Frontal sinus and naso-orbital-ethmoid fractures

[Trauma of the midface : Symptoms, diagnostics and treatment]

Midface fractures present a clinical challenge in otorhinolaryngology due to their often complex injury pattern and nonspecific symptoms. Precise diagnostics, including differentiated imaging procedures, are required. Interdisciplinary consultation between otorhinolaryngology, maxillofacial surgery, neurosurgery, and ophthalmology is often necessary. When selecting radiographic modalities, radiation hygiene should be taken into account. Sonography provides a radiation-free imaging alternative for fractures of the nasal framework and anterior wall of the frontal sinus. The goal of treatment is to achieve stable and symmetrical reconstruction. Depending on the injury pattern, different osteosynthesis materials, individual access routes, and various surgical procedures can be used. In clinical practice, the management of midface fractures requires a multidisciplinary, flexible, and pragmatic approach based on the fracture pattern and clinical experience.

Management of frontal sinus trauma: a retrospective study of surgical interventions and complications

BACKGROUND

Frontal sinus injuries are relatively rare among facial bone traumas. Without proper treatment, they can lead to fatal intracranial complications, including meningitis or brain abscesses, as well as aesthetic and functional sequelae. The management of frontal sinus injuries remains controversial, with various treatment methods and outcomes being reported. This article describes the clinical characteristics, surgical methods, and outcomes among 17 patients who underwent surgery for frontal sinus injury and related complications.

CASE PRESENTATION

We retrospectively included 17 patients who underwent surgery for frontal sinus injury and its related complications at the Kangwon National University Hospital between July 2010 and September 2021. Among them, six underwent simple open reduction and fixation of the anterior wall, eight underwent sinus obliteration, and three underwent cranialization. Two patients who underwent sinus obliteration died due to infection-related complications. The patient who underwent cranialization reported experiencing chronic headache and expressed dissatisfaction regarding the esthetic outcomes of the forehead. Except for these three patients, the other patients achieved satisfactory esthetic and functional recovery.

CONCLUSION

Active surgical management of frontal sinus injuries is often required owing to the various complications caused by these injuries; however, several factors, including the fracture type, clinical presentation, related craniomaxillofacial injury, and medical history, should be considered while formulating the treatment plan. Surgical treatment through the opening of the frontal sinus should be actively considered in patients with severely damaged posterior wall fractures and those at risk of developing infection.

Approaches to the Maxillofacial Skeleton: Application of Standard and Minimally Invasive Techniques

Management of maxillofacial trauma is complex and challenging and requires a clear understanding of facial anatomy and function. There are multiple approaches that can be used to access each anatomical region, each with specific indications and complication profiles. Open, "invasive" approaches are being replaced or augmented with minimally invasive and endoscopic approaches when possible. Thorough knowledge of indications, surgical techniques, and potential complications allows surgeons to make appropriate decisions for access and repair of fractures. This article is a comprehensive review of standard and minimally invasive approaches, with description of techniques and pros and cons for their use.

Balloon Sinuplasty and Stenting in the Management of Complex Frontal Sinus Outflow Tract Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Classical management of complex fractures involving the frontal sinus outflow tract (FSOT) favors obliteration or cranialization to avoid delayed complications. We aim to exhibit success with a novel application of balloon sinuplasty and frontal stenting in the management of complex injuries disrupting the FSOT, which might have otherwise required more invasive interventions.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Single institution, level 1 trauma center.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients presenting to a level 1 trauma center with fractures involving the FSOT. Outcomes include patency of the FSOT on imaging and endoscopy, rate of complications, degree of residual tabular displacement, and need for revision surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria, with complete FSOT obstruction seen in all cases on computed tomography. All patients underwent balloon sinuplasty with frontal sinus stenting; 48% underwent concurrent anterior table repair, and 36% open repair of nasoorbitoethmoid complex fractures. The mean follow-up length was 13.9 months, at which time 91.3% of patients demonstrated radiographic and endoscopic FSOT patency. No residual sinus opacification or pneumocephalus was observed.

