Spontaneity Assessment in Dually Innervated Gracilis Smile Reanimation Surgery

Dual versus Single Innervation of Gracilis Free Functional Muscle Transfer in Facial Paralysis: Long-Term Resting and Dynamic Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare long-term tone and excursion in single- versus dual-innervated free functional muscle transfer (FFMT) in patients with longstanding facial paralysis.

METHODS

Patients with longstanding facial palsy treated with an FFMT innervated either by a nerve-to-masseter graft (single-innervation group) or nerve-to-masseter and cross-facial-nerve grafts (dual-innervation group) were included. One-year minimum follow-up was required. Outcome measures, based on standardized photographs, included excursion, smile angle, teeth exposure, commissure height deviation, and upper lip height deviation in repose and in closed and open-teeth smile preoperatively and at 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years postoperatively. Emotrics software and ImageJ software were used to take measurements. Between-group and within-group longitudinal comparisons were analyzed.

RESULTS

At 3 years (single, n = 24; dual, n = 13), significance was found between groups in commissure position (single, 26.42 mm versus dual, 31.51 mm; P < 0.0001) and excursion with open-mouth smile (single, 31.32 mm versus dual, 26.59 mm; P < 0.001). Single-innervation FFMT within-group analysis lacked significant improvement in commissure height deviation and upper lip height deviation at 3 years in repose, whereas the dual-innervation group revealed significant improvements (3.67 mm [ P < 0.001], 3.17 mm [ P < 0.001], respectively). Teeth exposure revealed an increase in the dual-innervation group (single, 35.753 mm 2 versus dual, 64.177 mm 2 ), but significance was not observed.

CONCLUSION

Dual-innervated FFMT revealed improvements in resting tone and teeth exposure with minimal decrease in smile excursion compared with single-innervated FFMT.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Dual-Innervated Gracilis Free Functional Muscle Transfers in Facial Palsy Patients: Comparing Long-Term Outcomes between One- versus Two-Stage Procedures

BACKGROUND

 In facial reanimation, dual-innervated gracilis free functional muscle transfers (FFMTs) may have amalgamated increases in tone, excursion, synchroneity, and potentially spontaneity when compared with single innervation. The ideal staging of dual-innervated gracilis FFMTs has not been investigated. We aim to compare objective long-term outcomes following one- and two-stage dual-innervated gracilis FFMTs.

METHODS

 Included were adult patients with facial paralysis who underwent either one- (one-stage group) or two-stage (two-stage group) dual-innervated gracilis FFMT with ≥1 year of postoperative follow-up. Facial measurements were obtained from standardized photographs of patients in repose, closed-mouth smile, and open-mouth smile taken preoperatively, 1 year postoperatively, and 3 years postoperatively. Symmetry was calculated from the absolute difference between the paralyzed and healthy hemiface; a lower value indicates greater symmetry.

RESULTS

 Of 553 facial paralysis patients, 14 were included. Five and nine patients were in the one- and two-stage groups, with mean follow-up time, respectively, being 2.5 and 2.6 years. Within-group analysis of both groups, most paralyzed-side and symmetry measurements significantly improved over time with maintained significance at 3 years postoperatively in closed and open-mouth smile (all p ≤ 0.05). However, only the two-stage group had maintained significance in improvements at 3 years postoperatively in paralyzed-side and symmetry measurements in repose with commissure position (median change [interquartile range, IQR], 7.62 [6.00-10.56] mm), commissure angle (median change [IQR], 8.92 [6.18-13.69] degrees), commissure position symmetry (median change [IQR], -5.18 [-10.48 to -1.80] mm), commissure angle symmetry (median change [IQR], -9.78 [-11.73 to -7.32] degrees), and commissure height deviation (median change [IQR], -5.70 [-7.19 to -1.64] mm; all p ≤ 0.05). In the between-group analysis, all measurements were comparable in repose, closed-mouth smile, and open-mouth smile (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

 Long-term outcomes demonstrate that both one- and two-stage dual-innervated gracilis FFMTs significantly improve excursion, but only two-stage reconstruction significantly improves resting tone.

Dynamic Repair Surgery for Late-Stage Facial Paralysis: Advances in Restoring Movement and Function

Purpose: Facial paralysis results from congenital or acquired facial nerve damage, leading to significant cosmetic and functional deficits. Surgical resection of parotid and midface tumors can cause facial paralysis, necessitating effective treatment strategies. This review addresses the challenge of restoring movement and function in late-stage facial paralysis, focusing on dynamic repair techniques involving nerve and muscle transplantation. Methods: The review encompasses studies on dynamic repair surgery for late facial paralysis, including techniques such as local muscle flap with pedicle transfer, vascularized nerve flap with pedicle transfer, and multiple muscle flap procedures. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, covering studies from 2000 to 2024. Keywords included "dynamic repair", "late-stage facial paralysis", "nerve and muscle transplantation", "muscle flap", and "tendon transposition". Included were clinical studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses reporting surgical outcomes. Exclusion criteria included studies with insufficient data and non-peer-reviewed articles. Results: Dynamic repair techniques involving nerve and muscle transplantation are essential for treating late-stage facial paralysis. Each surgical method has strengths and limitations. The masseter muscle flap demonstrates high success rates, although it can cause horizontal tension and jaw contour issues. The temporalis muscle flap is effective for smile restoration but may lead to temporal concavity. The gracilis muscle flap is widely used, especially with dual nerve innervation, showing high success in spontaneous smiles but requiring a longer recovery period. The latissimus dorsi flap is effective but can cause edema and shoulder issues. The serratus anterior free flap offers flexibility with precise vector positioning but may not achieve adequate lip elevation and can cause cheek swelling. Combined multi-flap surgeries provide more natural facial expressions but increase surgical complexity and require advanced microsurgical skills. Conclusions: Dual nerve innervation shows promise for restoring spontaneous smiles. One-stage surgery offers faster recovery and reduced financial burden. Comprehensive patient evaluation is crucial to select the most suitable surgical method. Dynamic repair techniques involving nerve and muscle transplantation provide effective solutions for restoring function and aesthetics in late-stage facial paralysis. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, patient satisfaction, and standardizing surgical protocols to optimize treatment strategies.

Composite Sterno-Omohyoid Functional Muscle Transfer for Dual-Vector Smile Reanimation: A Case Series

Background: Facial reanimation flaps often add bulk and produce single-vector smiles, and multivector flaps frequently require challenging intramuscular dissection. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of sterno-omohyoid flap (SOHF) transfer for dual-vector smile reanimation by measuring upper dental show and oral commissure movement. Methods: SOHF transfers from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively evaluated using eFACE and Emotrics software. Results: Four patients with flaccid and one with nonflaccid facial paralysis were identified (four females and one male, median age: 39 years (range: 38-65); two acoustic neuromas, two congenital, one temporal bone fracture). Median follow-up was 20 months (range: 14-26). All flaps received masseteric nerves and two had additional cross-face grafts. Four developed contraction [median time to contraction: 5.5 months (range: 3-10)]. Mean oral commissure excursion and dental exposure improvements were 7.6 ± 4.0 mm (p = 0.03) and 2.9 ± 1.8 mm (p = 0.05), respectively. Dynamic, smile, and midface-smile eFACE improvements were 20.3 ± 6.8 (p = 0.007), 25.5 ± 14.5 (p = 0.03), and 50.5 ± 12.0 mm (p = 0.004) points, respectively. Mean SOHF mass was 14 ± 1.7 g. Conclusion: The SOHF is a small flap that provides dual-vector smile reanimation in flaccid and nonflaccid facial paralysis.

Functional Outcome of Dual Reinnervation with Cross-Facial Nerve Graft and Masseteric Nerve Transfer for Facial Paralysis

BACKGROUND

The combination of cross-facial nerve graft (CFNG) and masseteric nerve transfer (MNT) for reinnervation of facial paralysis may provide advantages of both neural sources. However, quantitative functional outcome reports with a larger number of patients are lacking in the literature. Here, the authors describe their 8-year experience with this surgical technique.

METHODS

Twenty patients who presented with complete facial paralysis (duration, <12 months) received dual reinnervation with CFNG and MNT. The functional outcome of the procedure was evaluated with the physician-graded outcome metric eFACE scale. The objective artificial intelligence-driven software Emotrics and FaceReader were used for oral commissure measurements and emotional expression assessment, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 31.75 ± 23.32 months. In the eFACE score, the nasolabial fold depth and oral commissure at rest improved significantly ( P < 0.05) toward a more balanced state after surgery. Postoperatively, there was a significant decrease in oral commissure asymmetry while smiling (from 19.22 ± 6.1 mm to 12.19 ± 7.52 mm). For emotional expression, the median intensity score of happiness, as measured by the FaceReader software, increased significantly while smiling (0.28; interquartile range, 0.13 to 0.64). In five patients (25%), a secondary static midface suspension with fascia lata strip had to be performed because of unsatisfactory resting symmetry. Older patients and patients with greater preoperative resting asymmetry were more likely to receive static midface suspension.

