Periosteal Flap Technique for Elevation of the Pinna in Microtia

Concha-Type Microtia: New Surgical Incision

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of auricles for conchal-type microtia is challenging but rewarding. Many plastic surgeons consider autogenous rib cartilage as the standard material for framework fabrication. A healthy, scar-free skin envelope and a defined cartilaginous framework are also critical to successful ear reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to improve the outcome of the reconstruction and minimize complications by proposing a new surgical incision.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients who underwent auricular reconstruction of concha-type microtia of various etiologies with the new skin flap incision between 2017 and 2022 were included in the study. Patients' clinical data, detailed surgical techniques, and postoperative care were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (21 male, 12 female) were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the patients was 21.51 years at the time of reconstruction. The microtia was on the right side in 17 cases, on the left side in 12 cases, and 4 cases were bilateral; 12 cases were traumatic amputations of the helical component of the auricle, 11 cases were deformities after a burn, and 10 cases were congenital. The mean follow-up time was 17.43 months. A good initial projection without obvious scarring on the anterior surface of the auricle was achieved, with an overall complication rate of 5.42%.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical incision recommended in the study improves the final aesthetic result of the technique without any additional surgical risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Modular Component Assembly Approach to Microtia Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Current methods of microtia reconstruction include carving an auricular framework from the costal synchondrosis. This requires considerable skill and may create a substantial defect at the donor site.

OBJECTIVE

To present a modular component assembly (MCA) approach that minimizes the procedural difficulty with microtia repair and reduces the amount of cartilage to a single rib.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Ex vivo study and survey. A single porcine rib was sectioned into multiple slices using a cartilage guillotine, cut into components outlined by 3-dimensional printed templates, and assembled into an auricular scaffold. Electromechanical reshaping was used to bend cartilage slices for creation of the helical rim. Chondrocyte viability was confirmed using confocal imaging. Ten surgeons reviewed the scaffold constructed with the MCA approach to evaluate aesthetics, stability, and clinical feasibility. The study was conducted from June 5 to December 18, 2014.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was creation of a modular component assembly method that decreases the total amount of rib needed for scaffold construction, as well as overall scaffold acceptability. The surgeons provided their assessments through a Likert-scale survey, with responses ranging from 1 (disagree with the statement) to 5 (agree with the statement). Thus, a higher score represents that the surgeon agrees that the scaffold is structurally and aesthetically acceptable and feasible.

RESULTS

An auricular framework with projection and curvature was fashioned from 1 rib. The 10 surgeons who participated in the survey indicated that the MCA scaffold would meet minimal aesthetic and anatomic acceptability. When embedded under a covering, the region of the helix and antihelix of the scaffold scored significantly higher on the assessment survey than that of an embedded alloplast implant (mean [SD], 4.6 [0.97] vs 3.5 [1.27]; P = .007). Otherwise, no significant difference was found between the embedded MCA and alloplast implants (4.42 [0.48] vs 3.87 [0.41]; P = .13). Cartilage prepared with electromechanical reshaping was viable.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study demonstrates that 1 rib can be used to create an aesthetic and durable framework for microtia repair. Precise assembly and the ability to obtain thin, uniform slices of cartilage were essential. This cartilage-sparing MCA approach may be an alternative to classic techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA.