigor and reproducibility in cardiovascular research and contributing to these poorer health outcomes. Therefore, we propose a framework to capture factors associated with the female sex at the preclinical, recruitment, data collection, and data analysis stages. In preclinical cardiovascular research, female experimental models are commonly excluded despite similar variability in findings compared with males. To reduce this sex bias, the inclusion of female models and the incorporation of sex as a biological variable are critical to improve reproducibility and inform clinical research and care. Although funding agencies have mandated the inclusion of women in clinical trials, greater efforts are needed to achieve optimal participation-to-prevalence ratio to increase the generalizability of results to real-world settings. Female participants face more stringent exclusion criteria in research compared with males owing to sex-specific factors. However, their routine exclusion from cardiovascular research is not only unethical but limits generalizability and applicability to clinical practice. Identifying sex assigned at birth, collecting information on female sex-specific and -predominant factors associated with cardiovascular health and risk, and stratifying data by sex, including adverse events, are essential to ensure reproducibility and relevance of findings to target populations. Increasing female representation and the incorporation of female sex-specific cardiovascular risk factors in cardiovascular research will not only lead to enhanced rigor and reproducibility but improved cardiovascular health for all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danica H Chang
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sandra M Dumanski
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Alberta Kidney Disease Network, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sofia B Ahmed
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Alberta Kidney Disease Network, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|