CONCLUSION

The authors' results suggest that the combination of MNT and CFNG for reinnervation of facial paralysis provides good voluntary motion and may lessen the use of static midface suspension in the majority of patients.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Neurofibromatosis Type II and Facial Paralysis: Clinical Evaluation and Management

BACKGROUND

Facial paralysis secondary to neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) presents the reconstructive surgeon with unique challenges because of its pathognomonic feature of bilateral acoustic neuromas, involvement of multiple cranial nerves, use of antineoplastic agents, and management. Facial reanimation literature on managing this patient population is scant.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was performed. All patients with NF2-related facial paralysis who presented in the past 13 years were reviewed retrospectively for type and degree of paralysis, NF2 sequelae, number of cranial nerves involved, interventional modalities, and surgical notes.

RESULTS

Twelve patients with NF2-related facial paralysis were identified. All patients presented after resection of vestibular schwannoma. Mean duration of weakness before surgical intervention was 8 months. On presentation, one patient had bilateral facial weakness, 11 had multiple cranial nerve involvement, and seven were treated with antineoplastic agents. Two patients underwent gracilis free functional muscle transfer, five underwent masseteric-to-facial nerve transfer (of whom two were dually innervated with a crossfacial nerve graft), and one patient underwent depressor anguli oris myectomy. Trigeminal schwannomas did not affect reconstructive outcomes if trigeminal nerve motor function on clinical examination was normal. In addition, antineoplastic agents such as bevacizumab and temsirolimus did not affect outcomes if stopped in the perioperative period.

CONCLUSIONS

Effectively managing patients with NF2-related facial paralysis necessitates understanding the progressive and systemic nature of the disease, bilateral facial nerve and multiple cranial nerve involvement, and common antineoplastic treatments. Neither antineoplastic agents nor trigeminal nerve schwannomas associated with normal examination affected outcomes.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, V.

Restoring the spontaneous smile through free functional muscle transfer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the last twenty years' experience

BACKGROUND

The recovery of the spontaneous smile has become a primary focus in facial reanimation surgery and its major determinant is the selected neurotizer. We aimed to compare the spontaneity outcomes of the most preferred neurotization methods in free functional muscle transfer for long-standing facial paralysis.

METHODS

The Embase, Ovid Medline, and PubMed databases were queried with 21 keywords. All clinical studies from the last 20 years reporting the postoperative spontaneity rate for specified neurotization strategies [cross-face nerve graft (CFNG), contralateral facial nerve (CLFN), motor nerve to the masseter (MNM), and dual innervation (DI)] were included. A meta-analysis of prevalence was performed using Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation, I2 statistic, and generic inverse variance with a random-effects model. Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess bias and study quality.

RESULTS

The literature search produced 2613 results and 473 unique citations for facial reanimation. Twenty-nine studies including 2046 patients were included in the systematic review. A meta-analysis of eligible data (1952 observations from 23 studies) showed statistically significant differences between the groups (CFNG: 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.00, CLFN: 0.91; 95% CI, 0.49-1.00, MNM: 0.26; 95% CI, 0.05-0.54, DI: 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00, P < 0.001). In pairwise comparisons, statistically significant differences were found between MNM and other neurotization strategies (P < 0.001 in CFNG compared with MNM, P = 0.013 for CLFN compared with MNM, P < 0.001 for DI compared with MNM).

CONCLUSIONS

DI- and CLFN-driven strategies achieved the most promising outcomes, whereas MNM showed the potential to elicit spontaneous smile at a lower extent. Our meta-analysis was limited primarily by incongruency between spontaneity assessment systems. Consensus on a standardized tool would enable more effective comparisons of the outcomes.

The surgical anatomy of the deep temporal nerve: A cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to investigate the surgical anatomy of the deep temporal nerve (DTN) and find (fixed/static) anatomical landmarks that could be used during surgery to localise the DTN branches.

METHODS

Ten hemifaces of Dutch cadavers were dissected at the Department of Anatomy of the Radboudumc. Landmarks and measurements of interest were number of branches of the DTN, distance from the tragus to the DTN, and distance from the cranial and caudal parts of the posterior root of the zygomatic bone until the DTN.

RESULTS

In this cadaveric study, 10 hemifaces were dissected (male, n = 6 [60%]; female, n = 4 [40%]) with an equal left/right side division. The number of deep temporal branches varied from 2 (30%) to 3 (70%) per side. The mean distance to the tragus varied from 40 to 53 mm, with a mean distance of 44.3 ± 4.4 mm. The mean distance from the cranial part of the posterior root of the zygomatic bone to the DTN varied from 29 to 35 mm, with a mean distance of 31.3 ± 2.1 mm. The distance from the caudal part of the posterior root of the zygomatic bone to the DTN varied from 8 to 17 mm, with a mean distance of 13.4 ± 3.4 mm.

