Association Between Drug Use and Subsequent Diagnosis of Lupus Erythematosus

Paradoxical and bimodal immune-mediated dermatological side effects of TNF-α inhibitors: A comprehensive review

INTRODUCTION

Due to the increasing prevalence of immune-mediated diseases such as psoriasis, lichen planus, rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, dermatologists have turned to new biologic drugs known as DMARDs (disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs) in recent years.

AREAS COVERED

In this study, we evaluate the immune-mediated dermatological side effects of DMARDS by reviewing and analyzing previous peer-reviewed research on the effects of TNF-α inhibitors in the treatment of skin diseases, as well as adverse effects of these drugs and some of the main causes of these effects.

EXPERT OPINION

DMARDs are very effective in improving control of the above diseases. TNF-α inhibitors are an important group of DMARDs that are widely used. The paradoxical adverse events (PAEs) associated with the use of TNF-α inhibitors are divided into three categories: true paradoxical, borderline paradoxical, and non-paradoxical. True PAEs include conditions for which TNF-α inhibitors are approved for treatment. Borderline PAEs are considered to occur with this class of drugs for which there is no definite approval but for which there is sufficient evidence. Although these events are rare, early recognition of the accused drug and appropriate decision-making may prevent progression of complications and irreversible side effects.

Proton Pump Inhibitors Associated With Drug-Induced Lupus Erythematosus

This descriptive case series investigates the potential association between the use of proton pump inhibitors and drug-induced lupus erythematosus in cases reported in 2 large pharmacovigilance databases.

Mechanisms of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Inhibitor-Induced Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus induced by biologics mainly results from tumor necrosis factor-alpha remains unclear. The objectives of the study were to investigate the mechanisms of tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor-induced systemic lupus erythematosus. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from thirteen psoriasis patients were cultured and treated with the following: untreated control, Streptococcus pyogenes with or without different biologics. The supernatants were collected for cytokines assay. Analysis of cytokine expression revealed that IL-2 and IL-10 levels decreased only in the TNF-α inhibitor-treated groups but not in the groups treated with biologics involving IL-17, IL-12/IL-23 or IL-23 inhibitor mechanisms (p < 0.001, p < 0.05). The IFN-γ/IL-13 ratio increased significantly in patients with SLE inducing biologics to S. pyogenes induction only compared with non-SLE inducing biologics to S. pyogenes induction only (p = 0.001). IL-2 and IL-10 depletion and a shift to the Th-1 pathway in the innate response are the correlated mechanism for tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor-induced systemic lupus erythematosus.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Cardiovascular Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Background

Previous studies have shown that patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) tend to have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), but the potential causal relationship between genetic susceptibility to SLE and CVD risk is not clear. This study systematically investigated the potential association between genetically determined SLE and the risk of CVD.

Methods

The genetic tools were obtained from genome-wide association studies of SLE and CVD, with no overlap between their participating populations. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was performed using inverse variance weighting as the primary method. Simultaneously, a series of repeated analyses, sensitivity analyses, and instrumental variable strength evaluations were performed to verify the reliability of our results.

Results

MR analysis showed that genetic susceptibility to SLE was associated with a higher risk of heart failure (OR=1.025, 95% CI [1.009-1.041], P=0.002), ischemic stroke (OR=1.020, 95% CI [1.005-1.034], P=0.009), and venous thromboembolism (OR=1.001, 95% CI [1.000-1.002], P=0.014). However, genetic susceptibility to SLE was negatively correlated with the risk of type 2 diabetes (OR=0.968, 95% CI [0.947-0.990], P=0.004). Sensitivity analysis found no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity.

Conclusion

Our MR study explored the causal role of SLE in the etiology of CVD, which would help improve our understanding of the basic disease mechanisms of SLE and provide comprehensive CVD assessment and treatment for SLE patients.