CONCLUSION

Balloon sinuplasty with frontal sinus stenting is a straightforward and minimally invasive technique that can create a safe sinus in complex fractures disrupting the FSOT while avoiding the need for more invasive procedures.

Application of a bilateral temporal fascia free graft in a dog with multifragmented frontal sinus and nasal bone fracture

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of temporal fascia free grafts to treat dorsal open comminuted frontal sinus and nasal fractures.

ANIMAL

One Belgian shepherd dog.

STUDY DESIGN

Case report METHODS: A 5-year-old spayed female Belgian shepherd was admitted with severe facial deformation due to trauma. A deep, 3 cm wide wound was present between the nose and the frontal sinus. No abnormalities were detected on neurological examination. On computed tomographic examination, comminuted open fractures of the frontal and nasal bones were associated with a severe depression of the dorsal wall and presence of bone fragments in the sinus cavities. Bone fragments were apposed with polydioxanone monofilament suture. Bilateral temporal fascia grafts were placed over the bone fragments.

RESULTS

The integrity of the frontal and nasal cavities, and the facial profile of the dog were restored. No short-term or long-term complications were observed after 4 months follow up.

CONCLUSION

The innovative combination of suture apposition of bone fragments and a temporal fascia free graft resulted in very satisfying long-term outcomes in a dog with open sinus and nasal bone fractures.

Analysis of Frontal Sinus Fracture Management and Resource Utilization

Frontal sinus fractures require a large amount of force and often occur in the context of a major trauma. Many patients with these fractures are assessed in an emergent setting where stabilization takes precedence. Delayed diagnosis and treatment of a sinus fracture can result in life-threatening conditions, such as a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. A number of different treatment algorithms have been proposed, highlighting the complexity of frontal sinus fracture management. The goal of this study is to determine how patients with frontal sinus fractures were treated at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center and what complications arose as a result of the fracture and subsequent management strategy. Over 9 years, there were 69 reported cases. A total of 63 of these occurred in males (91.3%) versus 6 (8.7%) in females. The majority occurred after a motor vehicle collision (MVC) or a motorcycle collision (MCC). A total of 51 cases were unilateral fractures and 18 were bilateral fractures. Five patients (7.2%) had CSF leakage and 64 (92.8%) did not have CSF leakage. One patient with CSF leakage (20.0%) was managed operatively. Of the 64 patients without CSF leakage, 4 (6.3%) were managed operatively. All operative patients were managed by cranialization. Complications included vision changes, facial pressure, anosmia, facial paresthesia, pneumocephalus, and mucus retention cysts. Vision changes were the most common complication. There did not appear to be any significant difference in complications between the CSF leakage groups, indicating that non-operative management remains a viable option in the management of frontal sinus fractures.

What Is the Role of the Endoscope in the Sinus Preservation Management of Frontal Sinus Fractures?

PURPOSE

The management of frontal sinus fractures has remained controversial. The present study investigated the role of minimally invasive endoscopic surgery in a sinus preservation treatment protocol and described the ideal approach for each frontal sinus fracture type.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study of patients with multiple frontal sinus fracture types. Patient demographic data, including age, gender, and cause of the fracture, were recorded. Four main management methods were proposed. Group A underwent observation only, group B underwent reduction and fixation of the anterior table, group C underwent endoscopic management of the frontal sinus outflow tract (FSOT), and group D underwent cranialization with an assessment of FSOT. The outcome measurements were the correction of the clinical deformity, which was determined by comparison of the preoperative and postoperative images, and the patent frontal sinus drainage, which was measured on the postoperative radiologic sagittal and coronal views of the frontal recess. The long-term outcomes were confirmed by the absence of long-term complications on postoperative follow-up examinations. Statistical analysis and comparisons were performed using SPSS software (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY).