CONCLUSION

This study investigated the surgical anatomy and landmarks used for identification of the DTN and its branches. It suggested using firm landmarks for nerve identification, such as the posterior root of the cranial and/or the caudal zygomatic bone.

Age-related outcomes of facial reanimation surgery using gracilis free functional muscle transfer innervated by the masseteric nerve: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The free functional muscle gracilis transfer is an established approach in facial reanimation surgery; however, the significance of its neurotization and the patient's age is still inconclusive. Several donor nerves are available for facial reanimation using the free functional gracilis muscle transfer.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective cohort study investigates whether the masseteric nerve is an equally reliable donor nerve in both older and younger patients.

METHODS

We included 46 patients (13-71 years, male and female) who underwent nerve-to-masseter (NTM)-driven free functional muscle transfer (FFMT) between January 2008 and December 2019. Patients were distributed into three cohorts according to their age at surgery. We assessed the facial symmetry before and after surgery using the pupillo-modiolar angle. Commissure height and excursion deviation were measured with the Emotrics software. Patient-reported outcome measurements were taken using the Facial Clinimetric Examination (FaCE) scale.

RESULTS

All patients had successful flap innervation, except for one patient in the middle-aged cohort (31-51 years). The postoperative facial symmetry at rest, smiling, and laughing was analyzed with the pupillo-modiolar angle and the Emotrics software and showed similar results between all cohorts. The FaCE scale showed similar scores for the middle-aged (31-51 years) cohort and the senior cohort (52-71 years). The social function score in the senior cohort was higher than in the middle-aged cohort, without statistical significance. One patient in the middle-aged (31-51 years) cohort and the senior cohort (52-71 years), respectively, underwent emergency revision due to impaired flap perfusion and could be salvaged.

CONCLUSIONS

NTM-driven FFMT for facial reanimation is a safe and reliable procedure across all age groups of patients.

Donor nerve selection in free gracilis muscle transfer for facial reanimation. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

One of the critical factors in facial reanimation is selecting the donor nerve. The most favored neurotizers are the contralateral facial nerve with a cross-face nerve graft (CFNG) and motor nerve to the masseter (MNM). A relatively new dual innervation (DI) method has shown successful results. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of different neurotization strategies for free gracilis muscle transfer (FGMT).

METHODS

The Scopus and WoS databases were queried with 21 keywords. Three-stage article selection was performed for the systematic review. Articles presenting quantitative data for commissure excursion and facial symmetry were included in meta-analysis, using random-effects model. ROBINS-I tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess bias and study quality.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-seven articles containing FGMT were systematically reviewed. Most studies indicated CFNG as the first choice. MNM was primarily indicated in bilateral palsy and in elderly. Clinical outcomes of DI studies were promising. 13 studies including 435 observations (179 CFNG, 182 MNM, 74 DI) were eligible for meta-analysis. The mean change in commissure excursion was 7.15 mm (95% CI: 4.57-9.72) for CFNG, 8.46 mm (95% CI: 6.86-10.06) for MNM, and 5.18 mm (95% CI: 4.01-6.34) for DI. In pairwise comparisons, a significant difference was found between MNM and DI (p = 0.0011), despite the superior outcomes described in DI studies. No statistically significant difference was found in resting and smile symmetry (p = 0.625, p = 0.780).

CONCLUSIONS

CFNG is the most preferred neurotizer, and MNM is a reliable second option. Outcomes of DI studies are promising, but more comparison studies are needed to draw conclusions. Our meta-analysis was limited by incompatibility of the assessment scales. Consensus on a standardized assessment system would add value to future studies.

Race and sex demographics in the surgical management of facial nerve palsy

Objective

Facial palsy affects patients of all backgrounds, yet no existing studies describe differences in its treatment patterns between demographic groups.

Methods

We used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database to investigate whether race and sex disparities exist in facial reanimation surgery. Patients were identified using CPT codes corresponding to facial-nerve procedures.

Results

Seven hundred sixty-one patients met criteria; 681 self-identified as White (89.5%), 51 as Black (6.7%), 43 as Hispanic (5.6%), 23 as Asian (3.0%), and 5 patients as other (0.61%). White patients were more than twice as likely to undergo brow ptosis repair than Non-White patients (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.16-6.15, p = .03). After controlling for malignancy, men had longer operative times than women (480.2 vs. 413.9 min, p = .04) and higher likelihood of free tissue transfer (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.9-9.8), fascial free tissue transfer (OR 10.7, 95% CI 2.1-195), and ectropion repair (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.8).

Conclusion

Most patients undergoing facial reanimation surgery in the United States are White. Men have longer operative times and a higher likelihood of undergoing free fascial grafts and cutaneous and fascial free tissue transfer than women regardless of malignancy status.

