1
|
McGuire AL, Cohen IG, Sisti D, Baggott M, Celidwen Y, Devenot N, Gracias S, Grob C, Harvey I, Kious B, Marks M, Mithoefer M, Nielson E, Öngür D, Pallas A, Peterson A, Schenberg EE, Summergrad P, Waters B, Williams MT, Yaden DB. Developing an Ethics and Policy Framework for Psychedelic Clinical Care: A Consensus Statement. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2414650. [PMID: 38833254 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance As government agencies around the globe contemplate approval of the first psychedelic medicines, many questions remain about their ethical integration into mainstream medical practice. Objective To identify key ethics and policy issues related to the eventual integration of psychedelic therapies into clinical practice. Evidence Review From June 9 to 12, 2023, 27 individuals representing the perspectives of clinicians, researchers, Indigenous groups, industry, philanthropy, veterans, retreat facilitators, training programs, and bioethicists convened at the Banbury Center at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Prior to the meeting, attendees submitted key ethics and policy issues for psychedelic medicine. Responses were categorized into 6 broad topics: research ethics issues; managing expectations and informed consent; therapeutic ethics; training, education, and licensure of practitioners; equity and access; and appropriate role of gatekeeping. Attendees with relevant expertise presented on each topic, followed by group discussion. Meeting organizers (A.L.M., I.G.C., D.S.) drafted a summary of the discussion and recommendations, noting points of consensus and disagreement, which were discussed and revised as a group. Findings This consensus statement reports 20 points of consensus across 5 ethical issues (reparations and reciprocity, equity, and respect; informed consent; professional boundaries and physical touch; personal experience; and gatekeeping), with corresponding relevant actors who will be responsible for implementation. Areas for further research and deliberation are also identified. Conclusions and Relevance This consensus statement focuses on the future of government-approved medical use of psychedelic medicines in the US and abroad. This is an incredibly exciting and hopeful moment, but it is critical that policymakers take seriously the challenges ahead.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - I Glenn Cohen
- Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology & Bioethics, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Dominic Sisti
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | | | - Yuria Celidwen
- Othering and Belonging Institute, Department of Psychology, University of California Berkeley
| | | | | | - Charles Grob
- Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Ifetayo Harvey
- People of Color Psychedelic Collective, New York, New York
| | - Brent Kious
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City
| | - Mason Marks
- Florida State University College of Law, Tallahassee
| | - Michael Mithoefer
- Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS) Public Benefit Corporation, New York, New York
| | | | - Dost Öngür
- McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Andrew Peterson
- Department of Philosophy, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
| | | | - Paul Summergrad
- Departments of Psychiatry and Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Monnica T Williams
- School of Psychology & Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - David B Yaden
- Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aaronson ST, Kozak Z. New evidence for flexible psilocybin dosing in patients with treatment-resistant depression. MED 2024; 5:187-189. [PMID: 38359837 DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2024.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
Psilocybin has demonstrated efficacy for treating depression; however, psychiatrically complex patients have been excluded from trials. A recent clinical trial by Rosenblat at al.1 demonstrates feasibility of a flexible dosing schedule of psilocybin in individuals with severely treatment-resistant depression (TRD), including those with co-morbid conditions or bipolar II disorder (BPII), potentially expanding the current treatment paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott T Aaronson
- Institute for Advanced Diagnosis and Therapeutics, Sheppard Pratt Hospital System, Baltimore, MD, USA; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Zofia Kozak
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|