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients (52 men, 8 women; mean age, 29.5 ± 8 years) were included in the present study. Of the 60 patients, 20 were in group A, 20 in group B, 16 in group C, and 4 in group D. All 60 patients had undergone correction of the deformity and had a patent FSOT postoperatively. No long-term complications were encountered in the follow-up period (median, 24 months; range, 12 to 36 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic evaluation of the FSOT is of great importance in the surgical management of frontal fractures, because it allows for sinus preservation. The outcomes achieved in the present study were the result of selecting the right management plan for each fracture type.

A Naso-Orbito-Ethmoid (NOE) Fracture Associated with Bilateral Anterior and Posterior Frontal Sinus Wall Fractures Caused by a Horse Kick-Case Report and Short Literature Review

Naso-orbito-ethmoid (NOE) fractures associated with anterior and posterior frontal sinus wall fractures are among the most challenging cranio-maxillofacial injuries. These represent a major emergency, having a potentially severe clinical picture, with intracranial hemorrhage, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, meningeal lesions, pneumocephalus, contusion or laceration of the brain matter, coma, and in some cases death. In this article, we present the case of a 30-year-old patient with the diagnosis of NOE fracture associated with bilateral anterior and posterior frontal sinus wall fractures caused by a horse kick, with a fulminant post-traumatic alteration of the neurological status and major impairment of the midface bone architecture. Despite the severity and complexity of the case, early initiation of correct treatment both in terms of intensive care and cranio-maxillofacial surgery led to the successful rehabilitation of the neurological status, as well as to the reconstruction and redimensioning of midface architecture and, not least, to the restoration of the patient’s physiognomy.

Evolution of Full Facial Feminization Surgery: Creating the Gendered Face With an All-in-one Procedure

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) has recently gained popularity to enhance the female facial profile and promote a real transformation of the male to female face in transgender patients. The term involves overlapping of the surgical procedures devoted to feminization and represents a dual and reversible procedure unique in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Indeed, FFS envisages modifications of the hard and soft tissues and is both reductive and augmentative. For these reasons, full FFS (F-FFS) is used by surgeons with special expertise in FFS. This study describes a novel approach to F-FFS performed in a single surgery and thus renamed, de facto, all-in-one and representing its most recent evolution. Forty-nine consecutive nonrandomized patients underwent FFS at a private clinical practice (Face Surgery Center, Parma, Italy) between January 2003 and December 2017. Following a retrospective review according to specific inclusion criteria, the authors identified 9 patients aged 19 to 33 years (mean age, 21 years) who underwent all-in-one F-FFS. Patients were discharged the day after surgery with written postoperative care instructions. No reports of wound infection/dehiscence or nerve/vessel damage were recorded. Patients typically returned to work within 30 days following surgery. The mean operative time was 281 minutes (range, 245-305 minutes). The evolved all-in-one F-FFS provides a further step technically (overlapping several procedures) in terms of surgical outcome (higher satisfaction rate) and reduced overall costs and low morbidity.

Orbital Trauma

The orbit is contained within a complex bony architecture with overlying soft tissue that involves many important anatomical structures. Orbital trauma is a frequent cause of damage to these structures. The authors review the literature on reconstructive techniques focusing on fractures of the orbital rim, orbital roof, orbital floor, medial orbital wall, and naso-orbito-ethmoid complex. A thorough literature review was conducted using PubMed analyzing articles relevant to the subject matter. Various search terms were used to identify articles regarding orbital trauma presentation, diagnosis, management, as well as postoperative complications. Articles were examined by all authors and pertinent information was gleaned for the purpose of generating this review. Orbital trauma can result in a wide variety of complications in form and function. Not all orbital fractures require operative repair. However, bony disruption can cause enophthalmos, hypophthalmos, telecanthus, epiphora, cerebrospinal fluid leaks, orbital hematoma, and even blindness to name a few. Timing of operative repair as well as reconstructive method is dictated by the patient's individual presentation. Successful fracture management requires a detailed understanding of the anatomy and pathophysiology to ensure restoration of the patients' preoperative state. Orbital trauma encompasses a wide variety of mechanisms of injury and resulting fracture patterns. A variety of surgical approaches to the orbit exist as has been discussed allowing the surgeon access to all area of interest. Regardless of the fracture complexity, the principles of atraumatic technique, anatomic reduction, and stable fixation apply in all cases.