Level of Evidence

2c.

Evidence-Based Medicine: Facial Reanimation

This article provides a brief historical overview of the assessment instruments that have been developed to categorize the severity of disease in patients with facial palsy. Important advances in the quality of these instruments are discussed. The modern-day instruments that are commonly required for evidence-based patient assessment are then presented, with emphasis on the level of evidence of the studies that describe these instruments.

Microvascular Gracilis Free Flap: Single and Double Innervation

Facial paralysis (FP) is a devastating condition that can lead to significant aesthetic, social, and emotional morbidities for patients. For some patients with FP, free gracilis muscle transfer (FGMT) is the best option for smile restoration. Masseteric-driven FGMT produces a reliable voluntary smile. Cross-face nerve graft-driven FGMT can produce a spontaneous smile, but this technique has higher failure rates. Early studies suggest dual-innervation FGMT can produce a spontaneous smile while maintaining the reliability of masseteric-driven procedures. Great care should be taken during FGMT surgery to minimize facial bulk and place medial inset sutures that create a natural-appearing smile.

The evolution of facial reanimation techniques

This review article provides an updated discussion on evidence-based practices related to the evaluation and management of facial paralysis. Ultimately, the goals of facial reanimation include obtaining facial symmetry at rest, providing corneal protection, restoring smile symmetry and facial movement for functional and aesthetic purposes. The treatment of facial nerve injury is highly individualized, especially given the wide heterogeneity regarding the degree of initial neuronal insult and eventual functional outcome. Recent advancements in facial reanimation techniques have better equipped clinicians to approach challenging patient scenarios with reliable, effective strategies. We discuss how technology such as machine learning software has revolutionized pre- and post-intervention assessments and provide an overview of current controversies including timing of intervention, choice of donor nerve, and management of nonflaccid facial palsy with synkinesis. We highlight novel considerations to mainstay conservative management strategies and examine innovations in modern surgical techniques with a focus on gracilis free muscle transfer. Innervation sources, procedural staging, coaptation patterns, and multi-vector and multi-muscle paddle design are modifications that have significantly evolved over the past decade.

Facial reanimation using free partial latissimus dorsi muscle transfer: Single versus dual innervation method

The aim of the present study was to analyze the consequences of partial free latissimus dorsi muscle flap with nerve splitting technique (Partial LD transfer) for facial reanimation and compare outcomes according to innervation method (singer versus dual innervation). Patients with complete unilateral facial paralysis underwent either the single (ipsilateral masseteric nerve only) or dual (ipsilateral masseteric nerve plus contralateral buccal branch of the facial nerve) nerve innervation method for facial reanimation. An assessment was carried out to compare the outcomes between the single and dual innervation. Total of 21 patients were involved in this study. In the single innervation group, 7 out of 8 patients developed a voluntary smile. However, none were able to achieve a spontaneous smile. On the other hand, 9 out of 13 patients developed a voluntary smile and 3 out of 13 patients achieved a spontaneous smile. The mean increases of smile excursion assessed by Emotrics software and Terzis grades showed no significant differences between two groups. Within the limitations of the study it seems that partial LD transfer approach utilizing the dual innervation method has a positive effect on achieving a spontaneous smile and could be a valuable option for facial reanimation.

Automated Spontaneity Assessment after Smile Reanimation: A Machine Learning Approach

BACKGROUND

Recreation of a spontaneous, emotional smile remains a paramount goal of smile reanimation surgery. However, optimal techniques to reliably restore spontaneity remain unknown. Dual automated machine-learning tools were used to develop an objective tool to analyze spontaneous smiling. The feasibility of this tool was tested in a sample of functional free muscle transfers.

METHODS

Validated humorous videos were used to elicit spontaneous smiles. Automated facial landmark recognition (Emotrics) and emotion detection software (Affdex) were used to analyze video clips of spontaneous smiling in nine normal subjects and 39 facial reanimation cases. Emotionality quotient was used to quantify the ability of spontaneous smiles to express joy.

RESULTS

The software could analyze spontaneous smiling in all subjects. Spontaneous smiles of normal subjects exhibited median 100 percent joy and 0 percent negative emotion (emotional quotient score, +100/0). Spontaneous smiles of facial palsy patients after smile reanimation, using cross-facial nerve graft, masseteric nerve, and dual innervation, yielded median emotional quotient scores of +82/0, 0/-48, and +10/-24 respectively (joy, p = 0.006; negative emotion, p = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Computer vision software can objectively quantify spontaneous smiling outcomes. Of the retrospective sample of cases reviewed in this study, cross-facial nerve graft-innervated gracilis functional free muscle transfer achieved a greater degree of emotionality during spontaneous smiling than masseteric or dually innervated transfer. Quantification of spontaneous smiling from standard video clips could facilitate future, blinded, multicenter trials with sufficient long-term follow-up to definitively establish the rates of spontaneity from a range of reanimation procedures.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic, IV.

Age-related outcome of facial reanimation surgery using cross face nerve graft and gracilis free functional muscle transfer-A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Free functional muscle transfer has become the criterion standard for the treatment of long-standing flaccid facial paralysis. Clinical experience suggests that a two-stage approach using a cross-face nerve graft (CFNG) as a donor nerve for free functional muscle transfers (FFMT) is less successful in older patients when compared to the pediatric population. However, clear data and scientific evidence are still rare. This study examines the age-related outcome of CFNG-driven FFMT.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with a mean age of 20.73 years (ranging 5-51 years) who received two-stage facial reanimation with CFNG-driven gracilis FFMT at our institution from 1998 to 2019 were included. The ipsilateral sural nerve was used as CFNG. After 12 months, the ipsilateral gracilis muscle was used as FFMT. Patients were distributed equally into three cohorts according to their age. We assessed facial symmetry before and after facial reanimation measuring the angle between the interpupillary and the intermodiolar line (pupillo-modiolar angle). Additionally, the commissure height was measured using the Emotrics software.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up of the pediatric, young adults and the middle-aged cohort was 29.5 ± 7.3, 24.9 ± 6.3, and 25.5 ± 12.4 months, respectively. One patient suffered flap loss due to flap ischemia. Four patients suffered insufficient innervation of the FFMT. Otherwise no major complication occurred. The likelihood of successful innervation of the FFMT was significantly higher in patients younger than 31 years (100% vs. 50%; p = .003). Smiling facial symmetry (pupillo-modiolar angle) significantly improved in the pediatric cohort (5-16 years; 8.68° ± 0.69° to 1.48° ± 0.67°; p < .001) and the young adults' cohort (17-30 years; 11.55° ± 1.95° to 4.62° ± 1.08°; p = .005), but improved only slightly in the middle-aged cohort (31-51 years; 11.77° ± 1.16° to 9.4° ± 1.8° p = .27). The postoperative smiling symmetry showed a significant correlation with increasing age (r = .62, p < .001). The smiling commissure height deviation significantly improved in the pediatric cohort (5-16 years; 6.5-2.3 mm; p = .006) and the postoperative result was significantly better than the middle-aged group (31-51 years; 2.3 vs. 7.5 mm; p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of CFNG-driven gracilis FFMT is age-related. Static as well as dynamic facial symmetry after two-stage facial reanimation was best in the pediatric and young adult population. For older patients, other approaches like the nerve-to-masseter-driven FFMT should be considered.

Supercharged massetric-facial cross-graft for gracilis reinnervation in unilateral facial palsy treatment

BACKGROUND

The choice of neurotization source for gracilis neuromuscular transplant is a key point in the treatment of unilateral long-standing paralysis. To combine the advantages of different donor nerves and overcome their disadvantages, mixed neurotization sources have been described with encouraging results. The authors present a preliminary report of a novel technique, the "supercharged" cross-graft, a two-step technique consisting of a double powered cross nerve graft provided by a zygomatic branch of the healthy facial nerve and the masseter nerve of the healthy side.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2015 to December 2019 eight patients, aged between 19 and 61 years old (mean age at surgery 33.62) suffering unilateral established paralysis (congenital or acquired, >24 months) underwent gracilis reinnervation with the supercharged cross grafting technique. Subjects underwent a two-step surgical rehabilitation: in the first operation sural nerve was harvested and used as cross-graft cooptated by healthy side facial nerve branch and masseteric nerve. During second procedure gracilis neuromuscular transplant was performed reinnervarting the muscle with the cross-graft. Patients were evaluated using Emotrics software, which allowed for automated facial measurements on post-operative pictures taken at the last follow-up. The results of the different poses were compared to assess the contribution to smile excursion by the masseter and facial nerve, together and separately. Finally, we analyzed spontaneous smile to assess whether masseteric contribution is used in daily life.

RESULTS

No major or minor complications occurred. Follow-up time ranged from 12 to 41 months, with a mean of 22.75 months. A good commissure excursion (mean 33.84 mm) was obtained during smile with no teeth clenching (without masseter activation), as well as during teeth clenching without smiling (activation of gracilis only - mean 32.55). When smiling and biting simultaneously the excursion was greater than the single two components (mean 35.91). In spontaneous smile, commissure excursion was higher (mean 34.23) than that provided by only the facial nerve (smile only) in most patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel technique of mixed neurotization for gracilis transplant shows consistent results with powerful contraction and good smile coordination. It also allows us to extend the indications for mixed neurotization techniques.

Neurotization Preferences in Smile Reanimation: A Discrete Choice Experiment

BACKGROUND

Common donor nerve options in smile reanimation include ipsilateral trigeminal motor or contralateral facial nerve branches. Neurotization preference may be influenced by multiple factors, whose relative importance remains poorly understood. In this article, decision-making in smile reanimation is assessed using a stated preference model.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews with facial palsy patients identified five relevant attributes for study: smile type ("smile when biting" versus "smile spontaneously" as proxies for trigeminal versus cross-facial neurotization), number of operations, success rates, complication rates, and side effects. Community volunteers (n = 250) completed a discrete-choice experiment relevant to free muscle transfer for smile reanimation. Preoperative and postoperative states were demonstrated through video vignettes, together with explanation of surgical risks, consequences, and benefits. Attribute importance was modeled using hierarchical Bayes estimation.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-one responses met quality controls. Attribute importance ranked as follows: chance of success, 37.3 percent; smile type, 21.4 percent; side effects, 13.9 percent; complication rates, 13.8; and number of operations, 13.6 percent. All attributes significantly correlated with decision making (p < 0.0001). An aggregate response model revealed most participants (67.6 percent; standard error, 3.0 percent) preferred smile reanimation by cross-facial (assuming a success rate of 80 percent) as opposed to ipsilateral trigeminal motor branch neurotization. When the success rate for cross-facial neurotization was reduced below 67 percent, trigeminal neurotization was preferred.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a higher risk of failure, most respondents preferred a cross-facial as opposed to trigeminal neurotization strategy for smile reanimation. These findings highlight the complexity of decision-making and need for individualized risk tolerance assessment in the field of facial reanimation.

Lessons from Gracilis Free Tissue Transfer for Facial Paralysis: Now versus 10 Years Ago

Outcomes following free gracilis muscle transfer have steadily improved during the past decade. Areas for continued improvement include re-creating natural smile vectors, improving midface symmetry, minimizing scarring, improving spontaneity, and increasing reliability using various neural sources. Outcome standardization, pooled data collection, and remote data acquisition methods will facilitate comparative effectiveness research and continued surgical advancements.

Dual Innervation of Free Functional Muscle Flaps in Facial Paralysis

Dual innervation in free muscle flap facial reanimation has been used to create a functional synergy between the powerful commissure excursion that can be achieved with the masseter nerve and the spontaneity that can be derived from a cross-face nerve graft. The gracilis has been the most frequently used muscle flap, and multiple combinations of neurorrhaphies have been described, including the masseter to the obturator (end-to-end) combined with a cross-face nerve graft to the obturator (end-to-side) and vice versa. Single and staged approaches have been reported. Minimally, dual innervation is as effective as using the motor nerve to masseter alone.

Long-term results of facial animation surgery in patients with Moebius syndrome

Gracilis neuromuscular transplant is considered the gold standard for facial animation in Moebius syndrome patients. However, long-term evaluation of the results has not been critically examined in the international literature. Thus, it remains unknown how the transplanted flap changes with facial growth, and whether contraction (smiling) is maintained. Pediatric patients with Moebius syndrome who underwent facial animation surgery with at least 5 years of follow-up were retrospectively examined. Photographs taken at the 1-year and most recent follow-up visits were analyzed and compared using Emotrics software. Analyses focused on the rest position, and on gentle and maximum smiles. Eighteen patients were enrolled. Seven patients had bilateral and 11 unilateral Moebius syndrome; therefore, 25 gracilis transplants were analyzed. The latest follow-ups ranged from 5 to 13.2 years (mean 7.6 years). The three principal facial expressions that were examined did not differ significantly between 1 year and a mean of 7.6 years after surgery, but tended to improve in most patients. Commissure excursion and smile angle for the maximum smile did improve significantly (p = 0.002 and 0.029, respectively). The series examined in this study supports the limited literature regarding the long-term stability of gracilis transplantation to animate the faces of Moebius syndrome children.

Advances in facial nerve management in the head and neck cancer patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize best practices in facial nerve management for patients with head and neck cancer. In addition, we provide a review of recent literature on novel innovations and techniques in facial reanimation surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although recommended when tumor ablation surgery requires facial nerve sacrifice, facial reanimation procedures are not always performed. Concurrent dynamic facial reanimation with masseteric nerve transfers and cable graft repair can preserve native facial muscle function. Static suspension can provide facial support and immediate resting symmetry for patients. Eyelid weight and eye care should not be delayed, particularly in patients with trigeminal sensory deficits. Choice of neural source to innervate a gracilis-free muscle transfer for smile reanimation remains controversial; however, new techniques, such as dual innervation and multivector muscle transfer, may improve aesthetic and functional outcomes.

SUMMARY

Management of the facial nerve in the setting of head and neck cancer presents unique challenges. When possible, simultaneous oncologic resection and facial reanimation is ideal given the open surgical field, newly dissected and electrically stimulatable facial nerve branches, as well as minimizing postoperative healing time to prevent postsurgical treatment delays. A coordinated approach to facial nerve management with a multidisciplinary surgical team may help provide optimal, comprehensive care.

Dermal Filler Treatment Improves Psychosocial Well-Being in Facial Paralysis Patients

Background: In the care of the facial paralysis (FP) patient, outcomes have historically focused on facial function rather than the psychosocial burden of the disease state. Yet, FP patients often describe the impact of their disease on domains of psychosocial health. These patient concerns have motivated clinicians to formally recognize and treat nonfunctional sequelae of the disease. Dermal filler therapy (DFT) is a minimally invasive reversible procedure that can be used to treat facial asymmetry and improve psychosocial well-being in FP patients. However, there are no data describing outcomes of DFT in FP-related facial asymmetry. Therefore, we sought to formally characterize FP patients' facial symmetry and psychosocial well-being before and after DFT. Methods: FP patients presenting for DFT at a tertiary academic medical center were prospectively interviewed. Patients completed the validated FACE-Q for Appearance-Related Psychosocial Distress instrument. Self-reported facial symmetry scores were recorded. Patients were evaluated before and 2 weeks after DFT. Statistical analysis was performed on R software using paired sample t-tests. Results: Twenty FP patients completed DFT treatment and two surveys. The cohort was predominantly female (n = 19, 95%) with an average age of 54 years. After a single treatment of DFT averaging 2.3 mL, patients had significant improvement in facial symmetry and psychosocial well-being. Patients felt particular improvement in self-confidence and emotional expression (p < 0.0001 for all stated comparisons). Conclusion: FP of varying etiologies is associated with significant functional, psychosocial, and quality-of-life impairments. This is the first prospective study to demonstrate statistically significant improvements in facial symmetry and psychosocial well-being after a single office-based treatment of dermal filler. In addition, our study's emphasis on psychosocial health instruments reflects an increased awareness of this important domain in the care of the FP patient.

Powering the Gracilis for Facial Reanimation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes Based on Donor Nerve

Importance

Free gracilis transfer for dynamic reanimation in chronic facial paralysis is the gold standard, but there remains a need to better understand outcomes with respect to the donor nerve.

Objective

To characterize outcomes in adults undergoing primary gracilis transfer for facial paralysis stratified by donor nerve used for neurotization.

Data Sources

Search strategies were used in Ovid MEDLINE (1946-2019), Embase (1947-2019), Scopus (1823-2019), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov (1997-2019).

Study Selection

Inclusion and exclusion criteria were designed to capture studies in adults with unilateral chronic facial paralysis undergoing single-paddle free gracilis transfer. All study types were included except case reports. Abstracts and full texts were reviewed in duplicate. Of 130 unique citations, 10 studies including 295 patients were included after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were analyzed between November 2018 and December 2019.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

PRISMA guidelines were followed. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess study quality, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess risk of bias. Independent extraction by 2 authors (P.M.V. and J.J.C.) was performed. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Owing to heterogeneity in reporting of facial reanimation outcomes, we first performed a systematic review, and then compiled available outcomes for meta-analysis. Outcomes studied for meta-analysis were oral commissure excursion and facial symmetry.

Results

Meta-analysis of masseteric nerve (MN) (n = 56) vs cross-facial nerve graft (CFNG) (n = 52) in 3 retrospective studies showed no statistical heterogeneity between these studies (I2 = 0%), and the standardized mean difference (SMD) was greater for MN (0.55; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.94). Meta-analysis of angles of symmetry in 2 retrospective studies comparing MN (n = 51) to CFNG (n = 47) both at rest (-0.22; 95% CI, -0.63 to 0.18) and with smiling (-0.14; 95% CI, -0.73 to 0.46) were better with MN, though the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions and Relevance

Owing to heterogeneity in reported outcomes from facial reanimation, we were unable to make definitive conclusions regarding the optimal donor nerve. Establishing a reporting standard at peer-reviewed journals to improve results reporting is one method to allow for improved collaboration in the future. Standardizing follow-up times, assessing spontaneity in an objective and reproducible fashion, and use of consistent outcome measures would allow for future meta-analyses and better understanding of options for facial reanimation.