Is Iatrogenic Implant Contamination Preventable Using a 16-Step No-Touch Protocol?

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative contamination of the surgical field during aesthetic breast augmentation may lead to implant infection with devastating consequences. This study covers a period of 30 years and is divided into 2 phases: a retrospective phase from 1992-2004 when a standard approach was used and a prospective phase from 2004-2022 when a no-touch approach was implemented to avoid contamination.

METHODS

Patients in the standard and no-touch groups underwent aesthetic breast augmentation by the same senior surgeon (FDP) in the same outpatient surgical facility during the 30-year period of the study. Patients are divided into 2 groups: from 1992-2004 and from the implementation of the no-touch protocol in 2004-2022.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent breast augmentation using the no-touch approach developed no infections, whereas the standard group had an infection rate of 3.54% (P = .017). The validity of this finding is discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The no-touch approach as described in this article was effective in reducing implant infection rate when performing aesthetic breast augmentation by 1 surgeon at 1 surgical center during an 18-year observation period. Multicenter prospective cooperative studies are necessary to validate perioperative iatrogenic contamination as the cause of implant infection and to explore optimal approaches that could eliminate implant contamination.

Evaluation of Postoperative Infection Rates in 3084 Rhinoplasty Cases Using Antibiotic Soaks and/or Irrigations

Background: Postoperative infections after rhinoplasties are rare, yet devastating on patient outcomes. The literature reports an overall incidence of <2% with higher numbers seen in those requiring revision procedures. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of rhinoplasty patients from 2002 to 2019 of the primary author (D.M.T.) was performed. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the use of postoperative antibiotic soaks and irrigations in rhinoplasty, as well as evaluate the postoperative infection rates. Results: Of the 3084 rhinoplasty procedures evaluated, there were 19 postoperative infections (infection rate [IR] = 0.62%). Patients without antibiotic soaks or irrigations had 17 infections (IR = 1.01%). The IR of antibiotic soaks was 0.08% with a significant reduction compared with no soaks/irrigations (p = 0.0053). With antibiotic soaks and irrigations, there was 1 infection (IR = 0.49%) with no significant difference between no soaks/irrigations or soaks alone. Conclusions: The use of antibiotic soaks and irrigations resulted in an IR of 0.62%. Antibiotic soaks reduced the rate of postoperative infection, particularly in secondary rhinoplasty. Antibiotic soaks and irrigations are safe, effective, and well-tolerated by patients. As a result, these techniques may be considered in patients undergoing rhinoplasty, particularly those with an extensive revision history, trauma, filler, prior infection, or underlying disease processes.

Use of Nasal Implants and Dorsal Modification When Treating the East Asian Nose

Dorsal augmentation and tip surgery are essential procedures for East Asians seeking rhinoplasty, because they generally have thicker skin and poorly developed nasal dorsum and tip. For dorsal augmentation, many Asian surgeons prefer using alloplastic material, like silicone, Gore-Tex, and filler injection, for cost-effectiveness, easy handling, and short operation times. Compared with autologous implant materials, the use of synthetic implant is suggested to be associated with many complications, such as infection, extrusion, and deviation. However, even with the use of the autologous material, problems such as reabsorption after grafting, donor site complications can take place.

Septorhinoplasty for Destructed Septal L-Strut in Patients with Previously Applied Porous High-Density Polyethylene Implants (Medpor®)

BACKGROUND

Porous high-density polyethylene implants (Medpor^®) have been extensively used for septal extension grafts in Asian rhinoplasty. However, studies on the long-term complications associated with Medpor^® have not been reported. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term complications of septal extension grafts using Medpor^® and present a reconstructive strategy for destructed septal L-struts.

METHODS

We conducted a 12-year retrospective medical chart review of 428 patients who visited our center for septorhinoplasty. Among 428 patients, 43 patients had Medpor^® for septal extension grafts previously applied at other clinics. The quadrangular cartilage was devoid or destructed in the area where Medpor^® was previously applied. Therefore, all patients underwent secondary septorhinoplasty using autogenous cartilage grafts. Patient outcome was assessed to evaluate satisfaction, hardness of nasal tip, functional nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scores, and pain scores. Anthropometric analyses were carried out with patients' photographs. Postoperative complications were also evaluated.