Surgical Treatment of Anterior Sinus Wall Fracture Due to Sports Accident

Frontal bone fractures represent a low percentage of craniofacial fractures. However, a systematic approach and a correct diagnosis are essential for successful treatment and maintenance of physiology of the frontal sinus and late complications. The purpose of this study was to report a clinical patient with anterior wall fracture of the frontal due to sports accident sinus that was surgically treated.

The Utility of Polyether-Ether-Ketone Implants Adjacent to Sinus Cavities After Craniofacial Trauma

PURPOSE

Polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) implants have become increasingly popular for use in reconstructive procedures. It is imperative to understand the consequences of using this biomaterial in anatomic sites that can pose a risk of infection. Specifically, the use of PEEK in paranasal sinus cavity reconstruction is not well documented. This study examined postoperative complications, namely surgical site infection and implant loss, in patients who underwent paranasal sinus cavity reconstruction using PEEK implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is a single-center case series. Patients who underwent craniomaxillofacial reconstruction with a custom-made PEEK implant in intimate contact with a functional paranasal sinus from June 2013 to May 2017 were included. Baseline characteristics and preoperative and postoperative variables were collected by retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

Eight patients were included in this study. Average patient age was 45.75 ± 19.36 years. Average follow-up duration was 300 ± 263 days. Mean operative time for PEEK implantation was 214.13 ± 66.03 minutes. Implant size ranged from 5 to nearly 100 cm². No patients were diagnosed with acute or chronic sinusitis postoperatively. One patient underwent explantation of his PEEK implant secondary to breakdown of overlying skin that separated from the site of the frontal sinus because of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus epidermis infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Literature review indicates that this is the largest case series reported to date documenting the use of PEEK implants in reconstruction of the region of the paranasal sinuses. Specific biologic, or alloplastic, barriers outside the formation of native scar tissue or regional fasciocutaneous tissues at the sites of reconstruction were not used in these reconstructions, although consideration for placement of these barriers can be at the discretion of the operative surgeon. The authors conclude that PEEK implants can be used in complex craniomaxillofacial reconstructive procedures to achieve near anatomic reconstruction not easily attainable through conventional means. Defects that involve the paranasal sinus cavities with a functional ostium or obliterated sinus cavity can be reconstructed with PEEK implants without increasing the risk of infection and need for explantation. Long-term follow-up and continued outcome results of this treatment modality will be necessary to verify its clinical usefulness in the future.

Facial trauma caused by electronic cigarette explosion

Electronic cigarettes are increasingly popular as a supposed safer alternative to tobacco cigarettes or a smoking cessation tool. Research and debate have focused primarily on possible adverse effects caused by the inhaled aerosol produced by electronic cigarettes and on smoking cessation efficacy. Few reports in the medical literature describe injuries secondary to device malfunction. We present a case of electronic cigarette explosion, with a projectile fracturing the patient's right naso-orbital-ethmoid complex and anterior and posterior frontal sinus tables, with frontal sinus outflow tract involvement. The patient underwent combined open and endoscopic repair, including open reduction internal fixation, with reconstitution and preservation of the frontal sinus and frontal sinus outflow tract. Additionally, we review the available data on electronic cigarette malfunction-including fires, explosions, associated injuries, and possible reasons for device malfunction-and discuss new 2016 U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations pertaining to electronic cigarettes.

Evaluation of a Minimally Disruptive Treatment Protocol for Frontal Sinus Fractures

Importance

Despite common goals of frontal sinus fracture treatment (restoring forehead contour and creating a safe sinus), there remains significant variability in evaluation and treatment.