The role of environmental exposures and gene-environment interactions in the etiology of systemic lupus erythematous

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex, chronic autoimmune disease, whose etiology includes both genetic and environmental factors. Individual genetic risk factors likely only account for about one-third of observed heritability among individuals with a family history of SLE. A large portion of the remaining risk may be attributable to environmental exposures and gene-environment interactions. This review focuses on SLE risk associated with environmental factors, ranging from chemical and physical environmental exposures to lifestyle behaviors, with the weight of evidence supporting positive associations between SLE and occupational exposure to crystalline silica, current smoking, and exogenous estrogens (e.g., oral contraceptives and postmenopausal hormones). Other risk factors may include lifestyle behaviors (e.g., dietary intake and sleep) and other exposures (e.g., ultraviolet [UV] radiation, air pollution, solvents, pesticides, vaccines and medications, and infections). Alcohol use may be associated with decreased SLE risk. We also describe the more limited body of knowledge on gene-environment interactions and SLE risk, including IL-10, ESR1, IL-33, ITGAM, and NAT2 and observed interactions with smoking, UV exposure, and alcohol. Understanding genetic and environmental risk factors for SLE, and how they may interact, can help to elucidate SLE pathogenesis and its clinical heterogeneity. Ultimately, this knowledge may facilitate the development of preventive interventions that address modifiable risk factors in susceptible individuals and vulnerable populations.

Cutaneous drug-induced lupus erythematosus: Clinical and immunological characteristics and update on new associated drugs

Cutaneous drug-induced lupus erythematosus (CDILE) is a lupus-like syndrome related to drug exposure which typically resolves after drug discontinuation. It can present as a systemic or a sole cutaneous form and different drugs may be associated with each form. CDILE pharmacoepidemiology is constantly changing. Indeed, older drugs primarily associated with systemic CDILE are no longer prescribed and new drugs associated with either cutaneous or systemic CDILE have emerged. The present study discusses the clinical and laboratory aspects of CDILE and the postulated pathogenesis, and it provides an update on implicated drugs. We performed a literature review to single out the new drugs associated with CDILE in the past decade (January 2010-June 2020). Among 109 drugs reported to induce CDILE in 472 patients, we identified anti-TNFα, proton-pump inhibitors, antineoplastic drugs, and, in particular, checkpoint inhibitors, as emerging drugs in CDILE. Most of the published studies are cases reports or small case series, and further larger studies as well as the development of validated classification criteria are needed to better understand and characterize their implication in CDILE.

A skin in situ immune cell detection kit for the diagnosis and classification of cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Background

Although lupus can be diagnosed by first impression, medical history, physical examination, pathological analysis and laboratory tests, the accurate classification of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE) is still a major challenge in the clinic, which might mislead the selection of treatments and miss the right time for the administration of therapies. The goal of this study was to establish a novel kit to assist with the diagnosis and classification of cutaneous lupus.

Methods

Sixty-five patients from three hospitals were included in this study, including 50 patients with LE and other similar skin diseases. We invited two dermatology specialists to make an accurate diagnosis of the subtypes of lupus based on the patient’s clinical features, laboratory examination tests, pathology manifestation analysis, medical treatments and follow-up records. Then, we used their diagnosis results as a standard to which we successively compared the consistency of each step of our diagnosis processes, including impression diagnosis, pathology diagnosis, the combined consideration of the former two diagnostic analyses, and the results of an in situ immune cell detection kit to assist in arriving at a judgement.

Results

By Cohen’s kappa analysis, we found that the results of the in situ immune cell detection kit had the highest consistency with the diagnoses of the two specialists, both for the diagnosis (k=0.921) and for the classification of cutaneous lupus (k=0.940). In addition, this kit enhanced the LE classification accuracy by 36.3% compared with the diagnostic accuracy of impression diagnosis combined with only pathological analysis.

Conclusions

This skin in situ immune cell detection kit may assist doctors in achieving a higher diagnostic performance and price ratio and enhance their diagnostic efficiency.