RESULTS

After septal L-strut reconstruction, 87% of patients were satisfied with their aesthetic results. Hardness of nasal tip, NOSE scores, and pain scores also improved after reconstruction. Anthropometric analyses demonstrated that increased nasal length and decreased columellar-labial angle were achieved in patients with short nose deformities. No postoperative complications related to the reconstruction were recorded for any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The devastated destruction of nasal support lines was found after the use of Medpor^® for septorhinoplasty. Therefore, the use of Medpor^® should be reduced. Autogenous cartilage grafts are the last resort for reconstruction of destructed septal L-struts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Investigation of the Antibiofilm Effects of Mentha longifolia Essential Oil on Titanium and Stainless Steel Orthopedic Implant Surfaces

Objective

This study aimed to determine the antibiofilm activity of Mentha longifolia essential oil (EO) against biofilms forming on in-vitro implant surfaces.

Materials and Methods

Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Candida albicans biofilms were used. Stainless steel and titanium samples were grouped as control, water diluted, no EO addition, and reducing amounts of EO doses. The six microorganisms included in the study were investigated to examine if there were differences between the doses on the implant surfaces. The eradication effect of the EO in samples investigated with electron microscope was classified as 0: none, 1: mild, 2: moderate, and 3: severe. The chemical composition of the EO was determined with gas chromatography.

Results

In terms of biofilm formation, no difference was observed between implant surfaces. While S. aureus and C. albicans were observed to be the most susceptible, P. aeruginosa was identified as the most resistant. According to gas chromatography, M. longifolia EO comprised 61.40% carvacrol and 0.28% thymol.

Conclusion

In vitro, M. longifolia EO was shown to be effective against gram negative/positive and fungal biofilms forming on the surface of stainless steel and titanium implants.

Analysis of subclinical infections and biofilm formation in cases of capsular contracture after silicone augmentation rhinoplasty: Prevalence and microbiological study

Background

Implant-related deformities in aesthetic rhinoplasty are a major problem for rhinoplasty surgeons. Capsular contracture is believed to be the pathological cause of delayed contour deformities, comparable to breast implant-related contracture. This study investigated the prevalence of bacterial biofilms and other epidemiological factors related to capsular contracture in cases of silicone augmentation rhinoplasty.

Methods

Thirty-three patients who underwent corrective rhinoplasty due to a delayed contour deformity or aesthetic revision after implant rhinoplasty were studied from December 2014 to December 2016. All recruited patients received surgical correction by the authors. The patients were categorized by clinical severity into four grades. Demographic data and related confounding factors were recorded. Samples of capsular tissue and silicone removed from each patient were analyzed for the presence of a biofilm by ultrasonication with bacterial culture and scanning electron microscopy.

Results

Thirty-three paired samples of capsular tissue and silicone implants from the study group were analyzed. Biofilms were detected in one of 10 subjects (10%) with grade 1 contracture, two of four (50%) with grade 2 contracture, 10 of 14 (71.40%) with grade 3 contracture, and four of five (80%) with grade 4 contracture (P<0.05). The organisms found were Staphylococcus epidermidis (47.10%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (35.30%), and Staphylococcus aureus (17.60%).

Conclusions

As with breast implant-related capsular contracture, silicone nasal augmentation deformities likely result from bacterial biofilms. We demonstrated the prevalence of biofilms in patients with various degrees of contracture. Implant type and operative technique seemed to have only vague correlations with biofilm presence.

Enhancing Facelift With Simultaneous Submalar Implant Augmentation

BACKGROUND

The midface is particularly prone to the senescent changes of soft tissue ptosis and volume loss, which in individuals with aging or low adiposity can manifest as submalar hollowing. Facelift alone in those with submalar hollowing inadequately addresses the volume loss and may result in a gaunt appearance postoperatively. Submalar implant augmentation is a powerful tool for permanent midface volume restoration for a more youthful and natural contour, as opposed to soft tissue fillers that diminish over time. When performed together, submalar augmentation and facelift synergistically enhance facial rejuvenation results.

OBJECTIVES

Determine the long-term safety and efficacy of submalar implant augmentation as an adjunct to facelift.

METHODS

Retrospective review evaluating results and complications in all consecutive patients who had submalar implant augmentation with SMAS-plication facelift in a single surgeon private practice setting from January 1, 1991, to December 31, 2017.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients underwent submalar augmentation with simultaneous facelift with an overall satisfaction rate of 95.7%. Complications included 2.1%transient infraorbital hypoesthesia, 1.1% prolonged swelling, and 1.1% capsular contraction that required a minor adjustment under local anesthesia. No infection, implant migration, or extrusion or facial nerve injury occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Submalar implant augmentation is a safe and effective means of enhancing facelift results through midface volume restoration, subperiosteal release, and improved soft tissue suspension in a more favorable vector. Submalar implant augmentation performed simultaneously with facelift may be an attractive alternative to repeated soft tissue filler or fat injections for patients with submalar hollowing who are interested in facial rejuvenation surgery.

Development of Chronic Sphenoid Sinusitis After Sellar Reconstruction with Medpor Porous Polyethylene Implant

OBJECTIVE

The Medpor porous polyethylene implant is reported to be safe and effective for sellar reconstruction after transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). However, we have observed several cases of delayed chronic sphenoid sinusitis related to the implant. The purpose of this study is to describe the presentation and management of implant-related sphenoid sinusitis after sellar reconstruction.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent endonasal TSS with Medpor sellar reconstruction between December 2008 and January 2013 at a tertiary care institution. Patient demographics, initial surgical management, sinonasal symptoms, postoperative imaging, sinusitis management, and resulting outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

From 2008-2013, 139 patients underwent sellar reconstruction using Medpor. Five patients (3.6%) presented between 8 and 60 months after surgery with chronic sphenoid sinusitis that required surgical management. All 5 patients presented as outpatients for management of headaches and nasal drainage, 4 patients experienced chronic nasal congestion, and 3 patients noted recurrent sinusitis. At the time of revision surgery, all 5 patients were found to have mucosal inflammation and edema surrounding the implant, and 4 of the 5 had an exposed or partially extruded implant that was removed.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction of the sellar floor may be performed after TSS to prevent postoperative complications. Although porous polyethylene implants have previously been described as safe and effective for this purpose, surgeons should be aware of the risk of subsequent implant extrusion and chronic sphenoid sinusitis that can occur in a delayed manner.

Septal Extension Graft in Asian Rhinoplasty

A septal extension graft (SEG) can control nasal tip projection, shape, and rotation. SEG and dorsal alloplastic implants have predominated in Asian rhinoplasty, leading to iatrogenic complications such as a foreshortened nose and destruction of remaining septum. The lower nasal two-thirds can be enhanced anteriorly and caudally using the septal L-strut extension graft in Asians with relatively small noses. The septal L-strut extension graft is indicated in primary cases in which the bony dorsum is acceptable but the cartilaginous dorsum is relatively hypoplastic, and in secondary cases with an iatrogenic short-nose deformity due to alloplastic implants.

Augmentation Rhinoplasty Using Silicone Implants

Augmentation rhinoplasty is one of the most common aesthetic procedures in Asian countries with silicone implant being the most widely used material for augmentation rhinoplasty. Despite potential advantages, use of alloplastic materials in rhinoplasty is often discouraged in Western countries because of concern for possible risk of infection and extrusion of the implant. The collective experience of long-term favorable outcomes in Asia makes the silicone augmentation rhinoplasty a common procedure. Complication rates for silicone implants vary significantly, depending on surgeon experience, surgical technique, and implant design. Silicone implants can be safely used for nasal dorsal augmentation if precautions are taken.

Filler Nodules: Inflammatory or Infectious? A Review of Biofilms and Their Implications on Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

The numbers of minimally invasive cosmetic procedures performed in the United States have steadily increased each year. Concurrently, the rates of filler complications have also increased. Delayed filler reactions and granulomas have recently been attributed to biofilm infections.

OBJECTIVE

The biology and pathogenesis of biofilms, and their diagnosis, treatment, and prevention will be discussed.

METHODS

The relevant and recent literature on delayed filler reactions and biofilms was reviewed.

RESULTS

Increasing evidence implicates biofilm infections in the pathogenesis of delayed filler reactions. Therapeutic and preventative measures can be taken to minimize the occurrence of these potentially devastating consequences of dermal fillers.

CONCLUSION

Awareness of biofilm infections is key in the assessment of filler reactions in order to ensure timely and accurate diagnosis and treatment.

Postoperative Nasal Septal Abscess Following Use of 2-Octylcyanoacrylate and Polydioxanone Plate in Open Septorhinoplasty: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

The employment of 2-octylcyanoacrylate adhesive (Dermabond) to assist graft placement in open septorhinoplasty has been increasingly used to stabilize cartilage grafts. Literature regarding this application has been mixed, with some showing the possibility of increased rates of inflammation, if not infection. We present an original comparative case series involving postoperative septal abscess formation adjacent to caudal strut grafting where both Dermabond and an absorbable polydioxanone (PDS) plate were used.

OBJECTIVE

To report an original comparative case series of patients who developed a postoperative septal abscess following open septorhinoplasty in the context of Dermabond application to affix cartilage to a PDS plate to facilitate caudal septal strut grafting.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative series with relevant clinical photographs, culture studies, and surgical figures.

SETTING

Tertiary medical treatment facility.

RESULTS

Two patients underwent primary open septorhinoplasty with placement of an autologous caudal septal extension graft, which was stabilized using a PDS plate and secured into position using both Dermabond and PDS suture. Postoperatively, both patients presented a nasal septal abscess at an average of 8 weeks that required serial drainage and subsequent removal of the PDS plate in 1 of the patients. Cultures demonstrated mixed flora as well as Proteus mirabilis, previously unreported in the nasal septal abscess literature. In comparison to 8 patients who underwent reconstruction with PDS plate alone (without Dermabond application), this represents a relative risk of 15 ( P value = .053) for a septal abscess complication when Dermabond is employed .

CONCLUSIONS

We present an original case series on our limited, though impactful experience with PDS plate reconstruction using Dermabond to facilitate caudal septal graft placement in open septorhinoplasty. In conjunction with previously reported case series, which demonstrated elevated risk of prolonged inflammation and infection, we would recommend avoidance of subcutaneous Dermabond as an adjunct, particularly in combination with PDS plate utilization.

Heterotopic Intracranial Skin Presenting as Chronic Draining Sinus After Remote Craniotomy

BACKGROUND

Craniotomies for trauma are associated with a significant risk of wound complications. We report a case in which a chronic nonhealing draining sinus was caused by an ectopic epidermal lining deep to the craniotomy bone flap, adherent to the underlying dura.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 61-year-old man was examined for a 3-year-old, nonhealing scalp wound resulting after a traumatic brain injury. His initial surgery consisted of an intracranial hematoma evacuation through a temporoparietal craniotomy; this was complicated by wound dehiscence and a chronic sinus draining clear fluid that did not resolve with antimicrobial therapy. Intraoperatively, a layer of hair-bearing skin adherent to the dura was found deep to the entirety of the previous bone flap. There was no dura tear or overt cerebrospinal fluid leak. This necessitated removal of the skin over the dura as well as the overlying bone flap. The resultant defect was reconstructed with a titanium mesh and hydroxyapatite cranioplasty, with a scalp rotation flap for coverage of the cutaneous defect. Pathology confirmed skin with intact adnexal structures.

CONCLUSION

This case demonstrates that it is possible for hair-bearing skin to grow directly on dura, deep to an intact craniotomy bone flap. With a chronic draining sinus in the absence of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings, this should be part of the differential diagnosis.