Objective

To describe our experience with a minimally disruptive treatment protocol for the treatment of frontal sinus fractures.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Analysis of prospectively collected data from 2010 through 2015 at a level 1 trauma center. All patients with frontal sinus fractures treated with our protocol from January 2010 to December 2015. Patients with poor follow-up and/or incomplete medical records were excluded from analysis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Presence of an aerated frontal sinus and aesthetically acceptable forehead contour. Secondary outcome measures were complications related to frontal sinus fractures.

Results

A total of 39 patients were treated under our minimally disruptive protocol, and 25 patients were included in the study; 18 (72%) were male and 7 (28%) were female. Their ages ranged from 6 to 62 years. After review, 22 patients had both clinical and radiographic follow-up. No patients underwent immediate frontal sinus repair. Five of 22 patients underwent surgery for indications other than their frontal sinus fracture: 1 of 5 patients underwent immediate surgical repair due to bilateral LeFort fractures, and 4 of 5 underwent delayed surgery due to nasal polyps (1 patient), scar revision (1 patient), and concomitant LeFort fractures (2 patients). Two of 22 patients (9%) underwent frontal sinus repair after outpatient surveillance due to persistent cerebrospinal fluid leak (1 patient) and orbital roof fracture (1 patient). The remaining 20 patients were treated nonoperatively, and 19 of 20 (95%) had spontaneous improvement in opacification and/or contour deformity. Twelve of 20 patients (60%) had improvement or resolution in both. One patient had ongoing partial opacification and deformity at the 3-month follow-up but was asymptomatic and had bony contour that was aesthetically acceptable to the patient. There were no complications. The median of all follow-up was 3 months.

Conclusions and Relevance

Frontal sinus fractures treated nonoperatively had a high rate of spontaneous ventilation and bony autoreduction with aesthetically acceptable frontal bone remodeling. There were no complications in the nonoperative group. The initial results of this study support further study of the safety and efficacy of a minimally disruptive protocol for frontal sinus fractures.

Level of Evidence

4.

Management of Panfacial Fracture

Traumatic panfacial fracture repair is one of the most complex and challenging reconstructive procedures to perform. Several principles permeate throughout literature regarding the repair of panfacial injuries in a stepwise fashion. The primary goal of management in most of these approaches is to restore the occlusal relationship at the beginning of sequential repair so that other structures can fall into alignment. Through proper positioning of the occlusion and the mandibular-maxillary unit with the skull base, the spatial relationships and stability of midface buttresses and pillars can then be re-established. Here, the authors outline the sequencing of panfacial fracture repair for the restoration of anatomical relationships and the optimization of functional and structural outcomes.

Changing the surgical dogma in frontal sinus trauma: transnasal endoscopic repair

BACKGROUND

Management of frontal sinus trauma includes coronal or direct open approaches through skin incisions to either ablate or obliterate the frontal sinus for posterior table fractures and openly reduce/internally fixate fractured anterior tables. The objective of this prospective case-series study was to evaluate outcomes of frontal sinus anterior and posterior table trauma using endoscopic techniques.

METHODS

Prospective evaluation of patients undergoing surgery for frontal sinus fractures was performed. Data were collected regarding demographics, etiology, technique, operative site, length involving the posterior table, size of skull base defects, complications, and clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (average age, 42 years) with frontal sinus fractures were treated using endoscopic techniques from 2008 to 2016. Mean follow-up was 26 (range, 0.5 to 79) months. Patients were treated primarily with a Draf IIb frontal sinusotomies. Draf III was used in 8 patients. Average fracture defect (length vs width) was 17.1 × 9.1 mm, and the average length involving the posterior table was 13.1 mm. Skull base defects were covered with either nasoseptal flaps or free tissue grafts. One individual required Draf IIb revision, but all sinuses were patent on final examination and all closed reductions of anterior table defects resulted in cosmetically acceptable outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Frontal sinus trauma has traditionally been treated using open approaches. Our findings show that endoscopic management should become part of the management algorithm for frontal sinus trauma, which challenges current surgical dogma regarding mandatory open approaches.

Survey of Current Practice Patterns in the Management of Frontal Sinus Fractures

The management of frontal sinus fractures has evolved in the endoscopic era. The development of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) has been incorporated into management algorithms proposed by otolaryngologists, but the extent of its influence on plastic surgeons and oral and maxillofacial surgeons is heretofore unknown. A cross-sectional survey was performed to assess the practice pattern variations in frontal sinus fracture management across multiple surgical disciplines. A total of 298 surveys were reviewed. 33.5% were facial plastic surgeons with otolaryngology training, 25.8% general otolaryngologists, 25.5% plastic surgeons, and 15.1% oral and maxillofacial surgeons. 74.8% of respondents practiced in an academic setting. 61.7% felt endoscopic sinus surgery changed their management of frontal sinus fractures. 91.8% of respondents favored observation for uncomplicated, nondisplaced frontal sinus outflow tract fractures. 36.4% favored observation and 35.9% favored endoscopic sinus surgery for uncomplicated, displaced frontal sinus outflow tract fractures. For complicated, displaced frontal sinus outflow tract fractures, obliteration was more frequently favored by plastic surgeons and oral and maxillofacial surgeons than those with otolaryngology training. The utility of FESS in managing frontal sinus fractures appears to be recognized across multiple surgical disciplines.

Interrelationship of Structure and Function in Maxillofacial Fractures

Surgical fixation of maxillofacial fractures can be associated with a myriad of surgical complications. Specific complications correlate with the type of fracture. The authors present a case of multiple maxillofacial fractures, briefly review various types of fractures, and discuss the operative decision-making process. This case report serves as an important reminder that the operative decision-making process should take into account a patient's entire clinical condition.

Spontaneous ventilation of the frontal sinus after fractures involving the frontal recess

PURPOSE

Frontal sinus fractures (FSF) have potentially catastrophic consequences due to frontal recess (FR) obstruction and proximity to the brain and orbit. Lack of follow-up and ability to predict which type of fractures predispose to complications has biased surgeons toward definitive interventions such as sinus obliteration and cranialization. These procedures carry inherent risk and may be unnecessary in a subset of patients. This study seeks to better characterize spontaneous ventilation in subjects with FSFs, including those involving the FR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Review of a prospectively maintained trauma database between 2009 and 2013 at a level 1 trauma center. Patients with frontal sinus fractures with follow-up imaging (>6 weeks) available were included. The medical records and imaging were reviewed for evidence of spontaneous ventilation of the frontal sinus.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients sustained frontal sinus fractures in the study period with mean imaging interval of 67.4 weeks (range, 6-188.4 weeks). Injury mechanisms included fall (32%), assault (31%), motor vehicle accident (17%), pedestrian-versus-automobile (12%), and gunshot wound (8%). 8/19 patients (42%) sustained FSFs involving the FR and 7/8 (87.5%) spontaneously ventilated by time of interval imaging. The one patient with persistent radiographic sinus opacification was associated with a naso orbital ethmoid and medial orbital blowout fracture. 6/19 patients (32%) sustained FSF sparing the FR, and all spontaneously ventilated by the time of interval imaging. 5/19 patients (26%) underwent surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

An expectant, sinus-preserving approach to acute FSFs involving the FR is safe and effective. Etiology of re-ventilation failure may be due to tissue obstruction, rather than the frontal recess fracture itself.

Evidence-Based Facial Fracture Management

With demands for an evidence-based approach to patient care, the management of facial fractures will come under increasing scrutiny because there is an overall deficiency in higher level clinical evidence. This article reviews the management of facial fractures, focusing on an evidence-based approach. It focuses on select areas of facial trauma in which there is controversy and presents randomized studies and meta-analysis to help define best practice. The article notes the many areas where the evidenced-based literature is weak and looks at the future of evidence-based facial trauma care.